Sample trimmed logistic on [-pi, pi]

Percentage Accurate: 98.9% → 98.9%
Time: 12.1s
Alternatives: 7
Speedup: 1.4×

Specification

?
\[\left(2.328306437 \cdot 10^{-10} \leq u \land u \leq 1\right) \land \left(0 \leq s \land s \leq 1.0651631\right)\]
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t_0\right) + t_0} - 1\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))
   (*
    (- s)
    (log
     (-
      (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) t_0)) t_0))
      1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float t_0 = 1.0f / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)));
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / ((u * ((1.0f / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - 1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	t_0 = Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - Float32(1.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	t_0 = single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)));
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / ((u * ((single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - single(1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t_0\right) + t_0} - 1\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary32 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 7 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 98.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t_0\right) + t_0} - 1\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))
   (*
    (- s)
    (log
     (-
      (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) t_0)) t_0))
      1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float t_0 = 1.0f / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)));
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / ((u * ((1.0f / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - 1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	t_0 = Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - Float32(1.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	t_0 = single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)));
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / ((u * ((single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - single(1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t_0\right) + t_0} - 1\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 98.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{1}{\sqrt{s}} \cdot \frac{\pi}{\sqrt{s}}}}}\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  s
  (-
   (log
    (+
     -1.0
     (/
      1.0
      (-
       (/ u (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI (- s)))))
       (/ (+ u -1.0) (+ 1.0 (exp (* (/ 1.0 (sqrt s)) (/ PI (sqrt s)))))))))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * -logf((-1.0f + (1.0f / ((u / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / -s)))) - ((u + -1.0f) / (1.0f + expf(((1.0f / sqrtf(s)) * (((float) M_PI) / sqrtf(s))))))))));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(-log(Float32(Float32(-1.0) + Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / Float32(-s))))) - Float32(Float32(u + Float32(-1.0)) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / sqrt(s)) * Float32(Float32(pi) / sqrt(s))))))))))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * -log((single(-1.0) + (single(1.0) / ((u / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / -s)))) - ((u + single(-1.0)) / (single(1.0) + exp(((single(1.0) / sqrt(s)) * (single(pi) / sqrt(s))))))))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{1}{\sqrt{s}} \cdot \frac{\pi}{\sqrt{s}}}}}\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-un-lft-identity99.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\color{blue}{1 \cdot \pi}}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
    2. add-sqr-sqrt99.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{1 \cdot \pi}{\color{blue}{\sqrt{s} \cdot \sqrt{s}}}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
    3. times-frac99.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\sqrt{s}} \cdot \frac{\pi}{\sqrt{s}}}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  4. Applied egg-rr99.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\sqrt{s}} \cdot \frac{\pi}{\sqrt{s}}}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  5. Final simplification99.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{1}{\sqrt{s}} \cdot \frac{\pi}{\sqrt{s}}}}}\right)\right) \]

Alternative 2: 98.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\frac{\pi}{\sqrt{s}}}{\sqrt{s}}}}}\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  s
  (-
   (log
    (+
     -1.0
     (/
      1.0
      (-
       (/ u (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI (- s)))))
       (/ (+ u -1.0) (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (/ PI (sqrt s)) (sqrt s))))))))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * -logf((-1.0f + (1.0f / ((u / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / -s)))) - ((u + -1.0f) / (1.0f + expf(((((float) M_PI) / sqrtf(s)) / sqrtf(s)))))))));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(-log(Float32(Float32(-1.0) + Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / Float32(-s))))) - Float32(Float32(u + Float32(-1.0)) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(Float32(pi) / sqrt(s)) / sqrt(s)))))))))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * -log((single(-1.0) + (single(1.0) / ((u / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / -s)))) - ((u + single(-1.0)) / (single(1.0) + exp(((single(pi) / sqrt(s)) / sqrt(s)))))))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\frac{\pi}{\sqrt{s}}}{\sqrt{s}}}}}\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-un-lft-identity99.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\color{blue}{1 \cdot \pi}}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
    2. add-sqr-sqrt99.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{1 \cdot \pi}{\color{blue}{\sqrt{s} \cdot \sqrt{s}}}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
    3. times-frac99.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\sqrt{s}} \cdot \frac{\pi}{\sqrt{s}}}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  4. Applied egg-rr99.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\sqrt{s}} \cdot \frac{\pi}{\sqrt{s}}}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate-*l/99.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{\sqrt{s}}}{\sqrt{s}}}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
    2. *-lft-identity99.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\color{blue}{\frac{\pi}{\sqrt{s}}}}{\sqrt{s}}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  6. Simplified99.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\pi}{\sqrt{s}}}{\sqrt{s}}}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  7. Final simplification99.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\frac{\pi}{\sqrt{s}}}{\sqrt{s}}}}}\right)\right) \]

Alternative 3: 98.9% accurate, 1.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  s
  (-
   (log
    (+
     -1.0
     (/
      1.0
      (-
       (/ u (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI (- s)))))
       (/ (+ u -1.0) (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * -logf((-1.0f + (1.0f / ((u / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / -s)))) - ((u + -1.0f) / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s))))))));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(-log(Float32(Float32(-1.0) + Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / Float32(-s))))) - Float32(Float32(u + Float32(-1.0)) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))))))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * -log((single(-1.0) + (single(1.0) / ((u / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / -s)))) - ((u + single(-1.0)) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s))))))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Final simplification99.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)\right) \]

