System.Random.MWC.Distributions:truncatedExp from mwc-random-0.13.3.2

Percentage Accurate: 61.8% → 98.4%

Time: 23.6s

Alternatives: 11

Speedup: 211.0×

• could not determine a ground truth

  1. x = -1.8163579383935454e-149
  2. y = 4.734237418407024
  3. z = 8.343075799450605e+154
  4. t = 2.007493562581058e+298

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- x (/ (log (+ (- 1.0 y) (* y (exp z)))) t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (log(((1.0 - y) + (y * exp(z)))) / t);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x - (log(((1.0d0 - y) + (y * exp(z)))) / t)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (Math.log(((1.0 - y) + (y * Math.exp(z)))) / t);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - (math.log(((1.0 - y) + (y * math.exp(z)))) / t)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(log(Float64(Float64(1.0 - y) + Float64(y * exp(z)))) / t))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x - (log(((1.0 - y) + (y * exp(z)))) / t);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(N[Log[N[(N[(1.0 - y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * N[Exp[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 61.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (- x (/ (log (+ (- 1.0 y) (* y (exp z)))) t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (log(((1.0 - y) + (y * exp(z)))) / t);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x - (log(((1.0d0 - y) + (y * exp(z)))) / t)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (Math.log(((1.0 - y) + (y * Math.exp(z)))) / t);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - (math.log(((1.0 - y) + (y * math.exp(z)))) / t)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(log(Float64(Float64(1.0 - y) + Float64(y * exp(z)))) / t))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x - (log(((1.0 - y) + (y * exp(z)))) / t);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(N[Log[N[(N[(1.0 - y), $MachinePrecision] + N[(y * N[Exp[z], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 98.4% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- x (/ (log1p (* y (expm1 z))) t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (log1p((y * expm1(z))) / t);
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (Math.log1p((y * Math.expm1(z))) / t);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - (math.log1p((y * math.expm1(z))) / t)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(log1p(Float64(y * expm1(z))) / t))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(N[Log[1 + N[(y * N[(Exp[z] - 1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 53.4%

   \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 53.4%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

   2. associate-+l+ 68.7%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

   3. cancel-sign-sub 68.7%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   4. log1p-def 73.9%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}}{t} \]

   5. cancel-sign-sub 73.9%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

   6. +-commutative 73.9%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   7. unsub-neg 73.9%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

   8. *-rgt-identity 73.9%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

   9. distribute-lft-out-- 73.9%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   10. expm1-def 99.1%

       \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

3. Simplified 99.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]

4. Final simplification 99.1%

   \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t} \]

Alternative 2: 93.8% accurate, 1.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -12500:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{-1}{\frac{t}{y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)} + t \cdot 0.5}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot z + \left(y \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)\right)}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -12500.0)
   (+ x (/ -1.0 (+ (/ t (* y (expm1 z))) (* t 0.5))))
   (- x (/ (log1p (+ (* y z) (* (* y 0.5) (* z z)))) t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -12500.0) {
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / ((t / (y * expm1(z))) + (t * 0.5)));
	} else {
		tmp = x - (log1p(((y * z) + ((y * 0.5) * (z * z)))) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -12500.0) {
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / ((t / (y * Math.expm1(z))) + (t * 0.5)));
	} else {
		tmp = x - (Math.log1p(((y * z) + ((y * 0.5) * (z * z)))) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -12500.0:
		tmp = x + (-1.0 / ((t / (y * math.expm1(z))) + (t * 0.5)))
	else:
		tmp = x - (math.log1p(((y * z) + ((y * 0.5) * (z * z)))) / t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -12500.0)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(-1.0 / Float64(Float64(t / Float64(y * expm1(z))) + Float64(t * 0.5))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(log1p(Float64(Float64(y * z) + Float64(Float64(y * 0.5) * Float64(z * z)))) / t));
	end
	return tmp
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[z, -12500.0], N[(x + N[(-1.0 / N[(N[(t / N[(y * N[(Exp[z] - 1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(t * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x - N[(N[Log[1 + N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(y * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] * N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -12500

