SynthBasics:moogVCF from YampaSynth-0.2

Percentage Accurate: 94.1% → 97.8%

Time: 11.2s

Alternatives: 8

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (* (* y z) (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y))));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + ((y * z) * (math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y))))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * z) * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 94.1% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (* (* y z) (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * z) * (Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y))));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + ((y * z) * (math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y))))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * z) * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + ((y * z) * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 97.8% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), z, x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (fma (* y (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y)))) z x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return fma((y * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))), z, x);
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return fma(Float64(y * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y)))), z, x)
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(y * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * z + x), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 91.9%

   \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 91.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

   2. *-commutative 91.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} + x \]

   3. associate-*r* 98.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z} + x \]

   4. fma-def 98.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot y, z, x\right)} \]

3. Applied egg-rr 98.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot y, z, x\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 98.2%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(y \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right), z, x\right) \]

Alternative 2: 95.5% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 9.4 \cdot 10^{+167}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 9.4e+167)
   (+ x (* (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))) (* y z)))
   (+ x (* z (- t x)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 9.4e+167) {
		tmp = x + ((tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))) * (y * z));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 9.4d+167) then
        tmp = x + ((tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))) * (y * z))
    else
        tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 9.4e+167) {
		tmp = x + ((Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y))) * (y * z));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 9.4e+167:
		tmp = x + ((math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y))) * (y * z))
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 9.4e+167)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y))) * Float64(y * z)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(t - x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 9.4e+167)
		tmp = x + ((tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y))) * (y * z));
	else
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y, 9.4e+167], N[(x + N[(N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 9.40000000000000026e167

   1. Initial program 94.7%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   if 9.40000000000000026e167 < y

   1. Initial program 69.5%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around inf 96.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 94.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 9.4 \cdot 10^{+167}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 82.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.15 \cdot 10^{+75}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right), z, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 2.15e+75) (fma (* y (tanh (/ t y))) z x) (+ x (* z (- t x)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 2.15e+75) {
		tmp = fma((y * tanh((t / y))), z, x);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 2.15e+75)
		tmp = fma(Float64(y * tanh(Float64(t / y))), z, x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(t - x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y, 2.15e+75], N[(N[(y * N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * z + x), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 2.1500000000000001e75

   1. Initial program 95.8%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 95.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) + x} \]

      2. *-commutative 95.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} + x \]

      3. associate-*r* 99.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot y\right) \cdot z} + x \]

      4. fma-def 99.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot y, z, x\right)} \]

   3. Applied egg-rr 99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \cdot y, z, x\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 29.3%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)} \cdot y, z, x\right) \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/r* 29.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right) \cdot y, z, x\right) \]

      2. div-sub 29.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}} \cdot y, z, x\right) \]

      3. rec-exp 29.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} \cdot y, z, x\right) \]

      4. rec-exp 29.3%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}} \cdot y, z, x\right) \]

      5. tanh-def-a 81.0%

         \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \cdot y, z, x\right) \]

   6. Simplified 81.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \cdot y, z, x\right) \]

   if 2.1500000000000001e75 < y

   1. Initial program 76.0%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around inf 88.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 82.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.15 \cdot 10^{+75}:\\ \;\;\;\;\mathsf{fma}\left(y \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right), z, x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 81.4% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 6 \cdot 10^{+65}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 6e+65) (+ x (* (tanh (/ t y)) (* y z))) (+ x (* z (- t x)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 6e+65) {
		tmp = x + (tanh((t / y)) * (y * z));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 6d+65) then
        tmp = x + (tanh((t / y)) * (y * z))
    else
        tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 6e+65) {
		tmp = x + (Math.tanh((t / y)) * (y * z));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 6e+65:
		tmp = x + (math.tanh((t / y)) * (y * z))
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 6e+65)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) * Float64(y * z)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(t - x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 6e+65)
		tmp = x + (tanh((t / y)) * (y * z));
	else
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y, 6e+65], N[(x + N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 6.0000000000000004e65

   1. Initial program 95.8%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 29.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(\left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right) \cdot z\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 29.0%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}\right)}\right)\right)} \]

      2. associate-/r* 29.0%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}} - \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right)\right) \]

      3. div-sub 29.0%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}}\right) \]

      4. rec-exp 29.0%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \frac{1}{e^{\frac{t}{y}}}}\right) \]

      5. rec-exp 29.0%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \frac{e^{\frac{t}{y}} - e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}{e^{\frac{t}{y}} + \color{blue}{e^{-\frac{t}{y}}}}\right) \]

      6. tanh-def-a 80.9%

         \[\leadsto x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \color{blue}{\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)}\right) \]

