Equirectangular approximation to distance on a great circle

Percentage Accurate: 59.4% → 99.9%

Time: 18.1s

Alternatives: 12

Speedup: 3.0×

• 30.6% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\\ R \cdot \sqrt{t_0 \cdot t_0 + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi1 phi2) 2.0)))))
   (* R (sqrt (+ (* t_0 t_0) (* (- phi1 phi2) (- phi1 phi2)))))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	return R * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: t_0
    t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0d0))
    code = r * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	return R * Math.sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))
	return R * math.sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))))

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(Float64(phi1 + phi2) / 2.0)))
	return Float64(R * sqrt(Float64(Float64(t_0 * t_0) + Float64(Float64(phi1 - phi2) * Float64(phi1 - phi2)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	tmp = R * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(N[(phi1 + phi2), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(t$95$0 * t$95$0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] * N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Initial Program: 59.4% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\\ R \cdot \sqrt{t_0 \cdot t_0 + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi1 phi2) 2.0)))))
   (* R (sqrt (+ (* t_0 t_0) (* (- phi1 phi2) (- phi1 phi2)))))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	return R * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: t_0
    t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0d0))
    code = r * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	return R * Math.sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))
	return R * math.sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))))

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(Float64(phi1 + phi2) / 2.0)))
	return Float64(R * sqrt(Float64(Float64(t_0 * t_0) + Float64(Float64(phi1 - phi2) * Float64(phi1 - phi2)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	tmp = R * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(N[(phi1 + phi2), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(t$95$0 * t$95$0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] * N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Alternative 1: 99.9% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right), \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \left(-\sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  R
  (hypot
   (*
    (- lambda1 lambda2)
    (fma
     (cos (* phi2 0.5))
     (cos (* 0.5 phi1))
     (* (sin (* phi2 0.5)) (- (sin (* 0.5 phi1))))))
   (- phi1 phi2))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * fma(cos((phi2 * 0.5)), cos((0.5 * phi1)), (sin((phi2 * 0.5)) * -sin((0.5 * phi1))))), (phi1 - phi2));
}

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(R * hypot(Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * fma(cos(Float64(phi2 * 0.5)), cos(Float64(0.5 * phi1)), Float64(sin(Float64(phi2 * 0.5)) * Float64(-sin(Float64(0.5 * phi1)))))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)))
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Cos[N[(phi2 * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi1), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[Sin[N[(phi2 * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * (-N[Sin[N[(0.5 * phi1), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision])), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 59.9%

   \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. hypot-def 96.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

3. Simplified 96.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. add-log-exp 96.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\log \left(e^{\cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)}\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   2. div-inv 96.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\cos \color{blue}{\left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot \frac{1}{2}\right)}}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   3. metadata-eval 96.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{0.5}\right)}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

5. Applied egg-rr 96.9%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\log \left(e^{\cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot 0.5\right)}\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 96.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\cos \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)}}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   2. +-commutative 96.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)}\right)}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   3. distribute-lft-in 96.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\cos \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2 + 0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   4. cos-sum 99.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   5. *-commutative 99.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\cos \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)} \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   6. *-commutative 99.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \color{blue}{\left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)} - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   7. *-commutative 99.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)} \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   8. *-commutative 99.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \color{blue}{\left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)}}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

7. Applied egg-rr 99.8%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\color{blue}{\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)}}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
8. Step-by-step derivation

   1. fma-neg 99.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \log \left(e^{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right), \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right), -\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)\right)}}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   2. add-log-exp 99.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right), \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right), -\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   3. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right), \cos \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}, -\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   4. distribute-rgt-neg-in 99.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right), \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), \color{blue}{\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \left(-\sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)\right)}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   5. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right), \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \left(-\sin \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

9. Applied egg-rr 99.9%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right), \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \left(-\sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

10. Final simplification 99.9%

    \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right), \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \left(-\sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

