Octave 3.8, jcobi/2

Percentage Accurate: 62.7% → 97.2%

Time: 11.8s

Alternatives: 11

Speedup: 9.5×

Specification

\[\left(\alpha > -1 \land \beta > -1\right) \land i > 0\]

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\\ \frac{\frac{\frac{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) \cdot \left(\beta - \alpha\right)}{t_0}}{t_0 + 2} + 1}{2} \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (alpha beta i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (+ (+ alpha beta) (* 2.0 i))))
   (/ (+ (/ (/ (* (+ alpha beta) (- beta alpha)) t_0) (+ t_0 2.0)) 1.0) 2.0)))

C

double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	double t_0 = (alpha + beta) + (2.0 * i);
	return (((((alpha + beta) * (beta - alpha)) / t_0) / (t_0 + 2.0)) + 1.0) / 2.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(alpha, beta, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: alpha
    real(8), intent (in) :: beta
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: t_0
    t_0 = (alpha + beta) + (2.0d0 * i)
    code = (((((alpha + beta) * (beta - alpha)) / t_0) / (t_0 + 2.0d0)) + 1.0d0) / 2.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	double t_0 = (alpha + beta) + (2.0 * i);
	return (((((alpha + beta) * (beta - alpha)) / t_0) / (t_0 + 2.0)) + 1.0) / 2.0;
}

Python

def code(alpha, beta, i):
	t_0 = (alpha + beta) + (2.0 * i)
	return (((((alpha + beta) * (beta - alpha)) / t_0) / (t_0 + 2.0)) + 1.0) / 2.0

Julia

function code(alpha, beta, i)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(alpha + beta) + Float64(2.0 * i))
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(alpha + beta) * Float64(beta - alpha)) / t_0) / Float64(t_0 + 2.0)) + 1.0) / 2.0)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(alpha, beta, i)
	t_0 = (alpha + beta) + (2.0 * i);
	tmp = (((((alpha + beta) * (beta - alpha)) / t_0) / (t_0 + 2.0)) + 1.0) / 2.0;
end

Wolfram

code[alpha_, beta_, i_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(alpha + beta), $MachinePrecision] + N[(2.0 * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(alpha + beta), $MachinePrecision] * N[(beta - alpha), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / t$95$0), $MachinePrecision] / N[(t$95$0 + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]

Initial Program: 62.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\\ \frac{\frac{\frac{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) \cdot \left(\beta - \alpha\right)}{t_0}}{t_0 + 2} + 1}{2} \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (alpha beta i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (+ (+ alpha beta) (* 2.0 i))))
   (/ (+ (/ (/ (* (+ alpha beta) (- beta alpha)) t_0) (+ t_0 2.0)) 1.0) 2.0)))

C

double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	double t_0 = (alpha + beta) + (2.0 * i);
	return (((((alpha + beta) * (beta - alpha)) / t_0) / (t_0 + 2.0)) + 1.0) / 2.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(alpha, beta, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: alpha
    real(8), intent (in) :: beta
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: t_0
    t_0 = (alpha + beta) + (2.0d0 * i)
    code = (((((alpha + beta) * (beta - alpha)) / t_0) / (t_0 + 2.0d0)) + 1.0d0) / 2.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	double t_0 = (alpha + beta) + (2.0 * i);
	return (((((alpha + beta) * (beta - alpha)) / t_0) / (t_0 + 2.0)) + 1.0) / 2.0;
}

Python

def code(alpha, beta, i):
	t_0 = (alpha + beta) + (2.0 * i)
	return (((((alpha + beta) * (beta - alpha)) / t_0) / (t_0 + 2.0)) + 1.0) / 2.0

Julia

function code(alpha, beta, i)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(alpha + beta) + Float64(2.0 * i))
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(alpha + beta) * Float64(beta - alpha)) / t_0) / Float64(t_0 + 2.0)) + 1.0) / 2.0)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(alpha, beta, i)
	t_0 = (alpha + beta) + (2.0 * i);
	tmp = (((((alpha + beta) * (beta - alpha)) / t_0) / (t_0 + 2.0)) + 1.0) / 2.0;
end

Wolfram

code[alpha_, beta_, i_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(alpha + beta), $MachinePrecision] + N[(2.0 * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(alpha + beta), $MachinePrecision] * N[(beta - alpha), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / t$95$0), $MachinePrecision] / N[(t$95$0 + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]

Alternative 1: 97.2% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\\ \mathbf{if}\;\frac{\frac{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) \cdot \left(\beta - \alpha\right)}{t_0}}{2 + t_0} \leq -0.5:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{\left(\beta - \beta\right) + \left(2 + \left(\beta \cdot 2 + i \cdot 4\right)\right)}{\alpha}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{\frac{\alpha + \beta}{\frac{\alpha + \left(\beta + 2 \cdot i\right)}{\beta - \alpha}}}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + \left(2 + 2 \cdot i\right)} + 1}{2}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (alpha beta i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (+ (+ alpha beta) (* 2.0 i))))
   (if (<= (/ (/ (* (+ alpha beta) (- beta alpha)) t_0) (+ 2.0 t_0)) -0.5)
     (/ (/ (+ (- beta beta) (+ 2.0 (+ (* beta 2.0) (* i 4.0)))) alpha) 2.0)
     (/
      (+
       (/
        (/ (+ alpha beta) (/ (+ alpha (+ beta (* 2.0 i))) (- beta alpha)))
        (+ (+ alpha beta) (+ 2.0 (* 2.0 i))))
       1.0)
      2.0))))

