HairBSDF, sample_f, cosTheta

Percentage Accurate: 99.5% → 99.4%
Time: 24.2s
Alternatives: 13
Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

?
\[\left(10^{-5} \leq u \land u \leq 1\right) \land \left(0 \leq v \land v \leq 109.746574\right)\]
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u v)
 :precision binary32
 (+ 1.0 (* v (log (+ u (* (- 1.0 u) (exp (/ -2.0 v))))))))
float code(float u, float v) {
	return 1.0f + (v * logf((u + ((1.0f - u) * expf((-2.0f / v))))));
}
real(4) function code(u, v)
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    real(4), intent (in) :: v
    code = 1.0e0 + (v * log((u + ((1.0e0 - u) * exp(((-2.0e0) / v))))))
end function
function code(u, v)
	return Float32(Float32(1.0) + Float32(v * log(Float32(u + Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u) * exp(Float32(Float32(-2.0) / v)))))))
end
function tmp = code(u, v)
	tmp = single(1.0) + (v * log((u + ((single(1.0) - u) * exp((single(-2.0) / v))))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary32 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 13 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 99.5% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u v)
 :precision binary32
 (+ 1.0 (* v (log (+ u (* (- 1.0 u) (exp (/ -2.0 v))))))))
float code(float u, float v) {
	return 1.0f + (v * logf((u + ((1.0f - u) * expf((-2.0f / v))))));
}
real(4) function code(u, v)
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    real(4), intent (in) :: v
    code = 1.0e0 + (v * log((u + ((1.0e0 - u) * exp(((-2.0e0) / v))))))
end function
function code(u, v)
	return Float32(Float32(1.0) + Float32(v * log(Float32(u + Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u) * exp(Float32(Float32(-2.0) / v)))))))
end
function tmp = code(u, v)
	tmp = single(1.0) + (v * log((u + ((single(1.0) - u) * exp((single(-2.0) / v))))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 99.4% accurate, 0.5× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := e^{\frac{-2}{v}} \cdot \left(1 - u\right)\\ 1 - v \cdot \log \left(\frac{u - t_0}{u \cdot u - {t_0}^{2}}\right) \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u v)
 :precision binary32
 (let* ((t_0 (* (exp (/ -2.0 v)) (- 1.0 u))))
   (- 1.0 (* v (log (/ (- u t_0) (- (* u u) (pow t_0 2.0))))))))
float code(float u, float v) {
	float t_0 = expf((-2.0f / v)) * (1.0f - u);
	return 1.0f - (v * logf(((u - t_0) / ((u * u) - powf(t_0, 2.0f)))));
}
real(4) function code(u, v)
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    real(4), intent (in) :: v
    real(4) :: t_0
    t_0 = exp(((-2.0e0) / v)) * (1.0e0 - u)
    code = 1.0e0 - (v * log(((u - t_0) / ((u * u) - (t_0 ** 2.0e0)))))
end function
function code(u, v)
	t_0 = Float32(exp(Float32(Float32(-2.0) / v)) * Float32(Float32(1.0) - u))
	return Float32(Float32(1.0) - Float32(v * log(Float32(Float32(u - t_0) / Float32(Float32(u * u) - (t_0 ^ Float32(2.0)))))))
end
function tmp = code(u, v)
	t_0 = exp((single(-2.0) / v)) * (single(1.0) - u);
	tmp = single(1.0) - (v * log(((u - t_0) / ((u * u) - (t_0 ^ single(2.0))))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := e^{\frac{-2}{v}} \cdot \left(1 - u\right)\\
1 - v \cdot \log \left(\frac{u - t_0}{u \cdot u - {t_0}^{2}}\right)
\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.5%

    \[1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. flip-+99.5%

      \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{u \cdot u - \left(\left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \cdot \left(\left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)}{u - \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}}\right)} \]
    2. clear-num99.5%

      \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{\frac{u - \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}}{u \cdot u - \left(\left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \cdot \left(\left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)}}\right)} \]
    3. log-div99.6%

      \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log 1 - \log \left(\frac{u - \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}}{u \cdot u - \left(\left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \cdot \left(\left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)}\right)\right)} \]
    4. metadata-eval99.6%

      \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \left(\color{blue}{0} - \log \left(\frac{u - \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}}{u \cdot u - \left(\left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \cdot \left(\left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)}\right)\right) \]
    5. pow299.6%

      \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \left(0 - \log \left(\frac{u - \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}}{u \cdot u - \color{blue}{{\left(\left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)}^{2}}}\right)\right) \]
  3. Applied egg-rr99.6%

