Equirectangular approximation to distance on a great circle

Percentage Accurate: 59.8% → 99.8%

Time: 26.0s

Alternatives: 9

Speedup: 3.0×

• 30.5% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\\ R \cdot \sqrt{t_0 \cdot t_0 + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi1 phi2) 2.0)))))
   (* R (sqrt (+ (* t_0 t_0) (* (- phi1 phi2) (- phi1 phi2)))))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	return R * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: t_0
    t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0d0))
    code = r * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	return R * Math.sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))
	return R * math.sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))))

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(Float64(phi1 + phi2) / 2.0)))
	return Float64(R * sqrt(Float64(Float64(t_0 * t_0) + Float64(Float64(phi1 - phi2) * Float64(phi1 - phi2)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	tmp = R * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(N[(phi1 + phi2), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(t$95$0 * t$95$0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] * N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Initial Program: 59.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\\ R \cdot \sqrt{t_0 \cdot t_0 + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi1 phi2) 2.0)))))
   (* R (sqrt (+ (* t_0 t_0) (* (- phi1 phi2) (- phi1 phi2)))))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	return R * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: t_0
    t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0d0))
    code = r * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))))
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	return R * Math.sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0))
	return R * math.sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))))

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(Float64(phi1 + phi2) / 2.0)))
	return Float64(R * sqrt(Float64(Float64(t_0 * t_0) + Float64(Float64(phi1 - phi2) * Float64(phi1 - phi2)))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	t_0 = (lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi1 + phi2) / 2.0));
	tmp = R * sqrt(((t_0 * t_0) + ((phi1 - phi2) * (phi1 - phi2))));
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(N[(phi1 + phi2), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(t$95$0 * t$95$0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] * N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Alternative 1: 99.8% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt{0.5 + 0.5 \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \phi_2, \cos \phi_1, -\sin \phi_2 \cdot \sin \phi_1\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  R
  (hypot
   (*
    (- lambda1 lambda2)
    (sqrt
     (+
      0.5
      (* 0.5 (fma (cos phi2) (cos phi1) (- (* (sin phi2) (sin phi1))))))))
   (- phi1 phi2))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * sqrt((0.5 + (0.5 * fma(cos(phi2), cos(phi1), -(sin(phi2) * sin(phi1))))))), (phi1 - phi2));
}

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(R * hypot(Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * sqrt(Float64(0.5 + Float64(0.5 * fma(cos(phi2), cos(phi1), Float64(-Float64(sin(phi2) * sin(phi1)))))))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)))
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Sqrt[N[(0.5 + N[(0.5 * N[(N[Cos[phi2], $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[phi1], $MachinePrecision] + (-N[(N[Sin[phi2], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sin[phi1], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision])), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 56.5%

   \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. hypot-def 97.0%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

3. Simplified 97.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. add-sqr-sqrt 59.6%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{\cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)} \cdot \sqrt{\cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)}\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   2. sqrt-unprod 97.0%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{\cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   3. sqr-cos-a 96.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{0.5 + 0.5 \cdot \cos \left(2 \cdot \frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   4. cos-2 96.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt{0.5 + 0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right) - \sin \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right) \cdot \sin \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right)}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   5. cos-sum 96.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt{0.5 + 0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2} + \frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   6. add-log-exp 25.4%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt{0.5 + 0.5 \cdot \cos \left(\color{blue}{\log \left(e^{\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}}\right)} + \frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   7. add-log-exp 25.4%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt{0.5 + 0.5 \cdot \cos \left(\log \left(e^{\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}}\right) + \color{blue}{\log \left(e^{\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}}\right)}\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   8. sum-log 25.4%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt{0.5 + 0.5 \cdot \cos \color{blue}{\log \left(e^{\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}} \cdot e^{\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}}\right)}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   9. exp-sqrt 25.4%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt{0.5 + 0.5 \cdot \cos \log \left(\color{blue}{\sqrt{e^{\phi_1 + \phi_2}}} \cdot e^{\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}}\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   10. exp-sqrt 25.4%

