Numeric.SpecFunctions:logGamma from math-functions-0.1.5.2, C

Percentage Accurate: 59.3% → 59.3%
Time: 24.7s
Alternatives: 5
Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

?
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{\left(x - 2\right) \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 4.16438922228 + 78.6994924154\right) \cdot x + 137.519416416\right) \cdot x + y\right) \cdot x + z\right)}{\left(\left(\left(x + 43.3400022514\right) \cdot x + 263.505074721\right) \cdot x + 313.399215894\right) \cdot x + 47.066876606} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (/
  (*
   (- x 2.0)
   (+
    (*
     (+ (* (+ (* (+ (* x 4.16438922228) 78.6994924154) x) 137.519416416) x) y)
     x)
    z))
  (+
   (* (+ (* (+ (* (+ x 43.3400022514) x) 263.505074721) x) 313.399215894) x)
   47.066876606)))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x - 2.0) * ((((((((x * 4.16438922228) + 78.6994924154) * x) + 137.519416416) * x) + y) * x) + z)) / (((((((x + 43.3400022514) * x) + 263.505074721) * x) + 313.399215894) * x) + 47.066876606);
}

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((x - 2.0d0) * ((((((((x * 4.16438922228d0) + 78.6994924154d0) * x) + 137.519416416d0) * x) + y) * x) + z)) / (((((((x + 43.3400022514d0) * x) + 263.505074721d0) * x) + 313.399215894d0) * x) + 47.066876606d0)
end function

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x - 2.0) * ((((((((x * 4.16438922228) + 78.6994924154) * x) + 137.519416416) * x) + y) * x) + z)) / (((((((x + 43.3400022514) * x) + 263.505074721) * x) + 313.399215894) * x) + 47.066876606);
}

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((x - 2.0) * ((((((((x * 4.16438922228) + 78.6994924154) * x) + 137.519416416) * x) + y) * x) + z)) / (((((((x + 43.3400022514) * x) + 263.505074721) * x) + 313.399215894) * x) + 47.066876606)

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x - 2.0) * Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * 4.16438922228) + 78.6994924154) * x) + 137.519416416) * x) + y) * x) + z)) / Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x + 43.3400022514) * x) + 263.505074721) * x) + 313.399215894) * x) + 47.066876606))
end

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((x - 2.0) * ((((((((x * 4.16438922228) + 78.6994924154) * x) + 137.519416416) * x) + y) * x) + z)) / (((((((x + 43.3400022514) * x) + 263.505074721) * x) + 313.399215894) * x) + 47.066876606);
end

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(x - 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(x * 4.16438922228), $MachinePrecision] + 78.6994924154), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision] + 137.519416416), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(x + 43.3400022514), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision] + 263.505074721), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision] + 313.399215894), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision] + 47.066876606), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

\begin{array}{l}

\\
\frac{\left(x - 2\right) \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 4.16438922228 + 78.6994924154\right) \cdot x + 137.519416416\right) \cdot x + y\right) \cdot x + z\right)}{\left(\left(\left(x + 43.3400022514\right) \cdot x + 263.505074721\right) \cdot x + 313.399215894\right) \cdot x + 47.066876606}
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary64 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 5 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 59.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{\left(x - 2\right) \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 4.16438922228 + 78.6994924154\right) \cdot x + 137.519416416\right) \cdot x + y\right) \cdot x + z\right)}{\left(\left(\left(x + 43.3400022514\right) \cdot x + 263.505074721\right) \cdot x + 313.399215894\right) \cdot x + 47.066876606} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (/
  (*
   (- x 2.0)
   (+
    (*
     (+ (* (+ (* (+ (* x 4.16438922228) 78.6994924154) x) 137.519416416) x) y)
     x)
    z))
  (+
   (* (+ (* (+ (* (+ x 43.3400022514) x) 263.505074721) x) 313.399215894) x)
   47.066876606)))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x - 2.0) * ((((((((x * 4.16438922228) + 78.6994924154) * x) + 137.519416416) * x) + y) * x) + z)) / (((((((x + 43.3400022514) * x) + 263.505074721) * x) + 313.399215894) * x) + 47.066876606);
}

