Sample trimmed logistic on [-pi, pi]

Percentage Accurate: 98.9% → 98.9%
Time: 19.6s
Alternatives: 10
Speedup: N/A×

Specification

?
\[\left(2.328306437 \cdot 10^{-10} \leq u \land u \leq 1\right) \land \left(0 \leq s \land s \leq 1.0651631\right)\]
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t_0\right) + t_0} - 1\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))
   (*
    (- s)
    (log
     (-
      (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) t_0)) t_0))
      1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float t_0 = 1.0f / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)));
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / ((u * ((1.0f / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - 1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	t_0 = Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - Float32(1.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	t_0 = single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)));
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / ((u * ((single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - single(1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t_0\right) + t_0} - 1\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary32 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 10 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 98.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t_0\right) + t_0} - 1\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))
   (*
    (- s)
    (log
     (-
      (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) t_0)) t_0))
      1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float t_0 = 1.0f / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)));
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / ((u * ((1.0f / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - 1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	t_0 = Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - Float32(1.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	t_0 = single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)));
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / ((u * ((single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - single(1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t_0\right) + t_0} - 1\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 98.9% accurate, 1.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  (- s)
  (log
   (+
    -1.0
    (/
     1.0
     (+
      (/ u (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI (- s)))))
      (/ (- 1.0 u) (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -s * logf((-1.0f + (1.0f / ((u / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / -s)))) + ((1.0f - u) / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s))))))));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(-1.0) + Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / Float32(-s))))) + Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s)))))))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = -s * log((single(-1.0) + (single(1.0) / ((u / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / -s)))) + ((single(1.0) - u) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s))))))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Final simplification98.9%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right) \]

Alternative 2: 37.7% accurate, 1.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(1 - e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{u \cdot 0.5 + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)\right)}\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  s
  (-
   1.0
   (exp
    (log1p
     (log
      (+ -1.0 (/ 1.0 (+ (* u 0.5) (/ (- 1.0 u) (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))))))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * (1.0f - expf(log1pf(logf((-1.0f + (1.0f / ((u * 0.5f) + ((1.0f - u) / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)))))))))));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(Float32(1.0) - exp(log1p(log(Float32(Float32(-1.0) + Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u * Float32(0.5)) + Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))))))))))
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(1 - e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{u \cdot 0.5 + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)\right)}\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Taylor expanded in s around inf 37.9%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + \color{blue}{1}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. expm1-log1p-u37.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + 1} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)\right)}\right) \]
    2. expm1-udef37.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\left(e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + 1} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} - 1\right)}\right) \]
  5. Applied egg-rr37.9%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\left(e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{u \cdot 0.5 - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)\right)} - 1\right)}\right) \]
  6. Final simplification37.9%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(1 - e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{u \cdot 0.5 + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)\right)}\right) \]

Alternative 3: 37.7% accurate, 1.7× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{2} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + {e}^{\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}}\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  (- s)
  (log (+ -1.0 (/ 1.0 (+ (/ u 2.0) (/ (- 1.0 u) (+ 1.0 (pow E (/ PI s))))))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -s * logf((-1.0f + (1.0f / ((u / 2.0f) + ((1.0f - u) / (1.0f + powf(((float) M_E), (((float) M_PI) / s))))))));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(-1.0) + Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u / Float32(2.0)) + Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + (Float32(exp(1)) ^ Float32(Float32(pi) / s)))))))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = -s * log((single(-1.0) + (single(1.0) / ((u / single(2.0)) + ((single(1.0) - u) / (single(1.0) + (single(2.71828182845904523536) ^ (single(pi) / s))))))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{2} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + {e}^{\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}}\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Taylor expanded in s around inf 37.9%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + \color{blue}{1}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-un-lft-identity37.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + 1} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
    2. exp-prod37.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + 1} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + \color{blue}{{\left(e^{1}\right)}^{\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  5. Applied egg-rr37.9%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + 1} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + \color{blue}{{\left(e^{1}\right)}^{\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  6. Step-by-step derivation
    1. exp-1-e37.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + 1} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + {\color{blue}{e}}^{\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  7. Simplified37.9%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + 1} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + \color{blue}{{e}^{\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  8. Final simplification37.9%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{2} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + {e}^{\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}}\right) \]