C

double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	double t_0 = (alpha + beta) + (2.0 * i);
	double tmp;
	if (((((alpha + beta) * (beta - alpha)) / t_0) / (2.0 + t_0)) <= -0.5) {
		tmp = (((beta - beta) + (2.0 + ((beta * 2.0) + (i * 4.0)))) / alpha) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = ((((alpha + beta) / ((alpha + (beta + (2.0 * i))) / (beta - alpha))) / ((alpha + beta) + (2.0 + (2.0 * i)))) + 1.0) / 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(alpha, beta, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: alpha
    real(8), intent (in) :: beta
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = (alpha + beta) + (2.0d0 * i)
    if (((((alpha + beta) * (beta - alpha)) / t_0) / (2.0d0 + t_0)) <= (-0.5d0)) then
        tmp = (((beta - beta) + (2.0d0 + ((beta * 2.0d0) + (i * 4.0d0)))) / alpha) / 2.0d0
    else
        tmp = ((((alpha + beta) / ((alpha + (beta + (2.0d0 * i))) / (beta - alpha))) / ((alpha + beta) + (2.0d0 + (2.0d0 * i)))) + 1.0d0) / 2.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	double t_0 = (alpha + beta) + (2.0 * i);
	double tmp;
	if (((((alpha + beta) * (beta - alpha)) / t_0) / (2.0 + t_0)) <= -0.5) {
		tmp = (((beta - beta) + (2.0 + ((beta * 2.0) + (i * 4.0)))) / alpha) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = ((((alpha + beta) / ((alpha + (beta + (2.0 * i))) / (beta - alpha))) / ((alpha + beta) + (2.0 + (2.0 * i)))) + 1.0) / 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(alpha, beta, i):
	t_0 = (alpha + beta) + (2.0 * i)
	tmp = 0
	if ((((alpha + beta) * (beta - alpha)) / t_0) / (2.0 + t_0)) <= -0.5:
		tmp = (((beta - beta) + (2.0 + ((beta * 2.0) + (i * 4.0)))) / alpha) / 2.0
	else:
		tmp = ((((alpha + beta) / ((alpha + (beta + (2.0 * i))) / (beta - alpha))) / ((alpha + beta) + (2.0 + (2.0 * i)))) + 1.0) / 2.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(alpha, beta, i)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(alpha + beta) + Float64(2.0 * i))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(alpha + beta) * Float64(beta - alpha)) / t_0) / Float64(2.0 + t_0)) <= -0.5)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(beta - beta) + Float64(2.0 + Float64(Float64(beta * 2.0) + Float64(i * 4.0)))) / alpha) / 2.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(alpha + beta) / Float64(Float64(alpha + Float64(beta + Float64(2.0 * i))) / Float64(beta - alpha))) / Float64(Float64(alpha + beta) + Float64(2.0 + Float64(2.0 * i)))) + 1.0) / 2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(alpha, beta, i)
	t_0 = (alpha + beta) + (2.0 * i);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((((alpha + beta) * (beta - alpha)) / t_0) / (2.0 + t_0)) <= -0.5)
		tmp = (((beta - beta) + (2.0 + ((beta * 2.0) + (i * 4.0)))) / alpha) / 2.0;
	else
		tmp = ((((alpha + beta) / ((alpha + (beta + (2.0 * i))) / (beta - alpha))) / ((alpha + beta) + (2.0 + (2.0 * i)))) + 1.0) / 2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[alpha_, beta_, i_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(alpha + beta), $MachinePrecision] + N[(2.0 * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(N[(N[(N[(alpha + beta), $MachinePrecision] * N[(beta - alpha), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / t$95$0), $MachinePrecision] / N[(2.0 + t$95$0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], -0.5], N[(N[(N[(N[(beta - beta), $MachinePrecision] + N[(2.0 + N[(N[(beta * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(i * 4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / alpha), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(alpha + beta), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(alpha + N[(beta + N[(2.0 * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(beta - alpha), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(alpha + beta), $MachinePrecision] + N[(2.0 + N[(2.0 * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (/.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 alpha beta) (-.f64 beta alpha)) (+.f64 (+.f64 alpha beta) (*.f64 2 i))) (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 alpha beta) (*.f64 2 i)) 2)) < -0.5

   1. Initial program 2.8%

      \[\frac{\frac{\frac{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) \cdot \left(\beta - \alpha\right)}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i}}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in alpha around inf 92.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{\left(\beta + -1 \cdot \beta\right) - -1 \cdot \left(2 + \left(2 \cdot \beta + 4 \cdot i\right)\right)}{\alpha}}}{2} \]

   if -0.5 < (/.f64 (/.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 alpha beta) (-.f64 beta alpha)) (+.f64 (+.f64 alpha beta) (*.f64 2 i))) (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 alpha beta) (*.f64 2 i)) 2))

   1. Initial program 78.9%

      \[\frac{\frac{\frac{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) \cdot \left(\beta - \alpha\right)}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i}}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{\frac{\alpha + \beta}{\frac{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i}{\beta - \alpha}}}}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\frac{\alpha + \beta}{\frac{\color{blue}{\alpha + \left(\beta + 2 \cdot i\right)}}{\beta - \alpha}}}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]

