Disney BSSRDF, sample scattering profile, lower

Percentage Accurate: 61.3% → 99.3%
Time: 9.1s
Alternatives: 6
Speedup: 21.8×

Specification

?
\[\left(0 \leq s \land s \leq 256\right) \land \left(2.328306437 \cdot 10^{-10} \leq u \land u \leq 0.25\right)\]
\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{1 - 4 \cdot u}\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (s u) :precision binary32 (* s (log (/ 1.0 (- 1.0 (* 4.0 u))))))
float code(float s, float u) {
	return s * logf((1.0f / (1.0f - (4.0f * u))));
}
real(4) function code(s, u)
    real(4), intent (in) :: s
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    code = s * log((1.0e0 / (1.0e0 - (4.0e0 * u))))
end function
function code(s, u)
	return Float32(s * log(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) - Float32(Float32(4.0) * u)))))
end
function tmp = code(s, u)
	tmp = s * log((single(1.0) / (single(1.0) - (single(4.0) * u))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{1 - 4 \cdot u}\right)
\end{array}

Sampling outcomes in binary32 precision:

Local Percentage Accuracy vs ?

The average percentage accuracy by input value. Horizontal axis shows value of an input variable; the variable is choosen in the title. Vertical axis is accuracy; higher is better. Red represent the original program, while blue represents Herbie's suggestion. These can be toggled with buttons below the plot. The line is an average while dots represent individual samples.

Accuracy vs Speed?

Herbie found 6 alternatives:

AlternativeAccuracySpeedup
The accuracy (vertical axis) and speed (horizontal axis) of each alternatives. Up and to the right is better. The red square shows the initial program, and each blue circle shows an alternative.The line shows the best available speed-accuracy tradeoffs.

Initial Program: 61.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{1 - 4 \cdot u}\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (s u) :precision binary32 (* s (log (/ 1.0 (- 1.0 (* 4.0 u))))))
float code(float s, float u) {
	return s * logf((1.0f / (1.0f - (4.0f * u))));
}
real(4) function code(s, u)
    real(4), intent (in) :: s
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    code = s * log((1.0e0 / (1.0e0 - (4.0e0 * u))))
end function
function code(s, u)
	return Float32(s * log(Float32(Float32(1.0) / Float32(Float32(1.0) - Float32(Float32(4.0) * u)))))
end
function tmp = code(s, u)
	tmp = s * log((single(1.0) / (single(1.0) - (single(4.0) * u))));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{1 - 4 \cdot u}\right)
\end{array}

Alternative 1: 99.3% accurate, 1.0× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ \mathsf{log1p}\left(u \cdot -4\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (s u) :precision binary32 (* (log1p (* u -4.0)) (- s)))
float code(float s, float u) {
	return log1pf((u * -4.0f)) * -s;
}
function code(s, u)
	return Float32(log1p(Float32(u * Float32(-4.0))) * Float32(-s))
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
\mathsf{log1p}\left(u \cdot -4\right) \cdot \left(-s\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 59.5%

    \[s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{1 - 4 \cdot u}\right) \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-commutative59.5%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(\frac{1}{1 - 4 \cdot u}\right) \cdot s} \]
    2. log-rec62.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(-\log \left(1 - 4 \cdot u\right)\right)} \cdot s \]
    3. distribute-lft-neg-out62.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{-\log \left(1 - 4 \cdot u\right) \cdot s} \]
    4. distribute-rgt-neg-in62.3%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\log \left(1 - 4 \cdot u\right) \cdot \left(-s\right)} \]
    5. sub-neg62.3%

      \[\leadsto \log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-4 \cdot u\right)\right)} \cdot \left(-s\right) \]
    6. log1p-def99.4%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-4 \cdot u\right)} \cdot \left(-s\right) \]
    7. *-commutative99.4%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{log1p}\left(-\color{blue}{u \cdot 4}\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \]
    8. distribute-rgt-neg-in99.4%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{u \cdot \left(-4\right)}\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \]
    9. metadata-eval99.4%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{log1p}\left(u \cdot \color{blue}{-4}\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \]
  3. Simplified99.4%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(u \cdot -4\right) \cdot \left(-s\right)} \]
  4. Final simplification99.4%

    \[\leadsto \mathsf{log1p}\left(u \cdot -4\right) \cdot \left(-s\right) \]