Alternative 2: 82.3% accurate, 1.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-38}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi2 5e-38)
   (* R (hypot phi1 (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (* 0.5 phi1)))))
   (* R (hypot (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (* phi2 0.5))) (- phi1 phi2)))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 5e-38) {
		tmp = R * hypot(phi1, ((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((0.5 * phi1))));
	} else {
		tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((phi2 * 0.5))), (phi1 - phi2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 5e-38) {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot(phi1, ((lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos((0.5 * phi1))));
	} else {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos((phi2 * 0.5))), (phi1 - phi2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi2 <= 5e-38:
		tmp = R * math.hypot(phi1, ((lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos((0.5 * phi1))))
	else:
		tmp = R * math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos((phi2 * 0.5))), (phi1 - phi2))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi2 <= 5e-38)
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(phi1, Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(0.5 * phi1)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(phi2 * 0.5))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi2 <= 5e-38)
		tmp = R * hypot(phi1, ((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((0.5 * phi1))));
	else
		tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((phi2 * 0.5))), (phi1 - phi2));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi2, 5e-38], N[(R * N[Sqrt[phi1 ^ 2 + N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi1), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(phi2 * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if phi2 < 5.00000000000000033e-38

   1. Initial program 58.3%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 97.0%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 49.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \sqrt{{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}^{2} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2} + {\phi_1}^{2}}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 49.2%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{{\phi_1}^{2} + {\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}^{2} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}}} \]

      2. unpow2 49.2%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1} + {\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}^{2} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}} \]

      3. unpow2 49.2%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1 + \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}} \]

      4. unpow2 49.2%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1 + \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right)}} \]

      5. unswap-sqr 49.2%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1 + \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right) \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right)}} \]

      6. hypot-def 77.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 77.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right)} \]

   if 5.00000000000000033e-38 < phi2

   1. Initial program 64.1%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 96.9%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 96.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 82.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-38}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 95.7% accurate, 1.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_2 + \phi_1}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  R
  (hypot (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi2 phi1) 2.0))) (- phi1 phi2))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi2 + phi1) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * Math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos(((phi2 + phi1) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	return R * math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos(((phi2 + phi1) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2))

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(R * hypot(Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(Float64(phi2 + phi1) / 2.0))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi2 + phi1) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(N[(phi2 + phi1), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 59.9%

   \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. hypot-def 96.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

3. Simplified 96.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 96.9%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_2 + \phi_1}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

Alternative 4: 79.5% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq 1.1 \cdot 10^{-38}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi2 1.1e-38)
   (* R (hypot phi1 (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (* 0.5 phi1)))))
   (* R (hypot (- lambda1 lambda2) (- phi1 phi2)))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 1.1e-38) {
		tmp = R * hypot(phi1, ((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((0.5 * phi1))));
	} else {
		tmp = R * hypot((lambda1 - lambda2), (phi1 - phi2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 1.1e-38) {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot(phi1, ((lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos((0.5 * phi1))));
	} else {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot((lambda1 - lambda2), (phi1 - phi2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi2 <= 1.1e-38:
		tmp = R * math.hypot(phi1, ((lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos((0.5 * phi1))))
	else:
		tmp = R * math.hypot((lambda1 - lambda2), (phi1 - phi2))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi2 <= 1.1e-38)
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(phi1, Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(0.5 * phi1)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2), Float64(phi1 - phi2)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi2 <= 1.1e-38)
		tmp = R * hypot(phi1, ((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((0.5 * phi1))));
	else
		tmp = R * hypot((lambda1 - lambda2), (phi1 - phi2));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi2, 1.1e-38], N[(R * N[Sqrt[phi1 ^ 2 + N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi1), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if phi2 < 1.10000000000000004e-38

   1. Initial program 58.3%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 97.0%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 49.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \sqrt{{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}^{2} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2} + {\phi_1}^{2}}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 49.2%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{{\phi_1}^{2} + {\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}^{2} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}}} \]

      2. unpow2 49.2%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1} + {\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}^{2} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}} \]

      3. unpow2 49.2%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1 + \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}} \]

      4. unpow2 49.2%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1 + \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right)}} \]

      5. unswap-sqr 49.2%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1 + \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right) \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right)}} \]

