b parameter of renormalized beta distribution

Percentage Accurate: 99.9% → 99.9%

Time: 5.0s

Alternatives: 8

Speedup: 1.0×

• 42.2% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

\[\left(0 < m \land 0 < v\right) \land v < 0.25\]

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (* (- (/ (* m (- 1.0 m)) v) 1.0) (- 1.0 m)))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = (((m * (1.0d0 - m)) / v) - 1.0d0) * (1.0d0 - m)
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m);
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m)

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(m * Float64(1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * Float64(1.0 - m))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m);
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(m * N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (* (- (/ (* m (- 1.0 m)) v) 1.0) (- 1.0 m)))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = (((m * (1.0d0 - m)) / v) - 1.0d0) * (1.0d0 - m)
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m);
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m)

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(m * Float64(1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * Float64(1.0 - m))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m);
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(m * N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \frac{m}{v} + -1\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (* (- 1.0 m) (+ (* (- 1.0 m) (/ m v)) -1.0)))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return (1.0 - m) * (((1.0 - m) * (m / v)) + -1.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = (1.0d0 - m) * (((1.0d0 - m) * (m / v)) + (-1.0d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return (1.0 - m) * (((1.0 - m) * (m / v)) + -1.0);
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return (1.0 - m) * (((1.0 - m) * (m / v)) + -1.0)

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(Float64(1.0 - m) * Float64(Float64(Float64(1.0 - m) * Float64(m / v)) + -1.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = (1.0 - m) * (((1.0 - m) * (m / v)) + -1.0);
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision] * N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

   2. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

   3. associate-*l/ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

   4. metadata-eval 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + -1\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \frac{m}{v} + -1\right) \]

Alternative 2: 97.9% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(-1 + \frac{m}{\frac{-v}{m}}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 1.0)
   (* (- 1.0 m) (+ (/ m v) -1.0))
   (* (- 1.0 m) (+ -1.0 (/ m (/ (- v) m))))))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.0) {
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * ((m / v) + -1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * (-1.0 + (m / (-v / m)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 1.0d0) then
        tmp = (1.0d0 - m) * ((m / v) + (-1.0d0))
    else
        tmp = (1.0d0 - m) * ((-1.0d0) + (m / (-v / m)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.0) {
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * ((m / v) + -1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * (-1.0 + (m / (-v / m)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 1.0:
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * ((m / v) + -1.0)
	else:
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * (-1.0 + (m / (-v / m)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 1.0)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 - m) * Float64(Float64(m / v) + -1.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 - m) * Float64(-1.0 + Float64(m / Float64(Float64(-v) / m))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 1.0)
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * ((m / v) + -1.0);
	else
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * (-1.0 + (m / (-v / m)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[m, 1.0], N[(N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision] * N[(-1.0 + N[(m / N[((-v) / m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 1

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in m around 0 97.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(\frac{\color{blue}{m}}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]

   if 1 < m

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}} + -1\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in m around inf 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{v}{m}}} + -1\right) \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 99.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{\color{blue}{\frac{-1 \cdot v}{m}}} + -1\right) \]

      2. neg-mul-1 99.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{\frac{\color{blue}{-v}}{m}} + -1\right) \]

   6. Simplified 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{\color{blue}{\frac{-v}{m}}} + -1\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(-1 + \frac{m}{\frac{-v}{m}}\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 97.9% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(m \cdot m\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 1.0) (* (- 1.0 m) (+ (/ m v) -1.0)) (* (/ m v) (* m m))))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.0) {
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * ((m / v) + -1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = (m / v) * (m * m);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 1.0d0) then
        tmp = (1.0d0 - m) * ((m / v) + (-1.0d0))
    else
        tmp = (m / v) * (m * m)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.0) {
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * ((m / v) + -1.0);
	} else {
		tmp = (m / v) * (m * m);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 1.0:
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * ((m / v) + -1.0)
	else:
		tmp = (m / v) * (m * m)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 1.0)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 - m) * Float64(Float64(m / v) + -1.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(m / v) * Float64(m * m));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 1.0)
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * ((m / v) + -1.0);
	else
		tmp = (m / v) * (m * m);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[m, 1.0], N[(N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision] * N[(m * m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 1

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in m around 0 97.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(\frac{\color{blue}{m}}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]

   if 1 < m

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-*l/ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + -1\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in m around inf 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{m}^{3}}{v}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. div-inv 98.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{m}^{3} \cdot \frac{1}{v}} \]

      2. unpow3 98.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(m \cdot m\right) \cdot m\right)} \cdot \frac{1}{v} \]

      3. associate-*l* 98.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(m \cdot m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1}{v}\right)} \]

      4. pow2 98.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{m}^{2}} \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1}{v}\right) \]

      5. div-inv 99.0%

         \[\leadsto {m}^{2} \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{m}{v}} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{m}^{2} \cdot \frac{m}{v}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 99.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(m \cdot m\right)} \cdot \frac{m}{v} \]

