2frac (problem 3.3.1)

Percentage Accurate: 76.9% → 99.9%

Time: 6.3s

Alternatives: 6

Speedup: 1.3×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{1}{x + 1} - \frac{1}{x} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x) :precision binary64 (- (/ 1.0 (+ x 1.0)) (/ 1.0 x)))

C

double code(double x) {
	return (1.0 / (x + 1.0)) - (1.0 / x);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = (1.0d0 / (x + 1.0d0)) - (1.0d0 / x)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x) {
	return (1.0 / (x + 1.0)) - (1.0 / x);
}

Python

def code(x):
	return (1.0 / (x + 1.0)) - (1.0 / x)

Julia

function code(x)
	return Float64(Float64(1.0 / Float64(x + 1.0)) - Float64(1.0 / x))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x)
	tmp = (1.0 / (x + 1.0)) - (1.0 / x);
end

Wolfram

code[x_] := N[(N[(1.0 / N[(x + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(1.0 / x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 76.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{1}{x + 1} - \frac{1}{x} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x) :precision binary64 (- (/ 1.0 (+ x 1.0)) (/ 1.0 x)))

C

double code(double x) {
	return (1.0 / (x + 1.0)) - (1.0 / x);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = (1.0d0 / (x + 1.0d0)) - (1.0d0 / x)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x) {
	return (1.0 / (x + 1.0)) - (1.0 / x);
}

Python

def code(x):
	return (1.0 / (x + 1.0)) - (1.0 / x)

Julia

function code(x)
	return Float64(Float64(1.0 / Float64(x + 1.0)) - Float64(1.0 / x))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x)
	tmp = (1.0 / (x + 1.0)) - (1.0 / x);
end

Wolfram

code[x_] := N[(N[(1.0 / N[(x + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(1.0 / x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.9% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{\frac{-1}{x}}{x + 1} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x) :precision binary64 (/ (/ -1.0 x) (+ x 1.0)))

C

double code(double x) {
	return (-1.0 / x) / (x + 1.0);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = ((-1.0d0) / x) / (x + 1.0d0)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x) {
	return (-1.0 / x) / (x + 1.0);
}

Python

def code(x):
	return (-1.0 / x) / (x + 1.0)

Julia

function code(x)
	return Float64(Float64(-1.0 / x) / Float64(x + 1.0))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x)
	tmp = (-1.0 / x) / (x + 1.0);
end

Wolfram

code[x_] := N[(N[(-1.0 / x), $MachinePrecision] / N[(x + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 74.7%

   \[\frac{1}{x + 1} - \frac{1}{x} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 74.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{x + 1} + \left(-\frac{1}{x}\right)} \]

   2. +-commutative 74.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\color{blue}{1 + x}} + \left(-\frac{1}{x}\right) \]

   3. distribute-neg-frac 74.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{1 + x} + \color{blue}{\frac{-1}{x}} \]

   4. metadata-eval 74.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{1 + x} + \frac{\color{blue}{-1}}{x} \]

3. Applied egg-rr 74.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{1 + x} + \frac{-1}{x}} \]

5. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{-1}{x}}{x + 1}} \]

6. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{-1}{x}}{x + 1} \]

Alternative 2: 97.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 0.76\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{-1}{x \cdot x}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 + \frac{-1}{x}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -1.0) (not (<= x 0.76))) (/ -1.0 (* x x)) (+ 1.0 (/ -1.0 x))))

C

double code(double x) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.0) || !(x <= 0.76)) {
		tmp = -1.0 / (x * x);
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 + (-1.0 / x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-1.0d0)) .or. (.not. (x <= 0.76d0))) then
        tmp = (-1.0d0) / (x * x)
    else
        tmp = 1.0d0 + ((-1.0d0) / x)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.0) || !(x <= 0.76)) {
		tmp = -1.0 / (x * x);
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 + (-1.0 / x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -1.0) or not (x <= 0.76):
		tmp = -1.0 / (x * x)
	else:
		tmp = 1.0 + (-1.0 / x)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -1.0) || !(x <= 0.76))
		tmp = Float64(-1.0 / Float64(x * x));
	else
		tmp = Float64(1.0 + Float64(-1.0 / x));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -1.0) || ~((x <= 0.76)))
		tmp = -1.0 / (x * x);
	else
		tmp = 1.0 + (-1.0 / x);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -1.0], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 0.76]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(-1.0 / N[(x * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(1.0 + N[(-1.0 / x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1 or 0.76000000000000001 < x

   1. Initial program 46.5%

      \[\frac{1}{x + 1} - \frac{1}{x} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around inf 96.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-1}{{x}^{2}}} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 96.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{-1}{\color{blue}{x \cdot x}} \]