      3. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\frac{\alpha + \beta}{\frac{\alpha + \left(\beta + 2 \cdot i\right)}{\beta - \alpha}}}{\color{blue}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + \left(2 \cdot i + 2\right)}} + 1}{2} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\frac{\alpha + \beta}{\frac{\alpha + \left(\beta + 2 \cdot i\right)}{\beta - \alpha}}}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + \left(2 \cdot i + 2\right)} + 1}{2}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{\frac{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) \cdot \left(\beta - \alpha\right)}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i}}{2 + \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right)} \leq -0.5:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{\left(\beta - \beta\right) + \left(2 + \left(\beta \cdot 2 + i \cdot 4\right)\right)}{\alpha}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{\frac{\alpha + \beta}{\frac{\alpha + \left(\beta + 2 \cdot i\right)}{\beta - \alpha}}}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + \left(2 + 2 \cdot i\right)} + 1}{2}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 2: 96.4% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\\ \mathbf{if}\;\frac{\frac{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) \cdot \left(\beta - \alpha\right)}{t_0}}{2 + t_0} \leq -0.5:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{\left(\beta - \beta\right) + \left(2 + \left(\beta \cdot 2 + i \cdot 4\right)\right)}{\alpha}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 + \frac{\frac{\alpha + \beta}{\frac{\beta + 2 \cdot i}{\beta}}}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + \left(2 + 2 \cdot i\right)}}{2}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (alpha beta i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (+ (+ alpha beta) (* 2.0 i))))
   (if (<= (/ (/ (* (+ alpha beta) (- beta alpha)) t_0) (+ 2.0 t_0)) -0.5)
     (/ (/ (+ (- beta beta) (+ 2.0 (+ (* beta 2.0) (* i 4.0)))) alpha) 2.0)
     (/
      (+
       1.0
       (/
        (/ (+ alpha beta) (/ (+ beta (* 2.0 i)) beta))
        (+ (+ alpha beta) (+ 2.0 (* 2.0 i)))))
      2.0))))

C

double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	double t_0 = (alpha + beta) + (2.0 * i);
	double tmp;
	if (((((alpha + beta) * (beta - alpha)) / t_0) / (2.0 + t_0)) <= -0.5) {
		tmp = (((beta - beta) + (2.0 + ((beta * 2.0) + (i * 4.0)))) / alpha) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = (1.0 + (((alpha + beta) / ((beta + (2.0 * i)) / beta)) / ((alpha + beta) + (2.0 + (2.0 * i))))) / 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(alpha, beta, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: alpha
    real(8), intent (in) :: beta
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = (alpha + beta) + (2.0d0 * i)
    if (((((alpha + beta) * (beta - alpha)) / t_0) / (2.0d0 + t_0)) <= (-0.5d0)) then
        tmp = (((beta - beta) + (2.0d0 + ((beta * 2.0d0) + (i * 4.0d0)))) / alpha) / 2.0d0
    else
        tmp = (1.0d0 + (((alpha + beta) / ((beta + (2.0d0 * i)) / beta)) / ((alpha + beta) + (2.0d0 + (2.0d0 * i))))) / 2.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	double t_0 = (alpha + beta) + (2.0 * i);
	double tmp;
	if (((((alpha + beta) * (beta - alpha)) / t_0) / (2.0 + t_0)) <= -0.5) {
		tmp = (((beta - beta) + (2.0 + ((beta * 2.0) + (i * 4.0)))) / alpha) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = (1.0 + (((alpha + beta) / ((beta + (2.0 * i)) / beta)) / ((alpha + beta) + (2.0 + (2.0 * i))))) / 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(alpha, beta, i):
	t_0 = (alpha + beta) + (2.0 * i)
	tmp = 0
	if ((((alpha + beta) * (beta - alpha)) / t_0) / (2.0 + t_0)) <= -0.5:
		tmp = (((beta - beta) + (2.0 + ((beta * 2.0) + (i * 4.0)))) / alpha) / 2.0
	else:
		tmp = (1.0 + (((alpha + beta) / ((beta + (2.0 * i)) / beta)) / ((alpha + beta) + (2.0 + (2.0 * i))))) / 2.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(alpha, beta, i)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(alpha + beta) + Float64(2.0 * i))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(alpha + beta) * Float64(beta - alpha)) / t_0) / Float64(2.0 + t_0)) <= -0.5)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(beta - beta) + Float64(2.0 + Float64(Float64(beta * 2.0) + Float64(i * 4.0)))) / alpha) / 2.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 + Float64(Float64(Float64(alpha + beta) / Float64(Float64(beta + Float64(2.0 * i)) / beta)) / Float64(Float64(alpha + beta) + Float64(2.0 + Float64(2.0 * i))))) / 2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(alpha, beta, i)
	t_0 = (alpha + beta) + (2.0 * i);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((((alpha + beta) * (beta - alpha)) / t_0) / (2.0 + t_0)) <= -0.5)
		tmp = (((beta - beta) + (2.0 + ((beta * 2.0) + (i * 4.0)))) / alpha) / 2.0;
	else
		tmp = (1.0 + (((alpha + beta) / ((beta + (2.0 * i)) / beta)) / ((alpha + beta) + (2.0 + (2.0 * i))))) / 2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[alpha_, beta_, i_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(alpha + beta), $MachinePrecision] + N[(2.0 * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(N[(N[(N[(alpha + beta), $MachinePrecision] * N[(beta - alpha), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / t$95$0), $MachinePrecision] / N[(2.0 + t$95$0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], -0.5], N[(N[(N[(N[(beta - beta), $MachinePrecision] + N[(2.0 + N[(N[(beta * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(i * 4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / alpha), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(1.0 + N[(N[(N[(alpha + beta), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(beta + N[(2.0 * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / beta), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(alpha + beta), $MachinePrecision] + N[(2.0 + N[(2.0 * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (/.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 alpha beta) (-.f64 beta alpha)) (+.f64 (+.f64 alpha beta) (*.f64 2 i))) (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 alpha beta) (*.f64 2 i)) 2)) < -0.5