       \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt{0.5 + 0.5 \cdot \cos \log \left(\sqrt{e^{\phi_1 + \phi_2}} \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{e^{\phi_1 + \phi_2}}}\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   11. add-sqr-sqrt 25.4%

       \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt{0.5 + 0.5 \cdot \cos \log \color{blue}{\left(e^{\phi_1 + \phi_2}\right)}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   12. add-log-exp 96.9%

       \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt{0.5 + 0.5 \cdot \cos \color{blue}{\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

5. Applied egg-rr 96.9%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{0.5 + 0.5 \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 96.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt{0.5 + 0.5 \cdot \cos \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

7. Simplified 96.9%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{0.5 + 0.5 \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
8. Step-by-step derivation

   1. cos-sum 99.7%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt{0.5 + 0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \phi_2 \cdot \cos \phi_1 - \sin \phi_2 \cdot \sin \phi_1\right)}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   2. fma-neg 99.7%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt{0.5 + 0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \phi_2, \cos \phi_1, -\sin \phi_2 \cdot \sin \phi_1\right)}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

9. Applied egg-rr 99.7%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt{0.5 + 0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \phi_2, \cos \phi_1, -\sin \phi_2 \cdot \sin \phi_1\right)}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

10. Final simplification 99.7%

    \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt{0.5 + 0.5 \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(\cos \phi_2, \cos \phi_1, -\sin \phi_2 \cdot \sin \phi_1\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

Alternative 2: 99.8% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt{0.5 + 0.5 \cdot \left(\cos \phi_2 \cdot \cos \phi_1 - \sin \phi_2 \cdot \sin \phi_1\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  R
  (hypot
   (*
    (- lambda1 lambda2)
    (sqrt
     (+ 0.5 (* 0.5 (- (* (cos phi2) (cos phi1)) (* (sin phi2) (sin phi1)))))))
   (- phi1 phi2))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * sqrt((0.5 + (0.5 * ((cos(phi2) * cos(phi1)) - (sin(phi2) * sin(phi1))))))), (phi1 - phi2));
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * Math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.sqrt((0.5 + (0.5 * ((Math.cos(phi2) * Math.cos(phi1)) - (Math.sin(phi2) * Math.sin(phi1))))))), (phi1 - phi2));
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	return R * math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * math.sqrt((0.5 + (0.5 * ((math.cos(phi2) * math.cos(phi1)) - (math.sin(phi2) * math.sin(phi1))))))), (phi1 - phi2))

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(R * hypot(Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * sqrt(Float64(0.5 + Float64(0.5 * Float64(Float64(cos(phi2) * cos(phi1)) - Float64(sin(phi2) * sin(phi1))))))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * sqrt((0.5 + (0.5 * ((cos(phi2) * cos(phi1)) - (sin(phi2) * sin(phi1))))))), (phi1 - phi2));
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Sqrt[N[(0.5 + N[(0.5 * N[(N[(N[Cos[phi2], $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[phi1], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(N[Sin[phi2], $MachinePrecision] * N[Sin[phi1], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 56.5%

   \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. hypot-def 97.0%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

3. Simplified 97.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. add-sqr-sqrt 59.6%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt{\cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)} \cdot \sqrt{\cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)}\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   2. sqrt-unprod 97.0%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{\cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   3. sqr-cos-a 96.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{0.5 + 0.5 \cdot \cos \left(2 \cdot \frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   4. cos-2 96.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt{0.5 + 0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right) - \sin \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right) \cdot \sin \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right)}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   5. cos-sum 96.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt{0.5 + 0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2} + \frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   6. add-log-exp 25.4%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt{0.5 + 0.5 \cdot \cos \left(\color{blue}{\log \left(e^{\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}}\right)} + \frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   7. add-log-exp 25.4%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt{0.5 + 0.5 \cdot \cos \left(\log \left(e^{\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}}\right) + \color{blue}{\log \left(e^{\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}}\right)}\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   8. sum-log 25.4%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt{0.5 + 0.5 \cdot \cos \color{blue}{\log \left(e^{\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}} \cdot e^{\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}}\right)}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   9. exp-sqrt 25.4%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt{0.5 + 0.5 \cdot \cos \log \left(\color{blue}{\sqrt{e^{\phi_1 + \phi_2}}} \cdot e^{\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}}\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   10. exp-sqrt 25.4%

