Sample trimmed logistic on [-pi, pi]

Percentage Accurate: 98.9% → 98.9%
Time: 14.1s
Alternatives: 14
Speedup: 1.2×

Specification

?
\[\left(2.328306437 \cdot 10^{-10} \leq u \land u \leq 1\right) \land \left(0 \leq s \land s \leq 1.0651631\right)\]
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t_0\right) + t_0} - 1\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))
   (*
    (- s)
    (log
     (-
      (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) t_0)) t_0))
      1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float t_0 = 1.0f / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)));
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / ((u * ((1.0f / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - 1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	t_0 = Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - Float32(1.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	t_0 = single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)));
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / ((u * ((single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - single(1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t_0\right) + t_0} - 1\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary32 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 14 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 98.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t_0\right) + t_0} - 1\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))
   (*
    (- s)
    (log
     (-
      (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) t_0)) t_0))
      1.0)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	float t_0 = 1.0f / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)));
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / ((u * ((1.0f / (1.0f + expf((-((float) M_PI) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - 1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	t_0 = Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(-Float32(pi)) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - Float32(1.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	t_0 = single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)));
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / ((u * ((single(1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((-single(pi) / s)))) - t_0)) + t_0)) - single(1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - t_0\right) + t_0} - 1\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 98.9% accurate, 1.2× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + {e}^{\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}} + -1\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  (- s)
  (log
   (+
    (/
     1.0
     (+
      (/ u (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI (- s)))))
      (/ (- 1.0 u) (+ 1.0 (pow E (/ PI s))))))
    -1.0))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -s * logf(((1.0f / ((u / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / -s)))) + ((1.0f - u) / (1.0f + powf(((float) M_E), (((float) M_PI) / s)))))) + -1.0f));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / Float32(-s))))) + Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + (Float32(exp(1)) ^ Float32(Float32(pi) / s)))))) + Float32(-1.0))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = -s * log(((single(1.0) / ((u / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / -s)))) + ((single(1.0) - u) / (single(1.0) + (single(2.71828182845904523536) ^ (single(pi) / s)))))) + single(-1.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + {e}^{\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}} + -1\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.7%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.7%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-un-lft-identity98.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}}} + -1\right) \]
    2. exp-prod98.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{{\left(e^{1}\right)}^{\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}}} + -1\right) \]
    3. exp-1-e98.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + {\color{blue}{e}}^{\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}} + -1\right) \]
  4. Applied egg-rr98.7%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{{e}^{\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}}} + -1\right) \]
  5. Final simplification98.7%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + {e}^{\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}} + -1\right) \]

Alternative 2: 98.9% accurate, 1.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  (- s)
  (log
   (+
    -1.0
    (/
     1.0
     (+
      (/ u (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI (- s)))))
      (/ (- 1.0 u) (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s))))))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -s * logf((-1.0f + (1.0f / ((u / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / -s)))) + ((1.0f - u) / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s))))))));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(-1.0) + Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / Float32(-s))))) + Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s)))))))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = -s * log((single(-1.0) + (single(1.0) / ((u / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / -s)))) + ((single(1.0) - u) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s))))))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.7%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.7%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Final simplification98.7%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right) \]

Alternative 3: 86.3% accurate, 1.7× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  s
  (-
   (log
    (+
     -1.0
     (/
      1.0
      (+
       (/ u (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI (- s)))))
       (/ (- 1.0 u) (+ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (/ PI s)))))))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * -logf((-1.0f + (1.0f / ((u / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / -s)))) + ((1.0f - u) / (1.0f + (1.0f + (((float) M_PI) / s))))))));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(-log(Float32(Float32(-1.0) + Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(u / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / Float32(-s))))) + Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + Float32(Float32(1.0) + Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))))))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * -log((single(-1.0) + (single(1.0) / ((u / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / -s)))) + ((single(1.0) - u) / (single(1.0) + (single(1.0) + (single(pi) / s))))))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.7%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.7%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Taylor expanded in s around inf 84.7%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}} + -1\right) \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative36.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + 1} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{\pi}{s} + 1\right)}}}\right)\right) \]
  5. Simplified84.7%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{\pi}{s} + 1\right)}}} + -1\right) \]
  6. Final simplification84.7%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}\right)\right) \]

