Sample trimmed logistic on [-pi, pi]

Percentage Accurate: 99.0% → 100.0%
Time: 22.6s
Alternatives: 13
Speedup: 0.4×

Specification

?
\[\left(2.328306437 \cdot 10^{-10} \leq u \land u \leq 1\right) \land \left(0 \leq s \land s \leq 1.0651631\right)\]
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t_0\right) + t_0} - 1\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))
   (*
    (- s)
    (log
     (-
      (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) t_0)) t_0))
      1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float t_0 = 1.0f / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)));
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / ((u * ((1.0f / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - 1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	t_0 = Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - Float32(1.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	t_0 = single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)));
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / ((u * ((single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - single(1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t_0\right) + t_0} - 1\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary32 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 13 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 99.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t_0\right) + t_0} - 1\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))
   (*
    (- s)
    (log
     (-
      (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) t_0)) t_0))
      1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float t_0 = 1.0f / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)));
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / ((u * ((1.0f / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - 1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	t_0 = Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - Float32(1.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	t_0 = single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)));
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / ((u * ((single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - single(1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t_0\right) + t_0} - 1\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 0.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \langle \left( \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right) \right)_{\text{binary64}} \rangle_{\text{binary32}} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (cast
  (!
   :precision
   binary64
   (*
    (- s)
    (log
     (+
      -1.0
      (/
       1.0
       (-
        (/ u (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI (- s)))))
        (/ (+ u -1.0) (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	double tmp = -((double) s) * log((-1.0 + (1.0 / ((((double) u) / (1.0 + exp((((double) M_PI) / -((double) s))))) - ((((double) u) + -1.0) / (1.0 + exp((((double) M_PI) / ((double) s)))))))));
	return (float) tmp;
}
function code(u, s)
	tmp = Float64(Float64(-Float64(s)) * log(Float64(-1.0 + Float64(1.0 / Float64(Float64(Float64(u) / Float64(1.0 + exp(Float64(pi / Float64(-Float64(s)))))) - Float64(Float64(Float64(u) + -1.0) / Float64(1.0 + exp(Float64(pi / Float64(s))))))))))
	return Float32(tmp)
end
function tmp_2 = code(u, s)
	tmp = -s * log((-1.0 + (1.0 / ((double(u) / (1.0 + exp((pi / -s)))) - ((double(u) + -1.0) / (1.0 + exp((pi / double(s)))))))));
	tmp_2 = single(tmp);
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\langle \left( \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right) \right)_{\text{binary64}} \rangle_{\text{binary32}}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 100.0%

    \[\langle s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right) \rangle_{\text{binary64}} \]
  2. Final simplification100.0%

    \[\leadsto \langle \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right) \rangle_{\text{binary64}} \]

Alternative 2: 99.2% accurate, 0.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \langle \left( \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right) \right)_{\text{binary64}} \rangle_{\text{binary32}} \cdot \left(-s\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  (cast
   (!
    :precision
    binary64
    (log
     (+
      -1.0
      (/
       1.0
       (-
        (/ u (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI (- s)))))
        (/ (+ u -1.0) (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))))))
  (- s)))
float code(float u, float s) {
	double tmp = log((-1.0 + (1.0 / ((((double) u) / (1.0 + exp((((double) M_PI) / -((double) s))))) - ((((double) u) + -1.0) / (1.0 + exp((((double) M_PI) / ((double) s)))))))));
	return ((float) tmp) * -s;
}
function code(u, s)
	tmp = log(Float64(-1.0 + Float64(1.0 / Float64(Float64(Float64(u) / Float64(1.0 + exp(Float64(pi / Float64(-Float64(s)))))) - Float64(Float64(Float64(u) + -1.0) / Float64(1.0 + exp(Float64(pi / Float64(s)))))))))
	return Float32(Float32(tmp) * Float32(-s))
end
function tmp_2 = code(u, s)
	tmp = log((-1.0 + (1.0 / ((double(u) / (1.0 + exp((pi / -s)))) - ((double(u) + -1.0) / (1.0 + exp((pi / double(s)))))))));
	tmp_2 = single((single(tmp) * double(-s)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\langle \left( \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right) \right)_{\text{binary64}} \rangle_{\text{binary32}} \cdot \left(-s\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Step-by-step derivation
    1. rewrite-binary32/binary6499.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\langle \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right) \rangle_{\text{binary64}}\right)} \]
  4. Applied rewrite-once99.1%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\langle \color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \rangle_{\text{binary64}}}\right) \]
  5. Final simplification99.1%

    \[\leadsto \langle \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right) \rangle_{\text{binary64}} \cdot \left(-s\right) \]

