Numeric.SpecFunctions:logGamma from math-functions-0.1.5.2, B

Percentage Accurate: 69.0% → 98.3%

Time: 7.0s

Alternatives: 8

Speedup: 4.2×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (+
  x
  (/
   (*
    y
    (+
     (* (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968) z)
     0.279195317918525))
   (+ (* (+ z 6.012459259764103) z) 3.350343815022304))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889d0) + 0.4917317610505968d0) * z) + 0.279195317918525d0)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103d0) * z) + 3.350343815022304d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / Float64(Float64(Float64(z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y * N[(N[(N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 69.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (+
  x
  (/
   (*
    y
    (+
     (* (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968) z)
     0.279195317918525))
   (+ (* (+ z 6.012459259764103) z) 3.350343815022304))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889d0) + 0.4917317610505968d0) * z) + 0.279195317918525d0)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103d0) * z) + 3.350343815022304d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / Float64(Float64(Float64(z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y * N[(N[(N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.3% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.4 \cdot 10^{+26} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 4.2 \cdot 10^{-6}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{14.431876219268936}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{z \cdot 0.39999999996247915 + 12.000000000000014}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -2.4e+26) (not (<= z 4.2e-6)))
   (+ x (/ y 14.431876219268936))
   (+ x (/ y (+ (* z 0.39999999996247915) 12.000000000000014)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -2.4e+26) || !(z <= 4.2e-6)) {
		tmp = x + (y / 14.431876219268936);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y / ((z * 0.39999999996247915) + 12.000000000000014));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-2.4d+26)) .or. (.not. (z <= 4.2d-6))) then
        tmp = x + (y / 14.431876219268936d0)
    else
        tmp = x + (y / ((z * 0.39999999996247915d0) + 12.000000000000014d0))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -2.4e+26) || !(z <= 4.2e-6)) {
		tmp = x + (y / 14.431876219268936);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y / ((z * 0.39999999996247915) + 12.000000000000014));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -2.4e+26) or not (z <= 4.2e-6):
		tmp = x + (y / 14.431876219268936)
	else:
		tmp = x + (y / ((z * 0.39999999996247915) + 12.000000000000014))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -2.4e+26) || !(z <= 4.2e-6))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y / 14.431876219268936));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y / Float64(Float64(z * 0.39999999996247915) + 12.000000000000014)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -2.4e+26) || ~((z <= 4.2e-6)))
		tmp = x + (y / 14.431876219268936);
	else
		tmp = x + (y / ((z * 0.39999999996247915) + 12.000000000000014));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -2.4e+26], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 4.2e-6]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(y / 14.431876219268936), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y / N[(N[(z * 0.39999999996247915), $MachinePrecision] + 12.000000000000014), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -2.40000000000000005e26 or 4.1999999999999996e-6 < z

   1. Initial program 35.6%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 53.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}}} \]

      2. fma-def 53.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}} \]

      3. fma-def 53.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]

      4. fma-def 53.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 53.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\color{blue}{14.431876219268936}} \]

   if -2.40000000000000005e26 < z < 4.1999999999999996e-6

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 99.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}}} \]

      2. fma-def 99.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}} \]

      3. fma-def 99.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]

      4. fma-def 99.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\color{blue}{0.39999999996247915 \cdot z + 12.000000000000014}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.4 \cdot 10^{+26} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 4.2 \cdot 10^{-6}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{14.431876219268936}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{z \cdot 0.39999999996247915 + 12.000000000000014}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 2: 99.5% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+305}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{14.431876219268936}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<=
      (/
       (*
        y
        (+
         (* z (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968))
         0.279195317918525))
       (+ (* z (+ z 6.012459259764103)) 3.350343815022304))
      2e+305)
   (+
    x
    (/
     y
     (/
      (fma (+ z 6.012459259764103) z 3.350343815022304)
      (fma
       (fma z 0.0692910599291889 0.4917317610505968)
       z
       0.279195317918525))))
   (+ x (/ y 14.431876219268936))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (((y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / ((z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)) <= 2e+305) {
		tmp = x + (y / (fma((z + 6.012459259764103), z, 3.350343815022304) / fma(fma(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968), z, 0.279195317918525)));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y / 14.431876219268936);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(z * Float64(Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / Float64(Float64(z * Float64(z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)) <= 2e+305)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y / Float64(fma(Float64(z + 6.012459259764103), z, 3.350343815022304) / fma(fma(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968), z, 0.279195317918525))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y / 14.431876219268936));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[N[(N[(y * N[(N[(z * N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(z * N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 2e+305], N[(x + N[(y / N[(N[(N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision] * z + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision] * z + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y / 14.431876219268936), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z 692910599291889/10000000000000000) 307332350656623/625000000000000) z) 11167812716741/40000000000000)) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z 6012459259764103/1000000000000000) z) 104698244219447/31250000000000)) < 1.9999999999999999e305

