Quadratic roots, narrow range

Percentage Accurate: 55.4% → 91.4%
Time: 12.3s
Alternatives: 9
Speedup: 29.0×

Specification

?
\[\left(\left(1.0536712127723509 \cdot 10^{-8} < a \land a < 94906265.62425156\right) \land \left(1.0536712127723509 \cdot 10^{-8} < b \land b < 94906265.62425156\right)\right) \land \left(1.0536712127723509 \cdot 10^{-8} < c \land c < 94906265.62425156\right)\]
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{\left(-b\right) + \sqrt{b \cdot b - \left(4 \cdot a\right) \cdot c}}{2 \cdot a} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (a b c)
 :precision binary64
 (/ (+ (- b) (sqrt (- (* b b) (* (* 4.0 a) c)))) (* 2.0 a)))
double code(double a, double b, double c) {
	return (-b + sqrt(((b * b) - ((4.0 * a) * c)))) / (2.0 * a);
}
real(8) function code(a, b, c)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    code = (-b + sqrt(((b * b) - ((4.0d0 * a) * c)))) / (2.0d0 * a)
end function
public static double code(double a, double b, double c) {
	return (-b + Math.sqrt(((b * b) - ((4.0 * a) * c)))) / (2.0 * a);
}
def code(a, b, c):
	return (-b + math.sqrt(((b * b) - ((4.0 * a) * c)))) / (2.0 * a)
function code(a, b, c)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(-b) + sqrt(Float64(Float64(b * b) - Float64(Float64(4.0 * a) * c)))) / Float64(2.0 * a))
end
function tmp = code(a, b, c)
	tmp = (-b + sqrt(((b * b) - ((4.0 * a) * c)))) / (2.0 * a);
end
code[a_, b_, c_] := N[(N[((-b) + N[Sqrt[N[(N[(b * b), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(4.0 * a), $MachinePrecision] * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(2.0 * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\frac{\left(-b\right) + \sqrt{b \cdot b - \left(4 \cdot a\right) \cdot c}}{2 \cdot a}
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary64 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 9 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 55.4% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{\left(-b\right) + \sqrt{b \cdot b - \left(4 \cdot a\right) \cdot c}}{2 \cdot a} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (a b c)
 :precision binary64
 (/ (+ (- b) (sqrt (- (* b b) (* (* 4.0 a) c)))) (* 2.0 a)))
double code(double a, double b, double c) {
	return (-b + sqrt(((b * b) - ((4.0 * a) * c)))) / (2.0 * a);
}
real(8) function code(a, b, c)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: c
    code = (-b + sqrt(((b * b) - ((4.0d0 * a) * c)))) / (2.0d0 * a)
end function
public static double code(double a, double b, double c) {
	return (-b + Math.sqrt(((b * b) - ((4.0 * a) * c)))) / (2.0 * a);
}
def code(a, b, c):
	return (-b + math.sqrt(((b * b) - ((4.0 * a) * c)))) / (2.0 * a)
function code(a, b, c)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(-b) + sqrt(Float64(Float64(b * b) - Float64(Float64(4.0 * a) * c)))) / Float64(2.0 * a))
end
function tmp = code(a, b, c)
	tmp = (-b + sqrt(((b * b) - ((4.0 * a) * c)))) / (2.0 * a);
end
code[a_, b_, c_] := N[(N[((-b) + N[Sqrt[N[(N[(b * b), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(4.0 * a), $MachinePrecision] * c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(2.0 * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\frac{\left(-b\right) + \sqrt{b \cdot b - \left(4 \cdot a\right) \cdot c}}{2 \cdot a}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 91.4% accurate, 0.1× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq 2.1:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, b, c \cdot \left(a \cdot -4\right)\right)} - b}{a \cdot 2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \frac{{a}^{2} \cdot {c}^{3}}{{b}^{5}} + \left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \frac{16 \cdot \left({a}^{4} \cdot {c}^{4}\right) + \left(-1 + e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(4 \cdot {\left(c \cdot a\right)}^{4}\right)}\right)}{a \cdot {b}^{7}} - \frac{a \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}}\right) - \frac{c}{b}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (a b c)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= b 2.1)
   (/ (- (sqrt (fma b b (* c (* a -4.0)))) b) (* a 2.0))
   (+
    (* -2.0 (/ (* (pow a 2.0) (pow c 3.0)) (pow b 5.0)))
    (-
     (-
      (*
       -0.25
       (/
        (+
         (* 16.0 (* (pow a 4.0) (pow c 4.0)))
         (+ -1.0 (exp (log1p (* 4.0 (pow (* c a) 4.0))))))
        (* a (pow b 7.0))))
      (/ (* a (pow c 2.0)) (pow b 3.0)))
     (/ c b)))))
double code(double a, double b, double c) {
	double tmp;
	if (b <= 2.1) {
		tmp = (sqrt(fma(b, b, (c * (a * -4.0)))) - b) / (a * 2.0);
	} else {
		tmp = (-2.0 * ((pow(a, 2.0) * pow(c, 3.0)) / pow(b, 5.0))) + (((-0.25 * (((16.0 * (pow(a, 4.0) * pow(c, 4.0))) + (-1.0 + exp(log1p((4.0 * pow((c * a), 4.0)))))) / (a * pow(b, 7.0)))) - ((a * pow(c, 2.0)) / pow(b, 3.0))) - (c / b));
	}
	return tmp;
}
function code(a, b, c)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (b <= 2.1)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(sqrt(fma(b, b, Float64(c * Float64(a * -4.0)))) - b) / Float64(a * 2.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(-2.0 * Float64(Float64((a ^ 2.0) * (c ^ 3.0)) / (b ^ 5.0))) + Float64(Float64(Float64(-0.25 * Float64(Float64(Float64(16.0 * Float64((a ^ 4.0) * (c ^ 4.0))) + Float64(-1.0 + exp(log1p(Float64(4.0 * (Float64(c * a) ^ 4.0)))))) / Float64(a * (b ^ 7.0)))) - Float64(Float64(a * (c ^ 2.0)) / (b ^ 3.0))) - Float64(c / b)));
	end
	return tmp
end
code[a_, b_, c_] := If[LessEqual[b, 2.1], N[(N[(N[Sqrt[N[(b * b + N[(c * N[(a * -4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - b), $MachinePrecision] / N[(a * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(-2.0 * N[(N[(N[Power[a, 2.0], $MachinePrecision] * N[Power[c, 3.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[Power[b, 5.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(N[(-0.25 * N[(N[(N[(16.0 * N[(N[Power[a, 4.0], $MachinePrecision] * N[Power[c, 4.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(-1.0 + N[Exp[N[Log[1 + N[(4.0 * N[Power[N[(c * a), $MachinePrecision], 4.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(a * N[Power[b, 7.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(a * N[Power[c, 2.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[Power[b, 3.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(c / b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;b \leq 2.1:\\
\;\;\;\;\frac{\sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, b, c \cdot \left(a \cdot -4\right)\right)} - b}{a \cdot 2}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \frac{{a}^{2} \cdot {c}^{3}}{{b}^{5}} + \left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \frac{16 \cdot \left({a}^{4} \cdot {c}^{4}\right) + \left(-1 + e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(4 \cdot {\left(c \cdot a\right)}^{4}\right)}\right)}{a \cdot {b}^{7}} - \frac{a \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}}\right) - \frac{c}{b}\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if b < 2.10000000000000009

