Equirectangular approximation to distance on a great circle

Percentage Accurate: 59.7% → 99.9%

Time: 24.3s

Alternatives: 14

Speedup: 1.6×

• 31.0% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\\ R \cdot \sqrt{t_0 \cdot t_0 + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi1 phi2) 2.0)))))
   (* R (sqrt (+ (* t_0 t_0) (* (- phi1 phi2) (- phi1 phi2)))))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	return R * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: t_0
    t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0d0))
    code = r * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	return R * Math.sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))
	return R * math.sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))))

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(Float64(phi1 + phi2) / 2.0)))
	return Float64(R * sqrt(Float64(Float64(t_0 * t_0) + Float64(Float64(phi1 - phi2) * Float64(phi1 - phi2)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	tmp = R * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(N[(phi1 + phi2), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(t$95$0 * t$95$0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] * N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Initial Program: 59.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\\ R \cdot \sqrt{t_0 \cdot t_0 + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi1 phi2) 2.0)))))
   (* R (sqrt (+ (* t_0 t_0) (* (- phi1 phi2) (- phi1 phi2)))))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	return R * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: t_0
    t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0d0))
    code = r * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	return R * Math.sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))
	return R * math.sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))))

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(Float64(phi1 + phi2) / 2.0)))
	return Float64(R * sqrt(Float64(Float64(t_0 * t_0) + Float64(Float64(phi1 - phi2) * Float64(phi1 - phi2)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	tmp = R * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(N[(phi1 + phi2), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(t$95$0 * t$95$0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] * N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Alternative 1: 99.9% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right), \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \left(-\sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  R
  (hypot
   (*
    (- lambda1 lambda2)
    (fma
     (cos (* phi2 0.5))
     (cos (* 0.5 phi1))
     (* (sin (* phi2 0.5)) (- (sin (* 0.5 phi1))))))
   (- phi1 phi2))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * fma(cos((phi2 * 0.5)), cos((0.5 * phi1)), (sin((phi2 * 0.5)) * -sin((0.5 * phi1))))), (phi1 - phi2));
}

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(R * hypot(Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * fma(cos(Float64(phi2 * 0.5)), cos(Float64(0.5 * phi1)), Float64(sin(Float64(phi2 * 0.5)) * Float64(-sin(Float64(0.5 * phi1)))))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)))
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Cos[N[(phi2 * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi1), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[Sin[N[(phi2 * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * (-N[Sin[N[(0.5 * phi1), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision])), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 56.9%

   \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. hypot-def 93.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

3. Simplified 93.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. expm1-log1p-u 93.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   2. div-inv 93.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\cos \color{blue}{\left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot \frac{1}{2}\right)}\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   3. metadata-eval 93.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{0.5}\right)\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

5. Applied egg-rr 93.5%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot 0.5\right)\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 93.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\cos \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)}\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   2. +-commutative 93.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)}\right)\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   3. distribute-rgt-in 93.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\cos \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5 + \phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)}\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   4. cos-sum 99.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)}\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

7. Applied egg-rr 99.9%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)}\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
8. Step-by-step derivation

   1. expm1-log1p-u 99.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   2. cancel-sign-sub-inv 99.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) + \left(-\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   3. fma-def 99.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right), \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right), \left(-\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   4. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right), \cos \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}, \left(-\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   5. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right), \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), \left(-\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \cdot \sin \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

9. Applied egg-rr 99.9%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right), \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), \left(-\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

10. Final simplification 99.9%

    \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right), \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \left(-\sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