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((x - 2.0d0) * ((((((((x * 4.16438922228d0) + 78.6994924154d0) * x) + 137.519416416d0) * x) + y) * x) + z)) / (((((((x + 43.3400022514d0) * x) + 263.505074721d0) * x) + 313.399215894d0) * x) + 47.066876606d0)
end function

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x - 2.0) * ((((((((x * 4.16438922228) + 78.6994924154) * x) + 137.519416416) * x) + y) * x) + z)) / (((((((x + 43.3400022514) * x) + 263.505074721) * x) + 313.399215894) * x) + 47.066876606);
}

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((x - 2.0) * ((((((((x * 4.16438922228) + 78.6994924154) * x) + 137.519416416) * x) + y) * x) + z)) / (((((((x + 43.3400022514) * x) + 263.505074721) * x) + 313.399215894) * x) + 47.066876606)

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x - 2.0) * Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * 4.16438922228) + 78.6994924154) * x) + 137.519416416) * x) + y) * x) + z)) / Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x + 43.3400022514) * x) + 263.505074721) * x) + 313.399215894) * x) + 47.066876606))
end

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((x - 2.0) * ((((((((x * 4.16438922228) + 78.6994924154) * x) + 137.519416416) * x) + y) * x) + z)) / (((((((x + 43.3400022514) * x) + 263.505074721) * x) + 313.399215894) * x) + 47.066876606);
end

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(x - 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(x * 4.16438922228), $MachinePrecision] + 78.6994924154), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision] + 137.519416416), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(x + 43.3400022514), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision] + 263.505074721), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision] + 313.399215894), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision] + 47.066876606), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

\begin{array}{l}

\\
\frac{\left(x - 2\right) \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 4.16438922228 + 78.6994924154\right) \cdot x + 137.519416416\right) \cdot x + y\right) \cdot x + z\right)}{\left(\left(\left(x + 43.3400022514\right) \cdot x + 263.505074721\right) \cdot x + 313.399215894\right) \cdot x + 47.066876606}
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 59.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{\left(x - 2\right) \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 4.16438922228 + 78.6994924154\right) \cdot x + 137.519416416\right) \cdot x + y\right) \cdot x + z\right)}{\left(\left(\left(x + 43.3400022514\right) \cdot x + 263.505074721\right) \cdot x + 313.399215894\right) \cdot x + 47.066876606} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (/
  (*
   (- x 2.0)
   (+
    (*
     (+ (* (+ (* (+ (* x 4.16438922228) 78.6994924154) x) 137.519416416) x) y)
     x)
    z))
  (+
   (* (+ (* (+ (* (+ x 43.3400022514) x) 263.505074721) x) 313.399215894) x)
   47.066876606)))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x - 2.0) * ((((((((x * 4.16438922228) + 78.6994924154) * x) + 137.519416416) * x) + y) * x) + z)) / (((((((x + 43.3400022514) * x) + 263.505074721) * x) + 313.399215894) * x) + 47.066876606);
}

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((x - 2.0d0) * ((((((((x * 4.16438922228d0) + 78.6994924154d0) * x) + 137.519416416d0) * x) + y) * x) + z)) / (((((((x + 43.3400022514d0) * x) + 263.505074721d0) * x) + 313.399215894d0) * x) + 47.066876606d0)
end function

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x - 2.0) * ((((((((x * 4.16438922228) + 78.6994924154) * x) + 137.519416416) * x) + y) * x) + z)) / (((((((x + 43.3400022514) * x) + 263.505074721) * x) + 313.399215894) * x) + 47.066876606);
}

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((x - 2.0) * ((((((((x * 4.16438922228) + 78.6994924154) * x) + 137.519416416) * x) + y) * x) + z)) / (((((((x + 43.3400022514) * x) + 263.505074721) * x) + 313.399215894) * x) + 47.066876606)

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x - 2.0) * Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * 4.16438922228) + 78.6994924154) * x) + 137.519416416) * x) + y) * x) + z)) / Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x + 43.3400022514) * x) + 263.505074721) * x) + 313.399215894) * x) + 47.066876606))
end

