SynthBasics:moogVCF from YampaSynth-0.2

Percentage Accurate: 93.6% → 98.6%

Time: 10.2s

Alternatives: 7

Speedup: 0.7×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (* (* y z) (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y))));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + ((y * z) * (math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y))))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * z) * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 93.6% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (* (* y z) (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y))));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + ((y * z) * (math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y))))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * z) * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.6% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := x + \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t_1 \leq -\infty:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t_1 \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+306}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(z \cdot t - z \cdot x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ x (* (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))) (* y z)))))
   (if (<= t_1 (- INFINITY))
     (+ x (* z (- t x)))
     (if (<= t_1 4e+306) t_1 (+ x (- (* z t) (* z x)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = x + ((tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))) * (y * z));
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= -((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	} else if (t_1 <= 4e+306) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = x + ((z * t) - (z * x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = x + ((Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y))) * (y * z));
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= -Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	} else if (t_1 <= 4e+306) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = x + ((z * t) - (z * x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	t_1 = x + ((math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y))) * (y * z))
	tmp = 0
	if t_1 <= -math.inf:
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
	elif t_1 <= 4e+306:
		tmp = t_1
	else:
		tmp = x + ((z * t) - (z * x))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y))) * Float64(y * z)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_1 <= Float64(-Inf))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(t - x)));
	elseif (t_1 <= 4e+306)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(z * t) - Float64(z * x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = x + ((tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))) * (y * z));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_1 <= -Inf)
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	elseif (t_1 <= 4e+306)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = x + ((z * t) - (z * x));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(x + N[(N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, (-Infinity)], N[(x + N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t$95$1, 4e+306], t$95$1, N[(x + N[(N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision] - N[(z * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (+.f64 x (*.f64 (*.f64 y z) (-.f64 (tanh.f64 (/.f64 t y)) (tanh.f64 (/.f64 x y))))) < -inf.0

   1. Initial program 55.3%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]

   if -inf.0 < (+.f64 x (*.f64 (*.f64 y z) (-.f64 (tanh.f64 (/.f64 t y)) (tanh.f64 (/.f64 x y))))) < 4.00000000000000007e306

   1. Initial program 99.5%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   if 4.00000000000000007e306 < (+.f64 x (*.f64 (*.f64 y z) (-.f64 (tanh.f64 (/.f64 t y)) (tanh.f64 (/.f64 x y)))))

   1. Initial program 37.6%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around inf 99.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t + \left(-x\right)\right)} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-in 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z + \left(-x\right) \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) \cdot z + t \cdot z\right)} \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) \cdot z + t \cdot z\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z + \left(-x\right) \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot t} + \left(-x\right) \cdot z\right) \]

      3. distribute-lft-neg-out 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(z \cdot t + \color{blue}{\left(-x \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      4. unsub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot t - x \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot t - x \cdot z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x + \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) \leq -\infty:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x + \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+306}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(z \cdot t - z \cdot x\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 2: 97.6% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 9.5 \cdot 10^{+232}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 9.5e+232)
   (fma y (* z (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y)))) x)
   (+ x (* z (- t x)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 9.5e+232) {
		tmp = fma(y, (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))), x);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 9.5e+232)
		tmp = fma(y, Float64(z * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y)))), x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(t - x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y, 9.5e+232], N[(y * N[(z * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 9.4999999999999996e232

   1. Initial program 94.7%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 94.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

      2. associate-*l* 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. fma-def 97.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   if 9.4999999999999996e232 < y

   1. Initial program 66.1%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around inf 96.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 97.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 9.5 \cdot 10^{+232}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 82.6% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.4 \cdot 10^{+182}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 1.4e+182) (+ x (* y (* z (tanh (/ t y))))) (+ x (* z (- t x)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.4e+182) {
		tmp = x + (y * (z * tanh((t / y))));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 1.4d+182) then
        tmp = x + (y * (z * tanh((t / y))))
    else
        tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.4e+182) {
		tmp = x + (y * (z * Math.tanh((t / y))));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 1.4e+182:
		tmp = x + (y * (z * math.tanh((t / y))))
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 1.4e+182)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z * tanh(Float64(t / y)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(t - x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 1.4e+182)
		tmp = x + (y * (z * tanh((t / y))));
	else
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y, 1.4e+182], N[(x + N[(y * N[(z * N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 1.40000000000000003e182

   1. Initial program 94.9%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 24.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 23.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)} \]