Alternative 3: 99.0% accurate, 0.7× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\ s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1 - {t_0}^{-2}}{-1 + \frac{-1}{t_0}}\right)\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0
         (-
          (/ u (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI (- s)))))
          (/ (+ u -1.0) (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))))
   (* s (- (log (/ (- 1.0 (pow t_0 -2.0)) (+ -1.0 (/ -1.0 t_0))))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float t_0 = (u / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / -s)))) - ((u + -1.0f) / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s))));
	return s * -logf(((1.0f - powf(t_0, -2.0f)) / (-1.0f + (-1.0f / t_0))));
}
function code(u, s)
	t_0 = Float32(Float32(u / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / Float32(-s))))) - Float32(Float32(u + Float32(-1.0)) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s)))))
	return Float32(s * Float32(-log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) - (t_0 ^ Float32(-2.0))) / Float32(Float32(-1.0) + Float32(Float32(-1.0) / t_0))))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	t_0 = (u / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / -s)))) - ((u + single(-1.0)) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s))));
	tmp = s * -log(((single(1.0) - (t_0 ^ single(-2.0))) / (single(-1.0) + (single(-1.0) / t_0))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\
s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1 - {t_0}^{-2}}{-1 + \frac{-1}{t_0}}\right)\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Taylor expanded in s around 0 98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{u}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) - \frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)\right)} \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate-*r*98.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{u}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) - \frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)} \]
    2. neg-mul-198.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right)} \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{u}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) - \frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
    3. sub-neg98.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{u}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) - \frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]
  5. Simplified98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \left(\frac{u}{1 + e^{-\frac{\pi}{s}}} - \frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right)} + -1\right)} \]
  6. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative98.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \left(\frac{u}{1 + e^{-\frac{\pi}{s}}} - \frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right)}\right)} \]
    2. flip-+98.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{-1 \cdot -1 - \frac{1}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \left(\frac{u}{1 + e^{-\frac{\pi}{s}}} - \frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right)} \cdot \frac{1}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \left(\frac{u}{1 + e^{-\frac{\pi}{s}}} - \frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right)}}{-1 - \frac{1}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \left(\frac{u}{1 + e^{-\frac{\pi}{s}}} - \frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right)}}\right)} \]
  7. Applied egg-rr98.9%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1 - {\left(\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u - 1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right)}^{-2}}{-1 + \frac{-1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u - 1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}}\right)} \]
  8. Final simplification98.9%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1 - {\left(\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right)}^{-2}}{-1 + \frac{-1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}}\right)\right) \]

Alternative 4: 99.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := 1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{1}{t_0} + \left(\frac{u}{1 + e^{-\frac{\pi}{s}}} - \frac{u}{t_0}\right)}\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))
   (*
    (- s)
    (log
     (+
      -1.0
      (/
       1.0
       (+ (/ 1.0 t_0) (- (/ u (+ 1.0 (exp (- (/ PI s))))) (/ u t_0)))))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float t_0 = 1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s));
	return -s * logf((-1.0f + (1.0f / ((1.0f / t_0) + ((u / (1.0f + expf(-(((float) M_PI) / s)))) - (u / t_0))))));
}
function code(u, s)
	t_0 = Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s)))
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(-1.0) + Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / t_0) + Float32(Float32(u / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(-Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))) - Float32(u / t_0)))))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	t_0 = single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s));
	tmp = -s * log((single(-1.0) + (single(1.0) / ((single(1.0) / t_0) + ((u / (single(1.0) + exp(-(single(pi) / s)))) - (u / t_0))))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := 1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{1}{t_0} + \left(\frac{u}{1 + e^{-\frac{\pi}{s}}} - \frac{u}{t_0}\right)}\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Taylor expanded in s around 0 98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{u}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) - \frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)\right)} \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate-*r*98.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{u}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) - \frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)} \]
    2. neg-mul-198.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right)} \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{u}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) - \frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
    3. sub-neg98.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{u}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) - \frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]
  5. Simplified98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \left(\frac{u}{1 + e^{-\frac{\pi}{s}}} - \frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right)} + -1\right)} \]
  6. Final simplification98.9%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \left(\frac{u}{1 + e^{-\frac{\pi}{s}}} - \frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right)}\right) \]