      6. hypot-def 77.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 77.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right)} \]

   if 1.10000000000000004e-38 < phi2

   1. Initial program 64.1%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 96.9%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 96.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 88.2%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\lambda_1 - \lambda_2}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 80.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq 1.1 \cdot 10^{-38}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 78.9% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq 5.6 \cdot 10^{-13}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi2 5.6e-13)
   (* R (hypot phi1 (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (* 0.5 phi1)))))
   (* R (hypot phi2 (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (* phi2 0.5)))))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 5.6e-13) {
		tmp = R * hypot(phi1, ((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((0.5 * phi1))));
	} else {
		tmp = R * hypot(phi2, ((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((phi2 * 0.5))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 5.6e-13) {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot(phi1, ((lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos((0.5 * phi1))));
	} else {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot(phi2, ((lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos((phi2 * 0.5))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi2 <= 5.6e-13:
		tmp = R * math.hypot(phi1, ((lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos((0.5 * phi1))))
	else:
		tmp = R * math.hypot(phi2, ((lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos((phi2 * 0.5))))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi2 <= 5.6e-13)
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(phi1, Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(0.5 * phi1)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(phi2, Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(phi2 * 0.5)))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi2 <= 5.6e-13)
		tmp = R * hypot(phi1, ((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((0.5 * phi1))));
	else
		tmp = R * hypot(phi2, ((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((phi2 * 0.5))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi2, 5.6e-13], N[(R * N[Sqrt[phi1 ^ 2 + N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi1), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * N[Sqrt[phi2 ^ 2 + N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(phi2 * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if phi2 < 5.6000000000000004e-13

   1. Initial program 58.7%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 97.0%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 49.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \sqrt{{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}^{2} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2} + {\phi_1}^{2}}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 49.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{{\phi_1}^{2} + {\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}^{2} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}}} \]

      2. unpow2 49.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1} + {\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}^{2} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}} \]

      3. unpow2 49.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1 + \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}} \]

      4. unpow2 49.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1 + \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right)}} \]

      5. unswap-sqr 49.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1 + \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right) \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right)}} \]

      6. hypot-def 77.9%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 77.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right)} \]

   if 5.6000000000000004e-13 < phi2

   1. Initial program 63.3%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 96.7%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 60.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \sqrt{{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}^{2} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2} + {\phi_2}^{2}}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 60.3%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{{\phi_2}^{2} + {\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}^{2} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}}} \]

      2. unpow2 60.3%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot \phi_2} + {\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}^{2} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}} \]

      3. unpow2 60.3%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_2 \cdot \phi_2 + {\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}^{2} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right)}} \]

      4. unpow2 60.3%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_2 \cdot \phi_2 + \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right)} \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right)} \]

      5. unswap-sqr 60.3%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_2 \cdot \phi_2 + \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right) \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right)}} \]

      6. hypot-def 86.6%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 86.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 80.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq 5.6 \cdot 10^{-13}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6: 70.3% accurate, 3.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq 2.55 \cdot 10^{+67}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \phi_2 - R \cdot \phi_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi2 2.55e+67)
   (* R (hypot phi1 (- lambda1 lambda2)))
   (- (* R phi2) (* R phi1))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 2.55e+67) {
		tmp = R * hypot(phi1, (lambda1 - lambda2));
	} else {
		tmp = (R * phi2) - (R * phi1);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 2.55e+67) {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot(phi1, (lambda1 - lambda2));
	} else {
		tmp = (R * phi2) - (R * phi1);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi2 <= 2.55e+67:
		tmp = R * math.hypot(phi1, (lambda1 - lambda2))
	else:
		tmp = (R * phi2) - (R * phi1)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi2 <= 2.55e+67)
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(phi1, Float64(lambda1 - lambda2)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(R * phi2) - Float64(R * phi1));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi2 <= 2.55e+67)
		tmp = R * hypot(phi1, (lambda1 - lambda2));
	else
		tmp = (R * phi2) - (R * phi1);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi2, 2.55e+67], N[(R * N[Sqrt[phi1 ^ 2 + N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(R * phi2), $MachinePrecision] - N[(R * phi1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if phi2 < 2.5500000000000001e67

   1. Initial program 59.6%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 96.6%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 49.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \sqrt{{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}^{2} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2} + {\phi_1}^{2}}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 49.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{{\phi_1}^{2} + {\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}^{2} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}}} \]

      2. unpow2 49.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1} + {\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}^{2} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}} \]

      3. unpow2 49.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1 + \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}} \]

      4. unpow2 49.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1 + \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right)}} \]

      5. unswap-sqr 49.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1 + \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right) \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right)}} \]

      6. hypot-def 75.9%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 75.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 67.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \color{blue}{\lambda_1 - \lambda_2}\right) \]

   if 2.5500000000000001e67 < phi2

   1. Initial program 61.0%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 98.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi1 around -inf 79.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \phi_1\right) + R \cdot \phi_2} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 79.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \phi_2 + -1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]

