SynthBasics:oscSampleBasedAux from YampaSynth-0.2

Percentage Accurate: 100.0% → 100.0%

Time: 3.7s

Alternatives: 6

Speedup: 1.0×

• 21.8% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* y (- z x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z - x));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (y * (z - x))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z - x));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (y * (z - x))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z - x)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (y * (z - x));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(z - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* y (- z x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z - x));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (y * (z - x))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z - x));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (y * (z - x))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z - x)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (y * (z - x));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(z - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z - x, x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (fma y (- z x) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return fma(y, (z - x), x);
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return fma(y, Float64(z - x), x)
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(y * N[(z - x), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z - x\right) + x} \]

   2. fma-def 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z - x, x\right)} \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z - x, x\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z - x, x\right) \]

Alternative 2: 75.9% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.1 \cdot 10^{-62} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 6.5 \cdot 10^{-64}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -2.1e-62) (not (<= x 6.5e-64))) (* x (- 1.0 y)) (* y z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -2.1e-62) || !(x <= 6.5e-64)) {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - y);
	} else {
		tmp = y * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-2.1d-62)) .or. (.not. (x <= 6.5d-64))) then
        tmp = x * (1.0d0 - y)
    else
        tmp = y * z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -2.1e-62) || !(x <= 6.5e-64)) {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - y);
	} else {
		tmp = y * z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -2.1e-62) or not (x <= 6.5e-64):
		tmp = x * (1.0 - y)
	else:
		tmp = y * z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -2.1e-62) || !(x <= 6.5e-64))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(1.0 - y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * z);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -2.1e-62) || ~((x <= 6.5e-64)))
		tmp = x * (1.0 - y);
	else
		tmp = y * z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -2.1e-62], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 6.5e-64]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * N[(1.0 - y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -2.0999999999999999e-62 or 6.5000000000000004e-64 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 84.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot y\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 84.6%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 84.6%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - y\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 84.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - y\right)} \]

   if -2.0999999999999999e-62 < x < 6.5000000000000004e-64

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around inf 90.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 70.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 79.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -2.1 \cdot 10^{-62} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 6.5 \cdot 10^{-64}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 86.9% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.2 \cdot 10^{-53} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.45 \cdot 10^{-52}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - y\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -2.2e-53) (not (<= z 1.45e-52))) (+ x (* y z)) (* x (- 1.0 y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -2.2e-53) || !(z <= 1.45e-52)) {
		tmp = x + (y * z);
	} else {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-2.2d-53)) .or. (.not. (z <= 1.45d-52))) then
        tmp = x + (y * z)
    else
        tmp = x * (1.0d0 - y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -2.2e-53) || !(z <= 1.45e-52)) {
		tmp = x + (y * z);
	} else {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -2.2e-53) or not (z <= 1.45e-52):
		tmp = x + (y * z)
	else:
		tmp = x * (1.0 - y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -2.2e-53) || !(z <= 1.45e-52))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(1.0 - y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -2.2e-53) || ~((z <= 1.45e-52)))
		tmp = x + (y * z);
	else
		tmp = x * (1.0 - y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -2.2e-53], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 1.45e-52]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * N[(1.0 - y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -2.20000000000000018e-53 or 1.4500000000000001e-52 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around inf 86.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]

   if -2.20000000000000018e-53 < z < 1.4500000000000001e-52

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 92.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot y\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 92.5%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 92.5%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - y\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 92.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 89.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.2 \cdot 10^{-53} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.45 \cdot 10^{-52}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - y\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 60.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2.8 \cdot 10^{-131} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.05 \cdot 10^{-40}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -2.8e-131) (not (<= y 1.05e-40))) (* y z) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -2.8e-131) || !(y <= 1.05e-40)) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-2.8d-131)) .or. (.not. (y <= 1.05d-40))) then
        tmp = y * z
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -2.8e-131) || !(y <= 1.05e-40)) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -2.8e-131) or not (y <= 1.05e-40):
		tmp = y * z
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -2.8e-131) || !(y <= 1.05e-40))
		tmp = Float64(y * z);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -2.8e-131) || ~((y <= 1.05e-40)))
		tmp = y * z;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -2.8e-131], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 1.05e-40]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], x]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -2.8e-131 or 1.05000000000000009e-40 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around inf 55.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 50.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]

   if -2.8e-131 < y < 1.05000000000000009e-40

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around 0 78.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 60.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2.8 \cdot 10^{-131} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.05 \cdot 10^{-40}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* y (- z x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z - x));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (y * (z - x))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z - x));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (y * (z - x))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z - x)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (y * (z - x));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(z - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]

2. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]

Alternative 6: 36.6% accurate, 7.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[x + y \cdot \left(z - x\right) \]

2. Taylor expanded in y around 0 32.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

3. Final simplification 32.7%

   \[\leadsto x \]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023313 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "SynthBasics:oscSampleBasedAux from YampaSynth-0.2"
  :precision binary64
  (+ x (* y (- z x))))