a parameter of renormalized beta distribution

Percentage Accurate: 99.8% → 99.8%

Time: 6.2s

Alternatives: 9

Speedup: N/A×

• 42.6% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

\[\left(0 < m \land 0 < v\right) \land v < 0.25\]

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (* (- (/ (* m (- 1.0 m)) v) 1.0) m))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * m;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = (((m * (1.0d0 - m)) / v) - 1.0d0) * m
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * m;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * m

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(m * Float64(1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * m)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * m;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(m * N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * m), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (* (- (/ (* m (- 1.0 m)) v) 1.0) m))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * m;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = (((m * (1.0d0 - m)) / v) - 1.0d0) * m
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * m;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * m

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(m * Float64(1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * m)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * m;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(m * N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * m), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.8% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ m \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(m, \frac{1 - m}{v}, -1\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (* m (fma m (/ (- 1.0 m) v) -1.0)))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return m * fma(m, ((1.0 - m) / v), -1.0);
}

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(m * fma(m, Float64(Float64(1.0 - m) / v), -1.0))
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(m * N[(m * N[(N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

   2. associate-*r/ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}} - 1\right) \]

   3. fma-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(m, \frac{1 - m}{v}, -1\right)} \]

   4. metadata-eval 99.9%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(m, \frac{1 - m}{v}, \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(m, \frac{1 - m}{v}, -1\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto m \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(m, \frac{1 - m}{v}, -1\right) \]

Alternative 2: 99.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 6 \cdot 10^{-38}:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \left(\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \frac{m}{v}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 6e-38) (* m (+ -1.0 (/ m v))) (* m (* (- 1.0 m) (/ m v)))))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 6e-38) {
		tmp = m * (-1.0 + (m / v));
	} else {
		tmp = m * ((1.0 - m) * (m / v));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 6d-38) then
        tmp = m * ((-1.0d0) + (m / v))
    else
        tmp = m * ((1.0d0 - m) * (m / v))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 6e-38) {
		tmp = m * (-1.0 + (m / v));
	} else {
		tmp = m * ((1.0 - m) * (m / v));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 6e-38:
		tmp = m * (-1.0 + (m / v))
	else:
		tmp = m * ((1.0 - m) * (m / v))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 6e-38)
		tmp = Float64(m * Float64(-1.0 + Float64(m / v)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(m * Float64(Float64(1.0 - m) * Float64(m / v)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 6e-38)
		tmp = m * (-1.0 + (m / v));
	else
		tmp = m * ((1.0 - m) * (m / v));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[m, 6e-38], N[(m * N[(-1.0 + N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(m * N[(N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision] * N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 5.99999999999999977e-38

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]

   2. Taylor expanded in m around 0 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(\frac{\color{blue}{m}}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]

   if 5.99999999999999977e-38 < m

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-*l/ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + -1\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in v around 0 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{m}^{2} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{m}^{2}}{\frac{v}{1 - m}}} \]

   6. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{m}^{2}}{\frac{v}{1 - m}}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/r/ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{m}^{2}}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \frac{{m}^{2}}{v}} \]

      3. unpow2 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{m \cdot m}}{v} \]

      4. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{m}{\frac{v}{m}}} \]

      5. associate-/r/ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot m\right)} \]

      6. associate-*l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \frac{m}{v}\right) \cdot m} \]

   8. Applied egg-rr 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \frac{m}{v}\right) \cdot m} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 6 \cdot 10^{-38}:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \left(\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \frac{m}{v}\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 99.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 6.4 \cdot 10^{-38}:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 6.4e-38) (* m (+ -1.0 (/ m v))) (* m (* m (/ (- 1.0 m) v)))))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 6.4e-38) {
		tmp = m * (-1.0 + (m / v));
	} else {
		tmp = m * (m * ((1.0 - m) / v));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 6.4d-38) then
        tmp = m * ((-1.0d0) + (m / v))
    else
        tmp = m * (m * ((1.0d0 - m) / v))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 6.4e-38) {
		tmp = m * (-1.0 + (m / v));
	} else {
		tmp = m * (m * ((1.0 - m) / v));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 6.4e-38:
		tmp = m * (-1.0 + (m / v))
	else:
		tmp = m * (m * ((1.0 - m) / v))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 6.4e-38)
		tmp = Float64(m * Float64(-1.0 + Float64(m / v)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(m * Float64(m * Float64(Float64(1.0 - m) / v)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 6.4e-38)
		tmp = m * (-1.0 + (m / v));
	else
		tmp = m * (m * ((1.0 - m) / v));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[m, 6.4e-38], N[(m * N[(-1.0 + N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(m * N[(m * N[(N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 6.39999999999999955e-38

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]

