Numeric.AD.Rank1.Halley:findZero from ad-4.2.4

Percentage Accurate: 82.2% → 98.6%

Time: 9.0s

Alternatives: 7

Speedup: 1.5×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- x (/ (* (* y 2.0) z) (- (* (* z 2.0) z) (* y t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x - (((y * 2.0d0) * z) / (((z * 2.0d0) * z) - (y * t)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(Float64(Float64(y * 2.0) * z) / Float64(Float64(Float64(z * 2.0) * z) - Float64(y * t))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(N[(N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[(z * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 82.2% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- x (/ (* (* y 2.0) z) (- (* (* z 2.0) z) (* y t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x - (((y * 2.0d0) * z) / (((z * 2.0d0) * z) - (y * t)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(Float64(Float64(y * 2.0) * z) / Float64(Float64(Float64(z * 2.0) * z) - Float64(y * t))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x - (((y * 2.0) * z) / (((z * 2.0) * z) - (y * t)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(N[(N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(N[(z * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.6% accurate, 0.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{y}{z \cdot -2 + y \cdot \frac{t}{z}}, 2, x\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (fma (/ y (+ (* z -2.0) (* y (/ t z)))) 2.0 x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return fma((y / ((z * -2.0) + (y * (t / z)))), 2.0, x);
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return fma(Float64(y / Float64(Float64(z * -2.0) + Float64(y * Float64(t / z)))), 2.0, x)
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(N[(y / N[(N[(z * -2.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * N[(t / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * 2.0 + x), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 81.7%

   \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 81.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(-\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}\right)} \]

   2. +-commutative 81.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}\right) + x} \]

   3. distribute-neg-frac 81.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}} + x \]

   4. distribute-rgt-neg-out 81.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)}}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} + x \]

   5. remove-double-neg 81.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)}{\color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z\right)\right)} - y \cdot t} + x \]

   6. distribute-rgt-neg-in 81.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)}{\left(-\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)}\right) - y \cdot t} + x \]

   7. distribute-lft-neg-out 81.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)}{\color{blue}{\left(-z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)} - y \cdot t} + x \]

   8. distribute-lft-neg-out 81.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)}{\color{blue}{\left(\left(-z\right) \cdot 2\right)} \cdot \left(-z\right) - y \cdot t} + x \]

   9. associate-/l* 92.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{\left(\left(-z\right) \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(-z\right) - y \cdot t}{-z}}} + x \]

   10. associate-*l/ 92.6%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{\left(\left(-z\right) \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(-z\right) - y \cdot t}{-z}} \cdot 2} + x \]

   11. fma-def 92.6%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{y}{\frac{\left(\left(-z\right) \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(-z\right) - y \cdot t}{-z}}, 2, x\right)} \]

3. Simplified 99.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{y}{z \cdot -2 + \frac{t}{z} \cdot y}, 2, x\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 99.2%

   \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{y}{z \cdot -2 + y \cdot \frac{t}{z}}, 2, x\right) \]

Alternative 2: 98.5% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \frac{-1}{z \cdot 2 - y \cdot \frac{t}{z}} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (* (* y 2.0) (/ -1.0 (- (* z 2.0) (* y (/ t z)))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * 2.0) * (-1.0 / ((z * 2.0) - (y * (t / z)))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x + ((y * 2.0d0) * ((-1.0d0) / ((z * 2.0d0) - (y * (t / z)))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + ((y * 2.0) * (-1.0 / ((z * 2.0) - (y * (t / z)))));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + ((y * 2.0) * (-1.0 / ((z * 2.0) - (y * (t / z)))))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(y * 2.0) * Float64(-1.0 / Float64(Float64(z * 2.0) - Float64(y * Float64(t / z))))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x + ((y * 2.0) * (-1.0 / ((z * 2.0) - (y * (t / z)))));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(N[(y * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] * N[(-1.0 / N[(N[(z * 2.0), $MachinePrecision] - N[(y * N[(t / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 81.7%

   \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-/l* 92.6%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}} \]

   2. associate-*l* 92.6%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right)} - y \cdot t}{z}} \]

3. Simplified 92.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right) - y \cdot t}{z}}} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. div-inv 92.6%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\frac{z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right) - y \cdot t}{z}}} \]

5. Applied egg-rr 92.6%

   \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\frac{z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right) - y \cdot t}{z}}} \]

6. Taylor expanded in z around 0 96.5%

   \[\leadsto x - \left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{t \cdot y}{z} + 2 \cdot z}} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 96.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\color{blue}{2 \cdot z + -1 \cdot \frac{t \cdot y}{z}}} \]