      2. associate-/r* 23.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right) \]

      3. div-sub 23.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}} \]

      4. rec-exp 23.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} \]

      5. rec-exp 23.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}} \]

      6. tanh-def-a 79.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]

      7. associate-*r* 81.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 81.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)\right)} \]

   if 1.40000000000000003e182 < y

   1. Initial program 74.3%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around inf 97.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 83.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.4 \cdot 10^{+182}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 68.6% accurate, 19.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 6.4 \cdot 10^{-16}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(z \cdot t - z \cdot x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 6.4e-16) x (+ x (- (* z t) (* z x)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 6.4e-16) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + ((z * t) - (z * x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 6.4d-16) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = x + ((z * t) - (z * x))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 6.4e-16) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + ((z * t) - (z * x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 6.4e-16:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = x + ((z * t) - (z * x))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 6.4e-16)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(z * t) - Float64(z * x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 6.4e-16)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = x + ((z * t) - (z * x));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y, 6.4e-16], x, N[(x + N[(N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision] - N[(z * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 6.40000000000000046e-16

   1. Initial program 95.1%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 95.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

      2. associate-*l* 97.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. fma-def 97.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 66.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 6.40000000000000046e-16 < y

   1. Initial program 83.6%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around inf 86.4%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 86.4%

         \[\leadsto x + z \cdot \color{blue}{\left(t + \left(-x\right)\right)} \]

      2. distribute-rgt-in 86.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z + \left(-x\right) \cdot z\right)} \]

      3. +-commutative 86.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) \cdot z + t \cdot z\right)} \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 86.4%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-x\right) \cdot z + t \cdot z\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 86.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(t \cdot z + \left(-x\right) \cdot z\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 86.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot t} + \left(-x\right) \cdot z\right) \]

      3. distribute-lft-neg-out 86.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(z \cdot t + \color{blue}{\left(-x \cdot z\right)}\right) \]

      4. unsub-neg 86.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot t - x \cdot z\right)} \]

   6. Applied egg-rr 86.4%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot t - x \cdot z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 71.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 6.4 \cdot 10^{-16}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(z \cdot t - z \cdot x\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 68.9% accurate, 23.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 8.4 \cdot 10^{-16}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 8.4e-16) x (+ x (* z (- t x)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 8.4e-16) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 8.4d-16) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 8.4e-16) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 8.4e-16:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 8.4e-16)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(t - x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 8.4e-16)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y, 8.4e-16], x, N[(x + N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 8.4000000000000004e-16

   1. Initial program 95.1%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 95.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

      2. associate-*l* 97.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. fma-def 97.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 66.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 8.4000000000000004e-16 < y

   1. Initial program 83.6%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around inf 86.4%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 71.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 8.4 \cdot 10^{-16}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6: 65.3% accurate, 30.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.15 \cdot 10^{-10}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (if (<= y 2.15e-10) x (+ x (* z t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 2.15e-10) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 2.15d-10) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = x + (z * t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 2.15e-10) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 2.15e-10:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 2.15e-10)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 2.15e-10)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = x + (z * t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y, 2.15e-10], x, N[(x + N[(z * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 2.15000000000000007e-10

   1. Initial program 95.1%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 95.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

      2. associate-*l* 97.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

      3. fma-def 97.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 66.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 2.15000000000000007e-10 < y

   1. Initial program 83.6%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 30.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 29.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)} \]

      2. associate-/r* 29.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right) \]

      3. div-sub 29.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}} \]

      4. rec-exp 29.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} \]

      5. rec-exp 29.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}} \]

      6. tanh-def-a 63.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]

      7. associate-*r* 69.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 69.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 62.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + t \cdot z} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 62.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 62.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot t} + x \]

   7. Simplified 62.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot t + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 65.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.15 \cdot 10^{-10}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot t\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 7: 60.2% accurate, 213.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 92.5%

   \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 92.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

   2. associate-*l* 96.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right)} + x \]

   3. fma-def 96.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

3. Simplified 96.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), x\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 58.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

5. Final simplification 58.8%

   \[\leadsto x \]

Developer target: 97.1% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (* y (* z (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + (y * (z * (Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y)))));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + (y * (z * (math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y)))))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y))))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(z * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023301 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "SynthBasics:moogVCF from YampaSynth-0.2"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (+ x (* y (* z (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))

  (+ x (* (* y z) (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))