Alternative 2: 87.0% accurate, 9.9× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(u \cdot 8\right) + u \cdot 4\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (s u) :precision binary32 (* s (+ (* u (* u 8.0)) (* u 4.0))))
float code(float s, float u) {
	return s * ((u * (u * 8.0f)) + (u * 4.0f));
}
real(4) function code(s, u)
    real(4), intent (in) :: s
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    code = s * ((u * (u * 8.0e0)) + (u * 4.0e0))
end function
function code(s, u)
	return Float32(s * Float32(Float32(u * Float32(u * Float32(8.0))) + Float32(u * Float32(4.0))))
end
function tmp = code(s, u)
	tmp = s * ((u * (u * single(8.0))) + (u * single(4.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(u \cdot 8\right) + u \cdot 4\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 59.5%

    \[s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{1 - 4 \cdot u}\right) \]
  2. Taylor expanded in u around 0 92.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(8 \cdot {u}^{2} + \left(21.333333333333332 \cdot {u}^{3} + 4 \cdot u\right)\right)} \]
  3. Step-by-step derivation
    1. associate-+r+92.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\left(8 \cdot {u}^{2} + 21.333333333333332 \cdot {u}^{3}\right) + 4 \cdot u\right)} \]
    2. distribute-rgt-in92.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(8 \cdot {u}^{2} + 21.333333333333332 \cdot {u}^{3}\right) \cdot s + \left(4 \cdot u\right) \cdot s} \]
    3. fma-def92.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(8, {u}^{2}, 21.333333333333332 \cdot {u}^{3}\right)} \cdot s + \left(4 \cdot u\right) \cdot s \]
    4. unpow292.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(8, \color{blue}{u \cdot u}, 21.333333333333332 \cdot {u}^{3}\right) \cdot s + \left(4 \cdot u\right) \cdot s \]
    5. *-commutative92.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(8, u \cdot u, \color{blue}{{u}^{3} \cdot 21.333333333333332}\right) \cdot s + \left(4 \cdot u\right) \cdot s \]
    6. *-commutative92.0%

      \[\leadsto \mathsf{fma}\left(8, u \cdot u, {u}^{3} \cdot 21.333333333333332\right) \cdot s + \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot 4\right)} \cdot s \]
  4. Applied egg-rr92.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(8, u \cdot u, {u}^{3} \cdot 21.333333333333332\right) \cdot s + \left(u \cdot 4\right) \cdot s} \]
  5. Taylor expanded in u around 0 87.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(8 \cdot {u}^{2}\right)} \cdot s + \left(u \cdot 4\right) \cdot s \]
  6. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-commutative87.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left({u}^{2} \cdot 8\right)} \cdot s + \left(u \cdot 4\right) \cdot s \]
    2. unpow287.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(\color{blue}{\left(u \cdot u\right)} \cdot 8\right) \cdot s + \left(u \cdot 4\right) \cdot s \]
    3. associate-*l*87.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \left(u \cdot 8\right)\right)} \cdot s + \left(u \cdot 4\right) \cdot s \]
  7. Simplified87.9%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \left(u \cdot 8\right)\right)} \cdot s + \left(u \cdot 4\right) \cdot s \]
  8. Step-by-step derivation
    1. distribute-rgt-out88.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(u \cdot 8\right) + u \cdot 4\right)} \]
  9. Applied egg-rr88.0%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(u \cdot 8\right) + u \cdot 4\right)} \]
  10. Final simplification88.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(u \cdot 8\right) + u \cdot 4\right) \]

