Optimisation.CirclePacking:place from circle-packing-0.1.0.4, H

Percentage Accurate: 100.0% → 100.0%

Time: 4.7s

Alternatives: 7

Speedup: 1.0×

• 21.0% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* (+ x y) (- 1.0 z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) * (1.0 - z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x + y) * (1.0d0 - z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) * (1.0 - z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x + y) * (1.0 - z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x + y) * Float64(1.0 - z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x + y) * (1.0 - z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* (+ x y) (- 1.0 z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) * (1.0 - z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x + y) * (1.0d0 - z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) * (1.0 - z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x + y) * (1.0 - z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x + y) * Float64(1.0 - z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x + y) * (1.0 - z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(1 - z\right) \cdot \left(x + y\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (* (- 1.0 z) (+ x y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (1.0 - z) * (x + y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (1.0d0 - z) * (x + y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (1.0 - z) * (x + y);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (1.0 - z) * (x + y)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(1.0 - z) * Float64(x + y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (1.0 - z) * (x + y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision] * N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]

2. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \left(1 - z\right) \cdot \left(x + y\right) \]

Alternative 2: 97.2% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;1 - z \leq -4 \cdot 10^{+14} \lor \neg \left(1 - z \leq 2\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(\left(-x\right) - y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (- 1.0 z) -4e+14) (not (<= (- 1.0 z) 2.0)))
   (* z (- (- x) y))
   (+ x y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (((1.0 - z) <= -4e+14) || !((1.0 - z) <= 2.0)) {
		tmp = z * (-x - y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((1.0d0 - z) <= (-4d+14)) .or. (.not. ((1.0d0 - z) <= 2.0d0))) then
        tmp = z * (-x - y)
    else
        tmp = x + y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (((1.0 - z) <= -4e+14) || !((1.0 - z) <= 2.0)) {
		tmp = z * (-x - y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if ((1.0 - z) <= -4e+14) or not ((1.0 - z) <= 2.0):
		tmp = z * (-x - y)
	else:
		tmp = x + y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(1.0 - z) <= -4e+14) || !(Float64(1.0 - z) <= 2.0))
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(Float64(-x) - y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((1.0 - z) <= -4e+14) || ~(((1.0 - z) <= 2.0)))
		tmp = z * (-x - y);
	else
		tmp = x + y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision], -4e+14], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision], 2.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z * N[((-x) - y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (-.f64 1 z) < -4e14 or 2 < (-.f64 1 z)

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(x + y\right)\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(x + y\right)} \]

      2. neg-mul-1 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)} \cdot \left(x + y\right) \]

      3. *-commutative 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]

      4. +-commutative 99.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right)} \cdot \left(-z\right) \]

   4. Simplified 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y + x\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]

   if -4e14 < (-.f64 1 z) < 2

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around 0 98.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 98.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

   4. Simplified 98.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;1 - z \leq -4 \cdot 10^{+14} \lor \neg \left(1 - z \leq 2\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(\left(-x\right) - y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 75.6% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -7.8 \cdot 10^{-13} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 4.8 \cdot 10^{-7}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -7.8e-13) (not (<= z 4.8e-7))) (* y (- 1.0 z)) (+ x y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -7.8e-13) || !(z <= 4.8e-7)) {
		tmp = y * (1.0 - z);
	} else {
		tmp = x + y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-7.8d-13)) .or. (.not. (z <= 4.8d-7))) then
        tmp = y * (1.0d0 - z)
    else
        tmp = x + y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -7.8e-13) || !(z <= 4.8e-7)) {
		tmp = y * (1.0 - z);
	} else {
		tmp = x + y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -7.8e-13) or not (z <= 4.8e-7):
		tmp = y * (1.0 - z)
	else:
		tmp = x + y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -7.8e-13) || !(z <= 4.8e-7))
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(1.0 - z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -7.8e-13) || ~((z <= 4.8e-7)))
		tmp = y * (1.0 - z);
	else
		tmp = x + y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -7.8e-13], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 4.8e-7]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -7.80000000000000009e-13 or 4.79999999999999957e-7 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 48.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]

   if -7.80000000000000009e-13 < z < 4.79999999999999957e-7

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

   4. Simplified 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 74.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -7.8 \cdot 10^{-13} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 4.8 \cdot 10^{-7}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 74.9% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -51 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(-z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -51.0) (not (<= z 1.0))) (* y (- z)) (+ x y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -51.0) || !(z <= 1.0)) {
		tmp = y * -z;
	} else {
		tmp = x + y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-51.0d0)) .or. (.not. (z <= 1.0d0))) then
        tmp = y * -z
    else
        tmp = x + y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -51.0) || !(z <= 1.0)) {
		tmp = y * -z;
	} else {
		tmp = x + y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -51.0) or not (z <= 1.0):
		tmp = y * -z
	else:
		tmp = x + y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -51.0) || !(z <= 1.0))
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(-z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -51.0) || ~((z <= 1.0)))
		tmp = y * -z;
	else
		tmp = x + y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -51.0], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 1.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * (-z)), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -51 or 1 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \left(x + y\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-z\right)\right)} \]

      2. distribute-lft-in 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) \cdot 1 + \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]

      3. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} + \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(-z\right) \]

      4. *-un-lft-identity 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)} + \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(-z\right) \]

   3. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right) + \left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 48.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + -1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 48.1%

         \[\leadsto y + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot y\right) \cdot z} \]

      2. *-commutative 48.1%

         \[\leadsto y + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot -1\right)} \cdot z \]

      3. associate-*r* 48.1%

         \[\leadsto y + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-1 \cdot z\right)} \]

      4. mul-1-neg 48.1%

         \[\leadsto y + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 48.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + y \cdot \left(-z\right)} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in z around inf 48.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 48.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot y\right) \cdot z} \]

      2. neg-mul-1 48.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y\right)} \cdot z \]

   9. Simplified 48.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot z} \]

   if -51 < z < 1

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around 0 98.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 98.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

   4. Simplified 98.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 74.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -51 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(-z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 62.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{-118}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 1.25e-118) (* x (- 1.0 z)) (* y (- 1.0 z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.25e-118) {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	} else {
		tmp = y * (1.0 - z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 1.25d-118) then
        tmp = x * (1.0d0 - z)
    else
        tmp = y * (1.0d0 - z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.25e-118) {
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	} else {
		tmp = y * (1.0 - z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 1.25e-118:
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z)
	else:
		tmp = y * (1.0 - z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 1.25e-118)
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(1.0 - z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(1.0 - z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 1.25e-118)
		tmp = x * (1.0 - z);
	else
		tmp = y * (1.0 - z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, 1.25e-118], N[(x * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(y * N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 1.25000000000000004e-118

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 65.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 65.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]

   4. Simplified 65.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) \cdot x} \]

   if 1.25000000000000004e-118 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 60.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 63.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{-118}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6: 50.2% accurate, 2.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x y))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + y;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + y
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + y;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + y

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + y)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + y;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]

2. Taylor expanded in z around 0 52.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y} \]
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 52.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

4. Simplified 52.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

5. Final simplification 52.4%

   \[\leadsto x + y \]

Alternative 7: 25.9% accurate, 7.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 y)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return y;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = y
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return y;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return y

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return y
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = y;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := y

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(x + y\right) \cdot \left(1 - z\right) \]

2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 44.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(1 - z\right)} \]

3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 21.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y} \]

4. Final simplification 21.9%

   \[\leadsto y \]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023301 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Optimisation.CirclePacking:place from circle-packing-0.1.0.4, H"
  :precision binary64
  (* (+ x y) (- 1.0 z)))