   1. Initial program 2.8%

      \[\frac{\frac{\frac{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) \cdot \left(\beta - \alpha\right)}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i}}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in alpha around inf 92.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{\left(\beta + -1 \cdot \beta\right) - -1 \cdot \left(2 + \left(2 \cdot \beta + 4 \cdot i\right)\right)}{\alpha}}}{2} \]

   if -0.5 < (/.f64 (/.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 alpha beta) (-.f64 beta alpha)) (+.f64 (+.f64 alpha beta) (*.f64 2 i))) (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 alpha beta) (*.f64 2 i)) 2))

   1. Initial program 78.9%

      \[\frac{\frac{\frac{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) \cdot \left(\beta - \alpha\right)}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i}}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{\frac{\alpha + \beta}{\frac{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i}{\beta - \alpha}}}}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\frac{\alpha + \beta}{\frac{\color{blue}{\alpha + \left(\beta + 2 \cdot i\right)}}{\beta - \alpha}}}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]

      3. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\frac{\alpha + \beta}{\frac{\alpha + \left(\beta + 2 \cdot i\right)}{\beta - \alpha}}}{\color{blue}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + \left(2 \cdot i + 2\right)}} + 1}{2} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\frac{\alpha + \beta}{\frac{\alpha + \left(\beta + 2 \cdot i\right)}{\beta - \alpha}}}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + \left(2 \cdot i + 2\right)} + 1}{2}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in alpha around 0 99.6%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\frac{\alpha + \beta}{\color{blue}{\frac{\beta + 2 \cdot i}{\beta}}}}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + \left(2 \cdot i + 2\right)} + 1}{2} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 97.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{\frac{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) \cdot \left(\beta - \alpha\right)}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i}}{2 + \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right)} \leq -0.5:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{\left(\beta - \beta\right) + \left(2 + \left(\beta \cdot 2 + i \cdot 4\right)\right)}{\alpha}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 + \frac{\frac{\alpha + \beta}{\frac{\beta + 2 \cdot i}{\beta}}}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + \left(2 + 2 \cdot i\right)}}{2}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 88.0% accurate, 1.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \beta + 2 \cdot i\\ \mathbf{if}\;\alpha \leq 2.7 \cdot 10^{+137}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 + \frac{\beta}{2 + \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right)}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{t_0 + \left(2 + t_0\right)}{\alpha}}{2}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (alpha beta i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (+ beta (* 2.0 i))))
   (if (<= alpha 2.7e+137)
     (/ (+ 1.0 (/ beta (+ 2.0 (+ (+ alpha beta) (* 2.0 i))))) 2.0)
     (/ (/ (+ t_0 (+ 2.0 t_0)) alpha) 2.0))))

C

double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	double t_0 = beta + (2.0 * i);
	double tmp;
	if (alpha <= 2.7e+137) {
		tmp = (1.0 + (beta / (2.0 + ((alpha + beta) + (2.0 * i))))) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = ((t_0 + (2.0 + t_0)) / alpha) / 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(alpha, beta, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: alpha
    real(8), intent (in) :: beta
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = beta + (2.0d0 * i)
    if (alpha <= 2.7d+137) then
        tmp = (1.0d0 + (beta / (2.0d0 + ((alpha + beta) + (2.0d0 * i))))) / 2.0d0
    else
        tmp = ((t_0 + (2.0d0 + t_0)) / alpha) / 2.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	double t_0 = beta + (2.0 * i);
	double tmp;
	if (alpha <= 2.7e+137) {
		tmp = (1.0 + (beta / (2.0 + ((alpha + beta) + (2.0 * i))))) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = ((t_0 + (2.0 + t_0)) / alpha) / 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(alpha, beta, i):
	t_0 = beta + (2.0 * i)
	tmp = 0
	if alpha <= 2.7e+137:
		tmp = (1.0 + (beta / (2.0 + ((alpha + beta) + (2.0 * i))))) / 2.0
	else:
		tmp = ((t_0 + (2.0 + t_0)) / alpha) / 2.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(alpha, beta, i)
	t_0 = Float64(beta + Float64(2.0 * i))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (alpha <= 2.7e+137)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 + Float64(beta / Float64(2.0 + Float64(Float64(alpha + beta) + Float64(2.0 * i))))) / 2.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(t_0 + Float64(2.0 + t_0)) / alpha) / 2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(alpha, beta, i)
	t_0 = beta + (2.0 * i);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (alpha <= 2.7e+137)
		tmp = (1.0 + (beta / (2.0 + ((alpha + beta) + (2.0 * i))))) / 2.0;
	else
		tmp = ((t_0 + (2.0 + t_0)) / alpha) / 2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[alpha_, beta_, i_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(beta + N[(2.0 * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[alpha, 2.7e+137], N[(N[(1.0 + N[(beta / N[(2.0 + N[(N[(alpha + beta), $MachinePrecision] + N[(2.0 * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(N[(t$95$0 + N[(2.0 + t$95$0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / alpha), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if alpha < 2.70000000000000017e137

   1. Initial program 75.6%

      \[\frac{\frac{\frac{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) \cdot \left(\beta - \alpha\right)}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i}}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in beta around inf 92.6%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{\beta}}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]

   if 2.70000000000000017e137 < alpha

   1. Initial program 4.9%

      \[\frac{\frac{\frac{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) \cdot \left(\beta - \alpha\right)}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i}}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