   2. mul-1-neg 96.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \frac{1}{2 \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{t \cdot y}{z}\right)}} \]

   3. *-commutative 96.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \frac{1}{2 \cdot z + \left(-\frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot t}}{z}\right)} \]

   4. associate-*r/ 99.2%

      \[\leadsto x - \left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \frac{1}{2 \cdot z + \left(-\color{blue}{y \cdot \frac{t}{z}}\right)} \]

   5. unsub-neg 99.2%

      \[\leadsto x - \left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\color{blue}{2 \cdot z - y \cdot \frac{t}{z}}} \]

   6. *-commutative 99.2%

      \[\leadsto x - \left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\color{blue}{z \cdot 2} - y \cdot \frac{t}{z}} \]

8. Simplified 99.2%

   \[\leadsto x - \left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \frac{1}{\color{blue}{z \cdot 2 - y \cdot \frac{t}{z}}} \]

9. Final simplification 99.2%

   \[\leadsto x + \left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \frac{-1}{z \cdot 2 - y \cdot \frac{t}{z}} \]

Alternative 3: 89.3% accurate, 1.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -9 \cdot 10^{-6} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 4.5 \cdot 10^{+29}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \frac{2}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -9e-6) (not (<= z 4.5e+29)))
   (- x (/ y z))
   (+ x (* z (/ 2.0 t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -9e-6) || !(z <= 4.5e+29)) {
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (2.0 / t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-9d-6)) .or. (.not. (z <= 4.5d+29))) then
        tmp = x - (y / z)
    else
        tmp = x + (z * (2.0d0 / t))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -9e-6) || !(z <= 4.5e+29)) {
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (2.0 / t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -9e-6) or not (z <= 4.5e+29):
		tmp = x - (y / z)
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * (2.0 / t))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -9e-6) || !(z <= 4.5e+29))
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(y / z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(2.0 / t)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -9e-6) || ~((z <= 4.5e+29)))
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	else
		tmp = x + (z * (2.0 / t));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -9e-6], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 4.5e+29]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x - N[(y / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(z * N[(2.0 / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -9.00000000000000023e-6 or 4.5000000000000002e29 < z

   1. Initial program 72.7%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 72.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(-\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}\right)} \]

      2. associate-/l* 89.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}}\right) \]

      3. distribute-neg-frac 89.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{-y \cdot 2}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}} \]

      4. distribute-lft-neg-out 89.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot 2}}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}} \]

      5. associate-/r/ 89.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{\left(-y\right) \cdot 2}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \cdot z} \]

      6. distribute-lft-neg-out 89.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{-y \cdot 2}}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \cdot z \]

      7. distribute-rgt-neg-in 89.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-2\right)}}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \cdot z \]

      8. metadata-eval 89.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot \color{blue}{-2}}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \cdot z \]

      9. *-commutative 89.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot -2}{\color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot z\right)} \cdot z - y \cdot t} \cdot z \]

      10. associate-*l* 89.2%

          \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot -2}{\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)} - y \cdot t} \cdot z \]

      11. fma-neg 89.2%

          \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot -2}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, z \cdot z, -y \cdot t\right)}} \cdot z \]

   3. Simplified 89.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{y \cdot -2}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, z \cdot z, -y \cdot t\right)} \cdot z} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 93.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + -1 \cdot \frac{y}{z}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 93.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{y}{z}\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 93.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y}{z}} \]

   6. Simplified 93.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y}{z}} \]

   if -9.00000000000000023e-6 < z < 4.5000000000000002e29

   1. Initial program 91.1%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 91.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(-\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}\right)} \]

      2. associate-/l* 96.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}}\right) \]

      3. distribute-neg-frac 96.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{-y \cdot 2}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}} \]

      4. distribute-lft-neg-out 96.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot 2}}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}} \]

      5. associate-/r/ 96.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{\left(-y\right) \cdot 2}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \cdot z} \]

      6. distribute-lft-neg-out 96.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{-y \cdot 2}}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \cdot z \]

      7. distribute-rgt-neg-in 96.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-2\right)}}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \cdot z \]

      8. metadata-eval 96.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot \color{blue}{-2}}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \cdot z \]

      9. *-commutative 96.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot -2}{\color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot z\right)} \cdot z - y \cdot t} \cdot z \]

      10. associate-*l* 96.3%

          \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot -2}{\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)} - y \cdot t} \cdot z \]