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((x - 2.0) * ((((((((x * 4.16438922228) + 78.6994924154) * x) + 137.519416416) * x) + y) * x) + z)) / (((((((x + 43.3400022514) * x) + 263.505074721) * x) + 313.399215894) * x) + 47.066876606);
end

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(x - 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(x * 4.16438922228), $MachinePrecision] + 78.6994924154), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision] + 137.519416416), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(x + 43.3400022514), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision] + 263.505074721), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision] + 313.399215894), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision] + 47.066876606), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

\begin{array}{l}

\\
\frac{\left(x - 2\right) \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 4.16438922228 + 78.6994924154\right) \cdot x + 137.519416416\right) \cdot x + y\right) \cdot x + z\right)}{\left(\left(\left(x + 43.3400022514\right) \cdot x + 263.505074721\right) \cdot x + 313.399215894\right) \cdot x + 47.066876606}
\end{array}
Derivation

  1. Initial program 58.9%

    \[\frac{\left(x - 2\right) \cdot \left(\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 4.16438922228 + 78.6994924154\right) \cdot x + 137.519416416\right) \cdot x + y\right) \cdot x + z\right)}{\left(\left(\left(x + 43.3400022514\right) \cdot x + 263.505074721\right) \cdot x + 313.399215894\right) \cdot x + 47.066876606} \]

Alternative 2: 62.2% accurate, 0.1× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{x + -2}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x + 43.3400022514, x, 263.505074721\right), x, 313.399215894\right), x, 47.066876606\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 4.16438922228, 78.6994924154\right), x, 137.519416416\right), x, y\right), x, z\right)}} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (/
  (+ x -2.0)
  (/
   (fma
    (fma (fma (+ x 43.3400022514) x 263.505074721) x 313.399215894)
    x
    47.066876606)
   (fma
    (fma (fma (fma x 4.16438922228 78.6994924154) x 137.519416416) x y)
    x
    z))))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + -2.0) / (fma(fma(fma((x + 43.3400022514), x, 263.505074721), x, 313.399215894), x, 47.066876606) / fma(fma(fma(fma(x, 4.16438922228, 78.6994924154), x, 137.519416416), x, y), x, z));
}

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x + -2.0) / Float64(fma(fma(fma(Float64(x + 43.3400022514), x, 263.505074721), x, 313.399215894), x, 47.066876606) / fma(fma(fma(fma(x, 4.16438922228, 78.6994924154), x, 137.519416416), x, y), x, z)))
end

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x + -2.0), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(x + 43.3400022514), $MachinePrecision] * x + 263.505074721), $MachinePrecision] * x + 313.399215894), $MachinePrecision] * x + 47.066876606), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[(N[(x * 4.16438922228 + 78.6994924154), $MachinePrecision] * x + 137.519416416), $MachinePrecision] * x + y), $MachinePrecision] * x + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

\begin{array}{l}

\\
\frac{x + -2}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x + 43.3400022514, x, 263.505074721\right), x, 313.399215894\right), x, 47.066876606\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 4.16438922228, 78.6994924154\right), x, 137.519416416\right), x, y\right), x, z\right)}}
\end{array}
Derivation

  1. Initial program 61.4%

    \[\frac{x + -2}{\frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x + 43.3400022514, x, 263.505074721\right), x, 313.399215894\right), x, 47.066876606\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 4.16438922228, 78.6994924154\right), x, 137.519416416\right), x, y\right), x, z\right)}} \]

Alternative 3: 62.1% accurate, 0.1× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{x + -2}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x + 43.3400022514, 263.505074721\right), 313.399215894\right), 47.066876606\right)} \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 4.16438922228, 78.6994924154\right), 137.519416416\right), y\right), z\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  (/
   (+ x -2.0)
   (fma
    x
    (fma x (fma x (+ x 43.3400022514) 263.505074721) 313.399215894)
    47.066876606))
  (fma
   x
   (fma x (fma x (fma x 4.16438922228 78.6994924154) 137.519416416) y)
   z)))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((x + -2.0) / fma(x, fma(x, fma(x, (x + 43.3400022514), 263.505074721), 313.399215894), 47.066876606)) * fma(x, fma(x, fma(x, fma(x, 4.16438922228, 78.6994924154), 137.519416416), y), z);
}