   4. Simplified 96.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-1}{x \cdot x}} \]

   if -1 < x < 0.76000000000000001

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{1}{x + 1} - \frac{1}{x} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 - \frac{1}{x}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 0.76\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{-1}{x \cdot x}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 + \frac{-1}{x}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 98.4% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 0.76\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{-1}{x}}{x}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 + \frac{-1}{x}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -1.0) (not (<= x 0.76))) (/ (/ -1.0 x) x) (+ 1.0 (/ -1.0 x))))

C

double code(double x) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.0) || !(x <= 0.76)) {
		tmp = (-1.0 / x) / x;
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 + (-1.0 / x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-1.0d0)) .or. (.not. (x <= 0.76d0))) then
        tmp = ((-1.0d0) / x) / x
    else
        tmp = 1.0d0 + ((-1.0d0) / x)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.0) || !(x <= 0.76)) {
		tmp = (-1.0 / x) / x;
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0 + (-1.0 / x);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -1.0) or not (x <= 0.76):
		tmp = (-1.0 / x) / x
	else:
		tmp = 1.0 + (-1.0 / x)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -1.0) || !(x <= 0.76))
		tmp = Float64(Float64(-1.0 / x) / x);
	else
		tmp = Float64(1.0 + Float64(-1.0 / x));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -1.0) || ~((x <= 0.76)))
		tmp = (-1.0 / x) / x;
	else
		tmp = 1.0 + (-1.0 / x);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -1.0], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 0.76]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(N[(-1.0 / x), $MachinePrecision] / x), $MachinePrecision], N[(1.0 + N[(-1.0 / x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1 or 0.76000000000000001 < x

   1. Initial program 46.5%

      \[\frac{1}{x + 1} - \frac{1}{x} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. clear-num 46.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{x + 1}{1}}} - \frac{1}{x} \]

      2. frac-sub 48.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot x - \frac{x + 1}{1} \cdot 1}{\frac{x + 1}{1} \cdot x}} \]

      3. *-commutative 48.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1 \cdot x - \color{blue}{1 \cdot \frac{x + 1}{1}}}{\frac{x + 1}{1} \cdot x} \]

      4. *-un-lft-identity 48.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{1 \cdot x - \color{blue}{\frac{x + 1}{1}}}{\frac{x + 1}{1} \cdot x} \]

      5. *-un-lft-identity 48.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{x} - \frac{x + 1}{1}}{\frac{x + 1}{1} \cdot x} \]

      6. div-inv 48.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x - \color{blue}{\left(x + 1\right) \cdot \frac{1}{1}}}{\frac{x + 1}{1} \cdot x} \]

      7. metadata-eval 48.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x - \left(x + 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{1}}{\frac{x + 1}{1} \cdot x} \]

      8. *-rgt-identity 48.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x - \color{blue}{\left(x + 1\right)}}{\frac{x + 1}{1} \cdot x} \]

      9. +-commutative 48.4%

         \[\leadsto \frac{x - \color{blue}{\left(1 + x\right)}}{\frac{x + 1}{1} \cdot x} \]

      10. *-commutative 48.4%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x - \left(1 + x\right)}{\color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{x + 1}{1}}} \]

      11. div-inv 48.4%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x - \left(1 + x\right)}{x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + 1\right) \cdot \frac{1}{1}\right)}} \]

      12. metadata-eval 48.4%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x - \left(1 + x\right)}{x \cdot \left(\left(x + 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{1}\right)} \]

      13. *-rgt-identity 48.4%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x - \left(1 + x\right)}{x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + 1\right)}} \]

      14. +-commutative 48.4%

          \[\leadsto \frac{x - \left(1 + x\right)}{x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + x\right)}} \]

   3. Applied egg-rr 48.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x - \left(1 + x\right)}{x \cdot \left(1 + x\right)}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 98.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{-1}}{x \cdot \left(1 + x\right)} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in x around inf 96.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-1}{{x}^{2}}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow2 96.7%

         \[\leadsto \frac{-1}{\color{blue}{x \cdot x}} \]

      2. associate-/r* 97.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{-1}{x}}{x}} \]

   7. Simplified 97.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{-1}{x}}{x}} \]

   if -1 < x < 0.76000000000000001

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\frac{1}{x + 1} - \frac{1}{x} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 99.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 - \frac{1}{x}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 98.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1 \lor \neg \left(x \leq 0.76\right):\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{-1}{x}}{x}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;1 + \frac{-1}{x}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 99.4% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{-1}{x \cdot \left(x + 1\right)} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x) :precision binary64 (/ -1.0 (* x (+ x 1.0))))

