Octave 3.8, jcobi/2

Percentage Accurate: 63.0% → 97.6%

Time: 19.8s

Alternatives: 8

Speedup: 9.5×

Specification

\[\left(\alpha > -1 \land \beta > -1\right) \land i > 0\]

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\\ \frac{\frac{\frac{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) \cdot \left(\beta - \alpha\right)}{t_0}}{t_0 + 2} + 1}{2} \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (alpha beta i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (+ (+ alpha beta) (* 2.0 i))))
   (/ (+ (/ (/ (* (+ alpha beta) (- beta alpha)) t_0) (+ t_0 2.0)) 1.0) 2.0)))

C

double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	double t_0 = (alpha + beta) + (2.0 * i);
	return (((((alpha + beta) * (beta - alpha)) / t_0) / (t_0 + 2.0)) + 1.0) / 2.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(alpha, beta, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: alpha
    real(8), intent (in) :: beta
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: t_0
    t_0 = (alpha + beta) + (2.0d0 * i)
    code = (((((alpha + beta) * (beta - alpha)) / t_0) / (t_0 + 2.0d0)) + 1.0d0) / 2.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	double t_0 = (alpha + beta) + (2.0 * i);
	return (((((alpha + beta) * (beta - alpha)) / t_0) / (t_0 + 2.0)) + 1.0) / 2.0;
}

Python

def code(alpha, beta, i):
	t_0 = (alpha + beta) + (2.0 * i)
	return (((((alpha + beta) * (beta - alpha)) / t_0) / (t_0 + 2.0)) + 1.0) / 2.0

Julia

function code(alpha, beta, i)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(alpha + beta) + Float64(2.0 * i))
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(alpha + beta) * Float64(beta - alpha)) / t_0) / Float64(t_0 + 2.0)) + 1.0) / 2.0)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(alpha, beta, i)
	t_0 = (alpha + beta) + (2.0 * i);
	tmp = (((((alpha + beta) * (beta - alpha)) / t_0) / (t_0 + 2.0)) + 1.0) / 2.0;
end

Wolfram

code[alpha_, beta_, i_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(alpha + beta), $MachinePrecision] + N[(2.0 * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(alpha + beta), $MachinePrecision] * N[(beta - alpha), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / t$95$0), $MachinePrecision] / N[(t$95$0 + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]

Initial Program: 63.0% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\\ \frac{\frac{\frac{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) \cdot \left(\beta - \alpha\right)}{t_0}}{t_0 + 2} + 1}{2} \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (alpha beta i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (+ (+ alpha beta) (* 2.0 i))))
   (/ (+ (/ (/ (* (+ alpha beta) (- beta alpha)) t_0) (+ t_0 2.0)) 1.0) 2.0)))

C

double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	double t_0 = (alpha + beta) + (2.0 * i);
	return (((((alpha + beta) * (beta - alpha)) / t_0) / (t_0 + 2.0)) + 1.0) / 2.0;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(alpha, beta, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: alpha
    real(8), intent (in) :: beta
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: t_0
    t_0 = (alpha + beta) + (2.0d0 * i)
    code = (((((alpha + beta) * (beta - alpha)) / t_0) / (t_0 + 2.0d0)) + 1.0d0) / 2.0d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	double t_0 = (alpha + beta) + (2.0 * i);
	return (((((alpha + beta) * (beta - alpha)) / t_0) / (t_0 + 2.0)) + 1.0) / 2.0;
}

Python

def code(alpha, beta, i):
	t_0 = (alpha + beta) + (2.0 * i)
	return (((((alpha + beta) * (beta - alpha)) / t_0) / (t_0 + 2.0)) + 1.0) / 2.0

Julia

function code(alpha, beta, i)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(alpha + beta) + Float64(2.0 * i))
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(alpha + beta) * Float64(beta - alpha)) / t_0) / Float64(t_0 + 2.0)) + 1.0) / 2.0)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(alpha, beta, i)
	t_0 = (alpha + beta) + (2.0 * i);
	tmp = (((((alpha + beta) * (beta - alpha)) / t_0) / (t_0 + 2.0)) + 1.0) / 2.0;
end

Wolfram

code[alpha_, beta_, i_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(alpha + beta), $MachinePrecision] + N[(2.0 * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(alpha + beta), $MachinePrecision] * N[(beta - alpha), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / t$95$0), $MachinePrecision] / N[(t$95$0 + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + 1.0), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]

