System.Random.MWC.Distributions:gamma from mwc-random-0.13.3.2

Percentage Accurate: 99.9% → 99.9%

Time: 8.9s

Alternatives: 8

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x 0.5) (* y (+ (- 1.0 z) (log z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + log(z)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * 0.5d0) + (y * ((1.0d0 - z) + log(z)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + Math.log(z)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + math.log(z)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * 0.5) + Float64(y * Float64(Float64(1.0 - z) + log(z))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + log(z)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * N[(N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision] + N[Log[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x 0.5) (* y (+ (- 1.0 z) (log z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + log(z)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * 0.5d0) + (y * ((1.0d0 - z) + log(z)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + Math.log(z)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + math.log(z)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * 0.5) + Float64(y * Float64(Float64(1.0 - z) + log(z))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + log(z)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * N[(N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision] + N[Log[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.9% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(1 - z\right) + \log z, x \cdot 0.5\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (fma y (+ (- 1.0 z) (log z)) (* x 0.5)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return fma(y, ((1.0 - z) + log(z)), (x * 0.5));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return fma(y, Float64(Float64(1.0 - z) + log(z)), Float64(x * 0.5))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(y * N[(N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision] + N[Log[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) + x \cdot 0.5} \]

   2. fma-def 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(1 - z\right) + \log z, x \cdot 0.5\right)} \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(1 - z\right) + \log z, x \cdot 0.5\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(1 - z\right) + \log z, x \cdot 0.5\right) \]

Alternative 2: 84.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2 \cdot 10^{-36} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.3 \cdot 10^{-38}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y + y \cdot \left(\log z - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, -z, x \cdot 0.5\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -2e-36) (not (<= y 1.3e-38)))
   (+ y (* y (- (log z) z)))
   (fma y (- z) (* x 0.5))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -2e-36) || !(y <= 1.3e-38)) {
		tmp = y + (y * (log(z) - z));
	} else {
		tmp = fma(y, -z, (x * 0.5));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -2e-36) || !(y <= 1.3e-38))
		tmp = Float64(y + Float64(y * Float64(log(z) - z)));
	else
		tmp = fma(y, Float64(-z), Float64(x * 0.5));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -2e-36], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 1.3e-38]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y + N[(y * N[(N[Log[z], $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * (-z) + N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -1.9999999999999999e-36 or 1.30000000000000005e-38 < y

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(z - \log z\right)\right)} \]

   3. Applied egg-rr 99.8%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(z - \log z\right)\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-\left(z - \log z\right)\right)\right)} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-in 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(1 \cdot y + \left(-\left(z - \log z\right)\right) \cdot y\right)} \]

      3. *-un-lft-identity 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \left(\color{blue}{y} + \left(-\left(z - \log z\right)\right) \cdot y\right) \]

   5. Applied egg-rr 99.8%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(y + \left(-\left(z - \log z\right)\right) \cdot y\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 84.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + y \cdot \left(\log z - z\right)} \]

   if -1.9999999999999999e-36 < y < 1.30000000000000005e-38

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) + x \cdot 0.5} \]

      2. fma-def 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(1 - z\right) + \log z, x \cdot 0.5\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(1 - z\right) + \log z, x \cdot 0.5\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 87.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z}, x \cdot 0.5\right) \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 87.5%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{-z}, x \cdot 0.5\right) \]

   6. Simplified 87.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{-z}, x \cdot 0.5\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 86.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2 \cdot 10^{-36} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.3 \cdot 10^{-38}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y + y \cdot \left(\log z - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, -z, x \cdot 0.5\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 98.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 0.28:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\log z + 1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, -z, x \cdot 0.5\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z 0.28) (+ (* x 0.5) (* y (+ (log z) 1.0))) (fma y (- z) (* x 0.5))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= 0.28) {
		tmp = (x * 0.5) + (y * (log(z) + 1.0));
	} else {
		tmp = fma(y, -z, (x * 0.5));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= 0.28)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x * 0.5) + Float64(y * Float64(log(z) + 1.0)));
	else
		tmp = fma(y, Float64(-z), Float64(x * 0.5));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, 0.28], N[(N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * N[(N[Log[z], $MachinePrecision] + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * (-z) + N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < 0.28000000000000003

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around 0 97.8%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(1 + \log z\right)} \]

   if 0.28000000000000003 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) + x \cdot 0.5} \]