Alternative 4: 37.7% accurate, 1.7× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{1 - u}{1 + {e}^{\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}} + \frac{u}{2}}\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  s
  (-
   (log
    (+ -1.0 (/ 1.0 (+ (/ (- 1.0 u) (+ 1.0 (pow E (/ PI s)))) (/ u 2.0))))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * -logf((-1.0f + (1.0f / (((1.0f - u) / (1.0f + powf(((float) M_E), (((float) M_PI) / s)))) + (u / 2.0f)))));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(-log(Float32(Float32(-1.0) + Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + (Float32(exp(1)) ^ Float32(Float32(pi) / s)))) + Float32(u / Float32(2.0))))))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * -log((single(-1.0) + (single(1.0) / (((single(1.0) - u) / (single(1.0) + (single(2.71828182845904523536) ^ (single(pi) / s)))) + (u / single(2.0))))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{1 - u}{1 + {e}^{\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}} + \frac{u}{2}}\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.7%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.7%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Applied egg-rr6.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0 - s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. neg-sub06.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
    2. distribute-rgt-neg-in6.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
    3. +-commutative6.8%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)}\right) \]
  5. Simplified6.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)\right)} \]
  6. Taylor expanded in s around inf 38.2%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + \color{blue}{1}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)\right) \]
  7. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-un-lft-identity98.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}}} + -1\right) \]
    2. exp-prod98.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{{\left(e^{1}\right)}^{\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}}} + -1\right) \]
    3. exp-1-e98.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + {\color{blue}{e}}^{\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}} + -1\right) \]
  8. Applied egg-rr38.2%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + 1} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{{e}^{\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}}}\right)\right) \]
  9. Final simplification38.2%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{1 - u}{1 + {e}^{\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}} + \frac{u}{2}}\right)\right) \]

Alternative 5: 37.7% accurate, 2.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + u \cdot 0.5}\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  s
  (-
   (log (+ -1.0 (/ 1.0 (+ (/ (- 1.0 u) (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))) (* u 0.5))))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * -logf((-1.0f + (1.0f / (((1.0f - u) / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s)))) + (u * 0.5f)))));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(-log(Float32(Float32(-1.0) + Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s)))) + Float32(u * Float32(0.5))))))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * -log((single(-1.0) + (single(1.0) / (((single(1.0) - u) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s)))) + (u * single(0.5))))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + u \cdot 0.5}\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.7%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.7%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Applied egg-rr6.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0 - s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. neg-sub06.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
    2. distribute-rgt-neg-in6.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
    3. +-commutative6.8%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)}\right) \]
  5. Simplified6.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)\right)} \]
  6. Taylor expanded in s around inf 38.2%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + \color{blue}{1}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)\right) \]
  7. Step-by-step derivation
    1. distribute-rgt-neg-out38.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + 1} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)} \]
    2. div-inv38.2%

      \[\leadsto -s \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\color{blue}{u \cdot \frac{1}{1 + 1}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right) \]
    3. metadata-eval38.2%

      \[\leadsto -s \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{u \cdot \frac{1}{\color{blue}{2}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right) \]
    4. metadata-eval38.2%

      \[\leadsto -s \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{u \cdot \color{blue}{0.5} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right) \]
  8. Applied egg-rr38.2%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{u \cdot 0.5 + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)} \]
  9. Final simplification38.2%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + u \cdot 0.5}\right)\right) \]

Alternative 6: 37.2% accurate, 2.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{\frac{1}{u}}{0.5 + \frac{-1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  s
  (- (log (+ -1.0 (/ (/ 1.0 u) (+ 0.5 (/ -1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * -logf((-1.0f + ((1.0f / u) / (0.5f + (-1.0f / (1.0f + expf((((float) M_PI) / s))))))));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(-log(Float32(Float32(-1.0) + Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) / u) / Float32(Float32(0.5) + Float32(Float32(-1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + exp(Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))))))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * -log((single(-1.0) + ((single(1.0) / u) / (single(0.5) + (single(-1.0) / (single(1.0) + exp((single(pi) / s))))))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{\frac{1}{u}}{0.5 + \frac{-1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.7%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.7%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Applied egg-rr6.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0 - s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. neg-sub06.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
    2. distribute-rgt-neg-in6.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
    3. +-commutative6.8%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)}\right) \]
  5. Simplified6.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)\right)} \]
  6. Taylor expanded in s around inf 38.2%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + \color{blue}{1}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)\right) \]
  7. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-un-lft-identity98.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}}} + -1\right) \]
    2. exp-prod98.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{{\left(e^{1}\right)}^{\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}}} + -1\right) \]
    3. exp-1-e98.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + {\color{blue}{e}}^{\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}} + -1\right) \]
  8. Applied egg-rr38.2%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + 1} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{{e}^{\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}}}\right)\right) \]
  9. Taylor expanded in u around inf 37.1%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(0.5 - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi \cdot \log e}{s}}}\right)} - 1\right)}\right) \]
  10. Step-by-step derivation
    1. sub-neg37.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(0.5 - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi \cdot \log e}{s}}}\right)} + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) \]
    2. associate-/r*37.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{u}}{0.5 - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi \cdot \log e}{s}}}}} + \left(-1\right)\right)\right) \]
    3. log-E37.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{\frac{1}{u}}{0.5 - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi \cdot \color{blue}{1}}{s}}}} + \left(-1\right)\right)\right) \]
    4. *-commutative37.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{\frac{1}{u}}{0.5 - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\color{blue}{1 \cdot \pi}}{s}}}} + \left(-1\right)\right)\right) \]
    5. *-lft-identity37.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{\frac{1}{u}}{0.5 - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\color{blue}{\pi}}{s}}}} + \left(-1\right)\right)\right) \]
    6. metadata-eval37.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{\frac{1}{u}}{0.5 - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + \color{blue}{-1}\right)\right) \]
  11. Simplified37.1%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{\frac{1}{u}}{0.5 - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)}\right) \]
  12. Final simplification37.1%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{\frac{1}{u}}{0.5 + \frac{-1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)\right) \]

