2-ancestry mixing, zero discriminant

Percentage Accurate: 76.9% → 98.7%

Time: 7.2s

Alternatives: 7

Speedup: 1.0×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \sqrt[3]{\frac{g}{2 \cdot a}} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (g a) :precision binary64 (cbrt (/ g (* 2.0 a))))

C

double code(double g, double a) {
	return cbrt((g / (2.0 * a)));
}

Java

public static double code(double g, double a) {
	return Math.cbrt((g / (2.0 * a)));
}

Julia

function code(g, a)
	return cbrt(Float64(g / Float64(2.0 * a)))
end

Wolfram

code[g_, a_] := N[Power[N[(g / N[(2.0 * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 1/3], $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 76.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \sqrt[3]{\frac{g}{2 \cdot a}} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (g a) :precision binary64 (cbrt (/ g (* 2.0 a))))

C

double code(double g, double a) {
	return cbrt((g / (2.0 * a)));
}

Java

public static double code(double g, double a) {
	return Math.cbrt((g / (2.0 * a)));
}

Julia

function code(g, a)
	return cbrt(Float64(g / Float64(2.0 * a)))
end

Wolfram

code[g_, a_] := N[Power[N[(g / N[(2.0 * a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 1/3], $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.7% accurate, 0.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \sqrt[3]{g} \cdot \sqrt[3]{\frac{0.5}{a}} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (g a) :precision binary64 (* (cbrt g) (cbrt (/ 0.5 a))))

C

double code(double g, double a) {
	return cbrt(g) * cbrt((0.5 / a));
}

Java

public static double code(double g, double a) {
	return Math.cbrt(g) * Math.cbrt((0.5 / a));
}

Julia

function code(g, a)
	return Float64(cbrt(g) * cbrt(Float64(0.5 / a)))
end

Wolfram

code[g_, a_] := N[(N[Power[g, 1/3], $MachinePrecision] * N[Power[N[(0.5 / a), $MachinePrecision], 1/3], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 74.8%

   \[\sqrt[3]{\frac{g}{2 \cdot a}} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. div-inv 74.7%

      \[\leadsto \sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{g \cdot \frac{1}{2 \cdot a}}} \]

   2. cbrt-prod 98.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt[3]{g} \cdot \sqrt[3]{\frac{1}{2 \cdot a}}} \]

   3. associate-/r* 98.8%

      \[\leadsto \sqrt[3]{g} \cdot \sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{\frac{\frac{1}{2}}{a}}} \]

   4. metadata-eval 98.8%

      \[\leadsto \sqrt[3]{g} \cdot \sqrt[3]{\frac{\color{blue}{0.5}}{a}} \]

3. Applied egg-rr 98.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt[3]{g} \cdot \sqrt[3]{\frac{0.5}{a}}} \]

4. Final simplification 98.8%

   \[\leadsto \sqrt[3]{g} \cdot \sqrt[3]{\frac{0.5}{a}} \]

Alternative 2: 76.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \frac{1}{\sqrt[3]{2 \cdot \frac{a}{g}}} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (g a) :precision binary64 (/ 1.0 (cbrt (* 2.0 (/ a g)))))

C

double code(double g, double a) {
	return 1.0 / cbrt((2.0 * (a / g)));
}

Java

public static double code(double g, double a) {
	return 1.0 / Math.cbrt((2.0 * (a / g)));
}

Julia

function code(g, a)
	return Float64(1.0 / cbrt(Float64(2.0 * Float64(a / g))))
end

Wolfram

code[g_, a_] := N[(1.0 / N[Power[N[(2.0 * N[(a / g), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 1/3], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 74.8%

   \[\sqrt[3]{\frac{g}{2 \cdot a}} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. clear-num 74.4%

      \[\leadsto \sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{2 \cdot a}{g}}}} \]

   2. cbrt-div 74.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\sqrt[3]{1}}{\sqrt[3]{\frac{2 \cdot a}{g}}}} \]

   3. metadata-eval 74.9%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1}}{\sqrt[3]{\frac{2 \cdot a}{g}}} \]

   4. *-un-lft-identity 74.9%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\sqrt[3]{\frac{2 \cdot a}{\color{blue}{1 \cdot g}}}} \]