      2. mul-1-neg 79.3%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \phi_2 + \color{blue}{\left(-R \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]

      3. unsub-neg 79.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \phi_2 - R \cdot \phi_1} \]

      4. *-commutative 79.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R} - R \cdot \phi_1 \]

      5. *-commutative 79.3%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot R - \color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot R} \]

   6. Simplified 79.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R - \phi_1 \cdot R} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 70.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq 2.55 \cdot 10^{+67}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \phi_2 - R \cdot \phi_1\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 7: 85.0% accurate, 3.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (* R (hypot (- lambda1 lambda2) (- phi1 phi2))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * hypot((lambda1 - lambda2), (phi1 - phi2));
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * Math.hypot((lambda1 - lambda2), (phi1 - phi2));
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	return R * math.hypot((lambda1 - lambda2), (phi1 - phi2))

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(R * hypot(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2), Float64(phi1 - phi2)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = R * hypot((lambda1 - lambda2), (phi1 - phi2));
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 59.9%

   \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. hypot-def 96.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

3. Simplified 96.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 90.3%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

5. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 86.3%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\lambda_1 - \lambda_2}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

6. Final simplification 86.3%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

Alternative 8: 28.2% accurate, 29.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\lambda_1 \leq -9.2 \cdot 10^{+204}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(-\lambda_1\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\lambda_1 \leq 1.75 \cdot 10^{-130}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \phi_2 - R \cdot \phi_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \lambda_2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= lambda1 -9.2e+204)
   (* R (- lambda1))
   (if (<= lambda1 1.75e-130) (- (* R phi2) (* R phi1)) (* R lambda2))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (lambda1 <= -9.2e+204) {
		tmp = R * -lambda1;
	} else if (lambda1 <= 1.75e-130) {
		tmp = (R * phi2) - (R * phi1);
	} else {
		tmp = R * lambda2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (lambda1 <= (-9.2d+204)) then
        tmp = r * -lambda1
    else if (lambda1 <= 1.75d-130) then
        tmp = (r * phi2) - (r * phi1)
    else
        tmp = r * lambda2
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (lambda1 <= -9.2e+204) {
		tmp = R * -lambda1;
	} else if (lambda1 <= 1.75e-130) {
		tmp = (R * phi2) - (R * phi1);
	} else {
		tmp = R * lambda2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if lambda1 <= -9.2e+204:
		tmp = R * -lambda1
	elif lambda1 <= 1.75e-130:
		tmp = (R * phi2) - (R * phi1)
	else:
		tmp = R * lambda2
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (lambda1 <= -9.2e+204)
		tmp = Float64(R * Float64(-lambda1));
	elseif (lambda1 <= 1.75e-130)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(R * phi2) - Float64(R * phi1));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * lambda2);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (lambda1 <= -9.2e+204)
		tmp = R * -lambda1;
	elseif (lambda1 <= 1.75e-130)
		tmp = (R * phi2) - (R * phi1);
	else
		tmp = R * lambda2;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[lambda1, -9.2e+204], N[(R * (-lambda1)), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[lambda1, 1.75e-130], N[(N[(R * phi2), $MachinePrecision] - N[(R * phi1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * lambda2), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if lambda1 < -9.19999999999999962e204

   1. Initial program 52.2%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 92.9%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 92.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 52.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \sqrt{{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}^{2} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2} + {\phi_1}^{2}}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 52.2%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{{\phi_1}^{2} + {\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}^{2} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}}} \]

      2. unpow2 52.2%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1} + {\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}^{2} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}} \]

      3. unpow2 52.2%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1 + \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}} \]

      4. unpow2 52.2%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1 + \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right)}} \]

      5. unswap-sqr 52.2%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1 + \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right) \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right)}} \]

      6. hypot-def 82.9%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 82.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in lambda1 around -inf 51.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \left(\lambda_1 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)\right)} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 51.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-R \cdot \left(\lambda_1 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)} \]

      2. associate-*r* 51.5%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\left(R \cdot \lambda_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]

      3. distribute-lft-neg-in 51.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-R \cdot \lambda_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 51.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(-\color{blue}{\lambda_1 \cdot R}\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \]

   9. Simplified 51.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\lambda_1 \cdot R\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]