Alternative 7: 36.3% accurate, 3.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{1 - u}{1 + \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)} + \frac{u}{2}}\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (*
  (- s)
  (log (+ -1.0 (/ 1.0 (+ (/ (- 1.0 u) (+ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (/ PI s)))) (/ u 2.0)))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -s * logf((-1.0f + (1.0f / (((1.0f - u) / (1.0f + (1.0f + (((float) M_PI) / s)))) + (u / 2.0f)))));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(-1.0) + Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u) / Float32(Float32(1.0) + Float32(Float32(1.0) + Float32(Float32(pi) / s)))) + Float32(u / Float32(2.0)))))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = -s * log((single(-1.0) + (single(1.0) / (((single(1.0) - u) / (single(1.0) + (single(1.0) + (single(pi) / s)))) + (u / single(2.0))))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{1 - u}{1 + \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)} + \frac{u}{2}}\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.7%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.7%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Applied egg-rr6.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0 - s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. neg-sub06.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
    2. distribute-rgt-neg-in6.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
    3. +-commutative6.8%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)}\right) \]
  5. Simplified6.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)\right)} \]
  6. Taylor expanded in s around inf 38.2%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + \color{blue}{1}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)\right) \]
  7. Taylor expanded in s around inf 36.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + 1} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}}\right)\right) \]
  8. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative36.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + 1} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{\pi}{s} + 1\right)}}}\right)\right) \]
  9. Simplified36.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + 1} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{\pi}{s} + 1\right)}}}\right)\right) \]
  10. Final simplification36.0%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{1 - u}{1 + \left(1 + \frac{\pi}{s}\right)} + \frac{u}{2}}\right) \]