Alternative 2: 88.5% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\\ t_1 := \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;\lambda_1 \leq -3 \cdot 10^{+201}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_1 \cdot \left(t_1 - t_0\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\lambda_1 \leq -2 \cdot 10^{-76}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_2 + \phi_1}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_2 \cdot \left(t_0 - t_1\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (sin (* phi2 0.5)) (sin (* 0.5 phi1))))
        (t_1 (* (cos (* 0.5 phi1)) (cos (* phi2 0.5)))))
   (if (<= lambda1 -3e+201)
     (* R (hypot (* lambda1 (- t_1 t_0)) (- phi1 phi2)))
     (if (<= lambda1 -2e-76)
       (*
        R
        (hypot
         (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi2 phi1) 2.0)))
         (- phi1 phi2)))
       (* R (hypot (* lambda2 (- t_0 t_1)) (- phi1 phi2)))))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double t_0 = sin((phi2 * 0.5)) * sin((0.5 * phi1));
	double t_1 = cos((0.5 * phi1)) * cos((phi2 * 0.5));
	double tmp;
	if (lambda1 <= -3e+201) {
		tmp = R * hypot((lambda1 * (t_1 - t_0)), (phi1 - phi2));
	} else if (lambda1 <= -2e-76) {
		tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi2 + phi1) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
	} else {
		tmp = R * hypot((lambda2 * (t_0 - t_1)), (phi1 - phi2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double t_0 = Math.sin((phi2 * 0.5)) * Math.sin((0.5 * phi1));
	double t_1 = Math.cos((0.5 * phi1)) * Math.cos((phi2 * 0.5));
	double tmp;
	if (lambda1 <= -3e+201) {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot((lambda1 * (t_1 - t_0)), (phi1 - phi2));
	} else if (lambda1 <= -2e-76) {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos(((phi2 + phi1) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
	} else {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot((lambda2 * (t_0 - t_1)), (phi1 - phi2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	t_0 = math.sin((phi2 * 0.5)) * math.sin((0.5 * phi1))
	t_1 = math.cos((0.5 * phi1)) * math.cos((phi2 * 0.5))
	tmp = 0
	if lambda1 <= -3e+201:
		tmp = R * math.hypot((lambda1 * (t_1 - t_0)), (phi1 - phi2))
	elif lambda1 <= -2e-76:
		tmp = R * math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos(((phi2 + phi1) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2))
	else:
		tmp = R * math.hypot((lambda2 * (t_0 - t_1)), (phi1 - phi2))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	t_0 = Float64(sin(Float64(phi2 * 0.5)) * sin(Float64(0.5 * phi1)))
	t_1 = Float64(cos(Float64(0.5 * phi1)) * cos(Float64(phi2 * 0.5)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (lambda1 <= -3e+201)
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(Float64(lambda1 * Float64(t_1 - t_0)), Float64(phi1 - phi2)));
	elseif (lambda1 <= -2e-76)
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(Float64(phi2 + phi1) / 2.0))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(Float64(lambda2 * Float64(t_0 - t_1)), Float64(phi1 - phi2)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	t_0 = sin((phi2 * 0.5)) * sin((0.5 * phi1));
	t_1 = cos((0.5 * phi1)) * cos((phi2 * 0.5));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (lambda1 <= -3e+201)
		tmp = R * hypot((lambda1 * (t_1 - t_0)), (phi1 - phi2));
	elseif (lambda1 <= -2e-76)
		tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi2 + phi1) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
	else
		tmp = R * hypot((lambda2 * (t_0 - t_1)), (phi1 - phi2));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[Sin[N[(phi2 * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sin[N[(0.5 * phi1), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi1), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(phi2 * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[lambda1, -3e+201], N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(lambda1 * N[(t$95$1 - t$95$0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[lambda1, -2e-76], N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(N[(phi2 + phi1), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(lambda2 * N[(t$95$0 - t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if lambda1 < -3.00000000000000025e201

   1. Initial program 48.8%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 87.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 87.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. expm1-log1p-u 87.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      2. div-inv 87.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\cos \color{blue}{\left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot \frac{1}{2}\right)}\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      3. metadata-eval 87.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{0.5}\right)\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   5. Applied egg-rr 87.4%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot 0.5\right)\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 87.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\cos \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)}\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      2. +-commutative 87.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)}\right)\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      3. distribute-rgt-in 87.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\cos \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5 + \phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)}\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      4. cos-sum 99.9%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)}\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   7. Applied egg-rr 99.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)}\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   8. Taylor expanded in lambda1 around inf 89.4%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\lambda_1 \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 89.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_1}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   10. Simplified 89.4%

       \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_1}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   if -3.00000000000000025e201 < lambda1 < -1.99999999999999985e-76

   1. Initial program 54.9%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 94.3%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 94.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   if -1.99999999999999985e-76 < lambda1

