Quotient of sum of exps

Percentage Accurate: 98.8% → 100.0%

Time: 4.8s

Alternatives: 8

Speedup: 2.9×

• could not determine a ground truth

  1. a = -2.00000000000000007e154
  2. b = -2.00000000000000007e154

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b) :precision binary64 (/ (exp a) (+ (exp a) (exp b))))

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	return exp(a) / (exp(a) + exp(b));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = exp(a) / (exp(a) + exp(b))
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b) {
	return Math.exp(a) / (Math.exp(a) + Math.exp(b));
}

Python

def code(a, b):
	return math.exp(a) / (math.exp(a) + math.exp(b))

Julia

function code(a, b)
	return Float64(exp(a) / Float64(exp(a) + exp(b)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, b)
	tmp = exp(a) / (exp(a) + exp(b));
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := N[(N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision] + N[Exp[b], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 98.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b) :precision binary64 (/ (exp a) (+ (exp a) (exp b))))

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	return exp(a) / (exp(a) + exp(b));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = exp(a) / (exp(a) + exp(b))
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b) {
	return Math.exp(a) / (Math.exp(a) + Math.exp(b));
}

Python

def code(a, b):
	return math.exp(a) / (math.exp(a) + math.exp(b))

Julia

function code(a, b)
	return Float64(exp(a) / Float64(exp(a) + exp(b)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, b)
	tmp = exp(a) / (exp(a) + exp(b));
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := N[(N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision] + N[Exp[b], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 2.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{1}{1 + e^{b - a}} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b) :precision binary64 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (- b a)))))

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	return 1.0 / (1.0 + exp((b - a)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = 1.0d0 / (1.0d0 + exp((b - a)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b) {
	return 1.0 / (1.0 + Math.exp((b - a)));
}

Python

def code(a, b):
	return 1.0 / (1.0 + math.exp((b - a)))

Julia

function code(a, b)
	return Float64(1.0 / Float64(1.0 + exp(Float64(b - a))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, b)
	tmp = 1.0 / (1.0 + exp((b - a)));
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := N[(1.0 / N[(1.0 + N[Exp[N[(b - a), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.0%

   \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-lft-identity 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1 \cdot e^{a}}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]

   2. associate-/l* 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{e^{a} + e^{b}}{e^{a}}}} \]

   3. remove-double-div 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\frac{e^{a} + e^{b}}{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{1}{e^{a}}}}}} \]

   4. exp-neg 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\frac{e^{a} + e^{b}}{\frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{-a}}}}} \]

   5. associate-/r/ 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\frac{e^{a} + e^{b}}{1} \cdot e^{-a}}} \]

   6. /-rgt-identity 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right)} \cdot e^{-a}} \]

   7. *-commutative 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{-a} \cdot \left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right)}} \]

   8. distribute-rgt-in 73.4%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{a} \cdot e^{-a} + e^{b} \cdot e^{-a}}} \]

   9. exp-neg 73.4%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{e^{a} \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{a}}} + e^{b} \cdot e^{-a}} \]

   10. rgt-mult-inverse 98.4%

       \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{1} + e^{b} \cdot e^{-a}} \]

   11. prod-exp 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \frac{1}{1 + \color{blue}{e^{b + \left(-a\right)}}} \]

   12. unsub-neg 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \frac{1}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{b - a}}} \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b - a}}} \]

4. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \frac{1}{1 + e^{b - a}} \]

Alternative 2: 54.7% accurate, 1.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{b} \leq 2 \cdot 10^{-11}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 + e^{b}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{b + 2}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= (exp b) 2e-11) (+ 1.0 (exp b)) (/ 1.0 (+ b 2.0))))

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (exp(b) <= 2e-11) {
		tmp = 1.0 + exp(b);
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 / (b + 2.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (exp(b) <= 2d-11) then
        tmp = 1.0d0 + exp(b)
    else
        tmp = 1.0d0 / (b + 2.0d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (Math.exp(b) <= 2e-11) {
		tmp = 1.0 + Math.exp(b);
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 / (b + 2.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if math.exp(b) <= 2e-11:
		tmp = 1.0 + math.exp(b)
	else:
		tmp = 1.0 / (b + 2.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (exp(b) <= 2e-11)
		tmp = Float64(1.0 + exp(b));
	else
		tmp = Float64(1.0 / Float64(b + 2.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (exp(b) <= 2e-11)
		tmp = 1.0 + exp(b);
	else
		tmp = 1.0 / (b + 2.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[N[Exp[b], $MachinePrecision], 2e-11], N[(1.0 + N[Exp[b], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(1.0 / N[(b + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (exp.f64 b) < 1.99999999999999988e-11