      11. fma-neg 96.3%

          \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot -2}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, z \cdot z, -y \cdot t\right)}} \cdot z \]

   3. Simplified 96.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{y \cdot -2}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, z \cdot z, -y \cdot t\right)} \cdot z} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 93.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{2}{t}} \cdot z \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 93.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -9 \cdot 10^{-6} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 4.5 \cdot 10^{+29}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \frac{2}{t}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 89.4% accurate, 1.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.15 \cdot 10^{-5} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.75 \cdot 10^{+30}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{z \cdot -2}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -1.15e-5) (not (<= z 1.75e+30)))
   (- x (/ y z))
   (- x (/ (* z -2.0) t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.15e-5) || !(z <= 1.75e+30)) {
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	} else {
		tmp = x - ((z * -2.0) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-1.15d-5)) .or. (.not. (z <= 1.75d+30))) then
        tmp = x - (y / z)
    else
        tmp = x - ((z * (-2.0d0)) / t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -1.15e-5) || !(z <= 1.75e+30)) {
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	} else {
		tmp = x - ((z * -2.0) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -1.15e-5) or not (z <= 1.75e+30):
		tmp = x - (y / z)
	else:
		tmp = x - ((z * -2.0) / t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -1.15e-5) || !(z <= 1.75e+30))
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(y / z));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(Float64(z * -2.0) / t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -1.15e-5) || ~((z <= 1.75e+30)))
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	else
		tmp = x - ((z * -2.0) / t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -1.15e-5], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 1.75e+30]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x - N[(y / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x - N[(N[(z * -2.0), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.15e-5 or 1.75000000000000011e30 < z

   1. Initial program 72.7%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 72.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(-\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}\right)} \]

      2. associate-/l* 89.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}}\right) \]

      3. distribute-neg-frac 89.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{-y \cdot 2}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}} \]

      4. distribute-lft-neg-out 89.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot 2}}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}} \]

      5. associate-/r/ 89.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{\left(-y\right) \cdot 2}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \cdot z} \]

      6. distribute-lft-neg-out 89.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{-y \cdot 2}}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \cdot z \]

      7. distribute-rgt-neg-in 89.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-2\right)}}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \cdot z \]

      8. metadata-eval 89.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot \color{blue}{-2}}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \cdot z \]

      9. *-commutative 89.2%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot -2}{\color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot z\right)} \cdot z - y \cdot t} \cdot z \]

      10. associate-*l* 89.2%

          \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot -2}{\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)} - y \cdot t} \cdot z \]

      11. fma-neg 89.2%

          \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot -2}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, z \cdot z, -y \cdot t\right)}} \cdot z \]

   3. Simplified 89.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{y \cdot -2}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, z \cdot z, -y \cdot t\right)} \cdot z} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 93.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + -1 \cdot \frac{y}{z}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 93.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{y}{z}\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 93.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y}{z}} \]

   6. Simplified 93.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y}{z}} \]

   if -1.15e-5 < z < 1.75000000000000011e30

   1. Initial program 91.1%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 96.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}} \]

      2. associate-*l* 96.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right)} - y \cdot t}{z}} \]

   3. Simplified 96.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{z \cdot \left(2 \cdot z\right) - y \cdot t}{z}}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 93.4%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{-2 \cdot \frac{z}{t}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r/ 93.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{-2 \cdot z}{t}} \]

      2. *-commutative 93.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot -2}}{t} \]

   6. Simplified 93.4%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{z \cdot -2}{t}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 93.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.15 \cdot 10^{-5} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 1.75 \cdot 10^{+30}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{z \cdot -2}{t}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 81.8% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -6.5 \cdot 10^{+40} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 5.8 \cdot 10^{+62}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= z -6.5e+40) (not (<= z 5.8e+62))) (- x (/ y z)) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -6.5e+40) || !(z <= 5.8e+62)) {
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((z <= (-6.5d+40)) .or. (.not. (z <= 5.8d+62))) then
        tmp = x - (y / z)
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if ((z <= -6.5e+40) || !(z <= 5.8e+62)) {
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if (z <= -6.5e+40) or not (z <= 5.8e+62):
		tmp = x - (y / z)
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((z <= -6.5e+40) || !(z <= 5.8e+62))
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(y / z));
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((z <= -6.5e+40) || ~((z <= 5.8e+62)))
		tmp = x - (y / z);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[Or[LessEqual[z, -6.5e+40], N[Not[LessEqual[z, 5.8e+62]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x - N[(y / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], x]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -6.5000000000000001e40 or 5.79999999999999968e62 < z