   1. Initial program 78.3%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 78.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 78.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. cancel-sign-sub 78.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      4. log1p-def 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}}{t} \]

      5. cancel-sign-sub 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      7. unsub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      8. *-rgt-identity 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      9. distribute-lft-out-- 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      10. expm1-def 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. clear-num 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}}} \]

      2. inv-pow 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{{\left(\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}\right)}^{-1}} \]

   5. Applied egg-rr 99.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{{\left(\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}\right)}^{-1}} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. unpow-1 99.8%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}}} \]

   7. Applied egg-rr 99.8%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}}} \]

   8. Taylor expanded in y around 0 91.0%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\frac{t}{\left(e^{z} - 1\right) \cdot y} + 0.5 \cdot t}} \]
   9. Step-by-step derivation

      1. expm1-def 91.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{1}{\frac{t}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)} \cdot y} + 0.5 \cdot t} \]

      2. *-commutative 91.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{1}{\frac{t}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right) \cdot y} + \color{blue}{t \cdot 0.5}} \]

   10. Simplified 91.0%

       \[\leadsto x - \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\frac{t}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right) \cdot y} + t \cdot 0.5}} \]

   if -12500 < z

   1. Initial program 46.2%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 46.2%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 65.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. cancel-sign-sub 65.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      4. log1p-def 66.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}}{t} \]

      5. cancel-sign-sub 66.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. +-commutative 66.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      7. unsub-neg 66.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      8. *-rgt-identity 66.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      9. distribute-lft-out-- 66.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      10. expm1-def 98.8%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 98.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 98.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot z + \left(0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot {z}^{2}\right) + 0.16666666666666666 \cdot \left(y \cdot {z}^{3}\right)\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   5. Taylor expanded in z around 0 98.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{0.5 \cdot \left(y \cdot {z}^{2}\right)}\right)}{t} \]
   6. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 98.5%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot y\right) \cdot {z}^{2}}\right)}{t} \]

      2. unpow2 98.5%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot z + \left(0.5 \cdot y\right) \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      3. *-commutative 98.5%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 0.5\right)} \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)\right)}{t} \]

   7. Simplified 98.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot z + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)}\right)}{t} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 96.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -12500:\\ \;\;\;\;x + \frac{-1}{\frac{t}{y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)} + t \cdot 0.5}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot z + \left(y \cdot 0.5\right) \cdot \left(z \cdot z\right)\right)}{t}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 89.7% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \frac{-1}{\frac{t}{y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)} + t \cdot 0.5} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (+ x (/ -1.0 (+ (/ t (* y (expm1 z))) (* t 0.5)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + (-1.0 / ((t / (y * expm1(z))) + (t * 0.5)));
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x + (-1.0 / ((t / (y * Math.expm1(z))) + (t * 0.5)));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x + (-1.0 / ((t / (y * math.expm1(z))) + (t * 0.5)))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x + Float64(-1.0 / Float64(Float64(t / Float64(y * expm1(z))) + Float64(t * 0.5))))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x + N[(-1.0 / N[(N[(t / N[(y * N[(Exp[z] - 1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(t * 0.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 53.4%

   \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 53.4%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

   2. associate-+l+ 68.7%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

   3. cancel-sign-sub 68.7%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   4. log1p-def 73.9%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}}{t} \]

   5. cancel-sign-sub 73.9%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

   6. +-commutative 73.9%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   7. unsub-neg 73.9%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

   8. *-rgt-identity 73.9%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

   9. distribute-lft-out-- 73.9%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   10. expm1-def 99.1%

       \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

3. Simplified 99.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]
4. Step-by-step derivation

   1. clear-num 99.0%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}}} \]

   2. inv-pow 99.0%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{{\left(\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}\right)}^{-1}} \]

5. Applied egg-rr 99.0%

   \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{{\left(\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}\right)}^{-1}} \]
6. Step-by-step derivation

   1. unpow-1 99.0%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}}} \]

7. Applied egg-rr 99.0%

   \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{t}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}}} \]