   1. Initial program 95.4%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-lft-identity 95.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1 \cdot e^{a}}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]

      2. associate-/l* 95.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{e^{a} + e^{b}}{e^{a}}}} \]

      3. remove-double-div 95.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\frac{e^{a} + e^{b}}{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{1}{e^{a}}}}}} \]

      4. exp-neg 95.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\frac{e^{a} + e^{b}}{\frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{-a}}}}} \]

      5. associate-/r/ 95.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\frac{e^{a} + e^{b}}{1} \cdot e^{-a}}} \]

      6. /-rgt-identity 95.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right)} \cdot e^{-a}} \]

      7. *-commutative 95.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{-a} \cdot \left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right)}} \]

      8. distribute-rgt-in 95.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{a} \cdot e^{-a} + e^{b} \cdot e^{-a}}} \]

      9. exp-neg 95.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{e^{a} \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{a}}} + e^{b} \cdot e^{-a}} \]

      10. rgt-mult-inverse 97.7%

          \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{1} + e^{b} \cdot e^{-a}} \]

      11. prod-exp 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \frac{1}{1 + \color{blue}{e^{b + \left(-a\right)}}} \]

      12. unsub-neg 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \frac{1}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{b - a}}} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b - a}}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-exp-log 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\log \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{b - a}}\right)}} \]

      2. log-rec 100.0%

         \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{-\log \left(1 + e^{b - a}\right)}} \]

      3. log1p-udef 100.0%

         \[\leadsto e^{-\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{b - a}\right)}} \]

   5. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{-\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{b - a}\right)}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto e^{-\color{blue}{\log \left(1 + e^{b}\right)}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. log1p-def 100.0%

         \[\leadsto e^{-\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{b}\right)}} \]

   8. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto e^{-\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{b}\right)}} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. add-sqr-sqrt 97.7%

         \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{\sqrt{-\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{b}\right)} \cdot \sqrt{-\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{b}\right)}}} \]

      2. sqrt-unprod 99.4%

         \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(-\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{b}\right)\right) \cdot \left(-\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{b}\right)\right)}}} \]

      3. sqr-neg 99.4%

         \[\leadsto e^{\sqrt{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{b}\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{b}\right)}}} \]

      4. sqrt-unprod 99.4%

         \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{\sqrt{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{b}\right)} \cdot \sqrt{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{b}\right)}}} \]

      5. add-sqr-sqrt 99.4%

         \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{b}\right)}} \]

      6. log1p-udef 99.4%

         \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{\log \left(1 + e^{b}\right)}} \]

      7. rem-exp-log 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 + e^{b}} \]

      8. +-commutative 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{b} + 1} \]

   10. Applied egg-rr 99.4%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{b} + 1} \]

   if 1.99999999999999988e-11 < (exp.f64 b)

   1. Initial program 98.6%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-lft-identity 98.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1 \cdot e^{a}}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]

      2. associate-/l* 98.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{e^{a} + e^{b}}{e^{a}}}} \]

      3. remove-double-div 98.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\frac{e^{a} + e^{b}}{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{1}{e^{a}}}}}} \]

      4. exp-neg 98.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\frac{e^{a} + e^{b}}{\frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{-a}}}}} \]

      5. associate-/r/ 98.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\frac{e^{a} + e^{b}}{1} \cdot e^{-a}}} \]

      6. /-rgt-identity 98.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right)} \cdot e^{-a}} \]

      7. *-commutative 98.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{-a} \cdot \left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right)}} \]

      8. distribute-rgt-in 68.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{a} \cdot e^{-a} + e^{b} \cdot e^{-a}}} \]

      9. exp-neg 68.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{e^{a} \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{a}}} + e^{b} \cdot e^{-a}} \]

      10. rgt-mult-inverse 98.6%

          \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{1} + e^{b} \cdot e^{-a}} \]

      11. prod-exp 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \frac{1}{1 + \color{blue}{e^{b + \left(-a\right)}}} \]

      12. unsub-neg 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \frac{1}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{b - a}}} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b - a}}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in a around 0 79.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in b around 0 47.4%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{2 + b}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 47.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{b + 2}} \]

