Graphics.Rendering.Plot.Render.Plot.Legend:renderLegendInside from plot-0.2.3.4

Percentage Accurate: 99.9% → 100.0%

Time: 6.5s

Alternatives: 9

Speedup: 1.2×

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (+ (+ (+ (+ x y) y) x) z) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ (+ (+ (+ (+ x y) y) x) z) x))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(Float64(x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x)
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = ((((x + y) + y) + x) + z) + x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(N[(N[(N[(N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision] + y), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision] + z), $MachinePrecision] + x), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 100.0% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, 2 \cdot y\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ z (fma x 3.0 (* 2.0 y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z + fma(x, 3.0, (2.0 * y));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(z + fma(x, 3.0, Float64(2.0 * y)))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(z + N[(x * 3.0 + N[(2.0 * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)} + x \]

   2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + x\right)} \]

   3. remove-double-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + x\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. distribute-neg-in 99.9%

      \[\leadsto z + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right) + \left(-x\right)\right)}\right) \]

   5. distribute-neg-in 99.9%

      \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-\left(-\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)\right) + \left(-\left(-x\right)\right)\right)} \]

   6. remove-double-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto z + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)} + \left(-\left(-x\right)\right)\right) \]

   7. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) - \left(-x\right)\right)} \]

   8. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(x + \left(y + y\right)\right)} + x\right) - \left(-x\right)\right) \]

   9. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(y + y\right) + x\right)} + x\right) - \left(-x\right)\right) \]

   10. associate-+r+ 99.9%

       \[\leadsto z + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(y + y\right) + \left(x + x\right)\right)} - \left(-x\right)\right) \]

   11. associate--l+ 99.9%

       \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(\left(y + y\right) + \left(\left(x + x\right) - \left(-x\right)\right)\right)} \]

   12. count-2 99.9%

       \[\leadsto z + \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot y} + \left(\left(x + x\right) - \left(-x\right)\right)\right) \]

   13. *-commutative 99.9%

       \[\leadsto z + \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot 2} + \left(\left(x + x\right) - \left(-x\right)\right)\right) \]

   14. fma-def 99.9%

       \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 2, \left(x + x\right) - \left(-x\right)\right)} \]

   15. count-2 99.9%

       \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 2, \color{blue}{2 \cdot x} - \left(-x\right)\right) \]

   16. neg-mul-1 99.9%

       \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 2, 2 \cdot x - \color{blue}{-1 \cdot x}\right) \]

   17. distribute-rgt-out-- 99.9%

       \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 2, \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(2 - -1\right)}\right) \]

   18. metadata-eval 99.9%

       \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 2, x \cdot \color{blue}{3}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 2, x \cdot 3\right)} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. add-log-exp 24.4%

      \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\log \left(e^{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 2, x \cdot 3\right)}\right)} \]

   2. *-un-lft-identity 24.4%

      \[\leadsto z + \log \color{blue}{\left(1 \cdot e^{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 2, x \cdot 3\right)}\right)} \]

   3. log-prod 24.4%

      \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(\log 1 + \log \left(e^{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 2, x \cdot 3\right)}\right)\right)} \]

   4. metadata-eval 24.4%

      \[\leadsto z + \left(\color{blue}{0} + \log \left(e^{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 2, x \cdot 3\right)}\right)\right) \]

   5. add-log-exp 99.9%

      \[\leadsto z + \left(0 + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 2, x \cdot 3\right)}\right) \]

   6. fma-udef 99.9%

      \[\leadsto z + \left(0 + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 2 + x \cdot 3\right)}\right) \]

   7. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto z + \left(0 + \color{blue}{\left(x \cdot 3 + y \cdot 2\right)}\right) \]

   8. fma-def 100.0%

      \[\leadsto z + \left(0 + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, y \cdot 2\right)}\right) \]

   9. *-commutative 100.0%

      \[\leadsto z + \left(0 + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, \color{blue}{2 \cdot y}\right)\right) \]

5. Applied egg-rr 100.0%

   \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(0 + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, 2 \cdot y\right)\right)} \]

6. Final simplification 100.0%

   \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(x, 3, 2 \cdot y\right) \]