Alternative 1: 97.6% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\\ \mathbf{if}\;\frac{\frac{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) \cdot \left(\beta - \alpha\right)}{t_0}}{2 + t_0} \leq -0.9995:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2 \cdot \frac{\beta}{\alpha} + \left(4 \cdot \frac{i}{\alpha} + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{\alpha}\right)}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 + \frac{\alpha + \beta}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + \mathsf{fma}\left(2, i, 2\right)} \cdot \frac{\beta - \alpha}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, i, \alpha + \beta\right)}}{2}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (alpha beta i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (+ (+ alpha beta) (* 2.0 i))))
   (if (<= (/ (/ (* (+ alpha beta) (- beta alpha)) t_0) (+ 2.0 t_0)) -0.9995)
     (/
      (+ (* 2.0 (/ beta alpha)) (+ (* 4.0 (/ i alpha)) (* 2.0 (/ 1.0 alpha))))
      2.0)
     (/
      (+
       1.0
       (*
        (/ (+ alpha beta) (+ (+ alpha beta) (fma 2.0 i 2.0)))
        (/ (- beta alpha) (fma 2.0 i (+ alpha beta)))))
      2.0))))

C

double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	double t_0 = (alpha + beta) + (2.0 * i);
	double tmp;
	if (((((alpha + beta) * (beta - alpha)) / t_0) / (2.0 + t_0)) <= -0.9995) {
		tmp = ((2.0 * (beta / alpha)) + ((4.0 * (i / alpha)) + (2.0 * (1.0 / alpha)))) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = (1.0 + (((alpha + beta) / ((alpha + beta) + fma(2.0, i, 2.0))) * ((beta - alpha) / fma(2.0, i, (alpha + beta))))) / 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Julia

function code(alpha, beta, i)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(alpha + beta) + Float64(2.0 * i))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(alpha + beta) * Float64(beta - alpha)) / t_0) / Float64(2.0 + t_0)) <= -0.9995)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(2.0 * Float64(beta / alpha)) + Float64(Float64(4.0 * Float64(i / alpha)) + Float64(2.0 * Float64(1.0 / alpha)))) / 2.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 + Float64(Float64(Float64(alpha + beta) / Float64(Float64(alpha + beta) + fma(2.0, i, 2.0))) * Float64(Float64(beta - alpha) / fma(2.0, i, Float64(alpha + beta))))) / 2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[alpha_, beta_, i_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(alpha + beta), $MachinePrecision] + N[(2.0 * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(N[(N[(N[(alpha + beta), $MachinePrecision] * N[(beta - alpha), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / t$95$0), $MachinePrecision] / N[(2.0 + t$95$0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], -0.9995], N[(N[(N[(2.0 * N[(beta / alpha), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(4.0 * N[(i / alpha), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(2.0 * N[(1.0 / alpha), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(1.0 + N[(N[(N[(alpha + beta), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[(alpha + beta), $MachinePrecision] + N[(2.0 * i + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(beta - alpha), $MachinePrecision] / N[(2.0 * i + N[(alpha + beta), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (/.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 alpha beta) (-.f64 beta alpha)) (+.f64 (+.f64 alpha beta) (*.f64 2 i))) (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 alpha beta) (*.f64 2 i)) 2)) < -0.99950000000000006

   1. Initial program 2.6%

      \[\frac{\frac{\frac{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) \cdot \left(\beta - \alpha\right)}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i}}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

   3. Simplified 16.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\alpha + \beta}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + \mathsf{fma}\left(2, i, 2\right)} \cdot \frac{\beta - \alpha}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, i, \alpha + \beta\right)} + 1}{2}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in alpha around inf 89.9%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{\left(-1 \cdot \beta + \beta\right) - -1 \cdot \left(4 \cdot i + \left(2 + 2 \cdot \beta\right)\right)}{\alpha}}}{2} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in beta around 0 89.9%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{2 \cdot \frac{\beta}{\alpha} + \left(4 \cdot \frac{i}{\alpha} + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{\alpha}\right)}}{2} \]

   if -0.99950000000000006 < (/.f64 (/.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 alpha beta) (-.f64 beta alpha)) (+.f64 (+.f64 alpha beta) (*.f64 2 i))) (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 alpha beta) (*.f64 2 i)) 2))