    1. Initial program 85.1%

      \[\frac{\left(-b\right) + \sqrt{b \cdot b - \left(4 \cdot a\right) \cdot c}}{2 \cdot a} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. Simplified85.5%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, b, c \cdot \left(a \cdot -4\right)\right)} - b}{a \cdot 2}} \]

      if 2.10000000000000009 < b

      1. Initial program 50.3%

        \[\frac{\left(-b\right) + \sqrt{b \cdot b - \left(4 \cdot a\right) \cdot c}}{2 \cdot a} \]
      2. Step-by-step derivation
        1. *-commutative50.3%

          \[\leadsto \frac{\left(-b\right) + \sqrt{b \cdot b - \left(4 \cdot a\right) \cdot c}}{\color{blue}{a \cdot 2}} \]
      3. Simplified50.3%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(-b\right) + \sqrt{b \cdot b - \left(4 \cdot a\right) \cdot c}}{a \cdot 2}} \]
      4. Taylor expanded in b around inf 94.4%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \frac{{a}^{2} \cdot {c}^{3}}{{b}^{5}} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{c}{b} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{a \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}} + -0.25 \cdot \frac{16 \cdot \left({a}^{4} \cdot {c}^{4}\right) + {\left(-2 \cdot \left({a}^{2} \cdot {c}^{2}\right)\right)}^{2}}{a \cdot {b}^{7}}\right)\right)} \]
      5. Step-by-step derivation
        1. expm1-log1p-u94.4%

          \[\leadsto -2 \cdot \frac{{a}^{2} \cdot {c}^{3}}{{b}^{5}} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{c}{b} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{a \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}} + -0.25 \cdot \frac{16 \cdot \left({a}^{4} \cdot {c}^{4}\right) + \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left({\left(-2 \cdot \left({a}^{2} \cdot {c}^{2}\right)\right)}^{2}\right)\right)}}{a \cdot {b}^{7}}\right)\right) \]
        2. expm1-udef94.4%

          \[\leadsto -2 \cdot \frac{{a}^{2} \cdot {c}^{3}}{{b}^{5}} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{c}{b} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{a \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}} + -0.25 \cdot \frac{16 \cdot \left({a}^{4} \cdot {c}^{4}\right) + \color{blue}{\left(e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left({\left(-2 \cdot \left({a}^{2} \cdot {c}^{2}\right)\right)}^{2}\right)} - 1\right)}}{a \cdot {b}^{7}}\right)\right) \]
        3. unpow-prod-down94.4%

          \[\leadsto -2 \cdot \frac{{a}^{2} \cdot {c}^{3}}{{b}^{5}} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{c}{b} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{a \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}} + -0.25 \cdot \frac{16 \cdot \left({a}^{4} \cdot {c}^{4}\right) + \left(e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{{-2}^{2} \cdot {\left({a}^{2} \cdot {c}^{2}\right)}^{2}}\right)} - 1\right)}{a \cdot {b}^{7}}\right)\right) \]
        4. metadata-eval94.4%

          \[\leadsto -2 \cdot \frac{{a}^{2} \cdot {c}^{3}}{{b}^{5}} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{c}{b} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{a \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}} + -0.25 \cdot \frac{16 \cdot \left({a}^{4} \cdot {c}^{4}\right) + \left(e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{4} \cdot {\left({a}^{2} \cdot {c}^{2}\right)}^{2}\right)} - 1\right)}{a \cdot {b}^{7}}\right)\right) \]
        5. pow-prod-down94.4%

          \[\leadsto -2 \cdot \frac{{a}^{2} \cdot {c}^{3}}{{b}^{5}} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{c}{b} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{a \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}} + -0.25 \cdot \frac{16 \cdot \left({a}^{4} \cdot {c}^{4}\right) + \left(e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(4 \cdot {\color{blue}{\left({\left(a \cdot c\right)}^{2}\right)}}^{2}\right)} - 1\right)}{a \cdot {b}^{7}}\right)\right) \]
        6. pow-pow94.4%

          \[\leadsto -2 \cdot \frac{{a}^{2} \cdot {c}^{3}}{{b}^{5}} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{c}{b} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{a \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}} + -0.25 \cdot \frac{16 \cdot \left({a}^{4} \cdot {c}^{4}\right) + \left(e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(4 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(a \cdot c\right)}^{\left(2 \cdot 2\right)}}\right)} - 1\right)}{a \cdot {b}^{7}}\right)\right) \]
        7. metadata-eval94.4%

          \[\leadsto -2 \cdot \frac{{a}^{2} \cdot {c}^{3}}{{b}^{5}} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{c}{b} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{a \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}} + -0.25 \cdot \frac{16 \cdot \left({a}^{4} \cdot {c}^{4}\right) + \left(e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(4 \cdot {\left(a \cdot c\right)}^{\color{blue}{4}}\right)} - 1\right)}{a \cdot {b}^{7}}\right)\right) \]
      6. Applied egg-rr94.4%

        \[\leadsto -2 \cdot \frac{{a}^{2} \cdot {c}^{3}}{{b}^{5}} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{c}{b} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{a \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}} + -0.25 \cdot \frac{16 \cdot \left({a}^{4} \cdot {c}^{4}\right) + \color{blue}{\left(e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(4 \cdot {\left(a \cdot c\right)}^{4}\right)} - 1\right)}}{a \cdot {b}^{7}}\right)\right) \]
    3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
    4. Final simplification93.0%

      \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq 2.1:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, b, c \cdot \left(a \cdot -4\right)\right)} - b}{a \cdot 2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \frac{{a}^{2} \cdot {c}^{3}}{{b}^{5}} + \left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \frac{16 \cdot \left({a}^{4} \cdot {c}^{4}\right) + \left(-1 + e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(4 \cdot {\left(c \cdot a\right)}^{4}\right)}\right)}{a \cdot {b}^{7}} - \frac{a \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}}\right) - \frac{c}{b}\right)\\ \end{array} \]

    Alternative 2: 91.4% accurate, 0.2× speedup?

    \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq 2.1:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, b, c \cdot \left(a \cdot -4\right)\right)} - b}{a \cdot 2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \frac{{a}^{2} \cdot {c}^{3}}{{b}^{5}} + \left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(\frac{{\left(c \cdot a\right)}^{4}}{{b}^{7}} \cdot \frac{20}{a}\right) - \frac{a \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}}\right) - \frac{c}{b}\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
    (FPCore (a b c)
     :precision binary64
     (if (<= b 2.1)
       (/ (- (sqrt (fma b b (* c (* a -4.0)))) b) (* a 2.0))
       (+
        (* -2.0 (/ (* (pow a 2.0) (pow c 3.0)) (pow b 5.0)))
        (-
         (-
          (* -0.25 (* (/ (pow (* c a) 4.0) (pow b 7.0)) (/ 20.0 a)))
          (/ (* a (pow c 2.0)) (pow b 3.0)))
         (/ c b)))))
    double code(double a, double b, double c) {
    	double tmp;
    	if (b <= 2.1) {
    		tmp = (sqrt(fma(b, b, (c * (a * -4.0)))) - b) / (a * 2.0);
    	} else {
    		tmp = (-2.0 * ((pow(a, 2.0) * pow(c, 3.0)) / pow(b, 5.0))) + (((-0.25 * ((pow((c * a), 4.0) / pow(b, 7.0)) * (20.0 / a))) - ((a * pow(c, 2.0)) / pow(b, 3.0))) - (c / b));
    	}
    	return tmp;
    }
    
    function code(a, b, c)
    	tmp = 0.0
    	if (b <= 2.1)
    		tmp = Float64(Float64(sqrt(fma(b, b, Float64(c * Float64(a * -4.0)))) - b) / Float64(a * 2.0));
    	else
    		tmp = Float64(Float64(-2.0 * Float64(Float64((a ^ 2.0) * (c ^ 3.0)) / (b ^ 5.0))) + Float64(Float64(Float64(-0.25 * Float64(Float64((Float64(c * a) ^ 4.0) / (b ^ 7.0)) * Float64(20.0 / a))) - Float64(Float64(a * (c ^ 2.0)) / (b ^ 3.0))) - Float64(c / b)));
    	end
    	return tmp
    end
    
    code[a_, b_, c_] := If[LessEqual[b, 2.1], N[(N[(N[Sqrt[N[(b * b + N[(c * N[(a * -4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - b), $MachinePrecision] / N[(a * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(-2.0 * N[(N[(N[Power[a, 2.0], $MachinePrecision] * N[Power[c, 3.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[Power[b, 5.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(N[(-0.25 * N[(N[(N[Power[N[(c * a), $MachinePrecision], 4.0], $MachinePrecision] / N[Power[b, 7.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(20.0 / a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(a * N[Power[c, 2.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[Power[b, 3.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(c / b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
    
    \begin{array}{l}
    
    \\
    \begin{array}{l}
    \mathbf{if}\;b \leq 2.1:\\
    \;\;\;\;\frac{\sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, b, c \cdot \left(a \cdot -4\right)\right)} - b}{a \cdot 2}\\
    
