VandenBroeck and Keller, Equation (20)

?

Percentage Accurate: 3.5% → 99.4%
Time: 20.6s
Precision: binary64
Cost: 130564

?

\[-\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} - e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}\right) \]
\[\begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f\\ \mathbf{if}\;t_0 \leq 200:\\ \;\;\;\;\log \left(\frac{e^{t_0} + e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot \left(-f\right)}}{\mathsf{fma}\left({f}^{5}, {\pi}^{5} \cdot 1.6276041666666666 \cdot 10^{-5}, \mathsf{fma}\left(\pi \cdot 0.5, f, \mathsf{fma}\left({f}^{7}, {\pi}^{7} \cdot 2.422030009920635 \cdot 10^{-8}, \left({\pi}^{3} \cdot 0.005208333333333333\right) \cdot {f}^{3}\right)\right)\right)}\right) \cdot \frac{-1}{\frac{\pi}{4}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot 0\\ \end{array} \]
(FPCore (f)
 :precision binary64
 (-
  (*
   (/ 1.0 (/ PI 4.0))
   (log
    (/
     (+ (exp (* (/ PI 4.0) f)) (exp (- (* (/ PI 4.0) f))))
     (- (exp (* (/ PI 4.0) f)) (exp (- (* (/ PI 4.0) f)))))))))
(FPCore (f)
 :precision binary64
 (let* ((t_0 (* (/ PI 4.0) f)))
   (if (<= t_0 200.0)
     (*
      (log
       (/
        (+ (exp t_0) (exp (* (/ PI 4.0) (- f))))
        (fma
         (pow f 5.0)
         (* (pow PI 5.0) 1.6276041666666666e-5)
         (fma
          (* PI 0.5)
          f
          (fma
           (pow f 7.0)
           (* (pow PI 7.0) 2.422030009920635e-8)
           (* (* (pow PI 3.0) 0.005208333333333333) (pow f 3.0)))))))
      (/ -1.0 (/ PI 4.0)))
     (* (/ 1.0 (/ PI 4.0)) 0.0))))
double code(double f) {
	return -((1.0 / (((double) M_PI) / 4.0)) * log(((exp(((((double) M_PI) / 4.0) * f)) + exp(-((((double) M_PI) / 4.0) * f))) / (exp(((((double) M_PI) / 4.0) * f)) - exp(-((((double) M_PI) / 4.0) * f))))));
}
double code(double f) {
	double t_0 = (((double) M_PI) / 4.0) * f;
	double tmp;
	if (t_0 <= 200.0) {
		tmp = log(((exp(t_0) + exp(((((double) M_PI) / 4.0) * -f))) / fma(pow(f, 5.0), (pow(((double) M_PI), 5.0) * 1.6276041666666666e-5), fma((((double) M_PI) * 0.5), f, fma(pow(f, 7.0), (pow(((double) M_PI), 7.0) * 2.422030009920635e-8), ((pow(((double) M_PI), 3.0) * 0.005208333333333333) * pow(f, 3.0))))))) * (-1.0 / (((double) M_PI) / 4.0));
	} else {
		tmp = (1.0 / (((double) M_PI) / 4.0)) * 0.0;
	}
	return tmp;
}
function code(f)
	return Float64(-Float64(Float64(1.0 / Float64(pi / 4.0)) * log(Float64(Float64(exp(Float64(Float64(pi / 4.0) * f)) + exp(Float64(-Float64(Float64(pi / 4.0) * f)))) / Float64(exp(Float64(Float64(pi / 4.0) * f)) - exp(Float64(-Float64(Float64(pi / 4.0) * f))))))))
end
function code(f)
	t_0 = Float64(Float64(pi / 4.0) * f)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (t_0 <= 200.0)
		tmp = Float64(log(Float64(Float64(exp(t_0) + exp(Float64(Float64(pi / 4.0) * Float64(-f)))) / fma((f ^ 5.0), Float64((pi ^ 5.0) * 1.6276041666666666e-5), fma(Float64(pi * 0.5), f, fma((f ^ 7.0), Float64((pi ^ 7.0) * 2.422030009920635e-8), Float64(Float64((pi ^ 3.0) * 0.005208333333333333) * (f ^ 3.0))))))) * Float64(-1.0 / Float64(pi / 4.0)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(Float64(1.0 / Float64(pi / 4.0)) * 0.0);
	end
	return tmp
end
code[f_] := (-N[(N[(1.0 / N[(Pi / 4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * N[Log[N[(N[(N[Exp[N[(N[(Pi / 4.0), $MachinePrecision] * f), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] + N[Exp[(-N[(N[(Pi / 4.0), $MachinePrecision] * f), $MachinePrecision])], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Exp[N[(N[(Pi / 4.0), $MachinePrecision] * f), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] - N[Exp[(-N[(N[(Pi / 4.0), $MachinePrecision] * f), $MachinePrecision])], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision])
code[f_] := Block[{t$95$0 = N[(N[(Pi / 4.0), $MachinePrecision] * f), $MachinePrecision]}, If[LessEqual[t$95$0, 200.0], N[(N[Log[N[(N[(N[Exp[t$95$0], $MachinePrecision] + N[Exp[N[(N[(Pi / 4.0), $MachinePrecision] * (-f)), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] / N[(N[Power[f, 5.0], $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Power[Pi, 5.0], $MachinePrecision] * 1.6276041666666666e-5), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(Pi * 0.5), $MachinePrecision] * f + N[(N[Power[f, 7.0], $MachinePrecision] * N[(N[Power[Pi, 7.0], $MachinePrecision] * 2.422030009920635e-8), $MachinePrecision] + N[(N[(N[Power[Pi, 3.0], $MachinePrecision] * 0.005208333333333333), $MachinePrecision] * N[Power[f, 3.0], $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]], $MachinePrecision] * N[(-1.0 / N[(Pi / 4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(N[(1.0 / N[(Pi / 4.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision] * 0.0), $MachinePrecision]]]
-\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} - e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}\right)
\begin{array}{l}
t_0 := \frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f\\
\mathbf{if}\;t_0 \leq 200:\\
\;\;\;\;\log \left(\frac{e^{t_0} + e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot \left(-f\right)}}{\mathsf{fma}\left({f}^{5}, {\pi}^{5} \cdot 1.6276041666666666 \cdot 10^{-5}, \mathsf{fma}\left(\pi \cdot 0.5, f, \mathsf{fma}\left({f}^{7}, {\pi}^{7} \cdot 2.422030009920635 \cdot 10^{-8}, \left({\pi}^{3} \cdot 0.005208333333333333\right) \cdot {f}^{3}\right)\right)\right)}\right) \cdot \frac{-1}{\frac{\pi}{4}}\\