      2. fma-def 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(1 - z\right) + \log z, x \cdot 0.5\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(1 - z\right) + \log z, x \cdot 0.5\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 97.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z}, x \cdot 0.5\right) \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 97.7%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{-z}, x \cdot 0.5\right) \]

   6. Simplified 97.7%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{-z}, x \cdot 0.5\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 97.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 0.28:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\log z + 1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, -z, x \cdot 0.5\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x 0.5) (* y (+ (- 1.0 z) (log z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + log(z)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * 0.5d0) + (y * ((1.0d0 - z) + log(z)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + Math.log(z)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + math.log(z)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * 0.5) + Float64(y * Float64(Float64(1.0 - z) + log(z))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * 0.5) + (y * ((1.0 - z) + log(z)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * N[(N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision] + N[Log[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]

2. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]

Alternative 5: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(\log z - z\right) + 1\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (* x 0.5) (* y (+ (- (log z) z) 1.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * ((log(z) - z) + 1.0));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * 0.5d0) + (y * ((log(z) - z) + 1.0d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * ((Math.log(z) - z) + 1.0));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * 0.5) + (y * ((math.log(z) - z) + 1.0))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * 0.5) + Float64(y * Float64(Float64(log(z) - z) + 1.0)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * 0.5) + (y * ((log(z) - z) + 1.0));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * N[(N[(N[Log[z], $MachinePrecision] - z), $MachinePrecision] + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+l- 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(z - \log z\right)\right)} \]

3. Applied egg-rr 99.9%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(z - \log z\right)\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(\log z - z\right) + 1\right) \]

Alternative 6: 75.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(y, -z, x \cdot 0.5\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (fma y (- z) (* x 0.5)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return fma(y, -z, (x * 0.5));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return fma(y, Float64(-z), Float64(x * 0.5))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(y * (-z) + N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) + x \cdot 0.5} \]

   2. fma-def 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(1 - z\right) + \log z, x \cdot 0.5\right)} \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, \left(1 - z\right) + \log z, x \cdot 0.5\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 70.1%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{-1 \cdot z}, x \cdot 0.5\right) \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. mul-1-neg 70.1%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{-z}, x \cdot 0.5\right) \]

6. Simplified 70.1%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{-z}, x \cdot 0.5\right) \]

7. Final simplification 70.1%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, -z, x \cdot 0.5\right) \]

Alternative 7: 75.0% accurate, 15.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot 0.5 - y \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (* x 0.5) (* y z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 0.5) - (y * z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x * 0.5d0) - (y * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x * 0.5) - (y * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x * 0.5) - (y * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x * 0.5) - Float64(y * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x * 0.5) - (y * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+l- 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(z - \log z\right)\right)} \]

3. Applied egg-rr 99.9%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - \left(z - \log z\right)\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 70.1%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-*r* 70.1%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot y\right) \cdot z} \]

   2. neg-mul-1 70.1%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} \cdot z \]

6. Simplified 70.1%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot z} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

   1. distribute-lft-neg-out 70.1%

      \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot z\right)} \]

   2. unsub-neg 70.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.5 - y \cdot z} \]

8. Applied egg-rr 70.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.5 - y \cdot z} \]

9. Final simplification 70.1%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 - y \cdot z \]

Alternative 8: 40.7% accurate, 37.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot 0.5 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* x 0.5))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x * 0.5;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x * 0.5d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x * 0.5;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x * 0.5

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x * 0.5)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x * 0.5;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[x \cdot 0.5 + y \cdot \left(\left(1 - z\right) + \log z\right) \]

2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 39.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot x} \]

3. Final simplification 39.9%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 \]

Developer target: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(y + 0.5 \cdot x\right) - y \cdot \left(z - \log z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- (+ y (* 0.5 x)) (* y (- z (log z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (y + (0.5 * x)) - (y * (z - log(z)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (y + (0.5d0 * x)) - (y * (z - log(z)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (y + (0.5 * x)) - (y * (z - Math.log(z)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (y + (0.5 * x)) - (y * (z - math.log(z)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(y + Float64(0.5 * x)) - Float64(y * Float64(z - log(z))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (y + (0.5 * x)) - (y * (z - log(z)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(y + N[(0.5 * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * N[(z - N[Log[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023308 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "System.Random.MWC.Distributions:gamma from mwc-random-0.13.3.2"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (- (+ y (* 0.5 x)) (* y (- z (log z))))

  (+ (* x 0.5) (* y (+ (- 1.0 z) (log z)))))