SynthBasics:moogVCF from YampaSynth-0.2

Percentage Accurate: 93.2% → 95.7%

Time: 8.2s

Alternatives: 10

Speedup: 0.7×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (* (* y z) (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y))));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + ((y * z) * (math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y))))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * z) * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 93.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (* (* y z) (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y))));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + ((y * z) * (math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y))))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * z) * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 95.7% accurate, 0.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := x + \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;t_1 \leq -\infty:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t_1 \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+292}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (+ x (* (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))) (* y z)))))
   (if (<= t_1 (- INFINITY))
     (* t z)
     (if (<= t_1 5e+292) t_1 (+ x (* z (- t x)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = x + ((tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))) * (y * z));
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= -((double) INFINITY)) {
		tmp = t * z;
	} else if (t_1 <= 5e+292) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = x + ((Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y))) * (y * z));
	double tmp;
	if (t_1 <= -Double.POSITIVE_INFINITY) {
		tmp = t * z;
	} else if (t_1 <= 5e+292) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	t_1 = x + ((math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y))) * (y * z))
	tmp = 0
	if t_1 <= -math.inf:
		tmp = t * z
	elif t_1 <= 5e+292:
		tmp = t_1
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y))) * Float64(y * z)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_1 <= Float64(-Inf))
		tmp = Float64(t * z);
	elseif (t_1 <= 5e+292)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(t - x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = x + ((tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))) * (y * z));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t_1 <= -Inf)
		tmp = t * z;
	elseif (t_1 <= 5e+292)
		tmp = t_1;
	else
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(x + N[(N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$1, (-Infinity)], N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[t$95$1, 5e+292], t$95$1, N[(x + N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (+.f64 x (*.f64 (*.f64 y z) (-.f64 (tanh.f64 (/.f64 t y)) (tanh.f64 (/.f64 x y))))) < -inf.0

   1. Initial program 53.4%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 90.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z + x \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in t around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot t} \]

   6. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot t} \]

   if -inf.0 < (+.f64 x (*.f64 (*.f64 y z) (-.f64 (tanh.f64 (/.f64 t y)) (tanh.f64 (/.f64 x y))))) < 4.9999999999999996e292

   1. Initial program 98.7%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   if 4.9999999999999996e292 < (+.f64 x (*.f64 (*.f64 y z) (-.f64 (tanh.f64 (/.f64 t y)) (tanh.f64 (/.f64 x y)))))

   1. Initial program 52.5%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around inf 93.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x + \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) \leq -\infty:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x + \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right) \leq 5 \cdot 10^{+292}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 2: 97.7% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), z, x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (fma (* y (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y)))) z x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return fma((y * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))), z, x);
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return fma(Float64(y * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y)))), z, x)
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(y * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * z + x), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 94.1%

   \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 94.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

   2. *-commutative 94.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} + x \]

   3. associate-*r* 98.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z} + x \]

   4. fma-def 98.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot y, z, x\right)} \]

3. Applied egg-rr 98.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot y, z, x\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 98.3%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), z, x\right) \]

Alternative 3: 84.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := y \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 6 \cdot 10^{+24}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(t_1, z, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t_1 - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* y (tanh (/ t y)))))
   (if (<= y 6e+24) (fma t_1 z x) (+ x (* z (- t_1 x))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = y * tanh((t / y));
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 6e+24) {
		tmp = fma(t_1, z, x);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t_1 - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(y * tanh(Float64(t / y)))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 6e+24)
		tmp = fma(t_1, z, x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(t_1 - x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(y * N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[y, 6e+24], N[(t$95$1 * z + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(z * N[(t$95$1 - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 5.9999999999999999e24

   1. Initial program 97.6%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 97.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 97.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} + x \]

      3. associate-*r* 99.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z} + x \]

      4. fma-def 99.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot y, z, x\right)} \]

   3. Applied egg-rr 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot y, z, x\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 28.9%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)} \cdot y, z, x\right) \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/r* 28.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right) \cdot y, z, x\right) \]

      2. div-sub 28.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}} \cdot y, z, x\right) \]

      3. rec-exp 28.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} \cdot y, z, x\right) \]

      4. rec-exp 28.9%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}} \cdot y, z, x\right) \]

      5. tanh-def-a 87.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \cdot y, z, x\right) \]

   6. Simplified 87.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \cdot y, z, x\right) \]

   if 5.9999999999999999e24 < y

   1. Initial program 81.3%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 35.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 35.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right) + -1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 80.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot y + \left(-x\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 85.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 6 \cdot 10^{+24}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right), z, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(y \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 83.3% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 3.1 \cdot 10^{+22}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + t_1 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(y \cdot t_1 - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (tanh (/ t y))))
   (if (<= y 3.1e+22) (+ x (* t_1 (* y z))) (+ x (* z (- (* y t_1) x))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = tanh((t / y));
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 3.1e+22) {
		tmp = x + (t_1 * (y * z));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * ((y * t_1) - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = tanh((t / y))
    if (y <= 3.1d+22) then
        tmp = x + (t_1 * (y * z))
    else
        tmp = x + (z * ((y * t_1) - x))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = Math.tanh((t / y));
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 3.1e+22) {
		tmp = x + (t_1 * (y * z));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * ((y * t_1) - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	t_1 = math.tanh((t / y))
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 3.1e+22:
		tmp = x + (t_1 * (y * z))
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * ((y * t_1) - x))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = tanh(Float64(t / y))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 3.1e+22)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(t_1 * Float64(y * z)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(Float64(y * t_1) - x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = tanh((t / y));
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 3.1e+22)
		tmp = x + (t_1 * (y * z));
	else
		tmp = x + (z * ((y * t_1) - x));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[y, 3.1e+22], N[(x + N[(t$95$1 * N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(z * N[(N[(y * t$95$1), $MachinePrecision] - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 3.1000000000000002e22

