System.Random.MWC.Distributions:truncatedExp from mwc-random-0.13.3.2

Percentage Accurate: 62.0% → 98.3%

Time: 13.9s

Alternatives: 8

Speedup: 211.0×

• could not determine a ground truth

  1. x = -2.8045635606015847e+171
  2. y = 2.804117964391137e-248
  3. z = 9.663285973693732e+196
  4. t = 3.509784827441506e-89

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- x (/ (log (+ (- 1.0 y) (* y (exp z)))) t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (log(((1.0 - y) + (y * exp(z)))) / t);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x - (log(((1.0d0 - y) + (y * exp(z)))) / t)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (Math.log(((1.0 - y) + (y * Math.exp(z)))) / t);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - (math.log(((1.0 - y) + (y * math.exp(z)))) / t)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(log(Float64(Float64(1.0 - y) + Float64(y * exp(z)))) / t))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x - (log(((1.0 - y) + (y * exp(z)))) / t);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(N[Log[N[(N[(1.0 - y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * N[Exp[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 62.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- x (/ (log (+ (- 1.0 y) (* y (exp z)))) t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (log(((1.0 - y) + (y * exp(z)))) / t);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x - (log(((1.0d0 - y) + (y * exp(z)))) / t)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (Math.log(((1.0 - y) + (y * Math.exp(z)))) / t);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - (math.log(((1.0 - y) + (y * math.exp(z)))) / t)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(log(Float64(Float64(1.0 - y) + Float64(y * exp(z)))) / t))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x - (log(((1.0 - y) + (y * exp(z)))) / t);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(N[Log[N[(N[(1.0 - y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * N[Exp[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- x (/ (log1p (* y (expm1 z))) t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (log1p((y * expm1(z))) / t);
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (Math.log1p((y * Math.expm1(z))) / t);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - (math.log1p((y * math.expm1(z))) / t)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(log1p(Float64(y * expm1(z))) / t))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(N[Log[1 + N[(y * N[(Exp[z] - 1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 60.4%

   \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 60.4%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

   2. associate-+l+ 73.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

   3. cancel-sign-sub 73.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   4. log1p-def 79.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}}{t} \]

   5. cancel-sign-sub 79.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

   6. +-commutative 79.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   7. unsub-neg 79.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

   8. *-rgt-identity 79.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

   9. distribute-lft-out-- 79.6%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   10. expm1-def 98.9%

       \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

3. Simplified 98.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]

4. Final simplification 98.9%

   \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t} \]

Alternative 2: 84.1% accurate, 2.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}{\frac{t}{y}} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- x (/ (expm1 z) (/ t y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (expm1(z) / (t / y));
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (Math.expm1(z) / (t / y));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - (math.expm1(z) / (t / y))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(expm1(z) / Float64(t / y)))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(N[(Exp[z] - 1), $MachinePrecision] / N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 60.4%

   \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 60.4%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

   2. associate-+l+ 73.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

   3. cancel-sign-sub 73.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   4. log1p-def 79.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}}{t} \]

   5. cancel-sign-sub 79.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

   6. +-commutative 79.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   7. unsub-neg 79.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

   8. *-rgt-identity 79.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

   9. distribute-lft-out-- 79.6%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   10. expm1-def 98.9%

       \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

3. Simplified 98.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]

4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 75.0%

   \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}}{t} \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. expm1-def 87.7%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}}{t} \]

6. Simplified 87.7%

   \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}}{t} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-un-lft-identity 87.7%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}{\color{blue}{1 \cdot t}} \]

   2. times-frac 88.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{1} \cdot \frac{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}{t}} \]

8. Applied egg-rr 88.5%

   \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{1} \cdot \frac{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}{t}} \]
9. Step-by-step derivation

   1. clear-num 88.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{1}{y}}} \cdot \frac{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}{t} \]

   2. frac-times 87.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}{\frac{1}{y} \cdot t}} \]

   3. *-un-lft-identity 87.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}}{\frac{1}{y} \cdot t} \]

   4. associate-/r/ 87.0%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{y}{t}}}} \]

   5. clear-num 87.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}{\color{blue}{\frac{t}{y}}} \]

10. Applied egg-rr 87.5%

    \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}{\frac{t}{y}}} \]

11. Final simplification 87.5%

    \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}{\frac{t}{y}} \]