Alternative 3: 86.8% accurate, 12.1× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(u \cdot 8 + 4\right)\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (s u) :precision binary32 (* s (* u (+ (* u 8.0) 4.0))))
float code(float s, float u) {
	return s * (u * ((u * 8.0f) + 4.0f));
}
real(4) function code(s, u)
    real(4), intent (in) :: s
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    code = s * (u * ((u * 8.0e0) + 4.0e0))
end function
function code(s, u)
	return Float32(s * Float32(u * Float32(Float32(u * Float32(8.0)) + Float32(4.0))))
end
function tmp = code(s, u)
	tmp = s * (u * ((u * single(8.0)) + single(4.0)));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(u \cdot 8 + 4\right)\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 59.5%

    \[s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{1 - 4 \cdot u}\right) \]
  2. Step-by-step derivation
    1. flip3--59.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{\frac{{1}^{3} - {\left(4 \cdot u\right)}^{3}}{1 \cdot 1 + \left(\left(4 \cdot u\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right) + 1 \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right)\right)}}}\right) \]
    2. associate-/r/58.8%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \log \color{blue}{\left(\frac{1}{{1}^{3} - {\left(4 \cdot u\right)}^{3}} \cdot \left(1 \cdot 1 + \left(\left(4 \cdot u\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right) + 1 \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]
    3. log-prod58.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log \left(\frac{1}{{1}^{3} - {\left(4 \cdot u\right)}^{3}}\right) + \log \left(1 \cdot 1 + \left(\left(4 \cdot u\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right) + 1 \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right)\right)\right)\right)} \]
    4. metadata-eval58.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\log \left(\frac{1}{\color{blue}{1} - {\left(4 \cdot u\right)}^{3}}\right) + \log \left(1 \cdot 1 + \left(\left(4 \cdot u\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right) + 1 \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right)\right)\right)\right) \]
    5. *-commutative58.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\log \left(\frac{1}{1 - {\color{blue}{\left(u \cdot 4\right)}}^{3}}\right) + \log \left(1 \cdot 1 + \left(\left(4 \cdot u\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right) + 1 \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right)\right)\right)\right) \]
    6. unpow-prod-down58.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\log \left(\frac{1}{1 - \color{blue}{{u}^{3} \cdot {4}^{3}}}\right) + \log \left(1 \cdot 1 + \left(\left(4 \cdot u\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right) + 1 \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right)\right)\right)\right) \]
    7. metadata-eval58.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\log \left(\frac{1}{1 - {u}^{3} \cdot \color{blue}{64}}\right) + \log \left(1 \cdot 1 + \left(\left(4 \cdot u\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right) + 1 \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right)\right)\right)\right) \]
    8. metadata-eval58.9%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\log \left(\frac{1}{1 - {u}^{3} \cdot 64}\right) + \log \left(\color{blue}{1} + \left(\left(4 \cdot u\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right) + 1 \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right)\right)\right)\right) \]
    9. log1p-udef96.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\log \left(\frac{1}{1 - {u}^{3} \cdot 64}\right) + \color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(4 \cdot u\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right) + 1 \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right)\right)}\right) \]
    10. *-un-lft-identity96.1%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\log \left(\frac{1}{1 - {u}^{3} \cdot 64}\right) + \mathsf{log1p}\left(\left(4 \cdot u\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right) + \color{blue}{4 \cdot u}\right)\right) \]
    11. distribute-lft1-in96.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\log \left(\frac{1}{1 - {u}^{3} \cdot 64}\right) + \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(4 \cdot u + 1\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right)}\right)\right) \]
