Diagrams.Solve.Polynomial:quartForm from diagrams-solve-0.1, B

Percentage Accurate: 100.0% → 100.0%

Time: 5.9s

Alternatives: 8

Speedup: 1.2×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (- (* (/ 1.0 8.0) x) (/ (* y z) 2.0)) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((1.0 / 8.0) * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0)) + t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (((1.0d0 / 8.0d0) * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0d0)) + t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((1.0 / 8.0) * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0)) + t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((1.0 / 8.0) * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0)) + t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(1.0 / 8.0) * x) - Float64(Float64(y * z) / 2.0)) + t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((1.0 / 8.0) * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0)) + t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(1.0 / 8.0), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 100.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ (- (* (/ 1.0 8.0) x) (/ (* y z) 2.0)) t))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((1.0 / 8.0) * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0)) + t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = (((1.0d0 / 8.0d0) * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0d0)) + t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return (((1.0 / 8.0) * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0)) + t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return (((1.0 / 8.0) * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0)) + t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(1.0 / 8.0) * x) - Float64(Float64(y * z) / 2.0)) + t)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = (((1.0 / 8.0) * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0)) + t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(1.0 / 8.0), $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(0.125, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{y}{-2}, z, t\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (fma 0.125 x (fma (/ y -2.0) z t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return fma(0.125, x, fma((y / -2.0), z, t));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return fma(0.125, x, fma(Float64(y / -2.0), z, t))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(0.125 * x + N[(N[(y / -2.0), $MachinePrecision] * z + t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x + \left(-\frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right)\right)} + t \]

   2. associate-+l+ 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{8} \cdot x + \left(\left(-\frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t\right)} \]

   3. fma-def 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{1}{8}, x, \left(-\frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t\right)} \]

   4. metadata-eval 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{0.125}, x, \left(-\frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t\right) \]

   5. distribute-frac-neg 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(0.125, x, \color{blue}{\frac{-y \cdot z}{2}} + t\right) \]

   6. distribute-lft-neg-out 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(0.125, x, \frac{\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot z}}{2} + t\right) \]

   7. associate-*l/ 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(0.125, x, \color{blue}{\frac{-y}{2} \cdot z} + t\right) \]

   8. fma-def 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(0.125, x, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{-y}{2}, z, t\right)}\right) \]

   9. neg-mul-1 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(0.125, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot y}}{2}, z, t\right)\right) \]

   10. *-commutative 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(0.125, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot -1}}{2}, z, t\right)\right) \]

   11. associate-/l* 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(0.125, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{2}{-1}}}, z, t\right)\right) \]

   12. metadata-eval 100.0%

       \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(0.125, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{-2}}, z, t\right)\right) \]

3. Simplified 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.125, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{y}{-2}, z, t\right)\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(0.125, x, \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{y}{-2}, z, t\right)\right) \]

Alternative 2: 87.9% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \cdot z \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+77} \lor \neg \left(y \cdot z \leq 200000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;t - \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot 0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t + 0.125 \cdot x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= (* y z) -1e+77) (not (<= (* y z) 200000.0)))
   (- t (* (* y z) 0.5))
   (+ t (* 0.125 x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (((y * z) <= -1e+77) || !((y * z) <= 200000.0)) {
		tmp = t - ((y * z) * 0.5);
	} else {
		tmp = t + (0.125 * x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (((y * z) <= (-1d+77)) .or. (.not. ((y * z) <= 200000.0d0))) then
        tmp = t - ((y * z) * 0.5d0)
    else
        tmp = t + (0.125d0 * x)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (((y * z) <= -1e+77) || !((y * z) <= 200000.0)) {
		tmp = t - ((y * z) * 0.5);
	} else {
		tmp = t + (0.125 * x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if ((y * z) <= -1e+77) or not ((y * z) <= 200000.0):
		tmp = t - ((y * z) * 0.5)
	else:
		tmp = t + (0.125 * x)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((Float64(y * z) <= -1e+77) || !(Float64(y * z) <= 200000.0))
		tmp = Float64(t - Float64(Float64(y * z) * 0.5));
	else
		tmp = Float64(t + Float64(0.125 * x));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((y * z) <= -1e+77) || ~(((y * z) <= 200000.0)))
		tmp = t - ((y * z) * 0.5);
	else
		tmp = t + (0.125 * x);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], -1e+77], N[Not[LessEqual[N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], 200000.0]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(t - N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(t + N[(0.125 * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (*.f64 y z) < -9.99999999999999983e76 or 2e5 < (*.f64 y z)