   1. Initial program 74.7%

      \[\frac{\frac{\frac{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) \cdot \left(\beta - \alpha\right)}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i}}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\alpha + \beta}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + \mathsf{fma}\left(2, i, 2\right)} \cdot \frac{\beta - \alpha}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, i, \alpha + \beta\right)} + 1}{2}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 97.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{\frac{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) \cdot \left(\beta - \alpha\right)}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i}}{2 + \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right)} \leq -0.9995:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2 \cdot \frac{\beta}{\alpha} + \left(4 \cdot \frac{i}{\alpha} + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{\alpha}\right)}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 + \frac{\alpha + \beta}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + \mathsf{fma}\left(2, i, 2\right)} \cdot \frac{\beta - \alpha}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, i, \alpha + \beta\right)}}{2}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 2: 96.1% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\\ t_1 := 2 + t_0\\ \mathbf{if}\;\frac{\frac{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) \cdot \left(\beta - \alpha\right)}{t_0}}{t_1} \leq -0.5:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2 \cdot \frac{\beta}{\alpha} + \left(4 \cdot \frac{i}{\alpha} + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{\alpha}\right)}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 + \frac{\beta}{t_1}}{2}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (alpha beta i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (+ (+ alpha beta) (* 2.0 i))) (t_1 (+ 2.0 t_0)))
   (if (<= (/ (/ (* (+ alpha beta) (- beta alpha)) t_0) t_1) -0.5)
     (/
      (+ (* 2.0 (/ beta alpha)) (+ (* 4.0 (/ i alpha)) (* 2.0 (/ 1.0 alpha))))
      2.0)
     (/ (+ 1.0 (/ beta t_1)) 2.0))))

C

double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	double t_0 = (alpha + beta) + (2.0 * i);
	double t_1 = 2.0 + t_0;
	double tmp;
	if (((((alpha + beta) * (beta - alpha)) / t_0) / t_1) <= -0.5) {
		tmp = ((2.0 * (beta / alpha)) + ((4.0 * (i / alpha)) + (2.0 * (1.0 / alpha)))) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = (1.0 + (beta / t_1)) / 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(alpha, beta, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: alpha
    real(8), intent (in) :: beta
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = (alpha + beta) + (2.0d0 * i)
    t_1 = 2.0d0 + t_0
    if (((((alpha + beta) * (beta - alpha)) / t_0) / t_1) <= (-0.5d0)) then
        tmp = ((2.0d0 * (beta / alpha)) + ((4.0d0 * (i / alpha)) + (2.0d0 * (1.0d0 / alpha)))) / 2.0d0
    else
        tmp = (1.0d0 + (beta / t_1)) / 2.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	double t_0 = (alpha + beta) + (2.0 * i);
	double t_1 = 2.0 + t_0;
	double tmp;
	if (((((alpha + beta) * (beta - alpha)) / t_0) / t_1) <= -0.5) {
		tmp = ((2.0 * (beta / alpha)) + ((4.0 * (i / alpha)) + (2.0 * (1.0 / alpha)))) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = (1.0 + (beta / t_1)) / 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(alpha, beta, i):
	t_0 = (alpha + beta) + (2.0 * i)
	t_1 = 2.0 + t_0
	tmp = 0
	if ((((alpha + beta) * (beta - alpha)) / t_0) / t_1) <= -0.5:
		tmp = ((2.0 * (beta / alpha)) + ((4.0 * (i / alpha)) + (2.0 * (1.0 / alpha)))) / 2.0
	else:
		tmp = (1.0 + (beta / t_1)) / 2.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(alpha, beta, i)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(alpha + beta) + Float64(2.0 * i))
	t_1 = Float64(2.0 + t_0)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(alpha + beta) * Float64(beta - alpha)) / t_0) / t_1) <= -0.5)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(2.0 * Float64(beta / alpha)) + Float64(Float64(4.0 * Float64(i / alpha)) + Float64(2.0 * Float64(1.0 / alpha)))) / 2.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 + Float64(beta / t_1)) / 2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(alpha, beta, i)
	t_0 = (alpha + beta) + (2.0 * i);
	t_1 = 2.0 + t_0;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (((((alpha + beta) * (beta - alpha)) / t_0) / t_1) <= -0.5)
		tmp = ((2.0 * (beta / alpha)) + ((4.0 * (i / alpha)) + (2.0 * (1.0 / alpha)))) / 2.0;
	else
		tmp = (1.0 + (beta / t_1)) / 2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[alpha_, beta_, i_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(alpha + beta), $MachinePrecision] + N[(2.0 * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, Block[{t$95$1 = N[(2.0 + t$95$0), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[N[(N[(N[(N[(alpha + beta), $MachinePrecision] * N[(beta - alpha), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / t$95$0), $MachinePrecision] / t$95$1), $MachinePrecision], -0.5], N[(N[(N[(2.0 * N[(beta / alpha), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(4.0 * N[(i / alpha), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(2.0 * N[(1.0 / alpha), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(1.0 + N[(beta / t$95$1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if (/.f64 (/.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 alpha beta) (-.f64 beta alpha)) (+.f64 (+.f64 alpha beta) (*.f64 2 i))) (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 alpha beta) (*.f64 2 i)) 2)) < -0.5

