Data.Colour.RGBSpace.HSL:hsl from colour-2.3.3, E

Percentage Accurate: 99.7% → 99.8%

Time: 7.4s

Alternatives: 7

Speedup: 1.0×

• 21.0% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(\left(y - x\right) \cdot 6\right) \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* (* (- y x) 6.0) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (((y - x) * 6.0) * z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (((y - x) * 6.0d0) * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (((y - x) * 6.0) * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (((y - x) * 6.0) * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(Float64(y - x) * 6.0) * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (((y - x) * 6.0) * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(N[(N[(y - x), $MachinePrecision] * 6.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(\left(y - x\right) \cdot 6\right) \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* (* (- y x) 6.0) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (((y - x) * 6.0) * z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (((y - x) * 6.0d0) * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (((y - x) * 6.0) * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (((y - x) * 6.0) * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(Float64(y - x) * 6.0) * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (((y - x) * 6.0) * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(N[(N[(y - x), $MachinePrecision] * 6.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot \left(6 \cdot z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* (- y x) (* 6.0 z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + ((y - x) * (6.0 * z));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + ((y - x) * (6.0d0 * z))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + ((y - x) * (6.0 * z));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + ((y - x) * (6.0 * z))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y - x) * Float64(6.0 * z)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + ((y - x) * (6.0 * z));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y - x), $MachinePrecision] * N[(6.0 * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.5%

   \[x + \left(\left(y - x\right) \cdot 6\right) \cdot z \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-*l* 99.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y - x\right) \cdot \left(6 \cdot z\right)} \]

3. Simplified 99.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot \left(6 \cdot z\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 99.8%

   \[\leadsto x + \left(y - x\right) \cdot \left(6 \cdot z\right) \]

Alternative 2: 84.3% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -4.8 \cdot 10^{+22} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.08 \cdot 10^{-182}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + 6 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + -6 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -4.8e+22) (not (<= y 1.08e-182)))
   (+ x (* 6.0 (* y z)))
   (+ x (* -6.0 (* x z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -4.8e+22) || !(y <= 1.08e-182)) {
		tmp = x + (6.0 * (y * z));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (-6.0 * (x * z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-4.8d+22)) .or. (.not. (y <= 1.08d-182))) then
        tmp = x + (6.0d0 * (y * z))
    else
        tmp = x + ((-6.0d0) * (x * z))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -4.8e+22) || !(y <= 1.08e-182)) {
		tmp = x + (6.0 * (y * z));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (-6.0 * (x * z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -4.8e+22) or not (y <= 1.08e-182):
		tmp = x + (6.0 * (y * z))
	else:
		tmp = x + (-6.0 * (x * z))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -4.8e+22) || !(y <= 1.08e-182))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(6.0 * Float64(y * z)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(-6.0 * Float64(x * z)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -4.8e+22) || ~((y <= 1.08e-182)))
		tmp = x + (6.0 * (y * z));
	else
		tmp = x + (-6.0 * (x * z));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -4.8e+22], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 1.08e-182]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(6.0 * N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(-6.0 * N[(x * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -4.8e22 or 1.08000000000000003e-182 < y

   1. Initial program 99.2%

      \[x + \left(\left(y - x\right) \cdot 6\right) \cdot z \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around inf 87.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{6 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 87.7%

         \[\leadsto x + 6 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 87.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{6 \cdot \left(z \cdot y\right)} \]

   if -4.8e22 < y < 1.08000000000000003e-182

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x + \left(\left(y - x\right) \cdot 6\right) \cdot z \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around 0 90.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{-6 \cdot \left(z \cdot x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 88.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -4.8 \cdot 10^{+22} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 1.08 \cdot 10^{-182}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + 6 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + -6 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 84.2% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -5.4 \cdot 10^{+23}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + 6 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.08 \cdot 10^{-182}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + -6 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(y \cdot 6\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -5.4e+23)
   (+ x (* 6.0 (* y z)))
   (if (<= y 1.08e-182) (+ x (* -6.0 (* x z))) (+ x (* z (* y 6.0))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -5.4e+23) {
		tmp = x + (6.0 * (y * z));
	} else if (y <= 1.08e-182) {
		tmp = x + (-6.0 * (x * z));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (y * 6.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-5.4d+23)) then
        tmp = x + (6.0d0 * (y * z))
    else if (y <= 1.08d-182) then
        tmp = x + ((-6.0d0) * (x * z))
    else
        tmp = x + (z * (y * 6.0d0))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -5.4e+23) {
		tmp = x + (6.0 * (y * z));
	} else if (y <= 1.08e-182) {
		tmp = x + (-6.0 * (x * z));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (y * 6.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -5.4e+23:
		tmp = x + (6.0 * (y * z))
	elif y <= 1.08e-182:
		tmp = x + (-6.0 * (x * z))
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * (y * 6.0))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -5.4e+23)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(6.0 * Float64(y * z)));
	elseif (y <= 1.08e-182)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(-6.0 * Float64(x * z)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(y * 6.0)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -5.4e+23)
		tmp = x + (6.0 * (y * z));
	elseif (y <= 1.08e-182)
		tmp = x + (-6.0 * (x * z));
	else
		tmp = x + (z * (y * 6.0));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -5.4e+23], N[(x + N[(6.0 * N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 1.08e-182], N[(x + N[(-6.0 * N[(x * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(z * N[(y * 6.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < -5.3999999999999997e23