   3. Simplified 25.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{\alpha + \beta}{\alpha + \left(\beta + \mathsf{fma}\left(2, i, 2\right)\right)}, \frac{\beta - \alpha}{\alpha + \mathsf{fma}\left(2, i, \beta\right)}, 1\right)}{2}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in alpha around inf 80.2%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{\left(2 + \left(\beta + 2 \cdot i\right)\right) - -1 \cdot \left(\beta + 2 \cdot i\right)}{\alpha}}}{2} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 89.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\alpha \leq 2.7 \cdot 10^{+137}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 + \frac{\beta}{2 + \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right)}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{\left(\beta + 2 \cdot i\right) + \left(2 + \left(\beta + 2 \cdot i\right)\right)}{\alpha}}{2}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 88.0% accurate, 1.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\alpha \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+137}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 + \frac{\beta}{2 + \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right)}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{\left(\beta - \beta\right) + \left(2 + \left(\beta \cdot 2 + i \cdot 4\right)\right)}{\alpha}}{2}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (alpha beta i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= alpha 4e+137)
   (/ (+ 1.0 (/ beta (+ 2.0 (+ (+ alpha beta) (* 2.0 i))))) 2.0)
   (/ (/ (+ (- beta beta) (+ 2.0 (+ (* beta 2.0) (* i 4.0)))) alpha) 2.0)))

C

double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (alpha <= 4e+137) {
		tmp = (1.0 + (beta / (2.0 + ((alpha + beta) + (2.0 * i))))) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = (((beta - beta) + (2.0 + ((beta * 2.0) + (i * 4.0)))) / alpha) / 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(alpha, beta, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: alpha
    real(8), intent (in) :: beta
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (alpha <= 4d+137) then
        tmp = (1.0d0 + (beta / (2.0d0 + ((alpha + beta) + (2.0d0 * i))))) / 2.0d0
    else
        tmp = (((beta - beta) + (2.0d0 + ((beta * 2.0d0) + (i * 4.0d0)))) / alpha) / 2.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (alpha <= 4e+137) {
		tmp = (1.0 + (beta / (2.0 + ((alpha + beta) + (2.0 * i))))) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = (((beta - beta) + (2.0 + ((beta * 2.0) + (i * 4.0)))) / alpha) / 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(alpha, beta, i):
	tmp = 0
	if alpha <= 4e+137:
		tmp = (1.0 + (beta / (2.0 + ((alpha + beta) + (2.0 * i))))) / 2.0
	else:
		tmp = (((beta - beta) + (2.0 + ((beta * 2.0) + (i * 4.0)))) / alpha) / 2.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(alpha, beta, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (alpha <= 4e+137)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 + Float64(beta / Float64(2.0 + Float64(Float64(alpha + beta) + Float64(2.0 * i))))) / 2.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(beta - beta) + Float64(2.0 + Float64(Float64(beta * 2.0) + Float64(i * 4.0)))) / alpha) / 2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(alpha, beta, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (alpha <= 4e+137)
		tmp = (1.0 + (beta / (2.0 + ((alpha + beta) + (2.0 * i))))) / 2.0;
	else
		tmp = (((beta - beta) + (2.0 + ((beta * 2.0) + (i * 4.0)))) / alpha) / 2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[alpha_, beta_, i_] := If[LessEqual[alpha, 4e+137], N[(N[(1.0 + N[(beta / N[(2.0 + N[(N[(alpha + beta), $MachinePrecision] + N[(2.0 * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(N[(N[(beta - beta), $MachinePrecision] + N[(2.0 + N[(N[(beta * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(i * 4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / alpha), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if alpha < 4.0000000000000001e137

   1. Initial program 75.6%

      \[\frac{\frac{\frac{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) \cdot \left(\beta - \alpha\right)}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i}}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in beta around inf 92.6%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{\beta}}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]

   if 4.0000000000000001e137 < alpha

   1. Initial program 4.9%

      \[\frac{\frac{\frac{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) \cdot \left(\beta - \alpha\right)}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i}}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in alpha around inf 80.3%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{\left(\beta + -1 \cdot \beta\right) - -1 \cdot \left(2 + \left(2 \cdot \beta + 4 \cdot i\right)\right)}{\alpha}}}{2} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 89.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\alpha \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+137}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 + \frac{\beta}{2 + \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right)}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{\left(\beta - \beta\right) + \left(2 + \left(\beta \cdot 2 + i \cdot 4\right)\right)}{\alpha}}{2}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 85.1% accurate, 1.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\alpha \leq 1.3 \cdot 10^{+154}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 + \frac{\beta}{2 + \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right)}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{2 + i \cdot 4}{\alpha}}{2}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (alpha beta i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= alpha 1.3e+154)
   (/ (+ 1.0 (/ beta (+ 2.0 (+ (+ alpha beta) (* 2.0 i))))) 2.0)
   (/ (/ (+ 2.0 (* i 4.0)) alpha) 2.0)))

C

double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (alpha <= 1.3e+154) {
		tmp = (1.0 + (beta / (2.0 + ((alpha + beta) + (2.0 * i))))) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = ((2.0 + (i * 4.0)) / alpha) / 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(alpha, beta, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: alpha
    real(8), intent (in) :: beta
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (alpha <= 1.3d+154) then
        tmp = (1.0d0 + (beta / (2.0d0 + ((alpha + beta) + (2.0d0 * i))))) / 2.0d0
    else
        tmp = ((2.0d0 + (i * 4.0d0)) / alpha) / 2.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (alpha <= 1.3e+154) {
		tmp = (1.0 + (beta / (2.0 + ((alpha + beta) + (2.0 * i))))) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = ((2.0 + (i * 4.0)) / alpha) / 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(alpha, beta, i):
	tmp = 0
	if alpha <= 1.3e+154:
		tmp = (1.0 + (beta / (2.0 + ((alpha + beta) + (2.0 * i))))) / 2.0
	else:
		tmp = ((2.0 + (i * 4.0)) / alpha) / 2.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(alpha, beta, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (alpha <= 1.3e+154)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 + Float64(beta / Float64(2.0 + Float64(Float64(alpha + beta) + Float64(2.0 * i))))) / 2.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(2.0 + Float64(i * 4.0)) / alpha) / 2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(alpha, beta, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (alpha <= 1.3e+154)
		tmp = (1.0 + (beta / (2.0 + ((alpha + beta) + (2.0 * i))))) / 2.0;
	else
		tmp = ((2.0 + (i * 4.0)) / alpha) / 2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[alpha_, beta_, i_] := If[LessEqual[alpha, 1.3e+154], N[(N[(1.0 + N[(beta / N[(2.0 + N[(N[(alpha + beta), $MachinePrecision] + N[(2.0 * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(N[(2.0 + N[(i * 4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / alpha), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if alpha < 1.29999999999999994e154