Alternative 3: 85.6% accurate, 2.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}{t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- x (/ (* y (expm1 z)) t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - ((y * expm1(z)) / t);
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - ((y * Math.expm1(z)) / t);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - ((y * math.expm1(z)) / t)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(Float64(y * expm1(z)) / t))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(N[(y * N[(Exp[z] - 1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 60.4%

   \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 60.4%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

   2. associate-+l+ 73.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

   3. cancel-sign-sub 73.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   4. log1p-def 79.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}}{t} \]

   5. cancel-sign-sub 79.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

   6. +-commutative 79.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   7. unsub-neg 79.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

   8. *-rgt-identity 79.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

   9. distribute-lft-out-- 79.6%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   10. expm1-def 98.9%

       \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

3. Simplified 98.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]

4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 75.0%

   \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}}{t} \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. expm1-def 87.7%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}}{t} \]

6. Simplified 87.7%

   \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}}{t} \]

7. Final simplification 87.7%

   \[\leadsto x - \frac{y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}{t} \]

Alternative 4: 86.6% accurate, 2.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}{t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- x (* y (/ (expm1 z) t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (y * (expm1(z) / t));
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (y * (Math.expm1(z) / t));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - (y * (math.expm1(z) / t))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(y * Float64(expm1(z) / t)))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(y * N[(N[(Exp[z] - 1), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 60.4%

   \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 60.4%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

   2. associate-+l+ 73.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

   3. cancel-sign-sub 73.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   4. log1p-def 79.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}}{t} \]

   5. cancel-sign-sub 79.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

   6. +-commutative 79.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   7. unsub-neg 79.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

   8. *-rgt-identity 79.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

   9. distribute-lft-out-- 79.6%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   10. expm1-def 98.9%

       \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

3. Simplified 98.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]

4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 75.0%

   \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}}{t} \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. expm1-def 87.7%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}}{t} \]

6. Simplified 87.7%

   \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}}{t} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-un-lft-identity 87.7%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}{\color{blue}{1 \cdot t}} \]

   2. times-frac 88.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{1} \cdot \frac{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}{t}} \]

8. Applied egg-rr 88.5%

   \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{1} \cdot \frac{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}{t}} \]

9. Final simplification 88.5%

   \[\leadsto x - y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}{t} \]

Alternative 5: 79.8% accurate, 23.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -7.2 \cdot 10^{-5}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - z \cdot \frac{y}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -7.2e-5) x (- x (* z (/ y t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -7.2e-5) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x - (z * (y / t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-7.2d-5)) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = x - (z * (y / t))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -7.2e-5) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x - (z * (y / t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -7.2e-5:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = x - (z * (y / t))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -7.2e-5)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(z * Float64(y / t)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -7.2e-5)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = x - (z * (y / t));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[z, -7.2e-5], x, N[(x - N[(z * N[(y / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -7.20000000000000018e-5

   1. Initial program 78.0%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 78.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 78.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. cancel-sign-sub 78.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      4. log1p-def 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}}{t} \]

      5. cancel-sign-sub 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. +-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      7. unsub-neg 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      8. *-rgt-identity 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      9. distribute-lft-out-- 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      10. expm1-def 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 82.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}}{t} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. expm1-def 82.5%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}}{t} \]

   6. Simplified 82.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}}{t} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in z around 0 21.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot {z}^{2}\right) + y \cdot z}}{t} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in z around inf 20.7%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \frac{y \cdot {z}^{2}}{t}} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 20.6%

         \[\leadsto x - 0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{t}{{z}^{2}}}} \]

   10. Simplified 20.6%

       \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \frac{y}{\frac{t}{{z}^{2}}}} \]

   11. Taylor expanded in x around inf 64.6%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -7.20000000000000018e-5 < z

   1. Initial program 54.1%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 54.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 72.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. cancel-sign-sub 72.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      4. log1p-def 72.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}}{t} \]

      5. cancel-sign-sub 72.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. +-commutative 72.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      7. unsub-neg 72.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      8. *-rgt-identity 72.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      9. distribute-lft-out-- 72.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      10. expm1-def 98.6%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 98.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 89.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot z}{t}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 90.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{t}{z}}} \]

   6. Simplified 90.7%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{t}{z}}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/r/ 88.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{t} \cdot z} \]