\mathbf{else}:\\
\;\;\;\;\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot 0\\


\end{array}

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Herbie found 8 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup

Accuracy vs Speed

The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Bogosity?

Bogosity

Derivation?

  1. Split input into 2 regimes
  2. if (*.f64 (/.f64 (PI.f64) 4) f) < 200

    1. Initial program 6.6%

      \[-\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} - e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}\right) \]
    2. Taylor expanded in f around 0 98.1%

      \[\leadsto -\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{\color{blue}{{f}^{5} \cdot \left(8.138020833333333 \cdot 10^{-6} \cdot {\pi}^{5} - -8.138020833333333 \cdot 10^{-6} \cdot {\pi}^{5}\right) + \left(\left(0.25 \cdot \pi - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) \cdot f + \left({f}^{3} \cdot \left(0.0026041666666666665 \cdot {\pi}^{3} - -0.0026041666666666665 \cdot {\pi}^{3}\right) + {f}^{7} \cdot \left(1.2110150049603175 \cdot 10^{-8} \cdot {\pi}^{7} - -1.2110150049603175 \cdot 10^{-8} \cdot {\pi}^{7}\right)\right)\right)}}\right) \]
    3. Simplified98.1%

      \[\leadsto -\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left({f}^{5}, {\pi}^{5} \cdot 1.6276041666666666 \cdot 10^{-5}, \mathsf{fma}\left(\pi \cdot 0.5, f, \mathsf{fma}\left({f}^{7}, {\pi}^{7} \cdot 2.422030009920635 \cdot 10^{-8}, \left({\pi}^{3} \cdot 0.005208333333333333\right) \cdot {f}^{3}\right)\right)\right)}}\right) \]
      Step-by-step derivation

