Jmat.Real.lambertw, newton loop step

?

Percentage Accurate: 39.7% → 99.3%
Time: 12.2s
Precision: binary64
Cost: 15816

?

\[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
\[\begin{array}{l} t_0 := x \cdot -4 + x \cdot 1.5\\ \mathbf{if}\;wj \leq -0.00013:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{e^{-wj} \cdot x}{wj + 1}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;wj \leq 0.049:\\ \;\;\;\;{wj}^{3} \cdot \left(\left(\left(-1 - -2 \cdot t_0\right) - x \cdot -3\right) - x \cdot 0.6666666666666666\right) + \left(\left(1 - t_0\right) \cdot {wj}^{2} + \left(x + -2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;wj - \frac{wj}{wj + 1}\\ \end{array} \]
(FPCore (wj x)
 :precision binary64
 (- wj (/ (- (* wj (exp wj)) x) (+ (exp wj) (* wj (exp wj))))))
(FPCore (wj x)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (+ (* x -4.0) (* x 1.5))))
   (if (<= wj -0.00013)
     (/ (* (exp (- wj)) x) (+ wj 1.0))
     (if (<= wj 0.049)
       (+
        (*
         (pow wj 3.0)
         (- (- (- -1.0 (* -2.0 t_0)) (* x -3.0)) (* x 0.6666666666666666)))
        (+ (* (- 1.0 t_0) (pow wj 2.0)) (+ x (* -2.0 (* wj x)))))
       (- wj (/ wj (+ wj 1.0)))))))
double code(double wj, double x) {
	return wj - (((wj * exp(wj)) - x) / (exp(wj) + (wj * exp(wj))));
}
double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = (x * -4.0) + (x * 1.5);
	double tmp;
	if (wj <= -0.00013) {
		tmp = (exp(-wj) * x) / (wj + 1.0);
	} else if (wj <= 0.049) {
		tmp = (pow(wj, 3.0) * (((-1.0 - (-2.0 * t_0)) - (x * -3.0)) - (x * 0.6666666666666666))) + (((1.0 - t_0) * pow(wj, 2.0)) + (x + (-2.0 * (wj * x))));
	} else {
		tmp = wj - (wj / (wj + 1.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}
real(8) function code(wj, x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: wj
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    code = wj - (((wj * exp(wj)) - x) / (exp(wj) + (wj * exp(wj))))
end function
real(8) function code(wj, x)
    real(8), intent (in) :: wj
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8) :: t_0
    real(8) :: tmp
    t_0 = (x * (-4.0d0)) + (x * 1.5d0)
    if (wj <= (-0.00013d0)) then
        tmp = (exp(-wj) * x) / (wj + 1.0d0)
    else if (wj <= 0.049d0) then
        tmp = ((wj ** 3.0d0) * ((((-1.0d0) - ((-2.0d0) * t_0)) - (x * (-3.0d0))) - (x * 0.6666666666666666d0))) + (((1.0d0 - t_0) * (wj ** 2.0d0)) + (x + ((-2.0d0) * (wj * x))))
    else
        tmp = wj - (wj / (wj + 1.0d0))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function
public static double code(double wj, double x) {
	return wj - (((wj * Math.exp(wj)) - x) / (Math.exp(wj) + (wj * Math.exp(wj))));
}
public static double code(double wj, double x) {
	double t_0 = (x * -4.0) + (x * 1.5);
	double tmp;
	if (wj <= -0.00013) {
		tmp = (Math.exp(-wj) * x) / (wj + 1.0);
	} else if (wj <= 0.049) {
		tmp = (Math.pow(wj, 3.0) * (((-1.0 - (-2.0 * t_0)) - (x * -3.0)) - (x * 0.6666666666666666))) + (((1.0 - t_0) * Math.pow(wj, 2.0)) + (x + (-2.0 * (wj * x))));
	} else {