   10. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 71.0%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \lambda_1\right)} \]
   11. Step-by-step derivation

       1. mul-1-neg 71.0%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-R \cdot \lambda_1} \]

       2. *-commutative 71.0%

          \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\lambda_1 \cdot R} \]

       3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 71.0%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\lambda_1 \cdot \left(-R\right)} \]

   12. Simplified 71.0%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\lambda_1 \cdot \left(-R\right)} \]

   if -9.19999999999999962e204 < lambda1 < 1.75e-130

   1. Initial program 64.4%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 97.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi1 around -inf 35.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \phi_1\right) + R \cdot \phi_2} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 35.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \phi_2 + -1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]

      2. mul-1-neg 35.9%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \phi_2 + \color{blue}{\left(-R \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]

      3. unsub-neg 35.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \phi_2 - R \cdot \phi_1} \]

      4. *-commutative 35.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R} - R \cdot \phi_1 \]

      5. *-commutative 35.9%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot R - \color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot R} \]

   6. Simplified 35.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R - \phi_1 \cdot R} \]

   if 1.75e-130 < lambda1

   1. Initial program 54.6%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 97.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 44.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \sqrt{{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}^{2} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2} + {\phi_1}^{2}}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 44.7%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{{\phi_1}^{2} + {\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}^{2} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}}} \]

      2. unpow2 44.7%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1} + {\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}^{2} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}} \]

      3. unpow2 44.7%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1 + \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}} \]

      4. unpow2 44.7%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1 + \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right)}} \]

      5. unswap-sqr 44.7%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1 + \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right) \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right)}} \]

      6. hypot-def 74.7%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 74.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in lambda1 around 0 53.4%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(\lambda_2 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)}\right) \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 53.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \color{blue}{-\lambda_2 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 53.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, -\color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \lambda_2}\right) \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 53.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(-\lambda_2\right)}\right) \]

   9. Simplified 53.4%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(-\lambda_2\right)}\right) \]

   10. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 16.7%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \lambda_2} \]
   11. Step-by-step derivation

       1. *-commutative 16.7%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\lambda_2 \cdot R} \]

   12. Simplified 16.7%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\lambda_2 \cdot R} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 32.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\lambda_1 \leq -9.2 \cdot 10^{+204}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(-\lambda_1\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\lambda_1 \leq 1.75 \cdot 10^{-130}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \phi_2 - R \cdot \phi_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \lambda_2\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 9: 22.2% accurate, 46.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\lambda_1 \leq -1.6 \cdot 10^{+110}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(-\lambda_1\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\lambda_1 \leq -5.5 \cdot 10^{-298}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \phi_2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \lambda_2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= lambda1 -1.6e+110)
   (* R (- lambda1))
   (if (<= lambda1 -5.5e-298) (* R phi2) (* R lambda2))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (lambda1 <= -1.6e+110) {
		tmp = R * -lambda1;
	} else if (lambda1 <= -5.5e-298) {
		tmp = R * phi2;
	} else {
		tmp = R * lambda2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (lambda1 <= (-1.6d+110)) then
        tmp = r * -lambda1
    else if (lambda1 <= (-5.5d-298)) then
        tmp = r * phi2
    else
        tmp = r * lambda2
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (lambda1 <= -1.6e+110) {
		tmp = R * -lambda1;
	} else if (lambda1 <= -5.5e-298) {
		tmp = R * phi2;
	} else {
		tmp = R * lambda2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if lambda1 <= -1.6e+110:
		tmp = R * -lambda1
	elif lambda1 <= -5.5e-298:
		tmp = R * phi2
	else:
		tmp = R * lambda2
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (lambda1 <= -1.6e+110)
		tmp = Float64(R * Float64(-lambda1));
	elseif (lambda1 <= -5.5e-298)
		tmp = Float64(R * phi2);
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * lambda2);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (lambda1 <= -1.6e+110)
		tmp = R * -lambda1;
	elseif (lambda1 <= -5.5e-298)
		tmp = R * phi2;
	else
		tmp = R * lambda2;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[lambda1, -1.6e+110], N[(R * (-lambda1)), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[lambda1, -5.5e-298], N[(R * phi2), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * lambda2), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if lambda1 < -1.59999999999999997e110