   7. Simplified 47.4%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{b + 2}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 56.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;e^{b} \leq 2 \cdot 10^{-11}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 + e^{b}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{b + 2}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 97.9% accurate, 2.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -3.5 \cdot 10^{-12}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{1 + e^{-a}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= a -3.5e-12) (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (- a)))) (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp b)))))

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -3.5e-12) {
		tmp = 1.0 / (1.0 + exp(-a));
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 / (1.0 + exp(b));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (a <= (-3.5d-12)) then
        tmp = 1.0d0 / (1.0d0 + exp(-a))
    else
        tmp = 1.0d0 / (1.0d0 + exp(b))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -3.5e-12) {
		tmp = 1.0 / (1.0 + Math.exp(-a));
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 / (1.0 + Math.exp(b));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if a <= -3.5e-12:
		tmp = 1.0 / (1.0 + math.exp(-a))
	else:
		tmp = 1.0 / (1.0 + math.exp(b))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (a <= -3.5e-12)
		tmp = Float64(1.0 / Float64(1.0 + exp(Float64(-a))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(1.0 / Float64(1.0 + exp(b)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (a <= -3.5e-12)
		tmp = 1.0 / (1.0 + exp(-a));
	else
		tmp = 1.0 / (1.0 + exp(b));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[a, -3.5e-12], N[(1.0 / N[(1.0 + N[Exp[(-a)], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(1.0 / N[(1.0 + N[Exp[b], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if a < -3.5e-12

   1. Initial program 98.5%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-lft-identity 98.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1 \cdot e^{a}}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]

      2. associate-/l* 98.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{e^{a} + e^{b}}{e^{a}}}} \]

      3. remove-double-div 98.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\frac{e^{a} + e^{b}}{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{1}{e^{a}}}}}} \]

      4. exp-neg 98.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\frac{e^{a} + e^{b}}{\frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{-a}}}}} \]

      5. associate-/r/ 98.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\frac{e^{a} + e^{b}}{1} \cdot e^{-a}}} \]

      6. /-rgt-identity 98.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right)} \cdot e^{-a}} \]

      7. *-commutative 98.5%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{-a} \cdot \left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right)}} \]

      8. distribute-rgt-in 5.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{a} \cdot e^{-a} + e^{b} \cdot e^{-a}}} \]

      9. exp-neg 5.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{e^{a} \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{a}}} + e^{b} \cdot e^{-a}} \]

      10. rgt-mult-inverse 98.5%

          \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{1} + e^{b} \cdot e^{-a}} \]

      11. prod-exp 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \frac{1}{1 + \color{blue}{e^{b + \left(-a\right)}}} \]

      12. unsub-neg 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \frac{1}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{b - a}}} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b - a}}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in b around 0 98.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{-a}}} \]

   if -3.5e-12 < a

   1. Initial program 97.8%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-lft-identity 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1 \cdot e^{a}}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]

      2. associate-/l* 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{e^{a} + e^{b}}{e^{a}}}} \]

      3. remove-double-div 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\frac{e^{a} + e^{b}}{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{1}{e^{a}}}}}} \]

      4. exp-neg 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\frac{e^{a} + e^{b}}{\frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{-a}}}}} \]

      5. associate-/r/ 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\frac{e^{a} + e^{b}}{1} \cdot e^{-a}}} \]

      6. /-rgt-identity 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right)} \cdot e^{-a}} \]

      7. *-commutative 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{-a} \cdot \left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right)}} \]

      8. distribute-rgt-in 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{a} \cdot e^{-a} + e^{b} \cdot e^{-a}}} \]

      9. exp-neg 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{e^{a} \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{a}}} + e^{b} \cdot e^{-a}} \]

      10. rgt-mult-inverse 98.4%

          \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{1} + e^{b} \cdot e^{-a}} \]

      11. prod-exp 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \frac{1}{1 + \color{blue}{e^{b + \left(-a\right)}}} \]

      12. unsub-neg 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \frac{1}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{b - a}}} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b - a}}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in a around 0 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -3.5 \cdot 10^{-12}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{1 + e^{-a}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 98.3% accurate, 2.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -480:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{e^{a}}{a}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= a -480.0) (/ (exp a) a) (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp b)))))