    \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0 - \log \left(\frac{u - \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}}{u \cdot u - {\left(\left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)}^{2}}\right)\right)} \]
  4. Taylor expanded in v around 0 99.5%

    \[\leadsto 1 + \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(v \cdot \log \left(\frac{u - \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}}{{u}^{2} - {\left(1 - u\right)}^{2} \cdot {\left(e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)}^{2}}\right)\right)} \]
  5. Step-by-step derivation
    1. mul-1-neg99.5%

      \[\leadsto 1 + \color{blue}{\left(-v \cdot \log \left(\frac{u - \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}}{{u}^{2} - {\left(1 - u\right)}^{2} \cdot {\left(e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)}^{2}}\right)\right)} \]
    2. log-div93.7%

      \[\leadsto 1 + \left(-v \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log \left(u - \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) - \log \left({u}^{2} - {\left(1 - u\right)}^{2} \cdot {\left(e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)}^{2}\right)\right)}\right) \]
    3. unpow293.7%

      \[\leadsto 1 + \left(-v \cdot \left(\log \left(u - \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) - \log \left({u}^{2} - \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - u\right) \cdot \left(1 - u\right)\right)} \cdot {\left(e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)}^{2}\right)\right)\right) \]
    4. unpow293.7%

      \[\leadsto 1 + \left(-v \cdot \left(\log \left(u - \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) - \log \left({u}^{2} - \left(\left(1 - u\right) \cdot \left(1 - u\right)\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(e^{\frac{-2}{v}} \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)}\right)\right)\right) \]
    5. swap-sqr93.7%

      \[\leadsto 1 + \left(-v \cdot \left(\log \left(u - \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) - \log \left({u}^{2} - \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \cdot \left(\left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)}\right)\right)\right) \]
    6. unpow293.7%

      \[\leadsto 1 + \left(-v \cdot \left(\log \left(u - \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) - \log \left({u}^{2} - \color{blue}{{\left(\left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)}^{2}}\right)\right)\right) \]
    7. unpow293.7%

      \[\leadsto 1 + \left(-v \cdot \left(\log \left(u - \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) - \log \left(\color{blue}{u \cdot u} - {\left(\left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)}^{2}\right)\right)\right) \]
    8. log-div99.6%

      \[\leadsto 1 + \left(-v \cdot \color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{u - \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}}{u \cdot u - {\left(\left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)}^{2}}\right)}\right) \]
  6. Simplified99.6%

    \[\leadsto 1 + \color{blue}{v \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{u - e^{\frac{-2}{v}} \cdot \left(1 - u\right)}{u \cdot u - {\left(e^{\frac{-2}{v}} \cdot \left(1 - u\right)\right)}^{2}}\right)\right)} \]
  7. Final simplification99.6%

    \[\leadsto 1 - v \cdot \log \left(\frac{u - e^{\frac{-2}{v}} \cdot \left(1 - u\right)}{u \cdot u - {\left(e^{\frac{-2}{v}} \cdot \left(1 - u\right)\right)}^{2}}\right) \]

Alternative 2: 99.5% accurate, 0.5× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(v, \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right), 1\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u v)
 :precision binary32
 (fma v (log (fma (- 1.0 u) (exp (/ -2.0 v)) u)) 1.0))
float code(float u, float v) {
	return fmaf(v, logf(fmaf((1.0f - u), expf((-2.0f / v)), u)), 1.0f);
}
function code(u, v)
	return fma(v, log(fma(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u), exp(Float32(Float32(-2.0) / v)), u)), Float32(1.0))
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\mathsf{fma}\left(v, \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right), 1\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.5%

    \[1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) + 1} \]
    2. fma-def99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(v, \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right), 1\right)} \]
    3. +-commutative99.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(v, \log \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}} + u\right)}, 1\right) \]
    4. fma-def99.6%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(v, \log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right)}, 1\right) \]
  3. Simplified99.6%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(v, \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right), 1\right)} \]
  4. Final simplification99.6%

    \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(v, \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right), 1\right) \]

Alternative 3: 99.5% accurate, 0.7× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 1 + v \cdot \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u v)
 :precision binary32
 (+ 1.0 (* v (log (fma (- 1.0 u) (exp (/ -2.0 v)) u)))))
float code(float u, float v) {
	return 1.0f + (v * logf(fmaf((1.0f - u), expf((-2.0f / v)), u)));
}
function code(u, v)
	return Float32(Float32(1.0) + Float32(v * log(fma(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u), exp(Float32(Float32(-2.0) / v)), u))))
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
1 + v \cdot \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.5%

    \[1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \]
  2. Taylor expanded in v around 0 99.5%

    \[\leadsto 1 + \color{blue}{\log \left(\left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}} + u\right) \cdot v} \]
  3. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-commutative99.5%

      \[\leadsto 1 + \color{blue}{v \cdot \log \left(\left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}} + u\right)} \]
    2. fma-def99.6%

      \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right)} \]
  4. Simplified99.6%

    \[\leadsto 1 + \color{blue}{v \cdot \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right)} \]
  5. Final simplification99.6%

    \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right) \]

Alternative 4: 99.5% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + e^{\frac{-2}{v}} \cdot \left(1 - u\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u v)
 :precision binary32
 (+ 1.0 (* v (log (+ u (* (exp (/ -2.0 v)) (- 1.0 u)))))))
float code(float u, float v) {
	return 1.0f + (v * logf((u + (expf((-2.0f / v)) * (1.0f - u)))));
}
real(4) function code(u, v)
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    real(4), intent (in) :: v
    code = 1.0e0 + (v * log((u + (exp(((-2.0e0) / v)) * (1.0e0 - u)))))
end function
function code(u, v)
	return Float32(Float32(1.0) + Float32(v * log(Float32(u + Float32(exp(Float32(Float32(-2.0) / v)) * Float32(Float32(1.0) - u))))))
end
function tmp = code(u, v)
	tmp = single(1.0) + (v * log((u + (exp((single(-2.0) / v)) * (single(1.0) - u)))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + e^{\frac{-2}{v}} \cdot \left(1 - u\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.5%

    \[1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \]
  2. Final simplification99.5%

