Numeric.SpecFunctions:invIncompleteBetaWorker from math-functions-0.1.5.2, G

Percentage Accurate: 85.3% → 99.7%

Time: 10.2s

Alternatives: 6

Speedup: 14.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (/ (exp (* y (log (/ y (+ z y))))) y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (exp((y * log((y / (z + y))))) / y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (exp((y * log((y / (z + y))))) / y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (Math.exp((y * Math.log((y / (z + y))))) / y);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (math.exp((y * math.log((y / (z + y))))) / y)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(exp(Float64(y * log(Float64(y / Float64(z + y))))) / y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (exp((y * log((y / (z + y))))) / y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(N[Exp[N[(y * N[Log[N[(y / N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 85.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (/ (exp (* y (log (/ y (+ z y))))) y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (exp((y * log((y / (z + y))))) / y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (exp((y * log((y / (z + y))))) / y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (Math.exp((y * Math.log((y / (z + y))))) / y);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (math.exp((y * math.log((y / (z + y))))) / y)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(exp(Float64(y * log(Float64(y / Float64(z + y))))) / y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (exp((y * log((y / (z + y))))) / y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(N[Exp[N[(y * N[Log[N[(y / N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.7% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+40} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 10^{-13}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{e^{-z}}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -1e+40) (not (<= y 1e-13)))
   (+ x (/ (exp (- z)) y))
   (+ x (/ (pow (exp y) (log (/ y (+ y z)))) y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -1e+40) || !(y <= 1e-13)) {
		tmp = x + (exp(-z) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (pow(exp(y), log((y / (y + z)))) / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-1d+40)) .or. (.not. (y <= 1d-13))) then
        tmp = x + (exp(-z) / y)
    else
        tmp = x + ((exp(y) ** log((y / (y + z)))) / y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -1e+40) || !(y <= 1e-13)) {
		tmp = x + (Math.exp(-z) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (Math.pow(Math.exp(y), Math.log((y / (y + z)))) / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -1e+40) or not (y <= 1e-13):
		tmp = x + (math.exp(-z) / y)
	else:
		tmp = x + (math.pow(math.exp(y), math.log((y / (y + z)))) / y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -1e+40) || !(y <= 1e-13))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(exp(Float64(-z)) / y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64((exp(y) ^ log(Float64(y / Float64(y + z)))) / y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -1e+40) || ~((y <= 1e-13)))
		tmp = x + (exp(-z) / y);
	else
		tmp = x + ((exp(y) ^ log((y / (y + z)))) / y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -1e+40], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 1e-13]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(N[Exp[(-z)], $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(N[Power[N[Exp[y], $MachinePrecision], N[Log[N[(y / N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -1.00000000000000003e40 or 1e-13 < y

   1. Initial program 81.0%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 81.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{e^{\color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right) \cdot y}}}{y} \]

      2. exp-to-pow 81.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}^{y}}}{y} \]

      3. +-commutative 81.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}^{y}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 81.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}^{y}}{y}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{e^{-1 \cdot z}}}{y} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{e^{\color{blue}{-z}}}{y} \]

   6. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{e^{-z}}}{y} \]

   if -1.00000000000000003e40 < y < 1e-13

   1. Initial program 82.3%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. exp-prod 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      2. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1 \cdot 10^{+40} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 10^{-13}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{e^{-z}}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 2: 99.6% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.5 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 10^{-13}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{e^{-z}}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{y}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -1.5) (not (<= y 1e-13)))
   (+ x (/ (exp (- z)) y))
   (+ x (/ 1.0 y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -1.5) || !(y <= 1e-13)) {
		tmp = x + (exp(-z) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-1.5d0)) .or. (.not. (y <= 1d-13))) then
        tmp = x + (exp(-z) / y)
    else
        tmp = x + (1.0d0 / y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -1.5) || !(y <= 1e-13)) {
		tmp = x + (Math.exp(-z) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -1.5) or not (y <= 1e-13):
		tmp = x + (math.exp(-z) / y)
	else:
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -1.5) || !(y <= 1e-13))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(exp(Float64(-z)) / y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(1.0 / y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -1.5) || ~((y <= 1e-13)))
		tmp = x + (exp(-z) / y);
	else
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -1.5], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 1e-13]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(N[Exp[(-z)], $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(1.0 / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -1.5 or 1e-13 < y

   1. Initial program 82.1%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 82.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{e^{\color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right) \cdot y}}}{y} \]

      2. exp-to-pow 82.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}^{y}}}{y} \]

      3. +-commutative 82.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}^{y}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 82.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}^{y}}{y}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{e^{-1 \cdot z}}}{y} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{e^{\color{blue}{-z}}}{y} \]

   6. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{e^{-z}}}{y} \]

   if -1.5 < y < 1e-13

   1. Initial program 80.8%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. exp-prod 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      2. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{1}{y}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y} + x} \]

