b parameter of renormalized beta distribution

Percentage Accurate: 99.9% → 99.9%

Time: 6.3s

Alternatives: 10

Speedup: 1.0×

• 41.7% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

\[\left(0 < m \land 0 < v\right) \land v < 0.25\]

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (* (- (/ (* m (- 1.0 m)) v) 1.0) (- 1.0 m)))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = (((m * (1.0d0 - m)) / v) - 1.0d0) * (1.0d0 - m)
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m);
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m)

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(m * Float64(1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * Float64(1.0 - m))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m);
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(m * N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (* (- (/ (* m (- 1.0 m)) v) 1.0) (- 1.0 m)))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = (((m * (1.0d0 - m)) / v) - 1.0d0) * (1.0d0 - m)
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m);
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m)

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(m * Float64(1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * Float64(1.0 - m))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = (((m * (1.0 - m)) / v) - 1.0) * (1.0 - m);
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(m * N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}} + -1\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (* (- 1.0 m) (+ (/ m (/ v (- 1.0 m))) -1.0)))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return (1.0 - m) * ((m / (v / (1.0 - m))) + -1.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = (1.0d0 - m) * ((m / (v / (1.0d0 - m))) + (-1.0d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return (1.0 - m) * ((m / (v / (1.0 - m))) + -1.0);
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return (1.0 - m) * ((m / (v / (1.0 - m))) + -1.0)

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(Float64(1.0 - m) * Float64(Float64(m / Float64(v / Float64(1.0 - m))) + -1.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = (1.0 - m) * ((m / (v / (1.0 - m))) + -1.0);
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(m / N[(v / N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

   2. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

   3. associate-/l* 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

   4. metadata-eval 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}} + -1\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}} + -1\right) \]

Alternative 2: 98.1% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(-1 - m \cdot \frac{m}{v}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 1.0)
   (* (- 1.0 m) (+ -1.0 (/ m v)))
   (* (- 1.0 m) (- -1.0 (* m (/ m v))))))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.0) {
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * (-1.0 + (m / v));
	} else {
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * (-1.0 - (m * (m / v)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 1.0d0) then
        tmp = (1.0d0 - m) * ((-1.0d0) + (m / v))
    else
        tmp = (1.0d0 - m) * ((-1.0d0) - (m * (m / v)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.0) {
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * (-1.0 + (m / v));
	} else {
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * (-1.0 - (m * (m / v)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 1.0:
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * (-1.0 + (m / v))
	else:
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * (-1.0 - (m * (m / v)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 1.0)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 - m) * Float64(-1.0 + Float64(m / v)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 - m) * Float64(-1.0 - Float64(m * Float64(m / v))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 1.0)
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * (-1.0 + (m / v));
	else
		tmp = (1.0 - m) * (-1.0 - (m * (m / v)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[m, 1.0], N[(N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision] * N[(-1.0 + N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision] * N[(-1.0 - N[(m * N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 1

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in m around 0 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\frac{\color{blue}{m}}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]

   if 1 < m

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}} + -1\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. clear-num 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{\frac{v}{1 - m}}{m}}} + -1\right) \]

      2. associate-/r/ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{v}{1 - m}} \cdot m} + -1\right) \]

      3. clear-num 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{1 - m}{v}} \cdot m + -1\right) \]

   5. Applied egg-rr 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{1 - m}{v} \cdot m} + -1\right) \]

   6. Taylor expanded in m around inf 96.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \frac{m}{v}\right)} \cdot m + -1\right) \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. neg-mul-1 96.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-\frac{m}{v}\right)} \cdot m + -1\right) \]

      2. distribute-neg-frac 96.8%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{-m}{v}} \cdot m + -1\right) \]