    \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + e^{\frac{-2}{v}} \cdot \left(1 - u\right)\right) \]

Alternative 5: 99.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 1 + v \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(1 - u\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\frac{-2}{v}\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u v)
 :precision binary32
 (+ 1.0 (* v (log1p (* (- 1.0 u) (expm1 (/ -2.0 v)))))))
float code(float u, float v) {
	return 1.0f + (v * log1pf(((1.0f - u) * expm1f((-2.0f / v)))));
}
function code(u, v)
	return Float32(Float32(1.0) + Float32(v * log1p(Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u) * expm1(Float32(Float32(-2.0) / v))))))
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
1 + v \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(1 - u\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\frac{-2}{v}\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.5%

    \[1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. log1p-expm1-u99.0%

      \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\mathsf{expm1}\left(\log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)\right)\right)} \]
    2. expm1-udef99.0%

      \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{e^{\log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)} - 1}\right) \]
    3. add-exp-log99.0%

      \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)} - 1\right) \]
    4. +-commutative99.0%

      \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}} + u\right)} - 1\right) \]
    5. fma-udef99.1%

      \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)} - 1\right) \]
  3. Applied egg-rr99.1%

    \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right) - 1\right)} \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. fma-def99.0%

      \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}} + u\right)} - 1\right) \]
    2. +-commutative99.0%

      \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)} - 1\right) \]
    3. associate--l+99.0%

      \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{u + \left(\left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}} - 1\right)}\right) \]
    4. fma-neg99.1%

      \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(u + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, -1\right)}\right) \]
    5. metadata-eval99.1%

      \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(u + \mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, \color{blue}{-1}\right)\right) \]
  5. Simplified99.1%

    \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(u + \mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, -1\right)\right)} \]
  6. Taylor expanded in u around -inf 99.0%

    \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(e^{\frac{-2}{v}} - 1\right)\right) + e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) - 1}\right) \]
  7. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate--l+99.0%

      \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(e^{\frac{-2}{v}} - 1\right)\right) + \left(e^{\frac{-2}{v}} - 1\right)}\right) \]
    2. associate-*r*99.0%

      \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot u\right) \cdot \left(e^{\frac{-2}{v}} - 1\right)} + \left(e^{\frac{-2}{v}} - 1\right)\right) \]
    3. neg-mul-199.0%

      \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-u\right)} \cdot \left(e^{\frac{-2}{v}} - 1\right) + \left(e^{\frac{-2}{v}} - 1\right)\right) \]
    4. expm1-def99.0%

      \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-u\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\frac{-2}{v}\right)} + \left(e^{\frac{-2}{v}} - 1\right)\right) \]
    5. expm1-def99.2%

      \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-u\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\frac{-2}{v}\right) + \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\frac{-2}{v}\right)}\right) \]
  8. Simplified99.2%

    \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-u\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\frac{-2}{v}\right) + \mathsf{expm1}\left(\frac{-2}{v}\right)}\right) \]
  9. Taylor expanded in u around 0 99.0%

    \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(e^{\frac{-2}{v}} - 1\right)\right) + e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) - 1}\right) \]
  10. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate--l+99.0%

      \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(e^{\frac{-2}{v}} - 1\right)\right) + \left(e^{\frac{-2}{v}} - 1\right)}\right) \]
    2. expm1-def99.0%

      \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(-1 \cdot \left(u \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\frac{-2}{v}\right)}\right) + \left(e^{\frac{-2}{v}} - 1\right)\right) \]
    3. associate-*r*99.0%

      \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot u\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\frac{-2}{v}\right)} + \left(e^{\frac{-2}{v}} - 1\right)\right) \]
    4. neg-mul-199.0%

      \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-u\right)} \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\frac{-2}{v}\right) + \left(e^{\frac{-2}{v}} - 1\right)\right) \]
    5. expm1-def99.2%

      \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-u\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\frac{-2}{v}\right) + \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\frac{-2}{v}\right)}\right) \]
    6. distribute-lft1-in99.2%

      \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(-u\right) + 1\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\frac{-2}{v}\right)}\right) \]
    7. +-commutative99.2%

      \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-u\right)\right)} \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\frac{-2}{v}\right)\right) \]
    8. sub-neg99.2%

      \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(1 - u\right)} \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\frac{-2}{v}\right)\right) \]
  11. Simplified99.2%

    \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(1 - u\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\frac{-2}{v}\right)}\right) \]
  12. Final simplification99.2%

    \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(1 - u\right) \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\frac{-2}{v}\right)\right) \]

