expq3 (problem 3.4.2)

Percentage Accurate: 6.6% → 96.6%
Time: 15.4s
Alternatives: 5
Speedup: 107.0×

Specification

?
\[-1 < \varepsilon \land \varepsilon < 1\]
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (a b eps)
 :precision binary64
 (/
  (* eps (- (exp (* (+ a b) eps)) 1.0))
  (* (- (exp (* a eps)) 1.0) (- (exp (* b eps)) 1.0))))
double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return (eps * (exp(((a + b) * eps)) - 1.0)) / ((exp((a * eps)) - 1.0) * (exp((b * eps)) - 1.0));
}
real(8) function code(a, b, eps)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps
    code = (eps * (exp(((a + b) * eps)) - 1.0d0)) / ((exp((a * eps)) - 1.0d0) * (exp((b * eps)) - 1.0d0))
end function
public static double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return (eps * (Math.exp(((a + b) * eps)) - 1.0)) / ((Math.exp((a * eps)) - 1.0) * (Math.exp((b * eps)) - 1.0));
}
def code(a, b, eps):
	return (eps * (math.exp(((a + b) * eps)) - 1.0)) / ((math.exp((a * eps)) - 1.0) * (math.exp((b * eps)) - 1.0))
function code(a, b, eps)
	return Float64(Float64(eps * Float64(exp(Float64(Float64(a + b) * eps)) - 1.0)) / Float64(Float64(exp(Float64(a * eps)) - 1.0) * Float64(exp(Float64(b * eps)) - 1.0)))
end
function tmp = code(a, b, eps)
	tmp = (eps * (exp(((a + b) * eps)) - 1.0)) / ((exp((a * eps)) - 1.0) * (exp((b * eps)) - 1.0));
end
code[a_, b_, eps_] := N[(N[(eps * N[(N[Exp[N[(N[(a + b), $MachinePrecision] * eps), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[Exp[N[(a * eps), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Exp[N[(b * eps), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary64 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 5 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 6.6% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (a b eps)
 :precision binary64
 (/
  (* eps (- (exp (* (+ a b) eps)) 1.0))
  (* (- (exp (* a eps)) 1.0) (- (exp (* b eps)) 1.0))))
double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return (eps * (exp(((a + b) * eps)) - 1.0)) / ((exp((a * eps)) - 1.0) * (exp((b * eps)) - 1.0));
}
real(8) function code(a, b, eps)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps
    code = (eps * (exp(((a + b) * eps)) - 1.0d0)) / ((exp((a * eps)) - 1.0d0) * (exp((b * eps)) - 1.0d0))
end function
public static double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return (eps * (Math.exp(((a + b) * eps)) - 1.0)) / ((Math.exp((a * eps)) - 1.0) * (Math.exp((b * eps)) - 1.0));
}
def code(a, b, eps):
	return (eps * (math.exp(((a + b) * eps)) - 1.0)) / ((math.exp((a * eps)) - 1.0) * (math.exp((b * eps)) - 1.0))
function code(a, b, eps)
	return Float64(Float64(eps * Float64(exp(Float64(Float64(a + b) * eps)) - 1.0)) / Float64(Float64(exp(Float64(a * eps)) - 1.0) * Float64(exp(Float64(b * eps)) - 1.0)))
end
function tmp = code(a, b, eps)
	tmp = (eps * (exp(((a + b) * eps)) - 1.0)) / ((exp((a * eps)) - 1.0) * (exp((b * eps)) - 1.0));
end
code[a_, b_, eps_] := N[(N[(eps * N[(N[Exp[N[(N[(a + b), $MachinePrecision] * eps), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[Exp[N[(a * eps), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Exp[N[(b * eps), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 96.6% accurate, 21.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(0.5 \cdot \varepsilon + \frac{1}{b}\right) + \frac{1}{a}\right) - 0.5 \cdot \varepsilon \end{array} \]
(FPCore (a b eps)
 :precision binary64
 (- (+ (+ (* 0.5 eps) (/ 1.0 b)) (/ 1.0 a)) (* 0.5 eps)))
double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return (((0.5 * eps) + (1.0 / b)) + (1.0 / a)) - (0.5 * eps);
}
real(8) function code(a, b, eps)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps
    code = (((0.5d0 * eps) + (1.0d0 / b)) + (1.0d0 / a)) - (0.5d0 * eps)
end function
public static double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return (((0.5 * eps) + (1.0 / b)) + (1.0 / a)) - (0.5 * eps);
}
def code(a, b, eps):
	return (((0.5 * eps) + (1.0 / b)) + (1.0 / a)) - (0.5 * eps)
function code(a, b, eps)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(0.5 * eps) + Float64(1.0 / b)) + Float64(1.0 / a)) - Float64(0.5 * eps))
end
function tmp = code(a, b, eps)
	tmp = (((0.5 * eps) + (1.0 / b)) + (1.0 / a)) - (0.5 * eps);
end
code[a_, b_, eps_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(0.5 * eps), $MachinePrecision] + N[(1.0 / b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(1.0 / a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(0.5 * eps), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(\left(0.5 \cdot \varepsilon + \frac{1}{b}\right) + \frac{1}{a}\right) - 0.5 \cdot \varepsilon
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 6.3%

