Numeric.AD.Rank1.Halley:findZero from ad-4.2.4

Percentage Accurate: 82.1% → 98.4%

Time: 5.3s

Alternatives: 3

Speedup: 1.5×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- x (/ (* (* y 2.0) z) (- (* (* z 2.0) z) (* y t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x - (((y * 2.0d0) * z) / (((z * 2.0d0) * z) - (y * t)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(Float64(Float64(y * 2.0) * z) / Float64(Float64(Float64(z * 2.0) * z) - Float64(y * t))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(N[(N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[(z * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 82.1% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- x (/ (* (* y 2.0) z) (- (* (* z 2.0) z) (* y t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x - (((y * 2.0d0) * z) / (((z * 2.0d0) * z) - (y * t)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(Float64(Float64(y * 2.0) * z) / Float64(Float64(Float64(z * 2.0) * z) - Float64(y * t))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(N[(N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[(z * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.4% accurate, 1.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{y \cdot 2}{2 \cdot z - y \cdot \frac{t}{z}} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- x (/ (* y 2.0) (- (* 2.0 z) (* y (/ t z))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - ((y * 2.0) / ((2.0 * z) - (y * (t / z))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x - ((y * 2.0d0) / ((2.0d0 * z) - (y * (t / z))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - ((y * 2.0) / ((2.0 * z) - (y * (t / z))));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - ((y * 2.0) / ((2.0 * z) - (y * (t / z))))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(Float64(y * 2.0) / Float64(Float64(2.0 * z) - Float64(y * Float64(t / z)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x - ((y * 2.0) / ((2.0 * z) - (y * (t / z))));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(2.0 * z), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * N[(t / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 86.5%

   \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-/l* 91.2%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}} \]

   2. associate-*l* 91.2%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right)} - y \cdot t}{z}} \]

3. Simplified 91.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right) - y \cdot t}{z}}} \]

4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 96.6%

   \[\leadsto x - \frac{y \cdot 2}{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{t \cdot y}{z} + 2 \cdot z}} \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 96.6%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{y \cdot 2}{\color{blue}{2 \cdot z + -1 \cdot \frac{t \cdot y}{z}}} \]

   2. *-commutative 96.6%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{y \cdot 2}{\color{blue}{z \cdot 2} + -1 \cdot \frac{t \cdot y}{z}} \]

   3. mul-1-neg 96.6%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{y \cdot 2}{z \cdot 2 + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{t \cdot y}{z}\right)}} \]

   4. associate-*l/ 98.9%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{y \cdot 2}{z \cdot 2 + \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{t}{z} \cdot y}\right)} \]

   5. distribute-lft-neg-out 98.9%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{y \cdot 2}{z \cdot 2 + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{t}{z}\right) \cdot y}} \]

   6. cancel-sign-sub-inv 98.9%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{y \cdot 2}{\color{blue}{z \cdot 2 - \frac{t}{z} \cdot y}} \]

   7. *-commutative 98.9%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{y \cdot 2}{z \cdot 2 - \color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{t}{z}}} \]

6. Simplified 98.9%

   \[\leadsto x - \frac{y \cdot 2}{\color{blue}{z \cdot 2 - y \cdot \frac{t}{z}}} \]

7. Final simplification 98.9%

   \[\leadsto x - \frac{y \cdot 2}{2 \cdot z - y \cdot \frac{t}{z}} \]

Alternative 2: 89.0% accurate, 1.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -9800 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.2 \cdot 10^{-80}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - -2 \cdot \frac{z}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -9800.0) (not (<= z 1.2e-80)))
   (- x (/ y z))
   (- x (* -2.0 (/ z t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -9800.0) || !(z <= 1.2e-80)) {
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	} else {
		tmp = x - (-2.0 * (z / t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-9800.0d0)) .or. (.not. (z <= 1.2d-80))) then
        tmp = x - (y / z)
    else
        tmp = x - ((-2.0d0) * (z / t))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -9800.0) || !(z <= 1.2e-80)) {
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	} else {
		tmp = x - (-2.0 * (z / t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -9800.0) or not (z <= 1.2e-80):
		tmp = x - (y / z)
	else:
		tmp = x - (-2.0 * (z / t))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -9800.0) || !(z <= 1.2e-80))
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(y / z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(-2.0 * Float64(z / t)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -9800.0) || ~((z <= 1.2e-80)))
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	else
		tmp = x - (-2.0 * (z / t));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -9800.0], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 1.2e-80]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x - N[(y / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x - N[(-2.0 * N[(z / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -9800 or 1.2e-80 < z

   1. Initial program 78.9%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 90.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}} \]

      2. associate-*l* 90.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right)} - y \cdot t}{z}} \]

   3. Simplified 90.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right) - y \cdot t}{z}}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 95.7%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{z}} \]

   if -9800 < z < 1.2e-80

   1. Initial program 94.1%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 92.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}} \]

      2. associate-*l* 92.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right)} - y \cdot t}{z}} \]

   3. Simplified 92.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right) - y \cdot t}{z}}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 94.4%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 95.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -9800 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.2 \cdot 10^{-80}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - -2 \cdot \frac{z}{t}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 63.0% accurate, 3.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{y}{z} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- x (/ y z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (y / z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x - (y / z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (y / z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - (y / z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(y / z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x - (y / z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(y / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 86.5%

   \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-/l* 91.2%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}} \]

   2. associate-*l* 91.2%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right)} - y \cdot t}{z}} \]

3. Simplified 91.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right) - y \cdot t}{z}}} \]

4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 61.7%

   \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{z}} \]

5. Final simplification 61.7%

   \[\leadsto x - \frac{y}{z} \]

Developer target: 99.9% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{1}{\frac{z}{y} - \frac{\frac{t}{2}}{z}} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- x (/ 1.0 (- (/ z y) (/ (/ t 2.0) z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (1.0 / ((z / y) - ((t / 2.0) / z)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x - (1.0d0 / ((z / y) - ((t / 2.0d0) / z)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (1.0 / ((z / y) - ((t / 2.0) / z)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - (1.0 / ((z / y) - ((t / 2.0) / z)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(1.0 / Float64(Float64(z / y) - Float64(Float64(t / 2.0) / z))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x - (1.0 / ((z / y) - ((t / 2.0) / z)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(1.0 / N[(N[(z / y), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(t / 2.0), $MachinePrecision] / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023287 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "Numeric.AD.Rank1.Halley:findZero from ad-4.2.4"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (- x (/ 1.0 (- (/ z y) (/ (/ t 2.0) z))))

  (- x (/ (* (* y 2.0) z) (- (* (* z 2.0) z) (* y t)))))