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -480.0) {
		tmp = exp(a) / a;
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 / (1.0 + exp(b));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (a <= (-480.0d0)) then
        tmp = exp(a) / a
    else
        tmp = 1.0d0 / (1.0d0 + exp(b))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -480.0) {
		tmp = Math.exp(a) / a;
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 / (1.0 + Math.exp(b));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if a <= -480.0:
		tmp = math.exp(a) / a
	else:
		tmp = 1.0 / (1.0 + math.exp(b))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (a <= -480.0)
		tmp = Float64(exp(a) / a);
	else
		tmp = Float64(1.0 / Float64(1.0 + exp(b)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (a <= -480.0)
		tmp = exp(a) / a;
	else
		tmp = 1.0 / (1.0 + exp(b));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[a, -480.0], N[(N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision] / a), $MachinePrecision], N[(1.0 / N[(1.0 + N[Exp[b], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if a < -480

   1. Initial program 98.5%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in b around 0 98.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{e^{a}}{1 + e^{a}}} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0 97.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{2 + a}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{a + 2}} \]

   5. Simplified 97.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{a + 2}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around inf 97.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{e^{a}}{a}} \]

   if -480 < a

   1. Initial program 97.9%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-lft-identity 97.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1 \cdot e^{a}}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]

      2. associate-/l* 97.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{e^{a} + e^{b}}{e^{a}}}} \]

      3. remove-double-div 97.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\frac{e^{a} + e^{b}}{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{1}{e^{a}}}}}} \]

      4. exp-neg 97.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\frac{e^{a} + e^{b}}{\frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{-a}}}}} \]

      5. associate-/r/ 97.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\frac{e^{a} + e^{b}}{1} \cdot e^{-a}}} \]

      6. /-rgt-identity 97.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right)} \cdot e^{-a}} \]

      7. *-commutative 97.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{-a} \cdot \left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right)}} \]

      8. distribute-rgt-in 97.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{a} \cdot e^{-a} + e^{b} \cdot e^{-a}}} \]

      9. exp-neg 97.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{e^{a} \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{a}}} + e^{b} \cdot e^{-a}} \]

      10. rgt-mult-inverse 98.4%

          \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{1} + e^{b} \cdot e^{-a}} \]

      11. prod-exp 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \frac{1}{1 + \color{blue}{e^{b + \left(-a\right)}}} \]

      12. unsub-neg 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \frac{1}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{b - a}}} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b - a}}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in a around 0 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -480:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{e^{a}}{a}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 97.6% accurate, 2.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -3.5 \cdot 10^{-12}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{e^{a}}{a + 2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= a -3.5e-12) (/ (exp a) (+ a 2.0)) (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp b)))))

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -3.5e-12) {
		tmp = exp(a) / (a + 2.0);
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 / (1.0 + exp(b));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (a <= (-3.5d-12)) then
        tmp = exp(a) / (a + 2.0d0)
    else
        tmp = 1.0d0 / (1.0d0 + exp(b))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -3.5e-12) {
		tmp = Math.exp(a) / (a + 2.0);
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 / (1.0 + Math.exp(b));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if a <= -3.5e-12:
		tmp = math.exp(a) / (a + 2.0)
	else:
		tmp = 1.0 / (1.0 + math.exp(b))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (a <= -3.5e-12)
		tmp = Float64(exp(a) / Float64(a + 2.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(1.0 / Float64(1.0 + exp(b)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (a <= -3.5e-12)
		tmp = exp(a) / (a + 2.0);
	else
		tmp = 1.0 / (1.0 + exp(b));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[a, -3.5e-12], N[(N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision] / N[(a + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(1.0 / N[(1.0 + N[Exp[b], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if a < -3.5e-12

   1. Initial program 98.5%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in b around 0 98.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{e^{a}}{1 + e^{a}}} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0 94.3%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{2 + a}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 94.3%

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{a + 2}} \]

   5. Simplified 94.3%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{a + 2}} \]

   if -3.5e-12 < a

   1. Initial program 97.8%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-lft-identity 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1 \cdot e^{a}}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]

      2. associate-/l* 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{e^{a} + e^{b}}{e^{a}}}} \]

      3. remove-double-div 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\frac{e^{a} + e^{b}}{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{1}{e^{a}}}}}} \]

      4. exp-neg 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\frac{e^{a} + e^{b}}{\frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{-a}}}}} \]

      5. associate-/r/ 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\frac{e^{a} + e^{b}}{1} \cdot e^{-a}}} \]

      6. /-rgt-identity 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right)} \cdot e^{-a}} \]

      7. *-commutative 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{-a} \cdot \left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right)}} \]

      8. distribute-rgt-in 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{a} \cdot e^{-a} + e^{b} \cdot e^{-a}}} \]