Alternative 8: 25.1% accurate, 3.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(1 + 4 \cdot \frac{\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right)}{s}\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (* (- s) (log (+ 1.0 (* 4.0 (/ (* PI (+ (* u -0.25) 0.25)) s))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -s * logf((1.0f + (4.0f * ((((float) M_PI) * ((u * -0.25f) + 0.25f)) / s))));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(-s) * log(Float32(Float32(1.0) + Float32(Float32(4.0) * Float32(Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(Float32(u * Float32(-0.25)) + Float32(0.25))) / s)))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = -s * log((single(1.0) + (single(4.0) * ((single(pi) * ((u * single(-0.25)) + single(0.25))) / s))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(1 + 4 \cdot \frac{\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right)}{s}\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.7%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.7%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Applied egg-rr6.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0 - s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. neg-sub06.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
    2. distribute-rgt-neg-in6.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
    3. +-commutative6.8%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)}\right) \]
  5. Simplified6.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)\right)} \]
  6. Taylor expanded in s around inf 38.2%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + \color{blue}{1}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)\right) \]
  7. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-un-lft-identity98.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\color{blue}{1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}}}}} + -1\right) \]
    2. exp-prod98.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{{\left(e^{1}\right)}^{\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}}} + -1\right) \]
    3. exp-1-e98.7%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + {\color{blue}{e}}^{\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}} + -1\right) \]
  8. Applied egg-rr38.2%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + 1} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{{e}^{\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}}}}\right)\right) \]
  9. Taylor expanded in s around -inf 25.4%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + 4 \cdot \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \log e\right)\right) - -0.25 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \log e\right)}{s}\right)}\right) \]
  10. Step-by-step derivation
    1. cancel-sign-sub-inv25.4%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(1 + 4 \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \log e\right)\right) + \left(--0.25\right) \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \log e\right)}}{s}\right)\right) \]
    2. metadata-eval25.4%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(1 + 4 \cdot \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \log e\right)\right) + \color{blue}{0.25} \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \log e\right)}{s}\right)\right) \]
    3. log-E25.4%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(1 + 4 \cdot \frac{-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \color{blue}{1}\right)\right) + 0.25 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \log e\right)}{s}\right)\right) \]
    4. associate-*r*25.4%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(1 + 4 \cdot \frac{-0.25 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 1\right)} + 0.25 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \log e\right)}{s}\right)\right) \]
    5. *-rgt-identity25.4%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(1 + 4 \cdot \frac{-0.25 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \pi\right)} + 0.25 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \log e\right)}{s}\right)\right) \]
    6. associate-*r*25.4%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(1 + 4 \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot u\right) \cdot \pi} + 0.25 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \log e\right)}{s}\right)\right) \]
    7. log-E25.4%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(1 + 4 \cdot \frac{\left(-0.25 \cdot u\right) \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \color{blue}{1}\right)}{s}\right)\right) \]
    8. associate-*r*25.4%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(1 + 4 \cdot \frac{\left(-0.25 \cdot u\right) \cdot \pi + \color{blue}{\left(0.25 \cdot \pi\right) \cdot 1}}{s}\right)\right) \]
    9. *-rgt-identity25.4%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(1 + 4 \cdot \frac{\left(-0.25 \cdot u\right) \cdot \pi + \color{blue}{0.25 \cdot \pi}}{s}\right)\right) \]
    10. distribute-rgt-out25.4%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(1 + 4 \cdot \frac{\color{blue}{\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot u + 0.25\right)}}{s}\right)\right) \]
  11. Simplified25.4%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + 4 \cdot \frac{\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot u + 0.25\right)}{s}\right)}\right) \]
  12. Final simplification25.4%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(1 + 4 \cdot \frac{\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 + 0.25\right)}{s}\right) \]

Alternative 9: 16.2% accurate, 6.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(-4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(--0.5\right) - \frac{u}{2 - \frac{\pi}{s}}\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (* s (* -4.0 (- (* u (- -0.5)) (/ u (- 2.0 (/ PI s)))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * (-4.0f * ((u * -(-0.5f)) - (u / (2.0f - (((float) M_PI) / s)))));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(Float32(-4.0) * Float32(Float32(u * Float32(-Float32(-0.5))) - Float32(u / Float32(Float32(2.0) - Float32(Float32(pi) / s))))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * (single(-4.0) * ((u * -single(-0.5)) - (u / (single(2.0) - (single(pi) / s)))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(-4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(--0.5\right) - \frac{u}{2 - \frac{\pi}{s}}\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.7%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.7%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Taylor expanded in s around inf 8.8%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{1}}} + -1\right) \]
  4. Taylor expanded in s around inf 15.4%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}\right)}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + 1}} + -1\right) \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. mul-1-neg15.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}\right)} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + 1}} + -1\right) \]
    2. unsub-neg15.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(1 - \frac{\pi}{s}\right)}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + 1}} + -1\right) \]
  6. Simplified15.4%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(1 - \frac{\pi}{s}\right)}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + 1}} + -1\right) \]
  7. Taylor expanded in u around 0 16.1%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{2 - \frac{\pi}{s}} - 0.5\right)\right)\right)} \]
  8. Step-by-step derivation
    1. sub-neg16.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \left(-4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{2 - \frac{\pi}{s}} + \left(-0.5\right)\right)}\right)\right) \]
    2. metadata-eval16.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \left(-4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{2 - \frac{\pi}{s}} + \color{blue}{-0.5}\right)\right)\right) \]
    3. distribute-lft-in16.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \left(-4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \frac{1}{2 - \frac{\pi}{s}} + u \cdot -0.5\right)}\right) \]
    4. associate-*r/16.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \left(-4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\frac{u \cdot 1}{2 - \frac{\pi}{s}}} + u \cdot -0.5\right)\right) \]
    5. *-rgt-identity16.1%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \left(-4 \cdot \left(\frac{\color{blue}{u}}{2 - \frac{\pi}{s}} + u \cdot -0.5\right)\right) \]
  9. Simplified16.1%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-4 \cdot \left(\frac{u}{2 - \frac{\pi}{s}} + u \cdot -0.5\right)\right)} \]
  10. Final simplification16.1%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(--0.5\right) - \frac{u}{2 - \frac{\pi}{s}}\right)\right) \]