   2. Taylor expanded in m around 0 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(\frac{\color{blue}{m}}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]

   if 6.39999999999999955e-38 < m

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-*l/ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + -1\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in v around 0 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{m}^{2} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{m}^{2}}{\frac{v}{1 - m}}} \]

   6. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{m}^{2}}{\frac{v}{1 - m}}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/r/ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{m}^{2}}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \frac{{m}^{2}}{v}} \]

      3. unpow2 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{m \cdot m}}{v} \]

      4. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{m}{\frac{v}{m}}} \]

      5. associate-/r/ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot m\right)} \]

      6. associate-*l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \frac{m}{v}\right) \cdot m} \]

   8. Applied egg-rr 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \frac{m}{v}\right) \cdot m} \]

   9. Taylor expanded in v around 0 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v}} \cdot m \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. associate-*r/ 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}\right)} \cdot m \]

       2. *-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1 - m}{v} \cdot m\right)} \cdot m \]

   11. Applied egg-rr 99.9%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1 - m}{v} \cdot m\right)} \cdot m \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 6.4 \cdot 10^{-38}:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ m \cdot \left(-1 + \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \frac{m}{v}\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (* m (+ -1.0 (* (- 1.0 m) (/ m v)))))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return m * (-1.0 + ((1.0 - m) * (m / v)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = m * ((-1.0d0) + ((1.0d0 - m) * (m / v)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return m * (-1.0 + ((1.0 - m) * (m / v)));
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return m * (-1.0 + ((1.0 - m) * (m / v)))

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(m * Float64(-1.0 + Float64(Float64(1.0 - m) * Float64(m / v))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = m * (-1.0 + ((1.0 - m) * (m / v)));
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(m * N[(-1.0 + N[(N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision] * N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

   2. sub-neg 99.8%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

   3. associate-*l/ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

   4. metadata-eval 99.9%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + -1\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(-1 + \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \frac{m}{v}\right) \]

Alternative 5: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ m \cdot \left(-1 + m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (* m (+ -1.0 (* m (/ (- 1.0 m) v)))))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return m * (-1.0 + (m * ((1.0 - m) / v)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = m * ((-1.0d0) + (m * ((1.0d0 - m) / v)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return m * (-1.0 + (m * ((1.0 - m) / v)));
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return m * (-1.0 + (m * ((1.0 - m) / v)))

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(m * Float64(-1.0 + Float64(m * Float64(Float64(1.0 - m) / v))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = m * (-1.0 + (m * ((1.0 - m) / v)));
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(m * N[(-1.0 + N[(m * N[(N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-*r/ 80.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}\right)} \cdot m \]

   2. *-commutative 80.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1 - m}{v} \cdot m\right)} \cdot m \]

3. Applied egg-rr 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\frac{1 - m}{v} \cdot m} - 1\right) \cdot m \]

4. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(-1 + m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}\right) \]

Alternative 6: 37.8% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1.65 \cdot 10^{-184} \lor \neg \left(m \leq 1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-m\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \frac{m}{v}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= m 1.65e-184) (not (<= m 1.0))) (- m) (* m (/ m v))))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if ((m <= 1.65e-184) || !(m <= 1.0)) {
		tmp = -m;
	} else {
		tmp = m * (m / v);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((m <= 1.65d-184) .or. (.not. (m <= 1.0d0))) then
        tmp = -m
    else
        tmp = m * (m / v)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if ((m <= 1.65e-184) || !(m <= 1.0)) {
		tmp = -m;
	} else {
		tmp = m * (m / v);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if (m <= 1.65e-184) or not (m <= 1.0):
		tmp = -m
	else:
		tmp = m * (m / v)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((m <= 1.65e-184) || !(m <= 1.0))
		tmp = Float64(-m);
	else
		tmp = Float64(m * Float64(m / v));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((m <= 1.65e-184) || ~((m <= 1.0)))
		tmp = -m;
	else
		tmp = m * (m / v);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[Or[LessEqual[m, 1.65e-184], N[Not[LessEqual[m, 1.0]], $MachinePrecision]], (-m), N[(m * N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 1.6499999999999999e-184 or 1 < m

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-*l/ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + -1\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in m around 0 25.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot m} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 25.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-m} \]

   6. Simplified 25.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-m} \]

   if 1.6499999999999999e-184 < m < 1

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.7%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-*l/ 99.7%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.7%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + -1\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in v around 0 73.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{m}^{2} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 73.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{m}^{2}}{\frac{v}{1 - m}}} \]

   6. Simplified 73.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{m}^{2}}{\frac{v}{1 - m}}} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in m around 0 71.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{m}^{2}}{v}} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 71.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{m \cdot m}}{v} \]

      2. associate-*l/ 79.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot m} \]

