HairBSDF, sample_f, cosTheta

Percentage Accurate: 99.5% → 99.5%
Time: 24.2s
Alternatives: 7
Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

?
\[\left(10^{-5} \leq u \land u \leq 1\right) \land \left(0 \leq v \land v \leq 109.746574\right)\]
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u v)
 :precision binary32
 (+ 1.0 (* v (log (+ u (* (- 1.0 u) (exp (/ -2.0 v))))))))
float code(float u, float v) {
	return 1.0f + (v * logf((u + ((1.0f - u) * expf((-2.0f / v))))));
}
real(4) function code(u, v)
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    real(4), intent (in) :: v
    code = 1.0e0 + (v * log((u + ((1.0e0 - u) * exp(((-2.0e0) / v))))))
end function
function code(u, v)
	return Float32(Float32(1.0) + Float32(v * log(Float32(u + Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u) * exp(Float32(Float32(-2.0) / v)))))))
end
function tmp = code(u, v)
	tmp = single(1.0) + (v * log((u + ((single(1.0) - u) * exp((single(-2.0) / v))))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary32 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 7 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 99.5% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u v)
 :precision binary32
 (+ 1.0 (* v (log (+ u (* (- 1.0 u) (exp (/ -2.0 v))))))))
float code(float u, float v) {
	return 1.0f + (v * logf((u + ((1.0f - u) * expf((-2.0f / v))))));
}
real(4) function code(u, v)
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    real(4), intent (in) :: v
    code = 1.0e0 + (v * log((u + ((1.0e0 - u) * exp(((-2.0e0) / v))))))
end function
function code(u, v)
	return Float32(Float32(1.0) + Float32(v * log(Float32(u + Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u) * exp(Float32(Float32(-2.0) / v)))))))
end
function tmp = code(u, v)
	tmp = single(1.0) + (v * log((u + ((single(1.0) - u) * exp((single(-2.0) / v))))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 99.5% accurate, 0.5× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(v, \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right), 1\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u v)
 :precision binary32
 (fma v (log (fma (- 1.0 u) (exp (/ -2.0 v)) u)) 1.0))
float code(float u, float v) {
	return fmaf(v, logf(fmaf((1.0f - u), expf((-2.0f / v)), u)), 1.0f);
}
function code(u, v)
	return fma(v, log(fma(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u), exp(Float32(Float32(-2.0) / v)), u)), Float32(1.0))
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\mathsf{fma}\left(v, \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right), 1\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.5%

    \[1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) + 1} \]
    2. fma-def99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(v, \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right), 1\right)} \]
    3. +-commutative99.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(v, \log \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}} + u\right)}, 1\right) \]
    4. fma-def99.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(v, \log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right)}, 1\right) \]
  3. Simplified99.5%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(v, \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right), 1\right)} \]
  4. Final simplification99.5%

    \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(v, \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right), 1\right) \]

Alternative 2: 99.5% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u v)
 :precision binary32
 (+ 1.0 (* v (log (+ u (* (- 1.0 u) (exp (/ -2.0 v))))))))
float code(float u, float v) {
	return 1.0f + (v * logf((u + ((1.0f - u) * expf((-2.0f / v))))));
}
real(4) function code(u, v)
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    real(4), intent (in) :: v
    code = 1.0e0 + (v * log((u + ((1.0e0 - u) * exp(((-2.0e0) / v))))))
end function
function code(u, v)
	return Float32(Float32(1.0) + Float32(v * log(Float32(u + Float32(Float32(Float32(1.0) - u) * exp(Float32(Float32(-2.0) / v)))))))
end
function tmp = code(u, v)
	tmp = single(1.0) + (v * log((u + ((single(1.0) - u) * exp((single(-2.0) / v))))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.5%

    \[1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \]
  2. Final simplification99.5%

    \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \]