Alternative 5: 99.0% accurate, 1.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{1}{\frac{s}{\pi}}}}}\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  (- s)
  (log
   (+
    -1.0
    (/
     1.0
     (-
      (/ u (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI (- s)))))
      (/ (+ u -1.0) (+ 1.0 (exp (/ 1.0 (/ s PI)))))))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -s * logf((-1.0f + (1.0f / ((u / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / -s)))) - ((u + -1.0f) / (1.0f + expf((1.0f / (s / ((float) M_PI))))))))));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(-1.0) + Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / Float32(-s))))) - Float32(Float32(u + Float32(-1.0)) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(s / Float32(pi)))))))))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = -s * log((single(-1.0) + (single(1.0) / ((u / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / -s)))) - ((u + single(-1.0)) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(1.0) / (s / single(pi))))))))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{1}{\frac{s}{\pi}}}}}\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Step-by-step derivation
    1. clear-num98.8%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{s}{\pi}}}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
    2. inv-pow98.8%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{{\left(\frac{s}{\pi}\right)}^{-1}}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  4. Applied egg-rr98.8%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{{\left(\frac{s}{\pi}\right)}^{-1}}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. unpow-198.8%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{s}{\pi}}}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  6. Simplified98.8%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{s}{\pi}}}}}} + -1\right)\right) \]
  7. Final simplification98.8%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{1}{\frac{s}{\pi}}}}}\right) \]

Alternative 6: 99.0% accurate, 1.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  (- s)
  (log
   (+
    -1.0
    (/
     1.0
     (-
      (/ u (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI (- s)))))
      (/ (+ u -1.0) (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -s * logf((-1.0f + (1.0f / ((u / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / -s)))) - ((u + -1.0f) / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s))))))));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(-1.0) + Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / Float32(-s))))) - Float32(Float32(u + Float32(-1.0)) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s)))))))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = -s * log((single(-1.0) + (single(1.0) / ((u / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / -s)))) - ((u + single(-1.0)) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s))))))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Final simplification98.8%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right) \]

Alternative 7: 24.9% accurate, 1.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, \frac{\pi \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(u, -0.25, \mathsf{fma}\left(u, -0.25, 0.25\right)\right)}{s}, 1\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (* s (- (log (fma 4.0 (/ (* PI (fma u -0.25 (fma u -0.25 0.25))) s) 1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * -logf(fmaf(4.0f, ((((float) M_PI) * fmaf(u, -0.25f, fmaf(u, -0.25f, 0.25f))) / s), 1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(-log(fma(Float32(4.0), Float32(Float32(Float32(pi) * fma(u, Float32(-0.25), fma(u, Float32(-0.25), Float32(0.25)))) / s), Float32(1.0)))))
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, \frac{\pi \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(u, -0.25, \mathsf{fma}\left(u, -0.25, 0.25\right)\right)}{s}, 1\right)\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Taylor expanded in s around 0 98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{u}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) - \frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)\right)} \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate-*r*98.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{u}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) - \frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)} \]
    2. neg-mul-198.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right)} \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{u}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) - \frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
    3. sub-neg98.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{u}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) - \frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]
  5. Simplified98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \left(\frac{u}{1 + e^{-\frac{\pi}{s}}} - \frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right)} + -1\right)} \]
  6. Taylor expanded in s around -inf 24.9%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + 4 \cdot \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{s}\right)} \]
  7. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative24.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(4 \cdot \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{s} + 1\right)} \]
    2. fma-def24.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{s}, 1\right)\right)} \]
  8. Simplified24.9%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, \frac{\pi \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(u, -0.25, \mathsf{fma}\left(u, -0.25, 0.25\right)\right)}{s}, 1\right)\right)} \]
  9. Final simplification24.9%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, \frac{\pi \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(u, -0.25, \mathsf{fma}\left(u, -0.25, 0.25\right)\right)}{s}, 1\right)\right)\right) \]