Alternative 4: 37.7% accurate, 2.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(1 + \left(-1 - \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{u \cdot 0.5 + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  s
  (+
   1.0
   (-
    -1.0
    (log
     (+ -1.0 (/ 1.0 (+ (* u 0.5) (/ (- 1.0 u) (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * (1.0f + (-1.0f - logf((-1.0f + (1.0f / ((u * 0.5f) + ((1.0f - u) / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s))))))))));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(Float32(1.0) + Float32(Float32(-1.0) - log(Float32(Float32(-1.0) + Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u * Float32(0.5)) + Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s)))))))))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * (single(1.0) + (single(-1.0) - log((single(-1.0) + (single(1.0) / ((u * single(0.5)) + ((single(1.0) - u) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s))))))))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(1 + \left(-1 - \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{u \cdot 0.5 + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Taylor expanded in s around inf 37.9%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + \color{blue}{1}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. expm1-log1p-u37.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + 1} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)\right)}\right) \]
    2. expm1-udef37.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\left(e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + 1} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} - 1\right)}\right) \]
  5. Applied egg-rr37.9%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\left(e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{u \cdot 0.5 - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)\right)} - 1\right)}\right) \]
  6. Applied egg-rr37.9%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{u \cdot 0.5 - \frac{-1 + u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)\right)} - 1\right)\right) \]
  7. Final simplification37.9%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(1 + \left(-1 - \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{u \cdot 0.5 + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)\right)\right) \]

Alternative 5: 37.7% accurate, 2.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{2} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\pi \cdot \frac{1}{s}}}}\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  (- s)
  (log
   (+
    -1.0
    (/ 1.0 (+ (/ u 2.0) (/ (- 1.0 u) (+ 1.0 (exp (* PI (/ 1.0 s)))))))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -s * logf((-1.0f + (1.0f / ((u / 2.0f) + ((1.0f - u) / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) * (1.0f / s)))))))));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(-1.0) + Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u / Float32(2.0)) + Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(Float32(1.0) / s))))))))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = -s * log((single(-1.0) + (single(1.0) / ((u / single(2.0)) + ((single(1.0) - u) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) * (single(1.0) / s)))))))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{2} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\pi \cdot \frac{1}{s}}}}\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Taylor expanded in s around inf 37.9%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + \color{blue}{1}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. clear-num37.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + 1} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{s}{\pi}}}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
    2. associate-/r/37.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + 1} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{s} \cdot \pi}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  5. Applied egg-rr37.9%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + 1} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{s} \cdot \pi}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  6. Final simplification37.9%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{2} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\pi \cdot \frac{1}{s}}}}\right) \]

Alternative 6: 37.7% accurate, 2.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{u \cdot 0.5 + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  (- s)
  (log (+ -1.0 (/ 1.0 (+ (* u 0.5) (/ (- 1.0 u) (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -s * logf((-1.0f + (1.0f / ((u * 0.5f) + ((1.0f - u) / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s))))))));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(-1.0) + Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u * Float32(0.5)) + Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s)))))))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = -s * log((single(-1.0) + (single(1.0) / ((u * single(0.5)) + ((single(1.0) - u) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s))))))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{u \cdot 0.5 + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Taylor expanded in s around inf 37.9%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + \color{blue}{1}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. distribute-rgt-neg-out37.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + 1} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
    2. add-sqr-sqrt37.9%

      \[\leadsto -s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + 1} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \cdot \sqrt{\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + 1} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)}\right)} \]
    3. sqrt-unprod37.9%

      \[\leadsto -s \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + 1} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + 1} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)}} \]
    4. sqr-neg37.9%

      \[\leadsto -s \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + 1} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right) \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + 1} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)}} \]
    5. sqrt-unprod-0.0%

      \[\leadsto -s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + 1} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \cdot \sqrt{-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + 1} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)}\right)} \]
  5. Applied egg-rr37.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{u \cdot 0.5 - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)} \]
  6. Step-by-step derivation
    1. distribute-lft-neg-in37.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{u \cdot 0.5 - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)} \]
    2. *-commutative37.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\color{blue}{0.5 \cdot u} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right) \]
    3. +-commutative37.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{0.5 \cdot u - \frac{\color{blue}{-1 + u}}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right) \]
  7. Simplified37.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{0.5 \cdot u - \frac{-1 + u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)} \]
  8. Final simplification37.9%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{u \cdot 0.5 + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right) \]