   1. Initial program 50.9%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 92.9%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 92.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 46.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \sqrt{{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}^{2} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2} + {\phi_1}^{2}}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 46.9%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{{\phi_1}^{2} + {\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}^{2} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}}} \]

      2. unpow2 46.9%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1} + {\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}^{2} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}} \]

      3. unpow2 46.9%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1 + \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}} \]

      4. unpow2 46.9%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1 + \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right)}} \]

      5. unswap-sqr 46.9%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1 + \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right) \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right)}} \]

      6. hypot-def 67.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 67.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in lambda1 around -inf 42.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \left(\lambda_1 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)\right)} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 42.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-R \cdot \left(\lambda_1 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)} \]

      2. associate-*r* 42.2%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\left(R \cdot \lambda_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]

      3. distribute-lft-neg-in 42.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-R \cdot \lambda_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 42.2%

         \[\leadsto \left(-\color{blue}{\lambda_1 \cdot R}\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \]

   9. Simplified 42.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\lambda_1 \cdot R\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]

   10. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 55.8%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \lambda_1\right)} \]
   11. Step-by-step derivation

       1. mul-1-neg 55.8%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-R \cdot \lambda_1} \]

       2. *-commutative 55.8%

          \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\lambda_1 \cdot R} \]

       3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 55.8%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\lambda_1 \cdot \left(-R\right)} \]

   12. Simplified 55.8%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\lambda_1 \cdot \left(-R\right)} \]

   if -1.59999999999999997e110 < lambda1 < -5.4999999999999996e-298

   1. Initial program 62.2%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 97.6%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf 22.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \phi_2} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 22.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R} \]

   6. Simplified 22.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R} \]

   if -5.4999999999999996e-298 < lambda1

   1. Initial program 61.5%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 97.9%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 46.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \sqrt{{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}^{2} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2} + {\phi_1}^{2}}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 46.6%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{{\phi_1}^{2} + {\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}^{2} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}}} \]

      2. unpow2 46.6%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1} + {\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}^{2} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}} \]

      3. unpow2 46.6%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1 + \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}} \]

      4. unpow2 46.6%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1 + \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right)}} \]

      5. unswap-sqr 46.6%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1 + \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right) \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right)}} \]

      6. hypot-def 71.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 71.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in lambda1 around 0 56.6%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(\lambda_2 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)}\right) \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 56.6%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \color{blue}{-\lambda_2 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 56.6%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, -\color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \lambda_2}\right) \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 56.6%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(-\lambda_2\right)}\right) \]

   9. Simplified 56.6%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(-\lambda_2\right)}\right) \]

   10. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 19.3%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \lambda_2} \]
   11. Step-by-step derivation

       1. *-commutative 19.3%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\lambda_2 \cdot R} \]

   12. Simplified 19.3%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\lambda_2 \cdot R} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 26.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\lambda_1 \leq -1.6 \cdot 10^{+110}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(-\lambda_1\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\lambda_1 \leq -5.5 \cdot 10^{-298}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \phi_2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \lambda_2\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 10: 29.2% accurate, 54.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_1 \leq -6.3 \cdot 10^{-9}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(-\phi_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \phi_2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi1 -6.3e-9) (* R (- phi1)) (* R phi2)))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi1 <= -6.3e-9) {
		tmp = R * -phi1;
	} else {
		tmp = R * phi2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (phi1 <= (-6.3d-9)) then
        tmp = r * -phi1
    else
        tmp = r * phi2
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi1 <= -6.3e-9) {
		tmp = R * -phi1;
	} else {
		tmp = R * phi2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi1 <= -6.3e-9:
		tmp = R * -phi1
	else:
		tmp = R * phi2
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi1 <= -6.3e-9)
		tmp = Float64(R * Float64(-phi1));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * phi2);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi1 <= -6.3e-9)
		tmp = R * -phi1;
	else
		tmp = R * phi2;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi1, -6.3e-9], N[(R * (-phi1)), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * phi2), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if phi1 < -6.3000000000000002e-9

   1. Initial program 47.4%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 91.2%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 91.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi1 around -inf 61.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 61.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-R \cdot \phi_1} \]

      2. *-commutative 61.1%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot R} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 61.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot \left(-R\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 61.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot \left(-R\right)} \]

   if -6.3000000000000002e-9 < phi1

   1. Initial program 64.5%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 99.0%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf 23.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \phi_2} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 23.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R} \]