Alternative 2: 99.9% accurate, 0.1× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z + \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 2, x \cdot 3\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ z (fma y 2.0 (* x 3.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z + fma(y, 2.0, (x * 3.0));
}

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(z + fma(y, 2.0, Float64(x * 3.0)))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(z + N[(y * 2.0 + N[(x * 3.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)} + x \]

   2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + x\right)} \]

   3. remove-double-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + x\right)\right)\right)} \]

   4. distribute-neg-in 99.9%

      \[\leadsto z + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right) + \left(-x\right)\right)}\right) \]

   5. distribute-neg-in 99.9%

      \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-\left(-\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)\right) + \left(-\left(-x\right)\right)\right)} \]

   6. remove-double-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto z + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)} + \left(-\left(-x\right)\right)\right) \]

   7. sub-neg 99.9%

      \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) - \left(-x\right)\right)} \]

   8. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(x + \left(y + y\right)\right)} + x\right) - \left(-x\right)\right) \]

   9. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(y + y\right) + x\right)} + x\right) - \left(-x\right)\right) \]

   10. associate-+r+ 99.9%

       \[\leadsto z + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(y + y\right) + \left(x + x\right)\right)} - \left(-x\right)\right) \]

   11. associate--l+ 99.9%

       \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(\left(y + y\right) + \left(\left(x + x\right) - \left(-x\right)\right)\right)} \]

   12. count-2 99.9%

       \[\leadsto z + \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot y} + \left(\left(x + x\right) - \left(-x\right)\right)\right) \]

   13. *-commutative 99.9%

       \[\leadsto z + \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot 2} + \left(\left(x + x\right) - \left(-x\right)\right)\right) \]

   14. fma-def 99.9%

       \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 2, \left(x + x\right) - \left(-x\right)\right)} \]

   15. count-2 99.9%

       \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 2, \color{blue}{2 \cdot x} - \left(-x\right)\right) \]

   16. neg-mul-1 99.9%

       \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 2, 2 \cdot x - \color{blue}{-1 \cdot x}\right) \]

   17. distribute-rgt-out-- 99.9%

       \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 2, \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(2 - -1\right)}\right) \]

   18. metadata-eval 99.9%

       \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 2, x \cdot \color{blue}{3}\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 2, x \cdot 3\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 2, x \cdot 3\right) \]

Alternative 3: 51.5% accurate, 0.6× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -3.5 \cdot 10^{-32}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -5.5 \cdot 10^{-300}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 4.2 \cdot 10^{-297}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 3\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.05 \cdot 10^{-185}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 7 \cdot 10^{-104}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 3\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.8 \cdot 10^{-31}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+80}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 3\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -3.5e-32)
   (* 2.0 y)
   (if (<= y -5.5e-300)
     z
     (if (<= y 4.2e-297)
       (* x 3.0)
       (if (<= y 1.05e-185)
         z
         (if (<= y 7e-104)
           (* x 3.0)
           (if (<= y 1.8e-31) z (if (<= y 2e+80) (* x 3.0) (* 2.0 y)))))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -3.5e-32) {
		tmp = 2.0 * y;
	} else if (y <= -5.5e-300) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (y <= 4.2e-297) {
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	} else if (y <= 1.05e-185) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (y <= 7e-104) {
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	} else if (y <= 1.8e-31) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (y <= 2e+80) {
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-3.5d-32)) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * y
    else if (y <= (-5.5d-300)) then
        tmp = z
    else if (y <= 4.2d-297) then
        tmp = x * 3.0d0
    else if (y <= 1.05d-185) then
        tmp = z
    else if (y <= 7d-104) then
        tmp = x * 3.0d0
    else if (y <= 1.8d-31) then
        tmp = z
    else if (y <= 2d+80) then
        tmp = x * 3.0d0
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -3.5e-32) {
		tmp = 2.0 * y;
	} else if (y <= -5.5e-300) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (y <= 4.2e-297) {
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	} else if (y <= 1.05e-185) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (y <= 7e-104) {
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	} else if (y <= 1.8e-31) {
		tmp = z;
	} else if (y <= 2e+80) {
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -3.5e-32:
		tmp = 2.0 * y
	elif y <= -5.5e-300:
		tmp = z
	elif y <= 4.2e-297:
		tmp = x * 3.0
	elif y <= 1.05e-185:
		tmp = z
	elif y <= 7e-104:
		tmp = x * 3.0
	elif y <= 1.8e-31:
		tmp = z
	elif y <= 2e+80:
		tmp = x * 3.0
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -3.5e-32)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * y);
	elseif (y <= -5.5e-300)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (y <= 4.2e-297)
		tmp = Float64(x * 3.0);
	elseif (y <= 1.05e-185)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (y <= 7e-104)
		tmp = Float64(x * 3.0);
	elseif (y <= 1.8e-31)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (y <= 2e+80)
		tmp = Float64(x * 3.0);
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -3.5e-32)
		tmp = 2.0 * y;
	elseif (y <= -5.5e-300)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (y <= 4.2e-297)
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	elseif (y <= 1.05e-185)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (y <= 7e-104)
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	elseif (y <= 1.8e-31)
		tmp = z;
	elseif (y <= 2e+80)
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -3.5e-32], N[(2.0 * y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, -5.5e-300], z, If[LessEqual[y, 4.2e-297], N[(x * 3.0), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 1.05e-185], z, If[LessEqual[y, 7e-104], N[(x * 3.0), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 1.8e-31], z, If[LessEqual[y, 2e+80], N[(x * 3.0), $MachinePrecision], N[(2.0 * y), $MachinePrecision]]]]]]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < -3.4999999999999999e-32 or 2e80 < y