   1. Initial program 97.6%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 28.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 28.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)} \]

      2. associate-/r* 28.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right) \]

      3. div-sub 28.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}} \]

      4. rec-exp 28.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} \]

      5. rec-exp 28.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}} \]

      6. tanh-def-a 85.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 85.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]

   if 3.1000000000000002e22 < y

   1. Initial program 81.3%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 35.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right) + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 35.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right) + -1 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 80.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot y + \left(-x\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 84.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 3.1 \cdot 10^{+22}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(y \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 82.2% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.3 \cdot 10^{+134}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 1.3e+134) (+ x (* (tanh (/ t y)) (* y z))) (+ x (* z (- t x)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.3e+134) {
		tmp = x + (tanh((t / y)) * (y * z));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 1.3d+134) then
        tmp = x + (tanh((t / y)) * (y * z))
    else
        tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.3e+134) {
		tmp = x + (Math.tanh((t / y)) * (y * z));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 1.3e+134:
		tmp = x + (math.tanh((t / y)) * (y * z))
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 1.3e+134)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) * Float64(y * z)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(t - x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 1.3e+134)
		tmp = x + (tanh((t / y)) * (y * z));
	else
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y, 1.3e+134], N[(x + N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 1.3000000000000001e134

   1. Initial program 97.4%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 28.4%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 28.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)} \]

      2. associate-/r* 28.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right) \]

      3. div-sub 28.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}} \]

      4. rec-exp 28.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} \]

      5. rec-exp 28.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}} \]

      6. tanh-def-a 83.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 83.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]

   if 1.3000000000000001e134 < y

   1. Initial program 72.0%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around inf 75.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 82.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.3 \cdot 10^{+134}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6: 61.0% accurate, 23.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -3.8 \cdot 10^{-302}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.52 \cdot 10^{-201}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -3.8e-302) x (if (<= x 1.52e-201) (* z (- t x)) x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -3.8e-302) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (x <= 1.52e-201) {
		tmp = z * (t - x);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-3.8d-302)) then
        tmp = x
    else if (x <= 1.52d-201) then
        tmp = z * (t - x)
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -3.8e-302) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (x <= 1.52e-201) {
		tmp = z * (t - x);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -3.8e-302:
		tmp = x
	elif x <= 1.52e-201:
		tmp = z * (t - x)
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -3.8e-302)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (x <= 1.52e-201)
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(t - x));
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -3.8e-302)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (x <= 1.52e-201)
		tmp = z * (t - x);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[x, -3.8e-302], x, If[LessEqual[x, 1.52e-201], N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], x]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -3.8e-302 or 1.52000000000000006e-201 < x

   1. Initial program 95.7%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 69.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -3.8e-302 < x < 1.52000000000000006e-201

   1. Initial program 70.1%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around inf 64.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in z around inf 58.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 68.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -3.8 \cdot 10^{-302}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.52 \cdot 10^{-201}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 7: 68.8% accurate, 23.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.05 \cdot 10^{+14}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 2.05e+14) x (+ x (* z (- t x)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 2.05e+14) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 2.05d+14) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 2.05e+14) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 2.05e+14:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 2.05e+14)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(t - x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 2.05e+14)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y, 2.05e+14], x, N[(x + N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 2.05e14

   1. Initial program 98.1%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 73.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 2.05e14 < y

   1. Initial program 80.7%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around inf 67.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 72.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.05 \cdot 10^{+14}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 8: 60.6% accurate, 29.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -8.5 \cdot 10^{-299}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.5 \cdot 10^{-201}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -8.5e-299) x (if (<= x 1.5e-201) (* t z) x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -8.5e-299) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (x <= 1.5e-201) {
		tmp = t * z;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-8.5d-299)) then
        tmp = x
    else if (x <= 1.5d-201) then
        tmp = t * z
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -8.5e-299) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (x <= 1.5e-201) {
		tmp = t * z;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -8.5e-299:
		tmp = x
	elif x <= 1.5e-201:
		tmp = t * z
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -8.5e-299)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (x <= 1.5e-201)
		tmp = Float64(t * z);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -8.5e-299)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (x <= 1.5e-201)
		tmp = t * z;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[x, -8.5e-299], x, If[LessEqual[x, 1.5e-201], N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision], x]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -8.5e-299 or 1.50000000000000001e-201 < x

   1. Initial program 95.7%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 69.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -8.5e-299 < x < 1.50000000000000001e-201

   1. Initial program 70.1%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around inf 64.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 64.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z + x \cdot \left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in t around inf 52.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 52.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot t} \]

   6. Simplified 52.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot t} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 68.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -8.5 \cdot 10^{-299}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.5 \cdot 10^{-201}:\\ \;\;\;\;t \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 9: 65.1% accurate, 30.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 4800:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + t \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (if (<= y 4800.0) x (+ x (* t z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 4800.0) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (t * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 4800.0d0) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = x + (t * z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 4800.0) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (t * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 4800.0:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = x + (t * z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 4800.0)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(t * z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 4800.0)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = x + (t * z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y, 4800.0], x, N[(x + N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 4800

   1. Initial program 98.1%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 73.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 4800 < y

   1. Initial program 81.3%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around inf 68.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in t around inf 59.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 70.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 4800:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + t \cdot z\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 10: 59.7% accurate, 213.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 94.1%

   \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 65.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

3. Final simplification 65.8%

   \[\leadsto x \]

Developer target: 96.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (* y (* z (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + (y * (z * (Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y)))));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + (y * (z * (math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y)))))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y))))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(z * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023290 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "SynthBasics:moogVCF from YampaSynth-0.2"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (+ x (* y (* z (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))

  (+ x (* (* y z) (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))