   9. Applied egg-rr 79.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot m} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 40.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1.65 \cdot 10^{-184} \lor \neg \left(m \leq 1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-m\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \frac{m}{v}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 7: 37.8% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 4.4 \cdot 10^{-184} \lor \neg \left(m \leq 1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-m\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{m}{\frac{v}{m}}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= m 4.4e-184) (not (<= m 1.0))) (- m) (/ m (/ v m))))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if ((m <= 4.4e-184) || !(m <= 1.0)) {
		tmp = -m;
	} else {
		tmp = m / (v / m);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((m <= 4.4d-184) .or. (.not. (m <= 1.0d0))) then
        tmp = -m
    else
        tmp = m / (v / m)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if ((m <= 4.4e-184) || !(m <= 1.0)) {
		tmp = -m;
	} else {
		tmp = m / (v / m);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if (m <= 4.4e-184) or not (m <= 1.0):
		tmp = -m
	else:
		tmp = m / (v / m)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((m <= 4.4e-184) || !(m <= 1.0))
		tmp = Float64(-m);
	else
		tmp = Float64(m / Float64(v / m));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((m <= 4.4e-184) || ~((m <= 1.0)))
		tmp = -m;
	else
		tmp = m / (v / m);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[Or[LessEqual[m, 4.4e-184], N[Not[LessEqual[m, 1.0]], $MachinePrecision]], (-m), N[(m / N[(v / m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 4.39999999999999984e-184 or 1 < m

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-*l/ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + -1\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in m around 0 25.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot m} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 25.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-m} \]

   6. Simplified 25.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-m} \]

   if 4.39999999999999984e-184 < m < 1

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(\frac{m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-m\right)\right)}}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]

      2. distribute-rgt-in 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(\frac{\color{blue}{1 \cdot m + \left(-m\right) \cdot m}}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]

      3. *-un-lft-identity 99.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(\frac{\color{blue}{m} + \left(-m\right) \cdot m}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]

   3. Applied egg-rr 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(\frac{\color{blue}{m + \left(-m\right) \cdot m}}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]

   4. Taylor expanded in v around 0 73.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m \cdot \left(m + -1 \cdot {m}^{2}\right)}{v}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 81.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m}{\frac{v}{m + -1 \cdot {m}^{2}}}} \]

      2. mul-1-neg 81.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{m}{\frac{v}{m + \color{blue}{\left(-{m}^{2}\right)}}} \]

      3. sub-neg 81.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{m}{\frac{v}{\color{blue}{m - {m}^{2}}}} \]

   6. Simplified 81.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m}{\frac{v}{m - {m}^{2}}}} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in m around 0 79.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{m}{\color{blue}{\frac{v}{m}}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 40.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 4.4 \cdot 10^{-184} \lor \neg \left(m \leq 1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-m\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{m}{\frac{v}{m}}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 8: 51.0% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-m\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (if (<= m 1.0) (* m (+ -1.0 (/ m v))) (- m)))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.0) {
		tmp = m * (-1.0 + (m / v));
	} else {
		tmp = -m;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 1.0d0) then
        tmp = m * ((-1.0d0) + (m / v))
    else
        tmp = -m
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.0) {
		tmp = m * (-1.0 + (m / v));
	} else {
		tmp = -m;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 1.0:
		tmp = m * (-1.0 + (m / v))
	else:
		tmp = -m
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 1.0)
		tmp = Float64(m * Float64(-1.0 + Float64(m / v)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(-m);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 1.0)
		tmp = m * (-1.0 + (m / v));
	else
		tmp = -m;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[m, 1.0], N[(m * N[(-1.0 + N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], (-m)]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 1

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]

   2. Taylor expanded in m around 0 98.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(\frac{\color{blue}{m}}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]

   if 1 < m

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-*l/ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + -1\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in m around 0 5.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot m} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 5.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-m} \]

   6. Simplified 5.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-m} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 49.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;m \cdot \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-m\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 9: 26.5% accurate, 5.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -m \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (- m))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return -m;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = -m
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return -m;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return -m

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(-m)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = -m;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := (-m)

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot m \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

   2. sub-neg 99.8%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

   3. associate-*l/ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

   4. metadata-eval 99.9%

      \[\leadsto m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + -1\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in m around 0 23.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot m} \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. neg-mul-1 23.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-m} \]

6. Simplified 23.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-m} \]

7. Final simplification 23.2%

   \[\leadsto -m \]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023313 
(FPCore (m v)
  :name "a parameter of renormalized beta distribution"
  :precision binary64
  :pre (and (and (< 0.0 m) (< 0.0 v)) (< v 0.25))
  (* (- (/ (* m (- 1.0 m)) v) 1.0) m))