Alternative 4: 25.1% accurate, 3.5× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 2 \cdot \left(s \cdot u\right) - s \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (- (* 2.0 (* s u)) (* s (log1p (/ PI s)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return (2.0f * (s * u)) - (s * log1pf((((float) M_PI) / s)));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(Float32(2.0) * Float32(s * u)) - Float32(s * log1p(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
2 \cdot \left(s \cdot u\right) - s \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Taylor expanded in s around -inf 25.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + 4 \cdot \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{s}\right)}\right) \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative25.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(4 \cdot \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{s} + 1\right)}\right) \]
    2. fma-def25.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{s}, 1\right)\right)}\right) \]
  5. Simplified25.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, \frac{\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right) + u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right)}{s}, 1\right)\right)}\right) \]
  6. Taylor expanded in u around 0 25.2%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(s \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)\right) + 2 \cdot \frac{u \cdot \pi}{1 + \frac{\pi}{s}}} \]
  7. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative25.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \frac{u \cdot \pi}{1 + \frac{\pi}{s}} + -1 \cdot \left(s \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)\right)} \]
    2. mul-1-neg25.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \frac{u \cdot \pi}{1 + \frac{\pi}{s}} + \color{blue}{\left(-s \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)\right)} \]
    3. unsub-neg25.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \frac{u \cdot \pi}{1 + \frac{\pi}{s}} - s \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)} \]
    4. associate-*r/25.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)}{1 + \frac{\pi}{s}}} - s \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right) \]
    5. *-commutative25.2%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot u\right)}}{1 + \frac{\pi}{s}} - s \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right) \]
    6. +-commutative25.2%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot u\right)}{\color{blue}{\frac{\pi}{s} + 1}} - s \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right) \]
    7. log1p-def25.2%

      \[\leadsto \frac{2 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot u\right)}{\frac{\pi}{s} + 1} - s \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)} \]
  8. Simplified25.2%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot u\right)}{\frac{\pi}{s} + 1} - s \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)} \]
  9. Taylor expanded in s around 0 25.2%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(s \cdot u\right)} - s \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right) \]
  10. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-commutative25.2%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot s\right)} - s \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right) \]
  11. Simplified25.2%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(u \cdot s\right)} - s \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right) \]
  12. Final simplification25.2%

    \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(s \cdot u\right) - s \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right) \]

Alternative 5: 25.1% accurate, 3.6× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (* (- s) (log1p (/ PI s))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -s * log1pf((((float) M_PI) / s));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log1p(Float32(Float32(pi) / s)))
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Taylor expanded in s around -inf 25.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + 4 \cdot \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{s}\right)}\right) \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative25.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(4 \cdot \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{s} + 1\right)}\right) \]
    2. fma-def25.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{s}, 1\right)\right)}\right) \]
  5. Simplified25.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, \frac{\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right) + u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right)}{s}, 1\right)\right)}\right) \]
  6. Taylor expanded in u around 0 25.2%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(s \cdot \log \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)\right)} \]
  7. Step-by-step derivation
    1. log1p-def25.2%

      \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \left(s \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}\right) \]
    2. associate-*r*25.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot s\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)} \]
    3. neg-mul-125.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right)} \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right) \]
  8. Simplified25.2%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)} \]
  9. Final simplification25.2%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right) \]

Alternative 6: 11.5% accurate, 6.8× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.5 + -0.25\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (* 4.0 (* PI (+ (* u 0.5) -0.25))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return 4.0f * (((float) M_PI) * ((u * 0.5f) + -0.25f));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(4.0) * Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(Float32(u * Float32(0.5)) + Float32(-0.25))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = single(4.0) * (single(pi) * ((u * single(0.5)) + single(-0.25)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.5 + -0.25\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Taylor expanded in s around inf 11.5%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate--r+11.5%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) - 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)} \]
    2. cancel-sign-sub-inv11.5%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right)} \]
    3. distribute-rgt-out--11.5%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot \left(0.25 - -0.25\right)} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right) \]
    4. *-commutative11.5%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot u\right)} \cdot \left(0.25 - -0.25\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right) \]
    5. metadata-eval11.5%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot \color{blue}{0.5} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right) \]
    6. metadata-eval11.5%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{-0.25} \cdot \pi\right) \]
    7. *-commutative11.5%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\pi \cdot -0.25}\right) \]
  5. Simplified11.5%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25\right)} \]
  6. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate-*l*11.5%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.5\right)} + \pi \cdot -0.25\right) \]
    2. distribute-lft-out11.5%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.5 + -0.25\right)\right)} \]
  7. Applied egg-rr11.5%

    \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.5 + -0.25\right)\right)} \]
  8. Final simplification11.5%

    \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.5 + -0.25\right)\right) \]

Alternative 7: 11.2% accurate, 7.2× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -\pi \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (- PI))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -((float) M_PI);
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(-Float32(pi))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = -single(pi);
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
-\pi
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Taylor expanded in u around 0 11.3%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \pi} \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. neg-mul-111.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\pi} \]
  5. Simplified11.3%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\pi} \]
  6. Final simplification11.3%

    \[\leadsto -\pi \]

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2023309 
(FPCore (u s)
  :name "Sample trimmed logistic on [-pi, pi]"
  :precision binary32
  :pre (and (and (<= 2.328306437e-10 u) (<= u 1.0)) (and (<= 0.0 s) (<= s 1.0651631)))
  (* (- s) (log (- (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))) (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))) 1.0))))