       \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt{0.5 + 0.5 \cdot \cos \log \left(\sqrt{e^{\phi_1 + \phi_2}} \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{e^{\phi_1 + \phi_2}}}\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   11. add-sqr-sqrt 25.4%

       \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt{0.5 + 0.5 \cdot \cos \log \color{blue}{\left(e^{\phi_1 + \phi_2}\right)}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   12. add-log-exp 96.9%

       \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt{0.5 + 0.5 \cdot \cos \color{blue}{\left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

5. Applied egg-rr 96.9%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{0.5 + 0.5 \cdot \cos \left(\phi_1 + \phi_2\right)}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 96.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt{0.5 + 0.5 \cdot \cos \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

7. Simplified 96.9%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\sqrt{0.5 + 0.5 \cdot \cos \left(\phi_2 + \phi_1\right)}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
8. Step-by-step derivation

   1. cos-sum 99.7%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt{0.5 + 0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \phi_2 \cdot \cos \phi_1 - \sin \phi_2 \cdot \sin \phi_1\right)}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

9. Applied egg-rr 99.7%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt{0.5 + 0.5 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \phi_2 \cdot \cos \phi_1 - \sin \phi_2 \cdot \sin \phi_1\right)}}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

10. Final simplification 99.7%

    \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \sqrt{0.5 + 0.5 \cdot \left(\cos \phi_2 \cdot \cos \phi_1 - \sin \phi_2 \cdot \sin \phi_1\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

Alternative 3: 96.1% accurate, 1.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_2 + \phi_1}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (*
  R
  (hypot (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi2 phi1) 2.0))) (- phi1 phi2))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi2 + phi1) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * Math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos(((phi2 + phi1) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	return R * math.hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos(((phi2 + phi1) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2))

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(R * hypot(Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(Float64(phi2 + phi1) / 2.0))), Float64(phi1 - phi2)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = R * hypot(((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(((phi2 + phi1) / 2.0))), (phi1 - phi2));
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(R * N[Sqrt[N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(N[(phi2 + phi1), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2 + N[(phi1 - phi2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 56.5%

   \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. hypot-def 97.0%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

3. Simplified 97.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 97.0%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_2 + \phi_1}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

Alternative 4: 76.7% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq 3.1 \cdot 10^{+72}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi2 3.1e+72)
   (* R (hypot phi1 (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (* 0.5 phi1)))))
   (* R (- phi2 phi1))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 3.1e+72) {
		tmp = R * hypot(phi1, ((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((0.5 * phi1))));
	} else {
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 3.1e+72) {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot(phi1, ((lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos((0.5 * phi1))));
	} else {
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi2 <= 3.1e+72:
		tmp = R * math.hypot(phi1, ((lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos((0.5 * phi1))))
	else:
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi2 <= 3.1e+72)
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(phi1, Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(0.5 * phi1)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * Float64(phi2 - phi1));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi2 <= 3.1e+72)
		tmp = R * hypot(phi1, ((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((0.5 * phi1))));
	else
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi2, 3.1e+72], N[(R * N[Sqrt[phi1 ^ 2 + N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi1), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * N[(phi2 - phi1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if phi2 < 3.09999999999999988e72

   1. Initial program 60.2%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 97.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 52.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}^{2} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2} + {\phi_1}^{2}} \cdot R} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 52.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \sqrt{{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}^{2} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2} + {\phi_1}^{2}}} \]

      2. +-commutative 52.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{{\phi_1}^{2} + {\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}^{2} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}}} \]

