SynthBasics:moogVCF from YampaSynth-0.2

Percentage Accurate: 93.2% → 97.3%

Time: 12.3s

Alternatives: 10

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (* (* y z) (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y))));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + ((y * z) * (math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y))))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * z) * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 93.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (* (* y z) (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y))));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + ((y * z) * (math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y))))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * z) * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 97.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (* y (* z (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + (y * (z * (Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y)))));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + (y * (z * (math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y)))))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y))))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(z * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 95.1%

   \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-*l* 98.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

3. Simplified 98.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 98.0%

   \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right) \]

Alternative 2: 84.7% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -1.75 \cdot 10^{-87} \lor \neg \left(t \leq 1.5 \cdot 10^{-89}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{t}{y} - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= t -1.75e-87) (not (<= t 1.5e-89)))
   (+ x (* (tanh (/ t y)) (* y z)))
   (+ x (* (* y z) (- (/ t y) (tanh (/ x y)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((t <= -1.75e-87) || !(t <= 1.5e-89)) {
		tmp = x + (tanh((t / y)) * (y * z));
	} else {
		tmp = x + ((y * z) * ((t / y) - tanh((x / y))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((t <= (-1.75d-87)) .or. (.not. (t <= 1.5d-89))) then
        tmp = x + (tanh((t / y)) * (y * z))
    else
        tmp = x + ((y * z) * ((t / y) - tanh((x / y))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((t <= -1.75e-87) || !(t <= 1.5e-89)) {
		tmp = x + (Math.tanh((t / y)) * (y * z));
	} else {
		tmp = x + ((y * z) * ((t / y) - Math.tanh((x / y))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (t <= -1.75e-87) or not (t <= 1.5e-89):
		tmp = x + (math.tanh((t / y)) * (y * z))
	else:
		tmp = x + ((y * z) * ((t / y) - math.tanh((x / y))))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((t <= -1.75e-87) || !(t <= 1.5e-89))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) * Float64(y * z)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * z) * Float64(Float64(t / y) - tanh(Float64(x / y)))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((t <= -1.75e-87) || ~((t <= 1.5e-89)))
		tmp = x + (tanh((t / y)) * (y * z));
	else
		tmp = x + ((y * z) * ((t / y) - tanh((x / y))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[t, -1.75e-87], N[Not[LessEqual[t, 1.5e-89]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if t < -1.75000000000000006e-87 or 1.5e-89 < t

   1. Initial program 95.4%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l* 97.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 9.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 9.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)} \]

      2. associate-/r* 9.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right) \]

      3. div-sub 9.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}} \]

      4. rec-exp 9.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} \]

      5. rec-exp 9.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}} \]

      6. tanh-def-a 88.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 88.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]

   if -1.75000000000000006e-87 < t < 1.5e-89

   1. Initial program 94.7%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in t around 0 88.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{t}{y}} - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 88.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -1.75 \cdot 10^{-87} \lor \neg \left(t \leq 1.5 \cdot 10^{-89}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{t}{y} - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 73.1% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 9.8 \cdot 10^{-157}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 3.4 \cdot 10^{-54}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + t_1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(y \cdot t_1 - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (tanh (/ t y))))
   (if (<= y 9.8e-157)
     x
     (if (<= y 3.4e-54) (+ x (* t_1 (* y z))) (+ x (* z (- (* y t_1) x)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = tanh((t / y));
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 9.8e-157) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (y <= 3.4e-54) {
		tmp = x + (t_1 * (y * z));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * ((y * t_1) - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = tanh((t / y))
    if (y <= 9.8d-157) then
        tmp = x
    else if (y <= 3.4d-54) then
        tmp = x + (t_1 * (y * z))
    else
        tmp = x + (z * ((y * t_1) - x))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = Math.tanh((t / y));
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 9.8e-157) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (y <= 3.4e-54) {
		tmp = x + (t_1 * (y * z));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * ((y * t_1) - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	t_1 = math.tanh((t / y))
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 9.8e-157:
		tmp = x
	elif y <= 3.4e-54:
		tmp = x + (t_1 * (y * z))
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * ((y * t_1) - x))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = tanh(Float64(t / y))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 9.8e-157)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (y <= 3.4e-54)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(t_1 * Float64(y * z)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(Float64(y * t_1) - x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = tanh((t / y));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 9.8e-157)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (y <= 3.4e-54)
		tmp = x + (t_1 * (y * z));
	else
		tmp = x + (z * ((y * t_1) - x));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[y, 9.8e-157], x, If[LessEqual[y, 3.4e-54], N[(x + N[(t$95$1 * N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(z * N[(N[(y * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision] - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < 9.7999999999999995e-157

   1. Initial program 95.5%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l* 98.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 98.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 56.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 66.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 9.7999999999999995e-157 < y < 3.39999999999999987e-54

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 23.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 23.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)} \]

      2. associate-/r* 23.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right) \]

      3. div-sub 23.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}} \]

      4. rec-exp 23.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} \]

      5. rec-exp 23.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}} \]