8. Taylor expanded in y around 0 71.6%

   \[\leadsto x - \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\frac{t}{\left(e^{z} - 1\right) \cdot y} + 0.5 \cdot t}} \]
9. Step-by-step derivation

   1. expm1-def 90.9%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{1}{\frac{t}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)} \cdot y} + 0.5 \cdot t} \]

   2. *-commutative 90.9%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{1}{\frac{t}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right) \cdot y} + \color{blue}{t \cdot 0.5}} \]

10. Simplified 90.9%

    \[\leadsto x - \frac{1}{\color{blue}{\frac{t}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right) \cdot y} + t \cdot 0.5}} \]

11. Final simplification 90.9%

    \[\leadsto x + \frac{-1}{\frac{t}{y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)} + t \cdot 0.5} \]

Alternative 4: 86.2% accurate, 2.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}{t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- x (* y (/ (expm1 z) t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (y * (expm1(z) / t));
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - (y * (Math.expm1(z) / t));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - (y * (math.expm1(z) / t))

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(y * Float64(expm1(z) / t)))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(y * N[(N[(Exp[z] - 1), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 53.4%

   \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 53.4%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

   2. associate-+l+ 68.7%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

   3. cancel-sign-sub 68.7%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   4. log1p-def 73.9%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}}{t} \]

   5. cancel-sign-sub 73.9%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

   6. +-commutative 73.9%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   7. unsub-neg 73.9%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

   8. *-rgt-identity 73.9%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

   9. distribute-lft-out-- 73.9%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   10. expm1-def 99.1%

       \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

3. Simplified 99.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]

4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 69.0%

   \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{\left(e^{z} - 1\right) \cdot y}{t}} \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-/l* 68.0%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{e^{z} - 1}{\frac{t}{y}}} \]

   2. expm1-def 83.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}}{\frac{t}{y}} \]

6. Simplified 83.5%

   \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}{\frac{t}{y}}} \]
7. Step-by-step derivation

   1. associate-/r/ 87.4%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}{t} \cdot y} \]

8. Applied egg-rr 87.4%

   \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}{t} \cdot y} \]

9. Final simplification 87.4%

   \[\leadsto x - y \cdot \frac{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}{t} \]

Alternative 5: 85.3% accurate, 2.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \frac{y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}{t} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 (- x (/ (* y (expm1 z)) t)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - ((y * expm1(z)) / t);
}

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x - ((y * Math.expm1(z)) / t);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x - ((y * math.expm1(z)) / t)

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return Float64(x - Float64(Float64(y * expm1(z)) / t))
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := N[(x - N[(N[(y * N[(Exp[z] - 1), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 53.4%

   \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 53.4%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

   2. associate-+l+ 68.7%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

   3. cancel-sign-sub 68.7%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   4. log1p-def 73.9%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}}{t} \]

   5. cancel-sign-sub 73.9%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

   6. +-commutative 73.9%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   7. unsub-neg 73.9%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

   8. *-rgt-identity 73.9%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

   9. distribute-lft-out-- 73.9%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   10. expm1-def 99.1%

       \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

3. Simplified 99.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]

4. Taylor expanded in y around 0 69.0%

   \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\left(e^{z} - 1\right) \cdot y}}{t} \]
5. Step-by-step derivation

   1. expm1-def 87.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)} \cdot y}{t} \]

6. Simplified 87.5%

   \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right) \cdot y}}{t} \]

7. Final simplification 87.5%

   \[\leadsto x - \frac{y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}{t} \]

Alternative 6: 70.4% accurate, 20.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq 1.6 \cdot 10^{-289}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 1.05 \cdot 10^{-195}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(-\frac{y}{t}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= t 1.6e-289) x (if (<= t 1.05e-195) (* z (- (/ y t))) x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (t <= 1.6e-289) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (t <= 1.05e-195) {
		tmp = z * -(y / t);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (t <= 1.6d-289) then
        tmp = x
    else if (t <= 1.05d-195) then
        tmp = z * -(y / t)
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (t <= 1.6e-289) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (t <= 1.05e-195) {
		tmp = z * -(y / t);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if t <= 1.6e-289:
		tmp = x
	elif t <= 1.05e-195:
		tmp = z * -(y / t)
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t <= 1.6e-289)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (t <= 1.05e-195)
		tmp = Float64(z * Float64(-Float64(y / t)));
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t <= 1.6e-289)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (t <= 1.05e-195)
		tmp = z * -(y / t);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[t, 1.6e-289], x, If[LessEqual[t, 1.05e-195], N[(z * (-N[(y / t), $MachinePrecision])), $MachinePrecision], x]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if t < 1.6000000000000001e-289 or 1.05e-195 < t