C

double code(double x) {
	return -1.0 / (x * (x + 1.0));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = (-1.0d0) / (x * (x + 1.0d0))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x) {
	return -1.0 / (x * (x + 1.0));
}

Python

def code(x):
	return -1.0 / (x * (x + 1.0))

Julia

function code(x)
	return Float64(-1.0 / Float64(x * Float64(x + 1.0)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x)
	tmp = -1.0 / (x * (x + 1.0));
end

Wolfram

code[x_] := N[(-1.0 / N[(x * N[(x + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 74.7%

   \[\frac{1}{x + 1} - \frac{1}{x} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. clear-num 74.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{x + 1}{1}}} - \frac{1}{x} \]

   2. frac-sub 75.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1 \cdot x - \frac{x + 1}{1} \cdot 1}{\frac{x + 1}{1} \cdot x}} \]

   3. *-commutative 75.6%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1 \cdot x - \color{blue}{1 \cdot \frac{x + 1}{1}}}{\frac{x + 1}{1} \cdot x} \]

   4. *-un-lft-identity 75.6%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1 \cdot x - \color{blue}{\frac{x + 1}{1}}}{\frac{x + 1}{1} \cdot x} \]

   5. *-un-lft-identity 75.6%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{x} - \frac{x + 1}{1}}{\frac{x + 1}{1} \cdot x} \]

   6. div-inv 75.6%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x - \color{blue}{\left(x + 1\right) \cdot \frac{1}{1}}}{\frac{x + 1}{1} \cdot x} \]

   7. metadata-eval 75.6%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x - \left(x + 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{1}}{\frac{x + 1}{1} \cdot x} \]

   8. *-rgt-identity 75.6%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x - \color{blue}{\left(x + 1\right)}}{\frac{x + 1}{1} \cdot x} \]

   9. +-commutative 75.6%

      \[\leadsto \frac{x - \color{blue}{\left(1 + x\right)}}{\frac{x + 1}{1} \cdot x} \]

   10. *-commutative 75.6%

       \[\leadsto \frac{x - \left(1 + x\right)}{\color{blue}{x \cdot \frac{x + 1}{1}}} \]

   11. div-inv 75.6%

       \[\leadsto \frac{x - \left(1 + x\right)}{x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(x + 1\right) \cdot \frac{1}{1}\right)}} \]

   12. metadata-eval 75.6%

       \[\leadsto \frac{x - \left(1 + x\right)}{x \cdot \left(\left(x + 1\right) \cdot \color{blue}{1}\right)} \]

   13. *-rgt-identity 75.6%

       \[\leadsto \frac{x - \left(1 + x\right)}{x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(x + 1\right)}} \]

   14. +-commutative 75.6%

       \[\leadsto \frac{x - \left(1 + x\right)}{x \cdot \color{blue}{\left(1 + x\right)}} \]

3. Applied egg-rr 75.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{x - \left(1 + x\right)}{x \cdot \left(1 + x\right)}} \]

4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 99.4%

   \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{-1}}{x \cdot \left(1 + x\right)} \]

5. Final simplification 99.4%

   \[\leadsto \frac{-1}{x \cdot \left(x + 1\right)} \]

Alternative 5: 51.1% accurate, 3.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{-1}{x} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x) :precision binary64 (/ -1.0 x))

C

double code(double x) {
	return -1.0 / x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = (-1.0d0) / x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x) {
	return -1.0 / x;
}

Python

def code(x):
	return -1.0 / x

Julia

function code(x)
	return Float64(-1.0 / x)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x)
	tmp = -1.0 / x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_] := N[(-1.0 / x), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 74.7%

   \[\frac{1}{x + 1} - \frac{1}{x} \]

2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 54.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-1}{x}} \]

3. Final simplification 54.5%

   \[\leadsto \frac{-1}{x} \]

Alternative 6: 2.9% accurate, 9.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 1 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x) :precision binary64 1.0)

C

double code(double x) {
	return 1.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = 1.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double x) {
	return 1.0;
}

Python

def code(x):
	return 1.0

Julia

function code(x)
	return 1.0
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x)
	tmp = 1.0;
end

Wolfram

code[x_] := 1.0

Derivation

1. Initial program 74.7%

   \[\frac{1}{x + 1} - \frac{1}{x} \]

2. Taylor expanded in x around 0 53.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1 - \frac{1}{x}} \]

3. Taylor expanded in x around inf 2.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{1} \]

4. Final simplification 2.8%

   \[\leadsto 1 \]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023275 
(FPCore (x)
  :name "2frac (problem 3.3.1)"
  :precision binary64
  (- (/ 1.0 (+ x 1.0)) (/ 1.0 x)))