Main:bigenough2 from A

Percentage Accurate: 100.0% → 100.0%

Time: 2.6s

Alternatives: 5

Speedup: 1.0×

• 20.7% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* y (+ z x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z + x));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (y * (z + x))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z + x));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (y * (z + x))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z + x)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (y * (z + x));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(z + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* y (+ z x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z + x));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (y * (z + x))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (z + x));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (y * (z + x))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z + x)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (y * (z + x));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(z + x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x + z, x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (fma y (+ x z) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return fma(y, (x + z), x);
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return fma(y, Float64(x + z), x)
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(y * N[(x + z), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z + x\right) + x} \]

   2. fma-def 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z + x, x\right)} \]

   3. +-commutative 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, \color{blue}{x + z}, x\right) \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, x + z, x\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y, x + z, x\right) \]

Alternative 2: 83.3% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2.3 \cdot 10^{-84} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.4 \cdot 10^{-37}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -2.3e-84) (not (<= y 1.4e-37))) (* y (+ x z)) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -2.3e-84) || !(y <= 1.4e-37)) {
		tmp = y * (x + z);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-2.3d-84)) .or. (.not. (y <= 1.4d-37))) then
        tmp = y * (x + z)
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -2.3e-84) || !(y <= 1.4e-37)) {
		tmp = y * (x + z);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -2.3e-84) or not (y <= 1.4e-37):
		tmp = y * (x + z)
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -2.3e-84) || !(y <= 1.4e-37))
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(x + z));
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -2.3e-84) || ~((y <= 1.4e-37)))
		tmp = y * (x + z);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -2.3e-84], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 1.4e-37]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * N[(x + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], x]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -2.29999999999999981e-84 or 1.4000000000000001e-37 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around inf 91.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(x + z\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 91.9%

         \[\leadsto y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z + x\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 91.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z + x\right)} \]

   if -2.29999999999999981e-84 < y < 1.4000000000000001e-37

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around 0 79.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 86.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2.3 \cdot 10^{-84} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.4 \cdot 10^{-37}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(x + z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 60.4% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.12 \cdot 10^{-84} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 9.6 \cdot 10^{-38}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -1.12e-84) (not (<= y 9.6e-38))) (* y z) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -1.12e-84) || !(y <= 9.6e-38)) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-1.12d-84)) .or. (.not. (y <= 9.6d-38))) then
        tmp = y * z
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -1.12e-84) || !(y <= 9.6e-38)) {
		tmp = y * z;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -1.12e-84) or not (y <= 9.6e-38):
		tmp = y * z
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -1.12e-84) || !(y <= 9.6e-38))
		tmp = Float64(y * z);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -1.12e-84) || ~((y <= 9.6e-38)))
		tmp = y * z;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -1.12e-84], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 9.6e-38]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], x]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -1.12000000000000007e-84 or 9.60000000000000089e-38 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 53.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot z} \]

   if -1.12000000000000007e-84 < y < 9.60000000000000089e-38

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around 0 79.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 65.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.12 \cdot 10^{-84} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 9.6 \cdot 10^{-38}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(x + z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* y (+ x z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (x + z));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (y * (x + z))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * (x + z));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (y * (x + z))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(x + z)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (y * (x + z));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(x + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]

2. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(x + z\right) \]

Alternative 5: 35.9% accurate, 7.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[x + y \cdot \left(z + x\right) \]

2. Taylor expanded in y around 0 41.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

3. Final simplification 41.1%

   \[\leadsto x \]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023301 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Main:bigenough2 from A"
  :precision binary64
  (+ x (* y (+ z x))))