Alternative 3: 90.8% accurate, 1.7× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;v \leq 0.11999999731779099:\\ \;\;\;\;1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;u \cdot \left(2 + \left(\left(\frac{0.6666666666666666}{{v}^{3}} + \frac{1.3333333333333333}{v \cdot v}\right) + \frac{2}{v}\right)\right) + -1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u v)
 :precision binary32
 (if (<= v 0.11999999731779099)
   1.0
   (+
    (*
     u
     (+
      2.0
      (+
       (+ (/ 0.6666666666666666 (pow v 3.0)) (/ 1.3333333333333333 (* v v)))
       (/ 2.0 v))))
    -1.0)))
float code(float u, float v) {
	float tmp;
	if (v <= 0.11999999731779099f) {
		tmp = 1.0f;
	} else {
		tmp = (u * (2.0f + (((0.6666666666666666f / powf(v, 3.0f)) + (1.3333333333333333f / (v * v))) + (2.0f / v)))) + -1.0f;
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(4) function code(u, v)
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    real(4), intent (in) :: v
    real(4) :: tmp
    if (v <= 0.11999999731779099e0) then
        tmp = 1.0e0
    else
        tmp = (u * (2.0e0 + (((0.6666666666666666e0 / (v ** 3.0e0)) + (1.3333333333333333e0 / (v * v))) + (2.0e0 / v)))) + (-1.0e0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
function code(u, v)
	tmp = Float32(0.0)
	if (v <= Float32(0.11999999731779099))
		tmp = Float32(1.0);
	else
		tmp = Float32(Float32(u * Float32(Float32(2.0) + Float32(Float32(Float32(Float32(0.6666666666666666) / (v ^ Float32(3.0))) + Float32(Float32(1.3333333333333333) / Float32(v * v))) + Float32(Float32(2.0) / v)))) + Float32(-1.0));
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(u, v)
	tmp = single(0.0);
	if (v <= single(0.11999999731779099))
		tmp = single(1.0);
	else
		tmp = (u * (single(2.0) + (((single(0.6666666666666666) / (v ^ single(3.0))) + (single(1.3333333333333333) / (v * v))) + (single(2.0) / v)))) + single(-1.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;v \leq 0.11999999731779099:\\
\;\;\;\;1\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;u \cdot \left(2 + \left(\left(\frac{0.6666666666666666}{{v}^{3}} + \frac{1.3333333333333333}{v \cdot v}\right) + \frac{2}{v}\right)\right) + -1\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if v < 0.119999997

    1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative100.0%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) + 1} \]
      2. fma-def100.0%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(v, \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right), 1\right)} \]
      3. +-commutative100.0%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(v, \log \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}} + u\right)}, 1\right) \]
      4. fma-def100.0%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(v, \log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right)}, 1\right) \]
    3. Simplified100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(v, \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right), 1\right)} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. fma-udef100.0%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{v \cdot \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right) + 1} \]
      2. fma-udef100.0%

        \[\leadsto v \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}} + u\right)} + 1 \]
      3. +-commutative100.0%

        \[\leadsto v \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)} + 1 \]
      4. add-log-exp99.9%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(e^{v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)}\right)} + 1 \]
      5. *-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto \log \left(e^{\color{blue}{\log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \cdot v}}\right) + 1 \]
      6. exp-to-pow99.9%

        \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left({\left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)}^{v}\right)} + 1 \]
      7. +-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto \log \left({\color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}} + u\right)}}^{v}\right) + 1 \]
      8. fma-udef99.9%

        \[\leadsto \log \left({\color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right)}}^{v}\right) + 1 \]
    5. Applied egg-rr99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right)}^{v}\right) + 1} \]
    6. Taylor expanded in v around 0 93.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1} \]

    if 0.119999997 < v

    1. Initial program 92.3%

      \[1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \]
    2. Taylor expanded in u around 0 65.3%

      \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-2}{v}}} - 1\right) - 2 \cdot \frac{1}{v}\right)} \]
    3. Step-by-step derivation
      1. expm1-log1p-u65.3%

        \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-2}{v}}} - 1\right)\right)\right)} - 2 \cdot \frac{1}{v}\right) \]
      2. expm1-udef63.1%

        \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-2}{v}}} - 1\right)\right)} - 1\right)} - 2 \cdot \frac{1}{v}\right) \]
      3. rec-exp63.1%

        \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \left(\left(e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(u \cdot \left(\color{blue}{e^{-\frac{-2}{v}}} - 1\right)\right)} - 1\right) - 2 \cdot \frac{1}{v}\right) \]
      4. expm1-def63.1%

