Sample trimmed logistic on [-pi, pi]

Percentage Accurate: 98.9% → 99.0%
Time: 14.4s
Alternatives: 9
Speedup: 1.4×

Specification

?
\[\left(2.328306437 \cdot 10^{-10} \leq u \land u \leq 1\right) \land \left(0 \leq s \land s \leq 1.0651631\right)\]
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t_0\right) + t_0} - 1\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))
   (*
    (- s)
    (log
     (-
      (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) t_0)) t_0))
      1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float t_0 = 1.0f / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)));
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / ((u * ((1.0f / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - 1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	t_0 = Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - Float32(1.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	t_0 = single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)));
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / ((u * ((single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - single(1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t_0\right) + t_0} - 1\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary32 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 9 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 98.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t_0\right) + t_0} - 1\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))
   (*
    (- s)
    (log
     (-
      (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) t_0)) t_0))
      1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float t_0 = 1.0f / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)));
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / ((u * ((1.0f / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - 1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	t_0 = Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - Float32(1.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	t_0 = single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)));
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / ((u * ((single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - single(1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t_0\right) + t_0} - 1\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 99.0% accurate, 1.2× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + {e}^{\left(\pi \cdot \frac{1}{s}\right)}}} + -1\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  (- s)
  (log
   (+
    (/
     1.0
     (+
      (/ u (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI (- s)))))
      (/ (- 1.0 u) (+ 1.0 (pow E (* PI (/ 1.0 s)))))))
    -1.0))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / ((u / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / -s)))) + ((1.0f - u) / (1.0f + powf(((float) M_E), (((float) M_PI) * (1.0f / s))))))) + -1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / Float32(-s))))) + Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + (Float32(exp(1)) ^ Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(Float32(1.0) / s))))))) + Float32(-1.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / ((u / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / -s)))) + ((single(1.0) - u) / (single(1.0) + (single(2.71828182845904523536) ^ (single(pi) * (single(1.0) / s))))))) + single(-1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + {e}^{\left(\pi \cdot \frac{1}{s}\right)}}} + -1\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-un-lft-identity98.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
    2. exp-prod99.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{{\left(e^{1}\right)}^{\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  4. Applied egg-rr99.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{{\left(e^{1}\right)}^{\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. div-inv99.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + {\left(e^{1}\right)}^{\color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot \frac{1}{s}\right)}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  6. Applied egg-rr99.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + {\left(e^{1}\right)}^{\color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot \frac{1}{s}\right)}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  7. Final simplification99.0%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + {e}^{\left(\pi \cdot \frac{1}{s}\right)}}} + -1\right) \]

Alternative 2: 99.0% accurate, 1.2× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + {e}^{\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}}\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  (- s)
  (log
   (+
    -1.0
    (/
     1.0
     (+
      (/ u (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI (- s)))))
      (/ (- 1.0 u) (+ 1.0 (pow E (/ PI s))))))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -s * logf((-1.0f + (1.0f / ((u / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / -s)))) + ((1.0f - u) / (1.0f + powf(((float) M_E), (((float) M_PI) / s))))))));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(-1.0) + Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / Float32(-s))))) + Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + (Float32(exp(1)) ^ Float32(Float32(pi) / s)))))))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = -s * log((single(-1.0) + (single(1.0) / ((u / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / -s)))) + ((single(1.0) - u) / (single(1.0) + (single(2.71828182845904523536) ^ (single(pi) / s))))))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + {e}^{\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}}\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-un-lft-identity98.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
    2. exp-prod99.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{{\left(e^{1}\right)}^{\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  4. Applied egg-rr99.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{{\left(e^{1}\right)}^{\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  5. Final simplification99.0%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + {e}^{\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}}\right) \]

