a parameter of renormalized beta distribution

Percentage Accurate: 99.8% → 99.8%

Time: 4.9s

Alternatives: 8

Speedup: 1.0×

• 41.6% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

\[\left(0 < m \land 0 < v\right) \land v < 0.25\]

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (* (- (/ (* m (- 1.0 m)) v) 1.0) m))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * m;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = (((m * (1.0d0 - m)) / v) - 1.0d0) * m
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * m;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * m

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(m * Float64(1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * m)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * m;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(m * N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * m), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (* (- (/ (* m (- 1.0 m)) v) 1.0) m))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * m;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = (((m * (1.0d0 - m)) / v) - 1.0d0) * m
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * m;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * m

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(m * Float64(1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * m)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * m;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(m * N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * m), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ m \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + -1\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (* m (+ (/ (* m (- 1.0 m)) v) -1.0)))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return m * (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) + -1.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = m * (((m * (1.0d0 - m)) / v) + (-1.0d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return m * (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) + -1.0);
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return m * (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) + -1.0)

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(m * Float64(Float64(Float64(m * Float64(1.0 - m)) / v) + -1.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = m * (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) + -1.0);
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(m * N[(N[(N[(m * N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]

2. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + -1\right) \]

Alternative 2: 97.7% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \left(-1 + \frac{m}{\frac{-v}{m}}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 1.0) (* m (+ -1.0 (/ m v))) (* m (+ -1.0 (/ m (/ (- v) m))))))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.0) {
		tmp = m * (-1.0 + (m / v));
	} else {
		tmp = m * (-1.0 + (m / (-v / m)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 1.0d0) then
        tmp = m * ((-1.0d0) + (m / v))
    else
        tmp = m * ((-1.0d0) + (m / (-v / m)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.0) {
		tmp = m * (-1.0 + (m / v));
	} else {
		tmp = m * (-1.0 + (m / (-v / m)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 1.0:
		tmp = m * (-1.0 + (m / v))
	else:
		tmp = m * (-1.0 + (m / (-v / m)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 1.0)
		tmp = Float64(m * Float64(-1.0 + Float64(m / v)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(m * Float64(-1.0 + Float64(m / Float64(Float64(-v) / m))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 1.0)
		tmp = m * (-1.0 + (m / v));
	else
		tmp = m * (-1.0 + (m / (-v / m)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[m, 1.0], N[(m * N[(-1.0 + N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(m * N[(-1.0 + N[(m / N[((-v) / m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 1

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}} + -1\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in m around 0 79.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot m + \frac{{m}^{2}}{v}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 79.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-m\right)} + \frac{{m}^{2}}{v} \]

      2. +-commutative 79.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{m}^{2}}{v} + \left(-m\right)} \]

      3. unpow2 79.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{m \cdot m}}{v} + \left(-m\right) \]

      4. associate-*r/ 98.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{m}{v}} + \left(-m\right) \]

      5. neg-mul-1 98.5%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \frac{m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot m} \]

      6. *-commutative 98.5%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \frac{m}{v} + \color{blue}{m \cdot -1} \]

      7. distribute-lft-out 98.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 98.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right)} \]

   if 1 < m

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}} + -1\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in m around inf 97.5%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{v}{m}}} + -1\right) \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 97.5%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{\color{blue}{\frac{-1 \cdot v}{m}}} + -1\right) \]

      2. neg-mul-1 97.5%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{\frac{\color{blue}{-v}}{m}} + -1\right) \]

   6. Simplified 97.5%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{\color{blue}{\frac{-v}{m}}} + -1\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \left(-1 + \frac{m}{\frac{-v}{m}}\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 97.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \left(-1 - m \cdot \frac{m}{v}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 1.0) (* m (+ -1.0 (/ m v))) (* m (- -1.0 (* m (/ m v))))))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.0) {
		tmp = m * (-1.0 + (m / v));
	} else {
		tmp = m * (-1.0 - (m * (m / v)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 1.0d0) then
        tmp = m * ((-1.0d0) + (m / v))
    else
        tmp = m * ((-1.0d0) - (m * (m / v)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.0) {
		tmp = m * (-1.0 + (m / v));
	} else {
		tmp = m * (-1.0 - (m * (m / v)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 1.0:
		tmp = m * (-1.0 + (m / v))
	else:
		tmp = m * (-1.0 - (m * (m / v)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 1.0)
		tmp = Float64(m * Float64(-1.0 + Float64(m / v)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(m * Float64(-1.0 - Float64(m * Float64(m / v))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 1.0)
		tmp = m * (-1.0 + (m / v));
	else
		tmp = m * (-1.0 - (m * (m / v)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[m, 1.0], N[(m * N[(-1.0 + N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(m * N[(-1.0 - N[(m * N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 1