    \mathbf{else}:\\
    \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \frac{{a}^{2} \cdot {c}^{3}}{{b}^{5}} + \left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(\frac{{\left(c \cdot a\right)}^{4}}{{b}^{7}} \cdot \frac{20}{a}\right) - \frac{a \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}}\right) - \frac{c}{b}\right)\\
    
    
    \end{array}
    \end{array}
    
    Derivation
    1. Split input into 2 regimes
    2. if b < 2.10000000000000009

      1. Initial program 85.1%

        \[\frac{\left(-b\right) + \sqrt{b \cdot b - \left(4 \cdot a\right) \cdot c}}{2 \cdot a} \]
      2. Step-by-step derivation
        1. Simplified85.5%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, b, c \cdot \left(a \cdot -4\right)\right)} - b}{a \cdot 2}} \]

        if 2.10000000000000009 < b

        1. Initial program 50.3%

          \[\frac{\left(-b\right) + \sqrt{b \cdot b - \left(4 \cdot a\right) \cdot c}}{2 \cdot a} \]
        2. Step-by-step derivation
          1. *-commutative50.3%

            \[\leadsto \frac{\left(-b\right) + \sqrt{b \cdot b - \left(4 \cdot a\right) \cdot c}}{\color{blue}{a \cdot 2}} \]
        3. Simplified50.3%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(-b\right) + \sqrt{b \cdot b - \left(4 \cdot a\right) \cdot c}}{a \cdot 2}} \]
        4. Taylor expanded in b around inf 94.4%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \frac{{a}^{2} \cdot {c}^{3}}{{b}^{5}} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{c}{b} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{a \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}} + -0.25 \cdot \frac{16 \cdot \left({a}^{4} \cdot {c}^{4}\right) + {\left(-2 \cdot \left({a}^{2} \cdot {c}^{2}\right)\right)}^{2}}{a \cdot {b}^{7}}\right)\right)} \]
        5. Step-by-step derivation
          1. *-commutative94.4%

            \[\leadsto -2 \cdot \frac{{a}^{2} \cdot {c}^{3}}{{b}^{5}} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{c}{b} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{a \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}} + -0.25 \cdot \frac{16 \cdot \left({a}^{4} \cdot {c}^{4}\right) + {\color{blue}{\left(\left({a}^{2} \cdot {c}^{2}\right) \cdot -2\right)}}^{2}}{a \cdot {b}^{7}}\right)\right) \]
          2. unpow-prod-down94.4%

            \[\leadsto -2 \cdot \frac{{a}^{2} \cdot {c}^{3}}{{b}^{5}} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{c}{b} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{a \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}} + -0.25 \cdot \frac{16 \cdot \left({a}^{4} \cdot {c}^{4}\right) + \color{blue}{{\left({a}^{2} \cdot {c}^{2}\right)}^{2} \cdot {-2}^{2}}}{a \cdot {b}^{7}}\right)\right) \]
          3. pow-prod-down94.4%

            \[\leadsto -2 \cdot \frac{{a}^{2} \cdot {c}^{3}}{{b}^{5}} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{c}{b} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{a \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}} + -0.25 \cdot \frac{16 \cdot \left({a}^{4} \cdot {c}^{4}\right) + {\color{blue}{\left({\left(a \cdot c\right)}^{2}\right)}}^{2} \cdot {-2}^{2}}{a \cdot {b}^{7}}\right)\right) \]
          4. pow-pow94.4%

            \[\leadsto -2 \cdot \frac{{a}^{2} \cdot {c}^{3}}{{b}^{5}} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{c}{b} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{a \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}} + -0.25 \cdot \frac{16 \cdot \left({a}^{4} \cdot {c}^{4}\right) + \color{blue}{{\left(a \cdot c\right)}^{\left(2 \cdot 2\right)}} \cdot {-2}^{2}}{a \cdot {b}^{7}}\right)\right) \]
          5. metadata-eval94.4%

            \[\leadsto -2 \cdot \frac{{a}^{2} \cdot {c}^{3}}{{b}^{5}} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{c}{b} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{a \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}} + -0.25 \cdot \frac{16 \cdot \left({a}^{4} \cdot {c}^{4}\right) + {\left(a \cdot c\right)}^{\color{blue}{4}} \cdot {-2}^{2}}{a \cdot {b}^{7}}\right)\right) \]
          6. metadata-eval94.4%

            \[\leadsto -2 \cdot \frac{{a}^{2} \cdot {c}^{3}}{{b}^{5}} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{c}{b} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{a \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}} + -0.25 \cdot \frac{16 \cdot \left({a}^{4} \cdot {c}^{4}\right) + {\left(a \cdot c\right)}^{4} \cdot \color{blue}{4}}{a \cdot {b}^{7}}\right)\right) \]
        6. Applied egg-rr94.4%

          \[\leadsto -2 \cdot \frac{{a}^{2} \cdot {c}^{3}}{{b}^{5}} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{c}{b} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{a \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}} + -0.25 \cdot \frac{16 \cdot \left({a}^{4} \cdot {c}^{4}\right) + \color{blue}{{\left(a \cdot c\right)}^{4} \cdot 4}}{a \cdot {b}^{7}}\right)\right) \]
        7. Step-by-step derivation
          1. expm1-log1p-u94.4%

            \[\leadsto -2 \cdot \frac{{a}^{2} \cdot {c}^{3}}{{b}^{5}} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{c}{b} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{a \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}} + -0.25 \cdot \frac{16 \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left({a}^{4} \cdot {c}^{4}\right)\right)} + {\left(a \cdot c\right)}^{4} \cdot 4}{a \cdot {b}^{7}}\right)\right) \]
          2. expm1-udef94.4%

            \[\leadsto -2 \cdot \frac{{a}^{2} \cdot {c}^{3}}{{b}^{5}} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{c}{b} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{a \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}} + -0.25 \cdot \frac{16 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left({a}^{4} \cdot {c}^{4}\right)} - 1\right)} + {\left(a \cdot c\right)}^{4} \cdot 4}{a \cdot {b}^{7}}\right)\right) \]
          3. pow-prod-down94.4%

            \[\leadsto -2 \cdot \frac{{a}^{2} \cdot {c}^{3}}{{b}^{5}} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{c}{b} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{a \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}} + -0.25 \cdot \frac{16 \cdot \left(e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{{\left(a \cdot c\right)}^{4}}\right)} - 1\right) + {\left(a \cdot c\right)}^{4} \cdot 4}{a \cdot {b}^{7}}\right)\right) \]
        8. Applied egg-rr94.4%

          \[\leadsto -2 \cdot \frac{{a}^{2} \cdot {c}^{3}}{{b}^{5}} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{c}{b} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{a \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}} + -0.25 \cdot \frac{16 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left({\left(a \cdot c\right)}^{4}\right)} - 1\right)} + {\left(a \cdot c\right)}^{4} \cdot 4}{a \cdot {b}^{7}}\right)\right) \]
        9. Step-by-step derivation
          1. expm1-def94.4%

            \[\leadsto -2 \cdot \frac{{a}^{2} \cdot {c}^{3}}{{b}^{5}} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{c}{b} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{a \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}} + -0.25 \cdot \frac{16 \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left({\left(a \cdot c\right)}^{4}\right)\right)} + {\left(a \cdot c\right)}^{4} \cdot 4}{a \cdot {b}^{7}}\right)\right) \]
          2. expm1-log1p94.4%

            \[\leadsto -2 \cdot \frac{{a}^{2} \cdot {c}^{3}}{{b}^{5}} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{c}{b} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{a \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}} + -0.25 \cdot \frac{16 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(a \cdot c\right)}^{4}} + {\left(a \cdot c\right)}^{4} \cdot 4}{a \cdot {b}^{7}}\right)\right) \]
        10. Simplified94.4%

          \[\leadsto -2 \cdot \frac{{a}^{2} \cdot {c}^{3}}{{b}^{5}} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{c}{b} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{a \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}} + -0.25 \cdot \frac{16 \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(a \cdot c\right)}^{4}} + {\left(a \cdot c\right)}^{4} \cdot 4}{a \cdot {b}^{7}}\right)\right) \]
        11. Taylor expanded in c around 0 94.4%