Alternative 3: 98.9% accurate, 1.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{1}{s \cdot \frac{1}{\pi}}}}}\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  (- s)
  (log
   (+
    -1.0
    (/
     1.0
     (+
      (/ u (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI (- s)))))
      (/ (- 1.0 u) (+ 1.0 (exp (/ 1.0 (* s (/ 1.0 PI))))))))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -s * logf((-1.0f + (1.0f / ((u / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / -s)))) + ((1.0f - u) / (1.0f + expf((1.0f / (s * (1.0f / ((float) M_PI)))))))))));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(-1.0) + Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / Float32(-s))))) + Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(s * Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(pi))))))))))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = -s * log((single(-1.0) + (single(1.0) / ((u / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / -s)))) + ((single(1.0) - u) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(1.0) / (s * (single(1.0) / single(pi)))))))))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{1}{s \cdot \frac{1}{\pi}}}}}\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Step-by-step derivation
    1. div-inv98.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{\pi \cdot \frac{1}{s}}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
    2. add-cube-cbrt99.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{\left(\left(\sqrt[3]{\pi} \cdot \sqrt[3]{\pi}\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{\pi}\right)} \cdot \frac{1}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
    3. associate-*l*99.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{\left(\sqrt[3]{\pi} \cdot \sqrt[3]{\pi}\right) \cdot \left(\sqrt[3]{\pi} \cdot \frac{1}{s}\right)}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
    4. pow299.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{\pi}\right)}^{2}} \cdot \left(\sqrt[3]{\pi} \cdot \frac{1}{s}\right)}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  4. Applied egg-rr99.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{\pi}\right)}^{2} \cdot \left(\sqrt[3]{\pi} \cdot \frac{1}{s}\right)}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate-*r*99.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{\left({\left(\sqrt[3]{\pi}\right)}^{2} \cdot \sqrt[3]{\pi}\right) \cdot \frac{1}{s}}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
    2. unpow299.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\left(\color{blue}{\left(\sqrt[3]{\pi} \cdot \sqrt[3]{\pi}\right)} \cdot \sqrt[3]{\pi}\right) \cdot \frac{1}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
    3. add-cube-cbrt98.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{\pi} \cdot \frac{1}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
    4. div-inv98.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
    5. clear-num98.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{s}{\pi}}}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  6. Applied egg-rr98.9%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{s}{\pi}}}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  7. Step-by-step derivation
    1. div-inv99.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{1}{\color{blue}{s \cdot \frac{1}{\pi}}}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  8. Applied egg-rr99.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{1}{\color{blue}{s \cdot \frac{1}{\pi}}}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  9. Final simplification99.0%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{1}{s \cdot \frac{1}{\pi}}}}}\right) \]

Alternative 4: 98.9% accurate, 1.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{1}{\frac{s}{\pi}}}}}\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  (- s)
  (log
   (+
    -1.0
    (/
     1.0
     (+
      (/ u (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI (- s)))))
      (/ (- 1.0 u) (+ 1.0 (exp (/ 1.0 (/ s PI)))))))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -s * logf((-1.0f + (1.0f / ((u / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / -s)))) + ((1.0f - u) / (1.0f + expf((1.0f / (s / ((float) M_PI))))))))));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(-1.0) + Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / Float32(-s))))) + Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(s / Float32(pi)))))))))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = -s * log((single(-1.0) + (single(1.0) / ((u / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / -s)))) + ((single(1.0) - u) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(1.0) / (s / single(pi))))))))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{1}{\frac{s}{\pi}}}}}\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Step-by-step derivation
    1. div-inv98.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{\pi \cdot \frac{1}{s}}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
    2. add-cube-cbrt99.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{\left(\left(\sqrt[3]{\pi} \cdot \sqrt[3]{\pi}\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{\pi}\right)} \cdot \frac{1}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
    3. associate-*l*99.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{\left(\sqrt[3]{\pi} \cdot \sqrt[3]{\pi}\right) \cdot \left(\sqrt[3]{\pi} \cdot \frac{1}{s}\right)}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
    4. pow299.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{\pi}\right)}^{2}} \cdot \left(\sqrt[3]{\pi} \cdot \frac{1}{s}\right)}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  4. Applied egg-rr99.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{\pi}\right)}^{2} \cdot \left(\sqrt[3]{\pi} \cdot \frac{1}{s}\right)}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate-*r*99.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{\left({\left(\sqrt[3]{\pi}\right)}^{2} \cdot \sqrt[3]{\pi}\right) \cdot \frac{1}{s}}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
    2. unpow299.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\left(\color{blue}{\left(\sqrt[3]{\pi} \cdot \sqrt[3]{\pi}\right)} \cdot \sqrt[3]{\pi}\right) \cdot \frac{1}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
    3. add-cube-cbrt98.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{\pi} \cdot \frac{1}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
    4. div-inv98.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
    5. clear-num98.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{s}{\pi}}}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  6. Applied egg-rr98.9%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{s}{\pi}}}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  7. Final simplification98.9%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{1}{\frac{s}{\pi}}}}}\right) \]