		tmp = wj - (wj / (wj + 1.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}
def code(wj, x):
	return wj - (((wj * math.exp(wj)) - x) / (math.exp(wj) + (wj * math.exp(wj))))
def code(wj, x):
	t_0 = (x * -4.0) + (x * 1.5)
	tmp = 0
	if wj <= -0.00013:
		tmp = (math.exp(-wj) * x) / (wj + 1.0)
	elif wj <= 0.049:
		tmp = (math.pow(wj, 3.0) * (((-1.0 - (-2.0 * t_0)) - (x * -3.0)) - (x * 0.6666666666666666))) + (((1.0 - t_0) * math.pow(wj, 2.0)) + (x + (-2.0 * (wj * x))))
	else:
		tmp = wj - (wj / (wj + 1.0))
	return tmp
function code(wj, x)
	return Float64(wj - Float64(Float64(Float64(wj * exp(wj)) - x) / Float64(exp(wj) + Float64(wj * exp(wj)))))
end
function code(wj, x)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(x * -4.0) + Float64(x * 1.5))
	tmp = 0.0
	if (wj <= -0.00013)
		tmp = Float64(Float64(exp(Float64(-wj)) * x) / Float64(wj + 1.0));
	elseif (wj <= 0.049)
		tmp = Float64(Float64((wj ^ 3.0) * Float64(Float64(Float64(-1.0 - Float64(-2.0 * t_0)) - Float64(x * -3.0)) - Float64(x * 0.6666666666666666))) + Float64(Float64(Float64(1.0 - t_0) * (wj ^ 2.0)) + Float64(x + Float64(-2.0 * Float64(wj * x)))));
	else
		tmp = Float64(wj - Float64(wj / Float64(wj + 1.0)));
	end
	return tmp
end
function tmp = code(wj, x)
	tmp = wj - (((wj * exp(wj)) - x) / (exp(wj) + (wj * exp(wj))));
end
function tmp_2 = code(wj, x)
	t_0 = (x * -4.0) + (x * 1.5);
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (wj <= -0.00013)
		tmp = (exp(-wj) * x) / (wj + 1.0);
	elseif (wj <= 0.049)
		tmp = ((wj ^ 3.0) * (((-1.0 - (-2.0 * t_0)) - (x * -3.0)) - (x * 0.6666666666666666))) + (((1.0 - t_0) * (wj ^ 2.0)) + (x + (-2.0 * (wj * x))));
	else
		tmp = wj - (wj / (wj + 1.0));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end
code[wj_, x_] := N[(wj - N[(N[(N[(wj * N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - x), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision] + N[(wj * N[Exp[wj], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]
code[wj_, x_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(x * -4.0), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x * 1.5), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[wj, -0.00013], N[(N[(N[Exp[(-wj)], $MachinePrecision] * x), $MachinePrecision] / N[(wj + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[wj, 0.049], N[(N[(N[Power[wj, 3.0], $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[(N[(-1.0 - N[(-2.0 * t$95$0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(x * -3.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] - N[(x * 0.6666666666666666), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(N[(1.0 - t$95$0), $MachinePrecision] * N[Power[wj, 2.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] + N[(x + N[(-2.0 * N[(wj * x), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(wj - N[(wj / N[(wj + 1.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]]
wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := x \cdot -4 + x \cdot 1.5\\
\mathbf{if}\;wj \leq -0.00013:\\
\;\;\;\;\frac{e^{-wj} \cdot x}{wj + 1}\\

