Diagrams.Solve.Polynomial:quartForm from diagrams-solve-0.1, B

Percentage Accurate: 100.0% → 100.0%

Time: 5.2s

Alternatives: 9

Speedup: 1.2×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (- (* (/ 1.0 8.0) x) (/ (* y z) 2.0)) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((1.0 / 8.0) * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0)) + t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (((1.0d0 / 8.0d0) * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0d0)) + t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((1.0 / 8.0) * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0)) + t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((1.0 / 8.0) * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0)) + t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(1.0 / 8.0) * x) - Float64(Float64(y * z) / 2.0)) + t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((1.0 / 8.0) * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0)) + t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(1.0 / 8.0), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (- (* (/ 1.0 8.0) x) (/ (* y z) 2.0)) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((1.0 / 8.0) * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0)) + t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (((1.0d0 / 8.0d0) * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0d0)) + t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((1.0 / 8.0) * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0)) + t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((1.0 / 8.0) * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0)) + t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(1.0 / 8.0) * x) - Float64(Float64(y * z) / 2.0)) + t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((1.0 / 8.0) * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0)) + t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(1.0 / 8.0), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(0.125, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{y}{-2}, z, t\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (fma 0.125 x (fma (/ y -2.0) z t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return fma(0.125, x, fma((y / -2.0), z, t));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return fma(0.125, x, fma(Float64(y / -2.0), z, t))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(0.125 * x + N[(N[(y / -2.0), $MachinePrecision] * z + t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x + \left(-\frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right)\right)} + t \]

   2. associate-+l+ 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{8} \cdot x + \left(\left(-\frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t\right)} \]

   3. fma-def 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1}{8}, x, \left(-\frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t\right)} \]

   4. metadata-eval 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{0.125}, x, \left(-\frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t\right) \]

   5. associate-/l* 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(0.125, x, \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}}\right) + t\right) \]

   6. distribute-frac-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(0.125, x, \color{blue}{\frac{-y}{\frac{2}{z}}} + t\right) \]

   7. associate-/r/ 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(0.125, x, \color{blue}{\frac{-y}{2} \cdot z} + t\right) \]

   8. fma-def 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(0.125, x, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{-y}{2}, z, t\right)}\right) \]

   9. neg-mul-1 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(0.125, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot y}}{2}, z, t\right)\right) \]

   10. *-commutative 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(0.125, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot -1}}{2}, z, t\right)\right) \]

   11. associate-/l* 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(0.125, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{2}{-1}}}, z, t\right)\right) \]

   12. metadata-eval 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(0.125, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{-2}}, z, t\right)\right) \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.125, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{y}{-2}, z, t\right)\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(0.125, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{y}{-2}, z, t\right)\right) \]

Alternative 2: 87.0% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \cdot z \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+64} \lor \neg \left(y \cdot z \leq 10^{-59}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;t - \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot 0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t + 0.125 \cdot x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* y z) -5e+64) (not (<= (* y z) 1e-59)))
   (- t (* (* y z) 0.5))
   (+ t (* 0.125 x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (((y * z) <= -5e+64) || !((y * z) <= 1e-59)) {
		tmp = t - ((y * z) * 0.5);
	} else {
		tmp = t + (0.125 * x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((y * z) <= (-5d+64)) .or. (.not. ((y * z) <= 1d-59))) then
        tmp = t - ((y * z) * 0.5d0)
    else
        tmp = t + (0.125d0 * x)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (((y * z) <= -5e+64) || !((y * z) <= 1e-59)) {
		tmp = t - ((y * z) * 0.5);
	} else {
		tmp = t + (0.125 * x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if ((y * z) <= -5e+64) or not ((y * z) <= 1e-59):
		tmp = t - ((y * z) * 0.5)
	else:
		tmp = t + (0.125 * x)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(y * z) <= -5e+64) || !(Float64(y * z) <= 1e-59))
		tmp = Float64(t - Float64(Float64(y * z) * 0.5));
	else
		tmp = Float64(t + Float64(0.125 * x));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((y * z) <= -5e+64) || ~(((y * z) <= 1e-59)))
		tmp = t - ((y * z) * 0.5);
	else
		tmp = t + (0.125 * x);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], -5e+64], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], 1e-59]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(t - N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(t + N[(0.125 * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 y z) < -5e64 or 1e-59 < (*.f64 y z)

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x + \left(-\frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right)\right)} + t \]

      2. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right)} + t \]

      3. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{0.125} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]

      4. associate-/l* 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(0.125 \cdot x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}}\right) + t \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(0.125 \cdot x - \frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}\right) + t} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 85.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t - 0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]

   if -5e64 < (*.f64 y z) < 1e-59

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x + \left(-\frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right)\right)} + t \]