          \[\leadsto -2 \cdot \frac{{a}^{2} \cdot {c}^{3}}{{b}^{5}} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{c}{b} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{a \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}} + -0.25 \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{{c}^{4} \cdot \left(4 \cdot {a}^{4} + 16 \cdot {a}^{4}\right)}{a \cdot {b}^{7}}}\right)\right) \]
        12. Step-by-step derivation
          1. distribute-rgt-out94.4%

            \[\leadsto -2 \cdot \frac{{a}^{2} \cdot {c}^{3}}{{b}^{5}} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{c}{b} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{a \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}} + -0.25 \cdot \frac{{c}^{4} \cdot \color{blue}{\left({a}^{4} \cdot \left(4 + 16\right)\right)}}{a \cdot {b}^{7}}\right)\right) \]
          2. metadata-eval94.4%

            \[\leadsto -2 \cdot \frac{{a}^{2} \cdot {c}^{3}}{{b}^{5}} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{c}{b} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{a \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}} + -0.25 \cdot \frac{{c}^{4} \cdot \left({a}^{4} \cdot \color{blue}{20}\right)}{a \cdot {b}^{7}}\right)\right) \]
          3. associate-*r*94.4%

            \[\leadsto -2 \cdot \frac{{a}^{2} \cdot {c}^{3}}{{b}^{5}} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{c}{b} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{a \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}} + -0.25 \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\left({c}^{4} \cdot {a}^{4}\right) \cdot 20}}{a \cdot {b}^{7}}\right)\right) \]
          4. *-commutative94.4%

            \[\leadsto -2 \cdot \frac{{a}^{2} \cdot {c}^{3}}{{b}^{5}} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{c}{b} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{a \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}} + -0.25 \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\left({a}^{4} \cdot {c}^{4}\right)} \cdot 20}{a \cdot {b}^{7}}\right)\right) \]
          5. *-commutative94.4%

            \[\leadsto -2 \cdot \frac{{a}^{2} \cdot {c}^{3}}{{b}^{5}} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{c}{b} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{a \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}} + -0.25 \cdot \frac{\left({a}^{4} \cdot {c}^{4}\right) \cdot 20}{\color{blue}{{b}^{7} \cdot a}}\right)\right) \]
          6. times-frac94.4%

            \[\leadsto -2 \cdot \frac{{a}^{2} \cdot {c}^{3}}{{b}^{5}} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{c}{b} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{a \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}} + -0.25 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{{a}^{4} \cdot {c}^{4}}{{b}^{7}} \cdot \frac{20}{a}\right)}\right)\right) \]
        13. Simplified94.4%

          \[\leadsto -2 \cdot \frac{{a}^{2} \cdot {c}^{3}}{{b}^{5}} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{c}{b} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{a \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}} + -0.25 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{{\left(a \cdot c\right)}^{4}}{{b}^{7}} \cdot \frac{20}{a}\right)}\right)\right) \]
      3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
      4. Final simplification93.0%

        \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq 2.1:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, b, c \cdot \left(a \cdot -4\right)\right)} - b}{a \cdot 2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-2 \cdot \frac{{a}^{2} \cdot {c}^{3}}{{b}^{5}} + \left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(\frac{{\left(c \cdot a\right)}^{4}}{{b}^{7}} \cdot \frac{20}{a}\right) - \frac{a \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}}\right) - \frac{c}{b}\right)\\ \end{array} \]

      Alternative 3: 89.4% accurate, 0.2× speedup?

      \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq 2.5:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, b, c \cdot \left(a \cdot -4\right)\right)} - b}{a \cdot 2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(\frac{-2 \cdot \left({a}^{2} \cdot {c}^{3}\right)}{{b}^{5}} - \frac{c}{b}\right) - \frac{a}{\frac{{b}^{3}}{{c}^{2}}}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
      (FPCore (a b c)
       :precision binary64
       (if (<= b 2.5)
         (/ (- (sqrt (fma b b (* c (* a -4.0)))) b) (* a 2.0))
         (-
          (- (/ (* -2.0 (* (pow a 2.0) (pow c 3.0))) (pow b 5.0)) (/ c b))
          (/ a (/ (pow b 3.0) (pow c 2.0))))))
      double code(double a, double b, double c) {
      	double tmp;
      	if (b <= 2.5) {
      		tmp = (sqrt(fma(b, b, (c * (a * -4.0)))) - b) / (a * 2.0);
      	} else {
      		tmp = (((-2.0 * (pow(a, 2.0) * pow(c, 3.0))) / pow(b, 5.0)) - (c / b)) - (a / (pow(b, 3.0) / pow(c, 2.0)));
      	}
      	return tmp;
      }
      
      function code(a, b, c)
      	tmp = 0.0
      	if (b <= 2.5)
      		tmp = Float64(Float64(sqrt(fma(b, b, Float64(c * Float64(a * -4.0)))) - b) / Float64(a * 2.0));
      	else
      		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(-2.0 * Float64((a ^ 2.0) * (c ^ 3.0))) / (b ^ 5.0)) - Float64(c / b)) - Float64(a / Float64((b ^ 3.0) / (c ^ 2.0))));
      	end
      	return tmp
      end
      
      code[a_, b_, c_] := If[LessEqual[b, 2.5], N[(N[(N[Sqrt[N[(b * b + N[(c * N[(a * -4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - b), $MachinePrecision] / N[(a * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(N[(N[(-2.0 * N[(N[Power[a, 2.0], $MachinePrecision] * N[Power[c, 3.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[Power[b, 5.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(c / b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(a / N[(N[Power[b, 3.0], $MachinePrecision] / N[Power[c, 2.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
      
      \begin{array}{l}
      
      \\
      \begin{array}{l}
      \mathbf{if}\;b \leq 2.5:\\
      \;\;\;\;\frac{\sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, b, c \cdot \left(a \cdot -4\right)\right)} - b}{a \cdot 2}\\
      
      \mathbf{else}:\\
      \;\;\;\;\left(\frac{-2 \cdot \left({a}^{2} \cdot {c}^{3}\right)}{{b}^{5}} - \frac{c}{b}\right) - \frac{a}{\frac{{b}^{3}}{{c}^{2}}}\\
      
      
      \end{array}
      \end{array}
      
      Derivation
      1. Split input into 2 regimes
      2. if b < 2.5

        1. Initial program 85.1%

          \[\frac{\left(-b\right) + \sqrt{b \cdot b - \left(4 \cdot a\right) \cdot c}}{2 \cdot a} \]
        2. Step-by-step derivation
          1. Simplified85.5%

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, b, c \cdot \left(a \cdot -4\right)\right)} - b}{a \cdot 2}} \]

          if 2.5 < b

          1. Initial program 50.3%

            \[\frac{\left(-b\right) + \sqrt{b \cdot b - \left(4 \cdot a\right) \cdot c}}{2 \cdot a} \]
          2. Step-by-step derivation
            1. *-commutative50.3%

              \[\leadsto \frac{\left(-b\right) + \sqrt{b \cdot b - \left(4 \cdot a\right) \cdot c}}{\color{blue}{a \cdot 2}} \]
          3. Simplified50.3%

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(-b\right) + \sqrt{b \cdot b - \left(4 \cdot a\right) \cdot c}}{a \cdot 2}} \]
          4. Taylor expanded in b around inf 92.1%

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \frac{{a}^{2} \cdot {c}^{3}}{{b}^{5}} + \left(-1 \cdot \frac{c}{b} + -1 \cdot \frac{a \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}}\right)} \]
          5. Step-by-step derivation
            1. associate-+r+92.1%

              \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-2 \cdot \frac{{a}^{2} \cdot {c}^{3}}{{b}^{5}} + -1 \cdot \frac{c}{b}\right) + -1 \cdot \frac{a \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}}} \]
            2. mul-1-neg92.1%

              \[\leadsto \left(-2 \cdot \frac{{a}^{2} \cdot {c}^{3}}{{b}^{5}} + -1 \cdot \frac{c}{b}\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{a \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}}\right)} \]
            3. unsub-neg92.1%