        \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \left(\left(e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(u \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(-\frac{-2}{v}\right)}\right)} - 1\right) - 2 \cdot \frac{1}{v}\right) \]
    4. Applied egg-rr63.1%

      \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(u \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(-\frac{-2}{v}\right)\right)} - 1\right)} - 2 \cdot \frac{1}{v}\right) \]
    5. Step-by-step derivation
      1. expm1-def65.3%

        \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(u \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(-\frac{-2}{v}\right)\right)\right)} - 2 \cdot \frac{1}{v}\right) \]
      2. expm1-log1p65.3%

        \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \left(\color{blue}{u \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(-\frac{-2}{v}\right)} - 2 \cdot \frac{1}{v}\right) \]
      3. distribute-neg-frac65.3%

        \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \left(u \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\frac{--2}{v}}\right) - 2 \cdot \frac{1}{v}\right) \]
      4. metadata-eval65.3%

        \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \left(u \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\frac{\color{blue}{2}}{v}\right) - 2 \cdot \frac{1}{v}\right) \]
    6. Simplified65.3%

      \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \left(\color{blue}{u \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\frac{2}{v}\right)} - 2 \cdot \frac{1}{v}\right) \]
    7. Taylor expanded in v around 0 65.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{u \cdot \left(v \cdot \left(e^{\frac{2}{v}} - 1\right)\right) - 1} \]
    8. Taylor expanded in v around inf 68.3%

      \[\leadsto u \cdot \color{blue}{\left(2 + \left(0.6666666666666666 \cdot \frac{1}{{v}^{3}} + \left(1.3333333333333333 \cdot \frac{1}{{v}^{2}} + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{v}\right)\right)\right)} - 1 \]
    9. Step-by-step derivation
      1. associate-+r+68.3%

        \[\leadsto u \cdot \left(2 + \color{blue}{\left(\left(0.6666666666666666 \cdot \frac{1}{{v}^{3}} + 1.3333333333333333 \cdot \frac{1}{{v}^{2}}\right) + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{v}\right)}\right) - 1 \]
      2. associate-*r/68.3%

        \[\leadsto u \cdot \left(2 + \left(\left(\color{blue}{\frac{0.6666666666666666 \cdot 1}{{v}^{3}}} + 1.3333333333333333 \cdot \frac{1}{{v}^{2}}\right) + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{v}\right)\right) - 1 \]
      3. metadata-eval68.3%

        \[\leadsto u \cdot \left(2 + \left(\left(\frac{\color{blue}{0.6666666666666666}}{{v}^{3}} + 1.3333333333333333 \cdot \frac{1}{{v}^{2}}\right) + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{v}\right)\right) - 1 \]
      4. associate-*r/68.3%

        \[\leadsto u \cdot \left(2 + \left(\left(\frac{0.6666666666666666}{{v}^{3}} + \color{blue}{\frac{1.3333333333333333 \cdot 1}{{v}^{2}}}\right) + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{v}\right)\right) - 1 \]
      5. metadata-eval68.3%

        \[\leadsto u \cdot \left(2 + \left(\left(\frac{0.6666666666666666}{{v}^{3}} + \frac{\color{blue}{1.3333333333333333}}{{v}^{2}}\right) + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{v}\right)\right) - 1 \]
      6. unpow268.3%

        \[\leadsto u \cdot \left(2 + \left(\left(\frac{0.6666666666666666}{{v}^{3}} + \frac{1.3333333333333333}{\color{blue}{v \cdot v}}\right) + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{v}\right)\right) - 1 \]
      7. associate-*r/68.3%

        \[\leadsto u \cdot \left(2 + \left(\left(\frac{0.6666666666666666}{{v}^{3}} + \frac{1.3333333333333333}{v \cdot v}\right) + \color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{v}}\right)\right) - 1 \]
      8. metadata-eval68.3%

        \[\leadsto u \cdot \left(2 + \left(\left(\frac{0.6666666666666666}{{v}^{3}} + \frac{1.3333333333333333}{v \cdot v}\right) + \frac{\color{blue}{2}}{v}\right)\right) - 1 \]
    10. Simplified68.3%

