Data.Colour.RGBSpace.HSL:hsl from colour-2.3.3, E

Percentage Accurate: 99.6% → 99.6%

Time: 3.8s

Alternatives: 6

Speedup: 1.0×

• 21.5% of points produce a very large (infinite) output. You may want to add a precondition.

Specification

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(\left(y - x\right) \cdot 6\right) \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* (* (- y x) 6.0) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (((y - x) * 6.0) * z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (((y - x) * 6.0d0) * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (((y - x) * 6.0) * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (((y - x) * 6.0) * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(Float64(y - x) * 6.0) * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (((y - x) * 6.0) * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(N[(N[(y - x), $MachinePrecision] * 6.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Initial Program: 99.6% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(\left(y - x\right) \cdot 6\right) \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* (* (- y x) 6.0) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (((y - x) * 6.0) * z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (((y - x) * 6.0d0) * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (((y - x) * 6.0) * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (((y - x) * 6.0) * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(Float64(y - x) * 6.0) * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (((y - x) * 6.0) * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(N[(N[(y - x), $MachinePrecision] * 6.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Alternative 1: 99.6% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + \left(\left(y - x\right) \cdot 6\right) \cdot z \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* (* (- y x) 6.0) z)))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (((y - x) * 6.0) * z);
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + (((y - x) * 6.0d0) * z)
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (((y - x) * 6.0) * z);
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (((y - x) * 6.0) * z)

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(Float64(Float64(y - x) * 6.0) * z))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (((y - x) * 6.0) * z);
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(N[(N[(y - x), $MachinePrecision] * 6.0), $MachinePrecision] * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[x + \left(\left(y - x\right) \cdot 6\right) \cdot z \]

2. Final simplification 99.8%

   \[\leadsto x + \left(\left(y - x\right) \cdot 6\right) \cdot z \]

Alternative 2: 86.9% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -9.2 \cdot 10^{+45} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 8 \cdot 10^{+46}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + -6 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + 6 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -9.2e+45) (not (<= x 8e+46)))
   (+ x (* -6.0 (* x z)))
   (+ x (* 6.0 (* y z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -9.2e+45) || !(x <= 8e+46)) {
		tmp = x + (-6.0 * (x * z));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (6.0 * (y * z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-9.2d+45)) .or. (.not. (x <= 8d+46))) then
        tmp = x + ((-6.0d0) * (x * z))
    else
        tmp = x + (6.0d0 * (y * z))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -9.2e+45) || !(x <= 8e+46)) {
		tmp = x + (-6.0 * (x * z));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (6.0 * (y * z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -9.2e+45) or not (x <= 8e+46):
		tmp = x + (-6.0 * (x * z))
	else:
		tmp = x + (6.0 * (y * z))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -9.2e+45) || !(x <= 8e+46))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(-6.0 * Float64(x * z)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(6.0 * Float64(y * z)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -9.2e+45) || ~((x <= 8e+46)))
		tmp = x + (-6.0 * (x * z));
	else
		tmp = x + (6.0 * (y * z));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -9.2e+45], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 8e+46]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(-6.0 * N[(x * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(6.0 * N[(y * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -9.20000000000000049e45 or 7.9999999999999999e46 < x

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x + \left(\left(y - x\right) \cdot 6\right) \cdot z \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around 0 94.4%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{-6 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)} \]

   if -9.20000000000000049e45 < x < 7.9999999999999999e46

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[x + \left(\left(y - x\right) \cdot 6\right) \cdot z \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around inf 86.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{6 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
   3. Step-by-step derivation

      1. *-commutative 86.6%

         \[\leadsto x + 6 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(z \cdot y\right)} \]