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 89.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t - 0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]

   if -9.99999999999999983e76 < (*.f64 y z) < 2e5

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around 0 94.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t + 0.125 \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 91.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \cdot z \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+77} \lor \neg \left(y \cdot z \leq 200000\right):\\ \;\;\;\;t - \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot 0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t + 0.125 \cdot x\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 87.3% accurate, 0.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot 0.5\\ \mathbf{if}\;y \cdot z \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+135}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.125 \cdot x - t_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \cdot z \leq 200000:\\ \;\;\;\;t + 0.125 \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t - t_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* (* y z) 0.5)))
   (if (<= (* y z) -1e+135)
     (- (* 0.125 x) t_1)
     (if (<= (* y z) 200000.0) (+ t (* 0.125 x)) (- t t_1)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = (y * z) * 0.5;
	double tmp;
	if ((y * z) <= -1e+135) {
		tmp = (0.125 * x) - t_1;
	} else if ((y * z) <= 200000.0) {
		tmp = t + (0.125 * x);
	} else {
		tmp = t - t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = (y * z) * 0.5d0
    if ((y * z) <= (-1d+135)) then
        tmp = (0.125d0 * x) - t_1
    else if ((y * z) <= 200000.0d0) then
        tmp = t + (0.125d0 * x)
    else
        tmp = t - t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = (y * z) * 0.5;
	double tmp;
	if ((y * z) <= -1e+135) {
		tmp = (0.125 * x) - t_1;
	} else if ((y * z) <= 200000.0) {
		tmp = t + (0.125 * x);
	} else {
		tmp = t - t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	t_1 = (y * z) * 0.5
	tmp = 0
	if (y * z) <= -1e+135:
		tmp = (0.125 * x) - t_1
	elif (y * z) <= 200000.0:
		tmp = t + (0.125 * x)
	else:
		tmp = t - t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(y * z) * 0.5)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(y * z) <= -1e+135)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(0.125 * x) - t_1);
	elseif (Float64(y * z) <= 200000.0)
		tmp = Float64(t + Float64(0.125 * x));
	else
		tmp = Float64(t - t_1);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = (y * z) * 0.5;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y * z) <= -1e+135)
		tmp = (0.125 * x) - t_1;
	elseif ((y * z) <= 200000.0)
		tmp = t + (0.125 * x);
	else
		tmp = t - t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], -1e+135], N[(N[(0.125 * x), $MachinePrecision] - t$95$1), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision], 200000.0], N[(t + N[(0.125 * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(t - t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if (*.f64 y z) < -9.99999999999999962e134

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]

   2. Taylor expanded in t around 0 94.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.125 \cdot x - 0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]

   if -9.99999999999999962e134 < (*.f64 y z) < 2e5

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around 0 92.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t + 0.125 \cdot x} \]

   if 2e5 < (*.f64 y z)