   1. Initial program 5.4%

      \[\frac{\frac{\frac{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) \cdot \left(\beta - \alpha\right)}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i}}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

   3. Simplified 18.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\alpha + \beta}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + \mathsf{fma}\left(2, i, 2\right)} \cdot \frac{\beta - \alpha}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, i, \alpha + \beta\right)} + 1}{2}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in alpha around inf 88.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{\left(-1 \cdot \beta + \beta\right) - -1 \cdot \left(4 \cdot i + \left(2 + 2 \cdot \beta\right)\right)}{\alpha}}}{2} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in beta around 0 88.1%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{2 \cdot \frac{\beta}{\alpha} + \left(4 \cdot \frac{i}{\alpha} + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{\alpha}\right)}}{2} \]

   if -0.5 < (/.f64 (/.f64 (*.f64 (+.f64 alpha beta) (-.f64 beta alpha)) (+.f64 (+.f64 alpha beta) (*.f64 2 i))) (+.f64 (+.f64 (+.f64 alpha beta) (*.f64 2 i)) 2))

   1. Initial program 74.5%

      \[\frac{\frac{\frac{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) \cdot \left(\beta - \alpha\right)}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i}}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in beta around inf 98.2%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{\beta}}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 95.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{\frac{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) \cdot \left(\beta - \alpha\right)}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i}}{2 + \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right)} \leq -0.5:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{2 \cdot \frac{\beta}{\alpha} + \left(4 \cdot \frac{i}{\alpha} + 2 \cdot \frac{1}{\alpha}\right)}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 + \frac{\beta}{2 + \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right)}}{2}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 79.5% accurate, 1.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{\frac{2 + i \cdot 4}{\alpha}}{2}\\ \mathbf{if}\;\alpha \leq 9.2 \cdot 10^{+78}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 + \frac{\beta}{\beta + 2}}{2}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\alpha \leq 2.2 \cdot 10^{+139}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\alpha \leq 2.1 \cdot 10^{+159}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\alpha \leq 1.15 \cdot 10^{+192}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{2 + \beta \cdot 2}{\alpha}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;t_0\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (alpha beta i)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (/ (/ (+ 2.0 (* i 4.0)) alpha) 2.0)))
   (if (<= alpha 9.2e+78)
     (/ (+ 1.0 (/ beta (+ beta 2.0))) 2.0)
     (if (<= alpha 2.2e+139)
       t_0
       (if (<= alpha 2.1e+159)
         0.5
         (if (<= alpha 1.15e+192)
           (/ (/ (+ 2.0 (* beta 2.0)) alpha) 2.0)
           t_0))))))

C

double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	double t_0 = ((2.0 + (i * 4.0)) / alpha) / 2.0;
	double tmp;
	if (alpha <= 9.2e+78) {
		tmp = (1.0 + (beta / (beta + 2.0))) / 2.0;
	} else if (alpha <= 2.2e+139) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (alpha <= 2.1e+159) {
		tmp = 0.5;
	} else if (alpha <= 1.15e+192) {
		tmp = ((2.0 + (beta * 2.0)) / alpha) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(alpha, beta, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: alpha
    real(8), intent (in) :: beta
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = ((2.0d0 + (i * 4.0d0)) / alpha) / 2.0d0
    if (alpha <= 9.2d+78) then
        tmp = (1.0d0 + (beta / (beta + 2.0d0))) / 2.0d0
    else if (alpha <= 2.2d+139) then
        tmp = t_0
    else if (alpha <= 2.1d+159) then
        tmp = 0.5d0
    else if (alpha <= 1.15d+192) then
        tmp = ((2.0d0 + (beta * 2.0d0)) / alpha) / 2.0d0
    else
        tmp = t_0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	double t_0 = ((2.0 + (i * 4.0)) / alpha) / 2.0;
	double tmp;
	if (alpha <= 9.2e+78) {
		tmp = (1.0 + (beta / (beta + 2.0))) / 2.0;
	} else if (alpha <= 2.2e+139) {
		tmp = t_0;
	} else if (alpha <= 2.1e+159) {
		tmp = 0.5;
	} else if (alpha <= 1.15e+192) {
		tmp = ((2.0 + (beta * 2.0)) / alpha) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = t_0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(alpha, beta, i):
	t_0 = ((2.0 + (i * 4.0)) / alpha) / 2.0
	tmp = 0
	if alpha <= 9.2e+78:
		tmp = (1.0 + (beta / (beta + 2.0))) / 2.0
	elif alpha <= 2.2e+139:
		tmp = t_0
	elif alpha <= 2.1e+159:
		tmp = 0.5
	elif alpha <= 1.15e+192:
		tmp = ((2.0 + (beta * 2.0)) / alpha) / 2.0
	else:
		tmp = t_0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(alpha, beta, i)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(Float64(2.0 + Float64(i * 4.0)) / alpha) / 2.0)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (alpha <= 9.2e+78)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 + Float64(beta / Float64(beta + 2.0))) / 2.0);
	elseif (alpha <= 2.2e+139)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (alpha <= 2.1e+159)
		tmp = 0.5;
	elseif (alpha <= 1.15e+192)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(2.0 + Float64(beta * 2.0)) / alpha) / 2.0);
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(alpha, beta, i)
	t_0 = ((2.0 + (i * 4.0)) / alpha) / 2.0;
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (alpha <= 9.2e+78)
		tmp = (1.0 + (beta / (beta + 2.0))) / 2.0;
	elseif (alpha <= 2.2e+139)
		tmp = t_0;
	elseif (alpha <= 2.1e+159)
		tmp = 0.5;
	elseif (alpha <= 1.15e+192)
		tmp = ((2.0 + (beta * 2.0)) / alpha) / 2.0;
	else
		tmp = t_0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[alpha_, beta_, i_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(N[(2.0 + N[(i * 4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / alpha), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[alpha, 9.2e+78], N[(N[(1.0 + N[(beta / N[(beta + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[alpha, 2.2e+139], t$95$0, If[LessEqual[alpha, 2.1e+159], 0.5, If[LessEqual[alpha, 1.15e+192], N[(N[(N[(2.0 + N[(beta * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / alpha), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision], t$95$0]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 4 regimes