   4. Simplified 86.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{6 \cdot \left(z \cdot y\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 89.9%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -9.2 \cdot 10^{+45} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 8 \cdot 10^{+46}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + -6 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + 6 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 3: 86.9% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.12 \cdot 10^{+44} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 9 \cdot 10^{+45}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + -6 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(6 \cdot z\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (or (<= x -1.12e+44) (not (<= x 9e+45)))
   (+ x (* -6.0 (* x z)))
   (+ x (* y (* 6.0 z)))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.12e+44) || !(x <= 9e+45)) {
		tmp = x + (-6.0 * (x * z));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * (6.0 * z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if ((x <= (-1.12d+44)) .or. (.not. (x <= 9d+45))) then
        tmp = x + ((-6.0d0) * (x * z))
    else
        tmp = x + (y * (6.0d0 * z))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if ((x <= -1.12e+44) || !(x <= 9e+45)) {
		tmp = x + (-6.0 * (x * z));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (y * (6.0 * z));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if (x <= -1.12e+44) or not (x <= 9e+45):
		tmp = x + (-6.0 * (x * z))
	else:
		tmp = x + (y * (6.0 * z))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if ((x <= -1.12e+44) || !(x <= 9e+45))
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(-6.0 * Float64(x * z)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(6.0 * z)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if ((x <= -1.12e+44) || ~((x <= 9e+45)))
		tmp = x + (-6.0 * (x * z));
	else
		tmp = x + (y * (6.0 * z));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[Or[LessEqual[x, -1.12e+44], N[Not[LessEqual[x, 9e+45]], $MachinePrecision]], N[(x + N[(-6.0 * N[(x * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(y * N[(6.0 * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 2 regimes

2. if x < -1.12000000000000008e44 or 8.9999999999999997e45 < x

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x + \left(\left(y - x\right) \cdot 6\right) \cdot z \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around 0 94.4%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{-6 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)} \]

   if -1.12000000000000008e44 < x < 8.9999999999999997e45

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[x + \left(\left(y - x\right) \cdot 6\right) \cdot z \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around inf 86.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(6 \cdot y\right)} \cdot z \]

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 86.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{6 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 86.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(6 \cdot y\right) \cdot z} \]

      2. *-commutative 86.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 6\right)} \cdot z \]

      3. associate-*r* 86.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(6 \cdot z\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 86.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(6 \cdot z\right)} \]
3. Recombined 2 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 90.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.12 \cdot 10^{+44} \lor \neg \left(x \leq 9 \cdot 10^{+45}\right):\\ \;\;\;\;x + -6 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(6 \cdot z\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 4: 86.9% accurate, 0.8× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.06 \cdot 10^{+45}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + -6 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 9 \cdot 10^{+47}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(6 \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(x \cdot -6\right)\\ \end{array} \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z)
 :precision binary64
 (if (<= x -1.06e+45)
   (+ x (* -6.0 (* x z)))
   (if (<= x 9e+47) (+ x (* y (* 6.0 z))) (+ x (* z (* x -6.0))))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.06e+45) {
		tmp = x + (-6.0 * (x * z));
	} else if (x <= 9e+47) {
		tmp = x + (y * (6.0 * z));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (x * -6.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    real(8) :: tmp
    if (x <= (-1.06d+45)) then
        tmp = x + ((-6.0d0) * (x * z))
    else if (x <= 9d+47) then
        tmp = x + (y * (6.0d0 * z))
    else
        tmp = x + (z * (x * (-6.0d0)))
    end if
    code = tmp
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	double tmp;
	if (x <= -1.06e+45) {
		tmp = x + (-6.0 * (x * z));
	} else if (x <= 9e+47) {
		tmp = x + (y * (6.0 * z));
	} else {
		tmp = x + (z * (x * -6.0));
	}
	return tmp;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	tmp = 0
	if x <= -1.06e+45:
		tmp = x + (-6.0 * (x * z))
	elif x <= 9e+47:
		tmp = x + (y * (6.0 * z))
	else:
		tmp = x + (z * (x * -6.0))
	return tmp

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0
	if (x <= -1.06e+45)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(-6.0 * Float64(x * z)));
	elseif (x <= 9e+47)
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(y * Float64(6.0 * z)));
	else
		tmp = Float64(x + Float64(z * Float64(x * -6.0)));
	end
	return tmp
end

MATLAB

function tmp_2 = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = 0.0;
	if (x <= -1.06e+45)
		tmp = x + (-6.0 * (x * z));
	elseif (x <= 9e+47)
		tmp = x + (y * (6.0 * z));
	else
		tmp = x + (z * (x * -6.0));
	end
	tmp_2 = tmp;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := If[LessEqual[x, -1.06e+45], N[(x + N[(-6.0 * N[(x * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], If[LessEqual[x, 9e+47], N[(x + N[(y * N[(6.0 * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision], N[(x + N[(z * N[(x * -6.0), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]]]