   6. Simplified 99.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y} + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 99.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1.5 \lor \neg \left(y \leq 10^{-13}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{e^{-z}}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{y}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 87.0% accurate, 14.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{\left(1 - z\right) + z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.5\right)}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{y}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -1.0) (+ x (/ (+ (- 1.0 z) (* z (* z 0.5))) y)) (+ x (/ 1.0 y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.0) {
		tmp = x + (((1.0 - z) + (z * (z * 0.5))) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-1.0d0)) then
        tmp = x + (((1.0d0 - z) + (z * (z * 0.5d0))) / y)
    else
        tmp = x + (1.0d0 / y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -1.0) {
		tmp = x + (((1.0 - z) + (z * (z * 0.5))) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -1.0:
		tmp = x + (((1.0 - z) + (z * (z * 0.5))) / y)
	else:
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -1.0)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(Float64(Float64(1.0 - z) + Float64(z * Float64(z * 0.5))) / y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(1.0 / y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -1.0)
		tmp = x + (((1.0 - z) + (z * (z * 0.5))) / y);
	else
		tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -1.0], N[(x + N[(N[(N[(1.0 - z), $MachinePrecision] + N[(z * N[(z * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(1.0 / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -1

   1. Initial program 81.1%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. exp-prod 81.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      2. +-commutative 81.1%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 81.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 60.7%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{1 + \left(-1 \cdot z + \left(0.5 \cdot \frac{-1 \cdot {z}^{2} + 2 \cdot {z}^{2}}{y} + 0.5 \cdot {z}^{2}\right)\right)}}{y} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-+r+ 60.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right) + \left(0.5 \cdot \frac{-1 \cdot {z}^{2} + 2 \cdot {z}^{2}}{y} + 0.5 \cdot {z}^{2}\right)}}{y} \]

      2. +-commutative 60.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot {z}^{2} + 0.5 \cdot \frac{-1 \cdot {z}^{2} + 2 \cdot {z}^{2}}{y}\right)}}{y} \]

      3. associate-+r+ 60.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right) + 0.5 \cdot {z}^{2}\right) + 0.5 \cdot \frac{-1 \cdot {z}^{2} + 2 \cdot {z}^{2}}{y}}}{y} \]

      4. associate-*r/ 60.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right) + 0.5 \cdot {z}^{2}\right) + \color{blue}{\frac{0.5 \cdot \left(-1 \cdot {z}^{2} + 2 \cdot {z}^{2}\right)}{y}}}{y} \]

      5. distribute-rgt-out 60.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right) + 0.5 \cdot {z}^{2}\right) + \frac{0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left({z}^{2} \cdot \left(-1 + 2\right)\right)}}{y}}{y} \]

      6. metadata-eval 60.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right) + 0.5 \cdot {z}^{2}\right) + \frac{0.5 \cdot \left({z}^{2} \cdot \color{blue}{1}\right)}{y}}{y} \]

      7. *-rgt-identity 60.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right) + 0.5 \cdot {z}^{2}\right) + \frac{0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{{z}^{2}}}{y}}{y} \]

      8. associate-*l/ 60.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right) + 0.5 \cdot {z}^{2}\right) + \color{blue}{\frac{0.5}{y} \cdot {z}^{2}}}{y} \]

      9. metadata-eval 60.7%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right) + 0.5 \cdot {z}^{2}\right) + \frac{\color{blue}{0.5 \cdot 1}}{y} \cdot {z}^{2}}{y} \]

      10. associate-*r/ 60.7%

          \[\leadsto x + \frac{\left(\left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right) + 0.5 \cdot {z}^{2}\right) + \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \frac{1}{y}\right)} \cdot {z}^{2}}{y} \]

      11. associate-+r+ 60.7%

          \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right) + \left(0.5 \cdot {z}^{2} + \left(0.5 \cdot \frac{1}{y}\right) \cdot {z}^{2}\right)}}{y} \]

      12. distribute-rgt-in 76.5%

          \[\leadsto x + \frac{\left(1 + -1 \cdot z\right) + \color{blue}{{z}^{2} \cdot \left(0.5 + 0.5 \cdot \frac{1}{y}\right)}}{y} \]

   6. Simplified 76.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{\left(1 - z\right) + \left(z \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(0.5 + \frac{0.5}{y}\right)}}{y} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in y around inf 76.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\left(1 - z\right) + \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot {z}^{2}}}{y} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 76.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\left(1 - z\right) + 0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right)}}{y} \]

      2. *-commutative 76.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\left(1 - z\right) + \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right) \cdot 0.5}}{y} \]

      3. associate-*r* 76.5%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\left(1 - z\right) + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.5\right)}}{y} \]

   9. Simplified 76.5%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\left(1 - z\right) + \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.5\right)}}{y} \]

   if -1 < y

   1. Initial program 81.8%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. exp-prod 92.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      2. +-commutative 92.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 92.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 89.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{1}{y}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 89.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y} + x} \]