              \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-2 \cdot \frac{{a}^{2} \cdot {c}^{3}}{{b}^{5}} + -1 \cdot \frac{c}{b}\right) - \frac{a \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}}} \]
            4. mul-1-neg92.1%

              \[\leadsto \left(-2 \cdot \frac{{a}^{2} \cdot {c}^{3}}{{b}^{5}} + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{c}{b}\right)}\right) - \frac{a \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}} \]
            5. unsub-neg92.1%

              \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-2 \cdot \frac{{a}^{2} \cdot {c}^{3}}{{b}^{5}} - \frac{c}{b}\right)} - \frac{a \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}} \]
            6. associate-*r/92.1%

              \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\frac{-2 \cdot \left({a}^{2} \cdot {c}^{3}\right)}{{b}^{5}}} - \frac{c}{b}\right) - \frac{a \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}} \]
            7. *-commutative92.1%

              \[\leadsto \left(\frac{-2 \cdot \color{blue}{\left({c}^{3} \cdot {a}^{2}\right)}}{{b}^{5}} - \frac{c}{b}\right) - \frac{a \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}} \]
            8. associate-/l*92.1%

              \[\leadsto \left(\frac{-2 \cdot \left({c}^{3} \cdot {a}^{2}\right)}{{b}^{5}} - \frac{c}{b}\right) - \color{blue}{\frac{a}{\frac{{b}^{3}}{{c}^{2}}}} \]
          6. Simplified92.1%

            \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{-2 \cdot \left({c}^{3} \cdot {a}^{2}\right)}{{b}^{5}} - \frac{c}{b}\right) - \frac{a}{\frac{{b}^{3}}{{c}^{2}}}} \]
        3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
        4. Final simplification91.0%

          \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq 2.5:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, b, c \cdot \left(a \cdot -4\right)\right)} - b}{a \cdot 2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(\frac{-2 \cdot \left({a}^{2} \cdot {c}^{3}\right)}{{b}^{5}} - \frac{c}{b}\right) - \frac{a}{\frac{{b}^{3}}{{c}^{2}}}\\ \end{array} \]

        Alternative 4: 89.2% accurate, 0.3× speedup?

        \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq 2.1:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, b, c \cdot \left(a \cdot -4\right)\right)} - b}{a \cdot 2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(-4, \frac{{\left(c \cdot a\right)}^{3}}{{b}^{5}}, -2 \cdot \left(\frac{a}{\frac{b}{c}} + \frac{1}{b} \cdot {\left(\frac{c \cdot a}{b}\right)}^{2}\right)\right)}{a \cdot 2}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
        (FPCore (a b c)
         :precision binary64
         (if (<= b 2.1)
           (/ (- (sqrt (fma b b (* c (* a -4.0)))) b) (* a 2.0))
           (/
            (fma
             -4.0
             (/ (pow (* c a) 3.0) (pow b 5.0))
             (* -2.0 (+ (/ a (/ b c)) (* (/ 1.0 b) (pow (/ (* c a) b) 2.0)))))
            (* a 2.0))))
        double code(double a, double b, double c) {
        	double tmp;
        	if (b <= 2.1) {
        		tmp = (sqrt(fma(b, b, (c * (a * -4.0)))) - b) / (a * 2.0);
        	} else {
        		tmp = fma(-4.0, (pow((c * a), 3.0) / pow(b, 5.0)), (-2.0 * ((a / (b / c)) + ((1.0 / b) * pow(((c * a) / b), 2.0))))) / (a * 2.0);
        	}
        	return tmp;
        }
        
        function code(a, b, c)
        	tmp = 0.0
        	if (b <= 2.1)
        		tmp = Float64(Float64(sqrt(fma(b, b, Float64(c * Float64(a * -4.0)))) - b) / Float64(a * 2.0));
        	else
        		tmp = Float64(fma(-4.0, Float64((Float64(c * a) ^ 3.0) / (b ^ 5.0)), Float64(-2.0 * Float64(Float64(a / Float64(b / c)) + Float64(Float64(1.0 / b) * (Float64(Float64(c * a) / b) ^ 2.0))))) / Float64(a * 2.0));
        	end
        	return tmp
        end
        
        code[a_, b_, c_] := If[LessEqual[b, 2.1], N[(N[(N[Sqrt[N[(b * b + N[(c * N[(a * -4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - b), $MachinePrecision] / N[(a * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(-4.0 * N[(N[Power[N[(c * a), $MachinePrecision], 3.0], $MachinePrecision] / N[Power[b, 5.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(-2.0 * N[(N[(a / N[(b / c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(1.0 / b), $MachinePrecision] * N[Power[N[(N[(c * a), $MachinePrecision] / b), $MachinePrecision], 2.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(a * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
        
        \begin{array}{l}
        
        \\
        \begin{array}{l}
        \mathbf{if}\;b \leq 2.1:\\
        \;\;\;\;\frac{\sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, b, c \cdot \left(a \cdot -4\right)\right)} - b}{a \cdot 2}\\
        
        \mathbf{else}:\\
        \;\;\;\;\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(-4, \frac{{\left(c \cdot a\right)}^{3}}{{b}^{5}}, -2 \cdot \left(\frac{a}{\frac{b}{c}} + \frac{1}{b} \cdot {\left(\frac{c \cdot a}{b}\right)}^{2}\right)\right)}{a \cdot 2}\\
        
        
        \end{array}
        \end{array}
        
        Derivation
        1. Split input into 2 regimes
        2. if b < 2.10000000000000009

          1. Initial program 85.1%

            \[\frac{\left(-b\right) + \sqrt{b \cdot b - \left(4 \cdot a\right) \cdot c}}{2 \cdot a} \]
          2. Step-by-step derivation
            1. Simplified85.5%

              \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, b, c \cdot \left(a \cdot -4\right)\right)} - b}{a \cdot 2}} \]

            if 2.10000000000000009 < b

            1. Initial program 50.3%

              \[\frac{\left(-b\right) + \sqrt{b \cdot b - \left(4 \cdot a\right) \cdot c}}{2 \cdot a} \]
            2. Step-by-step derivation
              1. *-commutative50.3%

                \[\leadsto \frac{\left(-b\right) + \sqrt{b \cdot b - \left(4 \cdot a\right) \cdot c}}{\color{blue}{a \cdot 2}} \]
            3. Simplified50.3%

              \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(-b\right) + \sqrt{b \cdot b - \left(4 \cdot a\right) \cdot c}}{a \cdot 2}} \]
            4. Taylor expanded in b around inf 91.9%

              \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{-4 \cdot \frac{{a}^{3} \cdot {c}^{3}}{{b}^{5}} + \left(-2 \cdot \frac{a \cdot c}{b} + -2 \cdot \frac{{a}^{2} \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}}\right)}}{a \cdot 2} \]
            5. Step-by-step derivation
              1. fma-def91.9%

                \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(-4, \frac{{a}^{3} \cdot {c}^{3}}{{b}^{5}}, -2 \cdot \frac{a \cdot c}{b} + -2 \cdot \frac{{a}^{2} \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}}\right)}}{a \cdot 2} \]
              2. cube-prod91.9%

                \[\leadsto \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(-4, \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(a \cdot c\right)}^{3}}}{{b}^{5}}, -2 \cdot \frac{a \cdot c}{b} + -2 \cdot \frac{{a}^{2} \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}}\right)}{a \cdot 2} \]
              3. distribute-lft-out91.9%

                \[\leadsto \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(-4, \frac{{\left(a \cdot c\right)}^{3}}{{b}^{5}}, \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \left(\frac{a \cdot c}{b} + \frac{{a}^{2} \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}}\right)}\right)}{a \cdot 2} \]
              4. associate-/l*91.9%

                \[\leadsto \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(-4, \frac{{\left(a \cdot c\right)}^{3}}{{b}^{5}}, -2 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{a}{\frac{b}{c}}} + \frac{{a}^{2} \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}}\right)\right)}{a \cdot 2} \]
            6. Simplified91.9%