Derivation

1. Split input into 3 regimes

2. if x < -1.06e45

   1. Initial program 99.9%

      \[x + \left(\left(y - x\right) \cdot 6\right) \cdot z \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around 0 91.0%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{-6 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)} \]

   if -1.06e45 < x < 8.99999999999999958e47

   1. Initial program 99.7%

      \[x + \left(\left(y - x\right) \cdot 6\right) \cdot z \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around inf 86.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(6 \cdot y\right)} \cdot z \]

   3. Taylor expanded in y around 0 86.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{6 \cdot \left(y \cdot z\right)} \]
   4. Step-by-step derivation

      1. associate-*r* 86.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(6 \cdot y\right) \cdot z} \]

      2. *-commutative 86.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(y \cdot 6\right)} \cdot z \]

      3. associate-*r* 86.6%

         \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(6 \cdot z\right)} \]

   5. Simplified 86.6%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{y \cdot \left(6 \cdot z\right)} \]

   if 8.99999999999999958e47 < x

   1. Initial program 100.0%

      \[x + \left(\left(y - x\right) \cdot 6\right) \cdot z \]

   2. Taylor expanded in y around 0 97.9%

      \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{\left(-6 \cdot x\right)} \cdot z \]
3. Recombined 3 regimes into one program.

4. Final simplification 90.0%

   \[\leadsto \begin{array}{l} \mathbf{if}\;x \leq -1.06 \cdot 10^{+45}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + -6 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{elif}\;x \leq 9 \cdot 10^{+47}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + y \cdot \left(6 \cdot z\right)\\ \mathbf{else}:\\ \;\;\;\;x + z \cdot \left(x \cdot -6\right)\\ \end{array} \]

Alternative 5: 62.7% accurate, 1.3× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x + -6 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (+ x (* -6.0 (* x z))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (-6.0 * (x * z));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x + ((-6.0d0) * (x * z))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x + (-6.0 * (x * z));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x + (-6.0 * (x * z))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x + Float64(-6.0 * Float64(x * z)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x + (-6.0 * (x * z));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x + N[(-6.0 * N[(x * z), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[x + \left(\left(y - x\right) \cdot 6\right) \cdot z \]

2. Taylor expanded in y around 0 63.9%

   \[\leadsto x + \color{blue}{-6 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right)} \]

3. Final simplification 63.9%

   \[\leadsto x + -6 \cdot \left(x \cdot z\right) \]

Alternative 6: 36.6% accurate, 9.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 x)

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x;
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return x
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x;
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := x

Derivation

1. Initial program 99.8%

   \[x + \left(\left(y - x\right) \cdot 6\right) \cdot z \]

2. Taylor expanded in z around 0 37.6%

   \[\leadsto \color{blue}{x} \]

3. Final simplification 37.6%

   \[\leadsto x \]

Developer target: 99.8% accurate, 1.0× speedup

Math

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ x - \left(6 \cdot z\right) \cdot \left(x - y\right) \end{array} \]

FPCore

(FPCore (x y z) :precision binary64 (- x (* (* 6.0 z) (- x y))))

C

double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x - ((6.0 * z) * (x - y));
}

Fortran

real(8) function code(x, y, z)
    real(8), intent (in) :: x
    real(8), intent (in) :: y
    real(8), intent (in) :: z
    code = x - ((6.0d0 * z) * (x - y))
end function

Java

public static double code(double x, double y, double z) {
	return x - ((6.0 * z) * (x - y));
}

Python

def code(x, y, z):
	return x - ((6.0 * z) * (x - y))

Julia

function code(x, y, z)
	return Float64(x - Float64(Float64(6.0 * z) * Float64(x - y)))
end

MATLAB

function tmp = code(x, y, z)
	tmp = x - ((6.0 * z) * (x - y));
end

Wolfram

code[x_, y_, z_] := N[(x - N[(N[(6.0 * z), $MachinePrecision] * N[(x - y), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]), $MachinePrecision]

Reproduce

herbie shell --seed 2023271 
(FPCore (x y z)
  :name "Data.Colour.RGBSpace.HSL:hsl from colour-2.3.3, E"
  :precision binary64

  :herbie-target
  (- x (* (* 6.0 z) (- x y)))

  (+ x (* (* (- y x) 6.0) z)))