   6. Simplified 89.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y} + x} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 85.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -1:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{\left(1 - z\right) + z \cdot \left(z \cdot 0.5\right)}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{1}{y}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 68.3% accurate, 29.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -5 \cdot 10^{-57}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 2.45 \cdot 10^{-14}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -5e-57) x (if (<= y 2.45e-14) (/ 1.0 y) x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -5e-57) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (y <= 2.45e-14) {
		tmp = 1.0 / y;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-5d-57)) then
        tmp = x
    else if (y <= 2.45d-14) then
        tmp = 1.0d0 / y
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -5e-57) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (y <= 2.45e-14) {
		tmp = 1.0 / y;
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -5e-57:
		tmp = x
	elif y <= 2.45e-14:
		tmp = 1.0 / y
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -5e-57)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (y <= 2.45e-14)
		tmp = Float64(1.0 / y);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -5e-57)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (y <= 2.45e-14)
		tmp = 1.0 / y;
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -5e-57], x, If[LessEqual[y, 2.45e-14], N[(1.0 / y), $MachinePrecision], x]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -5.0000000000000002e-57 or 2.44999999999999997e-14 < y

   1. Initial program 82.8%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. exp-prod 83.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      2. +-commutative 83.4%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 83.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 66.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -5.0000000000000002e-57 < y < 2.44999999999999997e-14

   1. Initial program 79.3%

      \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. exp-prod 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

      2. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 81.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 72.1%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -5 \cdot 10^{-57}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 2.45 \cdot 10^{-14}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 84.4% accurate, 42.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{1}{y} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (/ 1.0 y)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (1.0 / y);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (1.0d0 / y)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (1.0 / y);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (1.0 / y)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(1.0 / y))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (1.0 / y);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(1.0 / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 81.6%

   \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. exp-prod 89.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

   2. +-commutative 89.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

3. Simplified 89.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]

4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 82.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{1}{y}} \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 82.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y} + x} \]

6. Simplified 82.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{y} + x} \]

7. Final simplification 82.9%

   \[\leadsto x + \frac{1}{y} \]

Alternative 6: 49.4% accurate, 211.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 81.6%

   \[x + \frac{e^{y \cdot \log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}{y} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. exp-prod 89.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{\color{blue}{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{z + y}\right)}}}{y} \]

   2. +-commutative 89.3%

      \[\leadsto x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{\color{blue}{y + z}}\right)}}{y} \]

3. Simplified 89.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \frac{{\left(e^{y}\right)}^{\log \left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}}{y}} \]

4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 49.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

5. Final simplification 49.8%

   \[\leadsto x \]

Developer target: 91.3% accurate, 0.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{y}{z + y} < 7.11541576 \cdot 10^{-315}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{e^{\frac{-1}{z}}}{y}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{e^{\log \left({\left(\frac{y}{y + z}\right)}^{y}\right)}}{y}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (< (/ y (+ z y)) 7.11541576e-315)
   (+ x (/ (exp (/ -1.0 z)) y))
   (+ x (/ (exp (log (pow (/ y (+ y z)) y))) y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y / (z + y)) < 7.11541576e-315) {
		tmp = x + (exp((-1.0 / z)) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (exp(log(pow((y / (y + z)), y))) / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y / (z + y)) < 7.11541576d-315) then
        tmp = x + (exp(((-1.0d0) / z)) / y)
    else
        tmp = x + (exp(log(((y / (y + z)) ** y))) / y)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y / (z + y)) < 7.11541576e-315) {
		tmp = x + (Math.exp((-1.0 / z)) / y);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (Math.exp(Math.log(Math.pow((y / (y + z)), y))) / y);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y / (z + y)) < 7.11541576e-315:
		tmp = x + (math.exp((-1.0 / z)) / y)
	else:
		tmp = x + (math.exp(math.log(math.pow((y / (y + z)), y))) / y)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(y / Float64(z + y)) < 7.11541576e-315)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(exp(Float64(-1.0 / z)) / y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(exp(log((Float64(y / Float64(y + z)) ^ y))) / y));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y / (z + y)) < 7.11541576e-315)
		tmp = x + (exp((-1.0 / z)) / y);
	else
		tmp = x + (exp(log(((y / (y + z)) ^ y))) / y);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Less[N[(y / N[(z + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 7.11541576e-315], N[(x + N[(N[Exp[N[(-1.0 / z), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(N[Exp[N[Log[N[Power[N[(y / N[(y + z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], y], $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023275 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Numeric.SpecFunctions:invIncompleteBetaWorker from math-functions-0.1.5.2, G"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (if (< (/ y (+ z y)) 7.11541576e-315) (+ x (/ (exp (/ -1.0 z)) y)) (+ x (/ (exp (log (pow (/ y (+ y z)) y))) y)))

  (+ x (/ (exp (* y (log (/ y (+ z y))))) y)))