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}} + -1\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in m around 0 79.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot m + \frac{{m}^{2}}{v}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 79.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-m\right)} + \frac{{m}^{2}}{v} \]

      2. +-commutative 79.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{m}^{2}}{v} + \left(-m\right)} \]

      3. unpow2 79.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{m \cdot m}}{v} + \left(-m\right) \]

      4. associate-*r/ 98.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{m}{v}} + \left(-m\right) \]

      5. neg-mul-1 98.5%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \frac{m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot m} \]

      6. *-commutative 98.5%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \frac{m}{v} + \color{blue}{m \cdot -1} \]

      7. distribute-lft-out 98.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 98.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right)} \]

   if 1 < m

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}} + -1\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. clear-num 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{\frac{v}{1 - m}}{m}}} + -1\right) \]

      2. associate-/r/ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{v}{1 - m}} \cdot m} + -1\right) \]

      3. clear-num 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{1 - m}{v}} \cdot m + -1\right) \]

   5. Applied egg-rr 99.9%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{1 - m}{v} \cdot m} + -1\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in m around inf 97.5%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \frac{m}{v}\right)} \cdot m + -1\right) \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 97.5%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{-1 \cdot m}{v}} \cdot m + -1\right) \]

      2. mul-1-neg 97.5%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\frac{\color{blue}{-m}}{v} \cdot m + -1\right) \]

   8. Simplified 97.5%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{-m}{v}} \cdot m + -1\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \left(-1 - m \cdot \frac{m}{v}\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ m \cdot \left(-1 + m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (* m (+ -1.0 (* m (/ (- 1.0 m) v)))))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return m * (-1.0 + (m * ((1.0 - m) / v)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = m * ((-1.0d0) + (m * ((1.0d0 - m) / v)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return m * (-1.0 + (m * ((1.0 - m) / v)));
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return m * (-1.0 + (m * ((1.0 - m) / v)))

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(m * Float64(-1.0 + Float64(m * Float64(Float64(1.0 - m) / v))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = m * (-1.0 + (m * ((1.0 - m) / v)));
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(m * N[(-1.0 + N[(m * N[(N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

   2. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

   3. associate-/l* 99.9%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

   4. metadata-eval 99.9%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}} + -1\right)} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. clear-num 99.8%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{\frac{v}{1 - m}}{m}}} + -1\right) \]

   2. associate-/r/ 99.8%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{v}{1 - m}} \cdot m} + -1\right) \]

   3. clear-num 99.8%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{1 - m}{v}} \cdot m + -1\right) \]

5. Applied egg-rr 99.8%

   \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{1 - m}{v} \cdot m} + -1\right) \]

6. Final simplification 99.8%

   \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(-1 + m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}\right) \]

Alternative 5: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}} + -1\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (* m (+ (/ m (/ v (- 1.0 m))) -1.0)))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return m * ((m / (v / (1.0 - m))) + -1.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = m * ((m / (v / (1.0d0 - m))) + (-1.0d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return m * ((m / (v / (1.0 - m))) + -1.0);
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return m * ((m / (v / (1.0 - m))) + -1.0)

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(m * Float64(Float64(m / Float64(v / Float64(1.0 - m))) + -1.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = m * ((m / (v / (1.0 - m))) + -1.0);
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(m * N[(N[(m / N[(v / N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

   2. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

   3. associate-/l* 99.9%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

   4. metadata-eval 99.9%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}} + -1\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}} + -1\right) \]