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x + -2.0) / fma(x, fma(x, fma(x, Float64(x + 43.3400022514), 263.505074721), 313.399215894), 47.066876606)) * fma(x, fma(x, fma(x, fma(x, 4.16438922228, 78.6994924154), 137.519416416), y), z))
end

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(x + -2.0), $MachinePrecision] / N[(x * N[(x * N[(x * N[(x + 43.3400022514), $MachinePrecision] + 263.505074721), $MachinePrecision] + 313.399215894), $MachinePrecision] + 47.066876606), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(x * N[(x * N[(x * N[(x * 4.16438922228 + 78.6994924154), $MachinePrecision] + 137.519416416), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

\begin{array}{l}

\\
\frac{x + -2}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x + 43.3400022514, 263.505074721\right), 313.399215894\right), 47.066876606\right)} \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 4.16438922228, 78.6994924154\right), 137.519416416\right), y\right), z\right)
\end{array}
Derivation

  1. Initial program 61.4%

    \[\frac{x + -2}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x + 43.3400022514, 263.505074721\right), 313.399215894\right), 47.066876606\right)} \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 4.16438922228, 78.6994924154\right), 137.519416416\right), y\right), z\right) \]

Alternative 4: 62.1% accurate, 0.1× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 4.16438922228, 78.6994924154\right), 137.519416416\right), y\right), z\right) \cdot \frac{x + -2}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x + 43.3400022514, 263.505074721\right), 313.399215894\right), 47.066876606\right)} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  (fma x (fma x (fma x (fma x 4.16438922228 78.6994924154) 137.519416416) y) z)
  (/
   (+ x -2.0)
   (fma
    x
    (fma x (fma x (+ x 43.3400022514) 263.505074721) 313.399215894)
    47.066876606))))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return fma(x, fma(x, fma(x, fma(x, 4.16438922228, 78.6994924154), 137.519416416), y), z) * ((x + -2.0) / fma(x, fma(x, fma(x, (x + 43.3400022514), 263.505074721), 313.399215894), 47.066876606));
}

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(fma(x, fma(x, fma(x, fma(x, 4.16438922228, 78.6994924154), 137.519416416), y), z) * Float64(Float64(x + -2.0) / fma(x, fma(x, fma(x, Float64(x + 43.3400022514), 263.505074721), 313.399215894), 47.066876606)))
end

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x * N[(x * N[(x * N[(x * 4.16438922228 + 78.6994924154), $MachinePrecision] + 137.519416416), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(x + -2.0), $MachinePrecision] / N[(x * N[(x * N[(x * N[(x + 43.3400022514), $MachinePrecision] + 263.505074721), $MachinePrecision] + 313.399215894), $MachinePrecision] + 47.066876606), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

\begin{array}{l}

\\
\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 4.16438922228, 78.6994924154\right), 137.519416416\right), y\right), z\right) \cdot \frac{x + -2}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x + 43.3400022514, 263.505074721\right), 313.399215894\right), 47.066876606\right)}
\end{array}
Derivation

  1. Initial program 61.4%

    \[\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 4.16438922228, 78.6994924154\right), 137.519416416\right), y\right), z\right) \cdot \frac{x + -2}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x + 43.3400022514, 263.505074721\right), 313.399215894\right), 47.066876606\right)} \]

Alternative 5: 62.3% accurate, 0.1× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(x + -2\right) \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 4.16438922228, 78.6994924154\right), 137.519416416\right), y\right), z\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x + 43.3400022514, 263.505074721\right), 313.399215894\right), 47.066876606\right)} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  (+ x -2.0)
  (/
   (fma
    x
    (fma x (fma x (fma x 4.16438922228 78.6994924154) 137.519416416) y)
    z)
   (fma
    x
    (fma x (fma x (+ x 43.3400022514) 263.505074721) 313.399215894)
    47.066876606))))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return (x + -2.0) * (fma(x, fma(x, fma(x, fma(x, 4.16438922228, 78.6994924154), 137.519416416), y), z) / fma(x, fma(x, fma(x, (x + 43.3400022514), 263.505074721), 313.399215894), 47.066876606));
}