   1. Initial program 69.8%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 69.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(-\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}\right)} \]

      2. associate-/l* 87.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}}\right) \]

      3. distribute-neg-frac 87.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{-y \cdot 2}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}} \]

      4. distribute-lft-neg-out 87.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot 2}}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}} \]

      5. associate-/r/ 87.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{\left(-y\right) \cdot 2}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \cdot z} \]

      6. distribute-lft-neg-out 87.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{-y \cdot 2}}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \cdot z \]

      7. distribute-rgt-neg-in 87.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-2\right)}}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \cdot z \]

      8. metadata-eval 87.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot \color{blue}{-2}}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \cdot z \]

      9. *-commutative 87.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot -2}{\color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot z\right)} \cdot z - y \cdot t} \cdot z \]

      10. associate-*l* 87.7%

          \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot -2}{\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)} - y \cdot t} \cdot z \]

      11. fma-neg 87.7%

          \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot -2}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, z \cdot z, -y \cdot t\right)}} \cdot z \]

   3. Simplified 87.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{y \cdot -2}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, z \cdot z, -y \cdot t\right)} \cdot z} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 95.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + -1 \cdot \frac{y}{z}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 95.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{y}{z}\right)} \]

      2. sub-neg 95.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y}{z}} \]

   6. Simplified 95.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{y}{z}} \]

   if -6.5000000000000001e40 < z < 5.79999999999999968e62

   1. Initial program 91.5%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 91.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(-\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}\right)} \]

      2. associate-/l* 96.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}}\right) \]

      3. distribute-neg-frac 96.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{-y \cdot 2}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}} \]

      4. distribute-lft-neg-out 96.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot 2}}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}} \]

      5. associate-/r/ 96.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{\left(-y\right) \cdot 2}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \cdot z} \]

      6. distribute-lft-neg-out 96.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{-y \cdot 2}}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \cdot z \]

      7. distribute-rgt-neg-in 96.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-2\right)}}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \cdot z \]

      8. metadata-eval 96.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot \color{blue}{-2}}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \cdot z \]

      9. *-commutative 96.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot -2}{\color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot z\right)} \cdot z - y \cdot t} \cdot z \]

      10. associate-*l* 96.7%

          \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot -2}{\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)} - y \cdot t} \cdot z \]

      11. fma-neg 96.7%

          \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot -2}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, z \cdot z, -y \cdot t\right)}} \cdot z \]

   3. Simplified 96.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{y \cdot -2}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, z \cdot z, -y \cdot t\right)} \cdot z} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 77.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 85.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -6.5 \cdot 10^{+40} \lor \neg \left(z \leq 5.8 \cdot 10^{+62}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6: 75.1% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-166}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.45 \cdot 10^{-261}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \frac{z}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -1e-166) x (if (<= x 1.45e-261) (* 2.0 (/ z t)) x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1e-166) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (x <= 1.45e-261) {
		tmp = 2.0 * (z / t);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-1d-166)) then
        tmp = x
    else if (x <= 1.45d-261) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * (z / t)
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1e-166) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (x <= 1.45e-261) {
		tmp = 2.0 * (z / t);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -1e-166:
		tmp = x
	elif x <= 1.45e-261:
		tmp = 2.0 * (z / t)
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -1e-166)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (x <= 1.45e-261)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * Float64(z / t));
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -1e-166)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (x <= 1.45e-261)
		tmp = 2.0 * (z / t);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[x, -1e-166], x, If[LessEqual[x, 1.45e-261], N[(2.0 * N[(z / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], x]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1.00000000000000004e-166 or 1.44999999999999993e-261 < x

   1. Initial program 84.3%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 84.3%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(-\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}\right)} \]

      2. associate-/l* 94.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}}\right) \]

      3. distribute-neg-frac 94.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{-y \cdot 2}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}} \]

      4. distribute-lft-neg-out 94.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot 2}}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}} \]

      5. associate-/r/ 94.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{\left(-y\right) \cdot 2}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \cdot z} \]

      6. distribute-lft-neg-out 94.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{-y \cdot 2}}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \cdot z \]

      7. distribute-rgt-neg-in 94.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-2\right)}}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \cdot z \]

      8. metadata-eval 94.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot \color{blue}{-2}}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \cdot z \]

      9. *-commutative 94.3%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot -2}{\color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot z\right)} \cdot z - y \cdot t} \cdot z \]

      10. associate-*l* 94.3%

          \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot -2}{\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)} - y \cdot t} \cdot z \]