      6. tanh-def-a 84.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 84.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]

   if 3.39999999999999987e-54 < y

   1. Initial program 92.3%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l* 95.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 95.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 49.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 49.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right) + -1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 84.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot y + \left(-x\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 72.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 9.8 \cdot 10^{-157}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 3.4 \cdot 10^{-54}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(y \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 72.8% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 10^{-156}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 6.5 \cdot 10^{+138}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 1e-156)
   x
   (if (<= y 6.5e+138) (+ x (* (tanh (/ t y)) (* y z))) (+ x (* z (- t x))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1e-156) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (y <= 6.5e+138) {
		tmp = x + (tanh((t / y)) * (y * z));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 1d-156) then
        tmp = x
    else if (y <= 6.5d+138) then
        tmp = x + (tanh((t / y)) * (y * z))
    else
        tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1e-156) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (y <= 6.5e+138) {
		tmp = x + (Math.tanh((t / y)) * (y * z));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 1e-156:
		tmp = x
	elif y <= 6.5e+138:
		tmp = x + (math.tanh((t / y)) * (y * z))
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 1e-156)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (y <= 6.5e+138)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) * Float64(y * z)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(t - x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 1e-156)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (y <= 6.5e+138)
		tmp = x + (tanh((t / y)) * (y * z));
	else
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y, 1e-156], x, If[LessEqual[y, 6.5e+138], N[(x + N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < 1.00000000000000004e-156

   1. Initial program 95.5%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l* 98.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 98.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 56.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 66.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 1.00000000000000004e-156 < y < 6.50000000000000054e138

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l* 98.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 98.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 28.2%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 28.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)} \]

      2. associate-/r* 28.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right) \]

      3. div-sub 28.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}} \]

      4. rec-exp 28.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} \]

      5. rec-exp 28.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}} \]

      6. tanh-def-a 79.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 79.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]

   if 6.50000000000000054e138 < y

   1. Initial program 82.7%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l* 92.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 92.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 93.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 72.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 10^{-156}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 6.5 \cdot 10^{+138}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 69.2% accurate, 23.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 4600000000:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 4600000000.0) x (+ x (* z (- t x)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 4600000000.0) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 4600000000.0d0) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 4600000000.0) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 4600000000.0:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 4600000000.0)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(t - x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 4600000000.0)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y, 4600000000.0], x, N[(x + N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 4.6e9

   1. Initial program 96.3%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l* 99.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 56.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 66.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 4.6e9 < y

   1. Initial program 90.1%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l* 93.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 93.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 78.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 68.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 4600000000:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6: 62.6% accurate, 30.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.85 \cdot 10^{-52}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (if (<= y 1.85e-52) x (* x (- 1.0 z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.85e-52) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 1.85d-52) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = x * (1.0d0 - z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.85e-52) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 1.85e-52:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 1.85e-52)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(1.0 - z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 1.85e-52)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y, 1.85e-52], x, N[(x * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 1.8499999999999999e-52

   1. Initial program 96.0%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l* 98.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 56.1%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 66.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 1.8499999999999999e-52 < y

   1. Initial program 92.3%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l* 95.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 95.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 75.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 59.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 59.1%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)}\right) \]

      2. unsub-neg 59.1%

         \[\leadsto x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right)} \]

   7. Simplified 59.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 64.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.85 \cdot 10^{-52}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 7: 62.5% accurate, 30.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 4.7 \cdot 10^{+107}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (if (<= z 4.7e+107) x (* z (- t x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= 4.7e+107) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = z * (t - x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= 4.7d+107) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = z * (t - x)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= 4.7e+107) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = z * (t - x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= 4.7e+107:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = z * (t - x)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= 4.7e+107)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(t - x));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= 4.7e+107)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = z * (t - x);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[z, 4.7e+107], x, N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < 4.7000000000000001e107

   1. Initial program 97.4%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l* 99.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 59.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 68.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 4.7000000000000001e107 < z

   1. Initial program 82.0%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l* 92.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 92.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 69.1%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 69.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 68.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 4.7 \cdot 10^{+107}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 8: 65.8% accurate, 30.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 9.5 \cdot 10^{+15}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (if (<= y 9.5e+15) x (+ x (* z t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 9.5e+15) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 9.5d+15) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = x + (z * t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 9.5e+15) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 9.5e+15:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 9.5e+15)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 9.5e+15)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = x + (z * t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y, 9.5e+15], x, N[(x + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 9.5e15

   1. Initial program 96.3%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l* 99.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 56.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 66.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 9.5e15 < y

   1. Initial program 89.4%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l* 93.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 93.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 35.1%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 34.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)} \]

      2. associate-/r* 34.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right) \]

      3. div-sub 34.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}} \]

      4. rec-exp 34.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} \]

      5. rec-exp 34.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}} \]

      6. tanh-def-a 74.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 74.4%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in y around inf 66.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 66.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot t} \]