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + z\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)}\right) + z\right) \]

      4. count-2 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} + z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 67.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot y} \]

   if -3.4999999999999999e-32 < y < -5.4999999999999999e-300 or 4.20000000000000027e-297 < y < 1.05e-185 or 7.00000000000000057e-104 < y < 1.80000000000000002e-31

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + z\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)}\right) + z\right) \]

      4. count-2 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} + z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 62.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]

   if -5.4999999999999999e-300 < y < 4.20000000000000027e-297 or 1.05e-185 < y < 7.00000000000000057e-104 or 1.80000000000000002e-31 < y < 2e80

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + z\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)}\right) + z\right) \]

      4. count-2 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} + z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 69.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3 \cdot x} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 65.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -3.5 \cdot 10^{-32}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq -5.5 \cdot 10^{-300}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 4.2 \cdot 10^{-297}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 3\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.05 \cdot 10^{-185}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 7 \cdot 10^{-104}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 3\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.8 \cdot 10^{-31}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 2 \cdot 10^{+80}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 3\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 78.2% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -3.8 \cdot 10^{+205}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 3\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -5.7 \cdot 10^{+137} \lor \neg \left(x \leq -8.8 \cdot 10^{+46}\right) \land x \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+80}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + 2 \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 3\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -3.8e+205)
   (* x 3.0)
   (if (or (<= x -5.7e+137) (and (not (<= x -8.8e+46)) (<= x 4e+80)))
     (+ z (* 2.0 y))
     (* x 3.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -3.8e+205) {
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	} else if ((x <= -5.7e+137) || (!(x <= -8.8e+46) && (x <= 4e+80))) {
		tmp = z + (2.0 * y);
	} else {
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-3.8d+205)) then
        tmp = x * 3.0d0
    else if ((x <= (-5.7d+137)) .or. (.not. (x <= (-8.8d+46))) .and. (x <= 4d+80)) then
        tmp = z + (2.0d0 * y)
    else
        tmp = x * 3.0d0
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -3.8e+205) {
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	} else if ((x <= -5.7e+137) || (!(x <= -8.8e+46) && (x <= 4e+80))) {
		tmp = z + (2.0 * y);
	} else {
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -3.8e+205:
		tmp = x * 3.0
	elif (x <= -5.7e+137) or (not (x <= -8.8e+46) and (x <= 4e+80)):
		tmp = z + (2.0 * y)
	else:
		tmp = x * 3.0
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -3.8e+205)
		tmp = Float64(x * 3.0);
	elseif ((x <= -5.7e+137) || (!(x <= -8.8e+46) && (x <= 4e+80)))
		tmp = Float64(z + Float64(2.0 * y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x * 3.0);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -3.8e+205)
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	elseif ((x <= -5.7e+137) || (~((x <= -8.8e+46)) && (x <= 4e+80)))
		tmp = z + (2.0 * y);
	else
		tmp = x * 3.0;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[x, -3.8e+205], N[(x * 3.0), $MachinePrecision], If[Or[LessEqual[x, -5.7e+137], And[N[Not[LessEqual[x, -8.8e+46]], $MachinePrecision], LessEqual[x, 4e+80]]], N[(z + N[(2.0 * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x * 3.0), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -3.8e205 or -5.6999999999999999e137 < x < -8.8000000000000001e46 or 4e80 < x