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(x + -2.0) * Float64(fma(x, fma(x, fma(x, fma(x, 4.16438922228, 78.6994924154), 137.519416416), y), z) / fma(x, fma(x, fma(x, Float64(x + 43.3400022514), 263.505074721), 313.399215894), 47.066876606)))
end

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(x + -2.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(x * N[(x * N[(x * N[(x * 4.16438922228 + 78.6994924154), $MachinePrecision] + 137.519416416), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision] / N[(x * N[(x * N[(x * N[(x + 43.3400022514), $MachinePrecision] + 263.505074721), $MachinePrecision] + 313.399215894), $MachinePrecision] + 47.066876606), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

\begin{array}{l}

\\
\left(x + -2\right) \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 4.16438922228, 78.6994924154\right), 137.519416416\right), y\right), z\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x + 43.3400022514, 263.505074721\right), 313.399215894\right), 47.066876606\right)}
\end{array}
Derivation

  1. Initial program 61.5%

    \[\left(x + -2\right) \cdot \frac{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 4.16438922228, 78.6994924154\right), 137.519416416\right), y\right), z\right)}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, \mathsf{fma}\left(x, x + 43.3400022514, 263.505074721\right), 313.399215894\right), 47.066876606\right)} \]

Developer target: 98.8% accurate, 0.8× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \left(\frac{y}{x \cdot x} + 4.16438922228 \cdot x\right) - 110.1139242984811\\ \mathbf{if}\;x < -3.326128725870005 \cdot 10^{+62}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x < 9.429991714554673 \cdot 10^{+55}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x - 2}{1} \cdot \frac{\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 4.16438922228 + 78.6994924154\right) \cdot x + 137.519416416\right) \cdot x + y\right) \cdot x + z}{\left(\left(263.505074721 \cdot x + \left(43.3400022514 \cdot \left(x \cdot x\right) + x \cdot \left(x \cdot x\right)\right)\right) + 313.399215894\right) \cdot x + 47.066876606}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]
(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (- (+ (/ y (* x x)) (* 4.16438922228 x)) 110.1139242984811)))
   (if (< x -3.326128725870005e+62)
     t_0
     (if (< x 9.429991714554673e+55)
       (*
        (/ (- x 2.0) 1.0)
        (/
         (+
          (*
           (+
            (* (+ (* (+ (* x 4.16438922228) 78.6994924154) x) 137.519416416) x)
            y)
           x)
          z)
         (+
          (*
           (+
            (+ (* 263.505074721 x) (+ (* 43.3400022514 (* x x)) (* x (* x x))))
            313.399215894)
           x)
          47.066876606)))
       t_0))))
double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = ((y / (x * x)) + (4.16438922228 * x)) - 110.1139242984811;
	double tmp;
	if (x < -3.326128725870005e+62) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (x < 9.429991714554673e+55) {
		tmp = ((x - 2.0) / 1.0) * (((((((((x * 4.16438922228) + 78.6994924154) * x) + 137.519416416) * x) + y) * x) + z) / (((((263.505074721 * x) + ((43.3400022514 * (x * x)) + (x * (x * x)))) + 313.399215894) * x) + 47.066876606));
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = ((y / (x * x)) + (4.16438922228d0 * x)) - 110.1139242984811d0
    if (x < (-3.326128725870005d+62)) then
        tmp = t_0
    else if (x < 9.429991714554673d+55) then
        tmp = ((x - 2.0d0) / 1.0d0) * (((((((((x * 4.16438922228d0) + 78.6994924154d0) * x) + 137.519416416d0) * x) + y) * x) + z) / (((((263.505074721d0 * x) + ((43.3400022514d0 * (x * x)) + (x * (x * x)))) + 313.399215894d0) * x) + 47.066876606d0))
    else
        tmp = t_0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double t_0 = ((y / (x * x)) + (4.16438922228 * x)) - 110.1139242984811;
	double tmp;
	if (x < -3.326128725870005e+62) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (x < 9.429991714554673e+55) {
		tmp = ((x - 2.0) / 1.0) * (((((((((x * 4.16438922228) + 78.6994924154) * x) + 137.519416416) * x) + y) * x) + z) / (((((263.505074721 * x) + ((43.3400022514 * (x * x)) + (x * (x * x)))) + 313.399215894) * x) + 47.066876606));
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