   8. Applied egg-rr 88.6%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{t} \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 82.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -7.2 \cdot 10^{-5}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - z \cdot \frac{y}{t}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6: 82.8% accurate, 23.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -0.000195:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - y \cdot \frac{z}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -0.000195) x (- x (* y (/ z t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -0.000195) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x - (y * (z / t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-0.000195d0)) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = x - (y * (z / t))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -0.000195) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x - (y * (z / t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -0.000195:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = x - (y * (z / t))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -0.000195)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(y * Float64(z / t)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -0.000195)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = x - (y * (z / t));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[z, -0.000195], x, N[(x - N[(y * N[(z / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.94999999999999996e-4

   1. Initial program 78.0%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 78.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 78.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. cancel-sign-sub 78.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      4. log1p-def 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}}{t} \]

      5. cancel-sign-sub 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. +-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      7. unsub-neg 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      8. *-rgt-identity 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      9. distribute-lft-out-- 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      10. expm1-def 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 82.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}}{t} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. expm1-def 82.5%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}}{t} \]

   6. Simplified 82.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}}{t} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in z around 0 21.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot {z}^{2}\right) + y \cdot z}}{t} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in z around inf 20.7%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \frac{y \cdot {z}^{2}}{t}} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 20.6%

         \[\leadsto x - 0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{t}{{z}^{2}}}} \]

   10. Simplified 20.6%

       \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \frac{y}{\frac{t}{{z}^{2}}}} \]

   11. Taylor expanded in x around inf 64.6%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -1.94999999999999996e-4 < z

   1. Initial program 54.1%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 54.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 72.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. cancel-sign-sub 72.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      4. log1p-def 72.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}}{t} \]

      5. cancel-sign-sub 72.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. +-commutative 72.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      7. unsub-neg 72.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      8. *-rgt-identity 72.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      9. distribute-lft-out-- 72.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      10. expm1-def 98.6%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 98.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 89.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot z}{t}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 90.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{t}{z}}} \]

   6. Simplified 90.7%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{t}{z}}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. clear-num 90.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{\frac{t}{z}}{y}}} \]

      2. associate-/r/ 90.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{t}{z}} \cdot y} \]

      3. clear-num 90.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{z}{t}} \cdot y \]

   8. Applied egg-rr 90.7%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{z}{t} \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 83.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -0.000195:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - y \cdot \frac{z}{t}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 7: 82.8% accurate, 23.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -8 \cdot 10^{-5}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{\frac{t}{z}}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (if (<= z -8e-5) x (- x (/ y (/ t z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -8e-5) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x - (y / (t / z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-8d-5)) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = x - (y / (t / z))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -8e-5) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x - (y / (t / z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -8e-5:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = x - (y / (t / z))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -8e-5)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(y / Float64(t / z)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -8e-5)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = x - (y / (t / z));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[z, -8e-5], x, N[(x - N[(y / N[(t / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -8.00000000000000065e-5

   1. Initial program 78.0%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 78.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 78.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. cancel-sign-sub 78.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      4. log1p-def 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}}{t} \]

      5. cancel-sign-sub 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. +-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      7. unsub-neg 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      8. *-rgt-identity 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      9. distribute-lft-out-- 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      10. expm1-def 99.8%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 82.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}}{t} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. expm1-def 82.5%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}}{t} \]

   6. Simplified 82.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}}{t} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in z around 0 21.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot {z}^{2}\right) + y \cdot z}}{t} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in z around inf 20.7%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \frac{y \cdot {z}^{2}}{t}} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 20.6%

         \[\leadsto x - 0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{t}{{z}^{2}}}} \]

   10. Simplified 20.6%

       \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \frac{y}{\frac{t}{{z}^{2}}}} \]

   11. Taylor expanded in x around inf 64.6%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -8.00000000000000065e-5 < z

   1. Initial program 54.1%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 54.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 72.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. cancel-sign-sub 72.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      4. log1p-def 72.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}}{t} \]

      5. cancel-sign-sub 72.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. +-commutative 72.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      7. unsub-neg 72.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      8. *-rgt-identity 72.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      9. distribute-lft-out-- 72.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      10. expm1-def 98.6%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 98.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 89.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot z}{t}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 90.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{t}{z}}} \]