Alternative 5: 98.9% accurate, 1.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  (- s)
  (log
   (+
    -1.0
    (/
     1.0
     (+
      (/ u (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI (- s)))))
      (/ (- 1.0 u) (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -s * logf((-1.0f + (1.0f / ((u / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / -s)))) + ((1.0f - u) / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s))))))));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(-1.0) + Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / Float32(-s))))) + Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s)))))))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = -s * log((single(-1.0) + (single(1.0) / ((u / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / -s)))) + ((single(1.0) - u) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s))))))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Final simplification98.9%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right) \]

Alternative 6: 97.4% accurate, 2.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u} + \left(-1 + \frac{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}{u}\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (* (- s) (log (+ (/ 1.0 u) (+ -1.0 (/ (exp (/ (- PI) s)) u))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / u) + (-1.0f + (expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)) / u))));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / u) + Float32(Float32(-1.0) + Float32(exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)) / u)))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / u) + (single(-1.0) + (exp((-single(pi) / s)) / u))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u} + \left(-1 + \frac{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}{u}\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Taylor expanded in s around inf 85.4%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative85.4%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{\pi}{s} + 1\right)}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  5. Simplified85.4%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{\pi}{s} + 1\right)}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  6. Taylor expanded in s around 0 85.4%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \color{blue}{\frac{s \cdot \left(1 - u\right)}{\pi}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  7. Taylor expanded in s around 0 96.7%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(s \cdot \log \left(\left(\frac{1}{u} + \frac{e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}{u}\right) - 1\right)\right)} \]
  8. Step-by-step derivation
    1. mul-1-neg96.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \log \left(\left(\frac{1}{u} + \frac{e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}{u}\right) - 1\right)} \]
    2. distribute-rgt-neg-in96.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\left(\frac{1}{u} + \frac{e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}{u}\right) - 1\right)\right)} \]
    3. associate--l+96.7%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{u} + \left(\frac{e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}{u} - 1\right)\right)}\right) \]
    4. sub-neg96.7%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{u} + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}{u} + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right)\right) \]
    5. associate-*r/96.7%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{u} + \left(\frac{e^{\color{blue}{\frac{-1 \cdot \pi}{s}}}}{u} + \left(-1\right)\right)\right)\right) \]
    6. mul-1-neg96.7%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{u} + \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\color{blue}{-\pi}}{s}}}{u} + \left(-1\right)\right)\right)\right) \]
    7. metadata-eval96.7%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{u} + \left(\frac{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}{u} + \color{blue}{-1}\right)\right)\right) \]
  9. Simplified96.7%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{u} + \left(\frac{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}{u} + -1\right)\right)\right)} \]
  10. Final simplification96.7%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u} + \left(-1 + \frac{e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}}{u}\right)\right) \]

Alternative 7: 25.1% accurate, 3.5× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (* s (- (log (+ -1.0 (/ PI s))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * -logf((-1.0f + (((float) M_PI) / s)));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(-log(Float32(Float32(-1.0) + Float32(Float32(pi) / s)))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * -log((single(-1.0) + (single(pi) / s)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Taylor expanded in s around inf 85.4%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative85.4%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{\pi}{s} + 1\right)}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  5. Simplified85.4%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{\pi}{s} + 1\right)}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  6. Taylor expanded in s around 0 85.4%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \color{blue}{\frac{s \cdot \left(1 - u\right)}{\pi}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  7. Taylor expanded in u around 0 25.4%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(s \cdot \log \left(\frac{\pi}{s} - 1\right)\right)} \]
  8. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate-*r*25.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{\pi}{s} - 1\right)} \]
    2. neg-mul-125.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right)} \cdot \log \left(\frac{\pi}{s} - 1\right) \]
    3. sub-neg25.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{\pi}{s} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]
    4. metadata-eval25.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{\pi}{s} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]
  9. Simplified25.4%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{\pi}{s} + -1\right)} \]
  10. Final simplification25.4%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)\right) \]

