Logistic regression 2

Percentage Accurate: 99.4% → 99.4%

Time: 5.6s

Alternatives: 8

Speedup: 1.8×

• could not determine a ground truth

  1. x = 3.4559021227484276e+39
  2. y = -1.5654696984659242e-167

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \log \left(1 + e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (- (log (+ 1.0 (exp x))) (* x y)))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return log((1.0 + exp(x))) - (x * y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = log((1.0d0 + exp(x))) - (x * y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return Math.log((1.0 + Math.exp(x))) - (x * y);
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return math.log((1.0 + math.exp(x))) - (x * y)

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(log(Float64(1.0 + exp(x))) - Float64(x * y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = log((1.0 + exp(x))) - (x * y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(N[Log[N[(1.0 + N[Exp[x], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.4% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \log \left(1 + e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (- (log (+ 1.0 (exp x))) (* x y)))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return log((1.0 + exp(x))) - (x * y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = log((1.0d0 + exp(x))) - (x * y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return Math.log((1.0 + Math.exp(x))) - (x * y);
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return math.log((1.0 + math.exp(x))) - (x * y)

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(log(Float64(1.0 + exp(x))) - Float64(x * y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = log((1.0 + exp(x))) - (x * y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(N[Log[N[(1.0 + N[Exp[x], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.4% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -32:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(-y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log 2 + x \cdot \left(x \cdot 0.125 + \left(0.5 - y\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -32.0) (* x (- y)) (+ (log 2.0) (* x (+ (* x 0.125) (- 0.5 y))))))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -32.0) {
		tmp = x * -y;
	} else {
		tmp = log(2.0) + (x * ((x * 0.125) + (0.5 - y)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-32.0d0)) then
        tmp = x * -y
    else
        tmp = log(2.0d0) + (x * ((x * 0.125d0) + (0.5d0 - y)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -32.0) {
		tmp = x * -y;
	} else {
		tmp = Math.log(2.0) + (x * ((x * 0.125) + (0.5 - y)));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -32.0:
		tmp = x * -y
	else:
		tmp = math.log(2.0) + (x * ((x * 0.125) + (0.5 - y)))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -32.0)
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(-y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(log(2.0) + Float64(x * Float64(Float64(x * 0.125) + Float64(0.5 - y))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -32.0)
		tmp = x * -y;
	else
		tmp = log(2.0) + (x * ((x * 0.125) + (0.5 - y)));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[LessEqual[x, -32.0], N[(x * (-y)), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[Log[2.0], $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * N[(N[(x * 0.125), $MachinePrecision] + N[(0.5 - y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -32

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\log \left(1 + e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. log1p-def 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{x}\right)} - x \cdot y \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot x\right) \cdot y} \]

      2. neg-mul-1 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-x\right)} \cdot y \]

      3. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-x\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-x\right)} \]

   if -32 < x

   1. Initial program 99.5%

      \[\log \left(1 + e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. log1p-def 99.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{x}\right)} - x \cdot y \]

   3. Simplified 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log 2 + \left(0.125 \cdot {x}^{2} + x \cdot \left(0.5 - y\right)\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \log 2 + \left(\color{blue}{{x}^{2} \cdot 0.125} + x \cdot \left(0.5 - y\right)\right) \]

      2. unpow2 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \log 2 + \left(\color{blue}{\left(x \cdot x\right)} \cdot 0.125 + x \cdot \left(0.5 - y\right)\right) \]

      3. associate-*l* 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \log 2 + \left(\color{blue}{x \cdot \left(x \cdot 0.125\right)} + x \cdot \left(0.5 - y\right)\right) \]

      4. distribute-lft-out 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \log 2 + \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(x \cdot 0.125 + \left(0.5 - y\right)\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log 2 + x \cdot \left(x \cdot 0.125 + \left(0.5 - y\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -32:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(-y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log 2 + x \cdot \left(x \cdot 0.125 + \left(0.5 - y\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 2: 99.4% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (- (log1p (exp x)) (* x y)))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return log1p(exp(x)) - (x * y);
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return Math.log1p(Math.exp(x)) - (x * y);
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return math.log1p(math.exp(x)) - (x * y)

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(log1p(exp(x)) - Float64(x * y))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(N[Log[1 + N[Exp[x], $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.7%

   \[\log \left(1 + e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. log1p-def 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{x}\right)} - x \cdot y \]

3. Simplified 99.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y} \]

4. Final simplification 99.7%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y \]

Alternative 3: 82.7% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -0.0073 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 7.2 \cdot 10^{-53}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(-y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log 2 + x \cdot 0.5\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -0.0073) (not (<= x 7.2e-53)))
   (* x (- y))
   (+ (log 2.0) (* x 0.5))))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -0.0073) || !(x <= 7.2e-53)) {
		tmp = x * -y;
	} else {
		tmp = log(2.0) + (x * 0.5);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-0.0073d0)) .or. (.not. (x <= 7.2d-53))) then
        tmp = x * -y
    else
        tmp = log(2.0d0) + (x * 0.5d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -0.0073) || !(x <= 7.2e-53)) {
		tmp = x * -y;
	} else {
		tmp = Math.log(2.0) + (x * 0.5);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -0.0073) or not (x <= 7.2e-53):
		tmp = x * -y
	else:
		tmp = math.log(2.0) + (x * 0.5)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -0.0073) || !(x <= 7.2e-53))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(-y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(log(2.0) + Float64(x * 0.5));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -0.0073) || ~((x <= 7.2e-53)))
		tmp = x * -y;
	else
		tmp = log(2.0) + (x * 0.5);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -0.0073], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 7.2e-53]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * (-y)), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[Log[2.0], $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -0.00730000000000000007 or 7.1999999999999998e-53 < x