              \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(-4, \frac{{\left(a \cdot c\right)}^{3}}{{b}^{5}}, -2 \cdot \left(\frac{a}{\frac{b}{c}} + \frac{{a}^{2} \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}}\right)\right)}}{a \cdot 2} \]
            7. Step-by-step derivation
              1. *-un-lft-identity91.9%

                \[\leadsto \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(-4, \frac{{\left(a \cdot c\right)}^{3}}{{b}^{5}}, -2 \cdot \left(\frac{a}{\frac{b}{c}} + \frac{\color{blue}{1 \cdot \left({a}^{2} \cdot {c}^{2}\right)}}{{b}^{3}}\right)\right)}{a \cdot 2} \]
              2. cube-mult91.9%

                \[\leadsto \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(-4, \frac{{\left(a \cdot c\right)}^{3}}{{b}^{5}}, -2 \cdot \left(\frac{a}{\frac{b}{c}} + \frac{1 \cdot \left({a}^{2} \cdot {c}^{2}\right)}{\color{blue}{b \cdot \left(b \cdot b\right)}}\right)\right)}{a \cdot 2} \]
              3. times-frac91.9%

                \[\leadsto \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(-4, \frac{{\left(a \cdot c\right)}^{3}}{{b}^{5}}, -2 \cdot \left(\frac{a}{\frac{b}{c}} + \color{blue}{\frac{1}{b} \cdot \frac{{a}^{2} \cdot {c}^{2}}{b \cdot b}}\right)\right)}{a \cdot 2} \]
              4. pow-prod-down91.9%

                \[\leadsto \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(-4, \frac{{\left(a \cdot c\right)}^{3}}{{b}^{5}}, -2 \cdot \left(\frac{a}{\frac{b}{c}} + \frac{1}{b} \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(a \cdot c\right)}^{2}}}{b \cdot b}\right)\right)}{a \cdot 2} \]
              5. pow291.9%

                \[\leadsto \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(-4, \frac{{\left(a \cdot c\right)}^{3}}{{b}^{5}}, -2 \cdot \left(\frac{a}{\frac{b}{c}} + \frac{1}{b} \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\left(a \cdot c\right) \cdot \left(a \cdot c\right)}}{b \cdot b}\right)\right)}{a \cdot 2} \]
              6. frac-times91.9%

                \[\leadsto \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(-4, \frac{{\left(a \cdot c\right)}^{3}}{{b}^{5}}, -2 \cdot \left(\frac{a}{\frac{b}{c}} + \frac{1}{b} \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{a \cdot c}{b} \cdot \frac{a \cdot c}{b}\right)}\right)\right)}{a \cdot 2} \]
              7. pow291.9%

                \[\leadsto \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(-4, \frac{{\left(a \cdot c\right)}^{3}}{{b}^{5}}, -2 \cdot \left(\frac{a}{\frac{b}{c}} + \frac{1}{b} \cdot \color{blue}{{\left(\frac{a \cdot c}{b}\right)}^{2}}\right)\right)}{a \cdot 2} \]
            8. Applied egg-rr91.9%

              \[\leadsto \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(-4, \frac{{\left(a \cdot c\right)}^{3}}{{b}^{5}}, -2 \cdot \left(\frac{a}{\frac{b}{c}} + \color{blue}{\frac{1}{b} \cdot {\left(\frac{a \cdot c}{b}\right)}^{2}}\right)\right)}{a \cdot 2} \]
          3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
          4. Final simplification90.9%

            \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq 2.1:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, b, c \cdot \left(a \cdot -4\right)\right)} - b}{a \cdot 2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(-4, \frac{{\left(c \cdot a\right)}^{3}}{{b}^{5}}, -2 \cdot \left(\frac{a}{\frac{b}{c}} + \frac{1}{b} \cdot {\left(\frac{c \cdot a}{b}\right)}^{2}\right)\right)}{a \cdot 2}\\ \end{array} \]

          Alternative 5: 85.1% accurate, 0.5× speedup?

          \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq 2.4:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, b, c \cdot \left(a \cdot -4\right)\right)} - b}{a \cdot 2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{-c}{b} - \frac{a}{\frac{1}{c} \cdot \frac{{b}^{3}}{c}}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
          (FPCore (a b c)
           :precision binary64
           (if (<= b 2.4)
             (/ (- (sqrt (fma b b (* c (* a -4.0)))) b) (* a 2.0))
             (- (/ (- c) b) (/ a (* (/ 1.0 c) (/ (pow b 3.0) c))))))
          double code(double a, double b, double c) {
          	double tmp;
          	if (b <= 2.4) {
          		tmp = (sqrt(fma(b, b, (c * (a * -4.0)))) - b) / (a * 2.0);
          	} else {
          		tmp = (-c / b) - (a / ((1.0 / c) * (pow(b, 3.0) / c)));
          	}
          	return tmp;
          }
          
          function code(a, b, c)
          	tmp = 0.0
          	if (b <= 2.4)
          		tmp = Float64(Float64(sqrt(fma(b, b, Float64(c * Float64(a * -4.0)))) - b) / Float64(a * 2.0));
          	else
          		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(-c) / b) - Float64(a / Float64(Float64(1.0 / c) * Float64((b ^ 3.0) / c))));
          	end
          	return tmp
          end
          
          code[a_, b_, c_] := If[LessEqual[b, 2.4], N[(N[(N[Sqrt[N[(b * b + N[(c * N[(a * -4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - b), $MachinePrecision] / N[(a * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[((-c) / b), $MachinePrecision] - N[(a / N[(N[(1.0 / c), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Power[b, 3.0], $MachinePrecision] / c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
          
          \begin{array}{l}
          
          \\
          \begin{array}{l}
          \mathbf{if}\;b \leq 2.4:\\
          \;\;\;\;\frac{\sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, b, c \cdot \left(a \cdot -4\right)\right)} - b}{a \cdot 2}\\
          
          \mathbf{else}:\\
          \;\;\;\;\frac{-c}{b} - \frac{a}{\frac{1}{c} \cdot \frac{{b}^{3}}{c}}\\
          
          
          \end{array}
          \end{array}
          
          Derivation
          1. Split input into 2 regimes
          2. if b < 2.39999999999999991

            1. Initial program 85.1%

              \[\frac{\left(-b\right) + \sqrt{b \cdot b - \left(4 \cdot a\right) \cdot c}}{2 \cdot a} \]
            2. Step-by-step derivation
              1. Simplified85.5%

                \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, b, c \cdot \left(a \cdot -4\right)\right)} - b}{a \cdot 2}} \]

              if 2.39999999999999991 < b

              1. Initial program 50.3%

                \[\frac{\left(-b\right) + \sqrt{b \cdot b - \left(4 \cdot a\right) \cdot c}}{2 \cdot a} \]
              2. Step-by-step derivation
                1. *-commutative50.3%

                  \[\leadsto \frac{\left(-b\right) + \sqrt{b \cdot b - \left(4 \cdot a\right) \cdot c}}{\color{blue}{a \cdot 2}} \]
              3. Simplified50.3%

                \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(-b\right) + \sqrt{b \cdot b - \left(4 \cdot a\right) \cdot c}}{a \cdot 2}} \]
              4. Taylor expanded in b around inf 87.1%

                \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{c}{b} + -1 \cdot \frac{a \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}}} \]
              5. Step-by-step derivation
                1. mul-1-neg87.1%

                  \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \frac{c}{b} + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{a \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}}\right)} \]
                2. unsub-neg87.1%

                  \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{c}{b} - \frac{a \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}}} \]
                3. mul-1-neg87.1%

                  \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{c}{b}\right)} - \frac{a \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}} \]
                4. distribute-neg-frac87.1%

                  \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-c}{b}} - \frac{a \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}} \]
                5. associate-/l*87.1%

                  \[\leadsto \frac{-c}{b} - \color{blue}{\frac{a}{\frac{{b}^{3}}{{c}^{2}}}} \]
              6. Simplified87.1%

                \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-c}{b} - \frac{a}{\frac{{b}^{3}}{{c}^{2}}}} \]
              7. Step-by-step derivation
                1. *-un-lft-identity87.1%

                  \[\leadsto \frac{-c}{b} - \frac{a}{\frac{\color{blue}{1 \cdot {b}^{3}}}{{c}^{2}}} \]
                2. unpow287.1%

                  \[\leadsto \frac{-c}{b} - \frac{a}{\frac{1 \cdot {b}^{3}}{\color{blue}{c \cdot c}}} \]
                3. times-frac87.1%

                  \[\leadsto \frac{-c}{b} - \frac{a}{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{c} \cdot \frac{{b}^{3}}{c}}} \]
              8. Applied egg-rr87.1%

                \[\leadsto \frac{-c}{b} - \frac{a}{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{c} \cdot \frac{{b}^{3}}{c}}} \]
            3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
            4. Final simplification86.9%