Alternative 6: 90.6% accurate, 1.9× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;v \leq 0.10000000149011612:\\ \;\;\;\;1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-1 - v \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{e^{\frac{-2}{v}}} - -1\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u v)
 :precision binary32
 (if (<= v 0.10000000149011612)
   1.0
   (- -1.0 (* v (* u (- (/ -1.0 (exp (/ -2.0 v))) -1.0))))))
float code(float u, float v) {
	float tmp;
	if (v <= 0.10000000149011612f) {
		tmp = 1.0f;
	} else {
		tmp = -1.0f - (v * (u * ((-1.0f / expf((-2.0f / v))) - -1.0f)));
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(4) function code(u, v)
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    real(4), intent (in) :: v
    real(4) :: tmp
    if (v <= 0.10000000149011612e0) then
        tmp = 1.0e0
    else
        tmp = (-1.0e0) - (v * (u * (((-1.0e0) / exp(((-2.0e0) / v))) - (-1.0e0))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
function code(u, v)
	tmp = Float32(0.0)
	if (v <= Float32(0.10000000149011612))
		tmp = Float32(1.0);
	else
		tmp = Float32(Float32(-1.0) - Float32(v * Float32(u * Float32(Float32(Float32(-1.0) / exp(Float32(Float32(-2.0) / v))) - Float32(-1.0)))));
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(u, v)
	tmp = single(0.0);
	if (v <= single(0.10000000149011612))
		tmp = single(1.0);
	else
		tmp = single(-1.0) - (v * (u * ((single(-1.0) / exp((single(-2.0) / v))) - single(-1.0))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;v \leq 0.10000000149011612:\\
\;\;\;\;1\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;-1 - v \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{e^{\frac{-2}{v}}} - -1\right)\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if v < 0.100000001

    1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. add-cube-cbrt99.6%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt[3]{1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)} \cdot \sqrt[3]{1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)}\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)}} \]
      2. pow399.6%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)}\right)}^{3}} \]
      3. +-commutative99.6%

        \[\leadsto {\left(\sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) + 1}}\right)}^{3} \]
      4. +-commutative99.6%

        \[\leadsto {\left(\sqrt[3]{v \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}} + u\right)} + 1}\right)}^{3} \]
      5. fma-udef99.6%

        \[\leadsto {\left(\sqrt[3]{v \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right)} + 1}\right)}^{3} \]
      6. fma-udef99.6%

        \[\leadsto {\left(\sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(v, \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right), 1\right)}}\right)}^{3} \]
    3. Applied egg-rr99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{\mathsf{fma}\left(v, \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right), 1\right)}\right)}^{3}} \]
    4. Taylor expanded in v around 0 94.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1} \]

    if 0.100000001 < v

    1. Initial program 93.2%

      \[1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \]
    2. Taylor expanded in u around 0 67.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{v \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-2}{v}}} - 1\right)\right) - 1} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification92.7%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;v \leq 0.10000000149011612:\\ \;\;\;\;1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-1 - v \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\frac{-1}{e^{\frac{-2}{v}}} - -1\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 7: 90.6% accurate, 1.9× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;v \leq 0.10000000149011612:\\ \;\;\;\;1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 + \left(v \cdot \left(u \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\frac{2}{v}\right)\right) - 2\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u v)
 :precision binary32
 (if (<= v 0.10000000149011612)
   1.0
   (+ 1.0 (- (* v (* u (expm1 (/ 2.0 v)))) 2.0))))
float code(float u, float v) {
	float tmp;
	if (v <= 0.10000000149011612f) {
		tmp = 1.0f;
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0f + ((v * (u * expm1f((2.0f / v)))) - 2.0f);
	}
	return tmp;
}
function code(u, v)
	tmp = Float32(0.0)
	if (v <= Float32(0.10000000149011612))
		tmp = Float32(1.0);
	else
		tmp = Float32(Float32(1.0) + Float32(Float32(v * Float32(u * expm1(Float32(Float32(2.0) / v)))) - Float32(2.0)));
	end
	return tmp
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;v \leq 0.10000000149011612:\\
\;\;\;\;1\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;1 + \left(v \cdot \left(u \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\frac{2}{v}\right)\right) - 2\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if v < 0.100000001

    1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. add-cube-cbrt99.6%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt[3]{1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)} \cdot \sqrt[3]{1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)}\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)}} \]
      2. pow399.6%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)}\right)}^{3}} \]
      3. +-commutative99.6%

        \[\leadsto {\left(\sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) + 1}}\right)}^{3} \]
      4. +-commutative99.6%

        \[\leadsto {\left(\sqrt[3]{v \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}} + u\right)} + 1}\right)}^{3} \]
      5. fma-udef99.6%

        \[\leadsto {\left(\sqrt[3]{v \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right)} + 1}\right)}^{3} \]
      6. fma-udef99.6%

        \[\leadsto {\left(\sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(v, \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right), 1\right)}}\right)}^{3} \]
    3. Applied egg-rr99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{\mathsf{fma}\left(v, \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right), 1\right)}\right)}^{3}} \]
    4. Taylor expanded in v around 0 94.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1} \]

    if 0.100000001 < v

    1. Initial program 93.2%

      \[1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \]
    2. Taylor expanded in u around 0 67.2%