Alternative 8: 24.9% accurate, 2.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(1 + -4 \cdot \left(\frac{\pi}{s} \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.25 - \mathsf{fma}\left(u, -0.25, 0.25\right)\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  (- s)
  (log (+ 1.0 (* -4.0 (* (/ PI s) (- (* u 0.25) (fma u -0.25 0.25))))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -s * logf((1.0f + (-4.0f * ((((float) M_PI) / s) * ((u * 0.25f) - fmaf(u, -0.25f, 0.25f))))));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(1.0) + Float32(Float32(-4.0) * Float32(Float32(Float32(pi) / s) * Float32(Float32(u * Float32(0.25)) - fma(u, Float32(-0.25), Float32(0.25))))))))
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(1 + -4 \cdot \left(\frac{\pi}{s} \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.25 - \mathsf{fma}\left(u, -0.25, 0.25\right)\right)\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Taylor expanded in s around 0 98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{u}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) - \frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)\right)} \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate-*r*98.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{u}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) - \frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)} \]
    2. neg-mul-198.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right)} \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{u}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) - \frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
    3. sub-neg98.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{u}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) - \frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]
  5. Simplified98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \left(\frac{u}{1 + e^{-\frac{\pi}{s}}} - \frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right)} + -1\right)} \]
  6. Taylor expanded in s around inf 24.9%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + -4 \cdot \frac{0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)}{s}\right)} \]
  7. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-commutative24.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(1 + -4 \cdot \frac{0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(\color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot -0.25} + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)}{s}\right) \]
    2. *-commutative24.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(1 + -4 \cdot \frac{0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(\color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot u\right)} \cdot -0.25 + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)}{s}\right) \]
    3. associate-*r*24.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(1 + -4 \cdot \frac{0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(\color{blue}{\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25\right)} + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)}{s}\right) \]
    4. *-commutative24.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(1 + -4 \cdot \frac{0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(\color{blue}{\left(u \cdot -0.25\right) \cdot \pi} + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)}{s}\right) \]
    5. distribute-rgt-in24.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(1 + -4 \cdot \frac{0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right)}}{s}\right) \]
    6. fma-def24.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(1 + -4 \cdot \frac{0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \pi \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(u, -0.25, 0.25\right)}}{s}\right) \]
    7. *-commutative24.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(1 + -4 \cdot \frac{0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(u, -0.25, 0.25\right) \cdot \pi}}{s}\right) \]
    8. cancel-sign-sub-inv24.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(1 + -4 \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + \left(-\mathsf{fma}\left(u, -0.25, 0.25\right)\right) \cdot \pi}}{s}\right) \]
    9. associate-*r*24.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(1 + -4 \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\left(0.25 \cdot u\right) \cdot \pi} + \left(-\mathsf{fma}\left(u, -0.25, 0.25\right)\right) \cdot \pi}{s}\right) \]
    10. *-commutative24.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(1 + -4 \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\left(u \cdot 0.25\right)} \cdot \pi + \left(-\mathsf{fma}\left(u, -0.25, 0.25\right)\right) \cdot \pi}{s}\right) \]
    11. distribute-rgt-out24.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(1 + -4 \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.25 + \left(-\mathsf{fma}\left(u, -0.25, 0.25\right)\right)\right)}}{s}\right) \]
    12. sub-neg24.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(1 + -4 \cdot \frac{\pi \cdot \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot 0.25 - \mathsf{fma}\left(u, -0.25, 0.25\right)\right)}}{s}\right) \]
  8. Simplified24.9%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + -4 \cdot \left(\frac{\pi}{s} \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.25 - \mathsf{fma}\left(u, -0.25, 0.25\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]
  9. Final simplification24.9%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(1 + -4 \cdot \left(\frac{\pi}{s} \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.25 - \mathsf{fma}\left(u, -0.25, 0.25\right)\right)\right)\right) \]