      [Start]98.1%

      \[ -\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{{f}^{5} \cdot \left(8.138020833333333 \cdot 10^{-6} \cdot {\pi}^{5} - -8.138020833333333 \cdot 10^{-6} \cdot {\pi}^{5}\right) + \left(\left(0.25 \cdot \pi - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) \cdot f + \left({f}^{3} \cdot \left(0.0026041666666666665 \cdot {\pi}^{3} - -0.0026041666666666665 \cdot {\pi}^{3}\right) + {f}^{7} \cdot \left(1.2110150049603175 \cdot 10^{-8} \cdot {\pi}^{7} - -1.2110150049603175 \cdot 10^{-8} \cdot {\pi}^{7}\right)\right)\right)}\right) \]

      fma-def [=>]98.1%

      \[ -\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left({f}^{5}, 8.138020833333333 \cdot 10^{-6} \cdot {\pi}^{5} - -8.138020833333333 \cdot 10^{-6} \cdot {\pi}^{5}, \left(0.25 \cdot \pi - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) \cdot f + \left({f}^{3} \cdot \left(0.0026041666666666665 \cdot {\pi}^{3} - -0.0026041666666666665 \cdot {\pi}^{3}\right) + {f}^{7} \cdot \left(1.2110150049603175 \cdot 10^{-8} \cdot {\pi}^{7} - -1.2110150049603175 \cdot 10^{-8} \cdot {\pi}^{7}\right)\right)\right)}}\right) \]

      distribute-rgt-out-- [=>]98.1%

      \[ -\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{\mathsf{fma}\left({f}^{5}, \color{blue}{{\pi}^{5} \cdot \left(8.138020833333333 \cdot 10^{-6} - -8.138020833333333 \cdot 10^{-6}\right)}, \left(0.25 \cdot \pi - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) \cdot f + \left({f}^{3} \cdot \left(0.0026041666666666665 \cdot {\pi}^{3} - -0.0026041666666666665 \cdot {\pi}^{3}\right) + {f}^{7} \cdot \left(1.2110150049603175 \cdot 10^{-8} \cdot {\pi}^{7} - -1.2110150049603175 \cdot 10^{-8} \cdot {\pi}^{7}\right)\right)\right)}\right) \]

      metadata-eval [=>]98.1%

      \[ -\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{\mathsf{fma}\left({f}^{5}, {\pi}^{5} \cdot \color{blue}{1.6276041666666666 \cdot 10^{-5}}, \left(0.25 \cdot \pi - -0.25 \cdot \pi\right) \cdot f + \left({f}^{3} \cdot \left(0.0026041666666666665 \cdot {\pi}^{3} - -0.0026041666666666665 \cdot {\pi}^{3}\right) + {f}^{7} \cdot \left(1.2110150049603175 \cdot 10^{-8} \cdot {\pi}^{7} - -1.2110150049603175 \cdot 10^{-8} \cdot {\pi}^{7}\right)\right)\right)}\right) \]

      fma-def [=>]98.1%

      \[ -\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{\mathsf{fma}\left({f}^{5}, {\pi}^{5} \cdot 1.6276041666666666 \cdot 10^{-5}, \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(0.25 \cdot \pi - -0.25 \cdot \pi, f, {f}^{3} \cdot \left(0.0026041666666666665 \cdot {\pi}^{3} - -0.0026041666666666665 \cdot {\pi}^{3}\right) + {f}^{7} \cdot \left(1.2110150049603175 \cdot 10^{-8} \cdot {\pi}^{7} - -1.2110150049603175 \cdot 10^{-8} \cdot {\pi}^{7}\right)\right)}\right)}\right) \]

      distribute-rgt-out-- [=>]98.1%

      \[ -\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{\mathsf{fma}\left({f}^{5}, {\pi}^{5} \cdot 1.6276041666666666 \cdot 10^{-5}, \mathsf{fma}\left(\color{blue}{\pi \cdot \left(0.25 - -0.25\right)}, f, {f}^{3} \cdot \left(0.0026041666666666665 \cdot {\pi}^{3} - -0.0026041666666666665 \cdot {\pi}^{3}\right) + {f}^{7} \cdot \left(1.2110150049603175 \cdot 10^{-8} \cdot {\pi}^{7} - -1.2110150049603175 \cdot 10^{-8} \cdot {\pi}^{7}\right)\right)\right)}\right) \]

      metadata-eval [=>]98.1%

      \[ -\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{\mathsf{fma}\left({f}^{5}, {\pi}^{5} \cdot 1.6276041666666666 \cdot 10^{-5}, \mathsf{fma}\left(\pi \cdot \color{blue}{0.5}, f, {f}^{3} \cdot \left(0.0026041666666666665 \cdot {\pi}^{3} - -0.0026041666666666665 \cdot {\pi}^{3}\right) + {f}^{7} \cdot \left(1.2110150049603175 \cdot 10^{-8} \cdot {\pi}^{7} - -1.2110150049603175 \cdot 10^{-8} \cdot {\pi}^{7}\right)\right)\right)}\right) \]

    if 200 < (*.f64 (/.f64 (PI.f64) 4) f)