      11. fma-neg 94.3%

          \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot -2}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, z \cdot z, -y \cdot t\right)}} \cdot z \]

   3. Simplified 94.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{y \cdot -2}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, z \cdot z, -y \cdot t\right)} \cdot z} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 87.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -1.00000000000000004e-166 < x < 1.44999999999999993e-261

   1. Initial program 60.6%

      \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 60.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(-\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}\right)} \]

      2. +-commutative 60.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}\right) + x} \]

      3. distribute-neg-frac 60.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}} + x \]

      4. distribute-rgt-neg-out 60.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)}}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} + x \]

      5. remove-double-neg 60.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)}{\color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z\right)\right)} - y \cdot t} + x \]

      6. distribute-rgt-neg-in 60.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)}{\left(-\color{blue}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)}\right) - y \cdot t} + x \]

      7. distribute-lft-neg-out 60.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)}{\color{blue}{\left(-z \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)} - y \cdot t} + x \]

      8. distribute-lft-neg-out 60.6%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(-z\right)}{\color{blue}{\left(\left(-z\right) \cdot 2\right)} \cdot \left(-z\right) - y \cdot t} + x \]

      9. associate-/l* 79.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{\left(\left(-z\right) \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(-z\right) - y \cdot t}{-z}}} + x \]

      10. associate-*l/ 79.0%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{\left(\left(-z\right) \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(-z\right) - y \cdot t}{-z}} \cdot 2} + x \]

      11. fma-def 79.0%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{y}{\frac{\left(\left(-z\right) \cdot 2\right) \cdot \left(-z\right) - y \cdot t}{-z}}, 2, x\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 92.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\frac{y}{z \cdot -2 + \frac{t}{z} \cdot y}, 2, x\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 66.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \frac{y}{-2 \cdot z + \frac{t \cdot y}{z}}} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in y around inf 58.7%

      \[\leadsto 2 \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{z}{t}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 84.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1 \cdot 10^{-166}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 1.45 \cdot 10^{-261}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot \frac{z}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 7: 75.4% accurate, 17.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 81.7%

   \[x - \frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 81.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(-\frac{\left(y \cdot 2\right) \cdot z}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}\right)} \]

   2. associate-/l* 92.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(-\color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot 2}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}}\right) \]

   3. distribute-neg-frac 92.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{-y \cdot 2}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}}} \]

   4. distribute-lft-neg-out 92.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) \cdot 2}}{\frac{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t}{z}} \]

   5. associate-/r/ 92.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\frac{\left(-y\right) \cdot 2}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \cdot z} \]

   6. distribute-lft-neg-out 92.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{-y \cdot 2}}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \cdot z \]

   7. distribute-rgt-neg-in 92.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(-2\right)}}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \cdot z \]

   8. metadata-eval 92.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot \color{blue}{-2}}{\left(z \cdot 2\right) \cdot z - y \cdot t} \cdot z \]

   9. *-commutative 92.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot -2}{\color{blue}{\left(2 \cdot z\right)} \cdot z - y \cdot t} \cdot z \]

   10. associate-*l* 92.6%

       \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot -2}{\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)} - y \cdot t} \cdot z \]

   11. fma-neg 92.6%

       \[\leadsto x + \frac{y \cdot -2}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, z \cdot z, -y \cdot t\right)}} \cdot z \]

3. Simplified 92.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{y \cdot -2}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, z \cdot z, -y \cdot t\right)} \cdot z} \]

4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 80.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

5. Final simplification 80.1%

   \[\leadsto x \]

Developer target: 99.9% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{1}{\frac{z}{y} - \frac{\frac{t}{2}}{z}} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- x (/ 1.0 (- (/ z y) (/ (/ t 2.0) z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (1.0 / ((z / y) - ((t / 2.0) / z)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x - (1.0d0 / ((z / y) - ((t / 2.0d0) / z)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (1.0 / ((z / y) - ((t / 2.0) / z)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - (1.0 / ((z / y) - ((t / 2.0) / z)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(1.0 / Float64(Float64(z / y) - Float64(Float64(t / 2.0) / z))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x - (1.0 / ((z / y) - ((t / 2.0) / z)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(1.0 / N[(N[(z / y), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[(t / 2.0), $MachinePrecision] / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023275 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "Numeric.AD.Rank1.Halley:findZero from ad-4.2.4"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (- x (/ 1.0 (- (/ z y) (/ (/ t 2.0) z))))

  (- x (/ (* (* y 2.0) z) (- (* (* z 2.0) z) (* y t)))))