   1. Initial program 58.9%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 94.2%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 94.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. expm1-log1p-u 94.2%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      2. div-inv 94.2%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\cos \color{blue}{\left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot \frac{1}{2}\right)}\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      3. metadata-eval 94.2%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{0.5}\right)\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   5. Applied egg-rr 94.2%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot 0.5\right)\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 94.2%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\cos \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)}\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      2. +-commutative 94.2%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)}\right)\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      3. distribute-rgt-in 94.2%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\cos \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5 + \phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)}\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      4. cos-sum 99.9%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)}\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   7. Applied egg-rr 99.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)}\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   8. Taylor expanded in lambda1 around 0 87.8%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(\lambda_2 \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 87.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      2. neg-mul-1 87.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-\lambda_2\right)} \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   10. Simplified 87.8%

       \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-\lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 89.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\lambda_1 \leq -3 \cdot 10^{+201}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_1 \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\lambda_1 \leq -2 \cdot 10^{-76}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_2 + \phi_1}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_2 \cdot \left(\sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) - \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 95.7% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\lambda_1 \leq -3.5 \cdot 10^{+201}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_1 \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_2 + \phi_1}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= lambda1 -3.5e+201)
   (*
    R
    (hypot
     (*
      lambda1
      (-
       (* (cos (* 0.5 phi1)) (cos (* phi2 0.5)))
       (* (sin (* phi2 0.5)) (sin (* 0.5 phi1)))))
     (- phi1 phi2)))
   (*
    R
    (hypot
     (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi2 phi1) 2.0)))
     (- phi1 phi2)))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (lambda1 <= -3.5e+201) {
		tmp = R * hypot((lambda1 * ((cos((0.5 * phi1)) * cos((phi2 * 0.5))) - (sin((phi2 * 0.5)) * sin((0.5 * phi1))))), (phi1 - phi2));
	} else {
		tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi2 + phi1) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (lambda1 <= -3.5e+201) {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot((lambda1 * ((Math.cos((0.5 * phi1)) * Math.cos((phi2 * 0.5))) - (Math.sin((phi2 * 0.5)) * Math.sin((0.5 * phi1))))), (phi1 - phi2));
	} else {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos(((phi2 + phi1) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if lambda1 <= -3.5e+201:
		tmp = R * math.hypot((lambda1 * ((math.cos((0.5 * phi1)) * math.cos((phi2 * 0.5))) - (math.sin((phi2 * 0.5)) * math.sin((0.5 * phi1))))), (phi1 - phi2))
	else:
		tmp = R * math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos(((phi2 + phi1) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (lambda1 <= -3.5e+201)
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(Float64(lambda1 * Float64(Float64(cos(Float64(0.5 * phi1)) * cos(Float64(phi2 * 0.5))) - Float64(sin(Float64(phi2 * 0.5)) * sin(Float64(0.5 * phi1))))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(Float64(phi2 + phi1) / 2.0))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (lambda1 <= -3.5e+201)
		tmp = R * hypot((lambda1 * ((cos((0.5 * phi1)) * cos((phi2 * 0.5))) - (sin((phi2 * 0.5)) * sin((0.5 * phi1))))), (phi1 - phi2));
	else
		tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi2 + phi1) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[lambda1, -3.5e+201], N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(lambda1 * N[(N[(N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi1), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(phi2 * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[Sin[N[(phi2 * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sin[N[(0.5 * phi1), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(N[(phi2 + phi1), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if lambda1 < -3.5000000000000002e201

   1. Initial program 48.8%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 87.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 87.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. expm1-log1p-u 87.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      2. div-inv 87.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\cos \color{blue}{\left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot \frac{1}{2}\right)}\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      3. metadata-eval 87.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{0.5}\right)\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   5. Applied egg-rr 87.4%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot 0.5\right)\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 87.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\cos \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)}\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      2. +-commutative 87.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)}\right)\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      3. distribute-rgt-in 87.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\cos \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5 + \phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)}\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

      4. cos-sum 99.9%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)}\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   7. Applied egg-rr 99.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(\phi_1 \cdot 0.5\right)}\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   8. Taylor expanded in lambda1 around inf 89.4%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\lambda_1 \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 89.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_1}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   10. Simplified 89.4%

       \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) - \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_1}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   if -3.5000000000000002e201 < lambda1