      3. unpow2 52.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1} + {\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}^{2} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}} \]

      4. unpow2 52.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1 + \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}} \]

      5. unpow2 52.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1 + \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right)}} \]

      6. unswap-sqr 52.4%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1 + \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right) \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right)}} \]

      7. hypot-def 78.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 78.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right)} \]

   if 3.09999999999999988e72 < phi2

   1. Initial program 40.7%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 96.6%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 84.6%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) + -0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 84.6%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   6. Simplified 84.6%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) + \left(-0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   7. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf 75.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot R\right) + R \cdot \phi_2} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 75.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \phi_2 + -1 \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot R\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 75.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R} + -1 \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot R\right) \]

      3. associate-*r* 75.4%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot R + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot R} \]

      4. distribute-rgt-out 77.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \left(\phi_2 + -1 \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]

      5. mul-1-neg 77.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \color{blue}{\left(-\phi_1\right)}\right) \]

      6. sub-neg 77.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)} \]

   9. Simplified 77.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 78.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq 3.1 \cdot 10^{+72}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 79.6% accurate, 1.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq 4.5 \cdot 10^{-22}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi2 4.5e-22)
   (* R (hypot phi1 (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (* 0.5 phi1)))))
   (* R (hypot phi2 (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (* 0.5 phi2)))))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 4.5e-22) {
		tmp = R * hypot(phi1, ((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((0.5 * phi1))));
	} else {
		tmp = R * hypot(phi2, ((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((0.5 * phi2))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 4.5e-22) {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot(phi1, ((lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos((0.5 * phi1))));
	} else {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot(phi2, ((lambda1 - lambda2) * Math.cos((0.5 * phi2))));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi2 <= 4.5e-22:
		tmp = R * math.hypot(phi1, ((lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos((0.5 * phi1))))
	else:
		tmp = R * math.hypot(phi2, ((lambda1 - lambda2) * math.cos((0.5 * phi2))))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi2 <= 4.5e-22)
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(phi1, Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(0.5 * phi1)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(phi2, Float64(Float64(lambda1 - lambda2) * cos(Float64(0.5 * phi2)))));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi2 <= 4.5e-22)
		tmp = R * hypot(phi1, ((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((0.5 * phi1))));
	else
		tmp = R * hypot(phi2, ((lambda1 - lambda2) * cos((0.5 * phi2))));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi2, 4.5e-22], N[(R * N[Sqrt[phi1 ^ 2 + N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi1), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * N[Sqrt[phi2 ^ 2 + N[(N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] * N[Cos[N[(0.5 * phi2), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if phi2 < 4.49999999999999987e-22

   1. Initial program 60.3%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 97.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 53.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}^{2} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2} + {\phi_1}^{2}} \cdot R} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 53.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \sqrt{{\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}^{2} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2} + {\phi_1}^{2}}} \]

      2. +-commutative 53.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{{\phi_1}^{2} + {\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}^{2} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}}} \]

      3. unpow2 53.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1} + {\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)}^{2} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}} \]

      4. unpow2 53.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1 + \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}} \]

      5. unpow2 53.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1 + \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right)}} \]

      6. unswap-sqr 53.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1 + \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right) \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right)}} \]

      7. hypot-def 79.9%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 79.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right)} \]

   if 4.49999999999999987e-22 < phi2

   1. Initial program 46.2%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 96.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 43.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{{\phi_2}^{2} + {\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}^{2} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}} \cdot R} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 43.1%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \sqrt{{\phi_2}^{2} + {\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}^{2} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}}} \]

      2. unpow2 43.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot \phi_2} + {\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}^{2} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}} \]

      3. unpow2 43.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_2 \cdot \phi_2 + \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right)} \cdot {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}} \]

      4. unpow2 43.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_2 \cdot \phi_2 + \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right)}} \]

      5. unswap-sqr 43.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_2 \cdot \phi_2 + \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right) \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right)}} \]