              \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq 2.4:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\sqrt{\mathsf{fma}\left(b, b, c \cdot \left(a \cdot -4\right)\right)} - b}{a \cdot 2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{-c}{b} - \frac{a}{\frac{1}{c} \cdot \frac{{b}^{3}}{c}}\\ \end{array} \]

            Alternative 6: 85.1% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

            \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq 2.4:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\sqrt{b \cdot b - c \cdot \left(a \cdot 4\right)} - b}{a \cdot 2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{-c}{b} - \frac{a}{\frac{1}{c} \cdot \frac{{b}^{3}}{c}}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
            (FPCore (a b c)
             :precision binary64
             (if (<= b 2.4)
               (/ (- (sqrt (- (* b b) (* c (* a 4.0)))) b) (* a 2.0))
               (- (/ (- c) b) (/ a (* (/ 1.0 c) (/ (pow b 3.0) c))))))
            double code(double a, double b, double c) {
            	double tmp;
            	if (b <= 2.4) {
            		tmp = (sqrt(((b * b) - (c * (a * 4.0)))) - b) / (a * 2.0);
            	} else {
            		tmp = (-c / b) - (a / ((1.0 / c) * (pow(b, 3.0) / c)));
            	}
            	return tmp;
            }
            
            real(8) function code(a, b, c)
                real(8), intent (in) :: a
                real(8), intent (in) :: b
                real(8), intent (in) :: c
                real(8) :: tmp
                if (b <= 2.4d0) then
                    tmp = (sqrt(((b * b) - (c * (a * 4.0d0)))) - b) / (a * 2.0d0)
                else
                    tmp = (-c / b) - (a / ((1.0d0 / c) * ((b ** 3.0d0) / c)))
                end if
                code = tmp
            end function
            
            public static double code(double a, double b, double c) {
            	double tmp;
            	if (b <= 2.4) {
            		tmp = (Math.sqrt(((b * b) - (c * (a * 4.0)))) - b) / (a * 2.0);
            	} else {
            		tmp = (-c / b) - (a / ((1.0 / c) * (Math.pow(b, 3.0) / c)));
            	}
            	return tmp;
            }
            
            def code(a, b, c):
            	tmp = 0
            	if b <= 2.4:
            		tmp = (math.sqrt(((b * b) - (c * (a * 4.0)))) - b) / (a * 2.0)
            	else:
            		tmp = (-c / b) - (a / ((1.0 / c) * (math.pow(b, 3.0) / c)))
            	return tmp
            
            function code(a, b, c)
            	tmp = 0.0
            	if (b <= 2.4)
            		tmp = Float64(Float64(sqrt(Float64(Float64(b * b) - Float64(c * Float64(a * 4.0)))) - b) / Float64(a * 2.0));
            	else
            		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(-c) / b) - Float64(a / Float64(Float64(1.0 / c) * Float64((b ^ 3.0) / c))));
            	end
            	return tmp
            end
            
            function tmp_2 = code(a, b, c)
            	tmp = 0.0;
            	if (b <= 2.4)
            		tmp = (sqrt(((b * b) - (c * (a * 4.0)))) - b) / (a * 2.0);
            	else
            		tmp = (-c / b) - (a / ((1.0 / c) * ((b ^ 3.0) / c)));
            	end
            	tmp_2 = tmp;
            end
            
            code[a_, b_, c_] := If[LessEqual[b, 2.4], N[(N[(N[Sqrt[N[(N[(b * b), $MachinePrecision] - N[(c * N[(a * 4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - b), $MachinePrecision] / N[(a * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[((-c) / b), $MachinePrecision] - N[(a / N[(N[(1.0 / c), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Power[b, 3.0], $MachinePrecision] / c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]
            
            \begin{array}{l}
            
            \\
            \begin{array}{l}
            \mathbf{if}\;b \leq 2.4:\\
            \;\;\;\;\frac{\sqrt{b \cdot b - c \cdot \left(a \cdot 4\right)} - b}{a \cdot 2}\\
            
            \mathbf{else}:\\
            \;\;\;\;\frac{-c}{b} - \frac{a}{\frac{1}{c} \cdot \frac{{b}^{3}}{c}}\\
            
            
            \end{array}
            \end{array}
            
            Derivation
            1. Split input into 2 regimes
            2. if b < 2.39999999999999991

              1. Initial program 85.1%

                \[\frac{\left(-b\right) + \sqrt{b \cdot b - \left(4 \cdot a\right) \cdot c}}{2 \cdot a} \]

              if 2.39999999999999991 < b

              1. Initial program 50.3%

                \[\frac{\left(-b\right) + \sqrt{b \cdot b - \left(4 \cdot a\right) \cdot c}}{2 \cdot a} \]
              2. Step-by-step derivation
                1. *-commutative50.3%

                  \[\leadsto \frac{\left(-b\right) + \sqrt{b \cdot b - \left(4 \cdot a\right) \cdot c}}{\color{blue}{a \cdot 2}} \]
              3. Simplified50.3%

                \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(-b\right) + \sqrt{b \cdot b - \left(4 \cdot a\right) \cdot c}}{a \cdot 2}} \]
              4. Taylor expanded in b around inf 87.1%

                \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{c}{b} + -1 \cdot \frac{a \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}}} \]
              5. Step-by-step derivation
                1. mul-1-neg87.1%

                  \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \frac{c}{b} + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{a \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}}\right)} \]
                2. unsub-neg87.1%

                  \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{c}{b} - \frac{a \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}}} \]
                3. mul-1-neg87.1%

                  \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{c}{b}\right)} - \frac{a \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}} \]
                4. distribute-neg-frac87.1%

                  \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-c}{b}} - \frac{a \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}} \]
                5. associate-/l*87.1%

                  \[\leadsto \frac{-c}{b} - \color{blue}{\frac{a}{\frac{{b}^{3}}{{c}^{2}}}} \]
              6. Simplified87.1%

                \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-c}{b} - \frac{a}{\frac{{b}^{3}}{{c}^{2}}}} \]
              7. Step-by-step derivation
                1. *-un-lft-identity87.1%

                  \[\leadsto \frac{-c}{b} - \frac{a}{\frac{\color{blue}{1 \cdot {b}^{3}}}{{c}^{2}}} \]
                2. unpow287.1%

                  \[\leadsto \frac{-c}{b} - \frac{a}{\frac{1 \cdot {b}^{3}}{\color{blue}{c \cdot c}}} \]
                3. times-frac87.1%

                  \[\leadsto \frac{-c}{b} - \frac{a}{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{c} \cdot \frac{{b}^{3}}{c}}} \]
              8. Applied egg-rr87.1%

                \[\leadsto \frac{-c}{b} - \frac{a}{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{c} \cdot \frac{{b}^{3}}{c}}} \]
            3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
            4. Final simplification86.8%

              \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq 2.4:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\sqrt{b \cdot b - c \cdot \left(a \cdot 4\right)} - b}{a \cdot 2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{-c}{b} - \frac{a}{\frac{1}{c} \cdot \frac{{b}^{3}}{c}}\\ \end{array} \]