   8. Simplified 96.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{-m}{v}} \cdot m + -1\right) \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 97.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(-1 - m \cdot \frac{m}{v}\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(-1 + m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (* (- 1.0 m) (+ -1.0 (* m (/ (- 1.0 m) v)))))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return (1.0 - m) * (-1.0 + (m * ((1.0 - m) / v)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = (1.0d0 - m) * ((-1.0d0) + (m * ((1.0d0 - m) / v)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return (1.0 - m) * (-1.0 + (m * ((1.0 - m) / v)));
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return (1.0 - m) * (-1.0 + (m * ((1.0 - m) / v)))

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(Float64(1.0 - m) * Float64(-1.0 + Float64(m * Float64(Float64(1.0 - m) / v))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = (1.0 - m) * (-1.0 + (m * ((1.0 - m) / v)));
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision] * N[(-1.0 + N[(m * N[(N[(1.0 - m), $MachinePrecision] / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

   2. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

   3. associate-/l* 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

   4. metadata-eval 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}} + -1\right)} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. clear-num 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{\frac{v}{1 - m}}{m}}} + -1\right) \]

   2. associate-/r/ 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{v}{1 - m}} \cdot m} + -1\right) \]

   3. clear-num 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{1 - m}{v}} \cdot m + -1\right) \]

5. Applied egg-rr 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{1 - m}{v} \cdot m} + -1\right) \]

6. Final simplification 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(-1 + m \cdot \frac{1 - m}{v}\right) \]

Alternative 4: 73.7% accurate, 1.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 5.5 \cdot 10^{-148}:\\ \;\;\;\;-1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 + m\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 5.5e-148) -1.0 (* (/ m v) (+ 1.0 m))))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 5.5e-148) {
		tmp = -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = (m / v) * (1.0 + m);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 5.5d-148) then
        tmp = -1.0d0
    else
        tmp = (m / v) * (1.0d0 + m)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 5.5e-148) {
		tmp = -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = (m / v) * (1.0 + m);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 5.5e-148:
		tmp = -1.0
	else:
		tmp = (m / v) * (1.0 + m)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 5.5e-148)
		tmp = -1.0;
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(m / v) * Float64(1.0 + m));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 5.5e-148)
		tmp = -1.0;
	else
		tmp = (m / v) * (1.0 + m);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[m, 5.5e-148], -1.0, N[(N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 + m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 5.5000000000000003e-148

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}} + -1\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in m around 0 71.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1} \]

   if 5.5000000000000003e-148 < m

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in m around 0 33.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(\frac{\color{blue}{m}}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 33.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(\frac{m}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-m\right)\right)} \]

      2. distribute-lft-in 33.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m}{v} - 1\right) \cdot 1 + \left(\frac{m}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(-m\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 33.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} - 1\right)} + \left(\frac{m}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(-m\right) \]

      4. *-un-lft-identity 33.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m}{v} - 1\right)} + \left(\frac{m}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(-m\right) \]

      5. sub-neg 33.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} + \left(\frac{m}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(-m\right) \]

      6. metadata-eval 33.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(\frac{m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) + \left(\frac{m}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(-m\right) \]

      7. +-commutative 33.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right)} + \left(\frac{m}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(-m\right) \]

      8. sub-neg 33.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right) + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \cdot \left(-m\right) \]

      9. metadata-eval 33.3%

         \[\leadsto \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right) + \left(\frac{m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \cdot \left(-m\right) \]

      10. +-commutative 33.3%

          \[\leadsto \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right)} \cdot \left(-m\right) \]

      11. add-sqr-sqrt 0.0%

          \[\leadsto \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right) + \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{-m} \cdot \sqrt{-m}\right)} \]

      12. sqrt-unprod 83.6%

          \[\leadsto \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right) + \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(-m\right) \cdot \left(-m\right)}} \]

      13. sqr-neg 83.6%

          \[\leadsto \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right) + \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right) \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{m \cdot m}} \]

      14. sqrt-prod 83.6%

          \[\leadsto \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right) + \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{m} \cdot \sqrt{m}\right)} \]

      15. add-sqr-sqrt 83.6%

          \[\leadsto \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right) + \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right) \cdot \color{blue}{m} \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 83.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right) + \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right) \cdot m} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 83.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right) + \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right)} \]

