Numeric.SpecFunctions:incompleteGamma from math-functions-0.1.5.2, A

Percentage Accurate: 99.9% → 99.9%

Time: 7.9s

Alternatives: 8

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - z\right) + \log t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ (- (- (* x (log y)) y) z) (log t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x * log(y)) - y) - z) + log(t);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (((x * log(y)) - y) - z) + log(t)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x * Math.log(y)) - y) - z) + Math.log(t);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((x * math.log(y)) - y) - z) + math.log(t)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * log(y)) - y) - z) + log(t))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((x * log(y)) - y) - z) + log(t);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - y), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision] + N[Log[t], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - z\right) + \log t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ (- (- (* x (log y)) y) z) (log t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x * log(y)) - y) - z) + log(t);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (((x * log(y)) - y) - z) + log(t)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((x * Math.log(y)) - y) - z) + Math.log(t);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((x * math.log(y)) - y) - z) + math.log(t)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * log(y)) - y) - z) + log(t))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((x * log(y)) - y) - z) + log(t);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - y), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision] + N[Log[t], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.9% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, \left(-y\right) - z\right) + \log t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ (fma x (log y) (- (- y) z)) (log t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return fma(x, log(y), (-y - z)) + log(t);
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(fma(x, log(y), Float64(Float64(-y) - z)) + log(t))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision] + N[((-y) - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[Log[t], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - z\right) + \log t \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + \left(-y\right)\right)} - z\right) + \log t \]

   2. associate--l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + \left(\left(-y\right) - z\right)\right)} + \log t \]

   3. fma-def 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, \left(-y\right) - z\right)} + \log t \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, \left(-y\right) - z\right) + \log t} \]

4. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, \left(-y\right) - z\right) + \log t \]

Alternative 2: 98.3% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - z\\ \mathbf{if}\;t_1 \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+31} \lor \neg \left(t_1 \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-11}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;t_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log t - \left(y + z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (- (- (* x (log y)) y) z)))
   (if (or (<= t_1 -1e+31) (not (<= t_1 5e-11))) t_1 (- (log t) (+ y z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = ((x * log(y)) - y) - z;
	double tmp;
	if ((t_1 <= -1e+31) || !(t_1 <= 5e-11)) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = log(t) - (y + z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = ((x * log(y)) - y) - z
    if ((t_1 <= (-1d+31)) .or. (.not. (t_1 <= 5d-11))) then
        tmp = t_1
    else
        tmp = log(t) - (y + z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = ((x * Math.log(y)) - y) - z;
	double tmp;
	if ((t_1 <= -1e+31) || !(t_1 <= 5e-11)) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = Math.log(t) - (y + z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	t_1 = ((x * math.log(y)) - y) - z
	tmp = 0
	if (t_1 <= -1e+31) or not (t_1 <= 5e-11):
		tmp = t_1
	else:
		tmp = math.log(t) - (y + z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(Float64(x * log(y)) - y) - z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((t_1 <= -1e+31) || !(t_1 <= 5e-11))
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = Float64(log(t) - Float64(y + z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = ((x * log(y)) - y) - z;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t_1 <= -1e+31) || ~((t_1 <= 5e-11)))
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = log(t) - (y + z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - y), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Or[LessEqual[t$95$1, -1e+31], N[Not[LessEqual[t$95$1, 5e-11]], $MachinePrecision]], t$95$1, N[(N[Log[t], $MachinePrecision] - N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (-.f64 (-.f64 (*.f64 x (log.f64 y)) y) z) < -9.9999999999999996e30 or 5.00000000000000018e-11 < (-.f64 (-.f64 (*.f64 x (log.f64 y)) y) z)

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - z\right) + \log t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - \left(z - \log t\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - \left(z - \log t\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - \color{blue}{z} \]

   if -9.9999999999999996e30 < (-.f64 (-.f64 (*.f64 x (log.f64 y)) y) z) < 5.00000000000000018e-11

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - z\right) + \log t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + \left(-y\right)\right)} - z\right) + \log t \]

      2. associate--l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + \left(\left(-y\right) - z\right)\right)} + \log t \]