      \[\leadsto 1 + \color{blue}{\left(v \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-2}{v}}} - 1\right)\right) - 2\right)} \]
    3. Step-by-step derivation
      1. sub-neg67.2%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \left(v \cdot \left(u \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-2}{v}}} + \left(-1\right)\right)}\right) - 2\right) \]
      2. rec-exp67.2%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \left(v \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\color{blue}{e^{-\frac{-2}{v}}} + \left(-1\right)\right)\right) - 2\right) \]
      3. metadata-eval67.2%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \left(v \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(e^{-\frac{-2}{v}} + \color{blue}{-1}\right)\right) - 2\right) \]
    4. Applied egg-rr67.2%

      \[\leadsto 1 + \left(v \cdot \left(u \cdot \color{blue}{\left(e^{-\frac{-2}{v}} + -1\right)}\right) - 2\right) \]
    5. Step-by-step derivation
      1. metadata-eval67.2%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \left(v \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(e^{-\frac{-2}{v}} + \color{blue}{\left(-1\right)}\right)\right) - 2\right) \]
      2. sub-neg67.2%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \left(v \cdot \left(u \cdot \color{blue}{\left(e^{-\frac{-2}{v}} - 1\right)}\right) - 2\right) \]
      3. distribute-neg-frac67.2%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \left(v \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(e^{\color{blue}{\frac{--2}{v}}} - 1\right)\right) - 2\right) \]
      4. metadata-eval67.2%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \left(v \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(e^{\frac{\color{blue}{2}}{v}} - 1\right)\right) - 2\right) \]
      5. metadata-eval67.2%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \left(v \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(e^{\frac{\color{blue}{2 \cdot 1}}{v}} - 1\right)\right) - 2\right) \]
      6. associate-*r/67.2%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \left(v \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(e^{\color{blue}{2 \cdot \frac{1}{v}}} - 1\right)\right) - 2\right) \]
      7. expm1-def67.2%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \left(v \cdot \left(u \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{v}\right)}\right) - 2\right) \]
      8. associate-*r/67.2%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \left(v \cdot \left(u \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{v}}\right)\right) - 2\right) \]
      9. metadata-eval67.2%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \left(v \cdot \left(u \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\frac{\color{blue}{2}}{v}\right)\right) - 2\right) \]
    6. Simplified67.2%

      \[\leadsto 1 + \left(v \cdot \left(u \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\frac{2}{v}\right)}\right) - 2\right) \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification92.6%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;v \leq 0.10000000149011612:\\ \;\;\;\;1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 + \left(v \cdot \left(u \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\frac{2}{v}\right)\right) - 2\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 8: 90.4% accurate, 11.1× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;v \leq 0.10000000149011612:\\ \;\;\;\;1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 + \left(\frac{u}{v} \cdot \left(2 + \frac{1.3333333333333333}{v}\right) - \left(2 + u \cdot -2\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u v)
 :precision binary32
 (if (<= v 0.10000000149011612)
   1.0
   (+
    1.0
    (- (* (/ u v) (+ 2.0 (/ 1.3333333333333333 v))) (+ 2.0 (* u -2.0))))))
float code(float u, float v) {
	float tmp;
	if (v <= 0.10000000149011612f) {
		tmp = 1.0f;
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0f + (((u / v) * (2.0f + (1.3333333333333333f / v))) - (2.0f + (u * -2.0f)));
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(4) function code(u, v)
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    real(4), intent (in) :: v
    real(4) :: tmp
    if (v <= 0.10000000149011612e0) then
        tmp = 1.0e0
    else
        tmp = 1.0e0 + (((u / v) * (2.0e0 + (1.3333333333333333e0 / v))) - (2.0e0 + (u * (-2.0e0))))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
function code(u, v)
	tmp = Float32(0.0)
	if (v <= Float32(0.10000000149011612))
		tmp = Float32(1.0);
	else
		tmp = Float32(Float32(1.0) + Float32(Float32(Float32(u / v) * Float32(Float32(2.0) + Float32(Float32(1.3333333333333333) / v))) - Float32(Float32(2.0) + Float32(u * Float32(-2.0)))));
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(u, v)
	tmp = single(0.0);
	if (v <= single(0.10000000149011612))
		tmp = single(1.0);
	else
		tmp = single(1.0) + (((u / v) * (single(2.0) + (single(1.3333333333333333) / v))) - (single(2.0) + (u * single(-2.0))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;v \leq 0.10000000149011612:\\
\;\;\;\;1\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;1 + \left(\frac{u}{v} \cdot \left(2 + \frac{1.3333333333333333}{v}\right) - \left(2 + u \cdot -2\right)\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if v < 0.100000001

    1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. add-cube-cbrt99.6%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt[3]{1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)} \cdot \sqrt[3]{1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)}\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)}} \]
      2. pow399.6%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)}\right)}^{3}} \]
      3. +-commutative99.6%

        \[\leadsto {\left(\sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) + 1}}\right)}^{3} \]
      4. +-commutative99.6%

        \[\leadsto {\left(\sqrt[3]{v \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}} + u\right)} + 1}\right)}^{3} \]
      5. fma-udef99.6%

        \[\leadsto {\left(\sqrt[3]{v \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right)} + 1}\right)}^{3} \]
      6. fma-udef99.6%

        \[\leadsto {\left(\sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(v, \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right), 1\right)}}\right)}^{3} \]
    3. Applied egg-rr99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{\mathsf{fma}\left(v, \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right), 1\right)}\right)}^{3}} \]
    4. Taylor expanded in v around 0 94.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1} \]

    if 0.100000001 < v

    1. Initial program 93.2%

      \[1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \]
    2. Taylor expanded in u around 0 66.9%