   1. Initial program 56.5%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 56.5%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 73.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. cancel-sign-sub 73.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      4. log1p-def 77.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}}{t} \]

      5. cancel-sign-sub 77.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. +-commutative 77.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      7. unsub-neg 77.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      8. *-rgt-identity 77.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      9. distribute-lft-out-- 77.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      10. expm1-def 99.4%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 70.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if 1.6000000000000001e-289 < t < 1.05e-195

   1. Initial program 17.1%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 17.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 17.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. cancel-sign-sub 17.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      4. log1p-def 32.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}}{t} \]

      5. cancel-sign-sub 32.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. +-commutative 32.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      7. unsub-neg 32.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      8. *-rgt-identity 32.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      9. distribute-lft-out-- 32.0%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      10. expm1-def 94.8%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 94.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 62.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot z}{t}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 67.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{t}{z}}} \]

      2. associate-/r/ 62.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{t} \cdot z} \]

   6. Simplified 62.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{t} \cdot z} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in x around 0 52.8%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{y \cdot z}{t}} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 52.8%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\frac{y \cdot z}{t}} \]

      2. *-commutative 52.8%

         \[\leadsto -\frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot y}}{t} \]

      3. associate-*r/ 53.0%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{z \cdot \frac{y}{t}} \]

      4. distribute-rgt-neg-in 53.0%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(-\frac{y}{t}\right)} \]

      5. distribute-neg-frac 53.0%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{-y}{t}} \]

   9. Simplified 53.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \frac{-y}{t}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 69.2%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq 1.6 \cdot 10^{-289}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 1.05 \cdot 10^{-195}:\\ \;\;\;\;z \cdot \left(-\frac{y}{t}\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 7: 70.2% accurate, 20.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -5.2 \cdot 10^{-167}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 1.4 \cdot 10^{-195}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \frac{-z}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= t -5.2e-167) x (if (<= t 1.4e-195) (* y (/ (- z) t)) x)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (t <= -5.2e-167) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (t <= 1.4e-195) {
		tmp = y * (-z / t);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (t <= (-5.2d-167)) then
        tmp = x
    else if (t <= 1.4d-195) then
        tmp = y * (-z / t)
    else
        tmp = x
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (t <= -5.2e-167) {
		tmp = x;
	} else if (t <= 1.4e-195) {
		tmp = y * (-z / t);
	} else {
		tmp = x;
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if t <= -5.2e-167:
		tmp = x
	elif t <= 1.4e-195:
		tmp = y * (-z / t)
	else:
		tmp = x
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t <= -5.2e-167)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (t <= 1.4e-195)
		tmp = Float64(y * Float64(Float64(-z) / t));
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (t <= -5.2e-167)
		tmp = x;
	elseif (t <= 1.4e-195)
		tmp = y * (-z / t);
	else
		tmp = x;
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[t, -5.2e-167], x, If[LessEqual[t, 1.4e-195], N[(y * N[((-z) / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], x]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if t < -5.1999999999999998e-167 or 1.40000000000000002e-195 < t

   1. Initial program 60.4%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 60.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 78.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. cancel-sign-sub 78.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      4. log1p-def 82.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}}{t} \]

      5. cancel-sign-sub 82.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. +-commutative 82.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      7. unsub-neg 82.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      8. *-rgt-identity 82.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      9. distribute-lft-out-- 82.5%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      10. expm1-def 99.4%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 76.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -5.1999999999999998e-167 < t < 1.40000000000000002e-195

   1. Initial program 25.4%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 25.4%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 27.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. cancel-sign-sub 27.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      4. log1p-def 39.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}}{t} \]