      \[\leadsto u \cdot \color{blue}{\left(2 + \left(\left(\frac{0.6666666666666666}{{v}^{3}} + \frac{1.3333333333333333}{v \cdot v}\right) + \frac{2}{v}\right)\right)} - 1 \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification92.2%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;v \leq 0.11999999731779099:\\ \;\;\;\;1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;u \cdot \left(2 + \left(\left(\frac{0.6666666666666666}{{v}^{3}} + \frac{1.3333333333333333}{v \cdot v}\right) + \frac{2}{v}\right)\right) + -1\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 90.9% accurate, 1.9× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;v \leq 0.15000000596046448:\\ \;\;\;\;1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;u \cdot \left(v \cdot \left(e^{\frac{2}{v}} + -1\right)\right) + -1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u v)
 :precision binary32
 (if (<= v 0.15000000596046448)
   1.0
   (+ (* u (* v (+ (exp (/ 2.0 v)) -1.0))) -1.0)))
float code(float u, float v) {
	float tmp;
	if (v <= 0.15000000596046448f) {
		tmp = 1.0f;
	} else {
		tmp = (u * (v * (expf((2.0f / v)) + -1.0f))) + -1.0f;
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(4) function code(u, v)
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    real(4), intent (in) :: v
    real(4) :: tmp
    if (v <= 0.15000000596046448e0) then
        tmp = 1.0e0
    else
        tmp = (u * (v * (exp((2.0e0 / v)) + (-1.0e0)))) + (-1.0e0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
function code(u, v)
	tmp = Float32(0.0)
	if (v <= Float32(0.15000000596046448))
		tmp = Float32(1.0);
	else
		tmp = Float32(Float32(u * Float32(v * Float32(exp(Float32(Float32(2.0) / v)) + Float32(-1.0)))) + Float32(-1.0));
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(u, v)
	tmp = single(0.0);
	if (v <= single(0.15000000596046448))
		tmp = single(1.0);
	else
		tmp = (u * (v * (exp((single(2.0) / v)) + single(-1.0)))) + single(-1.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;v \leq 0.15000000596046448:\\
\;\;\;\;1\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;u \cdot \left(v \cdot \left(e^{\frac{2}{v}} + -1\right)\right) + -1\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if v < 0.150000006

    1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) + 1} \]
      2. fma-def100.0%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(v, \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right), 1\right)} \]
      3. +-commutative100.0%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(v, \log \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}} + u\right)}, 1\right) \]
      4. fma-def100.0%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(v, \log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right)}, 1\right) \]
    3. Simplified100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(v, \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right), 1\right)} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. fma-udef99.9%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{v \cdot \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right) + 1} \]
      2. fma-udef99.9%

        \[\leadsto v \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}} + u\right)} + 1 \]
      3. +-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto v \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)} + 1 \]
      4. add-log-exp99.9%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(e^{v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)}\right)} + 1 \]
      5. *-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto \log \left(e^{\color{blue}{\log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \cdot v}}\right) + 1 \]
      6. exp-to-pow99.9%

        \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left({\left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)}^{v}\right)} + 1 \]
      7. +-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto \log \left({\color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}} + u\right)}}^{v}\right) + 1 \]
      8. fma-udef99.9%

        \[\leadsto \log \left({\color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right)}}^{v}\right) + 1 \]
    5. Applied egg-rr99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right)}^{v}\right) + 1} \]
    6. Taylor expanded in v around 0 93.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1} \]

    if 0.150000006 < v

    1. Initial program 92.0%

      \[1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \]
    2. Taylor expanded in u around 0 68.5%

      \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-2}{v}}} - 1\right) - 2 \cdot \frac{1}{v}\right)} \]
    3. Step-by-step derivation
      1. expm1-log1p-u68.5%

        \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-2}{v}}} - 1\right)\right)\right)} - 2 \cdot \frac{1}{v}\right) \]
      2. expm1-udef66.2%

        \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-2}{v}}} - 1\right)\right)} - 1\right)} - 2 \cdot \frac{1}{v}\right) \]
      3. rec-exp66.2%