      6. hypot-def 82.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right)} \]

   6. Simplified 82.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 80.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq 4.5 \cdot 10^{-22}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_2, \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6: 70.8% accurate, 3.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq 6.2 \cdot 10^{+72}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi2 6.2e+72)
   (* R (hypot phi1 (- lambda1 lambda2)))
   (* R (- phi2 phi1))))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 6.2e+72) {
		tmp = R * hypot(phi1, (lambda1 - lambda2));
	} else {
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 6.2e+72) {
		tmp = R * Math.hypot(phi1, (lambda1 - lambda2));
	} else {
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi2 <= 6.2e+72:
		tmp = R * math.hypot(phi1, (lambda1 - lambda2))
	else:
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi2 <= 6.2e+72)
		tmp = Float64(R * hypot(phi1, Float64(lambda1 - lambda2)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * Float64(phi2 - phi1));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi2 <= 6.2e+72)
		tmp = R * hypot(phi1, (lambda1 - lambda2));
	else
		tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi2, 6.2e+72], N[(R * N[Sqrt[phi1 ^ 2 + N[(lambda1 - lambda2), $MachinePrecision] ^ 2], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * N[(phi2 - phi1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if phi2 < 6.19999999999999977e72

   1. Initial program 60.2%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 97.1%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 82.0%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) + -0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 82.0%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   6. Simplified 82.0%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) + \left(-0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   7. Taylor expanded in phi2 around 0 51.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt{{\phi_1}^{2} + {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}} \cdot R} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 51.2%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \sqrt{{\phi_1}^{2} + {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}}} \]

      2. unpow2 51.2%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\color{blue}{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1} + {\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}^{2}} \]

      3. unpow2 51.2%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \sqrt{\phi_1 \cdot \phi_1 + \color{blue}{\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)}} \]

      4. hypot-def 71.7%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]

   9. Simplified 71.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)} \]

   if 6.19999999999999977e72 < phi2

   1. Initial program 40.7%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 96.6%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 84.6%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) + -0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 84.6%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   6. Simplified 84.6%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) + \left(-0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

   7. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf 75.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot R\right) + R \cdot \phi_2} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 75.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \phi_2 + -1 \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot R\right)} \]

      2. *-commutative 75.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R} + -1 \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot R\right) \]

      3. associate-*r* 75.4%

         \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot R + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot R} \]

      4. distribute-rgt-out 77.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \left(\phi_2 + -1 \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]

      5. mul-1-neg 77.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \color{blue}{\left(-\phi_1\right)}\right) \]

      6. sub-neg 77.5%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)} \]

   9. Simplified 77.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 72.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq 6.2 \cdot 10^{+72}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\phi_1, \lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 7: 27.9% accurate, 54.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq 4.2 \cdot 10^{+57}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(-\phi_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \phi_2\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= phi2 4.2e+57) (* R (- phi1)) (* R phi2)))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 4.2e+57) {
		tmp = R * -phi1;
	} else {
		tmp = R * phi2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (phi2 <= 4.2d+57) then
        tmp = r * -phi1
    else
        tmp = r * phi2
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	double tmp;
	if (phi2 <= 4.2e+57) {
		tmp = R * -phi1;
	} else {
		tmp = R * phi2;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	tmp = 0
	if phi2 <= 4.2e+57:
		tmp = R * -phi1
	else:
		tmp = R * phi2
	return tmp

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (phi2 <= 4.2e+57)
		tmp = Float64(R * Float64(-phi1));
	else
		tmp = Float64(R * phi2);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (phi2 <= 4.2e+57)
		tmp = R * -phi1;
	else
		tmp = R * phi2;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := If[LessEqual[phi2, 4.2e+57], N[(R * (-phi1)), $MachinePrecision], N[(R * phi2), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if phi2 < 4.19999999999999982e57

   1. Initial program 60.3%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 97.0%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 97.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi1 around -inf 17.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot R\right)} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 17.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot R} \]