\mathbf{elif}\;wj \leq 0.049:\\
\;\;\;\;{wj}^{3} \cdot \left(\left(\left(-1 - -2 \cdot t_0\right) - x \cdot -3\right) - x \cdot 0.6666666666666666\right) + \left(\left(1 - t_0\right) \cdot {wj}^{2} + \left(x + -2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;wj - \frac{wj}{wj + 1}\\


\end{array}

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Herbie found 20 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup

Accuracy vs Speed

The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Bogosity?

Bogosity

Try it out?

Your Program's Arguments

Results

Enter valid numbers for all inputs

Target

Original39.7%
Target64.2%
Herbie99.3%
\[wj - \left(\frac{wj}{wj + 1} - \frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right) \]

Derivation?

  1. Split input into 3 regimes
  2. if wj < -1.29999999999999989e-4

    1. Initial program 2.6%

      \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
    2. Simplified100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj + \frac{\frac{x}{e^{wj}} - wj}{wj + 1}} \]
      Step-by-step derivation

      [Start]2.6%

      \[ wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]

      sub-neg [=>]2.6%

      \[ \color{blue}{wj + \left(-\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)} \]

      div-sub [=>]2.6%

      \[ wj + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} - \frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)}\right) \]

      sub-neg [=>]2.6%

      \[ wj + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} + \left(-\frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)\right)}\right) \]

      +-commutative [=>]2.6%

      \[ wj + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right) + \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)}\right) \]

      distribute-neg-in [=>]2.6%

      \[ wj + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-\left(-\frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)\right) + \left(-\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)\right)} \]

      remove-double-neg [=>]2.6%

      \[ wj + \left(\color{blue}{\frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}} + \left(-\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)\right) \]

      sub-neg [<=]2.6%

      \[ wj + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)} \]

      div-sub [<=]2.6%

      \[ wj + \color{blue}{\frac{x - wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}} \]

      distribute-rgt1-in [=>]100.0%

      \[ wj + \frac{x - wj \cdot e^{wj}}{\color{blue}{\left(wj + 1\right) \cdot e^{wj}}} \]

      associate-/l/ [<=]100.0%

      \[ wj + \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{x - wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1}} \]
    3. Applied egg-rr100.0%

      \[\leadsto wj + \frac{\color{blue}{e^{-wj} \cdot x} - wj}{wj + 1} \]
      Step-by-step derivation

      [Start]100.0%

      \[ wj + \frac{\frac{x}{e^{wj}} - wj}{wj + 1} \]

      clear-num [=>]100.0%

      \[ wj + \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{\frac{e^{wj}}{x}}} - wj}{wj + 1} \]

      associate-/r/ [=>]100.0%

      \[ wj + \frac{\color{blue}{\frac{1}{e^{wj}} \cdot x} - wj}{wj + 1} \]

      rec-exp [=>]100.0%

      \[ wj + \frac{\color{blue}{e^{-wj}} \cdot x - wj}{wj + 1} \]
    4. Taylor expanded in x around inf 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\frac{e^{-wj} \cdot x}{1 + wj}} \]

    if -1.29999999999999989e-4 < wj < 0.049000000000000002

    1. Initial program 79.0%

      \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
    2. Simplified79.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj + \frac{\frac{x}{e^{wj}} - wj}{wj + 1}} \]
      Step-by-step derivation

      [Start]79.0%

      \[ wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]

      sub-neg [=>]79.0%

      \[ \color{blue}{wj + \left(-\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)} \]

      div-sub [=>]79.0%

      \[ wj + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} - \frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)}\right) \]

      sub-neg [=>]79.0%

      \[ wj + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} + \left(-\frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)\right)}\right) \]

      +-commutative [=>]79.0%

      \[ wj + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right) + \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)}\right) \]

      distribute-neg-in [=>]79.0%

      \[ wj + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-\left(-\frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)\right) + \left(-\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)\right)} \]

      remove-double-neg [=>]79.0%

      \[ wj + \left(\color{blue}{\frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}} + \left(-\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)\right) \]

      sub-neg [<=]79.0%

      \[ wj + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)} \]

      div-sub [<=]79.0%

      \[ wj + \color{blue}{\frac{x - wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}} \]

      distribute-rgt1-in [=>]79.0%

      \[ wj + \frac{x - wj \cdot e^{wj}}{\color{blue}{\left(wj + 1\right) \cdot e^{wj}}} \]

      associate-/l/ [<=]79.0%

      \[ wj + \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{x - wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1}} \]
    3. Taylor expanded in wj around 0 99.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-1 \cdot \left(\left(0.6666666666666666 \cdot x + \left(-3 \cdot x + \left(1 + -2 \cdot \left(-4 \cdot x + 1.5 \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\right) \cdot {wj}^{3}\right) + \left(\left(1 - \left(-4 \cdot x + 1.5 \cdot x\right)\right) \cdot {wj}^{2} + \left(-2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right) + x\right)\right)} \]

    if 0.049000000000000002 < wj

    1. Initial program 0.0%

      \[wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]
    2. Simplified100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj + \frac{\frac{x}{e^{wj}} - wj}{wj + 1}} \]
      Step-by-step derivation