        \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \left(\left(e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(u \cdot \left(\color{blue}{e^{-\frac{-2}{v}}} - 1\right)\right)} - 1\right) - 2 \cdot \frac{1}{v}\right) \]
      4. expm1-def66.2%

        \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \left(\left(e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(u \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(-\frac{-2}{v}\right)}\right)} - 1\right) - 2 \cdot \frac{1}{v}\right) \]
    4. Applied egg-rr66.2%

      \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(u \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(-\frac{-2}{v}\right)\right)} - 1\right)} - 2 \cdot \frac{1}{v}\right) \]
    5. Step-by-step derivation
      1. expm1-def68.5%

        \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(u \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(-\frac{-2}{v}\right)\right)\right)} - 2 \cdot \frac{1}{v}\right) \]
      2. expm1-log1p68.5%

        \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \left(\color{blue}{u \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(-\frac{-2}{v}\right)} - 2 \cdot \frac{1}{v}\right) \]
      3. distribute-neg-frac68.5%

        \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \left(u \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\frac{--2}{v}}\right) - 2 \cdot \frac{1}{v}\right) \]
      4. metadata-eval68.5%

        \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \left(u \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\frac{\color{blue}{2}}{v}\right) - 2 \cdot \frac{1}{v}\right) \]
    6. Simplified68.5%

      \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \left(\color{blue}{u \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\frac{2}{v}\right)} - 2 \cdot \frac{1}{v}\right) \]
    7. Taylor expanded in v around 0 68.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{u \cdot \left(v \cdot \left(e^{\frac{2}{v}} - 1\right)\right) - 1} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification92.1%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;v \leq 0.15000000596046448:\\ \;\;\;\;1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;u \cdot \left(v \cdot \left(e^{\frac{2}{v}} + -1\right)\right) + -1\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 90.5% accurate, 12.4× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;v \leq 0.4000000059604645:\\ \;\;\;\;1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;u \cdot \left(2 + \left(\frac{1.3333333333333333}{v \cdot v} + \frac{2}{v}\right)\right) + -1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u v)
 :precision binary32
 (if (<= v 0.4000000059604645)
   1.0
   (+ (* u (+ 2.0 (+ (/ 1.3333333333333333 (* v v)) (/ 2.0 v)))) -1.0)))
float code(float u, float v) {
	float tmp;
	if (v <= 0.4000000059604645f) {
		tmp = 1.0f;
	} else {
		tmp = (u * (2.0f + ((1.3333333333333333f / (v * v)) + (2.0f / v)))) + -1.0f;
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(4) function code(u, v)
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    real(4), intent (in) :: v
    real(4) :: tmp
    if (v <= 0.4000000059604645e0) then
        tmp = 1.0e0
    else
        tmp = (u * (2.0e0 + ((1.3333333333333333e0 / (v * v)) + (2.0e0 / v)))) + (-1.0e0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
function code(u, v)
	tmp = Float32(0.0)
	if (v <= Float32(0.4000000059604645))
		tmp = Float32(1.0);
	else
		tmp = Float32(Float32(u * Float32(Float32(2.0) + Float32(Float32(Float32(1.3333333333333333) / Float32(v * v)) + Float32(Float32(2.0) / v)))) + Float32(-1.0));
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp_2 = code(u, v)
	tmp = single(0.0);
	if (v <= single(0.4000000059604645))
		tmp = single(1.0);
	else
		tmp = (u * (single(2.0) + ((single(1.3333333333333333) / (v * v)) + (single(2.0) / v)))) + single(-1.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
\mathbf{if}\;v \leq 0.4000000059604645:\\
\;\;\;\;1\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;u \cdot \left(2 + \left(\frac{1.3333333333333333}{v \cdot v} + \frac{2}{v}\right)\right) + -1\\


\end{array}
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if v < 0.400000006

    1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \]
    2. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) + 1} \]
      2. fma-def99.9%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(v, \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right), 1\right)} \]
      3. +-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(v, \log \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}} + u\right)}, 1\right) \]
      4. fma-def99.9%