   1. Initial program 74.8%

      \[\frac{\frac{\frac{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) \cdot \left(\beta - \alpha\right)}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i}}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in beta around inf 91.4%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{\beta}}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]

   if 1.29999999999999994e154 < alpha

   1. Initial program 1.2%

      \[\frac{\frac{\frac{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) \cdot \left(\beta - \alpha\right)}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i}}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in alpha around inf 81.9%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{\left(\beta + -1 \cdot \beta\right) - -1 \cdot \left(2 + \left(2 \cdot \beta + 4 \cdot i\right)\right)}{\alpha}}}{2} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in beta around 0 64.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{2 + 4 \cdot i}{\alpha}}}{2} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 64.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{2 + \color{blue}{i \cdot 4}}{\alpha}}{2} \]

   5. Simplified 64.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{2 + i \cdot 4}{\alpha}}}{2} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 85.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\alpha \leq 1.3 \cdot 10^{+154}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 + \frac{\beta}{2 + \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right)}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{2 + i \cdot 4}{\alpha}}{2}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6: 79.7% accurate, 2.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\alpha \leq 1.4 \cdot 10^{+154}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 + \frac{\beta}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{2 + i \cdot 4}{\alpha}}{2}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (alpha beta i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= alpha 1.4e+154)
   (/ (+ 1.0 (/ beta (+ (+ alpha beta) 2.0))) 2.0)
   (/ (/ (+ 2.0 (* i 4.0)) alpha) 2.0)))

C

double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (alpha <= 1.4e+154) {
		tmp = (1.0 + (beta / ((alpha + beta) + 2.0))) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = ((2.0 + (i * 4.0)) / alpha) / 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(alpha, beta, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: alpha
    real(8), intent (in) :: beta
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (alpha <= 1.4d+154) then
        tmp = (1.0d0 + (beta / ((alpha + beta) + 2.0d0))) / 2.0d0
    else
        tmp = ((2.0d0 + (i * 4.0d0)) / alpha) / 2.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (alpha <= 1.4e+154) {
		tmp = (1.0 + (beta / ((alpha + beta) + 2.0))) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = ((2.0 + (i * 4.0)) / alpha) / 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(alpha, beta, i):
	tmp = 0
	if alpha <= 1.4e+154:
		tmp = (1.0 + (beta / ((alpha + beta) + 2.0))) / 2.0
	else:
		tmp = ((2.0 + (i * 4.0)) / alpha) / 2.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(alpha, beta, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (alpha <= 1.4e+154)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 + Float64(beta / Float64(Float64(alpha + beta) + 2.0))) / 2.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(2.0 + Float64(i * 4.0)) / alpha) / 2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(alpha, beta, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (alpha <= 1.4e+154)
		tmp = (1.0 + (beta / ((alpha + beta) + 2.0))) / 2.0;
	else
		tmp = ((2.0 + (i * 4.0)) / alpha) / 2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[alpha_, beta_, i_] := If[LessEqual[alpha, 1.4e+154], N[(N[(1.0 + N[(beta / N[(N[(alpha + beta), $MachinePrecision] + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(N[(2.0 + N[(i * 4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / alpha), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if alpha < 1.4e154

   1. Initial program 74.8%

      \[\frac{\frac{\frac{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) \cdot \left(\beta - \alpha\right)}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i}}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in beta around inf 91.4%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{\beta}}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in i around 0 84.9%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{\beta}{2 + \left(\alpha + \beta\right)}} + 1}{2} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 84.9%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\beta}{2 + \color{blue}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right)}} + 1}{2} \]

   5. Simplified 84.9%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{\beta}{2 + \left(\beta + \alpha\right)}} + 1}{2} \]

   if 1.4e154 < alpha

   1. Initial program 1.2%

      \[\frac{\frac{\frac{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) \cdot \left(\beta - \alpha\right)}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i}}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in alpha around inf 81.9%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{\left(\beta + -1 \cdot \beta\right) - -1 \cdot \left(2 + \left(2 \cdot \beta + 4 \cdot i\right)\right)}{\alpha}}}{2} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in beta around 0 64.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{2 + 4 \cdot i}{\alpha}}}{2} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 64.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{2 + \color{blue}{i \cdot 4}}{\alpha}}{2} \]

   5. Simplified 64.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{2 + i \cdot 4}{\alpha}}}{2} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 80.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\alpha \leq 1.4 \cdot 10^{+154}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 + \frac{\beta}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{2 + i \cdot 4}{\alpha}}{2}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 7: 75.5% accurate, 2.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;i \leq 1.95 \cdot 10^{+146}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 + \frac{\beta}{\beta + 2}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (alpha beta i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= i 1.95e+146) (/ (+ 1.0 (/ beta (+ beta 2.0))) 2.0) 0.5))

C

double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (i <= 1.95e+146) {
		tmp = (1.0 + (beta / (beta + 2.0))) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = 0.5;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(alpha, beta, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: alpha
    real(8), intent (in) :: beta
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (i <= 1.95d+146) then
        tmp = (1.0d0 + (beta / (beta + 2.0d0))) / 2.0d0
    else
        tmp = 0.5d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (i <= 1.95e+146) {
		tmp = (1.0 + (beta / (beta + 2.0))) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = 0.5;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(alpha, beta, i):
	tmp = 0
	if i <= 1.95e+146:
		tmp = (1.0 + (beta / (beta + 2.0))) / 2.0
	else:
		tmp = 0.5
	return tmp