Alternative 10: 16.2% accurate, 6.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(-4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(0.5 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{\pi}{s}}\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s)
 :precision binary32
 (* s (* -4.0 (* u (- 0.5 (/ 1.0 (- 2.0 (/ PI s))))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * (-4.0f * (u * (0.5f - (1.0f / (2.0f - (((float) M_PI) / s))))));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(Float32(-4.0) * Float32(u * Float32(Float32(0.5) - Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(2.0) - Float32(Float32(pi) / s)))))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * (single(-4.0) * (u * (single(0.5) - (single(1.0) / (single(2.0) - (single(pi) / s))))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(-4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(0.5 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{\pi}{s}}\right)\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.7%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.7%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Taylor expanded in s around inf 8.8%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{1}}} + -1\right) \]
  4. Taylor expanded in s around inf 15.4%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}\right)}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + 1}} + -1\right) \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. mul-1-neg15.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}\right)} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + 1}} + -1\right) \]
    2. unsub-neg15.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(1 - \frac{\pi}{s}\right)}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + 1}} + -1\right) \]
  6. Simplified15.4%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(1 - \frac{\pi}{s}\right)}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + 1}} + -1\right) \]
  7. Taylor expanded in u around 0 16.1%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{2 - \frac{\pi}{s}} - 0.5\right)\right)\right)} \]
  8. Final simplification16.1%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-4 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(0.5 - \frac{1}{2 - \frac{\pi}{s}}\right)\right)\right) \]

Alternative 11: 15.5% accurate, 6.6× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{2}{1 - u}\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (* s (- (log (+ -1.0 (/ 2.0 (- 1.0 u)))))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * -logf((-1.0f + (2.0f / (1.0f - u))));
}
real(4) function code(u, s)
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    real(4), intent (in) :: s
    code = s * -log(((-1.0e0) + (2.0e0 / (1.0e0 - u))))
end function
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(-log(Float32(Float32(-1.0) + Float32(Float32(2.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) - u))))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * -log((single(-1.0) + (single(2.0) / (single(1.0) - u))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{2}{1 - u}\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.7%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.7%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Taylor expanded in s around inf 8.8%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + \color{blue}{1}}} + -1\right) \]
  4. Taylor expanded in s around inf 15.4%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot \frac{\pi}{s}\right)}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + 1}} + -1\right) \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. mul-1-neg15.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\pi}{s}\right)}\right)} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + 1}} + -1\right) \]
    2. unsub-neg15.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(1 - \frac{\pi}{s}\right)}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + 1}} + -1\right) \]
  6. Simplified15.4%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + \color{blue}{\left(1 - \frac{\pi}{s}\right)}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + 1}} + -1\right) \]
  7. Taylor expanded in s around 0 15.4%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\log \left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{1 - u} - 1\right)} \]
  8. Step-by-step derivation
    1. sub-neg15.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{1 - u} + \left(-1\right)\right)} \]
    2. associate-*r/15.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{1 - u}} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]
    3. metadata-eval15.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{\color{blue}{2}}{1 - u} + \left(-1\right)\right) \]
    4. metadata-eval15.4%

      \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{2}{1 - u} + \color{blue}{-1}\right) \]
  9. Simplified15.4%

    \[\leadsto \left(-s\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{2}{1 - u} + -1\right)} \]
  10. Final simplification15.4%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{2}{1 - u}\right)\right) \]