      3. fma-def 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, \left(-y\right) - z\right)} + \log t \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, \left(-y\right) - z\right) + \log t} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log t - \left(y + z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - z \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+31} \lor \neg \left(\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - z \leq 5 \cdot 10^{-11}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log t - \left(y + z\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 99.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := x \cdot \log y\\ \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 0.096:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(\log t + t_1\right) - z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(t_1 - y\right) - z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* x (log y))))
   (if (<= y 0.096) (- (+ (log t) t_1) z) (- (- t_1 y) z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = x * log(y);
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 0.096) {
		tmp = (log(t) + t_1) - z;
	} else {
		tmp = (t_1 - y) - z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = x * log(y)
    if (y <= 0.096d0) then
        tmp = (log(t) + t_1) - z
    else
        tmp = (t_1 - y) - z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = x * Math.log(y);
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 0.096) {
		tmp = (Math.log(t) + t_1) - z;
	} else {
		tmp = (t_1 - y) - z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	t_1 = x * math.log(y)
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 0.096:
		tmp = (math.log(t) + t_1) - z
	else:
		tmp = (t_1 - y) - z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(x * log(y))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 0.096)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(log(t) + t_1) - z);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(t_1 - y) - z);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = x * log(y);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 0.096)
		tmp = (log(t) + t_1) - z;
	else
		tmp = (t_1 - y) - z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[y, 0.096], N[(N[(N[Log[t], $MachinePrecision] + t$95$1), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(t$95$1 - y), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 0.096000000000000002

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - z\right) + \log t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + \left(-y\right)\right)} - z\right) + \log t \]

      2. associate--l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + \left(\left(-y\right) - z\right)\right)} + \log t \]

      3. fma-def 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, \left(-y\right) - z\right)} + \log t \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, \left(-y\right) - z\right) + \log t} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\log t + x \cdot \log y\right) - z} \]

   if 0.096000000000000002 < y

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - z\right) + \log t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - \left(z - \log t\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - \left(z - \log t\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 98.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - \color{blue}{z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 0.096:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(\log t + x \cdot \log y\right) - z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - z\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \log t + \left(\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ (log t) (- (- (* x (log y)) y) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return log(t) + (((x * log(y)) - y) - z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = log(t) + (((x * log(y)) - y) - z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return Math.log(t) + (((x * Math.log(y)) - y) - z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return math.log(t) + (((x * math.log(y)) - y) - z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(log(t) + Float64(Float64(Float64(x * log(y)) - y) - z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = log(t) + (((x * log(y)) - y) - z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[Log[t], $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(N[(x * N[Log[y], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - y), $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - z\right) + \log t \]

2. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \log t + \left(\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - z\right) \]

Alternative 5: 60.5% accurate, 2.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.7 \cdot 10^{+50} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 6.8 \cdot 10^{+55}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log t - y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -1.7e+50) (not (<= z 6.8e+55))) (- z) (- (log t) y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.7e+50) || !(z <= 6.8e+55)) {
		tmp = -z;
	} else {
		tmp = log(t) - y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-1.7d+50)) .or. (.not. (z <= 6.8d+55))) then
        tmp = -z
    else
        tmp = log(t) - y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.7e+50) || !(z <= 6.8e+55)) {
		tmp = -z;
	} else {
		tmp = Math.log(t) - y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -1.7e+50) or not (z <= 6.8e+55):
		tmp = -z
	else:
		tmp = math.log(t) - y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -1.7e+50) || !(z <= 6.8e+55))
		tmp = Float64(-z);
	else
		tmp = Float64(log(t) - y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -1.7e+50) || ~((z <= 6.8e+55)))
		tmp = -z;
	else
		tmp = log(t) - y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -1.7e+50], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 6.8e+55]], $MachinePrecision]], (-z), N[(N[Log[t], $MachinePrecision] - y), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.6999999999999999e50 or 6.7999999999999996e55 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - z\right) + \log t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + \left(-y\right)\right)} - z\right) + \log t \]

      2. associate--l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + \left(\left(-y\right) - z\right)\right)} + \log t \]

      3. fma-def 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, \left(-y\right) - z\right)} + \log t \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, \left(-y\right) - z\right) + \log t} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 82.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log t - \left(y + z\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 64.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 64.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]

   7. Simplified 64.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]

   if -1.6999999999999999e50 < z < 6.7999999999999996e55

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - z\right) + \log t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + \left(-y\right)\right)} - z\right) + \log t \]