Julia

function code(alpha, beta, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (i <= 1.95e+146)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 + Float64(beta / Float64(beta + 2.0))) / 2.0);
	else
		tmp = 0.5;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(alpha, beta, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (i <= 1.95e+146)
		tmp = (1.0 + (beta / (beta + 2.0))) / 2.0;
	else
		tmp = 0.5;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[alpha_, beta_, i_] := If[LessEqual[i, 1.95e+146], N[(N[(1.0 + N[(beta / N[(beta + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision], 0.5]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if i < 1.95e146

   1. Initial program 55.8%

      \[\frac{\frac{\frac{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) \cdot \left(\beta - \alpha\right)}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i}}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in alpha around 0 55.5%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{{\beta}^{2}}{\left(2 + \left(\beta + 2 \cdot i\right)\right) \cdot \left(\beta + 2 \cdot i\right)}} + 1}{2} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in i around 0 71.4%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{\beta}{2 + \beta}} + 1}{2} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 71.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\beta}{\color{blue}{\beta + 2}} + 1}{2} \]

   5. Simplified 71.4%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{\beta}{\beta + 2}} + 1}{2} \]

   if 1.95e146 < i

   1. Initial program 74.2%

      \[\frac{\frac{\frac{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) \cdot \left(\beta - \alpha\right)}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i}}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in i around inf 86.5%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1}}{2} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 75.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;i \leq 1.95 \cdot 10^{+146}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 + \frac{\beta}{\beta + 2}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 8: 77.1% accurate, 2.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\alpha \leq 4.1 \cdot 10^{+139}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 + \frac{\beta}{\beta + 2}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{2 + \beta \cdot 2}{\alpha}}{2}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (alpha beta i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= alpha 4.1e+139)
   (/ (+ 1.0 (/ beta (+ beta 2.0))) 2.0)
   (/ (/ (+ 2.0 (* beta 2.0)) alpha) 2.0)))

C

double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (alpha <= 4.1e+139) {
		tmp = (1.0 + (beta / (beta + 2.0))) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = ((2.0 + (beta * 2.0)) / alpha) / 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(alpha, beta, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: alpha
    real(8), intent (in) :: beta
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (alpha <= 4.1d+139) then
        tmp = (1.0d0 + (beta / (beta + 2.0d0))) / 2.0d0
    else
        tmp = ((2.0d0 + (beta * 2.0d0)) / alpha) / 2.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (alpha <= 4.1e+139) {
		tmp = (1.0 + (beta / (beta + 2.0))) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = ((2.0 + (beta * 2.0)) / alpha) / 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(alpha, beta, i):
	tmp = 0
	if alpha <= 4.1e+139:
		tmp = (1.0 + (beta / (beta + 2.0))) / 2.0
	else:
		tmp = ((2.0 + (beta * 2.0)) / alpha) / 2.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(alpha, beta, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (alpha <= 4.1e+139)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 + Float64(beta / Float64(beta + 2.0))) / 2.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(2.0 + Float64(beta * 2.0)) / alpha) / 2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(alpha, beta, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (alpha <= 4.1e+139)
		tmp = (1.0 + (beta / (beta + 2.0))) / 2.0;
	else
		tmp = ((2.0 + (beta * 2.0)) / alpha) / 2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[alpha_, beta_, i_] := If[LessEqual[alpha, 4.1e+139], N[(N[(1.0 + N[(beta / N[(beta + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(N[(2.0 + N[(beta * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / alpha), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if alpha < 4.1000000000000002e139

   1. Initial program 75.6%

      \[\frac{\frac{\frac{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) \cdot \left(\beta - \alpha\right)}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i}}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in alpha around 0 74.9%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{{\beta}^{2}}{\left(2 + \left(\beta + 2 \cdot i\right)\right) \cdot \left(\beta + 2 \cdot i\right)}} + 1}{2} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in i around 0 85.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{\beta}{2 + \beta}} + 1}{2} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 85.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\beta}{\color{blue}{\beta + 2}} + 1}{2} \]

   5. Simplified 85.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{\beta}{\beta + 2}} + 1}{2} \]

   if 4.1000000000000002e139 < alpha

   1. Initial program 4.9%

      \[\frac{\frac{\frac{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) \cdot \left(\beta - \alpha\right)}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i}}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in i around 0 13.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{2 + \left(\alpha + \beta\right)}} + 1}{2} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 13.8%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{2 + \color{blue}{\left(\beta + \alpha\right)}} + 1}{2} \]

   4. Simplified 13.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{2 + \left(\beta + \alpha\right)}} + 1}{2} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in alpha around inf 54.4%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{2 + 2 \cdot \beta}{\alpha}}}{2} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 78.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\alpha \leq 4.1 \cdot 10^{+139}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 + \frac{\beta}{\beta + 2}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{2 + \beta \cdot 2}{\alpha}}{2}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 9: 79.5% accurate, 2.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\alpha \leq 2.7 \cdot 10^{+139}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 + \frac{\beta}{\beta + 2}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{2 + i \cdot 4}{\alpha}}{2}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (alpha beta i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= alpha 2.7e+139)
   (/ (+ 1.0 (/ beta (+ beta 2.0))) 2.0)
   (/ (/ (+ 2.0 (* i 4.0)) alpha) 2.0)))