2. if alpha < 9.2000000000000008e78

   1. Initial program 74.8%

      \[\frac{\frac{\frac{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) \cdot \left(\beta - \alpha\right)}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i}}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

   3. Simplified 96.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\alpha + \beta}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + \mathsf{fma}\left(2, i, 2\right)} \cdot \frac{\beta - \alpha}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, i, \alpha + \beta\right)} + 1}{2}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in i around 0 85.6%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\beta + \left(2 + \alpha\right)}} + 1}{2} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in alpha around 0 89.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{\beta}{\beta + 2}} + 1}{2} \]

   if 9.2000000000000008e78 < alpha < 2.1999999999999999e139 or 1.15e192 < alpha

   1. Initial program 12.5%

      \[\frac{\frac{\frac{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) \cdot \left(\beta - \alpha\right)}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i}}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

   3. Simplified 32.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\alpha + \beta}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + \mathsf{fma}\left(2, i, 2\right)} \cdot \frac{\beta - \alpha}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, i, \alpha + \beta\right)} + 1}{2}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in alpha around inf 74.3%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{\left(-1 \cdot \beta + \beta\right) - -1 \cdot \left(4 \cdot i + \left(2 + 2 \cdot \beta\right)\right)}{\alpha}}}{2} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in beta around 0 66.6%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{4 \cdot i + 2}{\alpha}}}{2} \]

   if 2.1999999999999999e139 < alpha < 2.09999999999999989e159

   1. Initial program 32.2%

      \[\frac{\frac{\frac{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) \cdot \left(\beta - \alpha\right)}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i}}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

   3. Simplified 71.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\alpha + \beta}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + \mathsf{fma}\left(2, i, 2\right)} \cdot \frac{\beta - \alpha}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, i, \alpha + \beta\right)} + 1}{2}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in i around inf 55.5%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1}}{2} \]

   if 2.09999999999999989e159 < alpha < 1.15e192

   1. Initial program 1.1%

      \[\frac{\frac{\frac{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) \cdot \left(\beta - \alpha\right)}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i}}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

   3. Simplified 24.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\alpha + \beta}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + \mathsf{fma}\left(2, i, 2\right)} \cdot \frac{\beta - \alpha}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, i, \alpha + \beta\right)} + 1}{2}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in i around 0 18.2%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\beta + \left(2 + \alpha\right)}} + 1}{2} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in alpha around inf 76.3%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{2 + 2 \cdot \beta}{\alpha}}}{2} \]
3. Recombined 4 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 82.6%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\alpha \leq 9.2 \cdot 10^{+78}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 + \frac{\beta}{\beta + 2}}{2}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\alpha \leq 2.2 \cdot 10^{+139}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{2 + i \cdot 4}{\alpha}}{2}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\alpha \leq 2.1 \cdot 10^{+159}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5\\ \mathbf{elif}\;\alpha \leq 1.15 \cdot 10^{+192}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{2 + \beta \cdot 2}{\alpha}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{2 + i \cdot 4}{\alpha}}{2}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 85.4% accurate, 1.7× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\alpha \leq 1.12 \cdot 10^{+166}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 + \frac{\beta}{2 + \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right)}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{2 + i \cdot 4}{\alpha}}{2}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (alpha beta i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= alpha 1.12e+166)
   (/ (+ 1.0 (/ beta (+ 2.0 (+ (+ alpha beta) (* 2.0 i))))) 2.0)
   (/ (/ (+ 2.0 (* i 4.0)) alpha) 2.0)))

