Sample trimmed logistic on [-pi, pi]

Percentage Accurate: 98.9% → 98.9%
Time: 12.5s
Alternatives: 10
Speedup: 1.4×

Specification

?
\[\left(2.328306437 \cdot 10^{-10} \leq u \land u \leq 1\right) \land \left(0 \leq s \land s \leq 1.0651631\right)\]
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t_0\right) + t_0} - 1\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))
   (*
    (- s)
    (log
     (-
      (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) t_0)) t_0))
      1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float t_0 = 1.0f / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)));
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / ((u * ((1.0f / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - 1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	t_0 = Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - Float32(1.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	t_0 = single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)));
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / ((u * ((single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - single(1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t_0\right) + t_0} - 1\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary32 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 10 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 98.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t_0\right) + t_0} - 1\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))
   (*
    (- s)
    (log
     (-
      (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) t_0)) t_0))
      1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float t_0 = 1.0f / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)));
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / ((u * ((1.0f / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - 1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	t_0 = Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - Float32(1.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	t_0 = single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)));
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / ((u * ((single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - single(1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t_0\right) + t_0} - 1\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 98.9% accurate, 1.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  s
  (-
   (log
    (+
     -1.0
     (/
      1.0
      (-
       (/ u (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI (- s)))))
       (/ (+ u -1.0) (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * -logf((-1.0f + (1.0f / ((u / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / -s)))) - ((u + -1.0f) / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s))))))));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(-log(Float32(Float32(-1.0) + Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / Float32(-s))))) - Float32(Float32(u + Float32(-1.0)) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))))))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * -log((single(-1.0) + (single(1.0) / ((u / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / -s)))) - ((u + single(-1.0)) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s))))))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Final simplification99.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)\right) \]

Alternative 2: 98.6% accurate, 1.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{-1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  s
  (-
   (log
    (+
     -1.0
     (/
      1.0
      (-
       (/ u (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI (- s)))))
       (/ -1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * -logf((-1.0f + (1.0f / ((u / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / -s)))) - (-1.0f / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s))))))));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(-log(Float32(Float32(-1.0) + Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / Float32(-s))))) - Float32(Float32(-1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))))))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * -log((single(-1.0) + (single(1.0) / ((u / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / -s)))) - (single(-1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s))))))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{-1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Taylor expanded in u around 0 98.8%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \color{blue}{\frac{-1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  4. Final simplification98.8%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{-1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)\right) \]

Alternative 3: 37.7% accurate, 1.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ {\left(\sqrt[3]{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{u \cdot 0.5 - \frac{-1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)\right)}\right)}^{3} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (pow
  (cbrt
   (*
    s
    (- (log (+ -1.0 (/ 1.0 (- (* u 0.5) (/ -1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))))))))
  3.0))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return powf(cbrtf((s * -logf((-1.0f + (1.0f / ((u * 0.5f) - (-1.0f / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)))))))))), 3.0f);
}
function code(u, s)
	return cbrt(Float32(s * Float32(-log(Float32(Float32(-1.0) + Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u * Float32(0.5)) - Float32(Float32(-1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))))))))) ^ Float32(3.0)
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
{\left(\sqrt[3]{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{u \cdot 0.5 - \frac{-1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)\right)}\right)}^{3}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Taylor expanded in u around 0 98.8%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \color{blue}{\frac{-1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  4. Taylor expanded in s around inf 37.2%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + \color{blue}{1}} - \frac{-1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. add-cube-cbrt37.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt[3]{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + 1} - \frac{-1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \cdot \sqrt[3]{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + 1} - \frac{-1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)}\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + 1} - \frac{-1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)}} \]
    2. pow337.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + 1} - \frac{-1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)}\right)}^{3}} \]
  6. Applied egg-rr37.2%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{u \cdot 0.5 - \frac{-1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)\right)}\right)}^{3}} \]
  7. Final simplification37.2%

    \[\leadsto {\left(\sqrt[3]{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{u \cdot 0.5 - \frac{-1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)\right)}\right)}^{3} \]