      5. cancel-sign-sub 39.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. +-commutative 39.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      7. unsub-neg 39.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      8. *-rgt-identity 39.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      9. distribute-lft-out-- 39.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      10. expm1-def 97.7%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 97.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 70.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot z}{t}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 72.1%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{t}{z}}} \]

      2. associate-/r/ 57.5%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{t} \cdot z} \]

   6. Simplified 57.5%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{t} \cdot z} \]

   7. Taylor expanded in x around 0 48.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{y \cdot z}{t}} \]
   8. Step-by-step derivation

      1. mul-1-neg 48.5%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\frac{y \cdot z}{t}} \]

      2. *-commutative 48.5%

         \[\leadsto -\frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot y}}{t} \]

      3. associate-*r/ 35.7%

         \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{z \cdot \frac{y}{t}} \]

      4. distribute-rgt-neg-in 35.7%

         \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \left(-\frac{y}{t}\right)} \]

      5. distribute-neg-frac 35.7%

         \[\leadsto z \cdot \color{blue}{\frac{-y}{t}} \]

   9. Simplified 35.7%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{z \cdot \frac{-y}{t}} \]

   10. Taylor expanded in z around 0 48.5%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \frac{y \cdot z}{t}} \]
   11. Step-by-step derivation

       1. mul-1-neg 48.5%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\frac{y \cdot z}{t}} \]

       2. *-commutative 48.5%

          \[\leadsto -\frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot y}}{t} \]

       3. associate-/l* 35.8%

          \[\leadsto -\color{blue}{\frac{z}{\frac{t}{y}}} \]

       4. distribute-neg-frac 35.8%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-z}{\frac{t}{y}}} \]

   12. Simplified 35.8%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-z}{\frac{t}{y}}} \]
   13. Step-by-step derivation

       1. associate-/r/ 50.5%

          \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-z}{t} \cdot y} \]

   14. Applied egg-rr 50.5%

       \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{-z}{t} \cdot y} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 71.4%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;t \leq -5.2 \cdot 10^{-167}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{elif}\;t \leq 1.4 \cdot 10^{-195}:\\ \;\;\;\;y \cdot \frac{-z}{t}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 8: 79.2% accurate, 23.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.72 \cdot 10^{+33}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - z \cdot \frac{y}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -1.72e+33) x (- x (* z (/ y t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.72e+33) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x - (z * (y / t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-1.72d+33)) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = x - (z * (y / t))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -1.72e+33) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x - (z * (y / t));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -1.72e+33:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = x - (z * (y / t))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -1.72e+33)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(z * Float64(y / t)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -1.72e+33)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = x - (z * (y / t));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[z, -1.72e+33], x, N[(x - N[(z * N[(y / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -1.7199999999999999e33

   1. Initial program 80.3%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 80.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 80.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. cancel-sign-sub 80.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      4. log1p-def 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}}{t} \]

      5. cancel-sign-sub 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      7. unsub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      8. *-rgt-identity 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      9. distribute-lft-out-- 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      10. expm1-def 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 71.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -1.7199999999999999e33 < z

   1. Initial program 46.3%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 46.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 65.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. cancel-sign-sub 65.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      4. log1p-def 66.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}}{t} \]

      5. cancel-sign-sub 66.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. +-commutative 66.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      7. unsub-neg 66.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      8. *-rgt-identity 66.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      9. distribute-lft-out-- 66.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      10. expm1-def 98.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 88.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot z}{t}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 87.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{t}{z}}} \]

      2. associate-/r/ 83.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{t} \cdot z} \]

   6. Simplified 83.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{t} \cdot z} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 80.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -1.72 \cdot 10^{+33}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - z \cdot \frac{y}{t}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 9: 82.2% accurate, 23.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -3.45 \cdot 10^{+34}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{\frac{t}{z}}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -3.45e+34) x (- x (/ y (/ t z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -3.45e+34) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x - (y / (t / z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-3.45d+34)) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = x - (y / (t / z))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -3.45e+34) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x - (y / (t / z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -3.45e+34:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = x - (y / (t / z))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -3.45e+34)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(y / Float64(t / z)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -3.45e+34)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = x - (y / (t / z));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[z, -3.45e+34], x, N[(x - N[(y / N[(t / z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -3.45000000000000019e34