   6. Simplified 23.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 33.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_1 \leq -6.3 \cdot 10^{-9}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(-\phi_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \phi_2\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 11: 25.1% accurate, 65.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq 2.4 \cdot 10^{+66}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \lambda_2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \phi_2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi2 2.4e+66) (* R lambda2) (* R phi2)))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 2.4e+66) {
		tmp = R * lambda2;
	} else {
		tmp = R * phi2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (phi2 <= 2.4d+66) then
        tmp = r * lambda2
    else
        tmp = r * phi2
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 2.4e+66) {
		tmp = R * lambda2;
	} else {
		tmp = R * phi2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi2 <= 2.4e+66:
		tmp = R * lambda2
	else:
		tmp = R * phi2
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi2 <= 2.4e+66)
		tmp = Float64(R * lambda2);
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * phi2);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi2 <= 2.4e+66)
		tmp = R * lambda2;
	else
		tmp = R * phi2;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi2, 2.4e+66], N[(R * lambda2), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * phi2), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if phi2 < 2.4000000000000002e66

   1. Initial program 59.6%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 96.6%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 49.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \sqrt{{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}^{2} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2} + {\phi_1}^{2}}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 49.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{{\phi_1}^{2} + {\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}^{2} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}}} \]

      2. unpow2 49.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1} + {\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}^{2} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}} \]

      3. unpow2 49.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1 + \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}} \]

      4. unpow2 49.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1 + \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right)}} \]

      5. unswap-sqr 49.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1 + \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right) \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right)}} \]

      6. hypot-def 75.9%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 75.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in lambda1 around 0 57.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(\lambda_2 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)}\right) \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 57.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \color{blue}{-\lambda_2 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}\right) \]

      2. *-commutative 57.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, -\color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \lambda_2}\right) \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 57.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(-\lambda_2\right)}\right) \]

   9. Simplified 57.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(-\lambda_2\right)}\right) \]

   10. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 17.6%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \lambda_2} \]
   11. Step-by-step derivation

       1. *-commutative 17.6%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\lambda_2 \cdot R} \]

   12. Simplified 17.6%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\lambda_2 \cdot R} \]

   if 2.4000000000000002e66 < phi2

   1. Initial program 61.0%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 98.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 98.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf 78.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \phi_2} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 78.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R} \]

   6. Simplified 78.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 29.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq 2.4 \cdot 10^{+66}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \lambda_2\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \phi_2\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 12: 13.9% accurate, 109.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ R \cdot \lambda_2 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2) :precision binary64 (* R lambda2))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * lambda2;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    code = r * lambda2
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * lambda2;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	return R * lambda2

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(R * lambda2)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = R * lambda2;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(R * lambda2), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 59.9%

   \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. hypot-def 96.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

3. Simplified 96.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 46.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \sqrt{{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}^{2} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2} + {\phi_1}^{2}}} \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 46.6%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{{\phi_1}^{2} + {\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}^{2} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}}} \]

   2. unpow2 46.6%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1} + {\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}^{2} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}} \]

   3. unpow2 46.6%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1 + \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}} \]

   4. unpow2 46.6%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1 + \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right)}} \]

   5. unswap-sqr 46.6%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1 + \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right) \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right)}} \]

   6. hypot-def 68.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right)} \]

6. Simplified 68.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right)} \]

7. Taylor expanded in lambda1 around 0 52.7%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(\lambda_2 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)}\right) \]
8. Step-by-step derivation

   1. mul-1-neg 52.7%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \color{blue}{-\lambda_2 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}\right) \]

   2. *-commutative 52.7%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, -\color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \lambda_2}\right) \]

   3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 52.7%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(-\lambda_2\right)}\right) \]

9. Simplified 52.7%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(-\lambda_2\right)}\right) \]

10. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 15.4%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \lambda_2} \]
11. Step-by-step derivation

    1. *-commutative 15.4%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\lambda_2 \cdot R} \]

12. Simplified 15.4%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\lambda_2 \cdot R} \]

13. Final simplification 15.4%

    \[\leadsto R \cdot \lambda_2 \]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023318 
(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
  :name "Equirectangular approximation to distance on a great circle"
  :precision binary64
  (* R (sqrt (+ (* (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi1 phi2) 2.0))) (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi1 phi2) 2.0)))) (* (- phi1 phi2) (- phi1 phi2))))))