   8. Applied egg-rr 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(m \cdot m\right)} \cdot \frac{m}{v} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(m \cdot m\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 97.8% accurate, 1.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 2.7:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{m}{v} + -1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(m \cdot m\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 2.7) (+ (/ m v) -1.0) (* (/ m v) (* m m))))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 2.7) {
		tmp = (m / v) + -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = (m / v) * (m * m);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 2.7d0) then
        tmp = (m / v) + (-1.0d0)
    else
        tmp = (m / v) * (m * m)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 2.7) {
		tmp = (m / v) + -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = (m / v) * (m * m);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 2.7:
		tmp = (m / v) + -1.0
	else:
		tmp = (m / v) * (m * m)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 2.7)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(m / v) + -1.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(m / v) * Float64(m * m));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 2.7)
		tmp = (m / v) + -1.0;
	else
		tmp = (m / v) * (m * m);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[m, 2.7], N[(N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision] * N[(m * m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 2.7000000000000002

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-*l/ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + -1\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in m around 0 96.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{v}\right) - 1} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in v around 0 97.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m}{v}} - 1 \]

   if 2.7000000000000002 < m

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-*l/ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + -1\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in m around inf 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{{m}^{3}}{v}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. div-inv 98.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{m}^{3} \cdot \frac{1}{v}} \]

      2. unpow3 98.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(m \cdot m\right) \cdot m\right)} \cdot \frac{1}{v} \]

      3. associate-*l* 98.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(m \cdot m\right) \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1}{v}\right)} \]

      4. pow2 98.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{m}^{2}} \cdot \left(m \cdot \frac{1}{v}\right) \]

      5. div-inv 99.0%

         \[\leadsto {m}^{2} \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{m}{v}} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{m}^{2} \cdot \frac{m}{v}} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 99.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(m \cdot m\right)} \cdot \frac{m}{v} \]

   8. Applied egg-rr 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(m \cdot m\right)} \cdot \frac{m}{v} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 2.7:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{m}{v} + -1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(m \cdot m\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 62.4% accurate, 2.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1.9 \cdot 10^{-124}:\\ \;\;\;\;-1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{m}{v}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (if (<= m 1.9e-124) -1.0 (/ m v)))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.9e-124) {
		tmp = -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = m / v;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 1.9d-124) then
        tmp = -1.0d0
    else
        tmp = m / v
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.9e-124) {
		tmp = -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = m / v;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 1.9e-124:
		tmp = -1.0
	else:
		tmp = m / v
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 1.9e-124)
		tmp = -1.0;
	else
		tmp = Float64(m / v);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 1.9e-124)
		tmp = -1.0;
	else
		tmp = m / v;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[m, 1.9e-124], -1.0, N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 1.90000000000000006e-124

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-*l/ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + -1\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in m around 0 73.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1} \]

   if 1.90000000000000006e-124 < m

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in m around 0 24.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(\frac{\color{blue}{m}}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]

   3. Taylor expanded in v around 0 17.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 17.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}}} \]

   5. Simplified 17.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}}} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in m around 0 58.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{m}{\color{blue}{v}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 62.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1.9 \cdot 10^{-124}:\\ \;\;\;\;-1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{m}{v}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6: 75.9% accurate, 2.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{m}{v} + -1 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (+ (/ m v) -1.0))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return (m / v) + -1.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = (m / v) + (-1.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return (m / v) + -1.0;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return (m / v) + -1.0

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(Float64(m / v) + -1.0)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = (m / v) + -1.0;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

   2. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

   3. associate-*l/ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

   4. metadata-eval 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + -1\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in m around 0 75.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{v}\right) - 1} \]

5. Taylor expanded in v around 0 75.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m}{v}} - 1 \]

6. Final simplification 75.5%

   \[\leadsto \frac{m}{v} + -1 \]

Alternative 7: 26.7% accurate, 4.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ m + -1 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (+ m -1.0))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return m + -1.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = m + (-1.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return m + -1.0;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return m + -1.0

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(m + -1.0)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = m + -1.0;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(m + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

   2. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

   3. associate-*l/ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

   4. metadata-eval 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + -1\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in v around inf 28.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. neg-mul-1 28.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\left(1 - m\right)} \]

   2. neg-sub0 28.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0 - \left(1 - m\right)} \]

   3. associate--r- 28.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(0 - 1\right) + m} \]

   4. metadata-eval 28.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1} + m \]

6. Simplified 28.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 + m} \]

7. Final simplification 28.2%

   \[\leadsto m + -1 \]

Alternative 8: 24.2% accurate, 13.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -1 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 -1.0)

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return -1.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = -1.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return -1.0;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return -1.0

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return -1.0
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = -1.0;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := -1.0

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

   2. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

   3. associate-*l/ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

   4. metadata-eval 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 - m\right) + -1\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in m around 0 25.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1} \]

5. Final simplification 25.5%

   \[\leadsto -1 \]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023311 
(FPCore (m v)
  :name "b parameter of renormalized beta distribution"
  :precision binary64
  :pre (and (and (< 0.0 m) (< 0.0 v)) (< v 0.25))
  (* (- (/ (* m (- 1.0 m)) v) 1.0) (- 1.0 m)))