SynthBasics:moogVCF from YampaSynth-0.2

Percentage Accurate: 93.7% → 97.2%

Time: 13.3s

Alternatives: 8

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (* (* y z) (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y))));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + ((y * z) * (math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y))))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * z) * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 93.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (* (* y z) (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y))));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + ((y * z) * (math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y))))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * z) * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 97.2% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (fma y (* z (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y)))) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return fma(y, (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))), x);
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return fma(y, Float64(z * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y)))), x)
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(y * N[(z * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 94.1%

   \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 94.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

   2. associate-*l* 98.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

   3. fma-def 98.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

3. Simplified 98.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 98.1%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right) \]

Alternative 2: 97.1% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (* y (* z (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + (y * (z * (Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y)))));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + (y * (z * (math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y)))))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y))))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(z * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 94.1%

   \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-*l* 98.1%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

3. Simplified 98.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 98.1%

   \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right) \]

Alternative 3: 83.1% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{+16}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot t_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(y \cdot t_1 - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (tanh (/ t y))))
   (if (<= y 1.25e+16) (+ x (* y (* z t_1))) (+ x (* z (- (* y t_1) x))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = tanh((t / y));
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.25e+16) {
		tmp = x + (y * (z * t_1));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * ((y * t_1) - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = tanh((t / y))
    if (y <= 1.25d+16) then
        tmp = x + (y * (z * t_1))
    else
        tmp = x + (z * ((y * t_1) - x))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = Math.tanh((t / y));
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.25e+16) {
		tmp = x + (y * (z * t_1));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * ((y * t_1) - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	t_1 = math.tanh((t / y))
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 1.25e+16:
		tmp = x + (y * (z * t_1))
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * ((y * t_1) - x))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = tanh(Float64(t / y))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 1.25e+16)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z * t_1)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(Float64(y * t_1) - x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = tanh((t / y));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 1.25e+16)
		tmp = x + (y * (z * t_1));
	else
		tmp = x + (z * ((y * t_1) - x));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[y, 1.25e+16], N[(x + N[(y * N[(z * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(z * N[(N[(y * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision] - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 1.25e16

   1. Initial program 95.4%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l* 98.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 98.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 24.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/r* 24.2%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right)\right) \]

      2. div-sub 24.2%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right) \]

      3. rec-exp 24.2%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}\right) \]

      4. rec-exp 24.2%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}\right) \]

      5. tanh-def-a 82.1%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)}\right) \]

   6. Simplified 82.1%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)\right)} \]

   if 1.25e16 < y

   1. Initial program 88.8%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l* 97.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 50.1%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 50.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right) + -1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 92.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot y + \left(-x\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 84.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{+16}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(y \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 82.4% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 3 \cdot 10^{+110}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 3e+110) (+ x (* y (* z (tanh (/ t y))))) (+ x (* z (- t x)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 3e+110) {
		tmp = x + (y * (z * tanh((t / y))));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 3d+110) then
        tmp = x + (y * (z * tanh((t / y))))
    else
        tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 3e+110) {
		tmp = x + (y * (z * Math.tanh((t / y))));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 3e+110:
		tmp = x + (y * (z * math.tanh((t / y))))
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 3e+110)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z * tanh(Float64(t / y)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(t - x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 3e+110)
		tmp = x + (y * (z * tanh((t / y))));
	else
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y, 3e+110], N[(x + N[(y * N[(z * N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 3.00000000000000007e110

   1. Initial program 95.7%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l* 98.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 98.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 24.4%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/r* 24.0%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right)\right) \]

      2. div-sub 24.0%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right) \]

      3. rec-exp 24.0%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}\right) \]

      4. rec-exp 24.0%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}\right) \]

      5. tanh-def-a 82.1%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)}\right) \]

   6. Simplified 82.1%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)\right)} \]

   if 3.00000000000000007e110 < y

   1. Initial program 84.3%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l* 97.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 87.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 82.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 3 \cdot 10^{+110}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 68.8% accurate, 23.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 6.5 \cdot 10^{+16}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 6.5e+16) x (+ x (* z (- t x)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 6.5e+16) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 6.5d+16) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 6.5e+16) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 6.5e+16:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 6.5e+16)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(t - x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 6.5e+16)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y, 6.5e+16], x, N[(x + N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 6.5e16

   1. Initial program 95.4%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l* 98.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 98.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 71.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 6.5e16 < y

   1. Initial program 88.8%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l* 97.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 80.1%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 73.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 6.5 \cdot 10^{+16}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6: 63.4% accurate, 30.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 4.6 \cdot 10^{+27}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (if (<= y 4.6e+27) x (* x (- 1.0 z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 4.6e+27) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 4.6d+27) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = x * (1.0d0 - z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 4.6e+27) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 4.6e+27:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 4.6e+27)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(1.0 - z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 4.6e+27)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y, 4.6e+27], x, N[(x * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 4.6000000000000001e27

   1. Initial program 95.4%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l* 98.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 98.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 70.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 4.6000000000000001e27 < y

   1. Initial program 88.3%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l* 97.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 83.1%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 59.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 59.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 59.0%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 59.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 68.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 4.6 \cdot 10^{+27}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 7: 65.3% accurate, 30.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1100000000:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (if (<= y 1100000000.0) x (+ x (* z t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1100000000.0) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 1100000000.0d0) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = x + (z * t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1100000000.0) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 1100000000.0:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 1100000000.0)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 1100000000.0)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = x + (z * t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y, 1100000000.0], x, N[(x + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 1.1e9

   1. Initial program 95.3%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l* 98.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 98.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 71.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 1.1e9 < y

   1. Initial program 89.2%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l* 98.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 98.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 79.1%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in t around inf 65.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 65.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot t} \]

   7. Simplified 65.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot t} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 70.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1100000000:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 8: 60.1% accurate, 213.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 94.1%

   \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-*l* 98.1%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

3. Simplified 98.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 64.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

5. Final simplification 64.7%

   \[\leadsto x \]

Developer target: 97.1% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (* y (* z (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + (y * (z * (Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y)))));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + (y * (z * (math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y)))))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y))))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(z * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023309 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "SynthBasics:moogVCF from YampaSynth-0.2"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (+ x (* y (* z (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))

  (+ x (* (* y z) (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))