      2. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right)} + t \]

      3. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{0.125} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]

      4. associate-/l* 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(0.125 \cdot x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}}\right) + t \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(0.125 \cdot x - \frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}\right) + t} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 93.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t + 0.125 \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 89.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \cdot z \leq -5 \cdot 10^{+64} \lor \neg \left(y \cdot z \leq 10^{-59}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;t - \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot 0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t + 0.125 \cdot x\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 69.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-50} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.6 \cdot 10^{+96} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 5.4 \cdot 10^{+256}\right) \land z \leq 7 \cdot 10^{+274}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t + 0.125 \cdot x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -1e-50)
         (not (or (<= z 1.6e+96) (and (not (<= z 5.4e+256)) (<= z 7e+274)))))
   (* z (* y -0.5))
   (+ t (* 0.125 x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1e-50) || !((z <= 1.6e+96) || (!(z <= 5.4e+256) && (z <= 7e+274)))) {
		tmp = z * (y * -0.5);
	} else {
		tmp = t + (0.125 * x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-1d-50)) .or. (.not. (z <= 1.6d+96) .or. (.not. (z <= 5.4d+256)) .and. (z <= 7d+274))) then
        tmp = z * (y * (-0.5d0))
    else
        tmp = t + (0.125d0 * x)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1e-50) || !((z <= 1.6e+96) || (!(z <= 5.4e+256) && (z <= 7e+274)))) {
		tmp = z * (y * -0.5);
	} else {
		tmp = t + (0.125 * x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -1e-50) or not ((z <= 1.6e+96) or (not (z <= 5.4e+256) and (z <= 7e+274))):
		tmp = z * (y * -0.5)
	else:
		tmp = t + (0.125 * x)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -1e-50) || !((z <= 1.6e+96) || (!(z <= 5.4e+256) && (z <= 7e+274))))
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(y * -0.5));
	else
		tmp = Float64(t + Float64(0.125 * x));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -1e-50) || ~(((z <= 1.6e+96) || (~((z <= 5.4e+256)) && (z <= 7e+274)))))
		tmp = z * (y * -0.5);
	else
		tmp = t + (0.125 * x);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -1e-50], N[Not[Or[LessEqual[z, 1.6e+96], And[N[Not[LessEqual[z, 5.4e+256]], $MachinePrecision], LessEqual[z, 7e+274]]]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z * N[(y * -0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(t + N[(0.125 * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.00000000000000001e-50 or 1.60000000000000003e96 < z < 5.3999999999999999e256 or 6.9999999999999993e274 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x + \left(-\frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right)\right)} + t \]

      2. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right)} + t \]

      3. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{0.125} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]

      4. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(0.125 \cdot x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}}\right) + t \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(0.125 \cdot x - \frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}\right) + t} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 64.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 64.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot -0.5} \]

      2. *-commutative 64.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y\right)} \cdot -0.5 \]

      3. associate-*l* 64.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.5\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 64.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.5\right)} \]

   if -1.00000000000000001e-50 < z < 1.60000000000000003e96 or 5.3999999999999999e256 < z < 6.9999999999999993e274

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x + \left(-\frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right)\right)} + t \]

      2. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right)} + t \]

      3. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{0.125} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]

      4. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(0.125 \cdot x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}}\right) + t \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(0.125 \cdot x - \frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}\right) + t} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 79.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t + 0.125 \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 72.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-50} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.6 \cdot 10^{+96} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 5.4 \cdot 10^{+256}\right) \land z \leq 7 \cdot 10^{+274}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t + 0.125 \cdot x\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 81.6% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot 0.5\\ \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -2.2 \cdot 10^{-121}:\\ \;\;\;\;t - t_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 6.4 \cdot 10^{+155}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.125 \cdot x - t_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t + 0.125 \cdot x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* (* y z) 0.5)))
   (if (<= t -2.2e-121)
     (- t t_1)
     (if (<= t 6.4e+155) (- (* 0.125 x) t_1) (+ t (* 0.125 x))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = (y * z) * 0.5;
	double tmp;
	if (t <= -2.2e-121) {
		tmp = t - t_1;
	} else if (t <= 6.4e+155) {
		tmp = (0.125 * x) - t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = t + (0.125 * x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = (y * z) * 0.5d0
    if (t <= (-2.2d-121)) then
        tmp = t - t_1
    else if (t <= 6.4d+155) then
        tmp = (0.125d0 * x) - t_1
    else
        tmp = t + (0.125d0 * x)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = (y * z) * 0.5;
	double tmp;
	if (t <= -2.2e-121) {
		tmp = t - t_1;
	} else if (t <= 6.4e+155) {
		tmp = (0.125 * x) - t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = t + (0.125 * x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	t_1 = (y * z) * 0.5
	tmp = 0
	if t <= -2.2e-121:
		tmp = t - t_1
	elif t <= 6.4e+155:
		tmp = (0.125 * x) - t_1
	else:
		tmp = t + (0.125 * x)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(y * z) * 0.5)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t <= -2.2e-121)
		tmp = Float64(t - t_1);
	elseif (t <= 6.4e+155)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(0.125 * x) - t_1);
	else
		tmp = Float64(t + Float64(0.125 * x));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = (y * z) * 0.5;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t <= -2.2e-121)
		tmp = t - t_1;
	elseif (t <= 6.4e+155)
		tmp = (0.125 * x) - t_1;
	else
		tmp = t + (0.125 * x);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t, -2.2e-121], N[(t - t$95$1), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t, 6.4e+155], N[(N[(0.125 * x), $MachinePrecision] - t$95$1), $MachinePrecision], N[(t + N[(0.125 * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if t < -2.20000000000000021e-121