            Alternative 7: 81.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

            \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{-c}{b} - \frac{a}{\frac{1}{c} \cdot \frac{{b}^{3}}{c}} \end{array} \]
            (FPCore (a b c)
             :precision binary64
             (- (/ (- c) b) (/ a (* (/ 1.0 c) (/ (pow b 3.0) c)))))
            double code(double a, double b, double c) {
            	return (-c / b) - (a / ((1.0 / c) * (pow(b, 3.0) / c)));
            }
            
            real(8) function code(a, b, c)
                real(8), intent (in) :: a
                real(8), intent (in) :: b
                real(8), intent (in) :: c
                code = (-c / b) - (a / ((1.0d0 / c) * ((b ** 3.0d0) / c)))
            end function
            
            public static double code(double a, double b, double c) {
            	return (-c / b) - (a / ((1.0 / c) * (Math.pow(b, 3.0) / c)));
            }
            
            def code(a, b, c):
            	return (-c / b) - (a / ((1.0 / c) * (math.pow(b, 3.0) / c)))
            
            function code(a, b, c)
            	return Float64(Float64(Float64(-c) / b) - Float64(a / Float64(Float64(1.0 / c) * Float64((b ^ 3.0) / c))))
            end
            
            function tmp = code(a, b, c)
            	tmp = (-c / b) - (a / ((1.0 / c) * ((b ^ 3.0) / c)));
            end
            
            code[a_, b_, c_] := N[(N[((-c) / b), $MachinePrecision] - N[(a / N[(N[(1.0 / c), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Power[b, 3.0], $MachinePrecision] / c), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
            
            \begin{array}{l}
            
            \\
            \frac{-c}{b} - \frac{a}{\frac{1}{c} \cdot \frac{{b}^{3}}{c}}
            \end{array}
            
            Derivation
            1. Initial program 55.8%

              \[\frac{\left(-b\right) + \sqrt{b \cdot b - \left(4 \cdot a\right) \cdot c}}{2 \cdot a} \]
            2. Step-by-step derivation
              1. *-commutative55.8%

                \[\leadsto \frac{\left(-b\right) + \sqrt{b \cdot b - \left(4 \cdot a\right) \cdot c}}{\color{blue}{a \cdot 2}} \]
            3. Simplified55.8%

              \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(-b\right) + \sqrt{b \cdot b - \left(4 \cdot a\right) \cdot c}}{a \cdot 2}} \]
            4. Taylor expanded in b around inf 81.5%

              \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{c}{b} + -1 \cdot \frac{a \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}}} \]
            5. Step-by-step derivation
              1. mul-1-neg81.5%

                \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \frac{c}{b} + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{a \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}}\right)} \]
              2. unsub-neg81.5%

                \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{c}{b} - \frac{a \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}}} \]
              3. mul-1-neg81.5%

                \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{c}{b}\right)} - \frac{a \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}} \]
              4. distribute-neg-frac81.5%

                \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-c}{b}} - \frac{a \cdot {c}^{2}}{{b}^{3}} \]
              5. associate-/l*81.5%

                \[\leadsto \frac{-c}{b} - \color{blue}{\frac{a}{\frac{{b}^{3}}{{c}^{2}}}} \]
            6. Simplified81.5%

              \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-c}{b} - \frac{a}{\frac{{b}^{3}}{{c}^{2}}}} \]
            7. Step-by-step derivation
              1. *-un-lft-identity81.5%

                \[\leadsto \frac{-c}{b} - \frac{a}{\frac{\color{blue}{1 \cdot {b}^{3}}}{{c}^{2}}} \]
              2. unpow281.5%

                \[\leadsto \frac{-c}{b} - \frac{a}{\frac{1 \cdot {b}^{3}}{\color{blue}{c \cdot c}}} \]
              3. times-frac81.5%

                \[\leadsto \frac{-c}{b} - \frac{a}{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{c} \cdot \frac{{b}^{3}}{c}}} \]
            8. Applied egg-rr81.5%

              \[\leadsto \frac{-c}{b} - \frac{a}{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{c} \cdot \frac{{b}^{3}}{c}}} \]
            9. Final simplification81.5%

              \[\leadsto \frac{-c}{b} - \frac{a}{\frac{1}{c} \cdot \frac{{b}^{3}}{c}} \]

            Alternative 8: 64.4% accurate, 29.0× speedup?

            \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{-c}{b} \end{array} \]
            (FPCore (a b c) :precision binary64 (/ (- c) b))
            double code(double a, double b, double c) {
            	return -c / b;
            }
            
            real(8) function code(a, b, c)
                real(8), intent (in) :: a
                real(8), intent (in) :: b
                real(8), intent (in) :: c
                code = -c / b
            end function
            
            public static double code(double a, double b, double c) {
            	return -c / b;
            }
            
            def code(a, b, c):
            	return -c / b
            
            function code(a, b, c)
            	return Float64(Float64(-c) / b)
            end
            
            function tmp = code(a, b, c)
            	tmp = -c / b;
            end
            
            code[a_, b_, c_] := N[((-c) / b), $MachinePrecision]
            
            \begin{array}{l}
            
            \\
            \frac{-c}{b}
            \end{array}
            
            Derivation
            1. Initial program 55.8%

              \[\frac{\left(-b\right) + \sqrt{b \cdot b - \left(4 \cdot a\right) \cdot c}}{2 \cdot a} \]
            2. Step-by-step derivation
              1. *-commutative55.8%

                \[\leadsto \frac{\left(-b\right) + \sqrt{b \cdot b - \left(4 \cdot a\right) \cdot c}}{\color{blue}{a \cdot 2}} \]
            3. Simplified55.8%

              \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(-b\right) + \sqrt{b \cdot b - \left(4 \cdot a\right) \cdot c}}{a \cdot 2}} \]
            4. Taylor expanded in b around inf 64.7%

              \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{c}{b}} \]
            5. Step-by-step derivation
              1. mul-1-neg64.7%

                \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\frac{c}{b}} \]
              2. distribute-neg-frac64.7%

                \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-c}{b}} \]
            6. Simplified64.7%

              \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-c}{b}} \]
            7. Final simplification64.7%

              \[\leadsto \frac{-c}{b} \]

            Alternative 9: 1.6% accurate, 38.7× speedup?

            \[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{c}{b} \end{array} \]
            (FPCore (a b c) :precision binary64 (/ c b))
            double code(double a, double b, double c) {
            	return c / b;
            }
            
            real(8) function code(a, b, c)
                real(8), intent (in) :: a
                real(8), intent (in) :: b
                real(8), intent (in) :: c
                code = c / b
            end function
            
            public static double code(double a, double b, double c) {
            	return c / b;
            }
            
            def code(a, b, c):
            	return c / b
            
            function code(a, b, c)
            	return Float64(c / b)
            end
            
            function tmp = code(a, b, c)
            	tmp = c / b;
            end
            
            code[a_, b_, c_] := N[(c / b), $MachinePrecision]
            
            \begin{array}{l}
            
            \\
            \frac{c}{b}
            \end{array}
            
            Derivation
            1. Initial program 55.8%

              \[\frac{\left(-b\right) + \sqrt{b \cdot b - \left(4 \cdot a\right) \cdot c}}{2 \cdot a} \]
            2. Step-by-step derivation
              1. *-commutative55.8%

                \[\leadsto \frac{\left(-b\right) + \sqrt{b \cdot b - \left(4 \cdot a\right) \cdot c}}{\color{blue}{a \cdot 2}} \]
            3. Simplified55.8%

              \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\left(-b\right) + \sqrt{b \cdot b - \left(4 \cdot a\right) \cdot c}}{a \cdot 2}} \]
            4. Taylor expanded in b around -inf 11.6%

              \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{b}{a} + \frac{c}{b}} \]
            5. Step-by-step derivation
              1. +-commutative11.6%

                \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{c}{b} + -1 \cdot \frac{b}{a}} \]
              2. mul-1-neg11.6%

                \[\leadsto \frac{c}{b} + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{b}{a}\right)} \]
              3. unsub-neg11.6%

                \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{c}{b} - \frac{b}{a}} \]
            6. Simplified11.6%

              \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{c}{b} - \frac{b}{a}} \]
            7. Taylor expanded in c around inf 1.6%

              \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{c}{b}} \]
            8. Final simplification1.6%

              \[\leadsto \frac{c}{b} \]

            Reproduce

            ?
            herbie shell --seed 2023305 
            (FPCore (a b c)
              :name "Quadratic roots, narrow range"
              :precision binary64
              :pre (and (and (and (< 1.0536712127723509e-8 a) (< a 94906265.62425156)) (and (< 1.0536712127723509e-8 b) (< b 94906265.62425156))) (and (< 1.0536712127723509e-8 c) (< c 94906265.62425156)))
              (/ (+ (- b) (sqrt (- (* b b) (* (* 4.0 a) c)))) (* 2.0 a)))