Optimisation.CirclePacking:place from circle-packing-0.1.0.4, I

Percentage Accurate: 100.0% → 100.0%

Time: 1.4s

Alternatives: 6

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x + y\right) + z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (+ x y) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) + z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x + y) + z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) + z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x + y) + z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x + y) + z)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x + y) + z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x + y\right) + z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (+ x y) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) + z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = (x + y) + z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + y) + z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return (x + y) + z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x + y) + z)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = (x + y) + z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z + \left(x + y\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ z (+ x y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z + (x + y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = z + (x + y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z + (x + y);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return z + (x + y)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(z + Float64(x + y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = z + (x + y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(z + N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(x + y\right) + z \]

2. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto z + \left(x + y\right) \]

Alternative 2: 71.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 3.8 \cdot 10^{+57}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (if (<= z 3.8e+57) (+ x y) z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= 3.8e+57) {
		tmp = x + y;
	} else {
		tmp = z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= 3.8d+57) then
        tmp = x + y
    else
        tmp = z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= 3.8e+57) {
		tmp = x + y;
	} else {
		tmp = z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= 3.8e+57:
		tmp = x + y
	else:
		tmp = z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= 3.8e+57)
		tmp = Float64(x + y);
	else
		tmp = z;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= 3.8e+57)
		tmp = x + y;
	else
		tmp = z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, 3.8e+57], N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision], z]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < 3.7999999999999999e57

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) + z \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around 0 76.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 76.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

   4. Simplified 76.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

   if 3.7999999999999999e57 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) + z \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around inf 79.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 76.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 3.8 \cdot 10^{+57}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 75.4% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 2.95 \cdot 10^{+57}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y + z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (if (<= z 2.95e+57) (+ x y) (+ y z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= 2.95e+57) {
		tmp = x + y;
	} else {
		tmp = y + z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= 2.95d+57) then
        tmp = x + y
    else
        tmp = y + z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= 2.95e+57) {
		tmp = x + y;
	} else {
		tmp = y + z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= 2.95e+57:
		tmp = x + y
	else:
		tmp = y + z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= 2.95e+57)
		tmp = Float64(x + y);
	else
		tmp = Float64(y + z);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= 2.95e+57)
		tmp = x + y;
	else
		tmp = y + z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, 2.95e+57], N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision], N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < 2.95000000000000006e57

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) + z \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around 0 76.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + y} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 76.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

   4. Simplified 76.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + x} \]

   if 2.95000000000000006e57 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) + z \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 92.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y + z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 79.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 2.95 \cdot 10^{+57}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y + z\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 43.1% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 5.5 \cdot 10^{+57}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (if (<= z 5.5e+57) x z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= 5.5e+57) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= 5.5d+57) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = z
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= 5.5e+57) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = z;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= 5.5e+57:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = z
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= 5.5e+57)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = z;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= 5.5e+57)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = z;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[z, 5.5e+57], x, z]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < 5.5000000000000002e57

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) + z \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 33.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 5.5000000000000002e57 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(x + y\right) + z \]

   2. Taylor expanded in z around inf 79.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 42.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq 5.5 \cdot 10^{+57}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 67.1% accurate, 1.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x z))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + z)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + z), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(x + y\right) + z \]

2. Taylor expanded in y around 0 62.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + z} \]
3. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 62.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + x} \]

4. Simplified 62.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + x} \]

5. Final simplification 62.1%

   \[\leadsto x + z \]

Alternative 6: 34.2% accurate, 5.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(x + y\right) + z \]

2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 28.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

3. Final simplification 28.5%

   \[\leadsto x \]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023290 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Optimisation.CirclePacking:place from circle-packing-0.1.0.4, I"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (+ x y) z))