      2. distribute-rgt1-in 83.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(m + 1\right) \cdot \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 83.6%

         \[\leadsto \left(m + 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 83.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(m + 1\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in m around inf 74.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(m + 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{m}{v}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 74.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 5.5 \cdot 10^{-148}:\\ \;\;\;\;-1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 + m\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 87.8% accurate, 1.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 2.4:\\ \;\;\;\;-1 + \left(m + \frac{m}{v}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 + m\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= m 2.4) (+ -1.0 (+ m (/ m v))) (* (/ m v) (+ 1.0 m))))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 2.4) {
		tmp = -1.0 + (m + (m / v));
	} else {
		tmp = (m / v) * (1.0 + m);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 2.4d0) then
        tmp = (-1.0d0) + (m + (m / v))
    else
        tmp = (m / v) * (1.0d0 + m)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 2.4) {
		tmp = -1.0 + (m + (m / v));
	} else {
		tmp = (m / v) * (1.0 + m);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 2.4:
		tmp = -1.0 + (m + (m / v))
	else:
		tmp = (m / v) * (1.0 + m)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 2.4)
		tmp = Float64(-1.0 + Float64(m + Float64(m / v)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(m / v) * Float64(1.0 + m));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 2.4)
		tmp = -1.0 + (m + (m / v));
	else
		tmp = (m / v) * (1.0 + m);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[m, 2.4], N[(-1.0 + N[(m + N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 + m), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 2.39999999999999991

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}} + -1\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in m around 0 97.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{v}\right) - 1} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 45.5%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{v} + 1\right)} \]

      2. distribute-lft-in 45.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1}{v} + m \cdot 1} \]

      3. div-inv 45.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m}{v}} + m \cdot 1 \]

      4. *-rgt-identity 45.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{m}{v} + \color{blue}{m} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 97.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m}{v} + m\right)} - 1 \]

   if 2.39999999999999991 < m

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in m around 0 0.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(\frac{\color{blue}{m}}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 0.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(\frac{m}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-m\right)\right)} \]

      2. distribute-lft-in 0.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m}{v} - 1\right) \cdot 1 + \left(\frac{m}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(-m\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 0.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} - 1\right)} + \left(\frac{m}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(-m\right) \]

      4. *-un-lft-identity 0.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m}{v} - 1\right)} + \left(\frac{m}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(-m\right) \]

      5. sub-neg 0.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} + \left(\frac{m}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(-m\right) \]

      6. metadata-eval 0.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(\frac{m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) + \left(\frac{m}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(-m\right) \]

      7. +-commutative 0.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right)} + \left(\frac{m}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(-m\right) \]

      8. sub-neg 0.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right) + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \cdot \left(-m\right) \]

      9. metadata-eval 0.1%

         \[\leadsto \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right) + \left(\frac{m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \cdot \left(-m\right) \]

      10. +-commutative 0.1%

          \[\leadsto \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right)} \cdot \left(-m\right) \]

      11. add-sqr-sqrt 0.0%

          \[\leadsto \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right) + \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{-m} \cdot \sqrt{-m}\right)} \]

      12. sqrt-unprod 77.7%

          \[\leadsto \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right) + \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(-m\right) \cdot \left(-m\right)}} \]

      13. sqr-neg 77.7%

          \[\leadsto \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right) + \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right) \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{m \cdot m}} \]

      14. sqrt-prod 77.7%

          \[\leadsto \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right) + \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{m} \cdot \sqrt{m}\right)} \]

      15. add-sqr-sqrt 77.7%

          \[\leadsto \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right) + \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right) \cdot \color{blue}{m} \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 77.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right) + \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right) \cdot m} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 77.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right) + \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right)} \]