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 91.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t - 0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 92.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \cdot z \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+135}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.125 \cdot x - \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot 0.5\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \cdot z \leq 200000:\\ \;\;\;\;t + 0.125 \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t - \left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot 0.5\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 49.3% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := y \cdot \left(z \cdot -0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2.7 \cdot 10^{+50}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_1\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 9.5 \cdot 10^{-273}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.125 \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 3.5 \cdot 10^{-129}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (* y (* z -0.5))))
   (if (<= y -2.7e+50)
     t_1
     (if (<= y 9.5e-273) (* 0.125 x) (if (<= y 3.5e-129) t t_1)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = y * (z * -0.5);
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -2.7e+50) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (y <= 9.5e-273) {
		tmp = 0.125 * x;
	} else if (y <= 3.5e-129) {
		tmp = t;
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = y * (z * (-0.5d0))
    if (y <= (-2.7d+50)) then
        tmp = t_1
    else if (y <= 9.5d-273) then
        tmp = 0.125d0 * x
    else if (y <= 3.5d-129) then
        tmp = t
    else
        tmp = t_1
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = y * (z * -0.5);
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -2.7e+50) {
		tmp = t_1;
	} else if (y <= 9.5e-273) {
		tmp = 0.125 * x;
	} else if (y <= 3.5e-129) {
		tmp = t;
	} else {
		tmp = t_1;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	t_1 = y * (z * -0.5)
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -2.7e+50:
		tmp = t_1
	elif y <= 9.5e-273:
		tmp = 0.125 * x
	elif y <= 3.5e-129:
		tmp = t
	else:
		tmp = t_1
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(y * Float64(z * -0.5))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -2.7e+50)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (y <= 9.5e-273)
		tmp = Float64(0.125 * x);
	elseif (y <= 3.5e-129)
		tmp = t;
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = y * (z * -0.5);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -2.7e+50)
		tmp = t_1;
	elseif (y <= 9.5e-273)
		tmp = 0.125 * x;
	elseif (y <= 3.5e-129)
		tmp = t;
	else
		tmp = t_1;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[(y * N[(z * -0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[y, -2.7e+50], t$95$1, If[LessEqual[y, 9.5e-273], N[(0.125 * x), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 3.5e-129], t, t$95$1]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < -2.7e50 or 3.4999999999999997e-129 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around inf 57.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 57.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot -0.5} \]

      2. associate-*l* 57.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot -0.5\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 57.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot -0.5\right)} \]

   if -2.7e50 < y < 9.49999999999999925e-273

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 49.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.125 \cdot x} \]

   if 9.49999999999999925e-273 < y < 3.4999999999999997e-129

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]

   2. Taylor expanded in t around inf 43.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 53.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -2.7 \cdot 10^{+50}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(z \cdot -0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 9.5 \cdot 10^{-273}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.125 \cdot x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 3.5 \cdot 10^{-129}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(z \cdot -0.5\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 100.0% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ t + \left(0.125 \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (+ t (- (* 0.125 x) (/ (* y z) 2.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return t + ((0.125 * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = t + ((0.125d0 * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return t + ((0.125 * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return t + ((0.125 * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(t + Float64(Float64(0.125 * x) - Float64(Float64(y * z) / 2.0)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = t + ((0.125 * x) - ((y * z) / 2.0));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(t + N[(N[(0.125 * x), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]

2. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto t + \left(0.125 \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) \]

Alternative 6: 72.7% accurate, 1.4× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -4 \cdot 10^{+31} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+198}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(z \cdot -0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t + 0.125 \cdot x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -4e+31) (not (<= z 4e+198)))
   (* y (* z -0.5))
   (+ t (* 0.125 x))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -4e+31) || !(z <= 4e+198)) {
		tmp = y * (z * -0.5);
	} else {
		tmp = t + (0.125 * x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-4d+31)) .or. (.not. (z <= 4d+198))) then
        tmp = y * (z * (-0.5d0))
    else
        tmp = t + (0.125d0 * x)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -4e+31) || !(z <= 4e+198)) {
		tmp = y * (z * -0.5);
	} else {
		tmp = t + (0.125 * x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -4e+31) or not (z <= 4e+198):
		tmp = y * (z * -0.5)
	else:
		tmp = t + (0.125 * x)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -4e+31) || !(z <= 4e+198))
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(z * -0.5));
	else
		tmp = Float64(t + Float64(0.125 * x));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -4e+31) || ~((z <= 4e+198)))
		tmp = y * (z * -0.5);
	else
		tmp = t + (0.125 * x);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -4e+31], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 4e+198]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(y * N[(z * -0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(t + N[(0.125 * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -3.9999999999999999e31 or 4.00000000000000007e198 < z