   5. times-frac 74.9%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{\frac{2}{1} \cdot \frac{a}{g}}}} \]

   6. metadata-eval 74.9%

      \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{2} \cdot \frac{a}{g}}} \]

3. Applied egg-rr 74.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\sqrt[3]{2 \cdot \frac{a}{g}}}} \]

4. Final simplification 74.9%

   \[\leadsto \frac{1}{\sqrt[3]{2 \cdot \frac{a}{g}}} \]

Alternative 3: 5.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \sqrt[3]{g \cdot \left(a + a\right)} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (g a) :precision binary64 (cbrt (* g (+ a a))))

C

double code(double g, double a) {
	return cbrt((g * (a + a)));
}

Java

public static double code(double g, double a) {
	return Math.cbrt((g * (a + a)));
}

Julia

function code(g, a)
	return cbrt(Float64(g * Float64(a + a)))
end

Wolfram

code[g_, a_] := N[Power[N[(g * N[(a + a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 1/3], $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 74.8%

   \[\sqrt[3]{\frac{g}{2 \cdot a}} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-/r* 74.8%

      \[\leadsto \sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{\frac{\frac{g}{2}}{a}}} \]

   2. cbrt-div 98.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\sqrt[3]{\frac{g}{2}}}{\sqrt[3]{a}}} \]

   3. div-inv 98.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{g \cdot \frac{1}{2}}}}{\sqrt[3]{a}} \]

   4. metadata-eval 98.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\sqrt[3]{g \cdot \color{blue}{0.5}}}{\sqrt[3]{a}} \]

3. Applied egg-rr 98.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\sqrt[3]{g \cdot 0.5}}{\sqrt[3]{a}}} \]

5. Applied egg-rr 5.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt[3]{\left(a + a\right) \cdot g}} \]

6. Final simplification 5.8%

   \[\leadsto \sqrt[3]{g \cdot \left(a + a\right)} \]

Alternative 4: 76.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \sqrt[3]{g \cdot \frac{0.5}{a}} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (g a) :precision binary64 (cbrt (* g (/ 0.5 a))))

C

double code(double g, double a) {
	return cbrt((g * (0.5 / a)));
}

Java

public static double code(double g, double a) {
	return Math.cbrt((g * (0.5 / a)));
}

Julia

function code(g, a)
	return cbrt(Float64(g * Float64(0.5 / a)))
end

Wolfram

code[g_, a_] := N[Power[N[(g * N[(0.5 / a), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 1/3], $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 74.8%

   \[\sqrt[3]{\frac{g}{2 \cdot a}} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. expm1-log1p-u 54.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{g}{2 \cdot a}}\right)\right)} \]

   2. expm1-udef 22.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{e^{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\sqrt[3]{\frac{g}{2 \cdot a}}\right)} - 1} \]

   3. log1p-udef 22.0%

      \[\leadsto e^{\color{blue}{\log \left(1 + \sqrt[3]{\frac{g}{2 \cdot a}}\right)}} - 1 \]

   4. add-exp-log 42.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + \sqrt[3]{\frac{g}{2 \cdot a}}\right)} - 1 \]

   5. *-un-lft-identity 42.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 + \sqrt[3]{\frac{\color{blue}{1 \cdot g}}{2 \cdot a}}\right) - 1 \]

   6. times-frac 42.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 + \sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{2} \cdot \frac{g}{a}}}\right) - 1 \]

   7. metadata-eval 42.2%

      \[\leadsto \left(1 + \sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{0.5} \cdot \frac{g}{a}}\right) - 1 \]

3. Applied egg-rr 42.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(1 + \sqrt[3]{0.5 \cdot \frac{g}{a}}\right) - 1} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 42.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(\sqrt[3]{0.5 \cdot \frac{g}{a}} + 1\right)} - 1 \]

   2. associate--l+ 74.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt[3]{0.5 \cdot \frac{g}{a}} + \left(1 - 1\right)} \]

   3. metadata-eval 74.8%

      \[\leadsto \sqrt[3]{0.5 \cdot \frac{g}{a}} + \color{blue}{0} \]

   4. +-rgt-identity 74.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt[3]{0.5 \cdot \frac{g}{a}}} \]