      2. distribute-rgt1-in 77.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(m + 1\right) \cdot \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 77.7%

         \[\leadsto \left(m + 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 77.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(m + 1\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in m around inf 77.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(m + 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{m}{v}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 88.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 2.4:\\ \;\;\;\;-1 + \left(m + \frac{m}{v}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{m}{v} \cdot \left(1 + m\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6: 87.7% accurate, 1.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(1 + m\right) \cdot \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (* (+ 1.0 m) (+ -1.0 (/ m v))))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return (1.0 + m) * (-1.0 + (m / v));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = (1.0d0 + m) * ((-1.0d0) + (m / v))
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return (1.0 + m) * (-1.0 + (m / v));
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return (1.0 + m) * (-1.0 + (m / v))

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(Float64(1.0 + m) * Float64(-1.0 + Float64(m / v)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = (1.0 + m) * (-1.0 + (m / v));
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(N[(1.0 + m), $MachinePrecision] * N[(-1.0 + N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]

2. Taylor expanded in m around 0 52.6%

   \[\leadsto \left(\frac{\color{blue}{m}}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 52.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(\frac{m}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-m\right)\right)} \]

   2. distribute-lft-in 52.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m}{v} - 1\right) \cdot 1 + \left(\frac{m}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(-m\right)} \]

   3. *-commutative 52.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} - 1\right)} + \left(\frac{m}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(-m\right) \]

   4. *-un-lft-identity 52.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m}{v} - 1\right)} + \left(\frac{m}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(-m\right) \]

   5. sub-neg 52.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} + \left(\frac{m}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(-m\right) \]

   6. metadata-eval 52.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(\frac{m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) + \left(\frac{m}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(-m\right) \]

   7. +-commutative 52.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right)} + \left(\frac{m}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(-m\right) \]

   8. sub-neg 52.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right) + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \cdot \left(-m\right) \]

   9. metadata-eval 52.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right) + \left(\frac{m}{v} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \cdot \left(-m\right) \]

   10. +-commutative 52.6%

       \[\leadsto \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right)} \cdot \left(-m\right) \]

   11. add-sqr-sqrt 0.0%

       \[\leadsto \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right) + \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{-m} \cdot \sqrt{-m}\right)} \]

   12. sqrt-unprod 88.3%

       \[\leadsto \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right) + \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{\left(-m\right) \cdot \left(-m\right)}} \]

   13. sqr-neg 88.3%

       \[\leadsto \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right) + \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right) \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{m \cdot m}} \]

   14. sqrt-prod 88.3%

       \[\leadsto \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right) + \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{m} \cdot \sqrt{m}\right)} \]

   15. add-sqr-sqrt 88.3%

       \[\leadsto \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right) + \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right) \cdot \color{blue}{m} \]

4. Applied egg-rr 88.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right) + \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right) \cdot m} \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 88.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right) + \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right)} \]

   2. distribute-rgt1-in 88.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(m + 1\right) \cdot \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right)} \]

   3. +-commutative 88.3%

      \[\leadsto \left(m + 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right)} \]

6. Simplified 88.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(m + 1\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{v} + -1\right)} \]

7. Final simplification 88.3%

   \[\leadsto \left(1 + m\right) \cdot \left(-1 + \frac{m}{v}\right) \]

Alternative 7: 61.8% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1.16 \cdot 10^{-147}:\\ \;\;\;\;-1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;m + \frac{m}{v}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (if (<= m 1.16e-147) -1.0 (+ m (/ m v))))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.16e-147) {
		tmp = -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = m + (m / v);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 1.16d-147) then
        tmp = -1.0d0
    else
        tmp = m + (m / v)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.16e-147) {
		tmp = -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = m + (m / v);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 1.16e-147:
		tmp = -1.0
	else:
		tmp = m + (m / v)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 1.16e-147)
		tmp = -1.0;
	else
		tmp = Float64(m + Float64(m / v));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 1.16e-147)
		tmp = -1.0;
	else
		tmp = m + (m / v);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[m, 1.16e-147], -1.0, N[(m + N[(m / v), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 1.1599999999999999e-147