Alternative 9: 24.9% accurate, 3.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(-\log \left(1 + \left(\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 + u \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \cdot \frac{-4}{s}\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (* s (- (log (+ 1.0 (* (* PI (+ -0.25 (* u 0.5))) (/ -4.0 s)))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * -logf((1.0f + ((((float) M_PI) * (-0.25f + (u * 0.5f))) * (-4.0f / s))));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(-log(Float32(Float32(1.0) + Float32(Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(Float32(-0.25) + Float32(u * Float32(0.5)))) * Float32(Float32(-4.0) / s))))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * -log((single(1.0) + ((single(pi) * (single(-0.25) + (u * single(0.5)))) * (single(-4.0) / s))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(-\log \left(1 + \left(\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 + u \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \cdot \frac{-4}{s}\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Taylor expanded in s around 0 98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{u}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) - \frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)\right)} \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate-*r*98.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{u}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) - \frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)} \]
    2. neg-mul-198.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right)} \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{u}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) - \frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
    3. sub-neg98.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{u}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) - \frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]
  5. Simplified98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \left(\frac{u}{1 + e^{-\frac{\pi}{s}}} - \frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right)} + -1\right)} \]
  6. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative98.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \left(\frac{u}{1 + e^{-\frac{\pi}{s}}} - \frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right)}\right)} \]
    2. flip-+98.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{-1 \cdot -1 - \frac{1}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \left(\frac{u}{1 + e^{-\frac{\pi}{s}}} - \frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right)} \cdot \frac{1}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \left(\frac{u}{1 + e^{-\frac{\pi}{s}}} - \frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right)}}{-1 - \frac{1}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \left(\frac{u}{1 + e^{-\frac{\pi}{s}}} - \frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right)}}\right)} \]
  7. Applied egg-rr98.9%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1 - {\left(\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u - 1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right)}^{-2}}{-1 + \frac{-1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u - 1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}}\right)} \]
  8. Taylor expanded in s around inf 24.9%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot \frac{5.333333333333333 \cdot \left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)\right) - 1.3333333333333333 \cdot \left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{s}\right)} \]
  9. Simplified24.8%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.5 + -0.25\right)\right) \cdot \frac{-4}{s}\right)} \]
  10. Final simplification24.8%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(1 + \left(\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 + u \cdot 0.5\right)\right) \cdot \frac{-4}{s}\right)\right) \]