   5. associate-*r/ 74.8%

      \[\leadsto \sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{\frac{0.5 \cdot g}{a}}} \]

   6. associate-*l/ 74.7%

      \[\leadsto \sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{\frac{0.5}{a} \cdot g}} \]

5. Simplified 74.7%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt[3]{\frac{0.5}{a} \cdot g}} \]

6. Final simplification 74.7%

   \[\leadsto \sqrt[3]{g \cdot \frac{0.5}{a}} \]

Alternative 5: 76.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \sqrt[3]{\frac{g}{a \cdot 2}} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (g a) :precision binary64 (cbrt (/ g (* a 2.0))))

C

double code(double g, double a) {
	return cbrt((g / (a * 2.0)));
}

Java

public static double code(double g, double a) {
	return Math.cbrt((g / (a * 2.0)));
}

Julia

function code(g, a)
	return cbrt(Float64(g / Float64(a * 2.0)))
end

Wolfram

code[g_, a_] := N[Power[N[(g / N[(a * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], 1/3], $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 74.8%

   \[\sqrt[3]{\frac{g}{2 \cdot a}} \]

2. Final simplification 74.8%

   \[\leadsto \sqrt[3]{\frac{g}{a \cdot 2}} \]

Alternative 6: 4.7% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \sqrt[3]{g} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (g a) :precision binary64 (cbrt g))

C

double code(double g, double a) {
	return cbrt(g);
}

Java

public static double code(double g, double a) {
	return Math.cbrt(g);
}

Julia

function code(g, a)
	return cbrt(g)
end

Wolfram

code[g_, a_] := N[Power[g, 1/3], $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 74.8%

   \[\sqrt[3]{\frac{g}{2 \cdot a}} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-/r* 74.8%

      \[\leadsto \sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{\frac{\frac{g}{2}}{a}}} \]

   2. cbrt-div 98.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\sqrt[3]{\frac{g}{2}}}{\sqrt[3]{a}}} \]

   3. div-inv 98.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{g \cdot \frac{1}{2}}}}{\sqrt[3]{a}} \]

   4. metadata-eval 98.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\sqrt[3]{g \cdot \color{blue}{0.5}}}{\sqrt[3]{a}} \]

3. Applied egg-rr 98.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\sqrt[3]{g \cdot 0.5}}{\sqrt[3]{a}}} \]

5. Applied egg-rr 6.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{1}{-\frac{a + a}{\sqrt[3]{g}}}} \]

7. Simplified 4.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt[3]{g}} \]

8. Final simplification 4.8%

   \[\leadsto \sqrt[3]{g} \]

Alternative 7: 3.2% accurate, 105.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 0 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (g a) :precision binary64 0.0)

C

double code(double g, double a) {
	return 0.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(g, a)
    real(8), intent (in) :: g
    real(8), intent (in) :: a
    code = 0.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double g, double a) {
	return 0.0;
}

Python

def code(g, a):
	return 0.0

Julia

function code(g, a)
	return 0.0
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(g, a)
	tmp = 0.0;
end

Wolfram

code[g_, a_] := 0.0

Derivation

1. Initial program 74.8%

   \[\sqrt[3]{\frac{g}{2 \cdot a}} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-/r* 74.8%

      \[\leadsto \sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{\frac{\frac{g}{2}}{a}}} \]

   2. cbrt-div 98.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\sqrt[3]{\frac{g}{2}}}{\sqrt[3]{a}}} \]

   3. div-inv 98.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\sqrt[3]{\color{blue}{g \cdot \frac{1}{2}}}}{\sqrt[3]{a}} \]

   4. metadata-eval 98.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\sqrt[3]{g \cdot \color{blue}{0.5}}}{\sqrt[3]{a}} \]

3. Applied egg-rr 98.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\sqrt[3]{g \cdot 0.5}}{\sqrt[3]{a}}} \]

5. Applied egg-rr 5.8%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\sqrt[3]{g \cdot \left(a + a\right)}} \]

7. Simplified 3.3%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{0} \]

8. Final simplification 3.3%

   \[\leadsto 0 \]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023274 
(FPCore (g a)
  :name "2-ancestry mixing, zero discriminant"
  :precision binary64
  (cbrt (/ g (* 2.0 a))))