Alternative 4: 37.7% accurate, 2.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{u \cdot 0.5 - \frac{-1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  s
  (- (log (+ -1.0 (/ 1.0 (- (* u 0.5) (/ -1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * -logf((-1.0f + (1.0f / ((u * 0.5f) - (-1.0f / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s))))))));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(-log(Float32(Float32(-1.0) + Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u * Float32(0.5)) - Float32(Float32(-1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))))))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * -log((single(-1.0) + (single(1.0) / ((u * single(0.5)) - (single(-1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s))))))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{u \cdot 0.5 - \frac{-1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Taylor expanded in u around 0 98.8%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \color{blue}{\frac{-1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  4. Taylor expanded in s around inf 37.2%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + \color{blue}{1}} - \frac{-1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. distribute-rgt-neg-out37.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + 1} - \frac{-1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
    2. +-commutative37.2%

      \[\leadsto -s \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + 1} - \frac{-1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)} \]
    3. div-inv37.2%

      \[\leadsto -s \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\color{blue}{u \cdot \frac{1}{1 + 1}} - \frac{-1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right) \]
    4. metadata-eval37.2%

      \[\leadsto -s \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{u \cdot \frac{1}{\color{blue}{2}} - \frac{-1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right) \]
    5. metadata-eval37.2%

      \[\leadsto -s \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{u \cdot \color{blue}{0.5} - \frac{-1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right) \]
  6. Applied egg-rr37.2%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{u \cdot 0.5 - \frac{-1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)} \]
  7. Final simplification37.2%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{u \cdot 0.5 - \frac{-1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)\right) \]

Alternative 5: 36.2% accurate, 3.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{2} - \frac{-1}{1 + \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  s
  (- (log (+ -1.0 (/ 1.0 (- (/ u 2.0) (/ -1.0 (+ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (/ PI s)))))))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * -logf((-1.0f + (1.0f / ((u / 2.0f) - (-1.0f / (1.0f + (1.0f + (((float) M_PI) / s))))))));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(-log(Float32(Float32(-1.0) + Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u / Float32(2.0)) - Float32(Float32(-1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + Float32(Float32(1.0) + Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))))))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * -log((single(-1.0) + (single(1.0) / ((u / single(2.0)) - (single(-1.0) / (single(1.0) + (single(1.0) + (single(pi) / s))))))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{2} - \frac{-1}{1 + \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Taylor expanded in u around 0 98.8%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \color{blue}{\frac{-1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  4. Taylor expanded in s around inf 37.2%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + \color{blue}{1}} - \frac{-1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  5. Taylor expanded in s around inf 35.1%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + 1} - \frac{-1}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  6. Final simplification35.1%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{2} - \frac{-1}{1 + \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}\right)\right) \]

Alternative 6: 11.6% accurate, 3.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right) + u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (* -4.0 (+ (* PI (+ (* u -0.25) 0.25)) (* u (* PI -0.25)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -4.0f * ((((float) M_PI) * ((u * -0.25f) + 0.25f)) + (u * (((float) M_PI) * -0.25f)));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(-4.0) * Float32(Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(Float32(u * Float32(-0.25)) + Float32(0.25))) + Float32(u * Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(-0.25)))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = single(-4.0) * ((single(pi) * ((u * single(-0.25)) + single(0.25))) + (u * (single(pi) * single(-0.25))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
-4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right) + u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Taylor expanded in s around -inf 12.2%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)\right)} \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate--r+12.2%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) - 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
    2. cancel-sign-sub-inv12.2%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
    3. cancel-sign-sub-inv12.2%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + \left(--0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right)} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    4. metadata-eval12.2%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + \color{blue}{0.25} \cdot \pi\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    5. associate-*r*12.2%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot u\right) \cdot \pi} + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    6. distribute-rgt-out12.2%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot u + 0.25\right)} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    7. *-commutative12.2%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(\color{blue}{u \cdot -0.25} + 0.25\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    8. metadata-eval12.2%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right) + \color{blue}{-0.25} \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    9. *-commutative12.2%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right) + \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot -0.25}\right) \]
    10. associate-*l*12.2%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right) + \color{blue}{u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right)}\right) \]
  5. Simplified12.2%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right) + u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right)\right)} \]
  6. Final simplification12.2%