   4. Simplified 78.8%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right)} \]

   if 6.0000000000000004e65 < y

   1. Initial program 76.4%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around inf 88.1%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 80.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 6 \cdot 10^{+65}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 64.6% accurate, 19.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.05 \cdot 10^{-42}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 2.15 \cdot 10^{+86} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 2.6 \cdot 10^{+130}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + t \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - x \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 1.05e-42)
   x
   (if (or (<= y 2.15e+86) (not (<= y 2.6e+130)))
     (+ x (* t z))
     (- x (* x z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.05e-42) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if ((y <= 2.15e+86) || !(y <= 2.6e+130)) {
		tmp = x + (t * z);
	} else {
		tmp = x - (x * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 1.05d-42) then
        tmp = x
    else if ((y <= 2.15d+86) .or. (.not. (y <= 2.6d+130))) then
        tmp = x + (t * z)
    else
        tmp = x - (x * z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 1.05e-42) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if ((y <= 2.15e+86) || !(y <= 2.6e+130)) {
		tmp = x + (t * z);
	} else {
		tmp = x - (x * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 1.05e-42:
		tmp = x
	elif (y <= 2.15e+86) or not (y <= 2.6e+130):
		tmp = x + (t * z)
	else:
		tmp = x - (x * z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 1.05e-42)
		tmp = x;
	elseif ((y <= 2.15e+86) || !(y <= 2.6e+130))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(t * z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(x * z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 1.05e-42)
		tmp = x;
	elseif ((y <= 2.15e+86) || ~((y <= 2.6e+130)))
		tmp = x + (t * z);
	else
		tmp = x - (x * z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y, 1.05e-42], x, If[Or[LessEqual[y, 2.15e+86], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 2.6e+130]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x - N[(x * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < 1.05000000000000003e-42

   1. Initial program 95.3%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 65.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 1.05000000000000003e-42 < y < 2.1500000000000001e86 or 2.5999999999999998e130 < y

   1. Initial program 83.1%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around inf 81.2%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in t around inf 70.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]

   if 2.1500000000000001e86 < y < 2.5999999999999998e130

   1. Initial program 82.5%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around inf 78.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in t around 0 62.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(z \cdot x\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 62.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot z\right) \cdot x} \]

      2. mul-1-neg 62.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)} \cdot x \]

   5. Simplified 62.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-z\right) \cdot x} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in x around 0 62.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot z + 1\right) \cdot x} \]
   7. Step-by-step derivation

      1. distribute-rgt1-in 62.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(-1 \cdot z\right) \cdot x} \]

      2. mul-1-neg 62.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-z\right)} \cdot x \]

      3. cancel-sign-sub-inv 62.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - z \cdot x} \]

   8. Simplified 62.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - z \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 66.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 1.05 \cdot 10^{-42}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 2.15 \cdot 10^{+86} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 2.6 \cdot 10^{+130}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + t \cdot z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - x \cdot z\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6: 68.4% accurate, 23.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 9.5 \cdot 10^{-43}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y 9.5e-43) x (+ x (* z (- t x)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 9.5e-43) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 9.5d-43) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 9.5e-43) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 9.5e-43:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 9.5e-43)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(t - x)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 9.5e-43)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = x + (z * (t - x));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y, 9.5e-43], x, N[(x + N[(z * N[(t - x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 9.50000000000000044e-43

   1. Initial program 95.3%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 65.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 9.50000000000000044e-43 < y

   1. Initial program 83.0%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around inf 80.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 69.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 9.5 \cdot 10^{-43}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(t - x\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 7: 64.8% accurate, 30.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.6 \cdot 10^{-43}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + t \cdot z\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (if (<= y 2.6e-43) x (+ x (* t z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 2.6e-43) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (t * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= 2.6d-43) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = x + (t * z)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= 2.6e-43) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x + (t * z);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= 2.6e-43:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = x + (t * z)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= 2.6e-43)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(t * z));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= 2.6e-43)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = x + (t * z);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[y, 2.6e-43], x, N[(x + N[(t * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < 2.6e-43

   1. Initial program 95.3%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 65.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 2.6e-43 < y

   1. Initial program 83.0%

      \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around inf 80.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(t - x\right)} \]

   3. Taylor expanded in t around inf 65.2%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{t \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 65.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq 2.6 \cdot 10^{-43}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + t \cdot z\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 8: 60.3% accurate, 213.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 91.9%

   \[x + \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right) \]

2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 58.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

3. Final simplification 58.1%

   \[\leadsto x \]

Developer target: 97.1% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + y \cdot \left(z \cdot \left(\tanh \left(\frac{t}{y}\right) - \tanh \left(\frac{x}{y}\right)\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (* y (* z (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + (y * (z * (Math.tanh((t / y)) - Math.tanh((x / y)))));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + (y * (z * (math.tanh((t / y)) - math.tanh((x / y)))))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(z * Float64(tanh(Float64(t / y)) - tanh(Float64(x / y))))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + (y * (z * (tanh((t / y)) - tanh((x / y)))));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(y * N[(z * N[(N[Tanh[N[(t / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Tanh[N[(x / y), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023279 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "SynthBasics:moogVCF from YampaSynth-0.2"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (+ x (* y (* z (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))

  (+ x (* (* y z) (- (tanh (/ t y)) (tanh (/ x y))))))