    \[\frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-commutative6.3%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}{\color{blue}{\left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}} \]
    2. associate-*l/6.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]
    3. *-commutative6.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}} \]
    4. expm1-def7.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon\right)} \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]
    5. *-commutative7.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)}\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]
    6. associate-/r*7.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\varepsilon}{e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1}}{e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1}} \]
    7. expm1-def16.2%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\frac{\varepsilon}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(b \cdot \varepsilon\right)}}}{e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1} \]
    8. *-commutative16.2%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot b}\right)}}{e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1} \]
    9. expm1-def51.6%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot b\right)}}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(a \cdot \varepsilon\right)}} \]
    10. *-commutative51.6%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot b\right)}}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot a}\right)} \]
  3. Simplified51.6%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot b\right)}}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right)}} \]
  4. Taylor expanded in a around 0 16.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{\varepsilon \cdot e^{\varepsilon \cdot b}}{e^{\varepsilon \cdot b} - 1} + \frac{1}{a}\right) - 0.5 \cdot \varepsilon} \]
  5. Taylor expanded in eps around 0 97.3%

    \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \varepsilon + \frac{1}{b}\right)} + \frac{1}{a}\right) - 0.5 \cdot \varepsilon \]
  6. Final simplification97.3%

    \[\leadsto \left(\left(0.5 \cdot \varepsilon + \frac{1}{b}\right) + \frac{1}{a}\right) - 0.5 \cdot \varepsilon \]

Alternative 2: 96.9% accurate, 21.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\frac{1}{a} + \left(\frac{1}{b} + \varepsilon \cdot -0.5\right)\right) - 0.5 \cdot \varepsilon \end{array} \]
(FPCore (a b eps)
 :precision binary64
 (- (+ (/ 1.0 a) (+ (/ 1.0 b) (* eps -0.5))) (* 0.5 eps)))
double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return ((1.0 / a) + ((1.0 / b) + (eps * -0.5))) - (0.5 * eps);
}
real(8) function code(a, b, eps)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps
    code = ((1.0d0 / a) + ((1.0d0 / b) + (eps * (-0.5d0)))) - (0.5d0 * eps)
end function
public static double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return ((1.0 / a) + ((1.0 / b) + (eps * -0.5))) - (0.5 * eps);
}
def code(a, b, eps):
	return ((1.0 / a) + ((1.0 / b) + (eps * -0.5))) - (0.5 * eps)
function code(a, b, eps)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(1.0 / a) + Float64(Float64(1.0 / b) + Float64(eps * -0.5))) - Float64(0.5 * eps))
end
function tmp = code(a, b, eps)
	tmp = ((1.0 / a) + ((1.0 / b) + (eps * -0.5))) - (0.5 * eps);
end
code[a_, b_, eps_] := N[(N[(N[(1.0 / a), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(1.0 / b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(eps * -0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(0.5 * eps), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(\frac{1}{a} + \left(\frac{1}{b} + \varepsilon \cdot -0.5\right)\right) - 0.5 \cdot \varepsilon
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 6.3%

    \[\frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-commutative6.3%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}{\color{blue}{\left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}} \]
    2. associate-*l/6.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]
    3. *-commutative6.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}} \]
    4. expm1-def7.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon\right)} \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]
    5. *-commutative7.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)}\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]
    6. associate-/r*7.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\varepsilon}{e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1}}{e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1}} \]
    7. expm1-def16.2%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\frac{\varepsilon}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(b \cdot \varepsilon\right)}}}{e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1} \]
    8. *-commutative16.2%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot b}\right)}}{e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1} \]
    9. expm1-def51.6%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot b\right)}}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(a \cdot \varepsilon\right)}} \]
    10. *-commutative51.6%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot b\right)}}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot a}\right)} \]
  3. Simplified51.6%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot b\right)}}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right)}} \]
  4. Taylor expanded in a around 0 16.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{\varepsilon \cdot e^{\varepsilon \cdot b}}{e^{\varepsilon \cdot b} - 1} + \frac{1}{a}\right) - 0.5 \cdot \varepsilon} \]
  5. Taylor expanded in eps around 0 16.1%

    \[\leadsto \left(\frac{\color{blue}{\varepsilon}}{e^{\varepsilon \cdot b} - 1} + \frac{1}{a}\right) - 0.5 \cdot \varepsilon \]
  6. Taylor expanded in eps around 0 96.8%