    \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right) + u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25\right)\right) \]

Alternative 7: 11.6% accurate, 3.5× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.25 - \mathsf{fma}\left(u, -0.25, 0.25\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (* 4.0 (* PI (- (* u 0.25) (fma u -0.25 0.25)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return 4.0f * (((float) M_PI) * ((u * 0.25f) - fmaf(u, -0.25f, 0.25f)));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(4.0) * Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(Float32(u * Float32(0.25)) - fma(u, Float32(-0.25), Float32(0.25)))))
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.25 - \mathsf{fma}\left(u, -0.25, 0.25\right)\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Taylor expanded in s around inf 12.2%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. add-cube-cbrt12.2%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(\sqrt[3]{0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)} \cdot \sqrt[3]{0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)}\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)}\right)} \]
    2. pow312.2%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)}\right)}^{3}} \]
    3. associate-*r*12.2%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot {\left(\sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{\left(0.25 \cdot u\right) \cdot \pi} - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)}\right)}^{3} \]
    4. associate-*r*12.2%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot {\left(\sqrt[3]{\left(0.25 \cdot u\right) \cdot \pi - \left(\color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot u\right) \cdot \pi} + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)}\right)}^{3} \]
    5. *-commutative12.2%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot {\left(\sqrt[3]{\left(0.25 \cdot u\right) \cdot \pi - \left(\color{blue}{\left(u \cdot -0.25\right)} \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)}\right)}^{3} \]
    6. distribute-rgt-in12.2%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot {\left(\sqrt[3]{\left(0.25 \cdot u\right) \cdot \pi - \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right)}}\right)}^{3} \]
    7. fma-def12.2%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot {\left(\sqrt[3]{\left(0.25 \cdot u\right) \cdot \pi - \pi \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(u, -0.25, 0.25\right)}}\right)}^{3} \]
  5. Applied egg-rr12.2%

    \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{\left(0.25 \cdot u\right) \cdot \pi - \pi \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(u, -0.25, 0.25\right)}\right)}^{3}} \]
  6. Step-by-step derivation
    1. rem-cube-cbrt12.2%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(0.25 \cdot u\right) \cdot \pi - \pi \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(u, -0.25, 0.25\right)\right)} \]
    2. sub-neg12.2%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(0.25 \cdot u\right) \cdot \pi + \left(-\pi \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(u, -0.25, 0.25\right)\right)\right)} \]
    3. *-commutative12.2%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\pi \cdot \left(0.25 \cdot u\right)} + \left(-\pi \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(u, -0.25, 0.25\right)\right)\right) \]
    4. *-commutative12.2%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot 0.25\right)} + \left(-\pi \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(u, -0.25, 0.25\right)\right)\right) \]
  7. Applied egg-rr12.2%

    \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.25\right) + \left(-\pi \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(u, -0.25, 0.25\right)\right)\right)} \]
  8. Step-by-step derivation
    1. sub-neg12.2%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.25\right) - \pi \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(u, -0.25, 0.25\right)\right)} \]
    2. distribute-lft-out--12.2%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.25 - \mathsf{fma}\left(u, -0.25, 0.25\right)\right)\right)} \]
  9. Simplified12.2%

    \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.25 - \mathsf{fma}\left(u, -0.25, 0.25\right)\right)\right)} \]
  10. Final simplification12.2%

    \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.25 - \mathsf{fma}\left(u, -0.25, 0.25\right)\right)\right) \]