   1. Initial program 80.3%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 80.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 80.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. cancel-sign-sub 80.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      4. log1p-def 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}}{t} \]

      5. cancel-sign-sub 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      7. unsub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      8. *-rgt-identity 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      9. distribute-lft-out-- 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      10. expm1-def 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 71.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -3.45000000000000019e34 < z

   1. Initial program 46.3%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 46.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 65.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. cancel-sign-sub 65.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      4. log1p-def 66.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}}{t} \]

      5. cancel-sign-sub 66.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. +-commutative 66.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      7. unsub-neg 66.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      8. *-rgt-identity 66.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      9. distribute-lft-out-- 66.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      10. expm1-def 98.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 88.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y \cdot z}{t}} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-/l* 87.7%

         \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{t}{z}}} \]

   6. Simplified 87.7%

      \[\leadsto x - \color{blue}{\frac{y}{\frac{t}{z}}} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 84.3%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -3.45 \cdot 10^{+34}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y}{\frac{t}{z}}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 10: 81.1% accurate, 23.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -8.8 \cdot 10^{+42}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y \cdot z}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= z -8.8e+42) x (- x (/ (* y z) t))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -8.8e+42) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x - ((y * z) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (z <= (-8.8d+42)) then
        tmp = x
    else
        tmp = x - ((y * z) / t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double tmp;
	if (z <= -8.8e+42) {
		tmp = x;
	} else {
		tmp = x - ((y * z) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	tmp = 0
	if z <= -8.8e+42:
		tmp = x
	else:
		tmp = x - ((y * z) / t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z <= -8.8e+42)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(Float64(y * z) / t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z <= -8.8e+42)
		tmp = x;
	else
		tmp = x - ((y * z) / t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := If[LessEqual[z, -8.8e+42], x, N[(x - N[(N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if z < -8.8000000000000005e42

   1. Initial program 80.3%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 80.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 80.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. cancel-sign-sub 80.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      4. log1p-def 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}}{t} \]

      5. cancel-sign-sub 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. +-commutative 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      7. unsub-neg 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      8. *-rgt-identity 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      9. distribute-lft-out-- 99.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      10. expm1-def 99.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 71.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

   if -8.8000000000000005e42 < z

   1. Initial program 46.3%

      \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
   2. Step-by-step derivation

      1. sub-neg 46.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

      2. associate-+l+ 65.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

      3. cancel-sign-sub 65.6%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      4. log1p-def 66.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}}{t} \]

      5. cancel-sign-sub 66.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

      6. +-commutative 66.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      7. unsub-neg 66.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

      8. *-rgt-identity 66.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

      9. distribute-lft-out-- 66.9%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

      10. expm1-def 98.9%

          \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   3. Simplified 98.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]

   4. Taylor expanded in z around 0 88.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{y \cdot z}}{t} \]
   5. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 88.3%

         \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot y}}{t} \]

   6. Simplified 88.3%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{z \cdot y}}{t} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 84.8%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;z \leq -8.8 \cdot 10^{+42}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{y \cdot z}{t}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 11: 71.8% accurate, 211.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z, t)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 53.4%

   \[x - \frac{\log \left(\left(1 - y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]
2. Step-by-step derivation

   1. sub-neg 53.4%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(\color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-y\right)\right)} + y \cdot e^{z}\right)}{t} \]

   2. associate-+l+ 68.7%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}\right)\right)}}{t} \]

   3. cancel-sign-sub 68.7%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\log \left(1 + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   4. log1p-def 73.9%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(-y\right) - \left(-y\right) \cdot e^{z}\right)}}{t} \]

   5. cancel-sign-sub 73.9%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(-y\right) + y \cdot e^{z}}\right)}{t} \]

   6. +-commutative 73.9%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} + \left(-y\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   7. unsub-neg 73.9%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot e^{z} - y}\right)}{t} \]