    12. fma-def96.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\log \left(\frac{1}{1 - {u}^{3} \cdot 64}\right) + \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\mathsf{fma}\left(4, u, 1\right)} \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right)\right)\right) \]
  3. Applied egg-rr96.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\log \left(\frac{1}{1 - {u}^{3} \cdot 64}\right) + \mathsf{log1p}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, u, 1\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right)\right)\right)} \]
  4. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-commutative96.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, u, 1\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right)\right) + \log \left(\frac{1}{1 - {u}^{3} \cdot 64}\right)\right)} \]
    2. log-rec96.7%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, u, 1\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right)\right) + \color{blue}{\left(-\log \left(1 - {u}^{3} \cdot 64\right)\right)}\right) \]
    3. sub-neg96.7%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, u, 1\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right)\right) + \left(-\log \color{blue}{\left(1 + \left(-{u}^{3} \cdot 64\right)\right)}\right)\right) \]
    4. log1p-def98.8%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, u, 1\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right)\right) + \left(-\color{blue}{\mathsf{log1p}\left(-{u}^{3} \cdot 64\right)}\right)\right) \]
    5. unsub-neg98.8%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\mathsf{fma}\left(4, u, 1\right) \cdot \left(4 \cdot u\right)\right) - \mathsf{log1p}\left(-{u}^{3} \cdot 64\right)\right)} \]
    6. *-commutative98.8%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(4 \cdot u\right) \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(4, u, 1\right)}\right) - \mathsf{log1p}\left(-{u}^{3} \cdot 64\right)\right) \]
    7. *-commutative98.8%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{\left(u \cdot 4\right)} \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(4, u, 1\right)\right) - \mathsf{log1p}\left(-{u}^{3} \cdot 64\right)\right) \]
    8. associate-*l*98.8%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{u \cdot \left(4 \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(4, u, 1\right)\right)}\right) - \mathsf{log1p}\left(-{u}^{3} \cdot 64\right)\right) \]
    9. distribute-rgt-neg-in98.8%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(u \cdot \left(4 \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(4, u, 1\right)\right)\right) - \mathsf{log1p}\left(\color{blue}{{u}^{3} \cdot \left(-64\right)}\right)\right) \]
    10. metadata-eval98.8%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(u \cdot \left(4 \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(4, u, 1\right)\right)\right) - \mathsf{log1p}\left({u}^{3} \cdot \color{blue}{-64}\right)\right) \]
  5. Simplified98.8%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(\mathsf{log1p}\left(u \cdot \left(4 \cdot \mathsf{fma}\left(4, u, 1\right)\right)\right) - \mathsf{log1p}\left({u}^{3} \cdot -64\right)\right)} \]
  6. Taylor expanded in u around 0 87.6%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(s \cdot u\right) + 8 \cdot \left(s \cdot {u}^{2}\right)} \]
  7. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-commutative87.6%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(s \cdot u\right) \cdot 4} + 8 \cdot \left(s \cdot {u}^{2}\right) \]
    2. associate-*r*87.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(u \cdot 4\right)} + 8 \cdot \left(s \cdot {u}^{2}\right) \]
    3. *-commutative87.9%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot 4\right) \cdot s} + 8 \cdot \left(s \cdot {u}^{2}\right) \]
    4. *-commutative87.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(u \cdot 4\right) \cdot s + 8 \cdot \color{blue}{\left({u}^{2} \cdot s\right)} \]
    5. associate-*l*87.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(u \cdot 4\right) \cdot s + \color{blue}{\left(8 \cdot {u}^{2}\right) \cdot s} \]
    6. unpow287.9%

      \[\leadsto \left(u \cdot 4\right) \cdot s + \left(8 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot u\right)}\right) \cdot s \]
    7. distribute-rgt-out88.0%