   9. Simplified 66.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot t} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 66.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 9.5 \cdot 10^{+15}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 9: 59.7% accurate, 35.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 2.5 \cdot 10^{+171}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(-z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (if (<= z 2.5e+171) x (* x (- z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= 2.5e+171) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x * -z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= 2.5d+171) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = x * -z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= 2.5e+171) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x * -z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= 2.5e+171:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = x * -z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= 2.5e+171)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(-z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= 2.5e+171)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = x * -z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[z, 2.5e+171], x, N[(x * (-z)), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < 2.5000000000000002e171

   1. Initial program 95.5%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l* 98.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 98.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 59.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 65.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 2.5000000000000002e171 < z

   1. Initial program 89.7%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l* 94.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 94.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 79.4%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)}{y}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 74.2%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{z}{\frac{y}{t - x}}} \]

   6. Simplified 74.2%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{z}{\frac{y}{t - x}}} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in t around 0 44.4%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \frac{x \cdot z}{y}\right)} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 44.4%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{x \cdot z}{y}\right)} \]

      2. associate-/l* 43.8%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{x}{\frac{y}{z}}}\right) \]

      3. distribute-neg-frac 43.8%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{-x}{\frac{y}{z}}} \]

   9. Simplified 43.8%

      \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{-x}{\frac{y}{z}}} \]
   10. Step-by-step derivation

       1. distribute-frac-neg 43.8%

          \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{x}{\frac{y}{z}}\right)} \]

       2. distribute-rgt-neg-out 43.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-y \cdot \frac{x}{\frac{y}{z}}\right)} \]

       3. div-inv 43.7%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(-y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot \frac{1}{\frac{y}{z}}\right)}\right) \]

       4. add-sqr-sqrt 27.5%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(-y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{x} \cdot \sqrt{x}\right)} \cdot \frac{1}{\frac{y}{z}}\right)\right) \]

       5. sqrt-unprod 27.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(-y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\sqrt{x \cdot x}} \cdot \frac{1}{\frac{y}{z}}\right)\right) \]

       6. sqr-neg 27.8%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(-y \cdot \left(\sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(-x\right) \cdot \left(-x\right)}} \cdot \frac{1}{\frac{y}{z}}\right)\right) \]

       7. sqrt-unprod 0.4%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(-y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{-x} \cdot \sqrt{-x}\right)} \cdot \frac{1}{\frac{y}{z}}\right)\right) \]

       8. add-sqr-sqrt 1.2%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(-y \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-x\right)} \cdot \frac{1}{\frac{y}{z}}\right)\right) \]

       9. clear-num 1.2%

          \[\leadsto x + \left(-y \cdot \left(\left(-x\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{z}{y}}\right)\right) \]

       10. associate-*r* 1.0%

           \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(-x\right)\right) \cdot \frac{z}{y}}\right) \]

       11. clear-num 1.0%

           \[\leadsto x + \left(-\left(y \cdot \left(-x\right)\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{y}{z}}}\right) \]

       12. div-inv 1.1%

           \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(-x\right)}{\frac{y}{z}}}\right) \]

       13. associate-*r/ 1.3%

           \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{-x}{\frac{y}{z}}}\right) \]

       14. sub-neg 1.3%

           \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - y \cdot \frac{-x}{\frac{y}{z}}} \]

       15. associate-*r/ 1.1%

           \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot \left(-x\right)}{\frac{y}{z}}} \]

       16. div-inv 1.0%

           \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(-x\right)\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\frac{y}{z}}} \]

       17. clear-num 1.0%

           \[\leadsto x - \left(y \cdot \left(-x\right)\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{z}{y}} \]

       18. associate-*r* 1.2%

           \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(\left(-x\right) \cdot \frac{z}{y}\right)} \]

   11. Applied egg-rr 43.6%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - y \cdot \left(x \cdot \frac{z}{y}\right)} \]
   12. Step-by-step derivation

       1. associate-*r/ 44.4%

          \[\leadsto x - y \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{x \cdot z}{y}} \]

       2. associate-*l/ 44.4%

          \[\leadsto x - y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{y} \cdot z\right)} \]

       3. *-commutative 44.4%

          \[\leadsto x - y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot \frac{x}{y}\right)} \]

   13. Simplified 44.4%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - y \cdot \left(z \cdot \frac{x}{y}\right)} \]

   14. Taylor expanded in z around inf 44.7%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)} \]
   15. Step-by-step derivation

       1. mul-1-neg 44.7%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-x \cdot z} \]

       2. *-commutative 44.7%

          \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{z \cdot x} \]

       3. distribute-rgt-neg-in 44.7%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(-x\right)} \]

   16. Simplified 44.7%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(-x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 63.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 2.5 \cdot 10^{+171}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(-z\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 10: 60.1% accurate, 213.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 95.1%

   \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-*l* 98.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

3. Simplified 98.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 61.0%

   \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]

5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 61.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

6. Final simplification 61.7%

   \[\leadsto x \]

Developer target: 97.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (* y (* z (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + (y * (z * (Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y)))));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + (y * (z * (math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y)))))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y))))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(z * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023306 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "SynthBasics:moogVCF from YampaSynth-0.2"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (+ x (* y (* z (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))

  (+ x (* (* y z) (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))