   1. Initial program 99.2%

      \[\log \left(1 + e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. log1p-def 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{x}\right)} - x \cdot y \]

   3. Simplified 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 93.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 93.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot x\right) \cdot y} \]

      2. neg-mul-1 93.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-x\right)} \cdot y \]

      3. *-commutative 93.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-x\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 93.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-x\right)} \]

   if -0.00730000000000000007 < x < 7.1999999999999998e-53

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\log \left(1 + e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. log1p-def 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{x}\right)} - x \cdot y \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log 2 + x \cdot \left(0.5 - y\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 79.5%

      \[\leadsto \log 2 + \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot x} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 79.5%

         \[\leadsto \log 2 + \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.5} \]

   7. Simplified 79.5%

      \[\leadsto \log 2 + \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.5} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 85.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -0.0073 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 7.2 \cdot 10^{-53}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(-y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log 2 + x \cdot 0.5\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 99.2% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -18:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(-y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log 2 + x \cdot \left(0.5 - y\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -18.0) (* x (- y)) (+ (log 2.0) (* x (- 0.5 y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -18.0) {
		tmp = x * -y;
	} else {
		tmp = log(2.0) + (x * (0.5 - y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-18.0d0)) then
        tmp = x * -y
    else
        tmp = log(2.0d0) + (x * (0.5d0 - y))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -18.0) {
		tmp = x * -y;
	} else {
		tmp = Math.log(2.0) + (x * (0.5 - y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -18.0:
		tmp = x * -y
	else:
		tmp = math.log(2.0) + (x * (0.5 - y))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -18.0)
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(-y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(log(2.0) + Float64(x * Float64(0.5 - y)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -18.0)
		tmp = x * -y;
	else
		tmp = log(2.0) + (x * (0.5 - y));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[LessEqual[x, -18.0], N[(x * (-y)), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[Log[2.0], $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * N[(0.5 - y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -18

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\log \left(1 + e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. log1p-def 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{x}\right)} - x \cdot y \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot x\right) \cdot y} \]

      2. neg-mul-1 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-x\right)} \cdot y \]

      3. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-x\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-x\right)} \]

   if -18 < x

   1. Initial program 99.5%

      \[\log \left(1 + e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. log1p-def 99.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{x}\right)} - x \cdot y \]

   3. Simplified 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log 2 + x \cdot \left(0.5 - y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -18:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(-y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log 2 + x \cdot \left(0.5 - y\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 98.8% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -24.5:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(-y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log 2 - x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -24.5) (* x (- y)) (- (log 2.0) (* x y))))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -24.5) {
		tmp = x * -y;
	} else {
		tmp = log(2.0) - (x * y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-24.5d0)) then
        tmp = x * -y
    else
        tmp = log(2.0d0) - (x * y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -24.5) {
		tmp = x * -y;
	} else {
		tmp = Math.log(2.0) - (x * y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -24.5:
		tmp = x * -y
	else:
		tmp = math.log(2.0) - (x * y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -24.5)
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(-y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(log(2.0) - Float64(x * y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -24.5)
		tmp = x * -y;
	else
		tmp = log(2.0) - (x * y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[LessEqual[x, -24.5], N[(x * (-y)), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[Log[2.0], $MachinePrecision] - N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -24.5

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\log \left(1 + e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. log1p-def 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{x}\right)} - x \cdot y \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot x\right) \cdot y} \]

      2. neg-mul-1 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-x\right)} \cdot y \]

      3. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-x\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-x\right)} \]

   if -24.5 < x

   1. Initial program 99.5%

      \[\log \left(1 + e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. log1p-def 99.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{x}\right)} - x \cdot y \]

   3. Simplified 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log 2} - x \cdot y \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -24.5:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(-y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log 2 - x \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6: 82.6% accurate, 2.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -5.5 \cdot 10^{-11} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 5.6 \cdot 10^{-56}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(-y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log 2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -5.5e-11) (not (<= x 5.6e-56))) (* x (- y)) (log 2.0)))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -5.5e-11) || !(x <= 5.6e-56)) {
		tmp = x * -y;
	} else {
		tmp = log(2.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-5.5d-11)) .or. (.not. (x <= 5.6d-56))) then
        tmp = x * -y
    else
        tmp = log(2.0d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -5.5e-11) || !(x <= 5.6e-56)) {
		tmp = x * -y;
	} else {
		tmp = Math.log(2.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -5.5e-11) or not (x <= 5.6e-56):
		tmp = x * -y
	else:
		tmp = math.log(2.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -5.5e-11) || !(x <= 5.6e-56))
		tmp = Float64(x * Float64(-y));
	else
		tmp = log(2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -5.5e-11) || ~((x <= 5.6e-56)))
		tmp = x * -y;
	else
		tmp = log(2.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -5.5e-11], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 5.6e-56]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x * (-y)), $MachinePrecision], N[Log[2.0], $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -5.49999999999999975e-11 or 5.59999999999999986e-56 < x