Alternative 6: 51.4% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-m\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (if (<= m 1.0) (* m (+ -1.0 (/ m v))) (- m)))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.0) {
		tmp = m * (-1.0 + (m / v));
	} else {
		tmp = -m;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 1.0d0) then
        tmp = m * ((-1.0d0) + (m / v))
    else
        tmp = -m
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.0) {
		tmp = m * (-1.0 + (m / v));
	} else {
		tmp = -m;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 1.0:
		tmp = m * (-1.0 + (m / v))
	else:
		tmp = -m
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 1.0)
		tmp = Float64(m * Float64(-1.0 + Float64(m / v)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(-m);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 1.0)
		tmp = m * (-1.0 + (m / v));
	else
		tmp = -m;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[m, 1.0], N[(m * N[(-1.0 + N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], (-m)]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 1

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}} + -1\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in m around 0 79.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot m + \frac{{m}^{2}}{v}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 79.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-m\right)} + \frac{{m}^{2}}{v} \]

      2. +-commutative 79.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{m}^{2}}{v} + \left(-m\right)} \]

      3. unpow2 79.2%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{m \cdot m}}{v} + \left(-m\right) \]

      4. associate-*r/ 98.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{m}{v}} + \left(-m\right) \]

      5. neg-mul-1 98.5%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \frac{m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot m} \]

      6. *-commutative 98.5%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \frac{m}{v} + \color{blue}{m \cdot -1} \]

      7. distribute-lft-out 98.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 98.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right)} \]

   if 1 < m

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}} + -1\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in m around 0 5.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot m} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 5.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-m} \]

   6. Simplified 5.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-m} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 49.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-m\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 7: 37.1% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;v \leq 4.4 \cdot 10^{-198}:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \frac{m}{v}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-m\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (if (<= v 4.4e-198) (* m (/ m v)) (- m)))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (v <= 4.4e-198) {
		tmp = m * (m / v);
	} else {
		tmp = -m;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (v <= 4.4d-198) then
        tmp = m * (m / v)
    else
        tmp = -m
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (v <= 4.4e-198) {
		tmp = m * (m / v);
	} else {
		tmp = -m;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if v <= 4.4e-198:
		tmp = m * (m / v)
	else:
		tmp = -m
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (v <= 4.4e-198)
		tmp = Float64(m * Float64(m / v));
	else
		tmp = Float64(-m);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (v <= 4.4e-198)
		tmp = m * (m / v);
	else
		tmp = -m;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[v, 4.4e-198], N[(m * N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], (-m)]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if v < 4.4000000000000001e-198

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}} + -1\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in m around 0 25.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot m + \frac{{m}^{2}}{v}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 25.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-m\right)} + \frac{{m}^{2}}{v} \]

      2. +-commutative 25.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{m}^{2}}{v} + \left(-m\right)} \]

      3. unpow2 25.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{m \cdot m}}{v} + \left(-m\right) \]

      4. associate-*r/ 47.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{m}{v}} + \left(-m\right) \]

      5. neg-mul-1 47.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \frac{m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot m} \]

      6. *-commutative 47.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \frac{m}{v} + \color{blue}{m \cdot -1} \]

      7. distribute-lft-out 47.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 47.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in m around inf 18.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{m}^{2}}{v}} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. div-inv 18.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{m}^{2} \cdot \frac{1}{v}} \]

      2. unpow2 18.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(m \cdot m\right)} \cdot \frac{1}{v} \]

      3. associate-*r* 37.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1}{v}\right)} \]

      4. div-inv 37.3%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{m}{v}} \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 37.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{m}{v}} \]

   if 4.4000000000000001e-198 < v

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}} + -1\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in m around 0 37.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot m} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 37.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-m} \]

   6. Simplified 37.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-m} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 37.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;v \leq 4.4 \cdot 10^{-198}:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \frac{m}{v}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-m\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 8: 26.5% accurate, 5.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -m \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (- m))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return -m;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = -m
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return -m;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return -m

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(-m)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = -m;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := (-m)

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

   2. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

   3. associate-/l* 99.9%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

   4. metadata-eval 99.9%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}} + -1\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in m around 0 27.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot m} \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. neg-mul-1 27.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-m} \]

6. Simplified 27.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-m} \]

7. Final simplification 27.4%

   \[\leadsto -m \]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023319 
(FPCore (m v)
  :name "a parameter of renormalized beta distribution"
  :precision binary64
  :pre (and (and (< 0.0 m) (< 0.0 v)) (< v 0.25))
  (* (- (/ (* m (- 1.0 m)) v) 1.0) m))