   1. Initial program 99.8%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + z\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)}\right) + z\right) \]

      4. count-2 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} + z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 76.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3 \cdot x} \]

   if -3.8e205 < x < -5.6999999999999999e137 or -8.8000000000000001e46 < x < 4e80

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + z\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)}\right) + z\right) \]

      4. count-2 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} + z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 90.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot y + z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 85.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -3.8 \cdot 10^{+205}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 3\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq -5.7 \cdot 10^{+137} \lor \neg \left(x \leq -8.8 \cdot 10^{+46}\right) \land x \leq 4 \cdot 10^{+80}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + 2 \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x \cdot 3\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 84.9% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -9 \cdot 10^{-35}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + 2 \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 7.5 \cdot 10^{+87}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + x \cdot 3\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -9e-35)
   (+ z (* 2.0 y))
   (if (<= y 7.5e+87) (+ z (* x 3.0)) (+ x (* 2.0 (+ x y))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -9e-35) {
		tmp = z + (2.0 * y);
	} else if (y <= 7.5e+87) {
		tmp = z + (x * 3.0);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (2.0 * (x + y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-9d-35)) then
        tmp = z + (2.0d0 * y)
    else if (y <= 7.5d+87) then
        tmp = z + (x * 3.0d0)
    else
        tmp = x + (2.0d0 * (x + y))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -9e-35) {
		tmp = z + (2.0 * y);
	} else if (y <= 7.5e+87) {
		tmp = z + (x * 3.0);
	} else {
		tmp = x + (2.0 * (x + y));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -9e-35:
		tmp = z + (2.0 * y)
	elif y <= 7.5e+87:
		tmp = z + (x * 3.0)
	else:
		tmp = x + (2.0 * (x + y))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -9e-35)
		tmp = Float64(z + Float64(2.0 * y));
	elseif (y <= 7.5e+87)
		tmp = Float64(z + Float64(x * 3.0));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(2.0 * Float64(x + y)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -9e-35)
		tmp = z + (2.0 * y);
	elseif (y <= 7.5e+87)
		tmp = z + (x * 3.0);
	else
		tmp = x + (2.0 * (x + y));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -9e-35], N[(z + N[(2.0 * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 7.5e+87], N[(z + N[(x * 3.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(2.0 * N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if y < -9.0000000000000002e-35

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + z\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)}\right) + z\right) \]

      4. count-2 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} + z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 82.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot y + z} \]

   if -9.0000000000000002e-35 < y < 7.50000000000000014e87

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)} + x \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + x\right)} \]

      3. remove-double-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + x\right)\right)\right)} \]

      4. distribute-neg-in 99.9%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right) + \left(-x\right)\right)}\right) \]

      5. distribute-neg-in 99.9%

         \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-\left(-\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)\right) + \left(-\left(-x\right)\right)\right)} \]

      6. remove-double-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)} + \left(-\left(-x\right)\right)\right) \]

      7. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) - \left(-x\right)\right)} \]

      8. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(x + \left(y + y\right)\right)} + x\right) - \left(-x\right)\right) \]

      9. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(y + y\right) + x\right)} + x\right) - \left(-x\right)\right) \]

      10. associate-+r+ 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(y + y\right) + \left(x + x\right)\right)} - \left(-x\right)\right) \]

      11. associate--l+ 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(\left(y + y\right) + \left(\left(x + x\right) - \left(-x\right)\right)\right)} \]

      12. count-2 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z + \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot y} + \left(\left(x + x\right) - \left(-x\right)\right)\right) \]