   8. *-rgt-identity 73.9%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot e^{z} - \color{blue}{y \cdot 1}\right)}{t} \]

   9. distribute-lft-out-- 73.9%

      \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{y \cdot \left(e^{z} - 1\right)}\right)}{t} \]

   10. expm1-def 99.1%

       \[\leadsto x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \color{blue}{\mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)}\right)}{t} \]

3. Simplified 99.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x - \frac{\mathsf{log1p}\left(y \cdot \mathsf{expm1}\left(z\right)\right)}{t}} \]

4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 66.1%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

5. Final simplification 66.1%

   \[\leadsto x \]

Developer target: 74.9% accurate, 1.9× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} t_1 := \frac{-0.5}{y \cdot t}\\ \mathbf{if}\;z < -2.8874623088207947 \cdot 10^{+119}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x - \frac{t_1}{z \cdot z}\right) - t_1 \cdot \frac{\frac{2}{z}}{z \cdot z}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x - \frac{\log \left(1 + z \cdot y\right)}{t}\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z t)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_1 (/ (- 0.5) (* y t))))
   (if (< z -2.8874623088207947e+119)
     (- (- x (/ t_1 (* z z))) (* t_1 (/ (/ 2.0 z) (* z z))))
     (- x (/ (log (+ 1.0 (* z y))) t)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = -0.5 / (y * t);
	double tmp;
	if (z < -2.8874623088207947e+119) {
		tmp = (x - (t_1 / (z * z))) - (t_1 * ((2.0 / z) / (z * z)));
	} else {
		tmp = x - (log((1.0 + (z * y))) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z, t)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8), intent (in) :: t
    real(8) :: t_1
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_1 = -0.5d0 / (y * t)
    if (z < (-2.8874623088207947d+119)) then
        tmp = (x - (t_1 / (z * z))) - (t_1 * ((2.0d0 / z) / (z * z)))
    else
        tmp = x - (log((1.0d0 + (z * y))) / t)
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z, double t) {
	double t_1 = -0.5 / (y * t);
	double tmp;
	if (z < -2.8874623088207947e+119) {
		tmp = (x - (t_1 / (z * z))) - (t_1 * ((2.0 / z) / (z * z)));
	} else {
		tmp = x - (Math.log((1.0 + (z * y))) / t);
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z, t):
	t_1 = -0.5 / (y * t)
	tmp = 0
	if z < -2.8874623088207947e+119:
		tmp = (x - (t_1 / (z * z))) - (t_1 * ((2.0 / z) / (z * z)))
	else:
		tmp = x - (math.log((1.0 + (z * y))) / t)
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = Float64(Float64(-0.5) / Float64(y * t))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (z < -2.8874623088207947e+119)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(x - Float64(t_1 / Float64(z * z))) - Float64(t_1 * Float64(Float64(2.0 / z) / Float64(z * z))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x - Float64(log(Float64(1.0 + Float64(z * y))) / t));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z, t)
	t_1 = -0.5 / (y * t);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (z < -2.8874623088207947e+119)
		tmp = (x - (t_1 / (z * z))) - (t_1 * ((2.0 / z) / (z * z)));
	else
		tmp = x - (log((1.0 + (z * y))) / t);
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_, t_] := Block[{t$95$1 = N[((-0.5) / N[(y * t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[Less[z, -2.8874623088207947e+119], N[(N[(x - N[(t$95$1 / N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(t$95$1 * N[(N[(2.0 / z), $MachinePrecision] / N[(z * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x - N[(N[Log[N[(1.0 + N[(z * y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] / t), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023274 
(FPCore (x y z t)
  :name "System.Random.MWC.Distributions:truncatedExp from mwc-random-0.13.3.2"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (if (< z -2.8874623088207947e+119) (- (- x (/ (/ (- 0.5) (* y t)) (* z z))) (* (/ (- 0.5) (* y t)) (/ (/ 2.0 z) (* z z)))) (- x (/ (log (+ 1.0 (* z y))) t)))

  (- x (/ (log (+ (- 1.0 y) (* y (exp z)))) t)))