C

double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (alpha <= 2.7e+139) {
		tmp = (1.0 + (beta / (beta + 2.0))) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = ((2.0 + (i * 4.0)) / alpha) / 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(alpha, beta, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: alpha
    real(8), intent (in) :: beta
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (alpha <= 2.7d+139) then
        tmp = (1.0d0 + (beta / (beta + 2.0d0))) / 2.0d0
    else
        tmp = ((2.0d0 + (i * 4.0d0)) / alpha) / 2.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (alpha <= 2.7e+139) {
		tmp = (1.0 + (beta / (beta + 2.0))) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = ((2.0 + (i * 4.0)) / alpha) / 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(alpha, beta, i):
	tmp = 0
	if alpha <= 2.7e+139:
		tmp = (1.0 + (beta / (beta + 2.0))) / 2.0
	else:
		tmp = ((2.0 + (i * 4.0)) / alpha) / 2.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(alpha, beta, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (alpha <= 2.7e+139)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 + Float64(beta / Float64(beta + 2.0))) / 2.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(2.0 + Float64(i * 4.0)) / alpha) / 2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(alpha, beta, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (alpha <= 2.7e+139)
		tmp = (1.0 + (beta / (beta + 2.0))) / 2.0;
	else
		tmp = ((2.0 + (i * 4.0)) / alpha) / 2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[alpha_, beta_, i_] := If[LessEqual[alpha, 2.7e+139], N[(N[(1.0 + N[(beta / N[(beta + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(N[(2.0 + N[(i * 4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / alpha), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if alpha < 2.6999999999999998e139

   1. Initial program 75.6%

      \[\frac{\frac{\frac{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) \cdot \left(\beta - \alpha\right)}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i}}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in alpha around 0 74.9%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{{\beta}^{2}}{\left(2 + \left(\beta + 2 \cdot i\right)\right) \cdot \left(\beta + 2 \cdot i\right)}} + 1}{2} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in i around 0 85.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{\beta}{2 + \beta}} + 1}{2} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 85.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\beta}{\color{blue}{\beta + 2}} + 1}{2} \]

   5. Simplified 85.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{\beta}{\beta + 2}} + 1}{2} \]

   if 2.6999999999999998e139 < alpha

   1. Initial program 4.9%

      \[\frac{\frac{\frac{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) \cdot \left(\beta - \alpha\right)}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i}}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in alpha around inf 80.3%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{\left(\beta + -1 \cdot \beta\right) - -1 \cdot \left(2 + \left(2 \cdot \beta + 4 \cdot i\right)\right)}{\alpha}}}{2} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in beta around 0 61.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{2 + 4 \cdot i}{\alpha}}}{2} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 61.1%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{2 + \color{blue}{i \cdot 4}}{\alpha}}{2} \]

   5. Simplified 61.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{2 + i \cdot 4}{\alpha}}}{2} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 80.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\alpha \leq 2.7 \cdot 10^{+139}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 + \frac{\beta}{\beta + 2}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{2 + i \cdot 4}{\alpha}}{2}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 10: 72.4% accurate, 9.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\beta \leq 9.5 \cdot 10^{+32}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (alpha beta i) :precision binary64 (if (<= beta 9.5e+32) 0.5 1.0))

C

double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (beta <= 9.5e+32) {
		tmp = 0.5;
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(alpha, beta, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: alpha
    real(8), intent (in) :: beta
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (beta <= 9.5d+32) then
        tmp = 0.5d0
    else
        tmp = 1.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (beta <= 9.5e+32) {
		tmp = 0.5;
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(alpha, beta, i):
	tmp = 0
	if beta <= 9.5e+32:
		tmp = 0.5
	else:
		tmp = 1.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(alpha, beta, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (beta <= 9.5e+32)
		tmp = 0.5;
	else
		tmp = 1.0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(alpha, beta, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (beta <= 9.5e+32)
		tmp = 0.5;
	else
		tmp = 1.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[alpha_, beta_, i_] := If[LessEqual[beta, 9.5e+32], 0.5, 1.0]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if beta < 9.50000000000000006e32

   1. Initial program 71.2%

      \[\frac{\frac{\frac{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) \cdot \left(\beta - \alpha\right)}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i}}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in i around inf 71.6%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1}}{2} \]

   if 9.50000000000000006e32 < beta

   1. Initial program 37.4%

      \[\frac{\frac{\frac{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) \cdot \left(\beta - \alpha\right)}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i}}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in beta around inf 74.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{2}}{2} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 72.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\beta \leq 9.5 \cdot 10^{+32}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;1\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 11: 61.6% accurate, 29.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 0.5 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (alpha beta i) :precision binary64 0.5)

C

double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	return 0.5;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(alpha, beta, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: alpha
    real(8), intent (in) :: beta
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = 0.5d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	return 0.5;
}

Python

def code(alpha, beta, i):
	return 0.5

Julia

function code(alpha, beta, i)
	return 0.5
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(alpha, beta, i)
	tmp = 0.5;
end

Wolfram

code[alpha_, beta_, i_] := 0.5

Derivation

1. Initial program 60.1%

   \[\frac{\frac{\frac{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) \cdot \left(\beta - \alpha\right)}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i}}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]

2. Taylor expanded in i around inf 56.9%

   \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1}}{2} \]

3. Final simplification 56.9%

   \[\leadsto 0.5 \]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023312 
(FPCore (alpha beta i)
  :name "Octave 3.8, jcobi/2"
  :precision binary64
  :pre (and (and (> alpha -1.0) (> beta -1.0)) (> i 0.0))
  (/ (+ (/ (/ (* (+ alpha beta) (- beta alpha)) (+ (+ alpha beta) (* 2.0 i))) (+ (+ (+ alpha beta) (* 2.0 i)) 2.0)) 1.0) 2.0))