      [Start]0.0%

      \[ wj - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} \]

      sub-neg [=>]0.0%

      \[ \color{blue}{wj + \left(-\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj} - x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)} \]

      div-sub [=>]0.0%

      \[ wj + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} - \frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)}\right) \]

      sub-neg [=>]0.0%

      \[ wj + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} + \left(-\frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)\right)}\right) \]

      +-commutative [=>]0.0%

      \[ wj + \left(-\color{blue}{\left(\left(-\frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right) + \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)}\right) \]

      distribute-neg-in [=>]0.0%

      \[ wj + \color{blue}{\left(\left(-\left(-\frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)\right) + \left(-\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)\right)} \]

      remove-double-neg [=>]0.0%

      \[ wj + \left(\color{blue}{\frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}} + \left(-\frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)\right) \]

      sub-neg [<=]0.0%

      \[ wj + \color{blue}{\left(\frac{x}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}} - \frac{wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}\right)} \]

      div-sub [<=]0.0%

      \[ wj + \color{blue}{\frac{x - wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj} + wj \cdot e^{wj}}} \]

      distribute-rgt1-in [=>]0.0%

      \[ wj + \frac{x - wj \cdot e^{wj}}{\color{blue}{\left(wj + 1\right) \cdot e^{wj}}} \]

      associate-/l/ [<=]0.0%

      \[ wj + \color{blue}{\frac{\frac{x - wj \cdot e^{wj}}{e^{wj}}}{wj + 1}} \]
    3. Taylor expanded in x around 0 100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj - \frac{wj}{1 + wj}} \]
    4. Simplified100.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{wj - \frac{wj}{wj + 1}} \]
      Step-by-step derivation

      [Start]100.0%

      \[ wj - \frac{wj}{1 + wj} \]

      +-commutative [<=]100.0%

      \[ wj - \frac{wj}{\color{blue}{wj + 1}} \]
  3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification99.9%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;wj \leq -0.00013:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{e^{-wj} \cdot x}{wj + 1}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;wj \leq 0.049:\\ \;\;\;\;{wj}^{3} \cdot \left(\left(\left(-1 - -2 \cdot \left(x \cdot -4 + x \cdot 1.5\right)\right) - x \cdot -3\right) - x \cdot 0.6666666666666666\right) + \left(\left(1 - \left(x \cdot -4 + x \cdot 1.5\right)\right) \cdot {wj}^{2} + \left(x + -2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;wj - \frac{wj}{wj + 1}\\ \end{array} \]