C

double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (alpha <= 1.12e+166) {
		tmp = (1.0 + (beta / (2.0 + ((alpha + beta) + (2.0 * i))))) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = ((2.0 + (i * 4.0)) / alpha) / 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(alpha, beta, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: alpha
    real(8), intent (in) :: beta
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (alpha <= 1.12d+166) then
        tmp = (1.0d0 + (beta / (2.0d0 + ((alpha + beta) + (2.0d0 * i))))) / 2.0d0
    else
        tmp = ((2.0d0 + (i * 4.0d0)) / alpha) / 2.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (alpha <= 1.12e+166) {
		tmp = (1.0 + (beta / (2.0 + ((alpha + beta) + (2.0 * i))))) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = ((2.0 + (i * 4.0)) / alpha) / 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(alpha, beta, i):
	tmp = 0
	if alpha <= 1.12e+166:
		tmp = (1.0 + (beta / (2.0 + ((alpha + beta) + (2.0 * i))))) / 2.0
	else:
		tmp = ((2.0 + (i * 4.0)) / alpha) / 2.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(alpha, beta, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (alpha <= 1.12e+166)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 + Float64(beta / Float64(2.0 + Float64(Float64(alpha + beta) + Float64(2.0 * i))))) / 2.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(2.0 + Float64(i * 4.0)) / alpha) / 2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(alpha, beta, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (alpha <= 1.12e+166)
		tmp = (1.0 + (beta / (2.0 + ((alpha + beta) + (2.0 * i))))) / 2.0;
	else
		tmp = ((2.0 + (i * 4.0)) / alpha) / 2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[alpha_, beta_, i_] := If[LessEqual[alpha, 1.12e+166], N[(N[(1.0 + N[(beta / N[(2.0 + N[(N[(alpha + beta), $MachinePrecision] + N[(2.0 * i), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(N[(2.0 + N[(i * 4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / alpha), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if alpha < 1.1199999999999999e166

   1. Initial program 67.2%

      \[\frac{\frac{\frac{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) \cdot \left(\beta - \alpha\right)}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i}}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]

   2. Taylor expanded in beta around inf 87.2%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\frac{\color{blue}{\beta}}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]

   if 1.1199999999999999e166 < alpha

   1. Initial program 1.3%

      \[\frac{\frac{\frac{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) \cdot \left(\beta - \alpha\right)}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i}}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

   3. Simplified 24.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\alpha + \beta}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + \mathsf{fma}\left(2, i, 2\right)} \cdot \frac{\beta - \alpha}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, i, \alpha + \beta\right)} + 1}{2}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in alpha around inf 82.2%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{\left(-1 \cdot \beta + \beta\right) - -1 \cdot \left(4 \cdot i + \left(2 + 2 \cdot \beta\right)\right)}{\alpha}}}{2} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in beta around 0 72.6%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{4 \cdot i + 2}{\alpha}}}{2} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 84.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\alpha \leq 1.12 \cdot 10^{+166}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 + \frac{\beta}{2 + \left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right)}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{2 + i \cdot 4}{\alpha}}{2}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 74.9% accurate, 2.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\alpha \leq 1.35 \cdot 10^{+166}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 + \frac{\beta}{\beta + 2}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{2}{\alpha}}{2}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (alpha beta i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= alpha 1.35e+166)
   (/ (+ 1.0 (/ beta (+ beta 2.0))) 2.0)
   (/ (/ 2.0 alpha) 2.0)))

C

double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (alpha <= 1.35e+166) {
		tmp = (1.0 + (beta / (beta + 2.0))) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = (2.0 / alpha) / 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(alpha, beta, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: alpha
    real(8), intent (in) :: beta
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (alpha <= 1.35d+166) then
        tmp = (1.0d0 + (beta / (beta + 2.0d0))) / 2.0d0
    else
        tmp = (2.0d0 / alpha) / 2.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (alpha <= 1.35e+166) {
		tmp = (1.0 + (beta / (beta + 2.0))) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = (2.0 / alpha) / 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(alpha, beta, i):
	tmp = 0
	if alpha <= 1.35e+166:
		tmp = (1.0 + (beta / (beta + 2.0))) / 2.0
	else:
		tmp = (2.0 / alpha) / 2.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(alpha, beta, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (alpha <= 1.35e+166)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 + Float64(beta / Float64(beta + 2.0))) / 2.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(2.0 / alpha) / 2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(alpha, beta, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (alpha <= 1.35e+166)
		tmp = (1.0 + (beta / (beta + 2.0))) / 2.0;
	else
		tmp = (2.0 / alpha) / 2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[alpha_, beta_, i_] := If[LessEqual[alpha, 1.35e+166], N[(N[(1.0 + N[(beta / N[(beta + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(2.0 / alpha), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if alpha < 1.35000000000000006e166