   1. Initial program 92.4%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 99.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}}} \]

      2. fma-def 99.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}} \]

      3. fma-def 99.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]

      4. fma-def 99.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]

   if 1.9999999999999999e305 < (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z 692910599291889/10000000000000000) 307332350656623/625000000000000) z) 11167812716741/40000000000000)) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z 6012459259764103/1000000000000000) z) 104698244219447/31250000000000))

   1. Initial program 0.5%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 11.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}}} \]

      2. fma-def 11.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}} \]

      3. fma-def 11.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]

      4. fma-def 11.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 11.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\color{blue}{14.431876219268936}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+305}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{14.431876219268936}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 98.6% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+305}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)} \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{14.431876219268936}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<=
      (/
       (*
        y
        (+
         (* z (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968))
         0.279195317918525))
       (+ (* z (+ z 6.012459259764103)) 3.350343815022304))
      2e+305)
   (+
    x
    (*
     (/ y (fma z (+ z 6.012459259764103) 3.350343815022304))
     (fma z (fma z 0.0692910599291889 0.4917317610505968) 0.279195317918525)))
   (+ x (/ y 14.431876219268936))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (((y * ((z * ((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / ((z * (z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)) <= 2e+305) {
		tmp = x + ((y / fma(z, (z + 6.012459259764103), 3.350343815022304)) * fma(z, fma(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968), 0.279195317918525));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y / 14.431876219268936);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(z * Float64(Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968)) + 0.279195317918525)) / Float64(Float64(z * Float64(z + 6.012459259764103)) + 3.350343815022304)) <= 2e+305)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y / fma(z, Float64(z + 6.012459259764103), 3.350343815022304)) * fma(z, fma(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968), 0.279195317918525)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y / 14.431876219268936));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[N[(N[(y * N[(N[(z * N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(z * N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 2e+305], N[(x + N[(N[(y / N[(z * N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(z * N[(z * 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y / 14.431876219268936), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z 692910599291889/10000000000000000) 307332350656623/625000000000000) z) 11167812716741/40000000000000)) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z 6012459259764103/1000000000000000) z) 104698244219447/31250000000000)) < 1.9999999999999999e305

   1. Initial program 92.4%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 99.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 99.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304} \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \]

      3. fma-def 99.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \]

      4. *-commutative 99.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)} \cdot \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525\right) \]

      5. fma-def 99.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)} \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)} \]

      6. fma-def 99.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)} \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)} \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)} \]

   if 1.9999999999999999e305 < (/.f64 (*.f64 y (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 (*.f64 z 692910599291889/10000000000000000) 307332350656623/625000000000000) z) 11167812716741/40000000000000)) (+.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 z 6012459259764103/1000000000000000) z) 104698244219447/31250000000000))

   1. Initial program 0.5%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 11.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}}} \]

      2. fma-def 11.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}} \]

      3. fma-def 11.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]