   1. Initial program 57.8%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 94.2%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 94.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 93.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\lambda_1 \leq -3.5 \cdot 10^{+201}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\lambda_1 \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) - \sin \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_2 + \phi_1}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 92.9% accurate, 1.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_1 \leq -6.6 \cdot 10^{-6}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi1 -6.6e-6)
   (* R (hypot (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (* 0.5 phi1))) (- phi1 phi2)))
   (* R (hypot (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (* phi2 0.5))) (- phi1 phi2)))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi1 <= -6.6e-6) {
		tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((0.5 * phi1))), (phi1 - phi2));
	} else {
		tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((phi2 * 0.5))), (phi1 - phi2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi1 <= -6.6e-6) {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos((0.5 * phi1))), (phi1 - phi2));
	} else {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos((phi2 * 0.5))), (phi1 - phi2));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi1 <= -6.6e-6:
		tmp = R * math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos((0.5 * phi1))), (phi1 - phi2))
	else:
		tmp = R * math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos((phi2 * 0.5))), (phi1 - phi2))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi1 <= -6.6e-6)
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(0.5 * phi1))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(phi2 * 0.5))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi1 <= -6.6e-6)
		tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((0.5 * phi1))), (phi1 - phi2));
	else
		tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((phi2 * 0.5))), (phi1 - phi2));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi1, -6.6e-6], N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi1), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(phi2 * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if phi1 < -6.60000000000000034e-6

   1. Initial program 54.5%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 86.3%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 86.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 86.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   if -6.60000000000000034e-6 < phi1

   1. Initial program 57.9%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 96.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 93.1%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 91.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_1 \leq -6.6 \cdot 10^{-6}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 95.6% accurate, 1.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_2 + \phi_1}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  R
  (hypot (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi2 phi1) 2.0))) (- phi1 phi2))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi2 + phi1) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * Math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos(((phi2 + phi1) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	return R * math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos(((phi2 + phi1) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2))

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(R * hypot(Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(Float64(phi2 + phi1) / 2.0))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi2 + phi1) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(N[(phi2 + phi1), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 56.9%

   \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. hypot-def 93.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

3. Simplified 93.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 93.5%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_2 + \phi_1}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

Alternative 6: 90.1% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (* R (hypot (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (* 0.5 phi1))) (- phi1 phi2))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((0.5 * phi1))), (phi1 - phi2));
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * Math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos((0.5 * phi1))), (phi1 - phi2));
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	return R * math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos((0.5 * phi1))), (phi1 - phi2))

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(R * hypot(Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(0.5 * phi1))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((0.5 * phi1))), (phi1 - phi2));
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi1), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 56.9%

   \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. hypot-def 93.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

3. Simplified 93.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 88.6%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

5. Final simplification 88.6%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

Alternative 7: 34.7% accurate, 2.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq -5.5 \cdot 10^{-259}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(-\phi_1\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\phi_2 \leq 4.5 \cdot 10^{-30}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_2 - \lambda_1\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi2 -5.5e-259)
   (* R (- phi1))
   (if (<= phi2 4.5e-30)
     (* R (* (cos (* 0.5 phi1)) (- lambda2 lambda1)))
     (* R (- phi2 phi1)))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= -5.5e-259) {
		tmp = R * -phi1;
	} else if (phi2 <= 4.5e-30) {
		tmp = R * (cos((0.5 * phi1)) * (lambda2 - lambda1));
	} else {
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (phi2 <= (-5.5d-259)) then
        tmp = r * -phi1
    else if (phi2 <= 4.5d-30) then
        tmp = r * (cos((0.5d0 * phi1)) * (lambda2 - lambda1))
    else
        tmp = r * (phi2 - phi1)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= -5.5e-259) {
		tmp = R * -phi1;
	} else if (phi2 <= 4.5e-30) {
		tmp = R * (Math.cos((0.5 * phi1)) * (lambda2 - lambda1));
	} else {
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi2 <= -5.5e-259:
		tmp = R * -phi1
	elif phi2 <= 4.5e-30:
		tmp = R * (math.cos((0.5 * phi1)) * (lambda2 - lambda1))
	else:
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi2 <= -5.5e-259)
		tmp = Float64(R * Float64(-phi1));
	elseif (phi2 <= 4.5e-30)
		tmp = Float64(R * Float64(cos(Float64(0.5 * phi1)) * Float64(lambda2 - lambda1)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * Float64(phi2 - phi1));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi2 <= -5.5e-259)
		tmp = R * -phi1;
	elseif (phi2 <= 4.5e-30)
		tmp = R * (cos((0.5 * phi1)) * (lambda2 - lambda1));
	else
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi2, -5.5e-259], N[(R * (-phi1)), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[phi2, 4.5e-30], N[(R * N[(N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi1), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[(lambda2 - lambda1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * N[(phi2 - phi1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if phi2 < -5.50000000000000038e-259