Alternatives

Alternative 1
Accuracy99.3%
Cost15816
\[\begin{array}{l} t_0 := x \cdot -4 + x \cdot 1.5\\ \mathbf{if}\;wj \leq -0.00013:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{e^{-wj} \cdot x}{wj + 1}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;wj \leq 0.049:\\ \;\;\;\;{wj}^{3} \cdot \left(\left(\left(-1 - -2 \cdot t_0\right) - x \cdot -3\right) - x \cdot 0.6666666666666666\right) + \left(\left(1 - t_0\right) \cdot {wj}^{2} + \left(x + -2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right)\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;wj - \frac{wj}{wj + 1}\\ \end{array} \]
Alternative 2
Accuracy99.3%
Cost7368
\[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;wj \leq -9.8 \cdot 10^{-5}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{e^{-wj} \cdot x}{wj + 1}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;wj \leq 1.05 \cdot 10^{-8}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x + -2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right)\right) + \left(wj \cdot wj\right) \cdot \left(1 + x \cdot 2.5\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;wj + \frac{\frac{x}{e^{wj}} - wj}{wj + 1}\\ \end{array} \]
Alternative 3
Accuracy98.9%
Cost7044
\[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;wj \leq -4 \cdot 10^{-5}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{e^{-wj} \cdot x}{wj + 1}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;wj \leq 3 \cdot 10^{-7}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x + -2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right)\right) + \left(wj \cdot wj\right) \cdot \left(1 + x \cdot 2.5\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;wj - \frac{wj}{wj + 1}\\ \end{array} \]
Alternative 4
Accuracy98.9%
Cost6980
\[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;wj \leq -9.8 \cdot 10^{-5}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{\left(wj + 1\right) \cdot e^{wj}}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;wj \leq 3 \cdot 10^{-7}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x + -2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right)\right) + \left(wj \cdot wj\right) \cdot \left(1 + x \cdot 2.5\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;wj - \frac{wj}{wj + 1}\\ \end{array} \]
Alternative 5
Accuracy98.7%
Cost6852
\[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;wj \leq -1:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{wj \cdot e^{wj}}\\ \mathbf{elif}\;wj \leq 3 \cdot 10^{-7}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x + -2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right)\right) + \left(wj \cdot wj\right) \cdot \left(1 + x \cdot 2.5\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;wj - \frac{wj}{wj + 1}\\ \end{array} \]
Alternative 6
Accuracy82.7%
Cost1352
\[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;wj \leq -1:\\ \;\;\;\;wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(-wj\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;wj \leq 3 \cdot 10^{-7}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x + -2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right)\right) + \left(wj \cdot wj\right) \cdot \left(1 + x \cdot 2.5\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;wj - \frac{wj}{wj + 1}\\ \end{array} \]
Alternative 7
Accuracy82.7%
Cost968
\[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;wj \leq -1:\\ \;\;\;\;wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(-wj\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;wj \leq 3 \cdot 10^{-7}:\\ \;\;\;\;\left(x + -2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right)\right) + wj \cdot wj\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;wj - \frac{wj}{wj + 1}\\ \end{array} \]
Alternative 8
Accuracy76.8%
Cost712
\[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;wj \leq -0.6:\\ \;\;\;\;wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(-wj\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;wj \leq 0.91:\\ \;\;\;\;x + -2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;wj + -1\\ \end{array} \]
Alternative 9
Accuracy77.0%
Cost712
\[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;wj \leq -0.41:\\ \;\;\;\;wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(-wj\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;wj \leq 2.4 \cdot 10^{-11}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + -2 \cdot \left(wj \cdot x\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;wj - \frac{wj}{wj + 1}\\ \end{array} \]
Alternative 10
Accuracy77.0%
Cost712
\[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;wj \leq -2.25 \cdot 10^{+49}:\\ \;\;\;\;wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(-wj\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;wj \leq 2.3 \cdot 10^{-11}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x}{1 + wj \cdot 2}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;wj - \frac{wj}{wj + 1}\\ \end{array} \]
Alternative 11
Accuracy74.4%
Cost708
\[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;wj \leq 2.4 \cdot 10^{-11}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{x - wj \cdot x}{wj + 1}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;wj - \frac{wj}{wj + 1}\\ \end{array} \]
Alternative 12
Accuracy76.5%
Cost516
\[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;wj \leq -1.15:\\ \;\;\;\;wj \cdot \left(wj \cdot \left(-wj\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;wj \leq 3.5:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;wj + -1\\ \end{array} \]
Alternative 13
Accuracy74.3%
Cost456
\[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;wj \leq -9.5 \cdot 10^{-17}:\\ \;\;\;\;wj \cdot wj\\ \mathbf{elif}\;wj \leq 1.85:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;wj + -1\\ \end{array} \]
Alternative 14
Accuracy73.9%
Cost328
\[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;wj \leq -6.5 \cdot 10^{-18}:\\ \;\;\;\;wj \cdot wj\\ \mathbf{elif}\;wj \leq 2.4 \cdot 10^{-11}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;wj\\ \end{array} \]
Alternative 15
Accuracy67.4%
Cost196
\[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;wj \leq 2.4 \cdot 10^{-11}:\\ \;\;\;\;x\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;wj\\ \end{array} \]
Alternative 16
Accuracy2.4%
Cost64
\[-512 \]
Alternative 17
Accuracy2.8%
Cost64
\[0 \]
Alternative 18
Accuracy3.8%
Cost64
\[0.5 \]
Alternative 19
Accuracy3.8%
Cost64
\[19683 \]
Alternative 20
Accuracy26.9%
Cost64
\[wj \]

Reproduce?

herbie shell --seed 2023272 
(FPCore (wj x)
  :name "Jmat.Real.lambertw, newton loop step"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (- wj (- (/ wj (+ wj 1.0)) (/ x (+ (exp wj) (* wj (exp wj))))))

  (- wj (/ (- (* wj (exp wj)) x) (+ (exp wj) (* wj (exp wj))))))