        \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(v, \log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right)}, 1\right) \]
    3. Simplified99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(v, \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right), 1\right)} \]
    4. Step-by-step derivation
      1. fma-udef99.9%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{v \cdot \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right) + 1} \]
      2. fma-udef99.9%

        \[\leadsto v \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}} + u\right)} + 1 \]
      3. +-commutative99.9%

        \[\leadsto v \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)} + 1 \]
      4. add-log-exp99.8%

        \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(e^{v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)}\right)} + 1 \]
      5. *-commutative99.8%

        \[\leadsto \log \left(e^{\color{blue}{\log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \cdot v}}\right) + 1 \]
      6. exp-to-pow99.8%

        \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left({\left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)}^{v}\right)} + 1 \]
      7. +-commutative99.8%

        \[\leadsto \log \left({\color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}} + u\right)}}^{v}\right) + 1 \]
      8. fma-udef99.8%

        \[\leadsto \log \left({\color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right)}}^{v}\right) + 1 \]
    5. Applied egg-rr99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right)}^{v}\right) + 1} \]
    6. Taylor expanded in v around 0 92.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1} \]

    if 0.400000006 < v

    1. Initial program 91.5%

      \[1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \]
    2. Taylor expanded in u around 0 79.7%

      \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-2}{v}}} - 1\right) - 2 \cdot \frac{1}{v}\right)} \]
    3. Step-by-step derivation
      1. expm1-log1p-u79.7%

        \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-2}{v}}} - 1\right)\right)\right)} - 2 \cdot \frac{1}{v}\right) \]
      2. expm1-udef76.8%

        \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(u \cdot \left(\frac{1}{e^{\frac{-2}{v}}} - 1\right)\right)} - 1\right)} - 2 \cdot \frac{1}{v}\right) \]
      3. rec-exp76.8%

        \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \left(\left(e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(u \cdot \left(\color{blue}{e^{-\frac{-2}{v}}} - 1\right)\right)} - 1\right) - 2 \cdot \frac{1}{v}\right) \]
      4. expm1-def76.8%

        \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \left(\left(e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(u \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(-\frac{-2}{v}\right)}\right)} - 1\right) - 2 \cdot \frac{1}{v}\right) \]
    4. Applied egg-rr76.8%

      \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\left(e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(u \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(-\frac{-2}{v}\right)\right)} - 1\right)} - 2 \cdot \frac{1}{v}\right) \]
    5. Step-by-step derivation
      1. expm1-def79.7%

        \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(u \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(-\frac{-2}{v}\right)\right)\right)} - 2 \cdot \frac{1}{v}\right) \]
      2. expm1-log1p79.7%

        \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \left(\color{blue}{u \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(-\frac{-2}{v}\right)} - 2 \cdot \frac{1}{v}\right) \]
      3. distribute-neg-frac79.7%

        \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \left(u \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\color{blue}{\frac{--2}{v}}\right) - 2 \cdot \frac{1}{v}\right) \]
      4. metadata-eval79.7%

        \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \left(u \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\frac{\color{blue}{2}}{v}\right) - 2 \cdot \frac{1}{v}\right) \]
    6. Simplified79.7%

      \[\leadsto 1 + v \cdot \left(\color{blue}{u \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(\frac{2}{v}\right)} - 2 \cdot \frac{1}{v}\right) \]
    7. Taylor expanded in v around 0 79.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{u \cdot \left(v \cdot \left(e^{\frac{2}{v}} - 1\right)\right) - 1} \]
    8. Taylor expanded in v around inf 77.1%

      \[\leadsto u \cdot \color{blue}{\left(2 + \left(1.3333333333333333 \cdot \frac{1}{{v}^{2}} + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{v}\right)\right)} - 1 \]
    9. Step-by-step derivation
      1. +-commutative77.1%

        \[\leadsto u \cdot \left(2 + \color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot \frac{1}{v} + 1.3333333333333333 \cdot \frac{1}{{v}^{2}}\right)}\right) - 1 \]
      2. associate-*r/77.1%

        \[\leadsto u \cdot \left(2 + \left(\color{blue}{\frac{2 \cdot 1}{v}} + 1.3333333333333333 \cdot \frac{1}{{v}^{2}}\right)\right) - 1 \]
      3. metadata-eval77.1%