   1. Initial program 98.3%

      \[x + \left(\left(y - x\right) \cdot 6\right) \cdot z \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around inf 90.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{6 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 90.7%

         \[\leadsto x + 6 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 90.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{6 \cdot \left(z \cdot y\right)} \]

   if -5.3999999999999997e23 < y < 1.08000000000000003e-182

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x + \left(\left(y - x\right) \cdot 6\right) \cdot z \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around 0 90.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{-6 \cdot \left(z \cdot x\right)} \]

   if 1.08000000000000003e-182 < y

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[x + \left(\left(y - x\right) \cdot 6\right) \cdot z \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around inf 85.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(6 \cdot y\right)} \cdot z \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 88.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -5.4 \cdot 10^{+23}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + 6 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.08 \cdot 10^{-182}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + -6 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(y \cdot 6\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 61.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -0.165 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2.6 \cdot 10^{-8}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-6 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -0.165) (not (<= z 2.6e-8))) (* -6.0 (* x z)) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -0.165) || !(z <= 2.6e-8)) {
		tmp = -6.0 * (x * z);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-0.165d0)) .or. (.not. (z <= 2.6d-8))) then
        tmp = (-6.0d0) * (x * z)
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -0.165) || !(z <= 2.6e-8)) {
		tmp = -6.0 * (x * z);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -0.165) or not (z <= 2.6e-8):
		tmp = -6.0 * (x * z)
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -0.165) || !(z <= 2.6e-8))
		tmp = Float64(-6.0 * Float64(x * z));
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -0.165) || ~((z <= 2.6e-8)))
		tmp = -6.0 * (x * z);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -0.165], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 2.6e-8]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(-6.0 * N[(x * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], x]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -0.165000000000000008 or 2.6000000000000001e-8 < z

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[x + \left(\left(y - x\right) \cdot 6\right) \cdot z \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around 0 55.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{-6 \cdot \left(z \cdot x\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 55.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-6 \cdot \left(z \cdot x\right) + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 55.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot x\right) \cdot -6} + x \]

      3. fma-def 55.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot x, -6, x\right)} \]

      4. *-commutative 55.6%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{x \cdot z}, -6, x\right) \]

   4. Applied egg-rr 55.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x \cdot z, -6, x\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in z around inf 55.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-6 \cdot \left(z \cdot x\right)} \]

   if -0.165000000000000008 < z < 2.6000000000000001e-8

   1. Initial program 99.2%

      \[x + \left(\left(y - x\right) \cdot 6\right) \cdot z \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around 0 75.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{-6 \cdot \left(z \cdot x\right)} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 74.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 65.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -0.165 \lor \neg \left(z \leq 2.6 \cdot 10^{-8}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;-6 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 99.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + z \cdot \left(\left(y - x\right) \cdot 6\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* z (* (- y x) 6.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (z * ((y - x) * 6.0));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (z * ((y - x) * 6.0d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (z * ((y - x) * 6.0));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (z * ((y - x) * 6.0))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(Float64(y - x) * 6.0)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (z * ((y - x) * 6.0));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(z * N[(N[(y - x), $MachinePrecision] * 6.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.5%

   \[x + \left(\left(y - x\right) \cdot 6\right) \cdot z \]

2. Final simplification 99.5%

   \[\leadsto x + z \cdot \left(\left(y - x\right) \cdot 6\right) \]

Alternative 6: 62.5% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + -6 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* -6.0 (* x z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (-6.0 * (x * z));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + ((-6.0d0) * (x * z))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (-6.0 * (x * z));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (-6.0 * (x * z))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(-6.0 * Float64(x * z)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (-6.0 * (x * z));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(-6.0 * N[(x * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.5%

   \[x + \left(\left(y - x\right) \cdot 6\right) \cdot z \]

2. Taylor expanded in y around 0 66.2%

   \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{-6 \cdot \left(z \cdot x\right)} \]

3. Final simplification 66.2%

   \[\leadsto x + -6 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right) \]

Alternative 7: 36.8% accurate, 9.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.5%

   \[x + \left(\left(y - x\right) \cdot 6\right) \cdot z \]

2. Taylor expanded in y around 0 66.2%

   \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{-6 \cdot \left(z \cdot x\right)} \]

3. Taylor expanded in z around 0 41.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

4. Final simplification 41.0%

   \[\leadsto x \]

Developer target: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \left(6 \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(x - y\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- x (* (* 6.0 z) (- x y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x - ((6.0 * z) * (x - y));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x - ((6.0d0 * z) * (x - y))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x - ((6.0 * z) * (x - y));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x - ((6.0 * z) * (x - y))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x - Float64(Float64(6.0 * z) * Float64(x - y)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x - ((6.0 * z) * (x - y));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x - N[(N[(6.0 * z), $MachinePrecision] * N[(x - y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023279 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Data.Colour.RGBSpace.HSL:hsl from colour-2.3.3, E"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (- x (* (* 6.0 z) (- x y)))

  (+ x (* (* (- y x) 6.0) z)))