      4. fma-def 11.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 11.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\color{blue}{14.431876219268936}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) + 0.279195317918525\right)}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) + 3.350343815022304} \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+305}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)} \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{14.431876219268936}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 98.1% accurate, 2.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.4 \cdot 10^{+26} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 4.2 \cdot 10^{-6}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.08333333333333323\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -2.4e+26) (not (<= z 4.2e-6)))
   (+ x (* y 0.0692910599291889))
   (+ x (* y 0.08333333333333323))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -2.4e+26) || !(z <= 4.2e-6)) {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.08333333333333323);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-2.4d+26)) .or. (.not. (z <= 4.2d-6))) then
        tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889d0)
    else
        tmp = x + (y * 0.08333333333333323d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -2.4e+26) || !(z <= 4.2e-6)) {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.08333333333333323);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -2.4e+26) or not (z <= 4.2e-6):
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889)
	else:
		tmp = x + (y * 0.08333333333333323)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -2.4e+26) || !(z <= 4.2e-6))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * 0.0692910599291889));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * 0.08333333333333323));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -2.4e+26) || ~((z <= 4.2e-6)))
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	else
		tmp = x + (y * 0.08333333333333323);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -2.4e+26], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 4.2e-6]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(y * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * 0.08333333333333323), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -2.40000000000000005e26 or 4.1999999999999996e-6 < z

   1. Initial program 35.6%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 52.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 52.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304} \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \]

      3. fma-def 52.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \]

      4. *-commutative 52.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)} \cdot \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525\right) \]

      5. fma-def 52.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)} \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)} \]

      6. fma-def 52.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)} \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right) \]

   3. Simplified 52.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)} \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889} \]

   6. Simplified 99.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889} \]

   if -2.40000000000000005e26 < z < 4.1999999999999996e-6

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304} \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \]

      3. fma-def 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \]

      4. *-commutative 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)} \cdot \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525\right) \]

      5. fma-def 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)} \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)} \]

      6. fma-def 99.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)} \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)} \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{0.08333333333333323 \cdot y} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.08333333333333323} \]

   6. Simplified 99.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.08333333333333323} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.4 \cdot 10^{+26} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 4.2 \cdot 10^{-6}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.08333333333333323\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 98.1% accurate, 2.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.4 \cdot 10^{+26} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 4.2 \cdot 10^{-6}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{12.000000000000014}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -2.4e+26) (not (<= z 4.2e-6)))
   (+ x (* y 0.0692910599291889))
   (+ x (/ y 12.000000000000014))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -2.4e+26) || !(z <= 4.2e-6)) {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y / 12.000000000000014);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-2.4d+26)) .or. (.not. (z <= 4.2d-6))) then
        tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889d0)
    else
        tmp = x + (y / 12.000000000000014d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -2.4e+26) || !(z <= 4.2e-6)) {
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y / 12.000000000000014);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -2.4e+26) or not (z <= 4.2e-6):
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889)
	else:
		tmp = x + (y / 12.000000000000014)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -2.4e+26) || !(z <= 4.2e-6))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * 0.0692910599291889));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y / 12.000000000000014));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -2.4e+26) || ~((z <= 4.2e-6)))
		tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
	else
		tmp = x + (y / 12.000000000000014);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -2.4e+26], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 4.2e-6]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(y * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y / 12.000000000000014), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -2.40000000000000005e26 or 4.1999999999999996e-6 < z

   1. Initial program 35.6%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*l/ 52.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 52.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304} \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \]

      3. fma-def 52.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \]

      4. *-commutative 52.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)} \cdot \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525\right) \]

      5. fma-def 52.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)} \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)} \]

      6. fma-def 52.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)} \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right) \]

   3. Simplified 52.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)} \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 99.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889} \]

   6. Simplified 99.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889} \]

   if -2.40000000000000005e26 < z < 4.1999999999999996e-6

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 99.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}}} \]

      2. fma-def 99.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}} \]

      3. fma-def 99.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]