Alternative 10: 24.9% accurate, 3.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(-\log \left(1 - \frac{4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 + u \cdot 0.5\right)\right)}{s}\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (* s (- (log (- 1.0 (/ (* 4.0 (* PI (+ -0.25 (* u 0.5)))) s))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * -logf((1.0f - ((4.0f * (((float) M_PI) * (-0.25f + (u * 0.5f)))) / s)));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(-log(Float32(Float32(1.0) - Float32(Float32(Float32(4.0) * Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(Float32(-0.25) + Float32(u * Float32(0.5))))) / s)))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * -log((single(1.0) - ((single(4.0) * (single(pi) * (single(-0.25) + (u * single(0.5))))) / s)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(-\log \left(1 - \frac{4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 + u \cdot 0.5\right)\right)}{s}\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Taylor expanded in s around 0 98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{u}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) - \frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)\right)} \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate-*r*98.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{u}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) - \frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right)} \]
    2. neg-mul-198.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right)} \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{u}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) - \frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
    3. sub-neg98.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{\left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{u}{1 + e^{-1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) - \frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]
  5. Simplified98.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \left(\frac{u}{1 + e^{-\frac{\pi}{s}}} - \frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right)} + -1\right)} \]
  6. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative98.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \left(\frac{u}{1 + e^{-\frac{\pi}{s}}} - \frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right)}\right)} \]
    2. flip-+98.8%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{-1 \cdot -1 - \frac{1}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \left(\frac{u}{1 + e^{-\frac{\pi}{s}}} - \frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right)} \cdot \frac{1}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \left(\frac{u}{1 + e^{-\frac{\pi}{s}}} - \frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right)}}{-1 - \frac{1}{\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \left(\frac{u}{1 + e^{-\frac{\pi}{s}}} - \frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right)}}\right)} \]
  7. Applied egg-rr98.9%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1 - {\left(\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u - 1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right)}^{-2}}{-1 + \frac{-1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u - 1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}}\right)} \]
  8. Taylor expanded in s around inf 24.9%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot \frac{5.333333333333333 \cdot \left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)\right) - 1.3333333333333333 \cdot \left(0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{s}\right)} \]
  9. Simplified24.9%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \frac{-4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.5 + -0.25\right)\right)}{s}\right)} \]
  10. Final simplification24.9%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(1 - \frac{4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 + u \cdot 0.5\right)\right)}{s}\right)\right) \]

Alternative 11: 11.5% accurate, 6.5× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.25 - \left(0.25 + u \cdot -0.25\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (* 4.0 (* PI (- (* u 0.25) (+ 0.25 (* u -0.25))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return 4.0f * (((float) M_PI) * ((u * 0.25f) - (0.25f + (u * -0.25f))));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(4.0) * Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(Float32(u * Float32(0.25)) - Float32(Float32(0.25) + Float32(u * Float32(-0.25))))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = single(4.0) * (single(pi) * ((u * single(0.25)) - (single(0.25) + (u * single(-0.25)))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.25 - \left(0.25 + u \cdot -0.25\right)\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Step-by-step derivation
    1. add-exp-log_binary3295.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-e^{\log \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)}\right)} \]
  4. Applied rewrite-once95.1%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{e^{\log \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)}}\right) \]
  5. Taylor expanded in s around inf 11.1%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{-4 \cdot \frac{0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)}{s}}\right) \]
  6. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative11.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(--4 \cdot \frac{0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \color{blue}{\left(0.25 \cdot \pi + -0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}}{s}\right) \]
    2. *-commutative11.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(--4 \cdot \frac{0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(\color{blue}{\pi \cdot 0.25} + -0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{s}\right) \]
    3. associate-*r*11.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(--4 \cdot \frac{0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(\pi \cdot 0.25 + \color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot u\right) \cdot \pi}\right)}{s}\right) \]
    4. *-commutative11.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(--4 \cdot \frac{0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(\pi \cdot 0.25 + \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot -0.25\right)} \cdot \pi\right)}{s}\right) \]
    5. *-commutative11.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(--4 \cdot \frac{0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(\pi \cdot 0.25 + \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25\right)}\right)}{s}\right) \]
    6. associate-*r*11.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(--4 \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\left(0.25 \cdot u\right) \cdot \pi} - \left(\pi \cdot 0.25 + \pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25\right)\right)}{s}\right) \]
    7. +-commutative11.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(--4 \cdot \frac{\left(0.25 \cdot u\right) \cdot \pi - \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25\right) + \pi \cdot 0.25\right)}}{s}\right) \]
    8. distribute-lft-in11.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(--4 \cdot \frac{\left(0.25 \cdot u\right) \cdot \pi - \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right)}}{s}\right) \]
    9. *-commutative11.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(--4 \cdot \frac{\left(0.25 \cdot u\right) \cdot \pi - \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right) \cdot \pi}}{s}\right) \]
    10. distribute-rgt-out--11.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(--4 \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\pi \cdot \left(0.25 \cdot u - \left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right)\right)}}{s}\right) \]
    11. *-commutative11.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(--4 \cdot \frac{\pi \cdot \left(\color{blue}{u \cdot 0.25} - \left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right)\right)}{s}\right) \]
    12. fma-def11.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(--4 \cdot \frac{\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.25 - \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(u, -0.25, 0.25\right)}\right)}{s}\right) \]
  7. Simplified11.1%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{-4 \cdot \frac{\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.25 - \mathsf{fma}\left(u, -0.25, 0.25\right)\right)}{s}}\right) \]
  8. Taylor expanded in s around 0 11.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(0.25 \cdot u - \left(0.25 + -0.25 \cdot u\right)\right)\right)} \]
  9. Final simplification11.1%