      9. exp-neg 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{e^{a} \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{a}}} + e^{b} \cdot e^{-a}} \]

      10. rgt-mult-inverse 98.4%

          \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{1} + e^{b} \cdot e^{-a}} \]

      11. prod-exp 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \frac{1}{1 + \color{blue}{e^{b + \left(-a\right)}}} \]

      12. unsub-neg 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \frac{1}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{b - a}}} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b - a}}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in a around 0 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -3.5 \cdot 10^{-12}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{e^{a}}{a + 2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6: 65.5% accurate, 2.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -2.2:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{e^{a}}{a}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 + a \cdot 0.25\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= a -2.2) (/ (exp a) a) (+ 0.5 (* a 0.25))))

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -2.2) {
		tmp = exp(a) / a;
	} else {
		tmp = 0.5 + (a * 0.25);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (a <= (-2.2d0)) then
        tmp = exp(a) / a
    else
        tmp = 0.5d0 + (a * 0.25d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b) {
	double tmp;
	if (a <= -2.2) {
		tmp = Math.exp(a) / a;
	} else {
		tmp = 0.5 + (a * 0.25);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(a, b):
	tmp = 0
	if a <= -2.2:
		tmp = math.exp(a) / a
	else:
		tmp = 0.5 + (a * 0.25)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (a <= -2.2)
		tmp = Float64(exp(a) / a);
	else
		tmp = Float64(0.5 + Float64(a * 0.25));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (a <= -2.2)
		tmp = exp(a) / a;
	else
		tmp = 0.5 + (a * 0.25);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := If[LessEqual[a, -2.2], N[(N[Exp[a], $MachinePrecision] / a), $MachinePrecision], N[(0.5 + N[(a * 0.25), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if a < -2.2000000000000002

   1. Initial program 98.5%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in b around 0 98.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{e^{a}}{1 + e^{a}}} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in a around 0 94.2%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{2 + a}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 94.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{a + 2}} \]

   5. Simplified 94.2%

      \[\leadsto \frac{e^{a}}{\color{blue}{a + 2}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in a around inf 94.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{e^{a}}{a}} \]

   if -2.2000000000000002 < a

   1. Initial program 97.9%

      \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-lft-identity 97.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1 \cdot e^{a}}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]

      2. associate-/l* 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{e^{a} + e^{b}}{e^{a}}}} \]

      3. remove-double-div 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\frac{e^{a} + e^{b}}{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{1}{e^{a}}}}}} \]

      4. exp-neg 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\frac{e^{a} + e^{b}}{\frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{-a}}}}} \]

      5. associate-/r/ 97.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\frac{e^{a} + e^{b}}{1} \cdot e^{-a}}} \]

      6. /-rgt-identity 97.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right)} \cdot e^{-a}} \]

      7. *-commutative 97.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{-a} \cdot \left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right)}} \]

      8. distribute-rgt-in 97.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{a} \cdot e^{-a} + e^{b} \cdot e^{-a}}} \]

      9. exp-neg 97.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1}{e^{a} \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{a}}} + e^{b} \cdot e^{-a}} \]

      10. rgt-mult-inverse 98.4%

          \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{1} + e^{b} \cdot e^{-a}} \]

      11. prod-exp 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \frac{1}{1 + \color{blue}{e^{b + \left(-a\right)}}} \]

      12. unsub-neg 100.0%

          \[\leadsto \frac{1}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{b - a}}} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b - a}}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in b around 0 56.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{-a}}} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 55.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 + 0.25 \cdot a} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 55.4%

         \[\leadsto 0.5 + \color{blue}{a \cdot 0.25} \]

   7. Simplified 55.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 + a \cdot 0.25} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 65.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;a \leq -2.2:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{e^{a}}{a}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5 + a \cdot 0.25\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 7: 39.6% accurate, 61.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{1}{2 - a} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b) :precision binary64 (/ 1.0 (- 2.0 a)))

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	return 1.0 / (2.0 - a);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = 1.0d0 / (2.0d0 - a)
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b) {
	return 1.0 / (2.0 - a);
}

Python

def code(a, b):
	return 1.0 / (2.0 - a)

Julia

function code(a, b)
	return Float64(1.0 / Float64(2.0 - a))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, b)
	tmp = 1.0 / (2.0 - a);
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := N[(1.0 / N[(2.0 - a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.0%