    1. Initial program 0.7%

      \[-\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} - e^{-\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f}}\right) \]
    2. Applied egg-rr100.0%

      \[\leadsto -\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot \log \color{blue}{1} \]
  3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.
  4. Final simplification99.2%

    \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f \leq 200:\\ \;\;\;\;\log \left(\frac{e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f} + e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot \left(-f\right)}}{\mathsf{fma}\left({f}^{5}, {\pi}^{5} \cdot 1.6276041666666666 \cdot 10^{-5}, \mathsf{fma}\left(\pi \cdot 0.5, f, \mathsf{fma}\left({f}^{7}, {\pi}^{7} \cdot 2.422030009920635 \cdot 10^{-8}, \left({\pi}^{3} \cdot 0.005208333333333333\right) \cdot {f}^{3}\right)\right)\right)}\right) \cdot \frac{-1}{\frac{\pi}{4}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot 0\\ \end{array} \]

Alternatives

Alternative 1
Accuracy99.4%
Cost130564
\[\begin{array}{l} t_0 := \frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f\\ \mathbf{if}\;t_0 \leq 200:\\ \;\;\;\;\log \left(\frac{e^{t_0} + e^{\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot \left(-f\right)}}{\mathsf{fma}\left({f}^{5}, {\pi}^{5} \cdot 1.6276041666666666 \cdot 10^{-5}, \mathsf{fma}\left(\pi \cdot 0.5, f, \mathsf{fma}\left({f}^{7}, {\pi}^{7} \cdot 2.422030009920635 \cdot 10^{-8}, \left({\pi}^{3} \cdot 0.005208333333333333\right) \cdot {f}^{3}\right)\right)\right)}\right) \cdot \frac{-1}{\frac{\pi}{4}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot 0\\ \end{array} \]
Alternative 2
Accuracy99.2%
Cost39428
\[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;\frac{\pi}{4} \cdot f \leq 200:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{-\log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(f, \pi \cdot 0.08333333333333333, \frac{\frac{4}{f}}{\pi}\right)\right)}{\pi \cdot 0.25}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot 0\\ \end{array} \]
Alternative 3
Accuracy99.2%
Cost32836
\[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;f \leq 225:\\ \;\;\;\;\log \left(\mathsf{fma}\left(f, \pi \cdot 0.08333333333333333, \frac{\frac{4}{f}}{\pi}\right)\right) \cdot \frac{-4}{\pi}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot 0\\ \end{array} \]
Alternative 4
Accuracy99.2%
Cost26884
\[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;f \leq 225:\\ \;\;\;\;\log \left(\left(\frac{\frac{4}{f}}{\pi} + \left(1 + f \cdot \left(\pi \cdot 0.08333333333333333\right)\right)\right) + -1\right) \cdot \frac{-1}{\frac{\pi}{4}}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot 0\\ \end{array} \]
Alternative 5
Accuracy98.9%
Cost19844
\[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;f \leq 1.3:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{4}{\pi} \cdot \left(-\log \left(\frac{\frac{4}{f}}{\pi}\right)\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot 0\\ \end{array} \]
Alternative 6
Accuracy99.0%
Cost19844
\[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;f \leq 1.3:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{\log \left(\frac{4}{\pi \cdot f}\right) \cdot \left(-4\right)}{\pi}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot 0\\ \end{array} \]
Alternative 7
Accuracy58.1%
Cost13252
\[\begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;f \leq 225:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{4 \cdot \left(-\log 262144\right)}{\pi}\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;\frac{1}{\frac{\pi}{4}} \cdot 0\\ \end{array} \]
Alternative 8
Accuracy9.3%
Cost13120
\[\frac{4 \cdot \left(-\log 262144\right)}{\pi} \]

Reproduce?

herbie shell --seed 2023271 
(FPCore (f)
  :name "VandenBroeck and Keller, Equation (20)"
  :precision binary64
  (- (* (/ 1.0 (/ PI 4.0)) (log (/ (+ (exp (* (/ PI 4.0) f)) (exp (- (* (/ PI 4.0) f)))) (- (exp (* (/ PI 4.0) f)) (exp (- (* (/ PI 4.0) f)))))))))