Alternative 7: 11.6% accurate, 6.8× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.5 + -0.25\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (* 4.0 (* PI (+ (* u 0.5) -0.25))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return 4.0f * (((float) M_PI) * ((u * 0.5f) + -0.25f));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(4.0) * Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(Float32(u * Float32(0.5)) + Float32(-0.25))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = single(4.0) * (single(pi) * ((u * single(0.5)) + single(-0.25)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.5 + -0.25\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Taylor expanded in s around inf 12.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate--r+12.0%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) - 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)} \]
    2. cancel-sign-sub-inv12.0%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right)} \]
    3. distribute-rgt-out--12.0%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot \left(0.25 - -0.25\right)} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right) \]
    4. *-commutative12.0%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot u\right)} \cdot \left(0.25 - -0.25\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right) \]
    5. metadata-eval12.0%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot \color{blue}{0.5} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right) \]
    6. metadata-eval12.0%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{-0.25} \cdot \pi\right) \]
    7. *-commutative12.0%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \color{blue}{\pi \cdot -0.25}\right) \]
  5. Simplified12.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(\left(\pi \cdot u\right) \cdot 0.5 + \pi \cdot -0.25\right)} \]
  6. Taylor expanded in u around 0 12.0%

    \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.5 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
  7. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative12.0%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + -0.25 \cdot \pi\right)} \]
    2. associate-*r*12.0%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot u\right) \cdot \pi} + -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) \]
    3. *-commutative12.0%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(u \cdot 0.5\right)} \cdot \pi + -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) \]
    4. distribute-rgt-out12.0%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.5 + -0.25\right)\right)} \]
    5. *-commutative12.0%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(\color{blue}{0.5 \cdot u} + -0.25\right)\right) \]
  8. Simplified12.0%

    \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot \left(0.5 \cdot u + -0.25\right)\right)} \]
  9. Final simplification12.0%

    \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.5 + -0.25\right)\right) \]

Alternative 8: 37.2% accurate, 6.8× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{2}{u}\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (* s (- (log (+ -1.0 (/ 2.0 u))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * -logf((-1.0f + (2.0f / u)));
}
real(4) function code(u, s)
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    real(4), intent (in) :: s
    code = s * -log(((-1.0e0) + (2.0e0 / u)))
end function
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(-log(Float32(Float32(-1.0) + Float32(Float32(2.0) / u)))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * -log((single(-1.0) + (single(2.0) / u)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{2}{u}\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Taylor expanded in s around inf 37.9%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + \color{blue}{1}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  4. Taylor expanded in s around inf 36.2%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + 1} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  5. Taylor expanded in s around 0 36.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(s \cdot \log \left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{u} - 1\right)\right)} \]
  6. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate-*r*36.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot s\right) \cdot \log \left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{u} - 1\right)} \]
    2. neg-mul-136.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right)} \cdot \log \left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{u} - 1\right) \]
    3. sub-neg36.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{u} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]
    4. associate-*r/36.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{u}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]
    5. metadata-eval36.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{\color{blue}{2}}{u} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]
    6. metadata-eval36.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{2}{u} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]
  7. Simplified36.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{2}{u} + -1\right)} \]
  8. Final simplification36.9%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{2}{u}\right)\right) \]

Alternative 9: 11.4% accurate, 7.2× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -\pi \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (- PI))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -((float) M_PI);
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(-Float32(pi))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = -single(pi);
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
-\pi
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Taylor expanded in u around 0 11.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \pi} \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. neg-mul-111.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\pi} \]
  5. Simplified11.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\pi} \]
  6. Final simplification11.8%

    \[\leadsto -\pi \]

Alternative 10: 10.3% accurate, 243.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot 0 \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (* s 0.0))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * 0.0f;
}
real(4) function code(u, s)
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    real(4), intent (in) :: s
    code = s * 0.0e0
end function
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(0.0))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * single(0.0);
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot 0
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Taylor expanded in s around inf 37.9%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + \color{blue}{1}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. expm1-log1p-u37.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + 1} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)\right)}\right) \]
    2. expm1-udef37.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\left(e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + 1} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} - 1\right)}\right) \]
  5. Applied egg-rr37.9%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\left(e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{u \cdot 0.5 - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)\right)} - 1\right)}\right) \]
  6. Taylor expanded in s around inf 10.5%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\left(\color{blue}{1} - 1\right)\right) \]
  7. Final simplification10.5%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot 0 \]

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2023305 
(FPCore (u s)
  :name "Sample trimmed logistic on [-pi, pi]"
  :precision binary32
  :pre (and (and (<= 2.328306437e-10 u) (<= u 1.0)) (and (<= 0.0 s) (<= s 1.0651631)))
  (* (- s) (log (- (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))) (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))) 1.0))))