      2. mul-1-neg 17.6%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\phi_1\right)} \cdot R \]

   6. Simplified 17.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\phi_1\right) \cdot R} \]

   if 4.19999999999999982e57 < phi2

   1. Initial program 41.5%

      \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. hypot-def 96.8%

         \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   3. Simplified 96.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf 66.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \phi_2} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 66.4%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R} \]

   6. Simplified 66.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 27.5%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\phi_2 \leq 4.2 \cdot 10^{+57}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \left(-\phi_1\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;R \cdot \phi_2\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 8: 29.2% accurate, 65.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ R \cdot \left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2) :precision binary64 (* R (- phi2 phi1)))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * (phi2 - phi1);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    code = r * (phi2 - phi1)
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * (phi2 - phi1);
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	return R * (phi2 - phi1)

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(R * Float64(phi2 - phi1))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = R * (phi2 - phi1);
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(R * N[(phi2 - phi1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 56.5%

   \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. hypot-def 97.0%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

3. Simplified 97.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in phi1 around 0 82.5%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) + -0.5 \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-*r* 82.5%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

6. Simplified 82.5%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\cos \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right) + \left(-0.5 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot \sin \left(0.5 \cdot \phi_2\right)\right)}, \phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \]

7. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf 26.4%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot R\right) + R \cdot \phi_2} \]
8. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 26.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \phi_2 + -1 \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot R\right)} \]

   2. *-commutative 26.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R} + -1 \cdot \left(\phi_1 \cdot R\right) \]

   3. associate-*r* 26.4%

      \[\leadsto \phi_2 \cdot R + \color{blue}{\left(-1 \cdot \phi_1\right) \cdot R} \]

   4. distribute-rgt-out 27.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \left(\phi_2 + -1 \cdot \phi_1\right)} \]

   5. mul-1-neg 27.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\phi_2 + \color{blue}{\left(-\phi_1\right)}\right) \]

   6. sub-neg 27.9%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)} \]

9. Simplified 27.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right)} \]

10. Final simplification 27.9%

    \[\leadsto R \cdot \left(\phi_2 - \phi_1\right) \]

Alternative 9: 17.1% accurate, 109.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ R \cdot \phi_2 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2) :precision binary64 (* R phi2))

C

double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * phi2;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(r, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
    real(8), intent (in) :: r
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda1
    real(8), intent (in) :: lambda2
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi1
    real(8), intent (in) :: phi2
    code = r * phi2
end function

Java

public static double code(double R, double lambda1, double lambda2, double phi1, double phi2) {
	return R * phi2;
}

Python

def code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2):
	return R * phi2

Julia

function code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	return Float64(R * phi2)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(R, lambda1, lambda2, phi1, phi2)
	tmp = R * phi2;
end

Wolfram

code[R_, lambda1_, lambda2_, phi1_, phi2_] := N[(R * phi2), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 56.5%

   \[R \cdot \sqrt{\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) \cdot \left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right)\right) + \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right) \cdot \left(\phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. hypot-def 97.0%

      \[\leadsto R \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

3. Simplified 97.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \mathsf{hypot}\left(\left(\lambda_1 - \lambda_2\right) \cdot \cos \left(\frac{\phi_1 + \phi_2}{2}\right), \phi_1 - \phi_2\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in phi2 around inf 16.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{R \cdot \phi_2} \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. *-commutative 16.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R} \]

6. Simplified 16.5%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\phi_2 \cdot R} \]

7. Final simplification 16.5%

   \[\leadsto R \cdot \phi_2 \]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023275 
(FPCore (R lambda1 lambda2 phi1 phi2)
  :name "Equirectangular approximation to distance on a great circle"
  :precision binary64
  (* R (sqrt (+ (* (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi1 phi2) 2.0))) (* (- lambda1 lambda2) (cos (/ (+ phi1 phi2) 2.0)))) (* (- phi1 phi2) (- phi1 phi2))))))