      \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(u \cdot 4 + 8 \cdot \left(u \cdot u\right)\right)} \]
    8. *-commutative88.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(\color{blue}{4 \cdot u} + 8 \cdot \left(u \cdot u\right)\right) \]
    9. associate-*r*88.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(4 \cdot u + \color{blue}{\left(8 \cdot u\right) \cdot u}\right) \]
    10. distribute-rgt-out87.7%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot \left(4 + 8 \cdot u\right)\right)} \]
    11. *-commutative87.7%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(4 + \color{blue}{u \cdot 8}\right)\right) \]
  8. Simplified87.7%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{s \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(4 + u \cdot 8\right)\right)} \]
  9. Final simplification87.7%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(u \cdot \left(u \cdot 8 + 4\right)\right) \]

Alternative 4: 73.7% accurate, 21.8× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ 4 \cdot \left(u \cdot s\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (s u) :precision binary32 (* 4.0 (* u s)))
float code(float s, float u) {
	return 4.0f * (u * s);
}
real(4) function code(s, u)
    real(4), intent (in) :: s
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    code = 4.0e0 * (u * s)
end function
function code(s, u)
	return Float32(Float32(4.0) * Float32(u * s))
end
function tmp = code(s, u)
	tmp = single(4.0) * (u * s);
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
4 \cdot \left(u \cdot s\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 59.5%

    \[s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{1 - 4 \cdot u}\right) \]
  2. Taylor expanded in u around 0 75.2%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(s \cdot u\right)} \]
  3. Step-by-step derivation
    1. *-commutative75.2%

      \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \color{blue}{\left(u \cdot s\right)} \]
  4. Simplified75.2%

    \[\leadsto \color{blue}{4 \cdot \left(u \cdot s\right)} \]
  5. Final simplification75.2%

    \[\leadsto 4 \cdot \left(u \cdot s\right) \]

Alternative 5: 73.9% accurate, 21.8× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot \left(u \cdot 4\right) \end{array} \]
(FPCore (s u) :precision binary32 (* s (* u 4.0)))
float code(float s, float u) {
	return s * (u * 4.0f);
}
real(4) function code(s, u)
    real(4), intent (in) :: s
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    code = s * (u * 4.0e0)
end function
function code(s, u)
	return Float32(s * Float32(u * Float32(4.0)))
end
function tmp = code(s, u)
	tmp = s * (u * single(4.0));
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot \left(u \cdot 4\right)
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 59.5%

    \[s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{1 - 4 \cdot u}\right) \]
  2. Taylor expanded in u around 0 75.5%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(4 \cdot u\right)} \]
  3. Final simplification75.5%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \left(u \cdot 4\right) \]

Alternative 6: 16.6% accurate, 36.3× speedup?

\[\begin{array}{l} \\ s \cdot 0 \end{array} \]
(FPCore (s u) :precision binary32 (* s 0.0))
float code(float s, float u) {
	return s * 0.0f;
}
real(4) function code(s, u)
    real(4), intent (in) :: s
    real(4), intent (in) :: u
    code = s * 0.0e0
end function
function code(s, u)
	return Float32(s * Float32(0.0))
end
function tmp = code(s, u)
	tmp = s * single(0.0);
end
\begin{array}{l}

\\
s \cdot 0
\end{array}
Derivation
  1. Initial program 59.5%

    \[s \cdot \log \left(\frac{1}{1 - 4 \cdot u}\right) \]
  2. Applied egg-rr17.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{\left(0.5 \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(4 \cdot u\right) - 0.5 \cdot \mathsf{log1p}\left(4 \cdot u\right)\right)} \]
  3. Step-by-step derivation
    1. +-inverses17.0%

      \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{0} \]
  4. Simplified17.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot \color{blue}{0} \]
  5. Final simplification17.0%

    \[\leadsto s \cdot 0 \]

Reproduce

?
herbie shell --seed 2023258 
(FPCore (s u)
  :name "Disney BSSRDF, sample scattering profile, lower"
  :precision binary32
  :pre (and (and (<= 0.0 s) (<= s 256.0)) (and (<= 2.328306437e-10 u) (<= u 0.25)))
  (* s (log (/ 1.0 (- 1.0 (* 4.0 u))))))