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x + \left(-\frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right)\right)} + t \]

      2. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right)} + t \]

      3. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{0.125} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]

      4. associate-/l* 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(0.125 \cdot x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}}\right) + t \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(0.125 \cdot x - \frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}\right) + t} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 84.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t - 0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]

   if -2.20000000000000021e-121 < t < 6.40000000000000024e155

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x + \left(-\frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right)\right)} + t \]

      2. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right)} + t \]

      3. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{0.125} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]

      4. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(0.125 \cdot x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}}\right) + t \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(0.125 \cdot x - \frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}\right) + t} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in t around 0 91.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.125 \cdot x - 0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]

   if 6.40000000000000024e155 < t

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x + \left(-\frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right)\right)} + t \]

      2. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right)} + t \]

      3. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{0.125} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]

      4. associate-/l* 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(0.125 \cdot x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}}\right) + t \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(0.125 \cdot x - \frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}\right) + t} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 96.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t + 0.125 \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 89.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -2.2 \cdot 10^{-121}:\\ \;\;\;\;t - \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot 0.5\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 6.4 \cdot 10^{+155}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.125 \cdot x - \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot 0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t + 0.125 \cdot x\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 99.9% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ t + \left(0.125 \cdot x - \frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ t (- (* 0.125 x) (/ y (/ 2.0 z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return t + ((0.125 * x) - (y / (2.0 / z)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = t + ((0.125d0 * x) - (y / (2.0d0 / z)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return t + ((0.125 * x) - (y / (2.0 / z)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return t + ((0.125 * x) - (y / (2.0 / z)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(t + Float64(Float64(0.125 * x) - Float64(y / Float64(2.0 / z))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = t + ((0.125 * x) - (y / (2.0 / z)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(t + N[(N[(0.125 * x), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y / N[(2.0 / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x + \left(-\frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right)\right)} + t \]

   2. sub-neg 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right)} + t \]

   3. metadata-eval 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{0.125} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]

   4. associate-/l* 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(0.125 \cdot x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}}\right) + t \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(0.125 \cdot x - \frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}\right) + t} \]

4. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto t + \left(0.125 \cdot x - \frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}\right) \]

Alternative 6: 100.0% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ t + \left(0.125 \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ t (- (* 0.125 x) (/ (* y z) 2.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return t + ((0.125 * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = t + ((0.125d0 * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return t + ((0.125 * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return t + ((0.125 * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(t + Float64(Float64(0.125 * x) - Float64(Float64(y * z) / 2.0)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = t + ((0.125 * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(t + N[(N[(0.125 * x), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]

2. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto t + \left(0.125 \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) \]

Alternative 7: 48.2% accurate, 1.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -3.55 \cdot 10^{-124} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 6.5 \cdot 10^{+92}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -3.55e-124) (not (<= z 6.5e+92))) (* z (* y -0.5)) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -3.55e-124) || !(z <= 6.5e+92)) {
		tmp = z * (y * -0.5);
	} else {
		tmp = t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-3.55d-124)) .or. (.not. (z <= 6.5d+92))) then
        tmp = z * (y * (-0.5d0))
    else
        tmp = t
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -3.55e-124) || !(z <= 6.5e+92)) {
		tmp = z * (y * -0.5);
	} else {
		tmp = t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -3.55e-124) or not (z <= 6.5e+92):
		tmp = z * (y * -0.5)
	else:
		tmp = t
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -3.55e-124) || !(z <= 6.5e+92))
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(y * -0.5));
	else
		tmp = t;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -3.55e-124) || ~((z <= 6.5e+92)))
		tmp = z * (y * -0.5);
	else
		tmp = t;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -3.55e-124], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 6.5e+92]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z * N[(y * -0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -3.55000000000000019e-124 or 6.49999999999999999e92 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x + \left(-\frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right)\right)} + t \]