   6. Simplified 90.7%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{t}{z}}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 83.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -8 \cdot 10^{-5}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{\frac{t}{z}}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 8: 72.0% accurate, 211.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 60.4%

   \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 60.4%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

   2. associate-+l+ 73.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

   3. cancel-sign-sub 73.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   4. log1p-def 79.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}}{t} \]

   5. cancel-sign-sub 79.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

   6. +-commutative 79.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   7. unsub-neg 79.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

   8. *-rgt-identity 79.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

   9. distribute-lft-out-- 79.6%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   10. expm1-def 98.9%

       \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

3. Simplified 98.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]

4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 75.0%

   \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}}{t} \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. expm1-def 87.7%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}}{t} \]

6. Simplified 87.7%

   \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}}{t} \]

7. Taylor expanded in z around 0 71.7%

   \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot {z}^{2}\right) + y \cdot z}}{t} \]

8. Taylor expanded in z around inf 58.5%

   \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \frac{y \cdot {z}^{2}}{t}} \]
9. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-/l* 58.5%

      \[\leadsto x - 0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{t}{{z}^{2}}}} \]

10. Simplified 58.5%

    \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \frac{y}{\frac{t}{{z}^{2}}}} \]

11. Taylor expanded in x around inf 69.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

12. Final simplification 69.9%

    \[\leadsto x \]

Developer target: 74.7% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \frac{-0.5}{y \cdot t}\\ \mathbf{if}\;z < -2.8874623088207947 \cdot 10^{+119}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x - \frac{t_1}{z \cdot z}\right) - t_1 \cdot \frac{\frac{2}{z}}{z \cdot z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{\log \left(1 + z \cdot y\right)}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (/ (- 0.5) (* y t))))
   (if (< z -2.8874623088207947e+119)
     (- (- x (/ t_1 (* z z))) (* t_1 (/ (/ 2.0 z) (* z z))))
     (- x (/ (log (+ 1.0 (* z y))) t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = -0.5 / (y * t);
	double tmp;
	if (z < -2.8874623088207947e+119) {
		tmp = (x - (t_1 / (z * z))) - (t_1 * ((2.0 / z) / (z * z)));
	} else {
		tmp = x - (log((1.0 + (z * y))) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = -0.5d0 / (y * t)
    if (z < (-2.8874623088207947d+119)) then
        tmp = (x - (t_1 / (z * z))) - (t_1 * ((2.0d0 / z) / (z * z)))
    else
        tmp = x - (log((1.0d0 + (z * y))) / t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = -0.5 / (y * t);
	double tmp;
	if (z < -2.8874623088207947e+119) {
		tmp = (x - (t_1 / (z * z))) - (t_1 * ((2.0 / z) / (z * z)));
	} else {
		tmp = x - (Math.log((1.0 + (z * y))) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	t_1 = -0.5 / (y * t)
	tmp = 0
	if z < -2.8874623088207947e+119:
		tmp = (x - (t_1 / (z * z))) - (t_1 * ((2.0 / z) / (z * z)))
	else:
		tmp = x - (math.log((1.0 + (z * y))) / t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(-0.5) / Float64(y * t))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z < -2.8874623088207947e+119)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x - Float64(t_1 / Float64(z * z))) - Float64(t_1 * Float64(Float64(2.0 / z) / Float64(z * z))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(log(Float64(1.0 + Float64(z * y))) / t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = -0.5 / (y * t);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z < -2.8874623088207947e+119)
		tmp = (x - (t_1 / (z * z))) - (t_1 * ((2.0 / z) / (z * z)));
	else
		tmp = x - (log((1.0 + (z * y))) / t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[((-0.5) / N[(y * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Less[z, -2.8874623088207947e+119], N[(N[(x - N[(t$95$1 / N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(t$95$1 * N[(N[(2.0 / z), $MachinePrecision] / N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x - N[(N[Log[N[(1.0 + N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023312 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "System.Random.MWC.Distributions:truncatedExp from mwc-random-0.13.3.2"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (if (< z -2.8874623088207947e+119) (- (- x (/ (/ (- 0.5) (* y t)) (* z z))) (* (/ (- 0.5) (* y t)) (/ (/ 2.0 z) (* z z)))) (- x (/ (log (+ 1.0 (* z y))) t)))

  (- x (/ (log (+ (- 1.0 y) (* y (exp z)))) t)))