def code(x, y, z):
	t_0 = ((y / (x * x)) + (4.16438922228 * x)) - 110.1139242984811
	tmp = 0
	if x < -3.326128725870005e+62:
		tmp = t_0
	elif x < 9.429991714554673e+55:
		tmp = ((x - 2.0) / 1.0) * (((((((((x * 4.16438922228) + 78.6994924154) * x) + 137.519416416) * x) + y) * x) + z) / (((((263.505074721 * x) + ((43.3400022514 * (x * x)) + (x * (x * x)))) + 313.399215894) * x) + 47.066876606))
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return tmp

function code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(Float64(y / Float64(x * x)) + Float64(4.16438922228 * x)) - 110.1139242984811)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x < -3.326128725870005e+62)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (x < 9.429991714554673e+55)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(x - 2.0) / 1.0) * Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x * 4.16438922228) + 78.6994924154) * x) + 137.519416416) * x) + y) * x) + z) / Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(263.505074721 * x) + Float64(Float64(43.3400022514 * Float64(x * x)) + Float64(x * Float64(x * x)))) + 313.399215894) * x) + 47.066876606)));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	t_0 = ((y / (x * x)) + (4.16438922228 * x)) - 110.1139242984811;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x < -3.326128725870005e+62)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (x < 9.429991714554673e+55)
		tmp = ((x - 2.0) / 1.0) * (((((((((x * 4.16438922228) + 78.6994924154) * x) + 137.519416416) * x) + y) * x) + z) / (((((263.505074721 * x) + ((43.3400022514 * (x * x)) + (x * (x * x)))) + 313.399215894) * x) + 47.066876606));
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

code[x_, y_, z_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(N[(y / N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(4.16438922228 * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - 110.1139242984811), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Less[x, -3.326128725870005e+62], t$95$0, If[Less[x, 9.429991714554673e+55], N[(N[(N[(x - 2.0), $MachinePrecision] / 1.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(x * 4.16438922228), $MachinePrecision] + 78.6994924154), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision] + 137.519416416), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(263.505074721 * x), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(43.3400022514 * N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 313.399215894), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision] + 47.066876606), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]

\begin{array}{l}

\\
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \left(\frac{y}{x \cdot x} + 4.16438922228 \cdot x\right) - 110.1139242984811\\
\mathbf{if}\;x < -3.326128725870005 \cdot 10^{+62}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_0\\

\mathbf{elif}\;x < 9.429991714554673 \cdot 10^{+55}:\\
\;\;\;\;\frac{x - 2}{1} \cdot \frac{\left(\left(\left(x \cdot 4.16438922228 + 78.6994924154\right) \cdot x + 137.519416416\right) \cdot x + y\right) \cdot x + z}{\left(\left(263.505074721 \cdot x + \left(43.3400022514 \cdot \left(x \cdot x\right) + x \cdot \left(x \cdot x\right)\right)\right) + 313.399215894\right) \cdot x + 47.066876606}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;t_0\\


\end{array}
\end{array}

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2023276 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Numeric.SpecFunctions:logGamma from math-functions-0.1.5.2, C"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (if (< x -3.326128725870005e+62) (- (+ (/ y (* x x)) (* 4.16438922228 x)) 110.1139242984811) (if (< x 9.429991714554673e+55) (* (/ (- x 2.0) 1.0) (/ (+ (* (+ (* (+ (* (+ (* x 4.16438922228) 78.6994924154) x) 137.519416416) x) y) x) z) (+ (* (+ (+ (* 263.505074721 x) (+ (* 43.3400022514 (* x x)) (* x (* x x)))) 313.399215894) x) 47.066876606))) (- (+ (/ y (* x x)) (* 4.16438922228 x)) 110.1139242984811)))

  (/ (* (- x 2.0) (+ (* (+ (* (+ (* (+ (* x 4.16438922228) 78.6994924154) x) 137.519416416) x) y) x) z)) (+ (* (+ (* (+ (* (+ x 43.3400022514) x) 263.505074721) x) 313.399215894) x) 47.066876606)))