   \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-lft-identity 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1 \cdot e^{a}}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]

   2. associate-/l* 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{e^{a} + e^{b}}{e^{a}}}} \]

   3. remove-double-div 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\frac{e^{a} + e^{b}}{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{1}{e^{a}}}}}} \]

   4. exp-neg 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\frac{e^{a} + e^{b}}{\frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{-a}}}}} \]

   5. associate-/r/ 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\frac{e^{a} + e^{b}}{1} \cdot e^{-a}}} \]

   6. /-rgt-identity 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right)} \cdot e^{-a}} \]

   7. *-commutative 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{-a} \cdot \left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right)}} \]

   8. distribute-rgt-in 73.4%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{a} \cdot e^{-a} + e^{b} \cdot e^{-a}}} \]

   9. exp-neg 73.4%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{e^{a} \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{a}}} + e^{b} \cdot e^{-a}} \]

   10. rgt-mult-inverse 98.4%

       \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{1} + e^{b} \cdot e^{-a}} \]

   11. prod-exp 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \frac{1}{1 + \color{blue}{e^{b + \left(-a\right)}}} \]

   12. unsub-neg 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \frac{1}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{b - a}}} \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b - a}}} \]

4. Taylor expanded in b around 0 67.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{-a}}} \]

5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 42.1%

   \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{2 + -1 \cdot a}} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. neg-mul-1 42.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2 + \color{blue}{\left(-a\right)}} \]

   2. unsub-neg 42.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{2 - a}} \]

7. Simplified 42.1%

   \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{2 - a}} \]

8. Final simplification 42.1%

   \[\leadsto \frac{1}{2 - a} \]

Alternative 8: 38.8% accurate, 305.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 0.5 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b) :precision binary64 0.5)

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	return 0.5;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = 0.5d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b) {
	return 0.5;
}

Python

def code(a, b):
	return 0.5

Julia

function code(a, b)
	return 0.5
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, b)
	tmp = 0.5;
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := 0.5

Derivation

1. Initial program 98.0%

   \[\frac{e^{a}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-lft-identity 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1 \cdot e^{a}}}{e^{a} + e^{b}} \]

   2. associate-/l* 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{e^{a} + e^{b}}{e^{a}}}} \]

   3. remove-double-div 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\frac{e^{a} + e^{b}}{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{1}{e^{a}}}}}} \]

   4. exp-neg 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\frac{e^{a} + e^{b}}{\frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{-a}}}}} \]

   5. associate-/r/ 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\frac{e^{a} + e^{b}}{1} \cdot e^{-a}}} \]

   6. /-rgt-identity 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right)} \cdot e^{-a}} \]

   7. *-commutative 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{-a} \cdot \left(e^{a} + e^{b}\right)}} \]

   8. distribute-rgt-in 73.4%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{e^{a} \cdot e^{-a} + e^{b} \cdot e^{-a}}} \]

   9. exp-neg 73.4%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{e^{a} \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{a}}} + e^{b} \cdot e^{-a}} \]

   10. rgt-mult-inverse 98.4%

       \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{1} + e^{b} \cdot e^{-a}} \]

   11. prod-exp 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \frac{1}{1 + \color{blue}{e^{b + \left(-a\right)}}} \]

   12. unsub-neg 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \frac{1}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{b - a}}} \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b - a}}} \]

4. Taylor expanded in a around 0 82.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{b}}} \]

5. Taylor expanded in b around 0 41.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5} \]

6. Final simplification 41.5%

   \[\leadsto 0.5 \]

Developer target: 100.0% accurate, 2.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{1}{1 + e^{b - a}} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (a b) :precision binary64 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (- b a)))))

C

double code(double a, double b) {
	return 1.0 / (1.0 + exp((b - a)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(a, b)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    code = 1.0d0 / (1.0d0 + exp((b - a)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double a, double b) {
	return 1.0 / (1.0 + Math.exp((b - a)));
}

Python

def code(a, b):
	return 1.0 / (1.0 + math.exp((b - a)))

Julia

function code(a, b)
	return Float64(1.0 / Float64(1.0 + exp(Float64(b - a))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(a, b)
	tmp = 1.0 / (1.0 + exp((b - a)));
end

Wolfram

code[a_, b_] := N[(1.0 / N[(1.0 + N[Exp[N[(b - a), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023320 
(FPCore (a b)
  :name "Quotient of sum of exps"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (- b a))))

  (/ (exp a) (+ (exp a) (exp b))))