   1. Initial program 67.2%

      \[\frac{\frac{\frac{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) \cdot \left(\beta - \alpha\right)}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i}}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

   3. Simplified 89.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\alpha + \beta}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + \mathsf{fma}\left(2, i, 2\right)} \cdot \frac{\beta - \alpha}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, i, \alpha + \beta\right)} + 1}{2}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in i around 0 75.5%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\beta + \left(2 + \alpha\right)}} + 1}{2} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in alpha around 0 80.2%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{\beta}{\beta + 2}} + 1}{2} \]

   if 1.35000000000000006e166 < alpha

   1. Initial program 1.3%

      \[\frac{\frac{\frac{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) \cdot \left(\beta - \alpha\right)}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i}}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

   3. Simplified 24.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\alpha + \beta}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + \mathsf{fma}\left(2, i, 2\right)} \cdot \frac{\beta - \alpha}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, i, \alpha + \beta\right)} + 1}{2}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in i around 0 12.7%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\beta + \left(2 + \alpha\right)}} + 1}{2} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in beta around 0 5.6%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1 - \frac{\alpha}{2 + \alpha}}}{2} \]

   6. Taylor expanded in alpha around inf 50.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{2}{\alpha}}}{2} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 75.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\alpha \leq 1.35 \cdot 10^{+166}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 + \frac{\beta}{\beta + 2}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{2}{\alpha}}{2}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6: 77.8% accurate, 2.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\alpha \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{+79}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 + \frac{\beta}{\beta + 2}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{2 + \beta \cdot 2}{\alpha}}{2}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (alpha beta i)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= alpha 1.25e+79)
   (/ (+ 1.0 (/ beta (+ beta 2.0))) 2.0)
   (/ (/ (+ 2.0 (* beta 2.0)) alpha) 2.0)))

C

double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (alpha <= 1.25e+79) {
		tmp = (1.0 + (beta / (beta + 2.0))) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = ((2.0 + (beta * 2.0)) / alpha) / 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(alpha, beta, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: alpha
    real(8), intent (in) :: beta
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (alpha <= 1.25d+79) then
        tmp = (1.0d0 + (beta / (beta + 2.0d0))) / 2.0d0
    else
        tmp = ((2.0d0 + (beta * 2.0d0)) / alpha) / 2.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (alpha <= 1.25e+79) {
		tmp = (1.0 + (beta / (beta + 2.0))) / 2.0;
	} else {
		tmp = ((2.0 + (beta * 2.0)) / alpha) / 2.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(alpha, beta, i):
	tmp = 0
	if alpha <= 1.25e+79:
		tmp = (1.0 + (beta / (beta + 2.0))) / 2.0
	else:
		tmp = ((2.0 + (beta * 2.0)) / alpha) / 2.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(alpha, beta, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (alpha <= 1.25e+79)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 + Float64(beta / Float64(beta + 2.0))) / 2.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(Float64(2.0 + Float64(beta * 2.0)) / alpha) / 2.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(alpha, beta, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (alpha <= 1.25e+79)
		tmp = (1.0 + (beta / (beta + 2.0))) / 2.0;
	else
		tmp = ((2.0 + (beta * 2.0)) / alpha) / 2.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[alpha_, beta_, i_] := If[LessEqual[alpha, 1.25e+79], N[(N[(1.0 + N[(beta / N[(beta + 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(N[(2.0 + N[(beta * 2.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / alpha), $MachinePrecision] / 2.0), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if alpha < 1.25e79

   1. Initial program 74.8%

      \[\frac{\frac{\frac{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) \cdot \left(\beta - \alpha\right)}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i}}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

   3. Simplified 96.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\alpha + \beta}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + \mathsf{fma}\left(2, i, 2\right)} \cdot \frac{\beta - \alpha}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, i, \alpha + \beta\right)} + 1}{2}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in i around 0 85.6%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\beta + \left(2 + \alpha\right)}} + 1}{2} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in alpha around 0 89.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{\beta}{\beta + 2}} + 1}{2} \]

   if 1.25e79 < alpha

   1. Initial program 12.9%

      \[\frac{\frac{\frac{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) \cdot \left(\beta - \alpha\right)}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i}}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