   1. Initial program 52.6%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 92.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 92.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi1 around -inf 24.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 24.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-R \cdot \phi_1} \]

      2. *-commutative 24.3%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot R} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 24.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot \left(-R\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 24.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot \left(-R\right)} \]

   if -5.50000000000000038e-259 < phi2 < 4.49999999999999967e-30

   1. Initial program 61.7%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 99.9%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in lambda1 around -inf 42.0%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(\lambda_1 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)\right) + \lambda_2 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 42.0%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\lambda_2 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right) + -1 \cdot \left(\lambda_1 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]

      2. associate-*r* 42.0%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\lambda_2 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \lambda_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)}\right) \]

      3. distribute-rgt-out 42.0%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_2 + -1 \cdot \lambda_1\right)\right)} \]

      4. +-commutative 42.0%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)}\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_2 + -1 \cdot \lambda_1\right)\right) \]

      5. mul-1-neg 42.0%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_2 + \color{blue}{\left(-\lambda_1\right)}\right)\right) \]

   6. Simplified 42.0%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_2 + \left(-\lambda_1\right)\right)\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 42.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_2 - \lambda_1\right)\right)} \]

   if 4.49999999999999967e-30 < phi2

   1. Initial program 59.3%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 89.2%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 89.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi1 around -inf 61.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 + -1 \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 61.9%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \color{blue}{\left(-\phi_1\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 61.9%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 61.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 39.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq -5.5 \cdot 10^{-259}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(-\phi_1\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\phi_2 \leq 4.5 \cdot 10^{-30}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_2 - \lambda_1\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 8: 33.5% accurate, 2.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq -2.7 \cdot 10^{-232}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(-\phi_1\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\phi_2 \leq 3.4 \cdot 10^{-30}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_2 - \lambda_1\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi2 -2.7e-232)
   (* R (- phi1))
   (if (<= phi2 3.4e-30)
     (* R (* (cos (* phi2 0.5)) (- lambda2 lambda1)))
     (* R (- phi2 phi1)))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= -2.7e-232) {
		tmp = R * -phi1;
	} else if (phi2 <= 3.4e-30) {
		tmp = R * (cos((phi2 * 0.5)) * (lambda2 - lambda1));
	} else {
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (phi2 <= (-2.7d-232)) then
        tmp = r * -phi1
    else if (phi2 <= 3.4d-30) then
        tmp = r * (cos((phi2 * 0.5d0)) * (lambda2 - lambda1))
    else
        tmp = r * (phi2 - phi1)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= -2.7e-232) {
		tmp = R * -phi1;
	} else if (phi2 <= 3.4e-30) {
		tmp = R * (Math.cos((phi2 * 0.5)) * (lambda2 - lambda1));
	} else {
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi2 <= -2.7e-232:
		tmp = R * -phi1
	elif phi2 <= 3.4e-30:
		tmp = R * (math.cos((phi2 * 0.5)) * (lambda2 - lambda1))
	else:
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi2 <= -2.7e-232)
		tmp = Float64(R * Float64(-phi1));
	elseif (phi2 <= 3.4e-30)
		tmp = Float64(R * Float64(cos(Float64(phi2 * 0.5)) * Float64(lambda2 - lambda1)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * Float64(phi2 - phi1));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi2 <= -2.7e-232)
		tmp = R * -phi1;
	elseif (phi2 <= 3.4e-30)
		tmp = R * (cos((phi2 * 0.5)) * (lambda2 - lambda1));
	else
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi2, -2.7e-232], N[(R * (-phi1)), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[phi2, 3.4e-30], N[(R * N[(N[Cos[N[(phi2 * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[(lambda2 - lambda1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * N[(phi2 - phi1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if phi2 < -2.6999999999999999e-232

   1. Initial program 52.1%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 91.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 91.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi1 around -inf 23.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 23.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-R \cdot \phi_1} \]