        \[\leadsto u \cdot \left(2 + \left(\frac{\color{blue}{2}}{v} + 1.3333333333333333 \cdot \frac{1}{{v}^{2}}\right)\right) - 1 \]
      4. associate-*r/77.1%

        \[\leadsto u \cdot \left(2 + \left(\frac{2}{v} + \color{blue}{\frac{1.3333333333333333 \cdot 1}{{v}^{2}}}\right)\right) - 1 \]
      5. metadata-eval77.1%

        \[\leadsto u \cdot \left(2 + \left(\frac{2}{v} + \frac{\color{blue}{1.3333333333333333}}{{v}^{2}}\right)\right) - 1 \]
      6. unpow277.1%

        \[\leadsto u \cdot \left(2 + \left(\frac{2}{v} + \frac{1.3333333333333333}{\color{blue}{v \cdot v}}\right)\right) - 1 \]
    10. Simplified77.1%

      \[\leadsto u \cdot \color{blue}{\left(2 + \left(\frac{2}{v} + \frac{1.3333333333333333}{v \cdot v}\right)\right)} - 1 \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification91.9%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;v \leq 0.4000000059604645:\\ \;\;\;\;1\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;u \cdot \left(2 + \left(\frac{1.3333333333333333}{v \cdot v} + \frac{2}{v}\right)\right) + -1\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6: 5.8% accurate, 213.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ -1 \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u v) :precision binary32 -1.0)
float code(float u, float v) {
	return -1.0f;
}
real(4) function code(u, v)
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    real(4), intent (in) :: v
    code = -1.0e0
end function
function code(u, v)
	return Float32(-1.0)
end
function tmp = code(u, v)
	tmp = single(-1.0);
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
-1
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.5%

    \[1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \]
  2. Taylor expanded in u around 0 5.4%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1} \]
  3. Final simplification5.4%

    \[\leadsto -1 \]

Alternative 7: 86.9% accurate, 213.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 1 \end{array} \]
(FPCore (u v) :precision binary32 1.0)
float code(float u, float v) {
	return 1.0f;
}
real(4) function code(u, v)
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    real(4), intent (in) :: v
    code = 1.0e0
end function
function code(u, v)
	return Float32(1.0)
end
function tmp = code(u, v)
	tmp = single(1.0);
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
1
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 99.5%

    \[1 + v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) + 1} \]
    2. fma-def99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(v, \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right), 1\right)} \]
    3. +-commutative99.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(v, \log \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}} + u\right)}, 1\right) \]
    4. fma-def99.5%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(v, \log \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right)}, 1\right) \]
  3. Simplified99.5%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(v, \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right), 1\right)} \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. fma-udef99.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{v \cdot \log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right) + 1} \]
    2. fma-udef99.5%

      \[\leadsto v \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}} + u\right)} + 1 \]
    3. +-commutative99.5%

      \[\leadsto v \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)} + 1 \]
    4. add-log-exp99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(e^{v \cdot \log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)}\right)} + 1 \]
    5. *-commutative99.4%

      \[\leadsto \log \left(e^{\color{blue}{\log \left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right) \cdot v}}\right) + 1 \]
    6. exp-to-pow99.4%

      \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left({\left(u + \left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}}\right)}^{v}\right)} + 1 \]
    7. +-commutative99.4%

      \[\leadsto \log \left({\color{blue}{\left(\left(1 - u\right) \cdot e^{\frac{-2}{v}} + u\right)}}^{v}\right) + 1 \]
    8. fma-udef99.4%

      \[\leadsto \log \left({\color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right)}}^{v}\right) + 1 \]
  5. Applied egg-rr99.4%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left({\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(1 - u, e^{\frac{-2}{v}}, u\right)\right)}^{v}\right) + 1} \]
  6. Taylor expanded in v around 0 88.5%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1} \]
  7. Final simplification88.5%

    \[\leadsto 1 \]

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2023278 
(FPCore (u v)
  :name "HairBSDF, sample_f, cosTheta"
  :precision binary32
  :pre (and (and (<= 1e-5 u) (<= u 1.0)) (and (<= 0.0 v) (<= v 109.746574)))
  (+ 1.0 (* v (log (+ u (* (- 1.0 u) (exp (/ -2.0 v))))))))