      2. associate--l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + \left(\left(-y\right) - z\right)\right)} + \log t \]

      3. fma-def 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, \left(-y\right) - z\right)} + \log t \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, \left(-y\right) - z\right) + \log t} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 67.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot y} + \log t \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 67.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + \log t \]

   6. Simplified 67.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + \log t \]

   7. Taylor expanded in y around 0 67.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log t + -1 \cdot y} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 67.8%

         \[\leadsto \log t + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 67.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log t - y} \]

   9. Simplified 67.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log t - y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 66.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.7 \cdot 10^{+50} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 6.8 \cdot 10^{+55}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log t - y\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6: 41.4% accurate, 2.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -200 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.04 \cdot 10^{-16}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -200.0) (not (<= z 1.04e-16))) (- z) (log t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -200.0) || !(z <= 1.04e-16)) {
		tmp = -z;
	} else {
		tmp = log(t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-200.0d0)) .or. (.not. (z <= 1.04d-16))) then
        tmp = -z
    else
        tmp = log(t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -200.0) || !(z <= 1.04e-16)) {
		tmp = -z;
	} else {
		tmp = Math.log(t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -200.0) or not (z <= 1.04e-16):
		tmp = -z
	else:
		tmp = math.log(t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -200.0) || !(z <= 1.04e-16))
		tmp = Float64(-z);
	else
		tmp = log(t);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -200.0) || ~((z <= 1.04e-16)))
		tmp = -z;
	else
		tmp = log(t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -200.0], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 1.04e-16]], $MachinePrecision]], (-z), N[Log[t], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -200 or 1.04000000000000001e-16 < z

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - z\right) + \log t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + \left(-y\right)\right)} - z\right) + \log t \]

      2. associate--l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + \left(\left(-y\right) - z\right)\right)} + \log t \]

      3. fma-def 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, \left(-y\right) - z\right)} + \log t \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, \left(-y\right) - z\right) + \log t} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 80.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log t - \left(y + z\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 51.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 51.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]

   7. Simplified 51.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]

   if -200 < z < 1.04000000000000001e-16

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - z\right) + \log t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + \left(-y\right)\right)} - z\right) + \log t \]

      2. associate--l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + \left(\left(-y\right) - z\right)\right)} + \log t \]

      3. fma-def 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, \left(-y\right) - z\right)} + \log t \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, \left(-y\right) - z\right) + \log t} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 67.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot y} + \log t \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 67.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + \log t \]

   6. Simplified 67.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} + \log t \]

   7. Taylor expanded in y around 0 31.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log t} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 40.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -200 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.04 \cdot 10^{-16}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log t\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 7: 70.8% accurate, 2.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \log t - \left(y + z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- (log t) (+ y z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return log(t) - (y + z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = log(t) - (y + z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return Math.log(t) - (y + z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return math.log(t) - (y + z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(log(t) - Float64(y + z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = log(t) - (y + z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[Log[t], $MachinePrecision] - N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - z\right) + \log t \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + \left(-y\right)\right)} - z\right) + \log t \]

   2. associate--l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + \left(\left(-y\right) - z\right)\right)} + \log t \]

   3. fma-def 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, \left(-y\right) - z\right)} + \log t \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, \left(-y\right) - z\right) + \log t} \]

4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 73.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log t - \left(y + z\right)} \]

5. Final simplification 73.6%

   \[\leadsto \log t - \left(y + z\right) \]

Alternative 8: 29.9% accurate, 104.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return -z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = -z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return -z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return -z

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(-z)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = -z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := (-z)

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot \log y - y\right) - z\right) + \log t \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + \left(-y\right)\right)} - z\right) + \log t \]

   2. associate--l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \log y + \left(\left(-y\right) - z\right)\right)} + \log t \]

   3. fma-def 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, \left(-y\right) - z\right)} + \log t \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \log y, \left(-y\right) - z\right) + \log t} \]

4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 73.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log t - \left(y + z\right)} \]

5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 25.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. neg-mul-1 25.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]

7. Simplified 25.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-z} \]

8. Final simplification 25.5%

   \[\leadsto -z \]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023315 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "Numeric.SpecFunctions:incompleteGamma from math-functions-0.1.5.2, A"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (- (- (* x (log y)) y) z) (log t)))