    \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(-0.5 \cdot \varepsilon + \frac{1}{b}\right)} + \frac{1}{a}\right) - 0.5 \cdot \varepsilon \]
  7. Final simplification96.8%

    \[\leadsto \left(\frac{1}{a} + \left(\frac{1}{b} + \varepsilon \cdot -0.5\right)\right) - 0.5 \cdot \varepsilon \]

Alternative 3: 94.6% accurate, 45.9× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{1}{b} + \frac{1}{a} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (a b eps) :precision binary64 (+ (/ 1.0 b) (/ 1.0 a)))
double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return (1.0 / b) + (1.0 / a);
}
real(8) function code(a, b, eps)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps
    code = (1.0d0 / b) + (1.0d0 / a)
end function
public static double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return (1.0 / b) + (1.0 / a);
}
def code(a, b, eps):
	return (1.0 / b) + (1.0 / a)
function code(a, b, eps)
	return Float64(Float64(1.0 / b) + Float64(1.0 / a))
end
function tmp = code(a, b, eps)
	tmp = (1.0 / b) + (1.0 / a);
end
code[a_, b_, eps_] := N[(N[(1.0 / b), $MachinePrecision] + N[(1.0 / a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\frac{1}{b} + \frac{1}{a}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 6.3%

    \[\frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-commutative6.3%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}{\color{blue}{\left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}} \]
    2. associate-*l/6.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]
    3. *-commutative6.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}} \]
    4. expm1-def7.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon\right)} \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]
    5. *-commutative7.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)}\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]
    6. associate-/r*7.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\varepsilon}{e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1}}{e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1}} \]
    7. expm1-def16.2%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\frac{\varepsilon}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(b \cdot \varepsilon\right)}}}{e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1} \]
    8. *-commutative16.2%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot b}\right)}}{e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1} \]
    9. expm1-def51.6%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot b\right)}}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(a \cdot \varepsilon\right)}} \]
    10. *-commutative51.6%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot b\right)}}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot a}\right)} \]
  3. Simplified51.6%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot b\right)}}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right)}} \]
  4. Taylor expanded in eps around 0 77.7%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{a + b}{a \cdot b}} \]
  5. Taylor expanded in a around 0 95.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{b} + \frac{1}{a}} \]
  6. Final simplification95.1%

    \[\leadsto \frac{1}{b} + \frac{1}{a} \]

Alternative 4: 60.1% accurate, 63.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq 6.5 \cdot 10^{-108}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{b}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{a}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (a b eps) :precision binary64 (if (<= b 6.5e-108) (/ 1.0 b) (/ 1.0 a)))
double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	double tmp;
	if (b <= 6.5e-108) {
		tmp = 1.0 / b;
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 / a;
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(a, b, eps)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (b <= 6.5d-108) then
        tmp = 1.0d0 / b
    else
        tmp = 1.0d0 / a
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	double tmp;
	if (b <= 6.5e-108) {
		tmp = 1.0 / b;
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 / a;
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(a, b, eps):
	tmp = 0
	if b <= 6.5e-108:
		tmp = 1.0 / b
	else:
		tmp = 1.0 / a
	return tmp
function code(a, b, eps)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (b <= 6.5e-108)
		tmp = Float64(1.0 / b);
	else
		tmp = Float64(1.0 / a);
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(a, b, eps)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (b <= 6.5e-108)
		tmp = 1.0 / b;
	else
		tmp = 1.0 / a;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[a_, b_, eps_] := If[LessEqual[b, 6.5e-108], N[(1.0 / b), $MachinePrecision], N[(1.0 / a), $MachinePrecision]]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;b \leq 6.5 \cdot 10^{-108}:\\
\;\;\;\;\frac{1}{b}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;\frac{1}{a}\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if b < 6.5000000000000002e-108