Alternative 12: 11.5% accurate, 6.8× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(0.25 + u \cdot -0.5\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (* -4.0 (* PI (+ 0.25 (* u -0.5)))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -4.0f * (((float) M_PI) * (0.25f + (u * -0.5f)));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(Float32(-4.0) * Float32(Float32(pi) * Float32(Float32(0.25) + Float32(u * Float32(-0.5)))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = single(-4.0) * (single(pi) * (single(0.25) + (u * single(-0.5))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
-4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(0.25 + u \cdot -0.5\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.7%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.7%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Taylor expanded in s around -inf 12.5%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - \left(-0.25 \cdot \pi + 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)\right)} \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate--r+12.5%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) - 0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
    2. cancel-sign-sub-inv12.5%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(-0.25 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
    3. associate-*r*12.5%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(-0.25 \cdot u\right) \cdot \pi} - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    4. distribute-rgt-out--12.5%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\pi \cdot \left(-0.25 \cdot u - -0.25\right)} + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    5. *-commutative12.5%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(\color{blue}{u \cdot -0.25} - -0.25\right) + \left(-0.25\right) \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    6. metadata-eval12.5%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 - -0.25\right) + \color{blue}{-0.25} \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right) \]
    7. *-commutative12.5%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 - -0.25\right) + \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \pi\right) \cdot -0.25}\right) \]
    8. *-commutative12.5%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 - -0.25\right) + \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot u\right)} \cdot -0.25\right) \]
    9. associate-*l*12.5%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 - -0.25\right) + \color{blue}{\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25\right)}\right) \]
  5. Simplified12.5%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25 - -0.25\right) + \pi \cdot \left(u \cdot -0.25\right)\right)} \]
  6. Taylor expanded in u around 0 12.5%

    \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(-0.5 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right) + 0.25 \cdot \pi\right)} \]
  7. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative12.5%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.25 \cdot \pi + -0.5 \cdot \left(u \cdot \pi\right)\right)} \]
    2. associate-*r*12.5%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(0.25 \cdot \pi + \color{blue}{\left(-0.5 \cdot u\right) \cdot \pi}\right) \]
    3. distribute-rgt-out12.5%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot \left(0.25 + -0.5 \cdot u\right)\right)} \]
    4. *-commutative12.5%

      \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(0.25 + \color{blue}{u \cdot -0.5}\right)\right) \]
  8. Simplified12.5%

    \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\pi \cdot \left(0.25 + u \cdot -0.5\right)\right)} \]
  9. Final simplification12.5%

    \[\leadsto -4 \cdot \left(\pi \cdot \left(0.25 + u \cdot -0.5\right)\right) \]

Alternative 13: 11.3% accurate, 6.9× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \frac{-1}{\frac{s}{\pi}} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (* s (/ -1.0 (/ s PI))))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return s * (-1.0f / (s / ((float) M_PI)));
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(s * Float32(Float32(-1.0) / Float32(s / Float32(pi))))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = s * (single(-1.0) / (s / single(pi)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \frac{-1}{\frac{s}{\pi}}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.7%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.7%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Applied egg-rr6.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0 - s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. neg-sub06.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
    2. distribute-rgt-neg-in6.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)\right)} \]
    3. +-commutative6.8%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)}\right) \]
  5. Simplified6.8%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(-\log \left(-1 + \frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}}\right)\right)} \]
  6. Taylor expanded in u around 0 12.3%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{\pi}{s}}\right) \]
  7. Step-by-step derivation
    1. expm1-log1p-u12.3%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)\right)}\right) \]
  8. Applied egg-rr12.3%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\frac{\pi}{s}\right)\right)}\right) \]
  9. Step-by-step derivation
    1. expm1-log1p-u12.3%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{\pi}{s}}\right) \]
    2. clear-num12.3%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{s}{\pi}}}\right) \]
  10. Applied egg-rr12.3%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{s}{\pi}}}\right) \]
  11. Final simplification12.3%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \frac{-1}{\frac{s}{\pi}} \]

Alternative 14: 11.3% accurate, 7.2× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -\pi \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u s) :precision binary32 (- PI))
float code(float u, float s) {
	return -((float) M_PI);
}
function code(u, s)
	return Float32(-Float32(pi))
end
function tmp = code(u, s)
	tmp = -single(pi);
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
-\pi
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 98.7%

    \[\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{-\pi}{s}}} - \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}\right) + \frac{1}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} - 1\right) \]
  2. Simplified98.7%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-s\right) \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\frac{u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{-s}}} + \frac{1 - u}{1 + e^{\frac{\pi}{s}}}} + -1\right)} \]
  3. Taylor expanded in u around 0 12.3%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \pi} \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. neg-mul-112.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\pi} \]
  5. Simplified12.3%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\pi} \]
  6. Final simplification12.3%

    \[\leadsto -\pi \]

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2023293 
(FPCore (u s)
  :name "Sample trimmed logistic on [-pi, pi]"
  :precision binary32
  :pre (and (and (<= 2.328306437e-10 u) (<= u 1.0)) (and (<= 0.0 s) (<= s 1.0651631)))
  (* (- s) (log (- (/ 1.0 (+ (* u (- (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ (- PI) s)))) (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))) (/ 1.0 (+ 1.0 (exp (/ PI s)))))) 1.0))))