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}} + -1\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in m around 0 71.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1} \]

   if 1.1599999999999999e-147 < m

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}} + -1\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in m around 0 67.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{v}\right) - 1} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in m around inf 58.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{v}\right)} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 58.9%

         \[\leadsto m \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{v} + 1\right)} \]

      2. distribute-lft-in 58.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \frac{1}{v} + m \cdot 1} \]

      3. div-inv 59.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m}{v}} + m \cdot 1 \]

      4. *-rgt-identity 59.0%

         \[\leadsto \frac{m}{v} + \color{blue}{m} \]

   7. Applied egg-rr 59.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{m}{v} + m} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 62.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1.16 \cdot 10^{-147}:\\ \;\;\;\;-1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;m + \frac{m}{v}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 8: 27.1% accurate, 4.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1.1 \cdot 10^{-46}:\\ \;\;\;\;-1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;m\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (if (<= m 1.1e-46) -1.0 m))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.1e-46) {
		tmp = -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = m;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (m <= 1.1d-46) then
        tmp = -1.0d0
    else
        tmp = m
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	double tmp;
	if (m <= 1.1e-46) {
		tmp = -1.0;
	} else {
		tmp = m;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	tmp = 0
	if m <= 1.1e-46:
		tmp = -1.0
	else:
		tmp = m
	return tmp

Julia

function code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (m <= 1.1e-46)
		tmp = -1.0;
	else
		tmp = m;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(m, v)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (m <= 1.1e-46)
		tmp = -1.0;
	else
		tmp = m;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := If[LessEqual[m, 1.1e-46], -1.0, m]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if m < 1.1e-46

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}} + -1\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in m around 0 58.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1} \]

   if 1.1e-46 < m

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

      3. associate-/l* 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

      4. metadata-eval 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}} + -1\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in m around 0 58.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{v}\right) - 1} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in m around inf 57.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m \cdot \left(1 + \frac{1}{v}\right)} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in v around inf 5.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{m} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 29.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;m \leq 1.1 \cdot 10^{-46}:\\ \;\;\;\;-1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;m\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 9: 27.3% accurate, 4.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ m + -1 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 (+ m -1.0))

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return m + -1.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = m + (-1.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return m + -1.0;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return m + -1.0

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return Float64(m + -1.0)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = m + -1.0;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := N[(m + -1.0), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

   2. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

   3. associate-/l* 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

   4. metadata-eval 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}} + -1\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in v around inf 29.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(1 - m\right)} \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. neg-mul-1 29.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\left(1 - m\right)} \]

   2. neg-sub0 29.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0 - \left(1 - m\right)} \]

   3. associate--r- 29.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(0 - 1\right) + m} \]

   4. metadata-eval 29.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1} + m \]

6. Simplified 29.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 + m} \]

7. Final simplification 29.5%

   \[\leadsto m + -1 \]

Alternative 10: 24.9% accurate, 13.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -1 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (m v) :precision binary64 -1.0)

C

double code(double m, double v) {
	return -1.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(m, v)
    real(8), intent (in) :: m
    real(8), intent (in) :: v
    code = -1.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double m, double v) {
	return -1.0;
}

Python

def code(m, v):
	return -1.0

Julia

function code(m, v)
	return -1.0
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(m, v)
	tmp = -1.0;
end

Wolfram

code[m_, v_] := -1.0

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right) \cdot \left(1 - m\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} - 1\right)} \]

   2. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{m \cdot \left(1 - m\right)}{v} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]

   3. associate-/l* 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]

   4. metadata-eval 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - m\right) \cdot \left(\frac{m}{\frac{v}{1 - m}} + -1\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in m around 0 27.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1} \]

5. Final simplification 27.2%

   \[\leadsto -1 \]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023305 
(FPCore (m v)
  :name "b parameter of renormalized beta distribution"
  :precision binary64
  :pre (and (and (< 0.0 m) (< 0.0 v)) (< v 0.25))
  (* (- (/ (* m (- 1.0 m)) v) 1.0) (- 1.0 m)))