      13. *-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z + \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot 2} + \left(\left(x + x\right) - \left(-x\right)\right)\right) \]

      14. fma-def 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 2, \left(x + x\right) - \left(-x\right)\right)} \]

      15. count-2 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 2, \color{blue}{2 \cdot x} - \left(-x\right)\right) \]

      16. neg-mul-1 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 2, 2 \cdot x - \color{blue}{-1 \cdot x}\right) \]

      17. distribute-rgt-out-- 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 2, \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(2 - -1\right)}\right) \]

      18. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 2, x \cdot \color{blue}{3}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 2, x \cdot 3\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 94.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3 \cdot x + z} \]

   if 7.50000000000000014e87 < y

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + z\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)}\right) + z\right) \]

      4. count-2 100.0%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} + z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 86.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(y + x\right) + x} \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 89.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -9 \cdot 10^{-35}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + 2 \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 7.5 \cdot 10^{+87}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + x \cdot 3\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 6: 84.8% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -4.4 \cdot 10^{-37} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 3 \cdot 10^{+87}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z + 2 \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + x \cdot 3\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= y -4.4e-37) (not (<= y 3e+87))) (+ z (* 2.0 y)) (+ z (* x 3.0))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -4.4e-37) || !(y <= 3e+87)) {
		tmp = z + (2.0 * y);
	} else {
		tmp = z + (x * 3.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((y <= (-4.4d-37)) .or. (.not. (y <= 3d+87))) then
        tmp = z + (2.0d0 * y)
    else
        tmp = z + (x * 3.0d0)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((y <= -4.4e-37) || !(y <= 3e+87)) {
		tmp = z + (2.0 * y);
	} else {
		tmp = z + (x * 3.0);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (y <= -4.4e-37) or not (y <= 3e+87):
		tmp = z + (2.0 * y)
	else:
		tmp = z + (x * 3.0)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((y <= -4.4e-37) || !(y <= 3e+87))
		tmp = Float64(z + Float64(2.0 * y));
	else
		tmp = Float64(z + Float64(x * 3.0));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((y <= -4.4e-37) || ~((y <= 3e+87)))
		tmp = z + (2.0 * y);
	else
		tmp = z + (x * 3.0);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[y, -4.4e-37], N[Not[LessEqual[y, 3e+87]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(z + N[(2.0 * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(z + N[(x * 3.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -4.40000000000000004e-37 or 2.9999999999999999e87 < y

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + z\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)}\right) + z\right) \]

      4. count-2 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} + z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around 0 84.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot y + z} \]

   if -4.40000000000000004e-37 < y < 2.9999999999999999e87

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(z + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)} + x \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + x\right)} \]

      3. remove-double-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(-\left(-\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + x\right)\right)\right)} \]

      4. distribute-neg-in 99.9%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right) + \left(-x\right)\right)}\right) \]

      5. distribute-neg-in 99.9%

         \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-\left(-\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)\right)\right) + \left(-\left(-x\right)\right)\right)} \]

      6. remove-double-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right)} + \left(-\left(-x\right)\right)\right) \]

      7. sub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) - \left(-x\right)\right)} \]

      8. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(x + \left(y + y\right)\right)} + x\right) - \left(-x\right)\right) \]

      9. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto z + \left(\left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(y + y\right) + x\right)} + x\right) - \left(-x\right)\right) \]

      10. associate-+r+ 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(y + y\right) + \left(x + x\right)\right)} - \left(-x\right)\right) \]

      11. associate--l+ 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\left(\left(y + y\right) + \left(\left(x + x\right) - \left(-x\right)\right)\right)} \]

      12. count-2 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z + \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot y} + \left(\left(x + x\right) - \left(-x\right)\right)\right) \]

      13. *-commutative 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z + \left(\color{blue}{y \cdot 2} + \left(\left(x + x\right) - \left(-x\right)\right)\right) \]

      14. fma-def 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z + \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(y, 2, \left(x + x\right) - \left(-x\right)\right)} \]

      15. count-2 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 2, \color{blue}{2 \cdot x} - \left(-x\right)\right) \]

      16. neg-mul-1 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 2, 2 \cdot x - \color{blue}{-1 \cdot x}\right) \]