    1. Initial program 5.5%

      \[\frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutative5.5%

        \[\leadsto \frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}{\color{blue}{\left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}} \]
      2. associate-*l/5.5%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]
      3. *-commutative5.5%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}} \]
      4. expm1-def7.1%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon\right)} \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]
      5. *-commutative7.1%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)}\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]
      6. associate-/r*7.1%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\varepsilon}{e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1}}{e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1}} \]
      7. expm1-def15.3%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\frac{\varepsilon}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(b \cdot \varepsilon\right)}}}{e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1} \]
      8. *-commutative15.3%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot b}\right)}}{e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1} \]
      9. expm1-def46.3%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot b\right)}}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(a \cdot \varepsilon\right)}} \]
      10. *-commutative46.3%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot b\right)}}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot a}\right)} \]
    3. Simplified46.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot b\right)}}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right)}} \]
    4. Taylor expanded in b around 0 56.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{b}} \]

    if 6.5000000000000002e-108 < b

    1. Initial program 8.3%

      \[\frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutative8.3%

        \[\leadsto \frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}{\color{blue}{\left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}} \]
      2. associate-*l/8.3%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]
      3. *-commutative8.3%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}} \]
      4. expm1-def9.6%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon\right)} \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]
      5. *-commutative9.6%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)}\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]
      6. associate-/r*9.6%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\varepsilon}{e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1}}{e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1}} \]
      7. expm1-def18.5%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\frac{\varepsilon}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(b \cdot \varepsilon\right)}}}{e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1} \]
      8. *-commutative18.5%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot b}\right)}}{e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1} \]
      9. expm1-def64.8%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot b\right)}}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(a \cdot \varepsilon\right)}} \]
      10. *-commutative64.8%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot b\right)}}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot a}\right)} \]
    3. Simplified64.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot b\right)}}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right)}} \]
    4. Taylor expanded in a around 0 63.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{a}} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification58.0%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;b \leq 6.5 \cdot 10^{-108}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{b}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{a}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 47.6% accurate, 107.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{1}{a} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (a b eps) :precision binary64 (/ 1.0 a))
double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return 1.0 / a;
}
real(8) function code(a, b, eps)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps
    code = 1.0d0 / a
end function
public static double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return 1.0 / a;
}
def code(a, b, eps):
	return 1.0 / a
function code(a, b, eps)
	return Float64(1.0 / a)
end
function tmp = code(a, b, eps)
	tmp = 1.0 / a;
end
code[a_, b_, eps_] := N[(1.0 / a), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\frac{1}{a}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 6.3%

    \[\frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}{\left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-commutative6.3%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\varepsilon \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}{\color{blue}{\left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}} \]
    2. associate-*l/6.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \cdot \left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]
    3. *-commutative6.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(e^{\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)}} \]
    4. expm1-def7.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\left(a + b\right) \cdot \varepsilon\right)} \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]
    5. *-commutative7.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)}\right) \cdot \frac{\varepsilon}{\left(e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right) \cdot \left(e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1\right)} \]
    6. associate-/r*7.8%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\varepsilon}{e^{b \cdot \varepsilon} - 1}}{e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1}} \]
    7. expm1-def16.2%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\frac{\varepsilon}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(b \cdot \varepsilon\right)}}}{e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1} \]
    8. *-commutative16.2%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot b}\right)}}{e^{a \cdot \varepsilon} - 1} \]
    9. expm1-def51.6%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot b\right)}}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(a \cdot \varepsilon\right)}} \]
    10. *-commutative51.6%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot b\right)}}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\varepsilon \cdot a}\right)} \]
  3. Simplified51.6%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot \left(a + b\right)\right) \cdot \frac{\frac{\varepsilon}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot b\right)}}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\varepsilon \cdot a\right)}} \]
  4. Taylor expanded in a around 0 47.3%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{a}} \]
  5. Final simplification47.3%

    \[\leadsto \frac{1}{a} \]

Developer target: 77.3% accurate, 45.9× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{a + b}{a \cdot b} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (a b eps) :precision binary64 (/ (+ a b) (* a b)))
double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return (a + b) / (a * b);
}
real(8) function code(a, b, eps)
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    real(8), intent (in) :: b
    real(8), intent (in) :: eps
    code = (a + b) / (a * b)
end function
public static double code(double a, double b, double eps) {
	return (a + b) / (a * b);
}
def code(a, b, eps):
	return (a + b) / (a * b)
function code(a, b, eps)
	return Float64(Float64(a + b) / Float64(a * b))
end
function tmp = code(a, b, eps)
	tmp = (a + b) / (a * b);
end
code[a_, b_, eps_] := N[(N[(a + b), $MachinePrecision] / N[(a * b), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\frac{a + b}{a \cdot b}
\end{array}

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2023279 
(FPCore (a b eps)
  :name "expq3 (problem 3.4.2)"
  :precision binary64
  :pre (and (< -1.0 eps) (< eps 1.0))

  :herbie-target
  (/ (+ a b) (* a b))

  (/ (* eps (- (exp (* (+ a b) eps)) 1.0)) (* (- (exp (* a eps)) 1.0) (- (exp (* b eps)) 1.0))))