Alternative 8: 11.7% accurate, 6.8× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(0.25 + u \cdot -0.5\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (* -4.0 (* PI (+ 0.25 (* u -0.5)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -4.0f * (((float) M_PI) * (0.25f + (u * -0.5f)));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(-4.0) * Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(Float32(0.25) + Float32(u * Float32(-0.5)))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = single(-4.0) * (single(pi) * (single(0.25) + (u * single(-0.5))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
-4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(0.25 + u \cdot -0.5\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \left(\left(-u\right) + 1\right) \cdot \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Taylor expanded in s around -inf 12.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)\right)} \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate--r+12.1%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) - 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
    2. cancel-sign-sub-inv12.1%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
    3. cancel-sign-sub-inv12.1%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + \left(--0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right)} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    4. metadata-eval12.1%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + \color{blue}{0.25} \cdot \pi\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    5. associate-*r*12.1%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot u\right) \cdot \pi} + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    6. distribute-rgt-out12.1%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot u + 0.25\right)} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    7. *-commutative12.1%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(\color{blue}{u \cdot -0.25} + 0.25\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    8. metadata-eval12.1%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right) + \color{blue}{-0.25} \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    9. *-commutative12.1%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right) + \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot -0.25}\right) \]
    10. *-commutative12.1%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right) + \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot u\right)} \cdot -0.25\right) \]
    11. associate-*l*12.1%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right) + \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25\right)}\right) \]
  5. Simplified12.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right) + \pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25\right)\right)} \]
  6. Step-by-step derivation
    1. add-sqr-sqrt11.9%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right) + \pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25\right)} \cdot \sqrt{\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right) + \pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25\right)}\right)} \]
    2. pow211.9%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt{\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right) + \pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25\right)}\right)}^{2}} \]
    3. distribute-lft-out11.9%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot {\left(\sqrt{\color{blue}{\pi \cdot \left(\left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right) + u \cdot -0.25\right)}}\right)}^{2} \]
    4. fma-def11.9%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot {\left(\sqrt{\pi \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(u, -0.25, 0.25\right)} + u \cdot -0.25\right)}\right)}^{2} \]
  7. Applied egg-rr11.9%

    \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt{\pi \cdot \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(u, -0.25, 0.25\right) + u \cdot -0.25\right)}\right)}^{2}} \]
  8. Taylor expanded in u around 0 12.1%

    \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-0.5 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)} \]
  9. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate-*r*12.1%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-0.5 \cdot u\right) \cdot \pi} + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right) \]
    2. distribute-rgt-out12.1%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot \left(-0.5 \cdot u + 0.25\right)\right)} \]
    3. *-commutative12.1%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(\color{blue}{u \cdot -0.5} + 0.25\right)\right) \]
    4. fma-def12.1%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(u, -0.5, 0.25\right)}\right) \]
  10. Simplified12.1%

    \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(u, -0.5, 0.25\right)\right)} \]
  11. Taylor expanded in u around 0 12.1%

    \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-0.5 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)} \]
  12. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative12.1%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.25 \cdot \pi + -0.5 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
    2. associate-*r*12.1%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(0.25 \cdot \pi + \color{blue}{\left(-0.5 \cdot u\right) \cdot \pi}\right) \]
    3. *-commutative12.1%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(0.25 \cdot \pi + \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot -0.5\right)} \cdot \pi\right) \]
    4. distribute-rgt-out12.1%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot \left(0.25 + u \cdot -0.5\right)\right)} \]
  13. Simplified12.1%

    \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot \left(0.25 + u \cdot -0.5\right)\right)} \]
  14. Final simplification12.1%

    \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(0.25 + u \cdot -0.5\right)\right) \]

Alternative 9: 11.4% accurate, 7.2× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -\pi \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (- PI))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -((float) M_PI);
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(-Float32(pi))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = -single(pi);
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
-\pi
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \left(\left(-u\right) + 1\right) \cdot \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Taylor expanded in u around 0 12.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \pi} \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. neg-mul-112.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\pi} \]
  5. Simplified12.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\pi} \]
  6. Final simplification12.0%

    \[\leadsto -\pi \]

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2023315 
(FPCore (u s)
  :name "Sample trimmed logistic on [-pi, pi]"
  :precision binary32
  :pre (and (and (<= 2.328306437e-10 u) (<= u 1.0)) (and (<= 0.0 s) (<= s 1.0651631)))
  (* (- s) (log (- (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))) (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))) 1.0))))