Linear.Quaternion:$c/ from linear-1.19.1.3, B

Percentage Accurate: 62.2% → 100.0%

Time: 4.4s

Alternatives: 3

Speedup: 3.0×

• 21.1% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x \cdot y - y \cdot z\right) - y \cdot y\right) + y \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (- (- (* x y) (* y z)) (* y y)) (* y y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (((x * y) - (y * z)) - (y * y)) + (y * y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (((x * y) - (y * z)) - (y * y)) + (y * y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (((x * y) - (y * z)) - (y * y)) + (y * y);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (((x * y) - (y * z)) - (y * y)) + (y * y)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) - Float64(y * z)) - Float64(y * y)) + Float64(y * y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (((x * y) - (y * z)) - (y * y)) + (y * y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 62.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(x \cdot y - y \cdot z\right) - y \cdot y\right) + y \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (- (- (* x y) (* y z)) (* y y)) (* y y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (((x * y) - (y * z)) - (y * y)) + (y * y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (((x * y) - (y * z)) - (y * y)) + (y * y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (((x * y) - (y * z)) - (y * y)) + (y * y);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (((x * y) - (y * z)) - (y * y)) + (y * y)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * y) - Float64(y * z)) - Float64(y * y)) + Float64(y * y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (((x * y) - (y * z)) - (y * y)) + (y * y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 3.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ y \cdot \left(x - z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* y (- x z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return y * (x - z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = y * (x - z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return y * (x - z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return y * (x - z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(y * Float64(x - z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = y * (x - z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(y * N[(x - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 66.4%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot y - y \cdot z\right) - y \cdot y\right) + y \cdot y \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+l- 76.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y - y \cdot z\right) - \left(y \cdot y - y \cdot y\right)} \]

   2. +-inverses 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot y - y \cdot z\right) - \color{blue}{0} \]

   3. --rgt-identity 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y - y \cdot z} \]

   4. *-commutative 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} - y \cdot z \]

   5. distribute-lft-out-- 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x - z\right)} \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x - z\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto y \cdot \left(x - z\right) \]

Alternative 2: 76.3% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.02 \cdot 10^{-42} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 4 \cdot 10^{-97} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 3 \cdot 10^{-23}\right) \land x \leq 5.3 \cdot 10^{+42}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(-y\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -1.02e-42)
         (not (or (<= x 4e-97) (and (not (<= x 3e-23)) (<= x 5.3e+42)))))
   (* y x)
   (* z (- y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.02e-42) || !((x <= 4e-97) || (!(x <= 3e-23) && (x <= 5.3e+42)))) {
		tmp = y * x;
	} else {
		tmp = z * -y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-1.02d-42)) .or. (.not. (x <= 4d-97) .or. (.not. (x <= 3d-23)) .and. (x <= 5.3d+42))) then
        tmp = y * x
    else
        tmp = z * -y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.02e-42) || !((x <= 4e-97) || (!(x <= 3e-23) && (x <= 5.3e+42)))) {
		tmp = y * x;
	} else {
		tmp = z * -y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -1.02e-42) or not ((x <= 4e-97) or (not (x <= 3e-23) and (x <= 5.3e+42))):
		tmp = y * x
	else:
		tmp = z * -y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -1.02e-42) || !((x <= 4e-97) || (!(x <= 3e-23) && (x <= 5.3e+42))))
		tmp = Float64(y * x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(-y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -1.02e-42) || ~(((x <= 4e-97) || (~((x <= 3e-23)) && (x <= 5.3e+42)))))
		tmp = y * x;
	else
		tmp = z * -y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -1.02e-42], N[Not[Or[LessEqual[x, 4e-97], And[N[Not[LessEqual[x, 3e-23]], $MachinePrecision], LessEqual[x, 5.3e+42]]]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision], N[(z * (-y)), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1.0199999999999999e-42 or 4.00000000000000014e-97 < x < 3.00000000000000003e-23 or 5.30000000000000028e42 < x

   1. Initial program 68.2%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y - y \cdot z\right) - y \cdot y\right) + y \cdot y \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 72.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y - y \cdot z\right) - \left(y \cdot y - y \cdot y\right)} \]

      2. +-inverses 95.9%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot y - y \cdot z\right) - \color{blue}{0} \]

      3. --rgt-identity 95.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y - y \cdot z} \]

      4. *-commutative 95.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} - y \cdot z \]

      5. distribute-lft-out-- 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x - z\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x - z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 80.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 80.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   6. Simplified 80.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

   if -1.0199999999999999e-42 < x < 4.00000000000000014e-97 or 3.00000000000000003e-23 < x < 5.30000000000000028e42

   1. Initial program 64.0%

      \[\left(\left(x \cdot y - y \cdot z\right) - y \cdot y\right) + y \cdot y \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+l- 81.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y - y \cdot z\right) - \left(y \cdot y - y \cdot y\right)} \]

      2. +-inverses 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot y - y \cdot z\right) - \color{blue}{0} \]

      3. --rgt-identity 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y - y \cdot z} \]

      4. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} - y \cdot z \]

      5. distribute-lft-out-- 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x - z\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x - z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 90.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 90.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot y\right) \cdot z} \]

      2. neg-mul-1 90.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} \cdot z \]

   6. Simplified 90.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 84.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.02 \cdot 10^{-42} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 4 \cdot 10^{-97} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 3 \cdot 10^{-23}\right) \land x \leq 5.3 \cdot 10^{+42}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(-y\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 53.8% accurate, 5.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ y \cdot x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* y x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return y * x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = y * x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return y * x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return y * x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(y * x)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = y * x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(y * x), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 66.4%

   \[\left(\left(x \cdot y - y \cdot z\right) - y \cdot y\right) + y \cdot y \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-+l- 76.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot y - y \cdot z\right) - \left(y \cdot y - y \cdot y\right)} \]

   2. +-inverses 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \left(x \cdot y - y \cdot z\right) - \color{blue}{0} \]

   3. --rgt-identity 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y - y \cdot z} \]

   4. *-commutative 97.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} - y \cdot z \]

   5. distribute-lft-out-- 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x - z\right)} \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x - z\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 57.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot y} \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 57.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

6. Simplified 57.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot x} \]

7. Final simplification 57.2%

   \[\leadsto y \cdot x \]

Developer target: 100.0% accurate, 3.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x - z\right) \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* (- x z) y))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x - z) * y;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x - z) * y
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x - z) * y;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x - z) * y

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x - z) * y)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x - z) * y;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x - z), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023302 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Linear.Quaternion:$c/ from linear-1.19.1.3, B"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (* (- x z) y)

  (+ (- (- (* x y) (* y z)) (* y y)) (* y y)))