      \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-2}{v}}} - 1\right) - 2 \cdot \frac{1}{v}\right)} \]
    3. Taylor expanded in v around -inf 62.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 + \left(2 \cdot \frac{u}{v} + \left(1.3333333333333333 \cdot \frac{u}{{v}^{2}} + -1 \cdot \left(2 + -2 \cdot u\right)\right)\right)} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-+r+62.9%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \color{blue}{\left(\left(2 \cdot \frac{u}{v} + 1.3333333333333333 \cdot \frac{u}{{v}^{2}}\right) + -1 \cdot \left(2 + -2 \cdot u\right)\right)} \]
      2. mul-1-neg62.9%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \left(\left(2 \cdot \frac{u}{v} + 1.3333333333333333 \cdot \frac{u}{{v}^{2}}\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(2 + -2 \cdot u\right)\right)}\right) \]
      3. unsub-neg62.9%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \color{blue}{\left(\left(2 \cdot \frac{u}{v} + 1.3333333333333333 \cdot \frac{u}{{v}^{2}}\right) - \left(2 + -2 \cdot u\right)\right)} \]
      4. fma-def62.9%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, \frac{u}{v}, 1.3333333333333333 \cdot \frac{u}{{v}^{2}}\right)} - \left(2 + -2 \cdot u\right)\right) \]
      5. associate-*r/62.9%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2, \frac{u}{v}, \color{blue}{\frac{1.3333333333333333 \cdot u}{{v}^{2}}}\right) - \left(2 + -2 \cdot u\right)\right) \]
      6. unpow262.9%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2, \frac{u}{v}, \frac{1.3333333333333333 \cdot u}{\color{blue}{v \cdot v}}\right) - \left(2 + -2 \cdot u\right)\right) \]
      7. times-frac62.9%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2, \frac{u}{v}, \color{blue}{\frac{1.3333333333333333}{v} \cdot \frac{u}{v}}\right) - \left(2 + -2 \cdot u\right)\right) \]
    5. Simplified62.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 + \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(2, \frac{u}{v}, \frac{1.3333333333333333}{v} \cdot \frac{u}{v}\right) - \left(2 + -2 \cdot u\right)\right)} \]
    6. Taylor expanded in v around 0 62.9%

      \[\leadsto 1 + \left(\color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot \frac{u}{v} + 1.3333333333333333 \cdot \frac{u}{{v}^{2}}\right)} - \left(2 + -2 \cdot u\right)\right) \]
    7. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-*r/62.9%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \left(\left(2 \cdot \frac{u}{v} + \color{blue}{\frac{1.3333333333333333 \cdot u}{{v}^{2}}}\right) - \left(2 + -2 \cdot u\right)\right) \]
      2. unpow262.9%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \left(\left(2 \cdot \frac{u}{v} + \frac{1.3333333333333333 \cdot u}{\color{blue}{v \cdot v}}\right) - \left(2 + -2 \cdot u\right)\right) \]
      3. times-frac62.9%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \left(\left(2 \cdot \frac{u}{v} + \color{blue}{\frac{1.3333333333333333}{v} \cdot \frac{u}{v}}\right) - \left(2 + -2 \cdot u\right)\right) \]
      4. +-commutative62.9%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\frac{1.3333333333333333}{v} \cdot \frac{u}{v} + 2 \cdot \frac{u}{v}\right)} - \left(2 + -2 \cdot u\right)\right) \]
      5. distribute-rgt-out62.9%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \left(\color{blue}{\frac{u}{v} \cdot \left(\frac{1.3333333333333333}{v} + 2\right)} - \left(2 + -2 \cdot u\right)\right) \]
    8. Simplified62.9%

      \[\leadsto 1 + \left(\color{blue}{\frac{u}{v} \cdot \left(\frac{1.3333333333333333}{v} + 2\right)} - \left(2 + -2 \cdot u\right)\right) \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification92.3%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;v \leq 0.10000000149011612:\\ \;\;\;\;1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 + \left(\frac{u}{v} \cdot \left(2 + \frac{1.3333333333333333}{v}\right) - \left(2 + u \cdot -2\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 9: 90.1% accurate, 19.1× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;v \leq 0.10000000149011612:\\ \;\;\;\;1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(u + \frac{u}{v}\right) + -1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u v)
 :precision binary32
 (if (<= v 0.10000000149011612) 1.0 (+ (* 2.0 (+ u (/ u v))) -1.0)))
float code(float u, float v) {
	float tmp;
	if (v <= 0.10000000149011612f) {
		tmp = 1.0f;
	} else {
		tmp = (2.0f * (u + (u / v))) + -1.0f;
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(4) function code(u, v)
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    real(4), intent (in) :: v
    real(4) :: tmp
    if (v <= 0.10000000149011612e0) then
        tmp = 1.0e0
    else
        tmp = (2.0e0 * (u + (u / v))) + (-1.0e0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
function code(u, v)
	tmp = Float32(0.0)
	if (v <= Float32(0.10000000149011612))
		tmp = Float32(1.0);
	else
		tmp = Float32(Float32(Float32(2.0) * Float32(u + Float32(u / v))) + Float32(-1.0));
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(u, v)
	tmp = single(0.0);
	if (v <= single(0.10000000149011612))
		tmp = single(1.0);
	else
		tmp = (single(2.0) * (u + (u / v))) + single(-1.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;v \leq 0.10000000149011612:\\
\;\;\;\;1\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(u + \frac{u}{v}\right) + -1\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if v < 0.100000001