      2. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right)} + t \]

      3. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{0.125} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]

      4. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(0.125 \cdot x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}}\right) + t \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(0.125 \cdot x - \frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}\right) + t} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 57.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 57.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot -0.5} \]

      2. *-commutative 57.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y\right)} \cdot -0.5 \]

      3. associate-*l* 57.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.5\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 57.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.5\right)} \]

   if -3.55000000000000019e-124 < z < 6.49999999999999999e92

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x + \left(-\frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right)\right)} + t \]

      2. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right)} + t \]

      3. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{0.125} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]

      4. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(0.125 \cdot x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}}\right) + t \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(0.125 \cdot x - \frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}\right) + t} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in t around inf 41.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 50.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -3.55 \cdot 10^{-124} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 6.5 \cdot 10^{+92}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(y \cdot -0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 8: 47.0% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -4.1 \cdot 10^{-135}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 3.2 \cdot 10^{+100}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.125 \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= t -4.1e-135) t (if (<= t 3.2e+100) (* 0.125 x) t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (t <= -4.1e-135) {
		tmp = t;
	} else if (t <= 3.2e+100) {
		tmp = 0.125 * x;
	} else {
		tmp = t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (t <= (-4.1d-135)) then
        tmp = t
    else if (t <= 3.2d+100) then
        tmp = 0.125d0 * x
    else
        tmp = t
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (t <= -4.1e-135) {
		tmp = t;
	} else if (t <= 3.2e+100) {
		tmp = 0.125 * x;
	} else {
		tmp = t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if t <= -4.1e-135:
		tmp = t
	elif t <= 3.2e+100:
		tmp = 0.125 * x
	else:
		tmp = t
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t <= -4.1e-135)
		tmp = t;
	elseif (t <= 3.2e+100)
		tmp = Float64(0.125 * x);
	else
		tmp = t;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t <= -4.1e-135)
		tmp = t;
	elseif (t <= 3.2e+100)
		tmp = 0.125 * x;
	else
		tmp = t;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[t, -4.1e-135], t, If[LessEqual[t, 3.2e+100], N[(0.125 * x), $MachinePrecision], t]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if t < -4.1000000000000001e-135 or 3.1999999999999999e100 < t

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x + \left(-\frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right)\right)} + t \]

      2. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right)} + t \]

      3. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{0.125} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]

      4. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(0.125 \cdot x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}}\right) + t \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(0.125 \cdot x - \frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}\right) + t} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in t around inf 55.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t} \]

   if -4.1000000000000001e-135 < t < 3.1999999999999999e100

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x + \left(-\frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right)\right)} + t \]

      2. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right)} + t \]

      3. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{0.125} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]

      4. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(0.125 \cdot x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}}\right) + t \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(0.125 \cdot x - \frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}\right) + t} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 42.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.125 \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 49.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -4.1 \cdot 10^{-135}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 3.2 \cdot 10^{+100}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.125 \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 9: 32.9% accurate, 13.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 t)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return t
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := t

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x + \left(-\frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right)\right)} + t \]

   2. sub-neg 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right)} + t \]

   3. metadata-eval 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{0.125} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]

   4. associate-/l* 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(0.125 \cdot x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}}\right) + t \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(0.125 \cdot x - \frac{y}{\frac{2}{z}}\right) + t} \]

4. Taylor expanded in t around inf 32.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t} \]

5. Final simplification 32.9%

   \[\leadsto t \]

Developer target: 100.0% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\frac{x}{8} + t\right) - \frac{z}{2} \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- (+ (/ x 8.0) t) (* (/ z 2.0) y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return ((x / 8.0) + t) - ((z / 2.0) * y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = ((x / 8.0d0) + t) - ((z / 2.0d0) * y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return ((x / 8.0) + t) - ((z / 2.0) * y);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return ((x / 8.0) + t) - ((z / 2.0) * y)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x / 8.0) + t) - Float64(Float64(z / 2.0) * y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = ((x / 8.0) + t) - ((z / 2.0) * y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(x / 8.0), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(z / 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023310 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "Diagrams.Solve.Polynomial:quartForm  from diagrams-solve-0.1, B"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (- (+ (/ x 8.0) t) (* (/ z 2.0) y))

  (+ (- (* (/ 1.0 8.0) x) (/ (* y z) 2.0)) t))