      2. *-commutative 23.0%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot R} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 23.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot \left(-R\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 23.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot \left(-R\right)} \]

   if -2.6999999999999999e-232 < phi2 < 3.4000000000000003e-30

   1. Initial program 61.6%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 99.9%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in lambda1 around -inf 41.0%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(\lambda_1 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)\right) + \lambda_2 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 41.0%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\lambda_2 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right) + -1 \cdot \left(\lambda_1 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]

      2. associate-*r* 41.0%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\lambda_2 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \lambda_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)}\right) \]

      3. distribute-rgt-out 41.0%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_2 + -1 \cdot \lambda_1\right)\right)} \]

      4. +-commutative 41.0%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)}\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_2 + -1 \cdot \lambda_1\right)\right) \]

      5. mul-1-neg 41.0%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_2 + \color{blue}{\left(-\lambda_1\right)}\right)\right) \]

   6. Simplified 41.0%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_2 + \left(-\lambda_1\right)\right)\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 39.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_2 - \lambda_1\right)\right)} \]

   if 3.4000000000000003e-30 < phi2

   1. Initial program 59.3%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 89.2%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 89.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi1 around -inf 61.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 + -1 \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 61.9%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \color{blue}{\left(-\phi_1\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 61.9%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 61.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 38.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq -2.7 \cdot 10^{-232}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(-\phi_1\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\phi_2 \leq 3.4 \cdot 10^{-30}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_2 - \lambda_1\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 9: 34.8% accurate, 3.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\lambda_2 \leq 1.6 \cdot 10^{+168}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(\lambda_2 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= lambda2 1.6e+168)
   (* R (- phi2 phi1))
   (* R (* lambda2 (cos (* 0.5 phi1))))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (lambda2 <= 1.6e+168) {
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	} else {
		tmp = R * (lambda2 * cos((0.5 * phi1)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (lambda2 <= 1.6d+168) then
        tmp = r * (phi2 - phi1)
    else
        tmp = r * (lambda2 * cos((0.5d0 * phi1)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (lambda2 <= 1.6e+168) {
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	} else {
		tmp = R * (lambda2 * Math.cos((0.5 * phi1)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if lambda2 <= 1.6e+168:
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1)
	else:
		tmp = R * (lambda2 * math.cos((0.5 * phi1)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (lambda2 <= 1.6e+168)
		tmp = Float64(R * Float64(phi2 - phi1));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * Float64(lambda2 * cos(Float64(0.5 * phi1))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (lambda2 <= 1.6e+168)
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	else
		tmp = R * (lambda2 * cos((0.5 * phi1)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[lambda2, 1.6e+168], N[(R * N[(phi2 - phi1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * N[(lambda2 * N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi1), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if lambda2 < 1.6000000000000001e168

   1. Initial program 62.1%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 94.0%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 94.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi1 around -inf 36.7%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 + -1 \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 36.7%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \color{blue}{\left(-\phi_1\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 36.7%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 36.7%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)} \]

   if 1.6000000000000001e168 < lambda2

   1. Initial program 24.2%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 90.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 90.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in lambda2 around inf 45.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \left(\lambda_2 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 45.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\lambda_2 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)\right) \cdot R} \]

      2. *-commutative 45.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_2\right)} \cdot R \]

      3. associate-*l* 45.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_2 \cdot R\right)} \]

      4. +-commutative 45.4%

         \[\leadsto \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)}\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_2 \cdot R\right) \]

   6. Simplified 45.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_2 \cdot R\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 46.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \left(\lambda_2 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 46.2%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \lambda_2\right)} \]

   9. Simplified 46.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \lambda_2\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 38.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\lambda_2 \leq 1.6 \cdot 10^{+168}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(\lambda_2 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 10: 34.7% accurate, 3.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\lambda_2 \leq 2.6 \cdot 10^{+171}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(\lambda_2 \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= lambda2 2.6e+171)
   (* R (- phi2 phi1))
   (* R (* lambda2 (cos (* phi2 0.5))))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (lambda2 <= 2.6e+171) {
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	} else {
		tmp = R * (lambda2 * cos((phi2 * 0.5)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (lambda2 <= 2.6d+171) then
        tmp = r * (phi2 - phi1)
    else
        tmp = r * (lambda2 * cos((phi2 * 0.5d0)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (lambda2 <= 2.6e+171) {
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	} else {
		tmp = R * (lambda2 * Math.cos((phi2 * 0.5)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if lambda2 <= 2.6e+171:
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1)
	else:
		tmp = R * (lambda2 * math.cos((phi2 * 0.5)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (lambda2 <= 2.6e+171)
		tmp = Float64(R * Float64(phi2 - phi1));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * Float64(lambda2 * cos(Float64(phi2 * 0.5))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (lambda2 <= 2.6e+171)
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	else
		tmp = R * (lambda2 * cos((phi2 * 0.5)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[lambda2, 2.6e+171], N[(R * N[(phi2 - phi1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * N[(lambda2 * N[Cos[N[(phi2 * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if lambda2 < 2.6e171