      4. fma-def 99.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.4%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\color{blue}{12.000000000000014}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.4 \cdot 10^{+26} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 4.2 \cdot 10^{-6}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{12.000000000000014}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6: 98.3% accurate, 2.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.4 \cdot 10^{+26} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 4.2 \cdot 10^{-6}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{14.431876219268936}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{12.000000000000014}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -2.4e+26) (not (<= z 4.2e-6)))
   (+ x (/ y 14.431876219268936))
   (+ x (/ y 12.000000000000014))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -2.4e+26) || !(z <= 4.2e-6)) {
		tmp = x + (y / 14.431876219268936);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y / 12.000000000000014);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-2.4d+26)) .or. (.not. (z <= 4.2d-6))) then
        tmp = x + (y / 14.431876219268936d0)
    else
        tmp = x + (y / 12.000000000000014d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -2.4e+26) || !(z <= 4.2e-6)) {
		tmp = x + (y / 14.431876219268936);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y / 12.000000000000014);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -2.4e+26) or not (z <= 4.2e-6):
		tmp = x + (y / 14.431876219268936)
	else:
		tmp = x + (y / 12.000000000000014)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -2.4e+26) || !(z <= 4.2e-6))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y / 14.431876219268936));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y / 12.000000000000014));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -2.4e+26) || ~((z <= 4.2e-6)))
		tmp = x + (y / 14.431876219268936);
	else
		tmp = x + (y / 12.000000000000014);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -2.4e+26], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 4.2e-6]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(y / 14.431876219268936), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y / 12.000000000000014), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -2.40000000000000005e26 or 4.1999999999999996e-6 < z

   1. Initial program 35.6%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 53.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}}} \]

      2. fma-def 53.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}} \]

      3. fma-def 53.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]

      4. fma-def 53.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 53.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\color{blue}{14.431876219268936}} \]

   if -2.40000000000000005e26 < z < 4.1999999999999996e-6

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 99.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}}} \]

      2. fma-def 99.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}} \]

      3. fma-def 99.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]

      4. fma-def 99.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}} \]

   3. Simplified 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 99.4%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\color{blue}{12.000000000000014}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -2.4 \cdot 10^{+26} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 4.2 \cdot 10^{-6}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{14.431876219268936}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{y}{12.000000000000014}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 7: 79.4% accurate, 4.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* y 0.0692910599291889)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (y * 0.0692910599291889)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * 0.0692910599291889))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (y * 0.0692910599291889);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(y * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 70.2%

   \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-*l/ 77.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)} \]

   2. *-commutative 77.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z + 6.012459259764103\right)} + 3.350343815022304} \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \]

   3. fma-def 77.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)}} \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right) \]

   4. *-commutative 77.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)} \cdot \left(\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right)} + 0.279195317918525\right) \]

   5. fma-def 77.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)} \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, 0.279195317918525\right)} \]

   6. fma-def 77.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)} \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, 0.279195317918525\right) \]

3. Simplified 77.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{y}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, z + 6.012459259764103, 3.350343815022304\right)} \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(z, \mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), 0.279195317918525\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 79.9%

   \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{0.0692910599291889 \cdot y} \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 79.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889} \]

6. Simplified 79.9%

   \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot 0.0692910599291889} \]

7. Final simplification 79.9%

   \[\leadsto x + y \cdot 0.0692910599291889 \]

Alternative 8: 50.2% accurate, 21.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 70.2%

   \[x + \frac{y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-/l* 78.1%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}}} \]

   2. fma-def 78.1%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}}{\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525}} \]

   3. fma-def 78.1%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]

   4. fma-def 78.1%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right)}, z, 0.279195317918525\right)}} \]

3. Simplified 78.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{y}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(z + 6.012459259764103, z, 3.350343815022304\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(z, 0.0692910599291889, 0.4917317610505968\right), z, 0.279195317918525\right)}}} \]

4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 82.1%

   \[\leadsto x + \frac{y}{\color{blue}{12.000000000000014}} \]

5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 54.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

6. Final simplification 54.0%

   \[\leadsto x \]