    1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. add-cube-cbrt99.6%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt[3]{1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)} \cdot \sqrt[3]{1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)}\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)}} \]
      2. pow399.6%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)}\right)}^{3}} \]
      3. +-commutative99.6%

        \[\leadsto {\left(\sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) + 1}}\right)}^{3} \]
      4. +-commutative99.6%

        \[\leadsto {\left(\sqrt[3]{v \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}} + u\right)} + 1}\right)}^{3} \]
      5. fma-udef99.6%

        \[\leadsto {\left(\sqrt[3]{v \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right)} + 1}\right)}^{3} \]
      6. fma-udef99.6%

        \[\leadsto {\left(\sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(v, \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right), 1\right)}}\right)}^{3} \]
    3. Applied egg-rr99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{\mathsf{fma}\left(v, \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right), 1\right)}\right)}^{3}} \]
    4. Taylor expanded in v around 0 94.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1} \]

    if 0.100000001 < v

    1. Initial program 93.2%

      \[1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \]
    2. Taylor expanded in u around 0 67.2%

      \[\leadsto 1 + \color{blue}{\left(v \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-2}{v}}} - 1\right)\right) - 2\right)} \]
    3. Taylor expanded in v around inf 60.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot u + 2 \cdot \frac{u}{v}\right) - 1} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. sub-neg60.2%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot u + 2 \cdot \frac{u}{v}\right) + \left(-1\right)} \]
      2. distribute-lft-out60.2%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(u + \frac{u}{v}\right)} + \left(-1\right) \]
      3. metadata-eval60.2%

        \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \left(u + \frac{u}{v}\right) + \color{blue}{-1} \]
    5. Simplified60.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(u + \frac{u}{v}\right) + -1} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification92.1%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;v \leq 0.10000000149011612:\\ \;\;\;\;1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \left(u + \frac{u}{v}\right) + -1\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 10: 89.5% accurate, 23.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;v \leq 0.25999999046325684:\\ \;\;\;\;1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 + -2 \cdot \left(1 - u\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u v)
 :precision binary32
 (if (<= v 0.25999999046325684) 1.0 (+ 1.0 (* -2.0 (- 1.0 u)))))
float code(float u, float v) {
	float tmp;
	if (v <= 0.25999999046325684f) {
		tmp = 1.0f;
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0f + (-2.0f * (1.0f - u));
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(4) function code(u, v)
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    real(4), intent (in) :: v
    real(4) :: tmp
    if (v <= 0.25999999046325684e0) then
        tmp = 1.0e0
    else
        tmp = 1.0e0 + ((-2.0e0) * (1.0e0 - u))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
function code(u, v)
	tmp = Float32(0.0)
	if (v <= Float32(0.25999999046325684))
		tmp = Float32(1.0);
	else
		tmp = Float32(Float32(1.0) + Float32(Float32(-2.0) * Float32(Float32(1.0) - u)));
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(u, v)
	tmp = single(0.0);
	if (v <= single(0.25999999046325684))
		tmp = single(1.0);
	else
		tmp = single(1.0) + (single(-2.0) * (single(1.0) - u));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;v \leq 0.25999999046325684:\\
\;\;\;\;1\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;1 + -2 \cdot \left(1 - u\right)\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if v < 0.25999999

    1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. add-cube-cbrt99.6%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt[3]{1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)} \cdot \sqrt[3]{1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)}\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)}} \]
      2. pow399.6%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)}\right)}^{3}} \]
      3. +-commutative99.6%

        \[\leadsto {\left(\sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) + 1}}\right)}^{3} \]
      4. +-commutative99.6%

        \[\leadsto {\left(\sqrt[3]{v \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}} + u\right)} + 1}\right)}^{3} \]
      5. fma-udef99.6%

        \[\leadsto {\left(\sqrt[3]{v \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right)} + 1}\right)}^{3} \]
      6. fma-udef99.6%

        \[\leadsto {\left(\sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(v, \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right), 1\right)}}\right)}^{3} \]
    3. Applied egg-rr99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{\mathsf{fma}\left(v, \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right), 1\right)}\right)}^{3}} \]
    4. Taylor expanded in v around 0 93.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1} \]

    if 0.25999999 < v

    1. Initial program 92.5%

      \[1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \]
    2. Taylor expanded in v around inf 56.9%

      \[\leadsto 1 + \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \left(1 - u\right)} \]
    3. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutative56.9%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \color{blue}{\left(1 - u\right) \cdot -2} \]
    4. Simplified56.9%