   3. Simplified 36.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\alpha + \beta}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + \mathsf{fma}\left(2, i, 2\right)} \cdot \frac{\beta - \alpha}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, i, \alpha + \beta\right)} + 1}{2}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in i around 0 16.8%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{\beta - \alpha}{\beta + \left(2 + \alpha\right)}} + 1}{2} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in alpha around inf 54.5%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{2 + 2 \cdot \beta}{\alpha}}}{2} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 78.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\alpha \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{+79}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1 + \frac{\beta}{\beta + 2}}{2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\frac{2 + \beta \cdot 2}{\alpha}}{2}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 7: 72.5% accurate, 9.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\beta \leq 1.26 \cdot 10^{+45}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;1\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (alpha beta i) :precision binary64 (if (<= beta 1.26e+45) 0.5 1.0))

C

double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (beta <= 1.26e+45) {
		tmp = 0.5;
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(alpha, beta, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: alpha
    real(8), intent (in) :: beta
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (beta <= 1.26d+45) then
        tmp = 0.5d0
    else
        tmp = 1.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	double tmp;
	if (beta <= 1.26e+45) {
		tmp = 0.5;
	} else {
		tmp = 1.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(alpha, beta, i):
	tmp = 0
	if beta <= 1.26e+45:
		tmp = 0.5
	else:
		tmp = 1.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(alpha, beta, i)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (beta <= 1.26e+45)
		tmp = 0.5;
	else
		tmp = 1.0;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(alpha, beta, i)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (beta <= 1.26e+45)
		tmp = 0.5;
	else
		tmp = 1.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[alpha_, beta_, i_] := If[LessEqual[beta, 1.26e+45], 0.5, 1.0]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if beta < 1.26e45

   1. Initial program 70.3%

      \[\frac{\frac{\frac{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) \cdot \left(\beta - \alpha\right)}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i}}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

   3. Simplified 73.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\alpha + \beta}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + \mathsf{fma}\left(2, i, 2\right)} \cdot \frac{\beta - \alpha}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, i, \alpha + \beta\right)} + 1}{2}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in i around inf 69.9%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1}}{2} \]

   if 1.26e45 < beta

   1. Initial program 27.6%

      \[\frac{\frac{\frac{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) \cdot \left(\beta - \alpha\right)}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i}}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

   3. Simplified 91.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\alpha + \beta}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + \mathsf{fma}\left(2, i, 2\right)} \cdot \frac{\beta - \alpha}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, i, \alpha + \beta\right)} + 1}{2}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in beta around inf 77.0%

      \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{2}}{2} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 72.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\beta \leq 1.26 \cdot 10^{+45}:\\ \;\;\;\;0.5\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;1\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 8: 62.0% accurate, 29.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 0.5 \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (alpha beta i) :precision binary64 0.5)

C

double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	return 0.5;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(alpha, beta, i)
    real(8), intent (in) :: alpha
    real(8), intent (in) :: beta
    real(8), intent (in) :: i
    code = 0.5d0
end function

Java

public static double code(double alpha, double beta, double i) {
	return 0.5;
}

Python

def code(alpha, beta, i):
	return 0.5

Julia

function code(alpha, beta, i)
	return 0.5
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(alpha, beta, i)
	tmp = 0.5;
end

Wolfram

code[alpha_, beta_, i_] := 0.5

Derivation

1. Initial program 56.7%

   \[\frac{\frac{\frac{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) \cdot \left(\beta - \alpha\right)}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i}}{\left(\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + 2 \cdot i\right) + 2} + 1}{2} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

3. Simplified 79.0%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{\alpha + \beta}{\left(\alpha + \beta\right) + \mathsf{fma}\left(2, i, 2\right)} \cdot \frac{\beta - \alpha}{\mathsf{fma}\left(2, i, \alpha + \beta\right)} + 1}{2}} \]

4. Taylor expanded in i around inf 57.0%

   \[\leadsto \frac{\color{blue}{1}}{2} \]

5. Final simplification 57.0%

   \[\leadsto 0.5 \]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023274 
(FPCore (alpha beta i)
  :name "Octave 3.8, jcobi/2"
  :precision binary64
  :pre (and (and (> alpha -1.0) (> beta -1.0)) (> i 0.0))
  (/ (+ (/ (/ (* (+ alpha beta) (- beta alpha)) (+ (+ alpha beta) (* 2.0 i))) (+ (+ (+ alpha beta) (* 2.0 i)) 2.0)) 1.0) 2.0))