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around inf 65.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 65.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot z\right) \cdot -0.5} \]

      2. associate-*l* 65.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot -0.5\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 65.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(z \cdot -0.5\right)} \]

   if -3.9999999999999999e31 < z < 4.00000000000000007e198

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around 0 75.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t + 0.125 \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 71.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -4 \cdot 10^{+31} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+198}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \left(z \cdot -0.5\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t + 0.125 \cdot x\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 7: 48.2% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -1.22 \cdot 10^{-47}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 1.7 \cdot 10^{+129}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.125 \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= t -1.22e-47) t (if (<= t 1.7e+129) (* 0.125 x) t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (t <= -1.22e-47) {
		tmp = t;
	} else if (t <= 1.7e+129) {
		tmp = 0.125 * x;
	} else {
		tmp = t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (t <= (-1.22d-47)) then
        tmp = t
    else if (t <= 1.7d+129) then
        tmp = 0.125d0 * x
    else
        tmp = t
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (t <= -1.22e-47) {
		tmp = t;
	} else if (t <= 1.7e+129) {
		tmp = 0.125 * x;
	} else {
		tmp = t;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if t <= -1.22e-47:
		tmp = t
	elif t <= 1.7e+129:
		tmp = 0.125 * x
	else:
		tmp = t
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t <= -1.22e-47)
		tmp = t;
	elseif (t <= 1.7e+129)
		tmp = Float64(0.125 * x);
	else
		tmp = t;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t <= -1.22e-47)
		tmp = t;
	elseif (t <= 1.7e+129)
		tmp = 0.125 * x;
	else
		tmp = t;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[t, -1.22e-47], t, If[LessEqual[t, 1.7e+129], N[(0.125 * x), $MachinePrecision], t]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if t < -1.2199999999999999e-47 or 1.70000000000000009e129 < t

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]

   2. Taylor expanded in t around inf 56.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t} \]

   if -1.2199999999999999e-47 < t < 1.70000000000000009e129

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 48.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0.125 \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 51.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -1.22 \cdot 10^{-47}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 1.7 \cdot 10^{+129}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.125 \cdot x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 8: 32.2% accurate, 13.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ t \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 t)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return t;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = t
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return t;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return t

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return t
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = t;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := t

Derivation

1. Initial program 100.0%

   \[\left(\frac{1}{8} \cdot x - \frac{y \cdot z}{2}\right) + t \]

2. Taylor expanded in t around inf 30.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{t} \]

3. Final simplification 30.5%

   \[\leadsto t \]

Developer target: 100.0% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\frac{x}{8} + t\right) - \frac{z}{2} \cdot y \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- (+ (/ x 8.0) t) (* (/ z 2.0) y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return ((x / 8.0) + t) - ((z / 2.0) * y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = ((x / 8.0d0) + t) - ((z / 2.0d0) * y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return ((x / 8.0) + t) - ((z / 2.0) * y);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return ((x / 8.0) + t) - ((z / 2.0) * y)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(x / 8.0) + t) - Float64(Float64(z / 2.0) * y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = ((x / 8.0) + t) - ((z / 2.0) * y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(N[(x / 8.0), $MachinePrecision] + t), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(z / 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023275 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "Diagrams.Solve.Polynomial:quartForm  from diagrams-solve-0.1, B"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (- (+ (/ x 8.0) t) (* (/ z 2.0) y))

  (+ (- (* (/ 1.0 8.0) x) (/ (* y z) 2.0)) t))