      17. distribute-rgt-out-- 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 2, \color{blue}{x \cdot \left(2 - -1\right)}\right) \]

      18. metadata-eval 99.9%

          \[\leadsto z + \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 2, x \cdot \color{blue}{3}\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z + \mathsf{fma}\left(y, 2, x \cdot 3\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 93.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{3 \cdot x + z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 89.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -4.4 \cdot 10^{-37} \lor \neg \left(y \leq 3 \cdot 10^{+87}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;z + 2 \cdot y\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;z + x \cdot 3\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 7: 99.9% accurate, 1.2× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(z + 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (+ z (* 2.0 (+ x y)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (z + (2.0 * (x + y)));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (z + (2.0d0 * (x + y)))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (z + (2.0 * (x + y)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (z + (2.0 * (x + y)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(z + Float64(2.0 * Float64(x + y))))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (z + (2.0 * (x + y)));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(z + N[(2.0 * N[(x + y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right)} \]

   2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + z\right) \]

   3. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)}\right) + z\right) \]

   4. count-2 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} + z\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + z\right)} \]

4. Final simplification 99.9%

   \[\leadsto x + \left(z + 2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)\right) \]

Alternative 8: 51.2% accurate, 1.5× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -3.5 \cdot 10^{-32}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{+89}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot y\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= y -3.5e-32) (* 2.0 y) (if (<= y 1.25e+89) z (* 2.0 y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -3.5e-32) {
		tmp = 2.0 * y;
	} else if (y <= 1.25e+89) {
		tmp = z;
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (y <= (-3.5d-32)) then
        tmp = 2.0d0 * y
    else if (y <= 1.25d+89) then
        tmp = z
    else
        tmp = 2.0d0 * y
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (y <= -3.5e-32) {
		tmp = 2.0 * y;
	} else if (y <= 1.25e+89) {
		tmp = z;
	} else {
		tmp = 2.0 * y;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if y <= -3.5e-32:
		tmp = 2.0 * y
	elif y <= 1.25e+89:
		tmp = z
	else:
		tmp = 2.0 * y
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (y <= -3.5e-32)
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * y);
	elseif (y <= 1.25e+89)
		tmp = z;
	else
		tmp = Float64(2.0 * y);
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (y <= -3.5e-32)
		tmp = 2.0 * y;
	elseif (y <= 1.25e+89)
		tmp = z;
	else
		tmp = 2.0 * y;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[y, -3.5e-32], N[(2.0 * y), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[y, 1.25e+89], z, N[(2.0 * y), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if y < -3.4999999999999999e-32 or 1.24999999999999996e89 < y

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + z\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)}\right) + z\right) \]

      4. count-2 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} + z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in y around inf 68.2%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{2 \cdot y} \]

   if -3.4999999999999999e-32 < y < 1.24999999999999996e89

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right)} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + z\right) \]

      3. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)}\right) + z\right) \]

      4. count-2 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} + z\right) \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + z\right)} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 50.1%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 57.7%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;y \leq -3.5 \cdot 10^{-32}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot y\\ \mathbf{elif}\;y \leq 1.25 \cdot 10^{+89}:\\ \;\;\;\;z\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;2 \cdot y\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 9: 34.4% accurate, 11.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 z)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = z
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return z;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return z

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return z
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = z;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := z

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.9%

   \[\left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right) + x \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(\left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + y\right) + x\right) + z\right)} \]

   2. associate-+l+ 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{\left(\left(x + y\right) + \left(y + x\right)\right)} + z\right) \]

   3. +-commutative 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(\left(x + y\right) + \color{blue}{\left(x + y\right)}\right) + z\right) \]

   4. count-2 99.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \left(\color{blue}{2 \cdot \left(x + y\right)} + z\right) \]

3. Simplified 99.9%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x + \left(2 \cdot \left(x + y\right) + z\right)} \]

4. Taylor expanded in z around inf 36.2%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z} \]

5. Final simplification 36.2%

   \[\leadsto z \]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023274 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Graphics.Rendering.Plot.Render.Plot.Legend:renderLegendInside from plot-0.2.3.4"
  :precision binary64
  (+ (+ (+ (+ (+ x y) y) x) z) x))