   1. Initial program 62.1%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 94.0%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 94.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi1 around -inf 36.7%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 + -1 \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 36.7%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \color{blue}{\left(-\phi_1\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 36.7%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 36.7%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)} \]

   if 2.6e171 < lambda2

   1. Initial program 24.2%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 90.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 90.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in lambda2 around inf 45.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \left(\lambda_2 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 45.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\lambda_2 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)\right) \cdot R} \]

      2. *-commutative 45.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_2\right)} \cdot R \]

      3. associate-*l* 45.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_2 \cdot R\right)} \]

      4. +-commutative 45.4%

         \[\leadsto \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)}\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_2 \cdot R\right) \]

   6. Simplified 45.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_2 \cdot R\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 48.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \left(\lambda_2 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right)} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 48.7%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \lambda_2\right)} \]

   9. Simplified 48.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \lambda_2\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 38.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\lambda_2 \leq 2.6 \cdot 10^{+171}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(\lambda_2 \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 11: 34.7% accurate, 3.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\lambda_2 \leq 9 \cdot 10^{+169}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\lambda_2 \cdot \left(R \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= lambda2 9e+169)
   (* R (- phi2 phi1))
   (* lambda2 (* R (cos (* phi2 0.5))))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (lambda2 <= 9e+169) {
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	} else {
		tmp = lambda2 * (R * cos((phi2 * 0.5)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (lambda2 <= 9d+169) then
        tmp = r * (phi2 - phi1)
    else
        tmp = lambda2 * (r * cos((phi2 * 0.5d0)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (lambda2 <= 9e+169) {
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	} else {
		tmp = lambda2 * (R * Math.cos((phi2 * 0.5)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if lambda2 <= 9e+169:
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1)
	else:
		tmp = lambda2 * (R * math.cos((phi2 * 0.5)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (lambda2 <= 9e+169)
		tmp = Float64(R * Float64(phi2 - phi1));
	else
		tmp = Float64(lambda2 * Float64(R * cos(Float64(phi2 * 0.5))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (lambda2 <= 9e+169)
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	else
		tmp = lambda2 * (R * cos((phi2 * 0.5)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[lambda2, 9e+169], N[(R * N[(phi2 - phi1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(lambda2 * N[(R * N[Cos[N[(phi2 * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if lambda2 < 8.9999999999999999e169

   1. Initial program 62.1%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 94.0%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 94.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi1 around -inf 36.7%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 + -1 \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 36.7%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \color{blue}{\left(-\phi_1\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 36.7%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 36.7%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)} \]

   if 8.9999999999999999e169 < lambda2

   1. Initial program 24.2%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 90.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 90.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in lambda2 around inf 45.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \left(\lambda_2 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 45.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\lambda_2 \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)\right) \cdot R} \]

      2. *-commutative 45.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_2\right)} \cdot R \]

      3. associate-*l* 45.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_2 \cdot R\right)} \]

      4. +-commutative 45.4%

         \[\leadsto \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)}\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_2 \cdot R\right) \]

   6. Simplified 45.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_2 \cdot R\right)} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. expm1-log1p-u 22.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_2 \cdot R\right)\right)\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 22.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\lambda_2 \cdot R\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)\right)}\right)\right) \]

      3. associate-*l* 22.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\lambda_2 \cdot \left(R \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)\right)\right)}\right)\right) \]

      4. *-commutative 22.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\lambda_2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot R\right)}\right)\right) \]

      5. +-commutative 22.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\lambda_2 \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)}\right) \cdot R\right)\right)\right) \]

      6. *-commutative 22.4%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\lambda_2 \cdot \left(\cos \color{blue}{\left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot 0.5\right)} \cdot R\right)\right)\right) \]