Alternative 8: 11.6% accurate, 3.5× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25 + 0.5 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (* 4.0 (+ (* PI -0.25) (* 0.5 (* u PI)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return 4.0f * ((((float) M_PI) * -0.25f) + (0.5f * (u * ((float) M_PI))));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(4.0) * Float32(Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(-0.25)) + Float32(Float32(0.5) * Float32(u * Float32(pi)))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = single(4.0) * ((single(pi) * single(-0.25)) + (single(0.5) * (u * single(pi))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25 + 0.5 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Taylor expanded in s around inf 12.2%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate--r+12.2%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) - 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)} \]
    2. cancel-sign-sub-inv12.2%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right)} \]
    3. distribute-rgt-out--12.2%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot \left(0.25 - -0.25\right)} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right) \]
    4. *-commutative12.2%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot u\right)} \cdot \left(0.25 - -0.25\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right) \]
    5. metadata-eval12.2%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot \color{blue}{0.5} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right) \]
    6. metadata-eval12.2%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{-0.25} \cdot \pi\right) \]
    7. *-commutative12.2%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\pi \cdot -0.25}\right) \]
  5. Simplified12.2%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25\right)} \]
  6. Final simplification12.2%

    \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot -0.25 + 0.5 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]

Alternative 9: 11.6% accurate, 6.8× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.5 + -0.25\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (* 4.0 (* PI (+ (* u 0.5) -0.25))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return 4.0f * (((float) M_PI) * ((u * 0.5f) + -0.25f));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(4.0) * Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(Float32(u * Float32(0.5)) + Float32(-0.25))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = single(4.0) * (single(pi) * ((u * single(0.5)) + single(-0.25)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.5 + -0.25\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Step-by-step derivation
    1. clear-num99.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{s}{\pi}}}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
    2. associate-/r/99.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{s} \cdot \pi}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  4. Applied egg-rr99.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{s} \cdot \pi}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  5. Taylor expanded in s around inf 12.2%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
  6. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate--r+12.2%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) - 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)} \]
    2. cancel-sign-sub-inv12.2%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right)} \]
    3. *-commutative12.2%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\left(0.25 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot u\right)} - -0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right) \]
    4. *-commutative12.2%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\left(0.25 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot u\right) - -0.25 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot u\right)}\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right) \]
    5. distribute-rgt-out--12.2%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot \left(0.25 - -0.25\right)} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right) \]
    6. metadata-eval12.2%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot \color{blue}{0.5} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right) \]
    7. *-commutative12.2%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \pi\right)} \cdot 0.5 + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right) \]
    8. *-commutative12.2%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right) \]
    9. metadata-eval12.2%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(0.5 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + \color{blue}{-0.25} \cdot \pi\right) \]
    10. +-commutative12.2%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.5 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
    11. *-commutative12.2%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 0.5}\right) \]
    12. *-commutative12.2%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot u\right)} \cdot 0.5\right) \]
    13. associate-*r*12.2%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.5\right)}\right) \]
    14. *-commutative12.2%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \pi}\right) \]
    15. distribute-rgt-out12.2%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 + u \cdot 0.5\right)\right)} \]
  7. Simplified12.2%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 + u \cdot 0.5\right)\right)} \]
  8. Final simplification12.2%

    \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.5 + -0.25\right)\right) \]

Alternative 10: 11.4% accurate, 7.2× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -\pi \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (- PI))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -((float) M_PI);
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(-Float32(pi))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = -single(pi);
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
-\pi
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.0%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified99.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Taylor expanded in u around 0 11.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \pi} \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. neg-mul-111.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\pi} \]
  5. Simplified11.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\pi} \]
  6. Final simplification11.9%

    \[\leadsto -\pi \]

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2023308 
(FPCore (u s)
  :name "Sample trimmed logistic on [-pi, pi]"
  :precision binary32
  :pre (and (and (<= 2.328306437e-10 u) (<= u 1.0)) (and (<= 0.0 s) (<= s 1.0651631)))
  (* (- s) (log (- (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))) (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))) 1.0))))