   1. Initial program 99.2%

      \[\log \left(1 + e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. log1p-def 99.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{x}\right)} - x \cdot y \]

   3. Simplified 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 91.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 91.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot x\right) \cdot y} \]

      2. neg-mul-1 91.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-x\right)} \cdot y \]

      3. *-commutative 91.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-x\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 91.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-x\right)} \]

   if -5.49999999999999975e-11 < x < 5.59999999999999986e-56

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\log \left(1 + e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. log1p-def 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{x}\right)} - x \cdot y \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log 2} - x \cdot y \]

   5. Taylor expanded in x around 0 80.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log 2} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 85.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -5.5 \cdot 10^{-11} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 5.6 \cdot 10^{-56}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot \left(-y\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log 2\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 7: 53.7% accurate, 51.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot \left(-y\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (* x (- y)))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return x * -y;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = x * -y
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return x * -y;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return x * -y

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(x * Float64(-y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = x * -y;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(x * (-y)), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.7%

   \[\log \left(1 + e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. log1p-def 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{x}\right)} - x \cdot y \]

3. Simplified 99.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y} \]

4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 50.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot y\right)} \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-*r* 50.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot x\right) \cdot y} \]

   2. neg-mul-1 50.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-x\right)} \cdot y \]

   3. *-commutative 50.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-x\right)} \]

6. Simplified 50.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-x\right)} \]

7. Final simplification 50.4%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot \left(-y\right) \]

Alternative 8: 3.6% accurate, 69.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \cdot 0.5 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y) :precision binary64 (* x 0.5))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	return x * 0.5;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    code = x * 0.5d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	return x * 0.5;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	return x * 0.5

Julia

function code(x, y)
	return Float64(x * 0.5)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y)
	tmp = x * 0.5;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := N[(x * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.7%

   \[\log \left(1 + e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. log1p-def 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{x}\right)} - x \cdot y \]

3. Simplified 99.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y} \]

4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 86.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log 2 + x \cdot \left(0.5 - y\right)} \]

5. Taylor expanded in y around 0 51.7%

   \[\leadsto \log 2 + \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot x} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 51.7%

      \[\leadsto \log 2 + \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.5} \]

7. Simplified 51.7%

   \[\leadsto \log 2 + \color{blue}{x \cdot 0.5} \]

8. Taylor expanded in x around inf 3.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot x} \]

9. Final simplification 3.7%

   \[\leadsto x \cdot 0.5 \]

Developer target: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq 0:\\ \;\;\;\;\log \left(1 + e^{x}\right) - x \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\log \left(1 + e^{-x}\right) - \left(-x\right) \cdot \left(1 - y\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x 0.0)
   (- (log (+ 1.0 (exp x))) (* x y))
   (- (log (+ 1.0 (exp (- x)))) (* (- x) (- 1.0 y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= 0.0) {
		tmp = log((1.0 + exp(x))) - (x * y);
	} else {
		tmp = log((1.0 + exp(-x))) - (-x * (1.0 - y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= 0.0d0) then
        tmp = log((1.0d0 + exp(x))) - (x * y)
    else
        tmp = log((1.0d0 + exp(-x))) - (-x * (1.0d0 - y))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= 0.0) {
		tmp = Math.log((1.0 + Math.exp(x))) - (x * y);
	} else {
		tmp = Math.log((1.0 + Math.exp(-x))) - (-x * (1.0 - y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= 0.0:
		tmp = math.log((1.0 + math.exp(x))) - (x * y)
	else:
		tmp = math.log((1.0 + math.exp(-x))) - (-x * (1.0 - y))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= 0.0)
		tmp = Float64(log(Float64(1.0 + exp(x))) - Float64(x * y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(log(Float64(1.0 + exp(Float64(-x)))) - Float64(Float64(-x) * Float64(1.0 - y)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= 0.0)
		tmp = log((1.0 + exp(x))) - (x * y);
	else
		tmp = log((1.0 + exp(-x))) - (-x * (1.0 - y));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_] := If[LessEqual[x, 0.0], N[(N[Log[N[(1.0 + N[Exp[x], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[(x * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[Log[N[(1.0 + N[Exp[(-x)], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[((-x) * N[(1.0 - y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023293 
(FPCore (x y)
  :name "Logistic regression 2"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (if (<= x 0.0) (- (log (+ 1.0 (exp x))) (* x y)) (- (log (+ 1.0 (exp (- x)))) (* (- x) (- 1.0 y))))

  (- (log (+ 1.0 (exp x))) (* x y)))