    \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot 0.25 - \left(0.25 + u \cdot -0.25\right)\right)\right) \]

Alternative 12: 11.5% accurate, 6.9× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \pi \cdot \left(-1 + u \cdot 2\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (* PI (+ -1.0 (* u 2.0))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return ((float) M_PI) * (-1.0f + (u * 2.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(Float32(-1.0) + Float32(u * Float32(2.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = single(pi) * (single(-1.0) + (u * single(2.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\pi \cdot \left(-1 + u \cdot 2\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Taylor expanded in s around -inf 11.1%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{4 \cdot \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{s}}\right) \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate-*r/11.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{4 \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)\right)}{s}}\right) \]
    2. associate--r+11.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\frac{4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) - 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}}{s}\right) \]
    3. cancel-sign-sub-inv11.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\frac{4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}}{s}\right) \]
    4. cancel-sign-sub-inv11.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\frac{4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + \left(--0.25\right) \cdot \pi\right)} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{s}\right) \]
    5. metadata-eval11.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\frac{4 \cdot \left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + \color{blue}{0.25} \cdot \pi\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{s}\right) \]
    6. associate-*r*11.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\frac{4 \cdot \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot u\right) \cdot \pi} + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{s}\right) \]
    7. distribute-rgt-out11.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\frac{4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot u + 0.25\right)} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{s}\right) \]
    8. *-commutative11.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\frac{4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(\color{blue}{u \cdot -0.25} + 0.25\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{s}\right) \]
    9. metadata-eval11.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\frac{4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right) + \color{blue}{-0.25} \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)}{s}\right) \]
    10. associate-*r*11.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\frac{4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot u\right) \cdot \pi}\right)}{s}\right) \]
    11. *-commutative11.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\frac{4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right) + \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot u\right)}\right)}{s}\right) \]
    12. *-commutative11.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\frac{4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right) + \pi \cdot \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot -0.25\right)}\right)}{s}\right) \]
  5. Simplified11.1%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right) + \pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25\right)\right)}{s}}\right) \]
  6. Taylor expanded in u around 0 11.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \pi + 2 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)} \]
  7. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate-*r*11.1%

      \[\leadsto -1 \cdot \pi + \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot u\right) \cdot \pi} \]
    2. distribute-rgt-out11.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \left(-1 + 2 \cdot u\right)} \]
    3. *-commutative11.1%

      \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \left(-1 + \color{blue}{u \cdot 2}\right) \]
  8. Simplified11.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \left(-1 + u \cdot 2\right)} \]
  9. Final simplification11.1%

    \[\leadsto \pi \cdot \left(-1 + u \cdot 2\right) \]

Alternative 13: 11.3% accurate, 7.2× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -\pi \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (- PI))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -((float) M_PI);
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(-Float32(pi))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = -single(pi);
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
-\pi
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.9%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} - \frac{u + -1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
  3. Taylor expanded in u around 0 10.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \pi} \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. neg-mul-110.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\pi} \]
  5. Simplified10.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\pi} \]
  6. Final simplification10.8%

    \[\leadsto -\pi \]

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2023297 
(FPCore (u s)
  :name "Sample trimmed logistic on [-pi, pi]"
  :precision binary32
  :pre (and (and (<= 2.328306437e-10 u) (<= u 1.0)) (and (<= 0.0 s) (<= s 1.0651631)))
  (* (- s) (log (- (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))) (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))) 1.0))))