      \[\leadsto 1 + \color{blue}{\left(1 - u\right) \cdot -2} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification91.4%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;v \leq 0.25999999046325684:\\ \;\;\;\;1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 + -2 \cdot \left(1 - u\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 11: 89.5% accurate, 29.9× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;v \leq 0.25999999046325684:\\ \;\;\;\;1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-1 + u \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u v)
 :precision binary32
 (if (<= v 0.25999999046325684) 1.0 (+ -1.0 (* u 2.0))))
float code(float u, float v) {
	float tmp;
	if (v <= 0.25999999046325684f) {
		tmp = 1.0f;
	} else {
		tmp = -1.0f + (u * 2.0f);
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(4) function code(u, v)
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    real(4), intent (in) :: v
    real(4) :: tmp
    if (v <= 0.25999999046325684e0) then
        tmp = 1.0e0
    else
        tmp = (-1.0e0) + (u * 2.0e0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
function code(u, v)
	tmp = Float32(0.0)
	if (v <= Float32(0.25999999046325684))
		tmp = Float32(1.0);
	else
		tmp = Float32(Float32(-1.0) + Float32(u * Float32(2.0)));
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(u, v)
	tmp = single(0.0);
	if (v <= single(0.25999999046325684))
		tmp = single(1.0);
	else
		tmp = single(-1.0) + (u * single(2.0));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;v \leq 0.25999999046325684:\\
\;\;\;\;1\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;-1 + u \cdot 2\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if v < 0.25999999

    1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. add-cube-cbrt99.6%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt[3]{1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)} \cdot \sqrt[3]{1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)}\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)}} \]
      2. pow399.6%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)}\right)}^{3}} \]
      3. +-commutative99.6%

        \[\leadsto {\left(\sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) + 1}}\right)}^{3} \]
      4. +-commutative99.6%

        \[\leadsto {\left(\sqrt[3]{v \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}} + u\right)} + 1}\right)}^{3} \]
      5. fma-udef99.6%

        \[\leadsto {\left(\sqrt[3]{v \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right)} + 1}\right)}^{3} \]
      6. fma-udef99.6%

        \[\leadsto {\left(\sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(v, \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right), 1\right)}}\right)}^{3} \]
    3. Applied egg-rr99.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{\mathsf{fma}\left(v, \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right), 1\right)}\right)}^{3}} \]
    4. Taylor expanded in v around 0 93.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1} \]

    if 0.25999999 < v

    1. Initial program 92.5%

      \[1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \]
    2. Taylor expanded in v around inf 56.9%

      \[\leadsto 1 + \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \left(1 - u\right)} \]
    3. Step-by-step derivation
      1. *-commutative56.9%

        \[\leadsto 1 + \color{blue}{\left(1 - u\right) \cdot -2} \]
    4. Simplified56.9%

      \[\leadsto 1 + \color{blue}{\left(1 - u\right) \cdot -2} \]
    5. Taylor expanded in u around 0 56.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot u - 1} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification91.4%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;v \leq 0.25999999046325684:\\ \;\;\;\;1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;-1 + u \cdot 2\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 12: 6.1% accurate, 213.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -1 \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u v) :precision binary32 -1.0)
float code(float u, float v) {
	return -1.0f;
}
real(4) function code(u, v)
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    real(4), intent (in) :: v
    code = -1.0e0
end function
function code(u, v)
	return Float32(-1.0)
end
function tmp = code(u, v)
	tmp = single(-1.0);
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
-1
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.5%

    \[1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \]
  2. Taylor expanded in u around 0 6.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1} \]
  3. Final simplification6.0%

    \[\leadsto -1 \]

Alternative 13: 86.2% accurate, 213.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 1 \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u v) :precision binary32 1.0)
float code(float u, float v) {
	return 1.0f;
}
real(4) function code(u, v)
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    real(4), intent (in) :: v
    code = 1.0e0
end function
function code(u, v)
	return Float32(1.0)
end
function tmp = code(u, v)
	tmp = single(1.0);
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
1
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.5%

    \[1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. add-cube-cbrt99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt[3]{1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)} \cdot \sqrt[3]{1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)}\right) \cdot \sqrt[3]{1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)}} \]
    2. pow399.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)}\right)}^{3}} \]
    3. +-commutative99.1%

      \[\leadsto {\left(\sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) + 1}}\right)}^{3} \]
    4. +-commutative99.1%

      \[\leadsto {\left(\sqrt[3]{v \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}} + u\right)} + 1}\right)}^{3} \]
    5. fma-udef99.2%

      \[\leadsto {\left(\sqrt[3]{v \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right)} + 1}\right)}^{3} \]
    6. fma-udef99.2%

      \[\leadsto {\left(\sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(v, \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right), 1\right)}}\right)}^{3} \]
  3. Applied egg-rr99.2%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{{\left(\sqrt[3]{\mathsf{fma}\left(v, \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right), 1\right)}\right)}^{3}} \]
  4. Taylor expanded in v around 0 88.1%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1} \]
  5. Final simplification88.1%

    \[\leadsto 1 \]

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2023279 
(FPCore (u v)
  :name "HairBSDF, sample_f, cosTheta"
  :precision binary32
  :pre (and (and (<= 1e-5 u) (<= u 1.0)) (and (<= 0.0 v) (<= v 109.746574)))
  (+ 1.0 (* v (log (+ u (* (- 1.0 u) (exp (/ -2.0 v))))))))