   8. Applied egg-rr 22.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\lambda_2 \cdot \left(\cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot R\right)\right)\right)} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. expm1-log1p-u 45.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\lambda_2 \cdot \left(\cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot R\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 45.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot R\right) \cdot \lambda_2} \]

      3. *-commutative 45.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(R \cdot \cos \left(\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right) \cdot 0.5\right)\right)} \cdot \lambda_2 \]

      4. *-commutative 45.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(R \cdot \cos \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)\right)}\right) \cdot \lambda_2 \]

      5. +-commutative 45.5%

         \[\leadsto \left(R \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)}\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_2 \]

   10. Applied egg-rr 45.5%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(R \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)\right)\right) \cdot \lambda_2} \]

   11. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 48.8%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(R \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right)} \cdot \lambda_2 \]
   12. Step-by-step derivation

       1. *-commutative 48.8%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot R\right)} \cdot \lambda_2 \]

       2. *-commutative 48.8%

          \[\leadsto \left(\cos \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)} \cdot R\right) \cdot \lambda_2 \]

   13. Simplified 48.8%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot R\right)} \cdot \lambda_2 \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 38.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\lambda_2 \leq 9 \cdot 10^{+169}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\lambda_2 \cdot \left(R \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 \cdot 0.5\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 12: 30.0% accurate, 54.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_1 \leq -250000000000:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(-\phi_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \phi_2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi1 -250000000000.0) (* R (- phi1)) (* R phi2)))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi1 <= -250000000000.0) {
		tmp = R * -phi1;
	} else {
		tmp = R * phi2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (phi1 <= (-250000000000.0d0)) then
        tmp = r * -phi1
    else
        tmp = r * phi2
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi1 <= -250000000000.0) {
		tmp = R * -phi1;
	} else {
		tmp = R * phi2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi1 <= -250000000000.0:
		tmp = R * -phi1
	else:
		tmp = R * phi2
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi1 <= -250000000000.0)
		tmp = Float64(R * Float64(-phi1));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * phi2);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi1 <= -250000000000.0)
		tmp = R * -phi1;
	else
		tmp = R * phi2;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi1, -250000000000.0], N[(R * (-phi1)), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * phi2), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if phi1 < -2.5e11

   1. Initial program 52.6%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 85.7%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 85.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi1 around -inf 64.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(R \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 64.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-R \cdot \phi_1} \]

      2. *-commutative 64.7%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot R} \]

      3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 64.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot \left(-R\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 64.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot \left(-R\right)} \]

   if -2.5e11 < phi1

   1. Initial program 58.6%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 96.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf 23.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \phi_2} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 23.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R} \]

   6. Simplified 23.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 34.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_1 \leq -250000000000:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(-\phi_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \phi_2\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 13: 30.9% accurate, 65.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ R \cdot \left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2) :precision binary64 (* R (- phi2 phi1)))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * (phi2 - phi1);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    code = r * (phi2 - phi1)
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * (phi2 - phi1);
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	return R * (phi2 - phi1)

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(R * Float64(phi2 - phi1))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(R * N[(phi2 - phi1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 56.9%

   \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. hypot-def 93.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

3. Simplified 93.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in phi1 around -inf 33.6%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 + -1 \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. mul-1-neg 33.6%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \color{blue}{\left(-\phi_1\right)}\right) \]

   2. unsub-neg 33.6%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)} \]

6. Simplified 33.6%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)} \]

7. Final simplification 33.6%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right) \]

Alternative 14: 18.2% accurate, 109.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ R \cdot \phi_2 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2) :precision binary64 (* R phi2))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * phi2;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    code = r * phi2
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * phi2;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	return R * phi2

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(R * phi2)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = R * phi2;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(R * phi2), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 56.9%

   \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. hypot-def 93.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

3. Simplified 93.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf 19.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \phi_2} \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 19.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R} \]

6. Simplified 19.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R} \]

7. Final simplification 19.3%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \phi_2 \]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023309 
(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
  :name "Equirectangular approximation to distance on a great circle"
  :precision binary64
  (* R (sqrt (+ (* (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi1 phi2) 2.0))) (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi1 phi2) 2.0)))) (* (- phi1 phi2) (- phi1 phi2))))))