Developer target: 99.5% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \left(\frac{0.07512208616047561}{z} + 0.0692910599291889\right) \cdot y - \left(\frac{0.40462203869992125 \cdot y}{z \cdot z} - x\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;z < -8120153.652456675:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;z < 6.576118972787377 \cdot 10^{+20}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(y \cdot \left(\left(z \cdot 0.0692910599291889 + 0.4917317610505968\right) \cdot z + 0.279195317918525\right)\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\left(z + 6.012459259764103\right) \cdot z + 3.350343815022304}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0
         (-
          (* (+ (/ 0.07512208616047561 z) 0.0692910599291889) y)
          (- (/ (* 0.40462203869992125 y) (* z z)) x))))
   (if (< z -8120153.652456675)
     t_0
     (if (< z 6.576118972787377e+20)
       (+
        x
        (*
         (*
          y
          (+
           (* (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968) z)
           0.279195317918525))
         (/ 1.0 (+ (* (+ z 6.012459259764103) z) 3.350343815022304))))
       t_0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (((0.07512208616047561 / z) + 0.0692910599291889) * y) - (((0.40462203869992125 * y) / (z * z)) - x);
	double tmp;
	if (z < -8120153.652456675) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (z < 6.576118972787377e+20) {
		tmp = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) * (1.0 / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304)));
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = (((0.07512208616047561d0 / z) + 0.0692910599291889d0) * y) - (((0.40462203869992125d0 * y) / (z * z)) - x)
    if (z < (-8120153.652456675d0)) then
        tmp = t_0
    else if (z < 6.576118972787377d+20) then
        tmp = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889d0) + 0.4917317610505968d0) * z) + 0.279195317918525d0)) * (1.0d0 / (((z + 6.012459259764103d0) * z) + 3.350343815022304d0)))
    else
        tmp = t_0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = (((0.07512208616047561 / z) + 0.0692910599291889) * y) - (((0.40462203869992125 * y) / (z * z)) - x);
	double tmp;
	if (z < -8120153.652456675) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (z < 6.576118972787377e+20) {
		tmp = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) * (1.0 / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304)));
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = (((0.07512208616047561 / z) + 0.0692910599291889) * y) - (((0.40462203869992125 * y) / (z * z)) - x)
	tmp = 0
	if z < -8120153.652456675:
		tmp = t_0
	elif z < 6.576118972787377e+20:
		tmp = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) * (1.0 / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304)))
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(0.07512208616047561 / z) + 0.0692910599291889) * y) - Float64(Float64(Float64(0.40462203869992125 * y) / Float64(z * z)) - x))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z < -8120153.652456675)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (z < 6.576118972787377e+20)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) * Float64(1.0 / Float64(Float64(Float64(z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304))));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = (((0.07512208616047561 / z) + 0.0692910599291889) * y) - (((0.40462203869992125 * y) / (z * z)) - x);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z < -8120153.652456675)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (z < 6.576118972787377e+20)
		tmp = x + ((y * ((((z * 0.0692910599291889) + 0.4917317610505968) * z) + 0.279195317918525)) * (1.0 / (((z + 6.012459259764103) * z) + 3.350343815022304)));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(N[(N[(0.07512208616047561 / z), $MachinePrecision] + 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(N[(0.40462203869992125 * y), $MachinePrecision] / N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Less[z, -8120153.652456675], t$95$0, If[Less[z, 6.576118972787377e+20], N[(x + N[(N[(y * N[(N[(N[(N[(z * 0.0692910599291889), $MachinePrecision] + 0.4917317610505968), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + 0.279195317918525), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(1.0 / N[(N[(N[(z + 6.012459259764103), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] + 3.350343815022304), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023279 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Numeric.SpecFunctions:logGamma from math-functions-0.1.5.2, B"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (if (< z -8120153.652456675) (- (* (+ (/ 0.07512208616047561 z) 0.0692910599291889) y) (- (/ (* 0.40462203869992125 y) (* z z)) x)) (if (< z 6.576118972787377e+20) (+ x (* (* y (+ (* (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968) z) 0.279195317918525)) (/ 1.0 (+ (* (+ z 6.012459259764103) z) 3.350343815022304)))) (- (* (+ (/ 0.07512208616047561 z) 0.0692910599291889) y) (- (/ (* 0.40462203869992125 y) (* z z)) x))))

  (+ x (/ (* y (+ (* (+ (* z 0.0692910599291889) 0.4917317610505968) z) 0.279195317918525)) (+ (* (+ z 6.012459259764103) z) 3.350343815022304))))